It's because of the RPN score. If they had given the lower point for the "unlikely detect it", the RPM score would've increased. And that would be ridiculous because if you know what the problem is, you will likely to solve the problem. That's why, the score of the detection column is vice-versa.
I have searched for the worth explanation finally I got it.thank you after a few years
thank you for the explanation, good example, help a lot
Very good example.
nice explaining..
Thanks a million
why the rate of failure cause detection opposite with the rate of failure cause occurrence
It's because of the RPN score. If they had given the lower point for the "unlikely detect it", the RPM score would've increased. And that would be ridiculous because if you know what the problem is, you will likely to solve the problem. That's why, the score of the detection column is vice-versa.
eh, it was aight i guess
where is the first video. I dont see it
first
dude, you have got to stop monetizing these videos
why