This dude talks EXACTLY how I'd imagine someone with this kind of knowledge would talk. Like in the Always Sunny in Philadelphia episode "Flowers for Charlie" where he says "I've grown rather weary." LOL
...'creating territories in relation to limits and potentials' - yes, this might be why I find these drawings so moving and beguiling - they play at the edge of the usual, and hint at potential 'other' dimensions.
Here, it is the narration that's the work of art, not the drawings. Prof. Newman's comment that these are experiments is absolutely correct, and, if someone likes these experiments, they should laude them (buy them?). However, calling them works of art implies that they are in the same category as, say, a good Rembrandt, and that would be asinine. Unfortunately, most people look at paintings with their ears-they are influenced by what the pundits (who do not paint) write and say. this makes as much sense as my passing judgement on a tennis game.
The paintings as well as the commentary are illuminations revealing what's underneath the surface. Thanks for this wonderful video.
I’m in love with Richter’s work. These‘drawings’ are amazing. Thanks
This dude talks EXACTLY how I'd imagine someone with this kind of knowledge would talk. Like in the Always Sunny in Philadelphia episode "Flowers for Charlie" where he says "I've grown rather weary." LOL
...'creating territories in relation to limits and potentials' - yes, this might be why I find these drawings so moving and beguiling - they play at the edge of the usual, and hint at potential 'other' dimensions.
thank you I have a better appreciation of Richters abstracts.
Here, it is the narration that's the work of art, not the drawings. Prof. Newman's comment that these are experiments is absolutely correct, and, if someone likes these experiments, they should laude them (buy them?). However, calling them works of art implies that they are in the same category as, say, a good Rembrandt, and that would be asinine.
Unfortunately, most people look at paintings with their ears-they are influenced by what the pundits (who do not paint) write and say. this makes as much sense as my passing judgement on a tennis game.
Yada yada
🤩🤩🤩
Please show more drawing and less of the homely Englishmen.
The ink drawings are good, the pencil drawings are rubbish