Why Don't We Eat Carnivores?
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- Come play Beast Lord on Android and iOS here: beastlord.onelink.me/4a2w/Min...
And use redeem code: MINUTEEARTH
#BeastLord #AnimalGame #LionGame
Humans eat a lot of different animals, but almost none of them are carnivores - why?
LEARN MORE
**************
To learn more about this topic, start your googling with these keywords:
- Biomagnification: the process by which substances (usually harmful ones) in the natural environment gradually increase in concentration along the food chain
- Trophic level: A level or position in a food chain, a food web, or an ecological pyramid.
- Herbivore: an organism that mostly feeds on plants
- Omnivore: an organism that feeds on plants and animals
- Carnivore: an organism that eats exclusively - or almost exclusively - animals.
SUPPORT MINUTEEARTH
**************************
If you like what we do, you can help us!:
- Become our patron: / minuteearth
- Our merch: dftba.com/minuteearth
- Our book: minuteearth.com/books
- Share this video with your friends and family
- Leave us a comment (we read them!)
CREDITS
*********
Kate Yoshida | Script Writer, Narrator and Director
Arcadi Garcia i Rius & Sarah Berman | Illustration, Video Editing and Animation
Nathaniel Schroeder | Music
MinuteEarth is produced by Neptune Studios LLC
neptunestudios.info
OUR STAFF
************
Lizah van der Aart • Sarah Berman • Cameron Duke
Arcadi Garcia i Rius • David Goldenberg • Melissa Hayes
Alex Reich • Henry Reich • Peter Reich
Ever Salazar • Leonardo Souza • Kate Yoshida
OUR LINKS
************
CZcams | / minuteearth
TikTok | / minuteearth
Twitter | / minuteearth
Instagram | / minute_earth
Facebook | / minuteearth
Website | minuteearth.com
Apple Podcasts| podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
REFERENCES
**************
Han BA, Kramer AM, Drake JM. Global Patterns of Zoonotic Disease in Mammals. Trends Parasitol. 2016 Jul;32(7):565-577. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.04.00
Leroy F, Smith NW, Adesogan AT, Beal T, Iannotti L, Moughan PJ, Mann N. The role of meat in the human diet: evolutionary aspects and nutritional value. Anim Front. 2023 Apr 15;13(2):11-18. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac093
Kim SW, Han SJ, Kim Y, Jun JW, Giri SS, Chi C, et al. (2019) Heavy metal accumulation in and food safety of shark meat from Jeju island, Republic of Korea. PLoS ONE 14(3): e0212410. doi: /10.1371/journal.pone.0212410
Koster JM, Hodgen JJ, Venegas MD et al. (2010) Is Meat Flavor a Factor in Hunters’ Prey Choice Decisions?. Hum Nat 21, 219-242. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9093-1 - Věda a technologie
If you're interested in seeing how the sausage is made here at MinuteEarth, become our Patreon or member on CZcams! Just visit www.patreon.com/MinuteEarth or click "JOIN". Thanks!
I have a question for the team, did you use a text to speech gpt to do the ad read at the end ? It sounds different from the rest of the video?
@@GamerDuDimanche1456 hi! editor here. no AI was used - all Kate as always, just a different take edited differently than the main portion. Apologies for the uncanniness in the transition :)
Watch ordinary sausage too if you wanna see more
I've read that early American settlers would eat anything they could hunt. (The flavor varied greatly.) It's likely that most people living in wilderness areas throughout history did the same. But once most of the carnivores have been hunted, all that's left are the herbivores. (And with no predators, their population increases.) It's much easier to domesticate herbivores.
Now why not just eat the plants instead? The reason is that most livestock eat plants that humans can't eat.
3:53 - I would like to see a video on us eating the plants directly. That would be wonderful.
CGP Grey summarized it best: "Ten pounds of grass make a pound of cow, and ten pounds of cow make a pound of tiger. But cow and tiger have the same amount of calories, so you might as well just eat the cow."
Might as well eat dirt 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🥶🥶🤢🤢
But Kate also made a good point--if humans just ate the grass (really grain/corn), it'd be even more efficient!
@@NickWrightDataYT good thing we are now cows
Hence why veganism would cost less if it weren't for the subsidies provided to the meat industry
And having 1/10 as much farmland would mean 1/10 as much chemical runoff, also fixing the problem of the Dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
@@NickWrightDataYTthe logic of veganism ...
We already use soy to grow cattles so why not eat soy ?
I could think of many things:
- their diet is too expensive
- you cannot herd them
- they might attack you
- they are probably territorial, no chance of having lots of them in a small area
❌ WRONG❌WRONG❌WRONG❌
People eat what easy to hunt & control🤷♀️ We would have eat each other if it easy to hunt humans, control them & eat them🤏
@@duran9664 they literally just said that they're not easy to hunt or control so how is it wrong
@@AiNaKait's a bot dawg
@@harthroth it does seem to be a bot, but it's a bit weird how its comment is tailored to the video
@harthroth Maybe not, it's related to the vid... probably just a person?
You missed the basic point, carnivores usually reproduce at lower numbers and lower frequency than herbivores.
It is easier to extinct tigers than sheep.
That's not true, cows born one by one, tigers have a litter of 3 or more cubs per season, the problem is that adult tigers do not coexist peacefully.
I think we also have an unspoken alliance with carnivores--or better put---hunters. We respect them. As long as they don't bother us we don't bother them (mostly). That and they're a lot more clever than herbivores.
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
I don’t think that’s really a point since companies would just overproduce to compensate for the lower frequency. It’s most likely a bunch of those reasons to make the whole picture.
Yeah, it's already obvious. Why would early humans go for a single dangerous tiger that will literally turn you into its prey, rather than a herd of sheep that's easier to catch. And pretty sure the big boys won't easily get swayed like the early dogs.
Hearing her say nasties is just so weird. Btw for reference the process she mention is called bio accumulation.
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
Indeed
@@VeganSemihCyprus33 Ok, I do.
@@VeganSemihCyprus33I'm vegetarian but I don't cry like a bitch when someone eat meat. Grow up.
Take your vit B12 supplements your brain is weakening
I liked it
i find it really funny you use an aligator in a farm as an example of "we don't farm carnivores" when infact we litterally have aligator farms for their meat in Louisiana
thats mostly for their skin right?
@@TrainerGoldAlt I've eaten gator on multiple occasions, in restaurants and otherwise. It's definitely a bit of an outlier here.
I noticed that but I don't think you can argue that it's common or makes up a significant portion of human eaten meat.
@@TrainerGoldAlt but the meat rather than ended in dump, better consumed by anyone who wants to taste it
@@TrainerGoldAlt for the skin and the meat, the meat is like a really good cross between fish and chicken
"We don't eat carnivores" *looks at my bowl of alligator gumbo*
It's probably more efficient to eat alligator compared to other carnivores because unlike warm blooded animals that turn only 10 percent of food into mass and the rest into heat and energy the alligator turns about 70 percent into mass and relays on the sun for heat
We are not in China
@@ahassan5 its also a delicacy in Australia i believe. They say it tastes like chicken and the tail has a pretty good texture
Edit: Turns out there are crocodiles in Australia, not alligators
Was just finna say that. Like- I'm definitely eating fried gator
Fried gator = Mmm
Back in the old days, carnivores were harder to hunt and the reward to risk ratio was not worth it, in the present times, it is very difficult and inefficient to grow carnivores for food, so it is highly practical to eat herbivores
There was nothing harder to hunt for humans, like carnivorous fish example was given.
@@tackytaco8133 What? Oh lord... "nothing harder to hunt", sure, a grazing deer or cow ancestor would've been just as trivial to hunt as a sabertooth tiger. /facepalm. Oh BUT WAIT! - Gets better: the fantastic counterargument is that we've hunted (and still do)... carnivorous fish! Argh... I just felt millions of braincells shouting in pain...
No its because allah made it haram for us to eat them
That one episode from JoJo's Golden Wind where mista discusses cannibalism:
knew there was gonna be a jojo reference here somewhere
Conversely for seafood, we humans predominantly eat carnivorous fish, while we rarely eat herbivorous fish. Herbivore fish taste like the plants they eat. Which isn't good.
I think the reason why is because there aren’t that many of them and they aren’t very large either. Whereas Tuna, Salmon, etc can get pretty large, taste good and because we don’t farm them, we don’t have to pump resources into them
Oceanic food webs just operate on another level
It's not about taste. There just aren't very many, they're not particularly big, and they have a significant risk of being toxic. People eat them anyway, but it's not common because it's not efficient.
What about sardines and shrimp.
@@freerolll I think the specific species (plural) of shrimp are carnivorous, but you are right about sardines being omnivores.
For most of human history, eating a carnivore would've just been HARD. Why fight a bear for it's meat when you could hunt a deer, where you'd be less likely to get injured and die? Then as a course, we'd never develop the taste/immune system/etc. for eating predators.
Also - there might be 20 or more deer for each wolf in the neighbourhood, so it's much easier to hunt the deer.
Actually hunting is the only reliable way to eat carmnivores and we have proof than ancient humans regurarly ate carnivores
Most bears are omnivores but the point is still valid.
I think the first part of what of what you said is correct. I don't know about the taste/ immune system part. It makes sense that herd animals would be the choice to hunt over more solitary animals, which is also why we eat fish that are predators, as they tend to swim in schools. It's about calories per effort. The Native Americans knew it was much more cost effective to herd a group of buffalo over a cliff than to hunt down solitary predators.
isotope analysis suggests that we ate other carnivores too
I've had lion burgers, bear jerky, grilled shark, and snake every way you can think to cook it.
Well.....how they taste?
Those taste good.Lots of bear recipes available. Bear roast is delicious. Pay attention to meat temperature!
@@paloma_oni unremarkable surprisingly enough
@@paloma_onii don't know about the ones they mentioned but i tasted crocodile i think?or is it alligator whatever it is.It taste like fish but has hardness as chicken or the other way round i forgot.
My family got it as a souvenir and I'd say they taste alright so the we
So it's definitely not because of taste.
Maybe combination
- efficiency
- stigma
- safety
Also Gator dogs
putting the ad to the end is a W + nice vid overall, deserves a like
You are not even considering that hunting a deer is significantly easier than hunting a cougar
idk man, there's like 4 in my dms promising a weekly allowance of $1000, as long as I send my bank details first
Right alongside the idea that they would be less safe to eat this is what occurred to me first. When you hunt a deer, rabbit or whatnot, you are the predator, and they are the prey trying to get away from you. With a carnivore, you are both hunters, and it becomes a much more dangerous game.
I'm hunting cougars at the moment in Red Dead Redemption 2 and can confirm.
Especially when the cougar also considers hunting you just as much !
@@avu2888 LMAO😭😭😭😭
I'll add another possible reason: humans used to be hunter-gatherers, and hunting a carnivore probably was way too dangerous to be worth the effort
Yea. I assume if they killed it in defense, they might eat it but hunting to eat it? Dangerous
I wouldn't be so sure on that hypothesis as a discovery was made in Africa in Kenya or Tanzania that homo erectus regularly hunted carnivorous in that area for food
Yeah, that's the first thing I thought of when I saw the thumbnail, but I'm appalled that an evolutionary perspective wasn't considered in the video.
Yes, I thought of this, too. Especially since it also explains why we would have an exception for carnivorous fish: fish generally aren't as dangerous as carnivorous land animals.
This was my idea
I'm no expert but hunting or herding tigers seems a lot harder then hunting or herding rabbits.
Great!! 👏 Always needed this kind of appropriate answer.
A point about the inefficiency of cows, though, which I think is important to point out
Historically, raising cattle (not just cows but sheep and goats too) was done in areas where it was hard to grow crops, but where grass grew readily. Humans can't eat grass, so it was an easy way to turn inedible calories into edible ones. It didn't matter that it took 10000 calories of grass to make 1000 calories of cow because those 10000 calories of grass were useless to us. It wasn't that different from the fish example.
Then we started growing crops to feed the cattle tho, which kind of defeats the purpose of having the cattle in the first place. But originally at least, it made perfect sense.
another point is that our digestion systems are significantly less adapted for grass than a cow is, so regardless of how many calories exist in grass we can't directly benefit from it without farming animals who do have digestion systems capable of digesting said grass.
Even now, it *sort* of does. Some percentage of a harvest of say, wheat is usually pretty poor quality, you might eat it if you were starving and it would be pretty horrible (it would probably be grits or porridge because the protein content is too low for bread or pasta), but in an otherwise abundant food environment, it's going to go to waste. There are also fodder crops like alfalfa that grow more readily in poor soil but are also not very nutritious for humans. Finally there's waste products from the food industry like sugar beet pulp or molasses.
Not to say high quality human edible grains are not fed to cattle sometimes, especially in the US where it is extremely cheap to produce, but there's still a lot of sources of animal feed which could not be easily diverted for human use.
Just like you said.
Additionally, for millions of years of human history and teens of thousands of years of history, animals and land was plentiful until very very recently.
Herbivores were pests in agricultural areas, especially after dangerous carnivore threats/competitors were eliminated. So hunting deer, elk, antelope, horse, rabbit, etc. became a necessity and it still is. And they are delicious and nutritious, and can be excellently paired with plants and drinks.
another point is food waste and bad crops and forage. Stuff we gathered that we can’t eat so we feed it to what we can eat
@@Croz89Yea forage cover crops with livestock can actually improve soils in degraded land reversing deserts. Every thing in nature has a purpose but people try demonize livestock ,When we caused more harm through industrial waste. But they wont focus on that part because of all the oil companies
I think you kinda missed what's imo the big one: we don't just eat herbivores, we specifically eat ruminants and fowl (and pork, which is also the most common meat, but I'll get back to that), which are animals that eat grass and seeds. Specifically, those are things that human derive little to no nutrition from, but are incredibly abundant. For most of human history (really, all of it prior to the Second Agricultural Revolution), we didn't grow food to feed animals, we just let them graze on otherwise unused grassland or hay, which is effectively a byproduct of the grains we actually eat. As such, they were basically a way of converting inedible plant matter into stuff we can actually eat.
Pigs are the big exception to that, in that they don't eat grasses primarily. However, they do eat anything. All of the waste and scraps that get produced by people can be fed to pigs, and they'll also happily find food in an otherwise barren field.
Basically, the reason we eat those animals primarily is just because those animals were effectively no-effort food sources at a time when food production was the vast majority of human labour.
This comment wins the question.
This should get pinned well said. It makes sense that we'd find the most efficient way to satisfy our need for food and what could be easier than eating animals that eat the stuff we don't eat or need makes perfect sense... imagine trying to catch antelope to feed to your leopard so you can eat it 😂😂
The pig is a tricky one though, if you only feed it trash, the meat will taste like trash, unless you fed it good quality food the last few months of it life, making its meat mid quality, but if you fed it with high quality food all its life, you end up with good quality meat (let's ignore for a moment the different breeds and how the environment can influence on the quality)
Yes, and this points out a very good reason why the religion hypothesis doesn't really hold up: both Judaism and Islam prohibit pork, and yet it is the most consumed meats on the planet. If that were a cultural factor, it would mean western cultures would not eat so much of it.
Since the 2nd Agricultural Revolution, we waste a huge amount of resources like land and fresh water to produce animal products.
Animal agriculture is the top cause of deforestation, and biodiversity loss.
It is also a major cause of climate change, water pollution, ocean dead zones, and the threat of zoonotic diseases, and antibiotic resistance.
It is long past the time to change to a plant based food production system!
Woah, I didn't know you have made another channel. Subscribing to it now.
A major factor with the whole "it's more efficient to get the calories from plants" things seems to be that mostly humans got their calories from meat because of there being lots of inedible plants in an area so the animals were about to convert those inaccessible calories into edible calories. Otherwise it seems that most humans get their calories from plants much more often in regions where growing edible plants was most favorable...
Thank you for convincing me to not take up cannibalism.
XD
😂 i read somewhere that human meat not only smell bad and the texture a little strange however its close to pig at least that is good
@@aimliard2276speak for yourself. I hate pork
@@aimliard2276
That's why another term for cannibalism is "long pig."
Did you not watch the video? Typical humans would taste bad but grass-fed humans should be delicious.
This is more “why we don’t farm carnivores” more so than “why we don’t eat carnivores”. We eat plenty of carnivores but farm very little of them.
Very good
True. We eat crocodile meat.
@@tinachristine4573yeah while watching this video I was thinking, I've had crocodile, everyone with me liked it and the meat was very soft
They are farmed ,but for their fur not their meat
Tuna too! @tinachristine4573
What about because there aren’t as many to hunt/ they’re more risky to hunt but I think the danger of hunting them in the first place is a likely factor that contributes as to why we may not eat many carnivorous animals.
1:17 The Pokémon references! Love it 😁
As CGPGray once said, “Thermodynamics”
Soooo long ago
"We are the top Chicken" -CGP
Ten pounds of grass make a pound of steak, and ten pounds of steak make a pound of tiger
Gd reference
@@hdrodic And we can't eat grass.
I've heard this quote from a hunting channel once.
"No meat you cook will taste bad as long as you cook it correct way and put in enough seasoning."
yeah any funky meat can be turned delicious by plenty of garlic, pepper, ginger, salt and onions.
It’s true. Just make sure you check for rabies after..
@@orangejacket4551 And lots of parasite species resistant to heat... So I say, no thanks! 🤣
That just further solidifies the point why carnivores never became popular - to make their meat tender you need to put in a lot of time and energy.
In short, waste. Not just time or ingredients but energy as well. Why make yourself suffer when you can achieve the same thing with lesser effort?
The Exotic Meat Market after seeing this video: Hold My Lion Meat.
the first game advert that actually makes sense
definitely checking out the beast lord game
Thanks for the video
Other carnivores we eat include crustaceans, reptiles, terrapins, cetaceans, pinipeds, and amphibians.
Also cephalopods, and dogs and cats in some places
@@roseyuen6916Lol I never understand that as you might as well eat rabbits, at that point there more efficient but I guess poor starving people eat stray dogs and cats.
Fish
❌ WRONG❌WRONG❌WRONG❌
People eat what easy to hunt & control🤷♀️ We would have eat each other if it easy to hunt humans, control them & eat them🤏
@@duran9664 No we wouldnt do that Its psychopathic
3:33 That cow has two people going for a kiss on its back!
side*
@@dryzalizer No, it's a chalice!
Well spotted!
What
They painted a cow with a Rorschach painting, very cool
Such a cool video. Thanks!
What animations software did u use?
One straightforward reason related to efficiency is that there are significantly more herbivores in nature than carnivores.
I'm also 90% sure prey animals give birth more often and have larger litters of offspring. They likely even grow faster than carnivores
That's why we were hunter gatherers for most of our history.
Your reason explains more than the other proposed reasons.
And they're easier to hunt/catch, never mind farm!
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
Definitely the inefficiencies/cost for farming. Snakes, Alligator/Crocodile, Shark, Whale, Bear, Seals, are all eaten around the world, but often require hunting/catching in the wild.
Thank you, finally someone mentioning HUNTING in this topic...
Snake meat is amazing. Some of the best $50 or so a pound I've ever bought on the extremely rare occasion it is available.,
Snake and Gator/Croc are an exception due to their methods of digestion/cold blooded factor. A snake only requires you give it a mouse once a week (I'm generalizing a theory, some snake owner can clarrify) while the gator/croc has an entire season where their metabolism basically shuts off. It is therefore cost efficienct to raise these for meat even though you'll be feeding them meat.
@@bigmoe9856
Do reptiles grow fast for economic efficiency ?
@@MarianLuca-rz5kk compared to herbivores, no, this will be an investment on time. But they do have multplie offspring so you'll be working with batches
this is an actual interest topic. thanks for trying
Really appreciate the effort put into this ❤❤
South East Asians: what are you talking about?
We eat anything have 4 legs, unless it’s a chair lol
They're not afraid of danger
you mean chinese
Or anyone who has eaten alligators, snakes, or many types of ocean creatures.
@@GhostRiley-zs8zb they be snacking too
The "nasties" idea also applies to fish. Some species of fish are considered less "clean" because of their levels of heavy metals, PCB and other nasties.
Ah yes I love me some fish with a motherboard (PCB) in it /s
and some societies dont like fish or even people cant eat fish
like thuna
@@fraizie6815frr, capacitors are just so 🤤
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
I thought of this question so many times glad there is a video about it
One thing we could add is a link between the efficiency and taste hypothetis : the meat we eat and like is in the most part from animals that have been selected over millenia to taste how we want to (like cattle, chikens etc). And the animals we domesticate cannot be carnivorous because they are harder to feed more dangerous to keep arround
"We don't eat carnivores"
Fish: am I a joke to you?
she mentions them in the vid
2:43
she mentions that in the vid broski
I want eat a white shark!
@@GabrielMoura-qe3il all the power to you
I think a big note is hunted meat vs farmed meat. Farmed meat we don't do predators on because of the conversion ratio among other things. As for hunted meat, a lot of people are not hunters. Also in theory it may have to do with availiability. Like if you have to eat multiple animals to keep yourself alive that in theory implies that there must be more of those things. If there was more predators then prey then the predators would end up starving themselves. So if you treat hunting as a random draw you are more likely to get something lower on the peaking order then something higher on the peaking order. You could target those rarer creatures but that would in effect just be drawing more cards/spending more effort.
For the ADHD kids scrolling through, here is the tl;dr version: _"The population math doesn't add up"_ 👈 You're welcome 😊
This is probably the biggest answer and also why fish are the "exception".
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
Interesting fun fact: sharks don’t think we taste very well. However, there are some people that think sharkfin soup is delicious.
This video is unique and believe it or not this is the first time I came across such since I started using internet.
Very thought provocative‼️
My first thought was that when you decide what animal to go and eat, you're better off choosing one that's unlikely to pull an Uno reverse card on you.
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
I love how this video just ignored alligator farms in Southern US states. They are farmed to be slaughtered for their meat.
They had pictures of them. They are not common though.
Just as immoral as eating cows and pigs
@@alexgrissom3513believing that is tantamount to believing human existence is immoral,or/and any other carnivores as well.
@@hawoaliahmed6996 nope. You’re arguing what’s called an appeal to nature logical fallacy.
@@alexgrissom3513 how is it a fallacy? you cant just claim that. You have to explain WHY it's immoral. Say, because eating meat is bad for the environment, and choosing to eat it over more sustainable options is morally wrong because of the negative impact on the environment. Otherwise they're not wrong - there is nothing morally wrong about the concept of eating other animals. It's a fact of survival
You forgot horse at the beginning. I once saw horse meat 🍖 at a local store. I was shocked !!
I thought the deer looking like Deerling was just me being too Poképilled but then I saw the other animals. Nice nod, even got a shiny in there.
I just found out about this channel and I noticed that the sponsor was at the end of the video
You've earned my respect for not ruining the flow of the video by putting the sponsor in the middle
People probably put it in the middle because people are less likely to watch it if it's at the end. You've already seen the entire video. It would be like sticking around for the credits. Most people aren't going to do that.
There's dofferent values for where they put the ad role. The middle is the most expensive and the beginning is the least.@@HappilyCarnivore
I always assumed it was because predators are hard to domesticate. The exception is dogs and cats and they are eaten in certain parts of the world, but they're used in other ways regardless.
The dogs they eat in Korea that are raised on farms are fed plant based foods. I was stationed there and there was a dog farm just off base. They are fed basically the same thing pigs are fed. Lots of soybeans etc.
@@PeterSedesse Huh! Well, TIL… thanks!
Dogs are omnivores, only cats are carnivores
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018)
I like the pokemon refrence at 1:03 :)
Good catch
@MinuteEarth, there are some countries in Africa where you can eat game meat and that does include, sometimes, some carnivores. Also, in Zimbabwe, we do have a supermarket chain that sells a lot of crocodile meat and it is very affordable and tasty!! You just need someone who knows how to cook it well...
In Zimbabwe we eat crocodile tail which is a by product from crocodile farms that produce leather for the fashion industry but like the video said it's not that readily available and is very seasonal but tastes great
Louisiana,Texas, and Florida does this
@@jalenwatson4261 more so alligator not croc
You can get it anywhere in the US.
We do the same in South Africa. It's expensive and more of a novelty item, but it tastes very similar to chicken.
@@marcusmoonstein242 it does. Have you tried it grilled with mixed potato and sweet potato chips. Heavenly.
The casual occasionally Pokémon in your animations always make my day :)
I noticed Deerling, Ursaring, Magikarp, and maybe Lycanroc.
1:03 here
I've heard that bear is actually pretty good. Never tried it myself but I think I'll have to try it out in the spring if i do.
yeah, the effectiveness aspect just puts the cabosh on this whole idea. I reckon there're very few companies out there willing to try and raise, say, tigers to sell the meat, simply because their food is expensive by default. the rest is probably debatable, there ARE a handful of carnivores we can eat (including gators, btw), but it's just not broadly cost-effective in the current economy (or any economy, I guess), to the point eating farm-raised lions would be considered comically decadent, even if made viable
Gator meat is a bit of an exception, maybe it is the transition from aquatic to terrestrial animals.
Some Japan eat bear meat
For farming sure. That's it though. Talk to a real hunter and that changes a lot. People eat all sorts of carnivores
We eat snakes, dogs, cats, and all other kinds of animals
We don't eat herbivores either 👉 Dominion (2018).
People do eat bear, crocs, frogs, snakes, shark. They're mostly hunted rather than farmed of course.
Bear are omnivores (except polar bears and they aren't generally eaten) the rest are cold blooded and therefore have a much higher efficiency of turning food into meat around 3-4 times better than mammals.
People eat cetaceans (whales and such) too. Snapping turtles, sea birds, cats, dogs, seals, spiders, crustaceans
Great video. Thought provoking.
The sun gives grass energy, the cow eats the grass for energy, we eat the cow to get the energy that we couldnt get from the grass/sun.
Not many cows are just grass feed, and even so, where the grass is grown, you could grow other crops, like hemp (good for poor land), soy, wheat, etc. We would still use much less land eating these directly then use them to feed cows (or similar mammals). A lot of the Amazonian rain forest distruction is purely for growing soy for cattle feed, so this does have a massive impact on our ecosystems.
Well red meat is not good for human diet so it's better not to consume cow
Then I guess we should not eat grass but become grass to eat sun.
@@lilnibba2905 I don't think you understand. You replace the grass pastures with the many other food crops that we can consume. Humans don't need to change to eat soy, hemp, wheat, vegetables, fruit, corn, lentils, etc.
@@dotmakesnoise yeah you are right, but they digest things differently than us. We still need to eat those veggies ourselves, but the way they digest the food is different and we can't pull the same nutrients in the same way in some cases.
I think there's also an evolutionary reason, hunting a carnivore is much more difficult and dangerous then hunting a herbivore, so we probably adapted to prefer herbivore meat over carnivore meat. I assume that's why most carnivores mostly feast on herbivores.
Also fishing a carnivorous fish is as easy as fishing a herbivore fish so that can explain why we like carnivorous fish too.
3:54 We basically just can't eat most things that cows, pigs, sheep, ect. can eat. We can't eat grass, we can't eat the stock of a bean, corn or tomato, we can't eat the leafs of carrots, turnips or potatoes. Instead of spending even more time and energy to make them edible as well, it's just easier to give them to the animals, who can also safely feed off of moldy bread.
Making land to feed animals is one of the biggest causes of deforestation. A lot of that land is used to grow crops to feed to animals.
@@evilduck1000 have you thought about the fact that some soils are just unfit to grow crops for us to eat, and that a pound of beef is much more nutritious than a pound of wheat or rice?
@@evilduck1000Most of that land is used for oil palm, Livestock agriculture is only about 20% of habitable land.
That makes sense. In the modern world, it would actually be rather nice if farm animals were fed more or less only parts of edible plants that we don't eat (and/or other [for them] edible waste [edit:] or other things that can be grown in soils unsuitable for edible crops, like grass). It's just too bad this isn't really the case on the large scale
I literally just saw my local Safeway grocery store selling literal yard grass to eat, by the lettuce lol. 😂
Very intresting.
We might never have a way to tame them but I am curius which are save to eat or not to eat and how they taste, especially in a extreme survival situation if I ever end up in a Deserted Island or something.
As someone who lives in the shores of brazil, i can say that some types of crocodiles and sharks tastes delicious
I am vegan, does that mean I'm delicious? 😇
Jeffrey Dahmer aproved
no, sym
YES BRAV
Could be. Just gotta make sure the meat is well cooked to avoid the kuru. Almost makes me wanna carry some bbq sauce with me at all times. 🤪🤯
Yes!
I like how alligators were shown several times as an example of a predator we don’t eat or farm.
But throughout the south they are eaten and farmed. And hunted. It’s super tasty meat.
No thanks
@@AndrewManooki would like to taste them
Crocodile meat is very delicious and a common food in some places. But taste good just if it is well seasoned, if not, the taste is too strong, not easy to eat.
This question randomly came up my mind a few months ago and I finally got an answer
You mean you've never eaten alligator meat? I highly recommend it. Almost just like chicken.
Frog legs too, but closer to the texture of fish.
I've had alligator jerky. It was good!
Just remember to be responsible while hunting!
alligator or crocodile tastes like turkey but with the texture of beef. very strange, but tasty experience
Alligator is absolutely delicious one of my favorite foods especially that tail😋.
Its the most easy explanation that hunting a herbivore is easier than a carnivore for the risk of getting hunted down and the difference in numbers too. Thousands of herbivores vs few carnivores vs even lesser humans. Also Ockham's razor is a factor.
also when you pick an animal to keep against its will to breed and domesticate the choice is made for you by nature XD
4:34 Includes NO PIG AT ALL
Could the answer possible be that hunting something mostly harmless to you is much easier than to do so to something that could eat you?
Loved the Pokémon and the Gravity Falls references! Subtle, but well done.
The word nasty has a good connotation to my adult brain 😂😂
3:53 since humans can't digest cellulose properly, we don't get much nutrition from cellulose rich plants, like grass. Since cows can properly digest it and grow as a result, we can use cows as a way to get at least some nutrients from the grass that we wouldn't be able to otherwise
We don't have a good explanation? You literally gave one really good reason, efficiency. Prey animals are easy to domesticate and they have infinite food souce.
second, cows, rabbits, goats, etc. have multichambered stomachs for digesting it and some of them eat the same food after it goes out the back end.
That's important because even animals that have evolved to eat it, don't get all the nutrients and cows have to eat a lot.
Our stomachs don't work nearly as well and they can eat things that we can't. We're taking advantage of that trait, let them get their energy from stuff we can't really eat and we just harvest it from them.
Which leaves me to the last point, they taste good, grass doesn't.
biomagnification
Plus all the excess estrogen in soy throws off your hormones. The evidence for the health of a plant based diet is inconclusive at BEST.
By population size there's lots of plants, many plant-eaters, and few plant-eater-eaters. Hunting at the bigger buffet means you'll get more food
Phyton snake is the only carnivore that have a good chance to be on meat production.
Because :
1. It can eat unconsumable things, like rotten chicken meat or its intestine parts of cow (or any other of our food) that human won't eat it.
2. They can eat one big portion then stay for several days or weeks without food.
3. They have good food to meat conversion ratio
But, there are some problems:
1. They should be kept in separate cage, because they are territorial.
2. They are dangerous to the keeper, so a strong and safe cage should be made
3. Their meat might not suitable with most people taste.
I read news that currently there are some people that testing this idea..
I was so about to comment that people today might have had their diet altered by religion earlier on in the ancestory. But you covered it, impressive
you forgot a few other reason:
back when we were hunter gatherer, hunting a gazelle is less risky then hunting a tiger. If you fail the gazelle simply run away. The tiger might turn around and eat you instead.
Once we started to raise our livestock, it's much easier and safer to control a herd of cow rather then a pack of wolf.
Then similarly, the problem we have with spiders, most carnivores are solitary creatures or lives in small family structures and require a huge piece of land. So on your farm you could raise 1 tiger or a whole herd of cow (and less chance the herd of cow will attack the farmer then the tiger)
Finally, numbers. most big predators are on the list of animals in danger of extinction. Because as mention earlier most of then live in small groups or solitary on huge vast of land, they often have a slow reproduction cycle making them way harder to farm.
In Indonesia we eat snakes, crocodiles, monkeys, cats, dogs, bats, monitor lizards.
You wouldn't even believe how much Jakarta people consume dog meat per year
There's a saying in Vietnam as a joke. If it move, it's edible =)))
Asians even eat cockroaches as well. Sometimes when I think about it, it's like eating whatever is caught.
These diets are mainly in China and South East Asia.
In the South we eat alligator and rattlesnakes on occasion
And that folks is how we got covid
Its probably just because hunting them before modern technology was so dangerous we just didn't bother
Isnt it because they provide less energy the higher they are in the food chain?
I feel that an additional detail is that for most of our history, carnivores weren't remotely practical to hunt. Putting aside the sheer danger, they produce far less meat than an equally-dangerous herbivore-ex. a mammoth. Furthermore, predators are much more likely to be able to sneak up on your compared to a herbivore, and conversely would find it easier to hide from us as well. It's not like dangerous creature weren't hunted, but they were not hunted FOR FOOD- for glory or profit usually. If you just need to eat and don't care about such things it's so much safer to jus stalk a gazelle, and even big prey would lack interest unless you have a tribe to feed.
top-chain predators really do condense things like parasites, heavy metals, and other bad stuff, which you covered here. thats probably one of the reasons we avoid them.
We avoid mammalian predators but we don't seem to have the same concern for eating predatory fish, which have the exact same problem of bioaccumulation. I think the main reason we eat tuna but not tigers simply comes down to tuna being far more numerous and easier to catch.
@@isaacbruner65Do those fish really have the same accumulation problem as carnivorous land animals? I assume not, since a quick look at your average consumable tuna and history of eating them just fine seems to indicate otherwise
@aereonexapprentice7205 tuna has a relatively high mercury contents than fishes on the lower foodchain such as herrings
@@aereonexapprentice7205 Also, even if they accumulated parasites( Let's ignore the heavy metals for now, as they are indeed an issue when fish and seafod is concerned), most of them might not be compatible with mammals because they evolved to infect fish. Meanwhile, tigers are a lot close to us genetically, so a tiger parasite of disease might infect us. I imagine that's why monkeys and rats are quite dangerous to eat, even if we created them in a lab.
By the way there are alligator farms and in florida, alligators are eaten pretty regularly. They taste a lot like chicken too. Like a LOT like chicken.
Personally i think back in the Paleolithic age when we had basic hunting tools it was way easier to hunt Herbivore Animals especially because most of the times they are in groups so easier to find and easier to hunt. And it kept passing from generation to generation.
Alligators are delicious and there are even alligator farms, like fish farms, meant to supply meat to various places all along the Gulf Coast. We totally eat carnivores lol
But it depends on the species.
I assume those farms let the alligators hunt themselves as they be expensive to feed
What do they feed the alligators
theres a reason this is rare and essentially only occurs in one location
Something to note. Fish such as salmon are indeed carnivores. However, they are not at the top of the ocean food web. That title belongs to sharkes, dolphins, and whales, which we generally tend to avoid. I think this is important to know because the "nasty stuff" that they have are considerably higher levels of mercury.
My 7+ kg of ground whale meat in the freezer:
Do you think we don't eat tuna and swordfish?
@eljanrimsa5843 Tuna and Swordfish are not on top of the food web.
@@alvinvaldes5034 Only orcas are on top of the food web in the ocean, but 15-foot tuna and swordfish are pretty high up there. And they have the mercury load to prove it. We eat them.
@eljanrimsa5843 With Swordfish, it is generally not recommended to eat them. Tuna, however, there are many safe species to consume. Sharkes are a level higher above them.
I always thought it was (historically) availability and safety.
You find prey animals easier, so you eat those more by default.
A lot of predators are either massive and dangerous to hunt, pack animals that are dangerous to hunt, or both.
I mean, in the southern US, they eat snake and crocodile, which are both predators, because they are abundant and there were (relatively) safe ways to catch them.
For the present-day, it seems to be related to ease and cost if farming, and whether the animal is already (mostly) domesticated.
That is why there is a push for the establishment of snake farms raising pythons for their meat, as they require very little water relatively low food for a proportionally large amount of meat that grows fairly quickly.
3:55 "It's more efficient to eat the plant itself", I myself can't eat gras and there is a whole lot of land that you don't want to turn into farmland.
It's also usually a lot easier to hunt the herbivores. They're either fairly harmless like rabbits, or herd together making bigger targets for spears and bows, like bison, cows, or sheep. On the other hand, a lot harder to hunt something that's probably already hunting you. Something with dangerous claws and teeth as well as incredible speed and stealth.
It's because it's easier for us to cultivate grains to feed them and graise animals than it is to feed meat eating animals to then eat.
And that's relatively new thing too. Chickens primarily only eat grain and so raising them was a bit more prestigious to have as a meal.
Now you can get a box of chicken nuggets from McDonald's for like five bucks
@@silkyz68Yea but steak taste alot better chickens actually eat the majority of grains grown in us and its subsidized by big corn.
❌ WRONG❌WRONG❌WRONG❌
People eat what easy to hunt & control🤷♀️ We would have eat each other if it easy to hunt humans, control them & eat them🤏
They are more docile
@@silkyz68chickens eat meat too, they eat insects and sometimes other chickens
Because of how domesticated dogs and cats are we could probably farm them if we really wanted to.
Chinese and Koreans say hello.
@@mihair2854 I heard that it was actually illegal to do in those countries but they do it anyways like they do with a lot of things over there because Asia sucks apparently.
I don't know if it's just the videos I'm getting fed on the internet but I don't see videos about other places that probably should suck too because cartels and s***
Was that animation a deerling, a magikarp, an ursaring, and a shiny Lycanroc or am I just too obsessed with Pokémon
3:55 - Don't eat grass. Humans don't have a digestive system which handles grass well :p
Lol
It also has Silica which is harmful to our teeth if im right
The human stomach isn't very fond of cellulose, which is the main component of standard grass. Humans only have one stomach, unfortunately, in order to digest grass properly one would need a couple of stomachs. But, who knows, maybe one day :p
@@TimRobertsen the farther we stray from nature the worst things get
@@TimRobertsen how about grass juice
1:06 LOVE the pokemon reference!
That ain’t magikarp that’s sorcerycod 💀
I’m playing Pokémon right now
what are you talking about, where are bears going to find berries in spring? There's no berries in spring lol
I think the major reason is the economical one you mention in your video - one should also keep in mind that mostly herbivoures breed more, and more easily than carnivoures. And this adds another level to the costs that you already stated. This also would be true for hunters - because it should definetely be more easy to locate a deer or a boar for than a wolf or lynx for shooting down.
Most of the carnivoures that are actively farmed (fish like salmon or amphibians like frogs) rely on Insects as food and this foodsource is quite easy to produce. The only farmed animal that is farmed and used for food is the Crocodile/Alligator, which relies on meat as food. But in this particular case I think the economical reason in this particular case is that they are not farmed for their meat, but for their skin, which sells at very high prices - so the meat is just a by-product.
Also, after the end of WW2, when the European countries lay in ruins, many people relied on cat-meat, because there was nothing else to eat. And even today there are countries where cat meat is still consumed. (Mostly in eastern asia and some south-american locations.)
Regarding the taste... as far as I know, there was a law in Germany directly after WW2, which required butchers to only sell rabbit meat 'whole' (i.e. the whole animal, and not some kind of sliced meat) because there were some cases where they sold cat meat as rabbit meat. If the taste would be that bad or so different from rabbit that people actually got cheated, that kind law would not be needed.
The religious aspect is a good one. I mean, everyone here in the western countries sees a dog as mans best friend, and wouldn't even dream of eating one. (What they forget is, that when they encounter a pack of wild dogs in the middle of nowhere, it is probably them who will be eaten, but that is a different story...).
Anyway, thank you for this great video!