Carl Jung |Synchronicity| audiobook
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 07. 2024
- Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle
C. G. JUNG
Join Channel Members and be featured on videos:
/ @logletter
Patreon - early access to audiobooks and be featured on videos:
/ logletter
Chapter 1:
02:48 Exposition
Chapter 2:
01:33:00 An Astrological Experiment
Chapter 3
02:20:10 Forerunners of the Idea of Synchronicity
Chapter 4:
02:59:22 Conclusion
#audiobook #carljung #synchronicity #psychology
Algorithm actually being helpful for once. Thank you friend
Algorithm will use this comment to recommend you even more
Synchronicity! Today I pulled this book off my shelf! 😮
I've had synchronicities that cannot be explained away! No matter what he says, there is no natural explanation.
🎉 I'll start this one when I finish Aion. Thank you for posting these!
I paused Aion to listen to this one.
The title suggests the central subject matter to be one of acausality, but that's precisely what it's not. Just because our finite powers of mind cannot draw connections in our familiar and limited way with certain phenomena does not necessitate that said phenomena are without reasonable substance. What is called synchronicity is indistinguishable from the very substrate and nature of existence, the fact that the mind blossoms more fully into the strangeness of said phenomena is also an unfoldment of ordination occuring on the surface of an inestimably deep body, from whose depths all such instances of coincidence rise in unfathomable complexity.
Say less
Lmao
Please stop attempting to project your beautiful 1:14 minds Finitnes unto the masses
You are absolutely right about that, but he was trying to dissolve a lot of bias of his time and had to pander a bit. You state one thing back-to-front, imo. It´s our powers of mind that HIDE this fact for us. Which is why it is easier to see on mushrooms or as a psychiatrist. I always suspected it, but never got into it, you need a higher intelligence than I was to properly see that, perhaps in a thousand years, people will laugh at the silliness of this discussion, (if youtube comments are somehow preserved). But yes, acausality (or Chaos or non-linear dynamics) is the source of causality, not the other way around (it is rule, rather than exception). Also the exception of causality only emerges after carefull selection of phenomena, which we do subconsciously. Consciousness ignores 90% of input to create a consistent "reality". One of the criteria for consistence is continuitiy (which can easliy be proven to be false, for instance we don´t experience the time of a blink, or of saccadic movement, which adds up to about an hour a day, then continuity is broken by sleep, which somehow doesn´t count) and another is causality, we ignore non-causal events or store them in memory until they can be resolved causally. This selection mechanism evolved into a species that has the brain as major weapon probably over the last million years. Only if we could see causality, we could exert influence, which is the function of the brain.. Like you rightly state, it´s our choices in grouping things into events, things and processes that causes causality and the tunnelvision and self-fullfilling prophecy of reductionism, which is what modern science has construed out of the much broader and holistic empiricism. If anything, bias is higher these days, as scientists garnered enormous bloated status and self-image by blatantly claiming the relative succes of engineering stemming from the industrial revolution and all forms of experimenting in the name of reductionism, hobbling along, making things "fit" with theories, that are discontinuous themselves and turning out to be fundamentally hogwash (persistence of th delta-paradox). The more raw intelligence you have, the easier it is to fall into this trap of filtering out mounting evidence, because the grouping is subconscious, but influenced by intelligence, it is as much nature as nurture.. I myself only saw it clearly after a stroke :) Now that I have regained much of my cognitive abiility, it is still undeniable and I aim to publish a paper about how to prove this in good reductionist fashion, showing it to be undeniable, and I will face the same biases ( if I live long enough, that is :)
Yo Løg, please upload some of the Jungian analyst / patient Marie Louise Von Franz - Would love personally to finally hear the rest of Puer Aeturnus and really anything else- there are a few on YT already, but she should always be included (unlike Freud besides maybe half of his dream interpretation book) in a journey through the work of Jung.
The only thing that explains what I've seen is that some events are caused by spirits.
Thank you so much for posting these!
Right off without listening yet I'll say the timing of things is impeccable.
Just what i needed❤️
Thanks for this one Boss 🤩
Thanks. For reading.
Thank you for this content
thank you
Great knowledge ❤❤
Thank you!!
Causality and synchronicity are arbitrary names for phenomena that both emerge from the circumstances as a strange attractor in non-linear dynamic system,,both can be modeled, as I intend to show in my upcoming paper. But this might actually have influenced its structure,might be time for a rewrite. This is a good structure, when you are up against a lot of bias and have to be multidisciplinary as a default. I´m also interested how this paper was received, especially by physicists. Such serendipitous timing :)
Great videos ,is it possible we get Memories,Reflections,Dreams and maybe some Manly P Hall?
Holy shit; information dense. Thanks so much 😊😊😊
Sweet, man this channel rules
Every time you say "uh-causal" instead of "ay-causal" I have an aneurysm
You mean an Uh-neurism? Lol
Can you please do mysterium conunctionis?
Yes, there is nothing a acausal about life
Could you do The Red Book by Carl Jung?
Retorical bullshit !!! Out with it !!!
Ain’t no way… tell me why I clicked on this video and it had 888 likes😮
Mandela Effect is the real deal
What a phenomenal mind. I can barely comprehend anything this guy says
Gotta start slow with this stuff. I would start with a book on Jung written by another man, Joseph Campbell- in which he basically breaks everything down into digestible ideas in the foot notes. 3 of Jung’s books are in it as well
It wasn't just his mind that was phenomenonal. He lived an incredibly interesting life. I've found that having an in-depth background of his life has helped comprehend his books and talks. Humble-U media also has some great videos explaining the books
Slow down the speech
thank you