I'd like to watch a video on impressionists! Although I don't know enough about art history to make a choice between the two subjects. So, I hope to watch something on both :) Your videos are great :)
Some links that might help: www.moma.org/collection/details.php?theme_id=10459 www.guggenheim.org/new-york/exhibitions/publications/from-the-archives/items/view/72 On Frank Stella: www.guggenheim.org/new-york/collections/collection-online/artists/bios/809 brooklynrail.org/2012/11/artseen/frank-stella-the-retrospective-works-1958-2012 And try looking at your nearest library for books :) good luck!
That's a good question. Malevich and Mondrian both produced art that looks very simple. The principal difference between them and the minimalists seems to be that both of the earlier painters had a rather mystical streak, and their abstract arrangements of pigment on canvas were guided by programmatic ideas (Suprematisn, neoplasticism, even theosophy) that went beyond pure aesthetics. Stella seems to have believed that in 'Die Fahne höch' he was creating an object that was devoid of referred meaning or symbolism: "what you see is what you see" (1964). Personally, I doubt whether such a thing is possible, since colours, shape, scale and materials will always have implications for viewers that the artist can't control. Viewers might also ask why Stella - if his intention was truly to eliminate any hint of expressionism - drew his stripes freehand rather than masking the edges the give a clean line. The choice of title - from the Nazi Horst Wessel Lied - also refers well beyond itself.
I use your videos to study for my art tests in uni :)))))
Your channel is just so brilliant. Thank you for doing what you do. I learn so much and they make me so happy.
Thanks so much! Your comment makes me so happy :D
I love the way you explain art/artists
I appreciate your video on this subject; well done ✅. I love minimalist art as it portrays a certain amount of order in the defined lines.
Nice work! Thank you for the reference to Michael Fried's “Art and Objecthood” (1967).
You have a great voice! I'm currently using this to study for a class :)
Super
very helpful! thank you so much !
Thanks for watching!
I'd like to watch a video on impressionists! Although I don't know enough about art history to make a choice between the two subjects. So, I hope to watch something on both :) Your videos are great :)
Sounds like a plan! :) Thanks Émile
Thank you!
I like your page. I work in contemporary art and looking your videos gives a good resume on what's good there is to know ;) Continue!
+L libs Thank you L libs!
Pleasee... I need help... Our teacher wants us to make a minimalist art and i dont know what im going to create 😭😭
Cool art history lesson
great video, great help for my project :) what sight or book did you use to get all the information from?
Some links that might help:
www.moma.org/collection/details.php?theme_id=10459
www.guggenheim.org/new-york/exhibitions/publications/from-the-archives/items/view/72
On Frank Stella:
www.guggenheim.org/new-york/collections/collection-online/artists/bios/809
brooklynrail.org/2012/11/artseen/frank-stella-the-retrospective-works-1958-2012
And try looking at your nearest library for books :) good luck!
How do you remember all that? ☺
Having a script helps! :P
How come minimalism tried to go to the lowest art possible when the suprematism did the same but even simpler?
That's a good question. Malevich and Mondrian both produced art that looks very simple. The principal difference between them and the minimalists seems to be that both of the earlier painters had a rather mystical streak, and their abstract arrangements of pigment on canvas were guided by programmatic ideas (Suprematisn, neoplasticism, even theosophy) that went beyond pure aesthetics.
Stella seems to have believed that in 'Die Fahne höch' he was creating an object that was devoid of referred meaning or symbolism: "what you see is what you see" (1964). Personally, I doubt whether such a thing is possible, since colours, shape, scale and materials will always have implications for viewers that the artist can't control.
Viewers might also ask why Stella - if his intention was truly to eliminate any hint of expressionism - drew his stripes freehand rather than masking the edges the give a clean line. The choice of title - from the Nazi Horst Wessel Lied - also refers well beyond itself.
this is a fantastic little art talk - just GREAT
Impressionists, please! But then again, why not both? Muaha
Definitely will get to both eventually!!!
I’m sorry to point this out, but you are quoting the Wikipedia entry on Stella, almost verbatim, and without proper credit.
super 111
Necesito esto en español jajaja pero bueno :/
Frank Stella is, not was