We aren't all like this guy I've been doing security since 1996 and i know the law says you can film anywhere when I get asked to move someone on i actually tell them we cant do anything to stop them some don't know this law and are scared of being sacked for not doing their duties ie.doing what they are told to do
That's offensive I've been doing Security for 23 years I know the law on photography I would never harass someone in public for doing a legal activity Guards should be trained to know the law
I was in the security sector for a long time, I pulled out after seeing all this kind of nonsense. We have MI5 and 6, customs and border force, police , army, navy patrols, drones, satellites, CCTV command centres, license plate detectors. Scotland Yard. Sniffer dogs, bomb disposal. Interpol. UN google earth, and somehow the four day SIA trained guard is part of this war on terror effort? Let's keep on top of those photographers.
security guard as well, told my co workers that it was legal for the guy to film in public on the sidewalk, my superivosr came up wanted us to make him move, I told him that this was public they all grabbed him escorted him away, I did not the police came arrested all of them not me when I told the head boss what happened after having to make a statement to the police, he fired me
Can security at say a privately owned shopping retail park, ask someone to stop filming? And/or ask the said person(photographer) to leave the site? Is it classed as a non-public area?
@@DesertRat63You will find retail parks are private land including the car parks so they can stop you from filming. Its when you are on public land they have no rights to stop you filming.
I worked closely with the AOP (association of photographers) UK while I worked in London and within the photo industry over the years 04-16. This was a recurring problem and they offered courses to deal with such harassment. They are an amazing organisation and only have their members best interests at heart
I can identify two of these security guards .One in the suit is Howard Brown a former branch manager of the Halifax Bank,the chap in the hi viz is none other than George Agddgdgwngo,a prolific phone scammer with links to the National Bank Of Uganda.Approach these two with extreme caution.
When will these power hungry security ever learn? They have no power outside of that building regarding Photography! I look forward to the day they do this to someone who is prepared to take these fools to court! Well done for staying calm, I would have told them to eff off lol.
A person who tells security to fuck off when they are trying to infringe on that person's liberty and freedom is now a Gangster?? In North Korea maybe?
MrKdizzle09 So now you're bein a dramatic fuck in sayin that someone must feel like a tough guy eh? It's called rights. And I wouldn't be a damned bit surprised that you have no clue what that means it what they are. Grab a book now and again.
There is a guy on CZcams from Wakefield who did just that with the police. He got an undisclosed sum of compensation after they arrested him SIX times.
are all security companies in London employing foreigners? If they are concerned about the security of OUR capital surely they will employ British Nationals.
vindicari If you ever did security you'll know how hard it is. Why else are foreigners are doing it because it's a hard shop and we British citizens only want the polite easy jobs
Cooliomix yeah security is not hard work mate, if you think that standing around or sitting down all day is hard work then you need a real job like a labour on a building site, but I guess only the lazy English want that kind of job.
I do this myself sometimes. Best is to photocopy THE LAW regarding filming in public spaces. Then when any cops/security turn up just hand them a copy with the words" please read this and keep it" (print loads of them as you may have to hand a good few out and they love to refuse to hand back your copies if they think that angers you). Its a bit hard for them to argue then with the LAW clearly stating you CAN film.
I'm noticing a distinct similarity in all these interactions. None of the people approaching you ever introduce themselves. I have a personal interaction requirement for any stranger approaching me or speaking with me. They must first introduce themselves. If they don't, I ask them to do so and inquire why they did not initially.
MANNERS????? What is WRONG with you??? Lol. Being polite and having good manners has all but disappeared. Its a shame. Still even today, when I call someone on the cell phone, which identifies me anyway, first thing out of my mouth, "this is Russ". Simple manners.
Well done and thanks for your work in showing others how to protect your rights and how corporations and company security think company policy overrides the law.
The moment you said “they are for my private collection,” she was lost, she had nowhere to go. She was instantly defeated. Because all the weapons she had planned to deploy depended on you saying you were going to publish the video or make commercial gain or broadcast it or something like that. But private collections can never be placed into any of these categorise. So job done. Battle won. She can kick rocks.!
Dear Colleagues Guidance for Photographers I am writing to you in my capacity as Chair of the ACPO Communications Advisory Group which sits in the Presidential Business Area. There have been a number of recent instances highlighted in the press where officers have detained photographers and deleted images from their cameras. I seek your support in reminding your officers and staff that they should not prevent anyone from taking photographs in public. This applies equally to members of the media and public seeking to record images, who do not need a permit to photograph or film in public places. ACPO guidance is as follows: There are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place. Therefore members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so. We need to cooperate with the media and amateur photographers. They play a vital role as their images help us identify criminals. We must acknowledge that citizen journalism is a feature of modern life and police officers are now photographed and filmed more than ever. Unnecessarily restricting photography, whether for the casual tourist or professional is unacceptable and it undermines public confidence in the police service. Once an image has been recorded, the police have no power to delete or confiscate it without a court order. If you require further guidance please refer to the ACPO website or contact my Staff Officer Robin Edwards at robin.edwards@btp.pnn.police.uk.
raj haha raj I'm a Turk born in London never claim to be British and not on any benefits I'm doing good don't know what you on about where you from then mate?
The problem is the training given to security guards is nowhere near enough! Four days in a classroom listening to an ex bouncer talk about himself for 8 hours is the reason more than 80% of people I have worked with within the security industry have done and said things similar to the people on this video. It's embarrassing the amount of "supervisors" you come across who have absolutely no idea what's what in terms of law.
I'm not a tourist, I'm a photographer What is the point of taking pictures? i sometimes wonder if they train them to pretend to be this stupid just to get the opponent tired and leave or if it's a natural talent ;D
I have been a security guard for a few years now. Got to say all the sites i have worked at Think that NO ONE has the right to take pics of their site. On a Public place EVERYONE has
Billyg215 The fact of the matter is, some managers are easily irked, and use their private rentacops to carry out their dirty work for them. I too work in security, and have been moved off sites because I have pointed out when managers are in the wrong, over issues of the law, and health and safety. I know my limitations, and refuse to stray outside of them, for a poxy £8 an hour. It often pisses managers off, that I dont always comply with their petty requests, but I coukdn't really give a fuck, so long as I know i'm right. Managers have requested my removal from a few sites, because I am nobody's lacky. But I still have my job. I have never been sacked by my security provider employer..
I wish that police and security personal would stop calling everyone MATE. They used to say SIR or MADAM. I am not someone's MATE, unless he is a friend.
No offence but most of the security guards where`nt Brits. So i guess they where told by their by management . What we say is law. IS IT FK. BELIEVE ME I know
No, but they are supposed to have on display their SIA licence unless they are conducting undercover or close protection work. Even if it is on display, they have no obligation to show members of public the licence though.
Judging by the accents we have a West African man and an East European woman telling a British guy that what he is doing is not allowed, despite him explaining that he is acting within the law. "Is it me?" These so called security firms, charge companies a fortune for a service and then get anyone they can from agencies. No security checks are done, not background checks are done and no training is done. Well done for standing your ground and showing them up for their complete lack of knowledge.
Sorry, thumbs down. The UK has been doing that for centuries and were quite brutal at it. Remember the colonies? Playing the race card is stupid in this case. This guy is just ignorant or misinformed.
I've been out of work for a while but need a job desperately. Security is my last option. I'll fail at it because I'll do the job right not like these pratts
My advice to any photographer faced with this situation is to simply go online, go to google maps, street view and show the security guy the building is on the internet and images are publicly available around the world also ask if they have contacted Google and told them they cant photograph the building? The security guy said its security and some say it's because of the high terror alert, rubbish, anyone planning something illegal would simply look at google street view and not put themselves at risk by being spotted and recorded by the security cameras the building has pointing out to the street and recording incent people without there permission
@Second Bhom So you are against the conquests of the past Islamic empire, and their tyranny taking over numerous countries. Glad we know where you stand. Or are you just against the past conquests of white nations? Because, that is the definition of racism.
The Power of Futility: I enjoy photography and have been photographing for 40 years, and have read many many books, seen many many images, watched many many documentaries, and have very high regard for photographers, photojournalists, journalists, reporters and cameramen/women and correspondents. These people are the pawn who pawn their lives to bring salable news to the news desks of news agencies with the hopes that what they are doing will change the outcome of the moments that they have captured to show, Many times, they lose their lives, the photos survive, the worlds and the people of the world never learn anything from the photos, the photographs however remarkable and compelling never change anything, business as usual, these are books, exhibitions, retrospectives, tributes, recognitions, awards, accolades, special reposts, interviews, but nothing ever changes the minds and hearts of heartless and stubborn human-beings and ignorant and idiotic politicians and egotistical leaders leading the masses of ignorant and powerless flocks. Never and newer and more sophisticated lenses and cameras are made but none ave the capacity or power to bring about change, only the reposting gets better and better with more resolutions and clarity and vivid colors but nothing changes. The photographers and reporters break-down and get broken by the futility. Museums and libraries too make no difference, what power can a journal or journalist or image have, images are prohibited, and photography is prohibited, evidence destroyed, nations and people destroyed proving what?
You would hope the companies who employ people who interact with the public would have the most basic understanding of the publics rights.to film. Up to the present the security is really pissnpoor and an embarrassment the those who vet them and employ them
Alan Peters Most of the time, the guys are just acting on instruction from their clueless site managers. Granted, there are some little hitlers around who take their perception of what they THINK is within their remit to dizzying heights. But most are just trying to hold onto their jobs, by complying with the wishes of their clients.
When they come out to speak to you tell them “you have no legal right or authority to tell me or any one else what I can or can not do in a public street” there job is with in the property they work in and not OUTSIDE!
I would love it if next time they say "it's a private building, we don't like photographs being taken of it" for you to simply ask them : "Why build such a large private building in a very public place if you do not wish it to be photographed? You chose to have your building in the most public of places, so it can't be all that private? (in the sense of confidential / secretive not in terms of private ownership). It just strikes me as rather odd that all of these 'private' buildings are in the most public of areas xD like what.
I have worked in this industry for 18 years and these people have no idea,if it was company policy to not allow photography of the building I would inform them of that and ask them not to,if they said "no I'll carry on" I would say " that's fine as I can't legally stop you"and that would be the end of it
To become a security guard you have to fail an intelligence test.
I can do that.
We aren't all like this guy I've been doing security since 1996 and i know the law says you can film anywhere when I get asked to move someone on i actually tell them we cant do anything to stop them some don't know this law and are scared of being sacked for not doing their duties ie.doing what they are told to do
You forgot, as well you really need to have a Low IQ to be a POLICE officer..😁
Wow they take a test haha
That's offensive I've been doing Security for 23 years I know the law on photography I would never harass someone in public for doing a legal activity Guards should be trained to know the law
They never learn. They walk to the camera then complain about being filmed. lol
I've watched this loads of times and it never fails to make me laugh. Thick as fuck security. Just wish there was more like this. 👍
I was in the security sector for a long time, I pulled out after seeing all this kind of nonsense.
We have MI5 and 6, customs and border force, police , army, navy patrols, drones, satellites, CCTV command centres, license plate detectors. Scotland Yard. Sniffer dogs, bomb disposal. Interpol. UN google earth, and somehow the four day SIA trained guard is part of this war on terror effort? Let's keep on top of those photographers.
security guard as well, told my co workers that it was legal for the guy to film in public on the sidewalk, my superivosr came up wanted us to make him move, I told him that this was public they all grabbed him escorted him away, I did not the police came arrested all of them not me when I told the head boss what happened after having to make a statement to the police, he fired me
@@altha-rf1et probably better off not working for an asshole company. you can hold your head high knowing you did the right thing. good on ya.
Can security at say a privately owned shopping retail park, ask someone to stop filming? And/or ask the said person(photographer) to leave the site? Is it classed as a non-public area?
@@DesertRat63You will find retail parks are private land including the car parks so they can stop you from filming. Its when you are on public land they have no rights to stop you filming.
They just seem stunned by your answers. "Our policy is no filming" The law allows me to film in public.
Good on you mate, big companies thinking they can dictate to the man on the street!
Put a suit on a security guard, and they're still just a security guard.
😂😂
If you put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig.
That have no authority over you in public.
I worked closely with the AOP (association of photographers) UK while I worked in London and within the photo industry over the years 04-16. This was a recurring problem and they offered courses to deal with such harassment. They are an amazing organisation and only have their members best interests at heart
I can identify two of these security guards .One in the suit is Howard Brown a former branch manager of the Halifax Bank,the chap in the hi viz is none other than George Agddgdgwngo,a prolific phone scammer with links to the National Bank Of Uganda.Approach these two with extreme caution.
LOL !
😂
Hi viz guy was nicer then the other wankstains
“Hellooooo, you have won $10,000 in Ugandan lottery, can I have your bank detaiiiiils! 😂🤣😂
Tree Monkeys The fucking lot of them Just tell em to FUCK OFF!
There is no expectation of privacy in public that's the law.
Tell the foreign security guards that,
They haven't got a fuck clue about the law !
GO BACK TO ZAMBEZI LEARN THE LAW BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH
goodness me....I've had exactly the same conversation with security! You just need to be confident that you know the law.
When will these power hungry security ever learn? They have no power outside of that building regarding Photography! I look forward to the day they do this to someone who is prepared to take these fools to court!
Well done for staying calm, I would have told them to eff off lol.
GunnyUKsarge what a right gangster you must be telling security to fuck off
A person who tells security to fuck off when they are trying to infringe on that person's liberty and freedom is now a Gangster?? In North Korea maybe?
Kim Jong Un is the BIGGEST gangster in the world!
MrKdizzle09 So now you're bein a dramatic fuck in sayin that someone must feel like a tough guy eh? It's called rights. And I wouldn't be a damned bit surprised that you have no clue what that means it what they are. Grab a book now and again.
There is a guy on CZcams from Wakefield who did just that with the police. He got an undisclosed sum of compensation after they arrested him SIX times.
I really LOVE these videos seeing them squirm and wholeheartedly believe that their Managers ‘policy’ overrides United Kingdom Law. It’s just funny
Love nonsense from matt everyone
@@matimus100 what?
are all security companies in London employing foreigners? If they are concerned about the security of OUR capital surely they will employ British Nationals.
vindicari
If you ever did security you'll know how hard it is. Why else are foreigners are doing it because it's a hard shop and we British citizens only want the polite easy jobs
I hear that South Africans are quite good at telling people what to do
@@DayyyumSon securety a hard job ? hahaha lazyest job ever
even if somthing hapens al thy do is call the police lol
Cooliomix yeah security is not hard work mate, if you think that standing around or sitting down all day is hard work then you need a real job like a labour on a building site, but I guess only the lazy English want that kind of job.
What with all these foreigner security guards?.
I do this myself sometimes. Best is to photocopy THE LAW regarding filming in public spaces. Then when any cops/security turn up just hand them a copy with the words" please read this and keep it" (print loads of them as you may have to hand a good few out and they love to refuse to hand back your copies if they think that angers you). Its a bit hard for them to argue then with the LAW clearly stating you CAN film.
Fantastic work mate ! You stood your ground ! Good man . Nice job. Love to see more of your great videos . Keep em coming .🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Prince Andrew loves this nonsense comment
Clearly they just don't know the rules, perhaps read some law they think again security and managers.!!!
In a way, it's kind of comforting to know that security in the U.K. are about as clueless as security in the U.S.
If the building is private and dont like photos taken off it then why dont they put a giant cloak over it ?
I'm noticing a distinct similarity in all these interactions. None of the people approaching you ever introduce themselves. I have a personal interaction requirement for any stranger approaching me or speaking with me. They must first introduce themselves. If they don't, I ask them to do so and inquire why they did not initially.
MANNERS????? What is WRONG with you??? Lol. Being polite and having good manners has all but disappeared. Its a shame. Still even today, when I call someone on the cell phone, which identifies me anyway, first thing out of my mouth, "this is Russ". Simple manners.
Is it normal that security guards have bad English??? I'm dutch and my English is better then the security guards I see in this video, weird .
Johnny D would much rather have the Dutch over here than these idiots🇬🇧🙄
It's because they employ illegals straight off the dinghy
Go back to ZAMBEZI
In truth, most Dutch people have better English than the English!
im going out today doing this outside a sweet factory.. im going to ask them for a big bag of sweets if they want me to move
You gave them far too much information, you don't have to explain anything, just tell them to go away, end of story.
Wouldn't be half as entertaining if he did as you suggest, though.😄
Well done, us photographers must stand our ground
Obviously they never bothered with the legal requirement to display their blue SIA licences.
They don't understand British law Bless em
Superstitious nonsense comment
Maybe they shouldn’t make the entire entrance wall out of glass 🤣🤣🤣
I see that I was not the only one focused on the *_Camel Toe_*!!!
:
More like a whole camel
Did you lick the screen?
More like an elephant's foot
Well done you are doing a great job,these idiots should swat up on the law.
Well done and thanks for your work in showing others how to protect your rights and how corporations and company security think company policy overrides the law.
The moment you said “they are for my private collection,” she was lost, she had nowhere to go. She was instantly defeated. Because all the weapons she had planned to deploy depended on you saying you were going to publish the video or make commercial gain or broadcast it or something like that. But private collections can never be placed into any of these categorise. So job done. Battle won. She can kick rocks.!
Why are you entering into dialogue? Film what you want and ignore them!
CAMEL TOE!!!!
Did you lick the screen?
@Mike p... I did
@@steveakam me too at 4:40 the drewling started
I’m kind of a MOOSE Knuckle kind of guy.... but she wares the pants very nicely though.
Yuk
I always enjoy these videos from the UK. I would love to see some videos covering the laws about these issues for your country.
Bunny Boots Ink less aggressive but very ignorant over seas lol
Dear Colleagues
Guidance for Photographers
I am writing to you in my capacity as Chair of the ACPO Communications Advisory Group which sits in the Presidential Business Area.
There have been a number of recent instances highlighted in the press where officers have detained photographers and deleted images from their cameras. I seek your support in reminding your officers and staff that they should not prevent anyone from taking photographs in public. This applies equally to members of the media and public seeking to record images, who do not need a permit to photograph or film in public places. ACPO guidance is as follows:
There are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place. Therefore members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so. We need to cooperate with the media and amateur photographers. They play a vital role as their images help us identify criminals. We must acknowledge that citizen journalism is a feature of modern life and police officers are now photographed and filmed more than ever. Unnecessarily restricting photography, whether for the casual tourist or professional is unacceptable and it undermines public confidence in the police service. Once an image has been recorded, the police have no power to delete or confiscate it without a court order.
If you require further guidance please refer to the ACPO website or contact my Staff Officer Robin Edwards at robin.edwards@btp.pnn.police.uk.
Policy only applies to employees and those in contract with the business.
Finally, I hear what I've said before - Company Policy only applies to employees of that company, not to anybody else.
These people aren't even English and they are telling English people they can't film in their own country.
30.000 cameras in the uk and u can't film ha ha ha and all these guards* foreigners* *keep filming bro piss em off*
30,000? My small town of hastings has 50-60,000, bit of an underestimation there
Makes me laff we security guards that look like the terrorists we are guarding against...
cant take a shit in piece
More than 60.000 CCTV cameras.
actually it is 5.9 million CCTV surveillance cameras
I understand her position--DOGGY and COWGIRL
That's got to be the best Camel Toe vid on CZcams !
They’re scumbags of the highest order. Good on you for standing your ground.
Do ANY British people work in London?
badgern100 of course, there are a great many Brits as well as people from other ethnic backgrounds working in London
They have all ran away to Essex and Kent unfortunately this coming from a Turk 😂 it's turn into a big village full of villagers
Yes the prime minister
raj like all the Indians in council homes renting out right Ragesh
raj haha raj I'm a Turk born in London never claim to be British and not on any benefits I'm doing good don't know what you on about where you from then mate?
If security knew the law then they wouldn't respond inappropriately so the guy would not hang around too long.
If security men knew the law they wouldnt be security men !
The problem is the training given to security guards is nowhere near enough! Four days in a classroom listening to an ex bouncer talk about himself for 8 hours is the reason more than 80% of people I have worked with within the security industry have done and said things similar to the people on this video. It's embarrassing the amount of "supervisors" you come across who have absolutely no idea what's what in terms of law.
@@daynegilbey2462 that's if you take the door supervisor course if you just done the Security guard one it's two days
That security lady is more of a security risk than the cameraman😂😇
I'm not a tourist, I'm a photographer
What is the point of taking pictures?
i sometimes wonder if they train them to pretend to be this stupid just to get the opponent tired and leave or if it's a natural talent ;D
I have been a security guard for a few years now. Got to say all the sites i have worked at Think that NO ONE has the right to take pics of their site. On a Public place EVERYONE has
Billyg215 same here. The level of ignorance and stupidity in management is scary
Billyg215 The fact of the matter is, some managers are easily irked, and use their private rentacops to carry out their dirty work for them.
I too work in security, and have been moved off sites because I have pointed out when managers are in the wrong, over issues of the law, and health and safety. I know my limitations, and refuse to stray outside of them, for a poxy £8 an hour.
It often pisses managers off, that I dont always comply with their petty requests, but I coukdn't really give a fuck, so long as I know i'm right.
Managers have requested my removal from a few sites, because I am nobody's lacky. But I still have my job. I have never been sacked by my security provider employer..
Well done for standing your ground mate!👍🏻
Excellent video compilation.
I wish that police and security personal would stop calling everyone MATE. They used to say SIR or MADAM. I am not someone's MATE, unless he is a friend.
If a security guard stays with you, isn't that basically harassment?
Section 4 public order offence... behaviour likely to cause alarm or distress.
that was great man nice one
I’m a seasoned loss Prevention manager who recently got made redundant please employ me to advise these people on the law
No offence but most of the security guards where`nt Brits. So i guess they where told by their by management . What we say is law. IS IT FK. BELIEVE ME I know
Billy was one of the guys not speaking English. That’s how he knows. 😂🤣😂 Played with my mind just reading it.
Why is that it's always Jonny foreigner who say we can film or take photos here.seem to think they know / are better than the law of UK .??????
Dont private security need to be displaying there number.?
No, but they are supposed to have on display their SIA licence unless they are conducting undercover or close protection work. Even if it is on display, they have no obligation to show members of public the licence though.
i miss these you should do more of these :) you pushed the boundarys of the system :)
Thanks for the nice crouch shot on grey suit 👌
Foreigners telling and Englishman he cant take photos in his homeland😂😂😂😂😂
Says the English drug dealer...
"The thing about it is..ah hold on sec while I use my single brain cell to make up something you might be stupid enough to believe...."
ALL SECURITY SHOULD HAVE VISABLE IDENTITY
Judging by the accents we have a West African man and an East European woman telling a British guy that what he is doing is not allowed, despite him explaining that he is acting within the law.
"Is it me?"
These so called security firms, charge companies a fortune for a service and then get anyone they can from agencies. No security checks are done, not background checks are done and no training is done.
Well done for standing your ground and showing them up for their complete lack of knowledge.
GREAT VIDEO, AS ALWAYS
+ajh90210 thanks mate
immigrants need to no the law before they get given security jobs
No, they need to "know" the law.
yes lets act like this issue is immigrant related shall we
bri jones it's not migrant related its foreigners who are unaware of uk law.
bri jones grammar much?
ACE RODRIGUEZ lel
Interesting scenario. Hate when people say have authority but don't.
I'm security, I know every thing. They are clearly totally ignorant.
Hahahahaha i see these 2 clowns every day
She's getting lippy
Nice suits I bet Primark do a roaring trade in failed copper suits.
So sad ,just found you after years of us clips had an expectation of a better quality of service
Another foreigner comes out to tell a British person what he cannot do on British soil.
Nick Turner i know its bloody cheek!!!, i quite agree, what the hell has happened to england at least the england i once knew!! God preserve us.
thats what i thought
Sorry, thumbs down. The UK has been doing that for centuries and were quite brutal at it. Remember the colonies? Playing the race card is stupid in this case. This guy is just ignorant or misinformed.
@@svenguinee1072 If colonialism is wrong, then it is wrong. If it is right, then it is right. Make up your mind. You can't have it both ways.
UKIP much mate?
When you've failed at life you become a security guard
I've been out of work for a while but need a job desperately. Security is my last option. I'll fail at it because I'll do the job right not like these pratts
Well the only way is up
At 3:59 that 'security' woman sounds like my biology teacher
My advice to any photographer faced with this situation is to simply go online, go to google maps, street view and show the security guy the building is on the internet and images are publicly available around the world also ask if they have contacted Google and told them they cant photograph the building? The security guy said its security and some say it's because of the high terror alert, rubbish, anyone planning something illegal would simply look at google street view and not put themselves at risk by being spotted and recorded by the security cameras the building has pointing out to the street and recording incent people without there permission
And don't come to My country and tell me what to do.
@nige bray oh fuck off you racist
@Second Bhom So you are against the conquests of the past Islamic empire, and their tyranny taking over numerous countries. Glad we know where you stand.
Or are you just against the past conquests of white nations? Because, that is the definition of racism.
You film me I can film in public.
The Power of Futility: I enjoy photography and have been photographing for 40 years, and have read many many books, seen many many images, watched many many documentaries, and have very high regard for photographers, photojournalists, journalists, reporters and cameramen/women and correspondents. These people are the pawn who pawn their lives to bring salable news to the news desks of news agencies with the hopes that what they are doing will change the outcome of the moments that they have captured to show, Many times, they lose their lives, the photos survive, the worlds and the people of the world never learn anything from the photos, the photographs however remarkable and compelling never change anything, business as usual, these are books, exhibitions, retrospectives, tributes, recognitions, awards, accolades, special reposts, interviews, but nothing ever changes the minds and hearts of heartless and stubborn human-beings and ignorant and idiotic politicians and egotistical leaders leading the masses of ignorant and powerless flocks. Never and newer and more sophisticated lenses and cameras are made but none ave the capacity or power to bring about change, only the reposting gets better and better with more resolutions and clarity and vivid colors but nothing changes. The photographers and reporters break-down and get broken by the futility. Museums and libraries too make no difference, what power can a journal or journalist or image have, images are prohibited, and photography is prohibited, evidence destroyed, nations and people destroyed proving what?
Don't walk up to a *CAMERA* when you don't want to be filmed
You would hope the companies who employ people who interact with the public would have the most basic understanding of the publics rights.to film. Up to the present the security is really pissnpoor and an embarrassment the those who vet them and employ them
Alan Peters Most of the time, the guys are just acting on instruction from their clueless site managers. Granted, there are some little hitlers around who take their perception of what they THINK is within their remit to dizzying heights. But most are just trying to hold onto their jobs, by complying with the wishes of their clients.
why would you even discuss with them
Best candid video ever
Great work, keep it up man!
wonder how tight her kitty kat is?
Gilbert Grape I was thinking exactly the same. was a nice view tho.
Probably one of them "2x4" broads!! Lol
Bloody foreigner, comes here, and tells local he can't film??????? WTF.
jane armstrong are you assuming because he/she has an accent, he/she is a foreigner? But then, you wouldn’t be so stupid would you?
If it's not white and does not speak with a British accent. then yes it is a foreigner, and should fk off...
its the same fucking thing in u.s.a. with immigrant that are hired as security
These 'security' people Never find out about the law first, do they, as the police say " just following Orders"?
my thoughts exactly. the UK is such an easy touch it's sickening. foreigners come into our country and disrespect us. BREXIT !!!!
Those security staff have no duristiction outside of that building.
G4S? More brains on the end of a butcher’s pencil!
4:30 - Camel Toe at 3 o' clock!
When they come out to speak to you tell them “you have no legal right or authority to tell me or any one else what I can or can not do in a public street” there job is with in the property they work in and not OUTSIDE!
was this London or did we visit Africa and Poland along the way?
Four and half minutes in is the best part of the video
I would love it if next time they say "it's a private building, we don't like photographs being taken of it" for you to simply ask them :
"Why build such a large private building in a very public place if you do not wish it to be photographed? You chose to have your building in the most public of places, so it can't be all that private? (in the sense of confidential / secretive not in terms of private ownership).
It just strikes me as rather odd that all of these 'private' buildings are in the most public of areas xD like what.
You love so easy
I have worked in this industry for 18 years and these people have no idea,if it was company policy to not allow photography of the building I would inform them of that and ask them not to,if they said "no I'll carry on" I would say " that's fine as I can't legally stop you"and that would be the end of it
Photography is not a crime but harassing a photographer is
They make it up as they go along and expect you to clear off.
That has made me larf. I can't remember the last time I did.
04:24 That Stringfellows' poster on the van, plus the Polish bird's camel toe, is making me "consider her position".
Can you imagine a black part time security guard trying this in the USA 🇺🇸 🤔
Wow, watching this in 2023.... How times have changed. Police were civil and knew the law, but now...