World Population 10000 BC - 2021 (adjusted to present day boundaries)
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2022
- In this video we estimate the early world population from 10000 BC to 2021 relative to present day countries boundaries. Data is based on historical censuses and archaeological findings projection.
Source:
10,000 BCE to 1799: HYDE Version 3.2 The very ambitious HYDE database (History database of the Global Environment) is maintained by researchers at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
1800 to 1949: Gapminder Version 6. Gapminder maintains a population dataset based on data from Angus Maddison and CLIO INFRA, that we use as our source for the period from 1800 to 1949. Their documentation provides the following details on their sources.
1950 to 2021: UN World Population Prospects. We rely on the latest issue of the United Nations World Population Prospects as our main source for recent historical data and future projections. We use this data for its reliability, its consistent methods, and because it includes population estimates for almost all territories in the world. The UN updates its dataset every 2 years.
Music: Civilization 6, Arabia Theme
*******
I use Alien Art Charts to make those videos, use this link alienart.io/?referer=626917e1... to make similar videos as mine.
*******
Please feel free to follow gozhda_stats on instagram and tiktok.
*******
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Reference:
support.google.com/youtube/th...
www.multiplechronicconditions...
bit.ly/3l8GUbc
Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976:
www.copyright.gov/fair-use/mo...
www.copyright.gov/title17/92c...
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is not transformative in nature. - Věda a technologie
So sad to see the decimation of the giants Mexico and Brazil as soon as the Americas were “discovered”.
@@TA.PA..78 that’s why I put quotations
@María Garcia
They killed them
@@yfcbvvef7886 😢
@@yfcbvvef7886 Portugal and Spain today: 🗿🍷
The shout and central America: We are poore
@María Garcia stop your propoganda
The population in ancient China was much higher than that shown in the video, because there was a serious under-reporting of population in ancient China. This phenomenon was not alleviated until 1750 when the Qing government issued the policy of allocating the population to mu. You can see in the video that the population of China suddenly tripled around 1750, and that's because the under-reported population was counted
Tbh these are really population reconstructions, before 1900 there is no way to 100% get accurate measurements so proxies and other methods are used so there is uncertainty. But nonetheless this is interesting to watch still.
that is because the high yield corn and sweet potatoes was introduced to China at that time ,and China lived without war was a big reason too .
I think this is a Indian channel 😂
The entire video is speculation and shouldn't be taken seriously
whites was in China part of it first ,why many Chinese are light color
There was legend who said if China and India lost their 1 billion people they would still be most populous nations at 1st and 2nd
That's true because both have more than 1.4 billion people....take out a billion and they got more than 400 million each....The 3rd most populated US has somewhat between 300 and 400 million so yeah they're still top 2
king of baby maker
@@khair0226but fertility rates are less
India has fertility rates on average of 2.0
China has Even less 1.1 😮
Middle east has 3.0
Africa has 4
@@blueworld9706 Yea china has a 1-child-policity
Also India has 2.2, not 2.0 (which would be zero growth).
But indeed, africa has the fastest growing population in the world. What is interesting to think about also, is, how much people could maximally live somewhere? And, to say so: for North america it is 2.2 Billion, South america 2.9 Billion, Europe 1.6 Billion, Africa ~6.5 Billion, Asia 9.4 Billion and for Oceania (Australia) (including Indonesia) it is 1.3 Billion people, so in total: 23.9 Billion. Of course, life standards would have to be norminized, no "luxus"-products and no "useless" products where "good" ones could grow.
@@khair0226 INDIA BIRTH RATE IS PERFECT AND ITS JUST 2.0 STOP UR WHITE RACISM,INDIA AND CHINA HAVE HIGHER POPUALTION BEOCZ,FROM THE STRARTING OF TIME,PEOPLE SETTLED HERE DUE TO BETTER AGRICULTURE AND ALL,INFACT INDIA AND CHINA HAD THE LEAST OVERALL GROWHT,TODAY THEY HAVE MOST POPUALTION BECOZ HISTORICALLY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THERE IN CHINA AND INDIA AND ,PEOPLE GREW MUCH GOOD AGRICULTURE AND WATER WAS PLENTY AND CLIMATE WAS TROPICAL,AND ALSO IN INDIA AND CHINA PEOPLE ARE CONCENTRATED AT CERTAIN AREAS,IN CHINA THE WESTERN SIDE AND TIBET ARE EMPTY BECOZ OF ARID LAND AND MAXIMUM POPULAITON LOCATEED AT THE EAST,IN INDIA ALSO MAJORITY OF POPUALTION CONENTRATED IN GANGETIC PLAINS,AND WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT INDIA TALK ABOUT SUBCONTINET,BANGLADESH AND PAKISTAN TOO,BANGLADESH HAS HIGHEST DENSITY OF POPUALTION DUE TO GANGETIC PALINS,SO ITS NOT DUE TO FERTILITY RATES,INDIA ONLY 2.0 BANGLADESH ONLY 1.8,SO U SHOULD ADD THOSE DIRTY MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHO FK LIKE HELL ,LIKE PAKISTAN WHICIH HAS FERTILITY RATE OF 3.56 ,SO GO AND LECTURE THEM,AND POOR SUBSHARAN MUSLIM COUNTRIES WITH FERITLY RATES OF 4.0 TO 7.0 GO AND TELL THEM U FOOLS WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND
Once the new world was discovered Mexico and Brazil natives population diminished
No new world was discovered it was colonised by Portuguese people settled in Brazil they are not brazilian they are Portuguese and the black people are africans
@María Garcia 😢
@María Garcia white men
@@gansta__king__4013 spreading smallpox. So smallpox
@@gansta__king__4013 You know the natives gave white man diseases too? Syphilis never existed in old world until white man met new world natives.
Insane how Mexico was top three before the Spanish and smallpox arrived
Even first
because there was a time when a mountain on the island of Indonesia erupted and the lava reached Africa, initially the human population was in the millions, so that's all
But it's a year already 1000
yes it crippled the future, and made possible our "mestizo" culture, if all that population wouldnt have gone, mexico will be like an hispanic india
And Brazil too!!
It’s wierd to think that at one time Ecuador had a larger population than China
When?
Inca
LOL no.
Indiginous People.
The Americas had a lot of them before Colonialism.
@@spaghettiisyummy.3623 Today the continent Is full of them.
Fun fact : rise in population of india and china in 6000 BCE concides with cultivation of rice
Riceeeee
Rice cultivation started in Yangtze River in south China
Ah rice east asia's saving grace
As skmebody from the philippines, 75% of our food here is just rice 🤣
Yup! And then the big population boom after 1800s had a lot to do with potato cultivation too!
@@Ryan12458potato - world demographic trigger
The top 3: China, India, USA have been the same top 3 since about 1880.
China and india was always top 2
@@romaimparatoru4905 not exactly, mexico was no 1 for some time
China and india have been top 2 since 5000 bc
@@marcusvergara6193 mayans great-great-great grandparents aka olmecs grandparents aka the ones who got the chili and beans
1885
Finally someone who was able to count people in the year of 10000 BC. Great job!
10000 BC means we wanna tell the creater of a BC
And able to count them in every part in the world.
what is the source of these numbers ?
@@naturallifenow фантазия автора, я ещё могу поверить в статистику по странам в момент их существования, но как автор смог посчитать в нынешних границах эти числа? Например там есть Украина в 1920, но фактически как страна она появилась в 1991, и многие другие данные, как они посчитали людей в США до 1700 года? До этого никто из европейских стран не знал о их существование... точнее знали, но не посещали, не было статистики
Hajra271
THANK YOU! I found 2 other chats like this and BOTH of them were severely inaccurate in one particular point in history. Again, I Thank You for your accuracy and honesty.
Take Care All
Europeans: *Arrive in the Americas*
The population: My time has come
Population: thanks of you we could increase more our population = Better life quality
@@ivanovichdelfin8797 wait, what? The european violent invasion of the americas + the diseases that they bring killed almost the entiee population.
@@ivanovichdelfin8797 are you crazy bro???
@@Pedrinho8080 my guess is that they don't speak english very well... or they are high af
@@ivanovichdelfin8797 That is false. Mexico improved quality of life by themselves. Meanwhile Europeans brought wars and disease.
First Country to reach 1M people: Mexico 🇲🇽
First Country to reach 10M people: India 🇮🇳
First Country to reach 100M people: India 🇮🇳
First Country to reach 1B people is China 🇨🇳
Они все страшные дикари по сравнению с скандинавами и славянами!!!!!!!
Crazy how China & India have always had such large populations
Because India and China always had more fertile land and full of resource...
There empires dominated the world for thousands of years...
These two countries literally Ruled the world 🌎 for centuries
@@surajkumar5182 by territory no
@@aqepby economy also before 500 years ago china and india used to have 50 % economy of world
INDIA BIRTH RATE IS PERFECT AND ITS JUST 2.0 STOP UR WHITE RACISM,INDIA AND CHINA HAVE HIGHER POPUALTION BEOCZ,FROM THE STRARTING OF TIME,PEOPLE SETTLED HERE DUE TO BETTER AGRICULTURE AND ALL,INFACT INDIA AND CHINA HAD THE LEAST OVERALL GROWHT,TODAY THEY HAVE MOST POPUALTION BECOZ HISTORICALLY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THERE IN CHINA AND INDIA AND ,PEOPLE GREW MUCH GOOD AGRICULTURE AND WATER WAS PLENTY AND CLIMATE WAS TROPICAL,AND ALSO IN INDIA AND CHINA PEOPLE ARE CONCENTRATED AT CERTAIN AREAS,IN CHINA THE WESTERN SIDE AND TIBET ARE EMPTY BECOZ OF ARID LAND AND MAXIMUM POPULAITON LOCATEED AT THE EAST,IN INDIA ALSO MAJORITY OF POPUALTION CONENTRATED IN GANGETIC PLAINS,AND WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT INDIA TALK ABOUT SUBCONTINET,BANGLADESH AND PAKISTAN TOO,BANGLADESH HAS HIGHEST DENSITY OF POPUALTION DUE TO GANGETIC PALINS,SO ITS NOT DUE TO FERTILITY RATES,INDIA ONLY 2.0 BANGLADESH ONLY 1.8,SO U SHOULD ADD THOSE DIRTY MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHO FK LIKE HELL ,LIKE PAKISTAN WHICIH HAS FERTILITY RATE OF 3.56 ,SO GO AND LECTURE THEM,AND POOR SUBSHARAN MUSLIM COUNTRIES WITH FERITLY RATES OF 4.0 TO 7.0 GO AND TELL THEM U FOOLS WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND
i never knew mexico had the largest ancient population. very cool vid
WOW I never knew that fact about Mexico
I'm Mexican and I never new that either!😂🤣😅 ik that they were a lot of people before but not that much ,didn't know!
Aztecs Mayans we used to be on top but colonizers :/
@@godofcodgamer8296 Same
Seems more like speculation. There are tons of sources pointing to different numbers.
When u know in ancient time there were no pakistan Nepal n all so the total population goes to ancient India just imagine the population 💀
Yup
Why go ancient just 100 years back
Dalit, there was no India either.
@@stoopidpaki4806
I think you should read history first India existed before your zombie Muhammad came to earth
There are various historical references existed in different civilization about India like travelers from China and Europe has mentioned about India and
The biggest rulers of India the mauryan Empire and chanakya
Has already unified India before birth of your zombie religion
Yeaj that's what i was thinking entire ancient Indian subcontinent population = Bharatvarsha population
Great video
Subscribed. You are actually producing good comparative content. Thank you!
Portugueses: *arrives in America*
Amerindian population: F
-ucked?
The Spanish were first (among permanent european colonizers) and more numerous.
@@kaministquiamahackamack336
Okay, but what about when I said that the Portuguese were the first? I referred to the Portuguese being adept at exterminating the Amerindian peoples, with tens of millions being killed or enslaved, with the exception of the Southern Cone, you can see that in Spanish America the colonizers were much more merciful than the Portuguese
y probablemente seas latinoamericano lol
Whqt do you want to say?Now Brazil has more population than before.
@@ivanovichdelfin8797 Brazil has a large population, but the vast majority of indigenous peoples in Brazil were exterminated and only those who survived slavery survived. Many in Brazil have some share of Amerindian blood, but they are a minority (about 10% of Brazilians have indigenous ancestry) and today the indigenous population, even with a great deal of work being done for more than a century by the government, the indigenous population today is of only 0.4%, which is very different from the reality of its South American neighbors Well, the ethnicities of Brazil are very relative, but in short, the Amerindian population was almost exterminated and even though today Brazil has more or less 212 million in population, the indigenous population does not even have 1 million people
@@kryzthian_evang I understand your point of view. Listen, I am not portuguese, but I have something to say. I don't think it is a good idea to hold a grudge against those who have already gone. Portuguese people and Portugal it's not the same and if it is, what does make you think they masacre their villages and didn't want to discover new land but all indigenous who died were mainly because of diseases. Even all pf this death were cause of shots, swords, etc, perhaps the indigenous did not perform abusive rituals themselves who sacrified lot of them?
I don't think makes any sense to bear a grudge for the past. If all of them were like that, french people would complain of Germany because of nazis, Vietnam and Japan of United States because of the war, Australia and United States by the masacre of all indigenous were there.
It's important remember the past, but no throw it in the face. We have to look at future.
seeing mexico fall down so quickly around 1500 was horrifying
also Brazil
Brazil too, colonialism was relentless
I like these longer scale vids it’s so interesting to see
Just an idea would be nice to have a line graph with the total world population so we could see how it follows the trend globally... anyway, very curious!
3:27 that demographic armagedon for mexico from 25 million to between ~1 to 2 millon.
It wasnt all smallpoc though, there were several "cocolitzli" epidemics i dont know if i got it right but its something like that
Yeah, and in Australia and United States all people died
Not all.. in % numbers probably the amount of people that was exterminated is the same. The difference is that in Mexico they were millions and in the US and Australia were thousands.
I just fn love these kind of videos
Everyone please READ the description of this video: Present day day countries with their current borders are shown, for our convenience. This does of course not mean those countries and borders existed thousands of years ago...
I'm trying to imagine the way they used to monitor world population 10000 BC
🤔
These are approximate numbers based on archaeological sites.
@@gozhdaa The figures for Brazil in the pre-Christian era do not agree with most sources I know.
@@tuareg8311 Christianity literally destroyed Brazil's natives population, duh 🙄.
@@byunbaekhyun2283 Absolutely false, this narrative does not hold up in any way. Don't be fooled, I've seriously studied this subject for over 30 years and I challenge you to prove me wrong.
@@tuareg8311 It's a fact. Spaniards colonizers FORCE Native Brazilian to convert to Christianity, if they don't want to convert, they will be killed.
I'm stunned by the huge population in the "New World"
Such a nice music 🥰🥰
Katibim (Üsküdar'a Giderken) in Turkish music. Lots of different renditions in various Balkan countries though.
China: "I am the most populated country in the world."
India: "Ah shit here we go again."
China: Now let's lock them in the house and feed them as little as possible.
@@Shaolin91z actually unknowingly helping them to increase :D
INDIA BIRTH RATE IS PERFECT AND ITS JUST 2.0 STOP UR WHITE RACISM,INDIA AND CHINA HAVE HIGHER POPUALTION BEOCZ,FROM THE STRARTING OF TIME,PEOPLE SETTLED HERE DUE TO BETTER AGRICULTURE AND ALL,INFACT INDIA AND CHINA HAD THE LEAST OVERALL GROWHT,TODAY THEY HAVE MOST POPUALTION BECOZ HISTORICALLY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THERE IN CHINA AND INDIA AND ,PEOPLE GREW MUCH GOOD AGRICULTURE AND WATER WAS PLENTY AND CLIMATE WAS TROPICAL,AND ALSO IN INDIA AND CHINA PEOPLE ARE CONCENTRATED AT CERTAIN AREAS,IN CHINA THE WESTERN SIDE AND TIBET ARE EMPTY BECOZ OF ARID LAND AND MAXIMUM POPULAITON LOCATEED AT THE EAST,IN INDIA ALSO MAJORITY OF POPUALTION CONENTRATED IN GANGETIC PLAINS,AND WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT INDIA TALK ABOUT SUBCONTINET,BANGLADESH AND PAKISTAN TOO,BANGLADESH HAS HIGHEST DENSITY OF POPUALTION DUE TO GANGETIC PALINS,SO ITS NOT DUE TO FERTILITY RATES,INDIA ONLY 2.0 BANGLADESH ONLY 1.8,SO U SHOULD ADD THOSE DIRTY MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHO FK LIKE HELL ,LIKE PAKISTAN WHICIH HAS FERTILITY RATE OF 3.56 ,SO GO AND LECTURE THEM,AND POOR SUBSHARAN MUSLIM COUNTRIES WITH FERITLY RATES OF 4.0 TO 7.0 GO AND TELL THEM U FOOLS WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND
In 1500, the extermination of population in Mexico and Brazil is insane
Smallpox
I think a much more useful map would be to use more or less equal area regions or failing that, the provinces/states/oblasts within the large countries. That will much better show population distribution rather than making it look like Tibet, Alaska, the Amazon basin, and Siberia are heavily populated.
I Agree. You can find that on another video using another type of data though but a similar version to the one you said
New video launched
Name : World population by countries 1600 - 2023
I would recommend you to watch this,as its very good and shows you much more that you can understand.❤
does anyone know how to create these type of charts? or the software
The music at 3:14 is like when main characters die in the climax 😢
Edit: Not Mexico and Brazil being the Ned Stark and Robert Baratheon of the world 😂
1:06 the name of the song is "Üsküdar'a Giderken" ❤️🇹🇷
India: Steady and consistent growth
China: I'm spring
The music is orchestrial "uskudara gideriken" from Turkish music. Interesting
Tokyo has a greater population than any country did 3000 years ago
So Japan should be first.
Of course, but it's not difficult because the whole world had (far) less people than Japan today. They think between modern Australia and modern Thailand...
From 4600 bc to 1750 ad
India's undisputed dominance
For 6350 yrs india remained on the top
Thats unbelievably majestic 🔥🔥🔥
.
Edit - n now we have retook the throne 😎😎😎
We are already at top. Bangladesh, Pakistan, nepal, sri Lanka, bhutans population should be counted in India too making India 1.9 billion in population
@@pigapum1137 no theybsjouldeny be are u dumb
@@pigapum1137 that is undoubtedly accurate buddy
And crowded
@@cottonpie777 There is enough living space in every country for its citizens. Just some cities are crowded, main problem farmland and water and we have enough to feed our population.
I wonder how we can estimate with such a precision the prehistoric populations ?!!!!!
What sources did you use ?
How accurate is the early data really though though? And what’s the point in putting the country’s of today up when the ethnic groups that lived in many of these areas were completely unrelated genetically and culturally to the inhabitants of the country’s today for example in many cases especially in Central Asia 😅
What is the name of the song at minute 5:19?
The so-called new continent was actually the old continent.
The territory of Mexico was already called that before the Aztecs, and the coat of arms of the Mexican flag deals with a legend that also predates the Aztecs.
Mexico retains its same name and national coat of arms as before the arrival of the Spanish.
Sure buddy sure. Cope more
How is the "Old Continent" if its a fact that the human race originated in Africa?
@@dragonitzgametrue! Also asia and Europe were inhabited before the new world
Not even close. Humans are from Africa and Neandertaler from Europe and Asia. The modern human is a Mix between them.
Also the oldest civilizations are from China, India/Pakistan, Egypt and Mesopotamia
Only the knowledge was old (not in a good way).
Mexico 🐒🐒🐒
For a country that small in size and a continent I come from,I am genuinly suprised how Nigeria managed to to stay in the chat for almost all the time since A.D
Nigeria isn't that small. Maps just make the whole of Africa look smaller than it actually is.
It's really sad what happened to mexicos population
I did not know at the beginning mexico had the most population witch is surpriseing
The amount of times China’s population was completely wiped out and then rebuilt is amazing
is it possible to make the sources of this information availible in excel, or PowerBI? Or to mention the studies that the numbers came from?
At the end of the video, youtube starts to show ads for other videos and this covers the last info of your videos. Please, insert some kind of blank screen (about 10 seconds) at the end of your videos, so the ads will cover the blank screen and not the info.
Maybe fun fact : China population graph can be well described by microbial growth curve, it has log,stationary and death phase.
2.) Despite many lost from (civil)wars and disasters for many times it still top 3
it may have decreased in ancient times when it was fighting the Turks, or with the Mongol invasion.
Because China has had a census since the Warring States period three thousand years ago, while India lacked population statistics in ancient times. So ancient Chinese data are often based on historical data, while Indian population data can only be guessed. The estimated data is relatively stable, and it is difficult to estimate the change. However, the historical data of China's population statistics are easily affected by war. For example, when people fled to war, the population statistics would be very small, but when people settled down in peace, it would be easier to count.
Totally true!@@DANIEL-qz2km
@@DANIEL-qz2km you know this after saying rubbish . Which country was the most invaded by foreigners. Go and search . And China's population was decreasing at that time becoz of there are so many virus and deseases . The Ayurveda made India's population good. Indian's give treatment in ayurvedic medicines which is more good effective for any deseases. Chinese people called india the center of heaven (tianzhu) .
What is the second song
Start: Wow Australia is on the list
10 seconds: ohh....nvm
It's interesting to see that warfares have very little effect on the population of a country, less than plagues (though in history these two tend to come side by side), and far less than agricultural development and migrations.
No, look at the population of China, the populations decreases tremendously each time when the dynasties changes.
I think it's circunstancial. Meaning what the intent of the more powerful aggressor is compelled with how much they can get away with.
For example some conquerors would kill everyone in a city if the city resisted and later was captured. However if a city surrendered without a fight they were integrated into the empire. There are other cases where a new group of people want to take land at all cost and don't want anything to do with the natives, so they purposely kill them and little by little round them up into little parts in a country. Just a matter of time until the group dries up and dies. Which is what the colonist did with the natives in the USA.
That’s not the case. It’s just that the affects of war can take decades to be seen. A good example of this is modern day Russia, and many other Eastern European nations. which still have not recovered from the loss of tens of millions of men in WW2.
Poland before wwII had 35 million population.
The number is adjusted to present day boundaries. Poland was geographically bigger in 1939.
Poland was twice as big then as it is now
@@iconickid2397 its false and if it is true what it does?
@@iconickid2397 15-20% bigger. Not twice
This data was adjusted to current land region, not changing the land region through timeline.
I think you should've put the countries' population by their previous Empires' area.
For instance, Persian Empire (Iran) had 44 percent of the world's population in around 300 bc (50 million out of 112 million) .
Except Persian empire doesn't equate to iran. Iran is so small compared to the persian empire.
Also, not all 50 million in the persian empire was persian ethnically. It'd be very confusing and strange if they put the empires instead of today's countries
@@Zejva I mean it's originated in Iran (the region of Fars/Pars or Persia in Iran which is now a province). Also this video isn't about Ethnicity. It's about population. Again that'd be pretty cool if it would be like that.
@sakthi yes (at its peak)
@sakthi It's fine being an idiot. Don't feel bad about it.
how about we make everyone happy by just showing the map with population density, there, nobody can be mad
It’s weird that India has had the same amount of population 2400 BC as The Netherlands has now 2024 (about 17.5 million). Makes me also kind of question these numbers. I thought back in the day 4000 BC -2000 BC there were just about 200.000 max citizens in some countries.
From where do you get this perfect information 😅
it's based on archeological sites and historical records
What is the music that you use especially at the begging, what song is that?
It's from a game called Civilization. This is the Arabian Theme
The name of this song is "Kâtibim"(Turkish version).
This song is also available in other Balkan countries.
This is confusing. What borders are the populations based on throughout history? Like almost half of what is geographically the continental US belonged to Mexico until the mid 19th century. Does the population from before that time include the people living in that area, or not?
Normally this kind of video uses the modern borders to define what belongs to each country.
Clearly they used modern borders winch actually makes it extremely easy to understand winch parts of the world had how many people. Dividing the US into the hundreds of different tribes would be futile
I'm with you, there were not borders in this continent until the Spanish conquerors, but there were big tribes who controlled big areas, the most important. The Aztecs, The Mayas in theNorthern hemisphere, the Incas and the Chibchas in the southern hemisphere
@@ramonarellano4988 The Aztecs controlled a small portion of territory, similar than the size of present-day Guatemala and the Mayas a territory hardly bigger.
any source about starting point of this video ? mexico having 800k population in 10000BC? who counted?
I the Aztecs and Mayans were doing great but how did Brazil get such a large population and where do the Inca show up?
Bro in bc india, nepal, tibet, bangladesh, pakistan,sri lanka, bhutan, Myanmar, afganistan, malesia in one country that's name was birls of gold (sone ki chidiya) 👍🙂
Same doubt with me 🤔then how they did so ?
@@SachinSingh-ly3oe knowledge of WhatsApp University 😂
India as a country has lots of population to begin with, China was simply unfortunate because they have much more civil wars than in India
India as a country has lots of population to begin with, China was simply unfortunate because they have much more civil wars than in India
Yes
3:19
The sadest moment of human history...
F Brazil, F México
what happened China and India hit 100,000,000 people?
@@Godzillaminusone70Mexico and Brazil dropped to a few thousand
@@lesscringeymapperdude oh that's def not the saddest in human history there's been far worse. still sad
@@Godzillaminusone70 like?
I think that in the time of the first civilization in europe, the Vinča civilization (Serbia) had more than 90.000 residents 7500 years ago...
Nice
India had Australia’s population in the year -1600
No it was 5 times bigger than today's australia in 1600
8:38 Mexico and Brazil are bouncing right back!
How is there data from Australia’s population from pre English colonisation
Rock drawings and shit
AD1: the power of the Roman Empire
It is thought that the colonisation of Americas would have been the same as in Asia and Africa (where the europeans simply became the ruling class but did not settle). Unfortunately for native americans they had no immunity to arrived diseases (not just smallpox) and were dying in horrific numbers. This gave the europeans an easy opportunity to completely suppress the natives and settle in the new world
woow
Bro mexico is like HELP ME IM FALLING!!
Where you get data any source
Bro was living and calculating the population from 10000bc
Very Cool
How do you use the HYDE database?
Philippines populations starts to grow by 80' and it became one of most populated by year 2022. In just a short period of time
No one can beat us in population😂
I cannot believe that it does not contain the Levant, because the Levant has the largest ancient cities such as Jericho, Aleppo, Damascus, Mari (Tal al-Harir), Sidon, Byblos, and Jerusalem.
It's a desert, not many resources to sustain big populations like other vast fertil lands as China and India.
Well, this game with modern days flags to represent populations of a region is quite confusing. The Turkish flag appears on the chart from the bronze era but Turks appear in history many thousands years later.
I have the impression you confused Brazil with Peru in your pre colombian estimates...
"People dont grow on trees"- Sun Tzu
China and india rivalry be like
Do you think that during that time someone recorded the population of this country. And there some countries which devised recently😂
Hvem beviser? Den som korrekturskriver skal ikke gjøre det, dere fantastiske mennesker! Gjør feil, gjør rett!
El 1776 china tenía la misma población de EEUU actual
*mais exato em 1805*
Great to know that in 7400 BC there were 855,171 people living in Brazil …a country that wouldn’t exist for another nine Millenia or so.
The land exists no matter the name
Music between 1:04-3:18 is an old Turkish melody
I'm not sure if I should trust this one. I mean, numbers didn't change drasticly at historical events, which it should
I know, there was no reduction in Russia's population during WWII on this and yet millions were supposed to have died.
Just imagine 1947 separation never happened 😂😂😂
Bhai Pakistan toh 1947 m bna h yha toh bhtt phela se kaisa dekhara
Read the end of the title and the first paragraph of the description.
You didn't reset it to 8 people for after the flood.
Lol
Underrated comment
How united kingdom population become smaller? What countries do they hold before?
It would be great if this map showed the shape of the eart in ancient times
Why were Mexico and Brazil so populated in the beginning?
Yes... When Spanish colonial era in 15th century... They bought chicken fox disease that killed million natives
Look at 3:19 mexico and Brazil out in top 20 because of dieses that bought by Spanish in 1500s
Before Europe came to America continent.. there where been civilizations like Aztecs Mayans incas etc....
*OLMECS*
Brazil most likely because of the many rivers it has and its fertile land. I imagine it's somewhat similar to India in that aspect.
Someone mentioned that India and China had a population boom after the domestication of Rice in China. Brazil didn't domesticate anything like that. I don't know if they got corn and if they did I don't know if that grows as well in their environment as something like Rice did in Asia.
As for Mexico, I think it had to do with the fact they were experts at domesticating plants. Mexico doesn't have the rivers other countries have, and rivers are essential for the growth of plants and population. However they did domesticate corn, Chile, vanilla, tomatoes, gum, rubber, pumpkin, cotton, tobacco, cactus, magay(whatever the plant is called for making Tequila), maybe chocolate from Mexico alone. One a staple (corn) and the others also extremely important and relevant to humans.
What they lacked in resources they made up with ingenuity and adaptation.
One such example is the city of Tenochtitlan. The Mexica city. It was built on an island on a lake of salt water. Terrible conditions for growth. It would have been a death sentence for many other people, however the Mexica built damns to filtrate the salt water from the fresh water. That way they could us the water for farming and drinking water, also fishing. They built aquaducts that went from mountains to the city so people could have easy access to fresh clean water. When they ran out of space to farm they built Chinampas (floating gardens) in the lake. Boom, the perfect way to farm invented. Perfect example of creativity and adaptation.
Much reverence is given to say the Germans for achievements during ww1-ww2 eras in terms of being efficient and smart but the people of Mexico had done it from before 10,000 BC to 1519 AD. Having first place to retaining 3rd for thousands of years, not bad.
Very sad what portugal did to brazil at 1500
in recent discovers Brazil had actually way more people during the 1500s, but a huge pandemic hit the interior population especially in the amazon region making then gradually desapear until 1600s, because the monuments and cities were made using natural decomposing materials the massive rainforest around took over the habitations making them almost invesible, the only way to see what left today is using lidar tecnology, also the "El Dourado" mith probably was created during some spanish exploration travel in the Amazon river what explain why the city was never found and why the mith was even created
The music is raputin but slowed
Antes de la llegada de los españoles el "Perú" tenía 11 millones aprox.
Eso era el imperio inca el cual ocupaba más territorio
olá senhor já oviste falar de seqçu ocasional?
What are the song names ?
China has had nationwide censuses since the Warring States period three thousand years ago, while India lacked population statistics in ancient times. So ancient Chinese data are often based on historical data, while Indian population data can only be estimated. But in fact, there has been a serious under-reporting of population in ancient China, so the actual population in ancient China is much larger than that in historical records
The under reporting in ancient China was due to an abacus failure. Once it got back online they were able to correct the count.
India Always has more population than china,
India had so many kingdoms, where population could be calculated
India have twice better fertile land
a huge mistake 1917- and 1922+ indicate Ukraine and Russia as separate states. From December 1922 it is the USSR, and until 1917 it is the Russian Empire
It's based on the population in current borders for every country.