Ranking Every LEGO Star Wars UCS Set Ever Made From Worst to Best! (2000 - 2023)
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- Romans 10:9
Thanks for watching!
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
My Instagram➡️ / fivelonelyclones
Discord Server➡️ / discord
My second channel➡️ / @flcsnippets668
More videos➡️ • All Top 10s and Rankin...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Background Music
➡️ • Five Lonely Clone's Ba...
0:00 Intro
0:28 36
1:33 35
2:31 34
3:21 33
3:55 32
4:28 31
5:19 30
6:10 29
7:01 28
7:29 27
8:12 26
8:52 25
9:26 24
10:07 23
10:35 22
11:06 21
11:45 20
12:27 19
13:06 18
13:38 17
14:13 16
14:41 15
15:09 14
16:37 13
17:15 12
17:50 11
18:28 10
19:13 9
19:48 8
20:35 7
21:03 6
21:45 5
22:25 4
22:58 3
23:32 2
24:16 1
#legostarwars #starwars #legostarwarsucs - Krátké a kreslené filmy
Forgot to mention that I purposely left out the 2 Death Star play sets.
And you forgot about mos eisley cantina
It is one of the best
@@karolad7880that’s a master builders series set not ucs
@@fivelonelyclones my bad
I thought it was
@@karolad7880just so you know big sets that are based of a building/battle are master builder sets not ucs
@@fivelonelyclones Do you know why Assualt on Hoth and the Ewok village are considered UCS and not MBS? they seem like a very similar concept and until I looked it up I thought they were both MBS
THANK YOU! Actually someone Who realises UCS sets are about builds not minifigures and put Gunship To good place and not on bottom because of the figs
Well it's not just about the minfigs, it's the comments that were made about it by the designers. Like "all anyone remembers is a yellow clone." Anyway, it is a great build though.
I only buy LEGO because of the minfigs, I don’t have space for all the builds and the minifigs are easier to display for me 😅
@@Samfan4Films777a set should not be determined by outside factors imo, yeah the designers said some bloody stupid stuff but it doesn’t affect the model itself
@@jediswitajewski8271 it doesn't, but it affects the fan relationship.
@@Samfan4Films777who tf cares about words. The build itself is amazing you clown
Imagine hating the Landspeeder but liking the godawful Yoda lmao
For its time, not terrible
That Yoda is beautiful leave him alone
Haha, legit the guys trying to downplay the landspeeder
Yeah really. Those buildable character sets are atrocious.
I love the Landspeeder, it looks awesome IMO and it has amazing details. Always thought it looked so sleek on screen and sounds so cool. But to each their own
Plus it's iconic
@@darthbane2669is it? It’s in like 10 minutes of one movie
@@mr.stuffdoer8483That doesn't make it less iconic.
The landspeeder is gross, and it getting a ucs version goes to show how biased lego is towards the original trilogy.
The landspeeder is a lego travesty.
@@mr.stuffdoer8483 it's in 10 minutes of one of the most iconic movies of all time lmao
I hate it how every Lego enthusiast hates studs showing. They’re building a Lego set not a model
Lego youtubers are the worst kind, sucking out the fun of Lego in general.
The entire point of UCS sets are to be a model.
@@Infernos94 a lego model, yes.
@@scientistmyselfi would wager that most people buy UCS sets not because theyre lego but because they are good display pieces. Studs objectively dont look as good on display as tiles and thats the point of these sets. Theres a reason they have started selling so much better since they started tiling and its not all lego youtubers.
@@Infernos94 dude there’s many star wars ship models that aren’t lego. If you buy a Lego model you are buying a Lego model. It really isn’t deeper than that. You don’t want legos in your model? Don’t buy a lego model.
I agree with almost everything on this list. Would only put the UCS falcon (2017) at least in the top 5 though.
Hot take: We need more building/battle type of sets. Like the battle of scarif/takodana/saleucami, all pretty good sets and lego doesnt really make many sets like this
yes
The 75252 Star Destroyer is amazing to look at. But what's definitly annoying about the set is the fact that you can see coloured bricks through the body everywhere. If you tweak it like i did and replace the coloured bricks with light bluge grey bricks, it's definitely the best looking Set out there🎉
The B-Wing is my favorite Star Wars ship. And like you said, it definitely does not get a lot of love. I'm just glad they made a UCS set before all these new shows started to happen and introduced newer, "better" ships... 👍
While its not my favourite (but definitely top 5), I really like the B-wing and got me into collecting the other UCS sets
To me the ucs falcon is number 1 its detail is unmatched as a ucs set. The sheer amount of greebling and detail make it rank highest for me. I would rank imperial shuttle number 2 being super accurate and sleek. The razorcrest i would also have in the top 5. The venator looks great and i do love the isd. The isd got way too much hate for its figures and price. But the isd is massive, its the largest ucs starwars set ever by volume. Its a good value for its size. The AT-AT is the greatest ucs set as far as interior accuracy. But the exterior is off and its legs are too bulky. But it would be hard to make it otherwise. I would rank the last snow speeder higher, its a very great looking ucs set also. The y wing is also amazing. Lukes landspeeder to me is sleek and looks great but its true.its not the most exciting ucs set. The slave 1 looks great too. Honestly its hard to rank them. But i would rank the ucs falcon number 1 and ucs shuttle number 2. Then probably the slave 1 number 3. The isd number 4 and the AT-AT number 5 the venator number 6 the razor crest number 7 the y wing number 8 the snow speeder number 9 ucs A wing number 10. Although i like the death star 2, i think it looks too outdated and studded to be in the top 10. New ucs xwing would be in my top 15 along with ucs lukes landspeeder and ucs ssd and the ucs darth vaders tie fighter. I own the 2017 falcon, the AT-AT,the red five 2013 xwing, the slave 1,lukes landspeeder, 2019 ucs isd and the SSD, razorcrest so i only own 8 ucs sets so far. I would love to get the tie fighter,snow speeder and y wing. Wish they would do a vaders tie fighter remake and imperial shuttle remake.
My top 5 ranking would be:
1. UCS Death Star 2
2. UCS Imperial Shuttle
3. UCS Millennium Falcon(2017)
4. UCS Venator
5. UCS Slave 1
I was never big on the Darth Maul bust until I built and displayed it. The think has presence. I now love having it on display. It overshadows all but the large sets.
Just subscribed to your channel. ❤
I recently discovered your vids, and I’m impressed by the quality, your voice, and general presentation. You have a new fan. I don’t necessary agree with all of your rankings, but that’s fine. It’s nice to see an updated UCS ranking video.
Agreed Just Subbed
UCS gunship and venator are my top 2 favorite sets of all time for sure!!! Great video
Out of all my sets on display, the one that strikes the eye is the ISD, the massive silhouette just punches me in the face every time I come home, the rest of my sets go unnoticed in comparison
You should rank all Star Wars D2C sets they have ever made UCS + MBS + 2021 R2D2 + 2023 chewie + the death stars,
10123 cloud city,
10131 tie fighter collection,
10144 sandcrawler,
10178 motorised walking AT-AT,
10195 republic dropship with AT-OT,
10198 Tantive IV,
75244 Tantive IV
ATAT is easily number one, i mean come on, execution, accuracy, details, minifiscale, full interior, posability, it is just perfect ! Falcon is obviously number two ! Imperial Star destroyer is number three, and Venator is number four. Fifth spot would go to the Imperial Shuttle, the new Xwing in 6th spot. Slave one would go in 7th place and B wing right after it. Landspeeder would be 9th and Obi-Wan starfighter would take the 10 th place.
I HATE the oversized minifigure scale UCS sets because theyre perfectly fine for about $80 and are completely good for scale. Some recent Examples are the 2022 Landspeeder and 2023 X Wing. They take up great spots that could be used for other actually good builds. Y-Wing gets a pass though because theyre cool.
They can only make SOME UCS sets minifigure scale. For example, the UCS x-wing. If that would be minifigure scale it would be the same size of a play scale set. Some sets they have to increase the size above minifigure scale for it to be UCS worthy. But I agree, they need to make some UCS sets minifigure scale like the UCS gunship
@@ThugMeisterthe UCS Gunship is a great example of a minifigure-scale UCS set
i'd switch the venator with the imperial star destroyer, but yeah
Love the list and also the Romans 10:9, keep up the good work brother
I was kinda checked out after putting landspeeder that low and the top 10 order is brave/interesting. Quality vid though and can’t really argue opinions haha.
Pretty good list but the Venator is better than the ISD, just more detailed and especially with the colors nicer to display. Plus the exclusive Rex and Yularen beat 2 unnamed officer by a long mile
Disagree. The ISD is iconic, most people couldn't even tell you what the Venator is from. Your point about the mini figs is true for many, but I don't really care about figs.
star destroyer all day
@@broncojuan It might be more iconic but the Venator is still more detailed and a better display model
@@JuliaJuanaAlvarez Meh, That red stripe does nothing for me. It's fine. Solid build, I have it as my 12th favorite that I own.
@@broncojuan It's not just the red stripe, or the color, in general it is more detailed with better textures. The ISD is mostly just covered in bland studs
The original ucs millennium falcon doesn't have a interior only the newer 2017 one does
In my person hot take opinion, the Lambda shuttle is overrated, yes it’s a beautiful minifig scale set, but compared to the other minifig UCS sets, like The Slave 1 and the Falcon, it’s just a giant white blob. But overall great Video and rankings
never understood the massive hype on that flying windmill either. it looks so "empty" next to other highly detailed ucs
For 2002 the Naboo Starfighter looks insanely good. It was only around 2004 that the Star Wars playscale sets became good looking
I get the sentiment with Luke’s landspeeder, I remember rolling my eyes when it was announced… but after actually seeing the build I was surprised how much I wanted it and how cool it looks. I know it’s an unusual scale for SW but it’s on par with large car builds like Ferrari etc
that said, great list!
Great video!!
damn new lonely clone vid nice
Mfw I've been crushing on venator class destroyers my entire life and lego just released one for 600 bucks, but I'm still a student at university who doesn't earn more than 500 per month, with the set most likely retiring when I finally get a well paying job
Would but the landspeeder a lot higher. It was a geat build and looks very accurate. I think i would switch it with the 2023 xwing., which looks ok, but is very weak and is not as fun to build as the 2013 xwing even though it looks better.
The landspeeder is a good UCS set and I will die on this hill. It wouldn’t be so hated if the play set wasn’t remade so many times. It’s an iconic vehicle and a very well done UCS I don’t regret buying it one bit
I have mostly every one of these except the busts. Some I have two yet most of them are in the box. Don’t have enough time to get to them but didn’t know imperial shuttle went for that much. I am planning to open super star destroyer as my next build
You're just not being objective *at all* as far as the landspeeder is concerned. It's objectively a more accurate build than a lot of the sets you ranked higher than it, uses some great building techniques, includes the best C-3PO minifigure to date, and isn't super expensive either. It's a way better set than a lot of the sets you ranked higher than it.
Womp womp
@@fivelonelyclonesLmao
Agreed.
Wow a subjective list isnt objective, who coulda thunk
why is big grey triangle better than Venator?
At this point we are going to get a lukes landspeeder every year. Next year there will be lukes starship landspeeder ultimate collectors edition
Your chanel is great😂
Did you know that tere is a secret UCS Skyhopper
(it's set 6211 B2)
The landspeeder is dope imo and it’s nice not building endless grey or white builds
I am torn on UCS sets, If they are the behemoth ships then I think they are awesome but if they are minifigure scale than I just think of them as expensive playsets. Like the Venerator and Star Destroyers heck yeah but the razor crest and x wing, I'd just get the playsets.
All of the UCS Starfighters are oversized including the x wings
@@fivelonelyclones yessir, I just think they look silly next to a star destroyer because the scale is all wrong, just my opinion. (Romans 1:16 my friend)
The razorcrest is minifig scale but all the fighters are oversized. The playscale versions are actually closer to minifig scale.
The falcon,AT-AT, razorcrest,the slave 1 and the old falcon and imperial shuttle are the only minifig scale ucs sets. I don't really count the deathstar playset or the hoth playset as true ucs sets. Both should be master builder series like the cantina and the cloud city set. Although cantina to me could qualify more for ucs than the other two, being more accurate and close to scale.
Excellent Top Ten.
Personally like the Venator better than the ISD both just the ship and Lego version and I can't in my mind understand why the Lambda is that high.
the lambda holds up to its name, its lambda, a whatever looking ship to me. It surely is iconic but i dont know why would anyone display a flying angry windmill instead of many better looking ucs sets
glad the A and B-wing got fair rankings me personally i would put them a bit higher but respect
Nice summary. Well set out. However you mention the amount of ' all grey' ships, and then put the star destroyer top! I get you, but...!
My problem with the most mordern snow speeders is that they're white instead of grey, I think it would've been better being grey. Also I don't understand why people don't like studs showing? To me that is just the lego aesthetic and I think it looks cool with the studs. It is lego, it is going to look like lego no matter what imho so the studs don't really affect the look of it to me
I honestly don't get the hate the Assult on Hoth set gets. I mean yeah it's a UCS set but the Master Builder Series wasn't out yet. In the end it is just a name. The set itself is one of the best playsets lego has ever made. From playability to minifigs it was just incredible. I got the set when I still played with Lego and I never cared thag it was brandes as a UCS
He said it in the video. It's great as a playset, but as a UCS set, it's very much lacking.
This wookie has more lines than any other wookie in star wars combined
nice video
I agree with this list except for the placement of the Slave I. I see why you put it up so high but I think the lack of an interior hurts it. I just think that the Razor Crest and AT-AT walked are way too perfect to be below the Slave I that doesn't have an interior.
and you still agree with putting the sticker-infested no interior venator at the second place ?
This is were the fun begins
Where is the f is ma cantina man???
Master builder series not ucs
the new venetor has to be me second favourite or tied with my first (slave 1) i think the ucs slave 1 is my favourite purely because old boba and the slave one are some of my favourite characters/ships in star was but that new rex plus a awesome venetor is definitely second or even tied with the slave 1 for me
Thank you so much.
I disagree with a lot of these, and agree with a lot of 'em too. Either way, it was entertaining to watch!
For me the UCS venator is number 1 bc it’s my absolute favorite ship
Definitely a strange ranking--I guess I don't understand your ranking criteria. But good video nonetheless.
I just bought that AT-AT model and it cost just 579€, i think it was really good deal
I genuinely cannot comprehend why anyone would pay 3000 dollars for the old millennium falcon when the new version is better in every way and a 1/3 of the price. Absolute morons throwing their money away
You forget that humanity really loves rarity. Throughout all of human history, we have always valued things that are rare, regardless of their objective usefulness. No, it doesn't make sense to me either, but the majority of people can at least appreciate rare stuff, and when some people get to a point where they can sort of afford anything, they start yearning for the things that are hard to obtain regardless of how much money they have.
The sandspeeder looks like a jet powered slipper
lots of sets i would have put WAY higher but nonetheless the ucs isd is at the top so that gets a like from me 😼
i’m so glad someone else hates luke’s speeder
Frothing at the mouth that the AT-AT, latest UCS Falcon and Razor Crest got beat out by the SSD 😭 what crime was that lmao
The only one I have is the 2000 x wing that I found in my basement storage room lol
Slave 1 looks so clean
How would the falcons not look good on display?😳 And honestly how would it be easier to display the death star II than one of the falcons? Just does not make any sense…
I have the ewok village set, mint in box😮
Wasn’t the super star destroyer discontinued
What about the UCS AT-AT?
I never spend my money so when I check my wallet for the Venator I get happy.It’s my only ucs set but pbly bouta get the xwing
I dont understand why the original r2 d2 set is concidered ucs but the new version that has more pieces and better detailed isnt lol to me the buildable figures are ucs sets too. They come with a plaque, they are super detailed large models. Like they have yoda as a ucs set too but not the newer yoda set as one. To me grogu and yoda and the new r2 d2 are ucs sets. Along with bb8 and the other droids.
The original R2-D2, along with all sets before 2017, predate both MBS and Sculpture categories. In 2017, Lego split the UCS line into 3 categories: UCS, MBS, and Sculpture. This allowed them to focus the product lines for Display Vehicles/Buildings (UCS), High Minifig count Display "playsets" (MBS), and Character models (Sculpture). For all intents and purposes, the original R2-D2 is a Sculpture.
I’d swap a few around for sure, mainly the ISD at #1. It’s top 5, maybe top 3, but it’s fragility has kept me from buying it, and would keep me from ranking it 1st. That and I think Luke’s Speeder would be top 15. But enjoyed the video, and sub’d!
Yes, the ISD is fragile, but it's as fragile as any other set on this list, and because it's a display set and not meant to be played with, it was never really a major problem
you can't display 75098??? LOL WHAT I have it on a shelf with 2 x AT-AT walkers and an extra snow speeders and it looks EPIC!!!
Personal biased top 5:
5. Slave 1
4. Republic Gunship
3. Millennium Falcon (2017)
2. Razor Crest
1. AT-AT
why would the crest be this high ?
@@nagomo8794 minifig scale & interior which are big things for me
@@witchii understandable. I wouldnt put any non prequel/OT set next to the other ones you put on your top 5, yet i agree with you on the stunning interior build
ISD looks better than the Venator because it has no damn ugly stickers.
I appreciate that you do not like the Landspeeder, however, you did not take your bias out of the equation. Objectively, the Landspeeder is an excellent build, and probably ranks near the top in terms of accurate recreation. I think your real bias is simply that you do not like the vehicle, which, is, a bias. No other criticism exists that isn't true for other builds. Yes, it is technically the smallest vehicle in the UCS lineup, but not by much (ObiWan's Jedi Starfighter was not exactly a large ship), and many of the other ships are oversized. I do agree it is one of the more simple ones, but I certainly do not see how it is ranked below the busts.
Nah I admire the landspeeder and think it’s a great and iconic vehicle. It just doesn’t work as a ucs set
@@fivelonelyclones Fair, I was unfairly assuming. Not sure I really understand why you think it doesn't work for UCS, as the A-wing is about the same, oversized scale. Is it just overly simplistic? Too far outside the standard flying ship theme? Genuinely curious.
On a side note, I think the 2nd Millennium Falcon could have been higher, despite being a literal coffee table, and therefore hard to display, but you are spot on about the top 2... a coin toss on which destroyer is better.
Millennium Falcon is number 1!!! What are you thinking?!
Where was the Betrayal at Cloud City ranked again?
Not a ucs set
hi, how about death star?
the lego death star is a good set, but it definitely deserved to be left out of the video. people praise that set so much, but it has the same problem that the ucs hoth set has, it's a playset labeled as a ucs set.
oh hey your box came all splotchy too.
🔥
I'm sure UCS Lukes Landspeeder was made only for meme purpose
Wacky list but respectable 👍
WHen oh when will we get a USC Mon Cal cruiser? All those imperial capital ships and the biggest rebel ship we have is the Corvette. Sigh.
way too niche
W imperial star destroyer is the 1st thing you see when you watch star wars 4
I don't know why ucs sets even have minifigs they have no purpose
I only buy the ucs ships myself currently building the venator I love that it's easier to display than the star destroyer
Worst ucs for me ship wise is the gunship I don't like it I regret getting it it's harder to display than the falcon
agree w #1 spot
Putting the Naboo starfighter 2nd to last is absolutely absurd
its a great and probably the best naboo starfighter PLAY set. It never deserved the mention UCS to me, it only gained it cuz it had exclusive chrome parts.
you like big gray ships i see
I have an 10179 and I'm not happy about this lol
Too bad the UCS Venator is not live-action based. I can't believe they went with the animated model.
What's the problem? They're practically identical.
@@puderkman I suggest you look at pictures. They are NOT closely identical.
@@danielq_4 I compared images before commenting, and there is no significant difference.
@@puderkman there are. Might seem minute to you, but there are
@@danielq_4 Tell me any differences that are significant enough to me a big deal out of.
Also you forgot to mention both deathstar ucs playsets
Left them out on purpose
@@fivelonelyclonesfair enough
@fivelonelyclones why you added in the both play set why take those out.
Forgot the ucs Jawa sand crawler also. Which is not high on my list but it's a ucs set. Also I think you left out one of the two snow speeders.
Big Fan well done I’ve been subscribed for a while love your vids
If you look at one of the rebels on assault on hoth it’s the captain Rex looking guy also from endor.
Imo the landspeeder is better than the original ucs xwing
Where is the Ucs BB8?
In my opinion the venator is way overhyped, I mean it have literally zero interieur
I can't understand why anyone would pay these ridiculous $1000+ prices for the really old sets. What a waste of money. The majority of the sets made from 1999-2006 look pretty bad. Nostalgia will cause you to waste your money. Only one that would be worth it is death star 2 which is the only early 2000s ucs that holds up. It would probably be much cheaper to part it out
14:08 its not a ucs set. Ofc it doesnt look that good on display but thats because its a master builder series sets
It’s a ucs set, mbs sets weren’t a thing when that set released and it’s labeled as a ucs set on brickset.com and that’s what I always go by
@@fivelonelyclones You can make the same argument about the two death star playsets. Hoth, Ewok, and the death stars would all be released as MBS today. Which ones make the cut in your video is obviously up to you, great video!
Thats a brave list my friend. But alas I must admit that I was afraid in the begining you will be another Mandr copycat. I am glad I was wrong and even when I have different opinion I enjoyed your list. Well made. Only if you make longer explanation from the top10 would be appreciated next time.
Yeah I was in a time crunch when doing the top 10
Falcon is first imo, then imperial star destroyer.
^^
Where was the mos eisely (sp)
Mbs set