Top 5 Cheapest Bush Airplanes 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 07. 2024
  • If you’re searching for bush planes, this video will touch upon some of the most affordable and reliable models available on the market. We’ll look at their current price and technical specifications, as well as their interiors or cabin setup. Watch the whole episode so you can see our top pick!
    Bush airplanes were initially designed for Canada's remote north and the harsh environments of Alaska. These are essentially piston-engine aircraft outfitted with skis, tundra tires, or floats. They feature high-mounted wings that offer more clearance and help reduce damage while loading and larger flaps that help performance on short-field takeoffs and landings. Nowadays, bush planes are used all over the world, from New Zealand's rugged mountains, and Kenya's dry deserts, to the lush Amazon jungles. They're the perfect aircraft for daring, non-traditional pilots.
    🛩️ If you enjoyed this episode, give us a LIKE, write a COMMENT, and SHARE the video!
    🛩️ SUBSCRIBE and click the notification bell to get up-to-date with new uploads!
    FOLLOW US:
    / aviationfederation
    DONATE HERE:
    www.buymeacoffee.com/AviationTV
    OUR PLAYLIST:
    • Top 5 Cheapest Private...
    MORE VIDEOS:
    Top 3 Most Popular 6-Seater Single-Engine Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    • Top 3 Most Popular 6-S...
    Top 5 Cheapest Personal Aircraft Under $25K 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    • Top 5 Cheapest Persona...
    Top 5 Cheapest Classic Single-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison
    • Top 5 Cheapest Classic...
    EXTRA INFO:
    Zenith STOL CH 701
    © Zenith Aircraft Company
    Max Cruise Speed: 85.16 knots
    Gross Weight: 1100 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 20 gal
    Passenger Capacity: 4
    Price: Starts at US$ 29,485.00
    Murphy Radical
    © Murphy Aircraft Manufacturing
    Max Cruise Speed: 112 kn
    Gross Weight: 1900 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 44 gal
    Passenger Capacity: 2
    Price: Starts at US$ 35,900.00
    Just Aircraft Superstol
    © Just Aircraft / Keith Showalter
    Max Cruise Speed:86.90 (100 mph)
    Fuel Capacity: 27 gal
    Gross Weight: 1550 lbs
    Passenger Capacity: 2
    Price: Starts at US$ 41,700.00
    Kitfox Series 7 Speedster
    © Kitfox Aircraft
    Max Cruise Speed:112.97 knots
    Fuel Capacity: 27 gal
    Gross Weight: 1550 lbs
    Passenger Capacity: 2
    Price: Starts at US$ 41,995.00
    Barrows 4-Place Bearhawk
    © Bearhawk Aircraft
    Max Cruise Speed:130.35 knots
    Fuel Capacity: 50 gal
    Gross Weight: 2500 lbs
    Passenger Capacity: 4
    Price: Starts at US$ 61,000
    OTHER VIDEOS:
    Top 5 Bush planes In The World
    • Top 5 Bush planes In T...
    The Strongest Bush Plane in the World
    • Video
    TOP 5 BUSH PLANES - LSA Edition
    • TOP 5 BUSH PLANES - LS...
    DISCLAIMER:
    The views expressed in our videos are our opinions and may not necessarily reflect those of the companies we feature.
    Our content abides by the terms of Fair Use for education and commentary and the clips we feature in our editorials are owned by their respective copyright holders. The clips presented are for informational and non-commercial purposes only. For any business, media, or partnership inquiries, comment below or email: legal@emotionmedia.net
    #BushAirplane #BushAircraft #PersonalAircraft #AviationFederation
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 133

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation  Před rokem +10

    *Is it pronounced as “stol” or “s-tol”? We’ve heard both, so please sound off here in the comments section! To see more interesting aircraft videos, check these out:*
    Top 3 Most Popular 6-Seater Single-Engine Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    czcams.com/video/3jtu9iaHytc/video.html
    Top 5 Cheapest Personal Aircraft Under $25K 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    czcams.com/video/_yB9KMzvMBk/video.html
    Top 5 Cheapest Classic Single-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison
    czcams.com/video/M3aWHExpZjw/video.html

    • @RedBullOficialSupport
      @RedBullOficialSupport Před rokem +1

      It is pronounced "stol" as said by multiple manufacturers

    • @backcountryaviators
      @backcountryaviators Před rokem

      Great video. One correction in the description of the video, the Zenith STOL CH-701 can only hold 2 passengers. The big brother, the CH-801 (which we own) can hold 4, but is more expensive.

    • @garrycompton7214
      @garrycompton7214 Před 5 měsíci

      Short takeoff or landing .

  • @robgoffroad
    @robgoffroad Před rokem +68

    Keep in mind that you can expect to spend an additional $80-100k on top of the kit price to finish it; the kit prices doesn't include avionics ($30k or so), engine ($40k) and paint.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem +3

      Thank you for the additional information regarding the cost of finishing a kit-built aircraft. It's important to keep in mind that the initial kit price is just one part of the total cost of building an aircraft, and there are many additional expenses that can add up quickly. Builders will also need to factor in the cost of tools, materials, and any specialized equipment or services that may be required.

    • @TheGrobe
      @TheGrobe Před rokem +3

      thank you! knowing what an old used Cub or an ultralight costs, I knew there was something wrong with obtaining an actual airplane for that price, even if I had to put it together! it’s easy to get excited though, so better to be let down now. 🥲

    • @datgio4951
      @datgio4951 Před 8 měsíci +3

      That’s fkn depressing

  • @neilkaippallil8390
    @neilkaippallil8390 Před rokem +12

    Maximum Flight travel range should be shown in Discription box...if not displayed

  • @MSPhysicsForFun
    @MSPhysicsForFun Před rokem +7

    Zenith stol ch701 is my choice, the tundra tyre would be fun.

  • @S2StrategicDefense
    @S2StrategicDefense Před rokem +13

    The Zenith 701 cannot take 4 passengers. The 750 cannot even take 4.

    • @pilotblue6535
      @pilotblue6535 Před rokem

      Go with the 801 then.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      From Wikipedia, "Phone Booth Stuffing":
      "On March 20, 1959, students at the Durban, South Africa YMCA set a world record when 25 of them were able to squeeze at least the greater portions of their bodies into a standard upright phonebooth."
      Just sayin'...

  • @MelvinCruz
    @MelvinCruz Před rokem

    Nice video,I was looking for some good basics of the best planes in this category, this one gave me what I was looking for

  • @johnhorgan9295
    @johnhorgan9295 Před rokem +2

    Love them all👍

  • @pilotblue6535
    @pilotblue6535 Před rokem +7

    All excellent planes in their own right. All have strengths and weaknesses. Aluminum vs fabric vs Carbon fiber. Carburetor vs Fuel Injection. Steam gauges vs Glass cockpit. Stored in a Hangar vs Outside. Float/ ski capable? The kit prices (Amateur Home Built) never includes the Firewall forward (engine, exhaust, coolers, sensors, cowl), Propeller ($2-12,000), Panel, paint and / or finishing. As an aircraft builder, count on 2-5X the kit price to complete. Experienced builder with a work space count on 18 months to build. Inexperienced builder working in a home garage 3-10 years. Advantage to Home built is owner maintenance (huge cost saving - annual and routine service). Down side - documentation of the builder using Approved Aeronautical Building Standards or are they using the local hardware / auto store. Yes, the plane will be examined prior to first flight but what then later? Cheap bolts fracture. Non aviation Rivets corrode. Lots of sketchy stuff flying.

  • @ludwigrieger7556
    @ludwigrieger7556 Před rokem +5

    I am in my 13 th year of scratch building my four place 260hp Bearhawk, according to my understanding it is one of the best in its class, ranging from the two place all the way to the 6 place in five models. Cant wait to fly mine

  • @Niftynefty
    @Niftynefty Před rokem

    All are awesome

  • @Jerry10939
    @Jerry10939 Před rokem +1

    The only taildragger planes I have flown are the Aeronca Champ and Decathlon.

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 Před 3 měsíci

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @itinensanzen
    @itinensanzen Před rokem +4

    Hi Sophie, i love all planes but the Superstol is just amazing. Nice video, keep up the good work.

  • @suniron
    @suniron Před rokem +8

    Hello from India. We should manufacture such beautiful planes in India ...these could be so useful in remote areas ...for supplying essentials ✨️ 👌 😍

  • @hermestresmegistrus
    @hermestresmegistrus Před rokem +1

    I have some experience with some bushes; They’re very beautiful to look at✨

    • @johnfairchild3421
      @johnfairchild3421 Před rokem

      I got into one. And man like to have not gotten out. But as A. Good. Warrior I went. Right back in til it was. Trimmed.inside out

  • @russasher6962
    @russasher6962 Před 11 měsíci +2

    My Grandfather took me to the little airport a few miles from their house.
    We'd sit in the car and watch the single engines take off and land.
    Still remember Fleet Week in the SF Bay and the Blue Angels flying under the bridge while standing on a submarine. 👍

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 11 měsíci

      It sounds like you have some wonderful memories of aviation! We can imagine how exciting it must have been to watch the planes take off and land, as well as witnessing Fleet Week and the Blue Angels in action. Those experiences must have truly left a lasting impression. We enjoy reading aviation stories like this. Thanks for sharing!

  • @user-tb8hz8qr1q
    @user-tb8hz8qr1q Před 9 měsíci +2

    Mẫu phi cơ của bạn rất tinh tế và ấn tượng, hay lắm cảm ơn video chia sẻ của bạn chúc bạn sức khỏe và hạnh phúc.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 8 měsíci

      Cảm ơn những nhận xét tích cực của bạn về mô hình máy bay! Rất vui vì bạn thích video này. Nếu có bất kỳ điều gì khác mà bạn muốn biết hoặc thảo luận về máy bay, đừng ngần ngại bắt đầu cuộc trò chuyện.

  • @edwardwerthner7717
    @edwardwerthner7717 Před rokem +1

    So much time to build these planes, but worth it

  • @el_nesto1844
    @el_nesto1844 Před 7 měsíci +1

    You have a lot of freedom in America, here in Spain you can make a kit plane but you need a lot of certificates so its cheaper to buy an already built one

  • @zablonskys1
    @zablonskys1 Před rokem +5

    I would prefer the Zenith , due to its retractable wings .

    • @JDStone-jg8cg
      @JDStone-jg8cg Před 11 měsíci

      I'd love to get a Zenith CH801 as it's a four seat version of the 701. Though it doesn't have the retractable wings . . .

  • @gamer7762
    @gamer7762 Před rokem

    Супер!!!

  • @meenubhai7055
    @meenubhai7055 Před rokem

    Love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @ayokay123
    @ayokay123 Před rokem +1

    Advantages/disadvantages of these STOLs versus say gyroplanes? They're both equally slow, but I've seen STOL experts take off in less than 30ft. in competitions.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      What's an "advantage" or "disadvantage"? You have to know what you WANT the aircraft to do. If you just want to get in the air the fastest, and don't care about anything else, then maybe a gyrocopter, if you're not one of those experts you mentioned.🙄

  • @neilkaippallil8390
    @neilkaippallil8390 Před rokem +2

    Approx Flight Travel range should be shown

  • @Backwards_Y
    @Backwards_Y Před rokem +4

    I noticed that you included the Kitfox aircraft speedster instead of the STI version which has beefed stol performance

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem

      That’s right. We might update this list with more value for money options soon.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem +2

      I just saw a separate vid on the Zenith. The claimed takeoff AND landing distance is 100 ft., with a rate of climb of 3000-4000 ft/min. That's what the manufacturer SAID, anyway. This is for the SuperSTOL XL (extra long?). The upped the HP from 100 to 180, and extended the fuselage 2 ft., moving the CG aft to compensate for the heavier engine.

  • @user-vb3zx9ht3e
    @user-vb3zx9ht3e Před 2 měsíci

    Greenhorn aboard… 🇺🇸♾️😎

  • @killingfields1424
    @killingfields1424 Před rokem +1

    Bearhawk

  • @War3lephant
    @War3lephant Před rokem

    So which one is the klr650 equivalent? Cheap, reliable takes a beating, does everything but not well.

  • @mishasumi6827
    @mishasumi6827 Před rokem +1

    40 inches wide? That is my shoulder to shoulder measurement. Lol

  • @jeffcardillo
    @jeffcardillo Před rokem +3

    "This kitfox costs over $41k US". The video isn't wrong... the green and black one from the video is up on trade-a-plane right now for $195k. That certainly is more.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      Still a kit in parts, or has somebody built a kit into a fully finished, flying aircraft? That could have something to do with it.

  • @timhuckabay
    @timhuckabay Před rokem +3

    The prices might be for unassembled kits without engines or avionics. They definitely aren’t for completed aircraft.

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta Před rokem

      buy used cessna can buy million used cessna 172-182 in usa, most popular plane what has made and used can buy 20K-50K normal 30K can buy ready to fly condition good cessna.

    • @treetopflight7624
      @treetopflight7624 Před rokem +1

      @@mattivirta new vs 50 year old plane needing engine overhaul. Decent 1970s 172 is around $80K.. Again, new vs 50 years old. No wrong answer, just different plane.

  • @philipcampbell7216
    @philipcampbell7216 Před rokem +8

    What is the range of each of these aircraft?

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      They don't talk about rollout, landing distance, or endurance, either, but I expect that the websites for each plane would list those data.

  • @johnrobinson1140
    @johnrobinson1140 Před rokem

    I think light sport or less than 1320 GVW is a better way to go, like a Carbon Cub for instance.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      If all you're taking from A too B is yourself, then could be. It just depends on what you want out of your plane. "Better" is a subjective term. If somebody wants to haul cargo, or get there quicker, have a higher ceiling or more range, "better" would probably be different for them.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      EDIT: That's, "A TO B". I hate spell-check.

  • @circusfactory
    @circusfactory Před rokem +2

    I wonder which dealer has the prices you mentioned. must be fire wall back prices?

    • @DanielHunterUSA
      @DanielHunterUSA Před 3 měsíci

      Yeah the price is right with out instruments and engine that would be more like $60,000

  • @ahmednegm9895
    @ahmednegm9895 Před rokem +8

    Murphy radical is the best

    • @murphyaircraft
      @murphyaircraft Před rokem

      With only 2 Radical flying, how can it be the best? The Murphy Rebel should be on this list based on price and actual flying "bush" airplanes.

    • @SuperOrangello
      @SuperOrangello Před rokem

      I don’t like the limited visibility out of the cabin

  • @AviationWP
    @AviationWP Před rokem

    The Zenith STOL CH 701 can accommodate up to four passengers? But if you want to take off you need to just have two, you know, in the two seats.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem

      Yes, you're absolutely correct. This ensures that the aircraft remains within its weight and balance limits and maintains safe operating conditions during this critical phase of flight. Apologies for the oversight!

    • @davidholubetz177
      @davidholubetz177 Před 8 měsíci

      I wouldn't trust anything you hear on CZcams ... this channel seems like AI with a bot voice transcript

  • @JRS2248
    @JRS2248 Před rokem +1

    Kitfox

  • @paulkysar6207
    @paulkysar6207 Před rokem

    Opps. Lush Amazon..... All the trees in the background were Douglas fir. They don't grow anywhere near the Amazon

  • @garrycompton7214
    @garrycompton7214 Před 5 měsíci

    Flew a 170 in Ak for over 20 years - soooo What size engines are in these birds - that's kind of Important !

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 5 měsíci

      That's amazing and you're absolutely right; the size and type of engines are crucial factors in evaluating aircraft performance. We'll do our best to add more relevant information in our future episodes.

  • @pekertimulia125
    @pekertimulia125 Před rokem

    What if gear of tyre should be tilted into body..

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      You mean retractable landing gear? Not done for this class of aircraft. Too complex, too heavy, too expensive, with unnecessary maintenance.

  • @porschetech72901
    @porschetech72901 Před rokem +1

    like the video good job.... prices are a bit off i think.... double or more for most part

  • @user-lu2cy9xv2z
    @user-lu2cy9xv2z Před dnem

    superstol has only 1 passenger seat, the other one is for a pilot

  • @ZeeCaptainRon
    @ZeeCaptainRon Před rokem +1

    I bet if you tried you could find even more annoying foreground music, since it sure isn't background music.

  • @DanielMorales-dz4nv
    @DanielMorales-dz4nv Před rokem

    This kind of bush planes are by far better than girocopters.

  • @DES2nd9512
    @DES2nd9512 Před 4 měsíci

    the kitfox series 7 speedster is not a bushplane.
    the kitfox series 7 STI however is a bush plane.

  • @bertclements
    @bertclements Před 4 měsíci +1

    What about Maule or Carbon Cub, too expensive?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 4 měsíci

      While the pricing varies, Maule and Carbon Cub are generally considered valuable investments for those seeking robust performance in bush flying. Do you have specific features or requirements in mind for a bush plane that you find essential?

  • @charliehampton2653
    @charliehampton2653 Před 10 měsíci

    Number one I am number two. Buy me one I like the blue one

  • @williamjmansfield8768
    @williamjmansfield8768 Před 6 měsíci

    Multiply prices by factor of 5

  • @williamhulsey9209
    @williamhulsey9209 Před rokem +3

    I have to say that the whole concept of seeking out the cheapest plane to trust your life to in the harsh flight environment of the bush is very much like looking for the lowest bid from a brain surgeon. In 6 years in Alaska my son's pastor and two passengers flew off apparently to be wth God, since they've never been seen since. a Beaver with six people was struck by another two seater flown by a State rep...all 7 people died in my son's back yard. I did meet an 85 year old bush pilot in Anchorage who had walked away from a handful of crashes. But really, guys, a bush plane is only a couple of steps safer than jumping off a mountain in a Wing Suit.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem +2

      We can understand your concern and apprehension regarding the safety of bush planes. It is true that flying in small aircraft, particularly in remote areas with harsh weather conditions, can be inherently risky. However, it is also important to note that many bush pilots are highly experienced and well-trained individuals who take safety very seriously. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to weigh the risks and benefits of flying in a bush plane, and to make an informed decision based on their personal comfort level and safety concerns.

    • @williamhulsey9209
      @williamhulsey9209 Před rokem

      @@AviationFederation when I worked for the air force at Tinker AFB just out of college I met a lot of small plane enthusiasts. Many had bought surplus Stearman's after the war. Heard no horror stories, although I met one guy who had lived on an acreage outside Wichita with a Supercub? Who took off by attaching a cable to a swiveling post and going round and round in a circle till he was airborne and then releasing the cable. But once I spent time in Alaska I realized that an awful lot of the pilots I met or heard about tended to think flying was just only slightly different from driving a car. Not true at all, I thought your article might appeal to folks like that. Lost a couple of good friends in S Texas flying home from Houston (school architect and two school board members) because the red hang tag in the cockpit that showed some of the controls were locked had faded and torn in two. Crashed on takeoff. And then there was the local young crop duster took up the elementary school librarian to show her how safe flying was. Fatal crash in a cotton field outside Sinton. My wife's uncle and his brother flew commercial jets for their whole working life. In their 80's now, so obviously......a safe pilot is one from the deep end of the gene pool.....shallow end maybe not (I would count myself in the shallow end, based on 50 years of mishaps).

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home Před rokem

      Living here for over 40 years I know many people who went right from flying a plane to getting angel wings. I’ve had jobs where I was flown all over the state in different types of aircraft from Beavers on floats to Citation Jets and helicopters. I’ve had a few exciting flights. I even had a 7ECA Champion for 8 years about 40 years ago. It cost only $9,000 in 1985.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      Well said, AF.

  • @bushpilot1074
    @bushpilot1074 Před 11 měsíci +2

    Ch 701 4 seat ...... come on ... this video is full of mistake
    . you talk about canada bush flying ... but you dont have the levitation and pegazair aircraft who are specific desigh in canada for canada .

  • @waltersempticowski1794

    I think Bush airplanes amazing but I think that they fly only in US, just because I have never seen one of them here in Brazil.😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem +1

      Bush airplanes are indeed incredible, designed for rugged terrain and remote locations. While they are commonly associated with the United States, their popularity extends beyond its borders. While it may be less common to see them in Brazil, there are enthusiasts and pilots who appreciate the versatility and capabilities of bush planes worldwide. While the specific models and availability may vary by region, the spirit of bush flying and adventure can be enjoyed in various countries around the world.

    • @waltersempticowski1794
      @waltersempticowski1794 Před rokem

      @@AviationFederation thanks 4 the feedback

  • @iaf010
    @iaf010 Před rokem +1

    I think these are prices without engines - because no way these aircraft are these cheap

  • @coeniethomas1887
    @coeniethomas1887 Před rokem +1

    How do you fit 4 people into a CH701?

    • @pfer10
      @pfer10 Před rokem

      2 in the seats and 2 on top of the wings. Lol

    • @juanbaitx8740
      @juanbaitx8740 Před rokem +2

      CH 801 it's a 4 place ulm

    • @mattivirta
      @mattivirta Před rokem +1

      @@juanbaitx8740 perfect have small economy 4-seat plane. go to city to city cheap plane shopping or holiday trip.

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      Speedos or bikinis (depending), cocoa butter, and a big shoe horn. Preferably, they'll also all be good at "Twister".
      Or make the 3 who are not the pilot 6 years old or less.

  • @soundmandave21
    @soundmandave21 Před 23 dny

    Your prices are way off. You are quoting fuselage kit prices that are missing firewall forward components which is the most expensive part...

  • @loriscandy
    @loriscandy Před rokem +2

    Prices are definitely not up to date... or maybe they are the kits' prices with no engine nor instruments.

    • @treetopflight7624
      @treetopflight7624 Před rokem

      Prices are clearly kit prices WITHOUT engine (30K-40K), without avionics (minimum 20K-40K), and without paint (10K-$20K)..

  • @user-eq8pi2yu2w
    @user-eq8pi2yu2w Před rokem

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @robertg9514
    @robertg9514 Před rokem +2

    There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊

  • @mojaveclimber
    @mojaveclimber Před rokem

    Hinged from the top,opens from the bottom. Zenith 701 four passengers I doubt it. 200 lbs x4 =800 lbs with a gross weight of 1100 lbs.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem

      You raise a valid point regarding the passenger capacity of the Zenith 701. The calculation of passenger capacity should take into account the weight limitations and ensure that the aircraft remains within its maximum gross weight and center of gravity limits. Thank you for pointing out our oversight. It's important for pilots and operators to thoroughly understand and adhere to the aircraft's limitations to ensure safe and compliant operations.

  • @mikeh7390
    @mikeh7390 Před rokem +9

    None of these numbers are accurate.

    • @jarkom9
      @jarkom9 Před rokem

      Pure bullshit whole video

  • @user-lb7wg9ig3e
    @user-lb7wg9ig3e Před 6 měsíci

    MOUL???

  • @antonioiozzi9171
    @antonioiozzi9171 Před rokem

    Much confusion in the title and description. The price you mention are kitprices and not that of a finished one. No engine, not elecronic and instruments. Showing the Kitfox Speedster that is the acro version of the S7 say everything.

  • @edcew8236
    @edcew8236 Před 9 měsíci +2

    Hmm. Designed for Canada? Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are American planes designed for the homebuilder. Hmm.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 9 měsíci

      You bring up an interesting observation about the nationality and design focus of the aircraft in the list. Indeed, many homebuilt aircraft, including the ones in the list, originate from the United States and cater to the homebuilder community. Design considerations often reflect the needs and preferences of the local aviation culture and regulations. Do you have any thoughts on how aircraft designed for specific regions (especially in North America) might differ in terms of features or suitability for certain missions?

  • @juemuri5448
    @juemuri5448 Před rokem

    ob es je möglich sein würde, ein kleines flugzeug zu bauen, welches nahezu jeder autofahrer fliegen könnte ?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem +1

      Es gibt Experimentalflugzeuge, die Sie ohne Lizenz fliegen können, aber wir empfehlen es nicht.

    • @juemuri5448
      @juemuri5448 Před rokem

      @@AviationFederation das war ja nicht meine frage...ich kann mir sogar als laie vorstellen, wie schwierig das umzusetzen wäre...es geht also um die konstruktion eines fliegers, der mit hilfe eines pc und eines fluglaien zu fliegen wäre...ich sehe das ja auch in einem anderen bereich = boote. selbst segeln würde n laie so hinbekommen, dass er wieder nach hause kommt. die konstruktion ist da allerdings schon komplizierter als bei einer motoryacht...aber lieben dank für die antwort.

  • @charlesspringer4709
    @charlesspringer4709 Před rokem +1

    5 Cheapest? Not by a mile. For example, where is the Savannah?

    • @LanPiloto
      @LanPiloto Před rokem

      Al do a savannah is great airplane actually the best ive flown but unfortunately they aren't as popular in the US its mostly the zenith that is similar

  • @donaldconnolly3627
    @donaldconnolly3627 Před rokem

    THAT BARROWS TAKES OFF AS SHORT AS A CHINOOK.....AND YOU GET
    A REAL PLANE

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars Před rokem +1

    A kit plane is not cheap. Kinda tired of these videos alleging such an erroneous contention. To make a full and fair apples-apples comparison of aircraft prices you MUST include the cost of the engine (not included in kits), avionics (not included in kits), and the gorilla in the room, the LABOR to complete the build.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před rokem

      You raise a valid point. While kit planes may appear to be cheaper than ready-to-fly aircraft at first glance, the additional costs you mentioned, such as the engine and avionics, can add up quickly. Furthermore, building a kit plane requires a significant investment of time and labor, which must also be factored into the total cost. That's precisely why many enthusiasts consider this a labor of love! It's essential to carefully consider all of these factors before making a decision about whether a kit plane is a cost-effective choice for your aviation needs.

  • @murphyaircraft
    @murphyaircraft Před rokem

    This list is definitely not accurate and independent opinion of the poster. There are other inexpensive kit "bush planes" that should have made this list.

  • @pekertimulia125
    @pekertimulia125 Před rokem

    Surely fly silently indeed..!

  • @701Builder
    @701Builder Před rokem +1

    STOL short takeoff or landing. Just say The word. 2 passengers only though.

  • @billhalbert7955
    @billhalbert7955 Před rokem +1

    If you want real value in a bush plane just buy used Maule M-4 or 5. They are powered by real airplane engines, not the snowmobile engine powered airplanes you recommended.

  • @janniemeyer9951
    @janniemeyer9951 Před 6 měsíci

    No STOL distances. Too little info to compare or even give a rating.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 5 měsíci

      Thanks for highlighting the importance of STOL capabilities. Are there specific aircraft models or features you're particularly interested in regarding STOL performance?

  • @crazycomboj8061
    @crazycomboj8061 Před 10 měsíci

    इंडिया इस वरी लूगर कंट्री

  • @Watson1
    @Watson1 Před 10 měsíci +1

    You really need to get your facts right before making a statement.

  • @corex72
    @corex72 Před 9 měsíci

    Still cheaper than a new hilux.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 8 měsíci

      Who needs a Hilux when you can take your bush plane to the grocery store? Just imagine the parking space!

  • @rubenrodriguez-qq2dv
    @rubenrodriguez-qq2dv Před 8 měsíci

    No thank you

  • @ozarklanding
    @ozarklanding Před 10 měsíci +1

    701 is a 2 place bird, not 4…

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Před 10 měsíci

      You're absolutely right, the Zenith CH 701 is a two-seater aircraft known for its versatility and rugged design. Sorry for the oversight! Have you had the chance to fly or work with one of these?

    • @ozarklanding
      @ozarklanding Před 10 měsíci

      @@AviationFederation Yes. I’ve flown in one and about to start building mine.

  • @robertg9514
    @robertg9514 Před rokem +1

    There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊

    • @kellyrobinson1780
      @kellyrobinson1780 Před rokem

      Beginner level powered hang glider? I'm guessing that's gotta be under $2K?