The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 04. 2024
- Throughout history, there have been monarchs whose reigns were exceptionally short, lasting only days, hours, or even minutes. One such example is Louis-Antoine, Duke of Angoulême, who briefly held the title of King of France for just 20 minutes following his father's abdication in 1830. Another notable case is King Louis XIX of France, who technically reigned for just 20 minutes after his father's abdication in 1830 but never actually exercised power. These short-lived reigns highlight the volatile nature of monarchy during certain periods in history.
👋 Hey! Welcome to World Data 3D 🌎
My name is Timur. I'm professional 3d modeling artist. I make my videos with Unity 3d and Blender software.
Here are the main steps how I create a video 💻📽 :
💡 First of all I come up with a topic. Then I collect the necessary information from statistical sites, forums, discussions in various communities (All sources can be found below). Then I start assembling the scene. When the scene is ready, with the help of a neural network, I create unique cantileveres and make a preview. After this I'm looking for music on youtube creative studio or fair use sites. Finally I do video editing with Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects.
⚠
My videos are for entertainment purposes only.
Figures and facts at the time of creating video and watching it - may be strikingly different. Everything is purely individual. Don't forget about this.
All the videos are created by myself. Copying without permission - prohibited
⚠
🎵 Track: Egzod, Maestro Chives, Neoni - Royalty [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
Watch: • Egzod & Maestro Chives...
Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/Royalty
🥰😍 If you like my content hit subscribe button 👍
My social networks ⬇⬇⬇
LinkedIn - / timur-gorgodze-981546b0
TikTok - / worlddatavideo
Instagram - / timurgorgodze
👔 For business inquiries: 👉 timurgorgodze@gmail.com
DISCLAIMER: This comparison is based on public data, surveys, public comments & discussions and approximate estimations that might be subjected to some degree of error - Zábava
Hello. How do you like the video?
Where is Aurangazeb Alamgir ??
Who ruled nearly 50years in Hindustan ( United India-Pakistan-Bangladesh)
And what criteria did you use to make the list? There are no Russian mtnarkhs at all, although Ivan the Terrible ruled for more than 50 years.
Juana ok UK, 9 days
La reine Élisabeth II est techniquement le monarque régnant le plus longtemps au monde de toute façon car les huit premières années du «règne» de Louis XIV étaient en fait sous une régence - sa mère a appelé tous les coups pendant ces années.
This list is so ridiculous incomplete, it is not even funny anymore. What are your exact criteria? Why using Monarchs in reign at the moment? Why do some monarchies have multiple entries, why some not at all? Why do you start with longest reigns when it should be about shortest reigns? It is frankly a large mess.
King Charles III is still king so that's a very odd monarch to include
He is very old and wouldn't last much longer.
@@Quarequieus Agreed. At 75 he is old and has been ill recently but is still the King of the United Kingdom. Plus his mother was 96 when she passed and his grandmother 101 so hopefully he has a good few years left in him
@@kevinmcfarlane2545 Forgot to mention that his father almost made it to hundred.
@@QuarequieusI’ve got 💰 riding on him getting to 80.
Louis XIX
His approximately twenty minute "reign" makes him the shortest reigning monarch for the time being, reportedly spent listening to his wife and her pleas not to sign the abdication...😂😂😂
What's the criteria to be included on this list? Because plenty of monarchs are missing. Also it's tittled "shortest" in history but includes the longest. Perhaps current monarchs should be a seprate list? But anyways, King Charles has officially surpassed his Uncle, Edward VIII who abdicated.
Es fehlen
- Friedrich III., deutscher Kaiser, 99 Tage, Deutsches Reich
- Johannes Paul I., Papst, 33 Tage, Vatikanstadt
Da fehlen unzählige Herrscher da dieses Video im Grunde den Anspruch erhebt, alle Monarchen abzubilden, was allerdings kaum machbar wäre, aber du hast recht, Kaiser Friedrich III. bzw. IV und Johannes Paul I. hätte man schon erwähnen sollen.
0:41
his name is not Emperor Showa, he is Emperor Hirohito (showa is name of an era, used like adjective in this context in Japan)
Eperor Showa is what he is called in Japan. You don't use the name of an emperor, living or dead.
@@klausolekristiansen2960 I AM A JAPANESE AND WELL UNDERSTAND ABOUT JAPAN
Showa is not his name, and is the name of an era (repetition), so in that situation, Emperor hirohito is definitely appropriate though both are usually OK
And you MUST know the name of emperors are occasionally used and it's not necessarily rude particularly in Japan
Thank you for the update, World Data 3D..!! Awesome 3D animation work..!!
Where is Juan Carlos I of Spain? His reign was from November 1975 until June 2014
You missed Maximilian, Emperor Mexico who reigned for 3 years and Agustin the first, first ruler of the Mexican Empire also in the 1800s. A lot of omissions for several countries on this coundown.
Nobody: There's a king of United Kingdom called Bob and he was knighted in 1968 and was king for 8 hours.
He wasn't a king, as far as my research goes
@@TGamesTmedia01 i am just joking
@@TGamesTmedia01 r/whooooosh
Love the Style of your videos World Data go on like that! ❤
Mexico had 2 monarchies after its independence and neither lasted 5 years, the first with Agustin de Iturbide lasted just 11 months and the second with Maximilian of Habsburg lasted only 4 years, not to mention that both monarchs were executed when they were dethroned.
Queen Magarethe II of Denmark?
You forgot Lady Jane Grey - 9 days. Elizabeth I - 45 years. Henry VIII - 38 years. Mary I - 5 years. Edward VI - 6 years. Edward V - 3 months.
This video was published a few minutes ago, but this is cool
Lady Jane Grey British Monarch For 9 Days
What about Queen Margrethe II of Denmark? Surely if her son and king charles has been mentioned?
Good video ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
The first viewer, I actually love the song background ❤❤❤
Same bro ❤❤
That one guy who ruled Catalonia for 8 seconds:
No mention of the kings of Belgium. Why?
Lady Jen grey😢
shortest time to rule starts from 72 years.
oh thank god
I just love this vids general culture is garented
is full of mistakes, don´t take this "infomration" seriously
Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan Is President Of The United Arab Emirates Not Monarch.
Where are sultan suleiman 1 ottoman empire 46 years👎
Why is there no King Yeongjo, the 21st king of the Joseon Dynasty, the last dynasty in Korean history? He was a monarch who was crowned on October 5, 1724 and died on April 11, 1776.
0:06 Long live the Queen!
my guy she's already dead
She lived for a long time
It's still the same. The red watermark on the back looks more comfortable. ...
It looks more comfortable without the red watermark. ...
ちょっと待て、徳仁天皇陛下はご在位中だぞ。短くて当然だ。
hey wait !! His Majesty Emperor Naruhito is currently on the throne, so it is only natural that his reign will be short huh?!
チャールズ国王も在命中だよね
¿de dónde sale que Fernando Vii de España (Spain) reinó durante 48 días?
There are so much mistakes in this: some monarchies having multiple entries, others have none at all, starting with the longest reigns, including multiple monarchs who are on the trone today. It almost looks like this all is done deliberately to generate comments.
Also some seem to be lifespan not reign
Where's Queen Margrethe of Denmark or Queen Beatrix and Juliana of The netherlands.
Elizabeth, the 1st of united-kingdom or have the UK monsrchs
Where is Haile Selassie(Rastafari)?
0:09 2:33 King bhumibol adulyadej and King vajiralongkorn 🙏🇹🇭👑
RIP Charles III...
He's Still alive
@@pedanticradiator1491 i was sarcastic...
You include many kings that are still alive which is wrong as you do not know for how long they will rule for example the kings of Spain, Netherlands etc
What about Jane Grey?
What about Sultan Qaboos bin Said bin Taimur of Oman? He reigned for 49 years.
You missed Lady Jane Grey - she was proclaimed Queen & ruled England for 9 days
時代背景を考えると、明治天皇がないのはどういうこと？
Gaming Keyboards, Gaming Mouse, Gaming Headphones, Computer Speakers, Gaming Steering Wheels, Gaming Chairs, PC, Marvo scorpion what country is it? Please.
Anda que no falta reyes aquí, empezando por los de España y el más reciente Juan Carlos I que estuvo casi 40 años reinando y esos que he visto de América habría que verificarlo
Who is Michael II reign 5 hours
The period of Emperor Taisho, Yoshihito in Japan is about 15 years.
Если ролик называется "Самые недолговечные монархи в истории", то для соответствия названию следовало бы указывать только тех, кто правил не более одного года и не включать в график ныне правящих монархов, вроде Чарльза III или Харальда V.
How you forgot geddafi ?
He wasnt a monarch
You should have put roman emperors too
❤🎉❤🎉❤🎉
Where is Ramsess II of Egypt?
Y Jane Grey?
❤❤❤
King Charles 111 is still reigning so shouldn't be on the list.
А теперь самое длинное правление не монарха
Естествено лиза 2 и король солнце при котором похорошел версаль
You missed the Persian kings
Falto agustin I de mexico 1821-1823
Pedro 1 brasil y 4 Portugal
Gorge V y VI reinó Unido
Edurdo7 y y 8 RU.
Faltaron muchos emperadores de mexico ahí están era del valle mexico
Margareth II of Danmark 52 years
Where are Sapa Incas of Tawantinsuyo?
How about Pope John Paul I in 1978?
🤔🙂👍. 🫀
Queen for 9 days
Es un vídeo engañoso porque muchos reyes aún están reinando.
Title is wrong. Should be longest reign.
You should do more research. Some one pointed about India. Use Wikipedia.
In China, you left so many kings n emperors reigns more than 40 years
I cant see Ramses II
this is a chaotic video full of mistakes! Ferdinand VII ruled Spains since 1813 untill his dead in 1833, 20 years of reign. Andorra is a state with two rulers the bishop of Catalonia and the president of France....and why you put this random list of monarchs? have any sense at all
III. Charles öldü mü?
No
Пётр III не учтён: 6-7 месяцев.
Why is there no King Jangsu, the 20th king of Goguryeo? His reign lasted 79 years and 2 months, and he died at the age of 97. He was a monarch who had to watch his child die in his 60s.
Non, ces informations n'ont pas été vérifiés et ne peuvent plus l'être maintenant. Le pays n'était pas souverain et n'était pas reconnu par la communauté internationale, d'autant plus qu'il y a une différence entre roi et chef. De plus, toutes ces histoires peuvent être inventés par les pays pour s'approprier le record ou le contester.
@@Idj3.5-0 Goguryeo était souverain et est apparu dans les archives et a existé pendant 700 ans, sans quoi la dynastie Sui de Chine aurait-elle envahi Goguryeo en Corée avec une armée de 1,13 million de soldats ? Et lorsque le roi Jangsu de Goguryeo est mort, il a été confirmé que c’était il y a 79 ans, mais lorsque le roi Jangsu de Goguryeo est mort, il existe des archives en Chine et en Mongolie selon lesquelles les rois d’autres pays voisins ont payé un tribut au roi Jangsu de Goguryeo, qui a vécu penda
@@Idj3.5-0 Et le Yeongjo de Joseon est clairement enregistré, alors pourquoi Yeongjo n’apparaît-il pas après avoir vécu plus de 80 ans ? Il est du 18ème siècle.
@@Idj3.5-0 L’histoire de la Corée est plus longue que ne le pensent les Européens, et les manuels coréens enseignent que le premier pays était Gojoseon, qui a été fondé en 2333 av. J.-C., mais les universitaires disent que ce n’est pas le cas, mais on estime toujours qu’il se situe dans les années 900 de notre ère, ce qui est plus long que Rome
@@Idj3.5-0 En premier lieu, l’origine du mot Corée vient de Goryeo, l’un des pays qui ont succédé à Goguryeo, mais comment Goguryeo peut-il ne pas être un pays ? La différence entre un patriarche et un roi ? En ce sens, l’empire mongol de Gengis Khan n’était pas un État, Goguryeo était un pays mi-nomade et mi-agricole, et c’était un pays qui avait l’une des cavaleries les plus puissantes d’Asie du Nord-Est à cette époque, les samouraïs Gaema, et Goguryeo était le seul pays multiethnique de l’histoire de la
Mizan Zainal Abidin of Malaysia was NOT a monarch! He was prime minister. NOT "Kingdom of France", correct: "French Kingdom". Best wishes, Erwin Hoheisel, Eppstein (Germany)
WHAT??!!
He still the current Sultan of Terengganu. (State in Malaysia)
Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin from 1998 until now.
He is NOT Prime Minister, who are you? Where did you get this shit from?? He was the King of Malaysia (Yang di-Pertuan Agong) from 2006 to 2011.
Also, Kingdom of France is correct. What the hell is wrong with you? Joking??
Bruh he is not Prime Minister
Ok this is unfair to Andorra those weren’t their fault
Tut
Garrison
Pedro II🇧🇷
Some Popes are missing! They are monarchs too
Queen Elizabeth was the longest reigning monarch!!!!
Only in Britain
Queen Élisabeth II est deuxième, derrière Louis XIV
Where is ottoman sultans ?
First 🥇
Wheres Jane Grey? She ruled for 6 days.
9
Louis XIV 🗿🗿🗿🗿
Władysław II Jagiełło był najdłużej panującym królem Polski bo 48 lat rządził
QUEEN ELİZABETH I 🇬🇧
SULTAN SÜLEİMAN THE MAGNİFİCENT 🇹🇷
QUEEN MARGRETHE II🇩🇰
QUEEN JULİANA 🇳🇱
365 days
King Charles is still ruling.
A bit distasteful to include him. Given his medical situation
also Felipe VI of Spain , Frederik of Denmark , William of Netherland, Naruhito of Japan, etc...is chaotic and totally random
Иван Грозный?
🇹🇭คนไทยครับ
Królowa Elżbieta II najdłużej panującym monarchą Wielkiej Brytanii była
Where are Indian kings? 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
He forgot,probably
Dud Indian history is soo fucking Confusing
Indias monarchs where on the Level of principality not kingdom so they didn't include them because then they would have 560 german princes and archdukes to put in😅
One small princely state in India probably had a larger population than England in the Middle Ages though
At hell
Myanmar king pyu saw htee 75
あれ大正天皇がいないよ
아무나 대충 집어넣은것 같은데
1 like
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
Second
1st comment 😂😂
아니 조선의 왕은 왜 없어 이 인종차별주의자야!
First place legitimately belongs to Queen Elizabeth II! Louis XIV was 4 years old when he became king but he did not understand or realise anything and other personalities ruled on his behalf. So Louis ruled officially for only 58 years! And Elizabeth II was 25 years old when she became Queen, which is fair and constitutionally correct.
Je trouve toujours extrêmement difficile de croire que Sa Majesté la reine Élisabeth II n’est plus là - elle était comme la meilleure amie de tout le monde.
Non la première place revient bien à Louis XIV, car vous mélangez deux pays différents et deux époques différentes donc des règles différentes. On compte à partir de la mort du parent ou de son abdication. Donc Louis XIV est bien devenu roi à cet âge et Élisabeth II aussi, mais elle a régné moins longtemps. Louis XIV était le roi. Il faut pas nier sa jeunesse.
@@Idj3.5-0 I don't see what relevance age and century has here? If Elizabeth II became queen at the age of 4, she would have ruled for 92 years and you would call that an "Exact Time" of reign?
@@lukanurijanyan1077 If we look at verifiable reigns by exact date, it is still Louis XIV who holds the record for the longest reign for a sovereign state monarch (i.e. internationally recognized as sovereign for all or most of the reign). Having become king at four and a half years old, he will have spent 72 years and 110 days on the throne of the Kingdom of France, and is therefore ahead of Queen Elizabeth II by a little more than two years. Elizabeth II reigned less long than Louis XIV. This in no way prevents us from saying that being second is already very good! especially for a queen who recognized that the king of France was first.
@@lukanurijanyan1077 In reality, you are confusing the 2 reigns, which you should not do. The only difference is that the Queen of England was old enough to rule when her father died. While the king of France was too young. But he is the legitimate king, he is the direct son of the previous king. So we set up the regency. The regency ensures the continuity of government while waiting for the sovereign to be able to assume his responsibilities. The person who exercises power as regent acts on behalf of the sovereign, so the minor or incapacitated sovereign is still considered the king or queen, even if they do not actively participate in government. The regent acts on his behalf and exercises royal authority until the sovereign is able to take control himself. However, the king is the king, and therefore Louis XIV was indeed the legitimate king. It's simply that some countries want to compete and be in bad faith, that's all. And for Elizabeth II, with the different living conditions of the time of Louis XIV, well she lived longer but her reign was shifted later, and shorter, that's all.
มีประเทศไทยด้วย รักท่านคับ ❤️❤️🇹🇭🇹🇭🇹🇭❤️❤️
You forgot Jane Grey