The Prosecution's Final Witnesses - NY v. Jonathan Majors Day | Trial Day 7 Recap
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 04. 2024
- ⭐️ Go to ground.news/legalbytes to see through manipulative, biased news. Subscribe
through my link this month only to try it for free. Thanks again to Ground News for sponsoring this video!
On December 4, 2023, NY v. Jonathan Majors kicked off with opening statements and its first witness testimony. This is the recap of Day 7 of this trial.
FOR CONTEXT:
New York prosecutors allege that on March 24, 2023, actor Jonathan Majors physically assaulted his then-girlfriend, Grace Jabbari in the back seat of a hired driver's car before throwing her back into the car after she tried to get out. Jabbari says that as a result of this altercation, she suffered a fractured right middle finger, a cut to her right ear, and bruising to her head. Majors, on the other hand, disputes the characterization of the altercation: he says she attacked him, and that he suffered scratches on his face and body as a result, and that he threw her into the car so he could get away from her before she tried chasing him down on the streets of New York.
Playlist for all NY v. Jonathan Majors videos: • NY v. Jonathan Majors ...
TIME STAMPS:
0:00 Introduction
3:31 Officer Erik Lucero
5:00 Sergeant Bryan Hanson
5:29 The 911 Call
13:02 Ben Totty (Jabbari's Choreography Talent Manager)
13:44 Josie Torielli (DV Expert)
18:53 The Big Questions
21:03 What Do YOU Think?
To Become a Member of Byte Club, you can pick between YT, Locals, or Patreon:
YT Members: / @legalbytesmedia
Locals: legalbytes.locals.com
Patreon: / legalbytes
--------------------
🚨 Our podcast:
Anchor: anchor.fm/legalbytes
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4i3YLop...
Apple Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Google Podcast: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
--------------------
🚨 We have a @LegalBytes Clips channel for clips from our live streams. Subscribe here: / @legalbytesclips4042
--------------------
Follow me here!
Twitter: / legalbytesmedia
Instagram: / legalbytesmedia
Facebook: / legalbytesmedia
--------------------
🫖 Dragon's Treasure Teas: Visit www.thedragonstreasure.com/?d... for 10% off some delicious teas and to support this channel!
--------------------
Merch: legal-bytes.creator-spring.com
--------------------
#JonathanMajors #GraceJabbari #JonathanMajorsTrial
⭐ Go to ground.news/legalbytes to see through manipulative, biased news. Subscribe
through my link this month only to try it for free. Thanks again to Ground News for sponsoring this video!
I see too much reasonable doubt myself. It feels like a railroad job against him. He's not perfect. May be a complete jerk. But im not hearing enough to convict him on that night.
This is absolutely bananas. I don’t believe the State did enough
@@savvyguy1353they did enough alright, enough to screw over a black man
Agreed
Exactly. He might be a creep but the prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
When you are a black man in court under an abuse charges in america
Disney was quick to give him the official “do not come back” 🥶
didn't disney just have the biggest flop of the year release?
I think they wanted to get rid of the Kang character after Ant-Man flop
@@jimmyjam5453it made almost $500M.
which is their right as a business, at least they waited! I think he was gone regardless; Kang wasn't hitting with the audience. Ant Man 3 flopped. A report came out months ago that they may bring in Dr Doom, but getting rid of him during the trial would be nasty on their part.
@kicknowledgesmith8608 Kang the character was literally the only thing worthwhile in that movie and another actor won't bring the same skill, so dump the character.
Damn!!! A woman can take a man's phone, assault him verbally AND physically, CHASE HIM for 5 blocks, lock him out of HIS APARTMENT, he calls 911 and he is still arrested, charged, prosecuted and convicted! WTF!!! No mention of her abusing him and his life is destroyed. WTF!!!
#LEAVEALLWOMENALONE
Another 🔴pill
A black man and white girlfriend nonetheless. This is America
No justice.... again.
While both Grace and Jonathan likely had several red flags each to wave around and both probably should have gotten out of this relationship before it ever came to this, they are where they are now. A curious side effect to this case and food for thought for Grace: how many men are getting in the "I can't wait to date Grace Jabbari next!" line? Are there any in that line who have seen the videos of you taking his phone, chasing him down the street, creating a scene not just in public but in the middle of traffic at a red light (just creating a scene in public by itself is a big red flag, BTW)? Grace, you really have to question their motives and their sanity. Good luck on the dating scene, gurl! Jonathan will have his problems dating, too, but the issues Grace has in store for her are probably much worse.
@@Arthur_King_of_the_Britons Yes and these situations is why the red pill exist.
This came out after his guilty verdict on 2 of the 4 counts where the jury "split the baby" so to speak. And while I think that your explanation about burden of proof and reasonable doubt is the one that I have always understood just as a layperson, it really makes me wonder what the jury instructions were from the judge about the state's burden and about reasonable doubt, or even just the instructions on the charges at all, because I'm hearing different stories on that...
I don't know if I'm going to follow cases anymore without being to watch them because this one was frustrating -- I don't understand it at all based upon the evidence and what I know of the law, but I also don't want to bag on the jury or any specific attorneys, because I don't know what the jury did or didn't see, or what they were instructed or not instructed, or any of that. It seems like they made a very difficult to understand compromise more based on a "well we gotta find him for something so let's figure out something to find him guilty on", rather than following legal standards. It's hard to know what's going on in their minds or what happened in the room -- there was a long deliberation for just 6 people on misdemeanors, so it makes me think there must have been some confusion in the case on what they were deliberating on.
It's really easy in America you can never ever manhandle a white woman. When he lifted her up and put her back in the car. That by definition is assault. And then when he told her off for being an alcoholic that's harassment. The law can be used any which way they want. If you are rich and black do not live in America. Unless you like court proceedings
I think the problem is most people have trouble thinking in a systematic, logical way. Jury instructions don’t matter if the jury simply doesn’t have the ability to understand instructions.
@@NoahStephens the law is about being reasonable. The jury will convict you if they think you're not being reasonable. But when they charge you with a tonne of stuff. You always end up catching at least one
I could deal with this verdict if she has been prosecuted and found guilty for what she did. Split the culpability. I knew the part where he put her in the car could be troublesome, but it's annoying how she wasn't held accountable for attacking him in the car or chasing and grabbing him in the streets
@@NoahStephens why the jury system doesn't exist in most countries. Look it up. This is unique to the United States and personally i think it's a stupid system
Since the day I've found your channel, you've continued to get info out post haste and with such an honest and objective point of view! I thank you for all the great and honest content!🙌🏾 Look forward to seeing your channel skyrocket!🚀
Thank you so much!! I'm glad you've enjoyed the coverage, and I look forward to seeing you around here in the future with more cases!
Agreed and well said OP! Don’t worry I will be shouting out Alyte and her amazing work on JRE 🙃
I don't know how the jury was able to convict beyond a reasonable doubt based on the evidence that was available to people outside of the courtroom. It seems to me that the jury didn't like him and wanted view him as a bad guy. It was also interesting that there wasn't a single black male on the jury pool. It opens up the conviction to scrutiny beyond the facts of the case in a society that perceives the courtroom as a place that is disproportionately against black male defendents. Even if that is an arguable position to take. It exist and should have been taken into account. As a person born in New York city I find it hard to believe that they couldn't agree on one black, Dominican, Puerto Rican, or otherwise melinated man that they could agree on.
Easily he literally admitted to it
All white jury. Not surprising at all.
Not everything is about racism
@@dislexyc Something said only by white folks.
He called himself a monster in the text, said he was undeserving of love and tried to manipulate her with threats of ending his own life. He also had a text telling her not to get medical attention, to protect his career, they got him on 2nd degree harassment for this, they established a pattern of abuse in the form of harassment/emotional abuse, abuse isn't just physical. As far as assault, it was 3rd degree, they found him reckless, he didn't have to touch her at all, he could have gotten out the car and ran away without touching her. The other 2 more serious charges were dropped. They aren't saying he beat her up, but he was reckless. Not everything is racial. Either way you look at this, Majors needs help, he needs better team around him, and he needs to vet women better.
The water is too muddy! He should NOT have been found guilty. Makes me sad for him. Unfair trial outcomes in my opinion.
I do not think that the prosecution has proven that he did assault her. Honestly, what I believe happened was just that they got into a physical altercation, and Majors and Jabbari hurt each other through the altercation.
I’ve been checking and checking and here you are with the breakdown
Thank you so much for your patience!!
Thank you for covering this and for weighing the testimony so carefully.
Just pushing her in the SUV , caught on camera, could be considered assault, but, I don't think he should spend any time in jail.
If that can legally be considered assault, then the law is *very* irrational.
Thank you LegalBytes! ⚖️
Huh. Well. I can only assume this is because there are no cameras in the courtroom because I’m not quite understanding this verdict. He shouldn’t have pushed her but by the video itself she’s coming after him. That seems like self defense?He doesn’t seem like a great guy in general but that’s besides the point. Curious what more went on in the courtroom
Curious, what did he do that says he's not a great guy?
@@Meng776 seems pretty obvious he was cheating on her, his recorded statement about her needing to act like michelle Obama and he’s a great guy are pretty ridiculous. Additionally he has admitted to being violent as a teen both in public and at home, which doesn’t look good (although people can always change). Do I think he necessarily deserves to lose his career over this? I’m not sure what the jury saw, but I’m not totally convinced. Would I ever be interested in dating or being friends with this man? Absolutely not.
@@ViennaDarlingvd 📸4K.
@ViennaDarlingvd I'm just curious.. wanting your woman to be like Michele Obama or miss king is a bad thing ... wanting support from your partner makes you a bad person? Really trying to understand your perspective there.
@@ViennaDarlingvd What's wrong with telling your girl she needs to act like a lady like Michelle Obama and not an obnoxious drunk because you have a very high profile career? Seems fine to me, of course he should have sought out a lady to be his gf in the first place instead of trying to "turn a hoe into a housewife" but that's just a rookie mistake, doesn't make him a bad person.
I know the news correspondent SAID they “split the baby” but if you look at WHICH charges they chose it makes sense:
They’re saying he didn’t intentionally hurt her in any way.
He did intentionally ANNOY her.
He did hurt her accidentally/recklessly.
What evidence is there of him harming grace Jabari???
The jury must have evidence we didn’t see because they shouldn’t have convicted him with the evidence we have seen.
Things like tone and mannerism make a huge difference
@politereminder6284 I'm guessing it was from the part of the video when he was struggling to put her in the car but she ended up hitting her head against it first. Which feels like a loophole they chose to get away with so they could charge him with something
@@GothamThotSlayer It was definitely that, though it should be cleared as he acted in self defense but I don't know if the defense tried to make that case to the jury.
@@sirflappington2484they didn’t try self defense and they should have
I love that you have a sponsor. Congrats
The only eyewitness in the car and apparently the jury thinks he was lieing...his testimony is enough by itself for reasonable doubt.
We have seen more conclusive assault cases fail. Hands down. This to me is a show trial. DV is awful, I know many women who have been assaulted. BUT it does not sound like Majors did anything in this case. The phone call to me clinches it pretty good.
From what I hear, it sounds like someone else assaulted her IF that. Like she was out with complete strangers, can she recall everything that happened the night before? How hard would it have been for someone to come back with her, assault her with a drug in her system, and her get those wounds the same way?
Exactly! That definitely sounds reasonable.
Considering there are cameras and a doorman fir his apartment, none of that sounds plausible
Thank you so much for your great coverage as always, I am really wondering what happens next. I am sure if an appeal can filed he will but would his team maybe be allowed to request live coverage? I hope so because this one just feels off right now, I just want to feel like justice is being served no matter the outcome and since there is two courts in play (legal and public) it would be ideal as I think at this point the result is extremely divisive..
Well remember - you'd only see a case retried if a new trial is granted as a result of an appeal. Appeal is for saying the judge, lawyers, or jury did something wrong, or if new evidence has become available that wasn't before.
@@twitchascension fair point I didn't consider that. thanks for the insight.
I disagree with the outcome. It's crazy to me. The events that night show a man trying to get away from a woman. How the finger was injured? Who knows. How she got that scratch on her neck? Who knows. She showed no signs of injury immediately after the incident and even when out at the club.
Bro calls the cops and he ends up charged.
I'm not sure that the prosecution has proved their case. However, I don't think the defense has done a very good job of discrediting the witnesses by asking if they can prove the injuries were the result of abuse not merely the result of a conflict. Or even if the injuries could be the result of an intervening event.
He "couldnt recall" a little too much....
Why didn’t Majors choose to take the stand?
No clear reason tbh
There’s nothing he could have said that the jury didn’t already know and it would risk the prosecution digging something they didn’t want up.
@@sirflappington2484 it helped Johnny Depp in his case
@sheh.9163 Gooood question
@@sheh.9163 It wasn't a criminal case, since the burden of proof is on the prosecution he wouldn't gain much by testifying unless he could offer a completely different set of information backed by evidence.
I cannot lie but I’m beginning to harbour a bit of deep resentment because I think we can all see it’s an attack
It could have been fine by me if he had gotten Harassment, he didn't physically abuse Grace.
Not even harassment she chased him for blocks and text over 30 times.
Interesting Trial. Didn't Majors tell Grace in a text message to not get medical help because he feared he would get blamed for her injuries? If so then that exact thing happened when he called 911 after finding Grace in their closet.
No... that was from 2022 and we don't know what that was about. We do know grace said there was never any violence before this trial case.
Bullshit verdict. anyone that thinks otherwise tosses the salads of homeless drug users.
You're right that at some point in the past, he feared this happening, and you're right that he called 911, and he did get blamed for it.
Ain't that something else.
He has every right to be worried! As clearly… his fear has come true! Shes been a liability.., he knows its… and it was true. Media is on his ass since he got into marvel.. anything will be spun as a bad look!
I feel like I’m missing something. What evidence proves he physically hurt her?
What do you think of the viability of an appeal here given some of the issues with the case (e.g. the detective's testimony not being allowed)?
The defense team failed Majors. If we are going with what happened in the car, the only people in there were Jabari, Majors, and the driver. It’s clear from their collective testimony that Jabari stole his personal property and was angry she saw evidence of Majors texting another woman.
Why didn’t the defense argue Majors was justified in using a reasonable of force to retrieve his personal property? Why didn’t they argue not only was he assaulted but harassed after trying to remove himself from the situation.
The information that is missing for me is whether or not the charges for assault were simply because he placed her in the car and she could have gotten hurt or the incident that may have led to her broken finger and cut behind her ear. If it is the latter that is ridiculous. If you break a bone, it would swell up and become red in less than a hour. You would feel pain and no matter how trained you are to ignore it, you would notice that you were in pain and react to that pain. Partying with strangers, which is very odd and being upset would not change the fact that you would notice if your finger was broken and it would be visible. It is clear she cut her own self behind her ear and fell or bumped into something and broke her own finger. It is clear that those injuries did not come from the incident in the car from the video shown as he did not twist her arm, strangle her or anything else. He was pushing her in to the car and she kept trying to get out the car to follow him, he decided to stop fighting her and when they got out...he didn't smack her, grab her, yell at her....he ran away from her.....he ran and she chased him. She started and kept pursuing this fight. People may have given her the benefit of the doubt because she was cheated on and acting on emotion but does that excuse her behavior? Understandable and excusable are 2 separate things.
The charges for assault were for him breaking her finger and splitting her head.
The charges for harassment were for him forcing her into the car.
People can break their finger and not go to the doctor at all. Doctors can't even do stuff for you for some small bone breaks. You're talking from ignorance.
@@Guenwhyever There was no way to observe either of those actions from the video shown. There was no direct evidence he did those things to her. Also, you can clearly see in the police cam video her head was not split open. Additionally, my statement was about her noticing and reacting to her finger being broken not going to the doctor. You, as usual, rushed to speak and did not read my statement thoroughly. For your reference this is usually what would occur with a broken finger: In some cases, there may still be some range of motion and only dull pain. Fractures are common, and how bad they hurt typically depends on their stability. Usually within the next 5-10 minutes, you will notice swelling and redness. As the swelling continues, the finger will become stiff and difficult to move. You are speaking from a place of ignorance, Guen.
@@Guenwhyever Yeah, none of that makes any sense. There wasn't even an allegation of him splitting her head. She'd didn't have a head injury. Where are you even getting that from?? Also, the assault charge that he was acquitted of was the one related to the injuries she had as the jury didn't find that there was evidence proving that he caused those injuries as there was no camera footage of inside the car in addition to the driver's testimony. They only charged him with reckless assault which stemmed from him placing her back in the car.
Nope, I don't thrink they proved he caused her injuries.
Im still looking for the "bruised neck" in the pictures🤔
How the hell was he found guilty …
Oh the verdict is out? How the fuck. Basically every witness contradicted her story. Not to mention her story didn't make sense to begin with.
There was video contradicting her story.
I dont get it.
American Justice when it comes to being Black bud....
@@BrokenhornKT The victimhood mentality
two words. black man.
@@GetWokeGoBroke69 give a better explanation. i'll wait. you won't, but i'll be waiting.
IG the just just agreed with the cop “oh, a black man, must be dangerous. Who cares that she literally was hitting him and tried to chase him for blocks”.
I have broken a lot of bones. If the issue of doubt is pain, I wouldn't dismiss it on that. Swelling though visible or not and impediment of mobility (especially fingers and toes) always occurs when near a joint. I may have been able to bend a finger or use a hand but it wasn't comfortable and you lose at minimum some range of motion. Your extremity also tends not to close with the others unless conciously done.
Now if the injury was extremely minor maybe not. But I hit my hands with hammers a lot, even then. You don't have a perfect hand.
But from the descriptions alone. I couldn't say how believable anything is. I would assume she was actually injured, the question is how.
and I still don't know enough from this position to have any real idea what happened.
Everyone has a bias with cases like this, you got celebrity fans, people that hate the lesser-known accuser, Marvel fans, the I hate the me-too movement crowd, The judicial system is racist crowd, etc. many had their minds made up before the verdict and will believe any news outlet that supports their bias. I just hope he gets help. and get a better team around him. Those text were disturbing. I doubt he going to jail, maybe pay a fine.
It was just a garbage nonsensical decision. He's not guilty of intent, but he's guilty of recklessness.
So let me get this right, she was allowed to instigate a confrontation in the car, to the point where he had to remove himself from the car. As he was removing himself from the car, she tried to do so as well so she could continue her aggression and instigation, to which he attempted to physically hold her back from his person. Once removed from the car, she continued her aggression as he tried to disengage, to the point where he started to run from her to create space. She gave chase and to the point where he had to push her out of his space and then run in the direction AWAY from her!
And in this, the charges against HER get DROPPED, and he gets charged for being RECKLESS in trying to get away from a clear AGGRESSOR.
What a laugh.
Justice was not served and we all know why..
I really wish this was streamed. If it had I bet the verdict would have been different.
How so?
@@JennyLouLouit wouldn't. The hope could be in that case, that a jury would be receiving public pressure or perspective outside of the prosecution or defense. Something that would interfere with court proceedings.
Public opinion might have been shifted, but the jurors would have still had to rely on what they were being presented in the courtroom itself.
The only other potential difference would be if the jurors felt more intimidated because of the televised nature of a trial, but jurors are also not supposed to be on camera regardless. That could potentially put them in danger.
@@JennyLouLou though, the jury is suppose to stay away from any coverage, everybody knows they don't. And in today's era of reporting, the majority of "journalist" twist the facts around to fit their narrative.
This is an assumption, but a believable one. Look how the mainstream media covered the Depp vs Heard trial. Then look how the internet covered it. If it wasn't for those cameras, Jonny Depp more than likely would have been known as a woman beater.
Marilyn Manson is going through something similar, and people have already written him off cuz of how the mainstream media reports it.
Diddy has been a predator for decades, and cuz of his power, the media would always brush off any scandal (or suspension of a scandal) under the rug.
@@forthesakeoflogic5254 you do realize they don't reveal the identity of the jury.
Also, since I don't wanna repeat myself, read my other reply.
Agreed
No
this should have been a mistrial.
Too much drama in this relationship. ... He should have calmly ended it.
He did, which she basically texted a s-icide text....then it started....
I really appreciate how you approach this not from a standpoint of who's the bad guy, or the liar but just "did they prove their case". I think in all these types of trials it's hard to find truth and we really will never know the full story. Having said that I don't think the prosecution proved their case. Not by a long shot.
You probably shouldn't reference the Paltro expert, while he captured the crowd he was extremely misleading about the level of confidence in one entirely hypothetical reconstruction.
Granted the prosecution should have done a better job with clarifying these things but thet likely would have nullified their own expert as well.
But I guess many experts are like that. I just prefer when they stick to the facts and are clear as to the limits of their analysis.
I am Australian. I think you (US folk) should delete "beyond reasonable doubt" from your legal texts all together. With all the video footage fo GJ partying rather normally all night and then jump to the bodycam footage of GJ being seriously hurt, how is there "no doubt" that the something thing else didn't cause those injuries after the initial car incident? As for JM harrassing GJ, he was at worst defending himself and at best trying to de-escalate by running away! What else is a black man expected to do? Can an expert in DV comment please.
I this case should have never went to trial. I think Johnathan celebrity was his biggest crime
I think the defence screwed up.
❤
They got it wrong.
That's a pickle, i'm not sure out of the courtroom you could build any informed deliberation, unlike other proceedings we saw online. For example, we know her behavior and physiology changed while she was with J.M. The records show an overwhelming ego from the star and a very submissive attitude from the lady. A lot of factor can lead to a degenerate outcome, yes he tried to leave her in the video, but what was the whole story ? She may have lied multiple times to protect him, it's not unheard of and she has that kind of trend. The Jury had the space and exposition of the court to decide.
I don't, and i think not many people do. So, it's a bit of a pickle, and i think that kind of escalation goes both ways.
She didn't act like the 1st Lady, but he's not Obama. At face value, i do agree, but there's no certainty here.
Same thing i have been thinking…. He seems like a jerk in disguise in real life… she seems desparate to be with him… even begged him to come back after altercation… this is tricky… this was just a toxic relationship…
Oh but he definitely is Obama, that's why he was asking her to act like Michelle. Now obviously he's not POTUS but his position and potential called for the same level of decorum.
@@alicedoors4826 well, he compare himself to a President to justify enforcing an attitude on someone. Obviously you think he's a successful character, but from my point of view, he's just a man in a broken relationship. Is he a good person or not i don't know, and you don't know. That's my point. Stardom does not supercedes his humanity or lack of.
@@VinhNPL His lack of humanity because of his stardom doesn't come into this equation at all. You're just clearly misunderstanding his point and running with it.
He didn't directly compare himself to the president he used him to illustrate his position in society and the direction he is heading in.
Also notice how I said "potential", so it's not just about who he is today but who he is striving to become, just like he said in the recording. Whatever you might personally think of him, he did have a very influential position (as a black man, he had a lot of people looking up to him and betting on him) and he has been dropped because someone with his record can't hold an influential position of power like that. Those are the facts, not my opinion, you have no idea what my personal opinions are on his success.
So again absolutely nothing wrong with telling your girl to act classy in public cause you're on a very successful career trajectory and her reckless actions could reflect badly on you. That is not a lack of humanity and nothing to do with stardom. I would imagine a well respected doctor or lawyer also has had these kind of conversations with his potential partner, because he too wants to have good standing in the community. It would be crazy to assume the doctor/lawyer thought they were on the level of POTUS just because they compared their partner to Michelle O to illustrate their point lol. Nothing to do with lack of humanity, more like trying to fix lack of class and decorum.
@@alicedoors4826 i understand your point, but there is still speculations. You' really think there's a political agenda to remove the rising movie star ? I liked the actor, but his career was not yet iconic.His futur maybe, but that's another topic right.
There's a good analysis from Natalie which lead me to think the jury may have taken the text chat has a sign of previous violence and how J.M. may have influenced Grace to lie and be inconsistent. If that's the case, the verdict is not consistent with the charges.
There's a lot of precedent for G.J. behavior in victims of abuse. So that's why i commented. This is a pickle, we don't have the courtroom videos, the depositions, and evidences as they were presented by both sides.
We know the defense made a mistake which may have influenced the jury.
He can still appeal i think, and the case got my interest because i thought he was a good actor in the few things i've seen like "Lovecraft Country" in fact.
But, if he did strangle G.J pushing her into the car; whoever she is and how crazy she can be, this is not the answer.
#justiceforjohnathanmajors
They was no evidence supporting he assaulted her the real question is what did she do they night before where she was blacked out and going to party’s with complete strangers who does that this is definitely a witch hunt
Sounds like a result has come out? I thought after hearing only the initial headlines he might be guilty because why would they pursue it otherwise. The states case seemed insufficient to me, even if he seems like a massive jerk.
Just because they pursue a case doesn't mean the defendant is guilty....
@@JennyLouLou I know, but I thought they’d have a stronger case. Turns out it was apparently strong enough for a couple of the charges. It will be interesting to see if more details come out.
No I don’t think the state has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
The biggest question here in Jonathan case, is Jonathan Majors, use, aggressive force to gain his property, such as he’s phone? Did the law prohibit it one to gain their property back.
I have always been detached from the outcome of this case. It's hard to judge without video. I hate to see a black man lose like this, but apparently, he had a reputation for cruelty before this.
I'm with u on this i don't see where the case has been proven beyond reasonable dount
the fact that the jury has reached the verdict it did is extremely concerning... and alarm bells shud be ringing immediately about a white woman vs black man case. i know ppl don't want to bring the race card but its been shown time and again to be a factor.
the case is at best muddy andbat worst flimsy
To me its merky in my opinion.
This whole situation was just wrong and shouldn't have went to court. If this was Johnathan Majors the welder, gast station attendant, Walmart employee, MacDonalds worker, this wouldn't have been a blip on anyone's radar. He was railroaded because he was a celebrity. She took his phone, chased him and called him 32 times......is that not harassment?
Their were no jury of majors peers.
The state did minimal, its was their reliance once non black male weighted jury that won this.
Was she violated by someone else by being drugged?
What?
@@Kirasfox It's a valid question. When Johnathan Majors returned to his apartment and found her passed out in the closet, she was naked from the waste down. She was out partying for hours with total strangers while he was in another hotel room. It's possible that someone else could have violated her before Majors came back to his apartment and called 911.
None of this matters, the DA attached some frivolous charges that would definitely come back guilty. Basically you're guilty of touching her on camera. Bullcrap charges because the goal was for him to be guilty of anything.
Admitting to breaking something (glass candle) in itself is considered domestic violence.
I just watched all these vids in this playlist and just have to say you're hair is absolutely gorgeous and very distracting.
Her injuries seem consistent with a struggle that happened in the car. A broken finger, bruises/marks on her neck, and cut behind the ear are random injuries that likely wouldn’t have happened after the car incident. Unfortunately the overall circumstances surrounding her injuries match up, and that’s why there was a guilty verdict.
Except for the fact that the Dr that her side called to the stand said that from what she described in the car that "twisting" wasn't what would've caused her finger to break as it was. Add on the fact that the jury was shown pictures after the incident where her finger was not swollen bruised nor discolored it really is baffling.
Did you see the evidence of her using that finger all night?
The question isn't "is it reasonable that he didn't it"
The question is "is it reasonable that he didn't do it"
If it's reasonable that he's innocent, you have to vote NG. Juries are trash.
Who's the victim? Becayse he's accused but he's also actively trying to get away fromnher. She chased him blocks!
@@faustochavez4193 you have to remember that these weren’t charges she brought against him. Police arrived to a scene where a woman has a broken finger, marks on her neck and a deep cut behind her ear and also learn there was an altercation. There’s no way they couldn’t file charges against him, and in this case he’s not the injured party (victim). He also never claimed self-defense, so the jury can’t look at him as a victim in my opinion.
@@sheh.9163 yeah....he didn't claim self defense or that he was authorized to use force to retrieve his phone. I see this as one of those grey area cases. They tried to paint him as the bjg bad manipulation man but then we have to contrast that with him running away and her chasing him. And him calling 911. She knows what went down and her part in it. Sadly the system sees big black man first over tiny white woman. 1 of the guilty charges isn't even a crime. The DA brought him up on charges so low they don't usually go to trial. He's branded a woman abuser for in my opinion exercising his right to self defense and to retain his property. I hope he appeals but if he doesn't the narrative is that he's a woman beater when clearly he didn't beat her. I thought there wasn't enough to convict and that his defense didn't do a good enough job.
Most of the countries in the world don't have juries and I can see why.
Quite sure they'll try to get him for some money in a civil case. That's probably the main reason why she cooperated with the cops and the prosecutor. She get them a charge on him, and then she can move forward to get monetary compensation, especially since her days of spending his money are over. This will make sense when a civil suit comes.
Government need to keep out of peoples relationships. She wanted to be with him and chose to stay, Now his life is all but ruined because of fairly standard dysfunctional relationship stuff
🇺🇸 ⚖️ 🐰 🕳
Grace has no grace. This was a deliberate attempt to besmerch Majors after getting Exed.
I enjoyed Lovecraft Country, mostly from the endowment of J. Majors performance. Albeit a biased opinion; *this verdict is trash*
Another Black History moment. Sad asf.
She has the skin to win.
Usually i love your channel but you've ignored so much evidence its really disappointing. I feel like you've covered this in away you never use to and thats not fact based. Its audience based
How so? I believe she’s covered everything with an un-biased opinion and would like to understand why you don’t believe so
he left out her invitation.
5:19 the fact that psycho tried to make it look like she tried to do herself in, is proof that he called the cops, in the desperate attempt to control the situation. worst comes to worst, he plays the race card, for all the illeterates in the audience to hop on
;3
he keeps saying uhm, because he's reading a prepared statement by his disney reps ahahhaahhahahha wow you people are so pathetic
12:00 this is proof she still helping him. you are helping an abuser you are all garbage