to be honest, it made little sense but I guess there's no time to really strip this down enough to enable the remedial section to grasp what's what first time round. But I would like to add that the previous lecs in this series have been great in this respect!
the topic he is murdering here is the explanation of the failure of categories to capture difference in the highest term (genera) where different genera have nothing in common and are there for simply other but might be related in a paronymous relationship. If he wants to explicate a concept of the univocity of being he should be talking about Spinoza not Thomas Aquinas.
13:37 18:04
to be honest, it made little sense but I guess there's no time to really strip this down enough to enable the remedial section to grasp what's what first time round. But I would like to add that the previous lecs in this series have been great in this respect!
the topic he is murdering here is the explanation of the failure of categories to capture difference in the highest term (genera) where different genera have nothing in common and are there for simply other but might be related in a paronymous relationship. If he wants to explicate a concept of the univocity of being he should be talking about Spinoza not Thomas Aquinas.
nice
Alright? ffs.
what
what
alright
Seriously. Learn how to speak lol.
alright and what together :)
philosophy is dead