To Tell the Truth - Handwriting analyst; PANEL: Dina Merrill, Johnny Carson (Feb 12, 1962)
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2024
- PANEL: Tom Poston, Dina Merrill, Johnny Carson, Peggy Cass
CONTESTANT #1: Dorothy Sara (Handwriting analyst)
CONTESTANT #2: Michael A. Musmanno (Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice and author: "Ten Ways to Die")
CONTESTANT #3: Anne Sidlauskas (National College Coeds Pocket Billiards Champion)
---------------------------
Join our Facebook group for TTTT-- great discussions, photos, etc, and great people! / 718020231652577
To stay up to date with postings, please consider supporting the TTTT channel by subscribing. The TTTT channel will feature all available episodes of the nighttime CBS series that ran from 1956 to 1967, with a new show posted every weekday in original broadcast order. You'll also find a collection of the Bud Collyer-hosted era of "Beat the Clock"! Click here to subscribe:
/ @totellthetruthcbs4220
Great show. Lots of fun
Peggy Cass is my favorite panelist.
Ms. Cass is both funny and warm.
She is my 2nd least favorite, after Poston. With respect
Her voice was a little tough to take...
Strange, she my 2nd least favorite, after Orson Bean.
Peggy was one smart woman. My uncle was her banker, believe it or not. (No, he never spoke about her finances).
Do we know what Johhny was thinking about contestant #3 in game 3? I think we do. He probably went to that cocktail lounge the next day. Where is Kitty? The handwriting expert did a pretty good job on Johnny. Thanks for the video.
Kitty‘s husband passed away two months prior to this show so she’s probably still out grieving. Actually doesn’t return until April 1962.
@@LindaKLee Thanks for the information. I did not know about this.
Join our Facebook group for TTTT-- great discussions, photos, etc, and great people! facebook.com/groups/718020231652577/
To stay up to date with postings, please consider supporting the TTTT channel by subscribing. The TTTT channel will feature all available episodes of the nighttime CBS series that ran from 1956 to 1967, with a new show posted every weekday in original broadcast order. You'll also find a collection of the Bud Collyer-hosted era of "Beat the Clock"! Click here to subscribe:
czcams.com/channels/ZkBUfTQ_tmKAlUV_sQqrTQ.html
Lady #3 in Game #1
Man #3 in Game #2
Lady #1 in Game #3
Please ban this idiot from posting.
Correct title of the book is "Ten Days to Die".
I knew it was #1 in the 3rd round pretty much right away because she looks Eastern European and that last name is Lithuanian. She looks like she could be my relative.
I love this game, and I got a rare clean sweep tonight.
I'm often frustrated, as a musician and composer, whenever the subject is musical, and wish I could ask questions. For example, it irks me that lyricists call themselves songwriters when they know nothing about music. That said, I am in awe of those who craft exquisite and genius lyrics, which I think is more challenging than writing a melody ( I do both). On this show I REALLY wanted to ask, knowing the significance of a trait, can a person actually improve themself by consciously altering aspects of their handwriting? I'd love to hear what the expert had to say!
Tom is actually acting as though these distinguished men are dumb because they never heard of someone Tom thinks they should know. He does this over and over.
In Round 2, contestant #3 has a comb-over, much like DJT.
Ive been trying to tell the truth all my life but after watching this show and seeing how the "liars" are the ones getting rewarded and making the money; i may have to rethink my life's strategey!😊
They all split the money
Go into politics. (That was easy).
Tom Poston was adorable during Game #1, haha!
However, I can't help but feel that the whole enterprise of handwriting "analysis", as it was presented here, sounds very much like a pseudoscience. Honestly, all three contestants sounded like phonies, in the ilk of horoscope writers and fortune tellers, making such wild inferences from such a small writing sample...
Modern forensic handwriting analyses are only used to match samples (e.g., by characterizing writing idiosyncrasies through statistical and stylistic patterns) and detect potential forgeries (e.g., using magnified images to reveal tracing and/or incorrect stroke orders). No serious scientist would dare jump to such far-fetched psychological conclusions as was demonstrated here.
I agree with everything you say. Particularly about today's handwriting analysts.
Ten days not ways
Is Buddy wearing a hair piece !!!!????
Is that Peggy's real hair or a hair wig !!!!????
Budinski , you can't say that on TV !!!!
Judge Musmanno has the Trump hair style.
No Trump has Musmanno's
No djt has the judges hairstyle