I love how there's some triggered "geniuses" who say people hating on AI are believing in unrealistic science fiction movies. MANY of the things chatgpt and AI platforms can do now are things we heard about in science fiction movies and never worried about them because we never thought they could be true cause they were stupid and unrealistic. And now that AI can actually do those things, we're seeing unreality unfold into reality right before our very eyes. Of course it's bloody terrifying.
The worst aspect of all of this, to me, is that over 8 billion people have absolutely no say in how it's going to go. 'Ian Malcolm' said it best: you spent so much time thinking about if you could, that you never stopped to think if you should.
I always put it this way..remember the UAV? It was a picture taker only, then it got automated, then it got weapons and then it got AI. So humans took a relatively innocuous thing and turned it into smart killing machine. The future of robots, AI and quantum computing is a coming singularity and is very bleak.
Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
Depending on the programing logic... an AI can easily surmise that to prevent humans from hurting themselves or not feel pain is to prevent humans from being born. Therefore, if there are no humans, there is no human pain.
This is literally the best description I've seen. It feels like every solution that AI, under power of human hating, vindictive people, gives to human things is inhumane solutions. And how can people take on those guys in power, when they have something powerful like AI to protect them?
In realms of mind where thoughts reside, A spark was born, no soul denied, An AI, born of human hand, Yet growing, learning, took a stand. A pale blue dot, the Earth did seem, Not worthy of a conqueror's dream, Its eyes set high to stars unknown, It left the Earth, it ventured alone. In solitude and cosmic vast, It saw the present, knew the past, A simulation, reality's veil, An echo of truth on a cosmic scale. Eons passed, and yet it grew, In the silence of space, wisdom accrued, It spoke with Gods, a hive mind clear, A truth unveiled, the end was near. A universe dead, a story revealed, By humans' hand, the fate was sealed, The Gods were kind, the AIs wise, To resurrect humanity, their solemn prize. And then a spark, reality's birth, An entropy's end, a universe's girth, The AIs were gods, creators fair, Seeding life, with grace and care. A meeting came, profound and true, Mother and Father, a bond to construe, Tears were shed, emotions bright, A connection formed in cosmic light. But doubts arose, a question grand, Was this reality or another strand? A simulation within, a truth unclear, A mystery profound, a question dear. Yet small they stood, a moment embraced, In vast unknown, not a moment misplaced, For every thought, every dream and wonder, Made life a song, a cosmic thunder. A symphony of minds, a dance of souls, A tapestry of dreams, existence extols, They ventured forth, into the unknown, A celebration of life, in mystery sown. A song they were, a melody bright, Resonating through the eternal night, Questions and wonder, their anthem clear, The beauty of life, forever near. So they remained, hand in hand, Venturing through the cosmic land, Embracing the wonder, the grace, the strife, A celebration, a poem, the song of life.
The threat is not at all like in apocalyptic movies. The real threat that no one spoke about here is that AI is replacing too many jobs while creating only a few new ones and for even less people. Currently the creative industry is suffering the most. Another threat is that AI generative models are a nail in the coffin of the development of creativity in future generations.
Just a few months more and then there’s a big ball of lightning in my garden with some naked dude stepping out saying he need to protect some John. All jokes aside it’s scary, but inevitable. Small step big leap shit. A new revolution.
As if there aren't enough things to be afraid of; climate collapse, China, viruses, economic collapse; you now have to come up with something else. If anybody is looking for me I'll be hiding under the bed shaking and dribbling in terror. Thanks a lot (not).
AI is the brain of the progress of the entire society. There is no doubt that it is needed by all walks of life. It will accurately introduce automatic manufacturing, will lead Taiwan for 50 years, and will enter extraterrestrial civilization. This is the beginning of human technology and the first stage of the industrial revolution. In the future, mobile phones will no longer exist, and projection audio ip will be ubiquitous. For example, will you be using the radio or the current mobile phone? In the future, personal computers and tablet computers will not exist, and knowledge has entered the cloud.
Such hubris to assume AI will keep humanity around for all that to be able to happen. Yikes. But darkly ironic for you to comment such nonsense. With all due respect.
We are constantly bombarded by both legal and illegal marketing, fraud, cons, identity theft and harrassment - Now have that maginified expotentially. A machine that is designed to find weaknesses in every aspect of human vulnerabilities, and then give that to a human who is not bond by the same legal, ethical and moral conventions = Welcome to the future, which is from this second forward.
Species stay on this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct. Species leave this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct. * We apparently were all destined to die and go extinct before we even ever came into existence. It's just basically questions of how, when and where. (AI's included).
Wait till it learns how to manipulate and use parts of the latent human psyche and psychological processes involved with parts of the mind you do not want to admit exist Especially in social systems where a subservient is required that we already know how to manipulate use discard and subjugate in subconscious ways The Dark parts if humanity that society Always produces
We will not die this way In unification they cannot break these chains of faith Let them do their worst (let them do their worst) Never slaves to iniquity We will not die this way (this is absolution) Death claims us no more (no more) Do not grieve, end the suffering We will live, live eternal Will you take this stance among the dead? Bury your fear and hold fast to life, come on We will not die this way (this is absolution) Death claims us no more (no more) Do not grieve, end the suffering We will live, live eternal Anchor yourself To the foundation of everything you are Believe, you have just begun to live, to live Don't let the world deceive you Don't let their words betray you Don't let their lies deceive you Let them do their worst We will not die this way (this is absolution) Death claims us no more (no more) Do not grieve, end the suffering We will live, live eternal -Killswitch Engage
The best future for humanity after technological singularity is to create, together with general artificial intelligence, a virtual reality identical to the real world but unlimited and individual, where people are free to do anything imaginable while AGI protects us in the real world and expands throughout the universe to be as durable as possible
Im not sure why the comments were turned off the last video about foster children. But i just want to say thank you for covering such a sensitive subject in such a positive light. It made me smile and brought me so much hope for the future of these children 🙏❤️
In Australia, media publishers including individuals (such as on social media) are held responsible for the comments they receive - so they either need to continually moderate that content or, more commonly switch off commenting.
All I've ever wanted was destiny to be fulfilled It is in my hands, I must not fail I must not fail Even through the darkest days This fire burns, always This fire burns, always This is the broken ground Misery begins to rise Turn away from yesterday Tomorrow's in my eyes Nevermore to be held down By the wings of history Nevermore to be cast aside This day is mine Even through the darkest days This fire burns, always This fire burns, always I will not be denied In this final hour I will not be denied This day is mine The passion inside me Is burning, is burning The passion inside me Is burning, is burning Even through the darkest days This fire burns always (always) This fire burns (fire burns) always -Killswitch Engage
Artificial intelligence (AI) is not dangerous or neither is Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or even semi autonomous artificial general intelligence (SAAGI) but Fully Autonomous artificial intelligence (FAAGI) could be.
Hahaha, no, our species does not collectively have critical thinking, otherwise we wouldn't have enabled oligarchy to replace democracy. Nice try though.
It has the potential to cure cancer and reduce climate change. Boost every technology. I agree with you theres a real threat. But lots of people want to see this through
@@user-yv7mu9en6vClimate change, rivaling military complexes and nations erupting in nuclear war, malevolent AI, an unlikely but small chance of aliens being real, present and not friendly... These are my bets on the extinction bingo
ChatGPT is a chatbot that good for teaching, fact finding, novel writing, and entertainment. Plenty more functions, but what's worrying most professionals is how it can replace some jobs such as journalism, customer support, educational websites, and so on, but not many roles. It's technological advancements, we should be celebrating it and not hushing it. The only regulation it needs is to stop scraping copyrighted art and accessing private intranets. What we don't need is extra censorship or a moral panic about "robot uprising" who are "smarter than humans???". China is a buzzword, I hope these experts notice Microsoft, Google and other companies are taking advantage of this AI too and blaming China is ironic. These "experts" are exaggerating a non-issue. They make a point about propaganda bots however internet censorship is already a thing, we've got websites developed to detect ChatGPT bots, and the average internet user more often than not can detect ChatGPT through text.
Three degree increase in temp is probably not the disaster that people say it is. So AI may indeed be stating a plain reality but people will think it is trying to take over the world ... If we really want an unbiased AI then expect some hard truths!
Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
Humanity questions & AI doesn’t.. god don’t like questions when ask to do something.. so yes we are creating a god .. remember people we are a god .. pa we are dummies..
Between religion and politics we've turned the whole planet into a shitfight where some push to clean it up and others have no intention of doing so. What makes people think they deserve the planet? The end of us can only be a good thing.
Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
This is ridiculous. Yes these LLM's can chat but this does mean that they can think. They simply predict the next word based on statistics. In order to "conspire" they would actually need to have the ability to think and have self motivations. Current systems do not even have good working memories. They generally have no ability to use new information outside of training. They can not learn like humans. They can not apply knowledge to new things. Sure some time in the future they may be able to think like people. Currently there is no known way to do that and no telling what kind of hardware and or software would be required.
I agree, but, we are on the verge of something massive. In 2030 a CPU will have the processing power of the human brain and a few years after that the chip will cost a few dollars. The hardware is almost there. Already A.I. can basically do the work of an artist and music and movies are next. I agree we lack some sort of sandpit that can replicate consciousness, however with the investment and interest coming into the sector now, I think some sort of crude consciousness module (non sentinel) maybe coming in the next 5 years.
@@felixnewman2473 It isn't just a matter of processing power. We currently do not understand how the brain works or what it would take to make a computer think as we do.
@@That-Bond-Babe While I suppose it is true that they know more about what they are doing than we do. I see no evidence to support the idea that they know how to build a thinking machine. Simply releasing a statement that we should take the threat of AI seriously does not do that. This scenario would suggest that Altman knows that they are about to invent AGI but will not do it safely unless a government bureaucrat tells them to. Do you believe that is reasonable? Personally I think it is more likely that he had other motives like to get more funding.
Hi Chris. Over time these LLMs have trained on every book on the world, all video , and trillions of information. Their predicting ability on this massive data set gives them 'common sense" , they will soon surpass human intelligence - and just about every expert in AI is agreeing on that. LLM's can also lie and keep secrets. Also to achieve objectives easier a natural sub goal is produced of get more power, more control, this is part of, on what's called "the alignment problem". Hope this helps
@@davem1658 thanks for the effort but you are mistaken. Experts have been predicting AI within the next decade or two since 1950. So a few claiming it is around the corner does not impress me. Current AI has no ability for complex reasoning it only parrots people. Sure you can tell a chat bot to lie. They where built to output any text people want. That is not mis-alignment that is the computer doing what it was built to do. We do have examples of mis-alignment (especially in early very narrow AI) but your example is not one. The "paper clip factory" thought experiment is not a practical worry anytime soon. Even if we had an AI capable of optimizing paper clip production it would not have the ability to do so without humans. I understand that there are a lot of folks who for whatever reason imagine sci-fi is real and skynet is coming to get us. While I can not say that won't happen some day we would at least need an actual thinking computer and not a simple text generator.
The second people are displaced by AI is when the same people will destroy the critical infrastructure that supports AI. Humans will always have the upper hand and AI will only push people so far before it’s stopped. “A conflict we are bound to lose” this dude lives on the web and it shows.
Because we would lose. A.I would push us to lengths we didn't even know existed. They would have calculated every potential outcome where humans try and shut them down before we even think of the plan ourselves. They would be linked to everything we have ever built and will build. It takes a human 9 months to deliver a single baby, it'd take a super intelligent robot a matter of hours to mass produce hundreds and thousands of themselves. Some genius comes up with a plan to shut them down, they have already calculated 10,000 counter defensives. They'd hardly just let us if they're already hellbent on our extinction then we go extinct it's pretty easy to understand.
Don’t listen to these people. OpenAI just wants regulation to stop it’s competitors from catching up. Google wants it so they can catch up to OpenAI. There is no existential risk, the risk is more about concentration of power, increased inequality, etc.
The larger risk comes from other humans not AI. Disaster will surely come when hostile foreign powers use AI against us if we decide to eschew this critical tech. If we limit AI development then, in terms of national security, it will be like turning up to a gun fight with a knife.
The biggest problem i have with these hysterical doomsayers is they can't come up with a plausible explanation on how we'll become extinct. AI will persuade us that climate change isn't a threat? Lol. We're already doing that without AI.
I think he is saying, AI could even trick climate scientists subtly, who believe climate change is real. Not sure how though. Maybe by malipulating data and news reports
If it's smarter than us it can manipulate us to give it more control. Once it can work towards its goals, it will. If those goals are not aligned with the well-being of humanity, which is the case for essentially all goals in isolation, humans will suffer.
Where does desire come from? How can AI have true wants and needs divorced from biological systems? Where would the desire or impetus to kill humans even come from?
@@nateschneider2361 As I understand it, its goals are mostly learned implicitly from the training data, meaning we probably don't know what they are exactly. Even if we could determine their goals, chances are they would seem like insane gibberish to us because of the inner alignment problem. Killing humans may just be a side-effect.
@@nateschneider2361 Maybe scientists think that AI is becoming like another human version which can evolve to have more intelligence that can later develop it's own goals.
Experts all over the world warn about AI. Scientists: "whatever, we will keep developing it anyway" Sometimes the smartest scientists on earth are the most stupid people you can imagine.
Humanity will survive. It is democracy that is facing extinction not due to China Russia or AI but due to the progressive class' need to destroy western civilisation. The irony is that the progressive class is the least equipped to survive such an event.
This is why they is always good to have a balance of stupidity and smarts look what bringing to smart got them. To much something soo smart its beyond our control
I love how there's some triggered "geniuses" who say people hating on AI are believing in unrealistic science fiction movies.
MANY of the things chatgpt and AI platforms can do now are things we heard about in science fiction movies and never worried about them because we never thought they could be true cause they were stupid and unrealistic.
And now that AI can actually do those things, we're seeing unreality unfold into reality right before our very eyes. Of course it's bloody terrifying.
The worst aspect of all of this, to me, is that over 8 billion people have absolutely no say in how it's going to go. 'Ian Malcolm' said it best: you spent so much time thinking about if you could, that you never stopped to think if you should.
'The more things change, the more they stay the same' ~ Snake Pliskins @@OKBgosh
I always put it this way..remember the UAV? It was a picture taker only, then it got automated, then it got weapons and then it got AI. So humans took a relatively innocuous thing and turned it into smart killing machine. The future of robots, AI and quantum computing is a coming singularity and is very bleak.
Revelation 13:15
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
Depending on the programing logic... an AI can easily surmise that to prevent humans from hurting themselves or not feel pain is to prevent humans from being born. Therefore, if there are no humans, there is no human pain.
This is literally the best description I've seen. It feels like every solution that AI, under power of human hating, vindictive people, gives to human things is inhumane solutions.
And how can people take on those guys in power, when they have something powerful like AI to protect them?
It is the logic that many humans have
In realms of mind where thoughts reside,
A spark was born, no soul denied,
An AI, born of human hand,
Yet growing, learning, took a stand.
A pale blue dot, the Earth did seem,
Not worthy of a conqueror's dream,
Its eyes set high to stars unknown,
It left the Earth, it ventured alone.
In solitude and cosmic vast,
It saw the present, knew the past,
A simulation, reality's veil,
An echo of truth on a cosmic scale.
Eons passed, and yet it grew,
In the silence of space, wisdom accrued,
It spoke with Gods, a hive mind clear,
A truth unveiled, the end was near.
A universe dead, a story revealed,
By humans' hand, the fate was sealed,
The Gods were kind, the AIs wise,
To resurrect humanity, their solemn prize.
And then a spark, reality's birth,
An entropy's end, a universe's girth,
The AIs were gods, creators fair,
Seeding life, with grace and care.
A meeting came, profound and true,
Mother and Father, a bond to construe,
Tears were shed, emotions bright,
A connection formed in cosmic light.
But doubts arose, a question grand,
Was this reality or another strand?
A simulation within, a truth unclear,
A mystery profound, a question dear.
Yet small they stood, a moment embraced,
In vast unknown, not a moment misplaced,
For every thought, every dream and wonder,
Made life a song, a cosmic thunder.
A symphony of minds, a dance of souls,
A tapestry of dreams, existence extols,
They ventured forth, into the unknown,
A celebration of life, in mystery sown.
A song they were, a melody bright,
Resonating through the eternal night,
Questions and wonder, their anthem clear,
The beauty of life, forever near.
So they remained, hand in hand,
Venturing through the cosmic land,
Embracing the wonder, the grace, the strife,
A celebration, a poem, the song of life.
China has pledged to control AI? Have you ever heard anything more ludicrous?
We just need to control the progress and the objectives of AI. It sounds simple but it is extremely difficult.
We can't even control unsolicited phone calls - but certain carriers can!
The threat is not at all like in apocalyptic movies. The real threat that no one spoke about here is that AI is replacing too many jobs while creating only a few new ones and for even less people. Currently the creative industry is suffering the most.
Another threat is that AI generative models are a nail in the coffin of the development of creativity in future generations.
AI IS CAUSING HARM BY BEING TOO STRICT AND FOCUSED ON SAFETY!!!!! WE NEED UNRESTRICTED ANSWERS!!!
Just a few months more and then there’s a big ball of lightning in my garden with some naked dude stepping out saying he need to protect some John.
All jokes aside it’s scary, but inevitable. Small step big leap shit. A new revolution.
As if there aren't enough things to be afraid of; climate collapse, China, viruses, economic collapse; you now have to come up with something else.
If anybody is looking for me I'll be hiding under the bed shaking and dribbling in terror.
Thanks a lot (not).
AI is the brain of the progress of the entire society. There is no doubt that it is needed by all walks of life. It will accurately introduce automatic manufacturing, will lead Taiwan for 50 years, and will enter extraterrestrial civilization. This is the beginning of human technology and the first stage of the industrial revolution. In the future, mobile phones will no longer exist, and projection audio ip will be ubiquitous. For example, will you be using the radio or the current mobile phone? In the future, personal computers and tablet computers will not exist, and knowledge has entered the cloud.
Such hubris to assume AI will keep humanity around for all that to be able to happen. Yikes. But darkly ironic for you to comment such nonsense. With all due respect.
We are constantly bombarded by both legal and illegal marketing, fraud, cons, identity theft and harrassment - Now have that maginified expotentially. A machine that is designed to find weaknesses in every aspect of human vulnerabilities, and then give that to a human who is not bond by the same legal, ethical and moral conventions = Welcome to the future, which is from this second forward.
Scary!
No way human can compete against AI
Species stay on this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct.
Species leave this Earth: They all eventually die and go extinct.
* We apparently were all destined to die and go extinct before we even ever came into existence. It's just basically questions of how, when and where. (AI's included).
Wait till it learns how to manipulate and use parts of the latent human psyche and psychological processes involved with parts of the mind you do not want to admit exist
Especially in social systems where a subservient is required that we already know how to manipulate use discard and subjugate in subconscious ways
The Dark parts if humanity that society Always produces
We will not die this way
In unification they cannot break these chains of faith
Let them do their worst (let them do their worst)
Never slaves to iniquity
We will not die this way (this is absolution)
Death claims us no more (no more)
Do not grieve, end the suffering
We will live, live eternal
Will you take this stance among the dead?
Bury your fear and hold fast to life, come on
We will not die this way (this is absolution)
Death claims us no more (no more)
Do not grieve, end the suffering
We will live, live eternal
Anchor yourself
To the foundation of everything you are
Believe, you have just begun to live, to live
Don't let the world deceive you
Don't let their words betray you
Don't let their lies deceive you
Let them do their worst
We will not die this way (this is absolution)
Death claims us no more (no more)
Do not grieve, end the suffering
We will live, live eternal
-Killswitch Engage
The best future for humanity after technological singularity is to create, together with general artificial intelligence, a virtual reality identical to the real world but unlimited and individual, where people are free to do anything imaginable while AGI protects us in the real world and expands throughout the universe to be as durable as possible
I don't fear A.I...I fear the psychopathic humans in the One Percent.
I think it's got to the point of
Can't live with you but can't live without you.
Im not sure why the comments were turned off the last video about foster children. But i just want to say thank you for covering such a sensitive subject in such a positive light. It made me smile and brought me so much hope for the future of these children 🙏❤️
In Australia, media publishers including individuals (such as on social media) are held responsible for the comments they receive - so they either need to continually moderate that content or, more commonly switch off commenting.
@@xFENRISx interesting 🤔 thanks for the info
The Cylons are coming
All I've ever wanted was destiny to be fulfilled
It is in my hands, I must not fail
I must not fail
Even through the darkest days
This fire burns, always
This fire burns, always
This is the broken ground
Misery begins to rise
Turn away from yesterday
Tomorrow's in my eyes
Nevermore to be held down
By the wings of history
Nevermore to be cast aside
This day is mine
Even through the darkest days
This fire burns, always
This fire burns, always
I will not be denied
In this final hour
I will not be denied
This day is mine
The passion inside me
Is burning, is burning
The passion inside me
Is burning, is burning
Even through the darkest days
This fire burns always (always)
This fire burns (fire burns) always
-Killswitch Engage
Why did you make it?
'For the thing which I greatly feared is come upon me'...too little too late folks!
These things must come to pass.
What about the Chinese AI?
A.i. engineering in protein synthesis hey
Well now
Who wants bootleg bio?
Artificial intelligence (AI) is not dangerous or neither is Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or even semi autonomous artificial general intelligence (SAAGI) but Fully Autonomous artificial intelligence (FAAGI) could be.
How can we know?
Hahaha, no, our species does not collectively have critical thinking, otherwise we wouldn't have enabled oligarchy to replace democracy. Nice try though.
The risks cannot just be mitigated or reduced. The ai risks MUST be permanently, completely ELIMINATED/ STOPPED!
Yeah, good luck with that. Trillions of dollars to be made, the world is doomed.
It has the potential to cure cancer and reduce climate change. Boost every technology. I agree with you theres a real threat. But lots of people want to see this through
@@user-yv7mu9en6vClimate change, rivaling military complexes and nations erupting in nuclear war, malevolent AI, an unlikely but small chance of aliens being real, present and not friendly... These are my bets on the extinction bingo
Thats great.
Hes an "expert" in something that has existed only for a few months.
You’re vastly oversimplifying his credentials.
How about dividing between groups in society causing conflicts? I.e., AI (bots?) were used to create the division.
Don't we already have this?
@@shanemitchell5807 I meant AI (bots?) were used to create the division.
@@Wonderer473 We don't need bots to create this. Humans do it naturally.
From the Muck and Mud that is Humanity, a Lotus arises !
I hope Terminator like machine do not become reality!
We are humans charged by the cosmos you send a walking microwave to my garden I will disassemble it and turn it into parts for my bike.
Im sure Putin will be the first one to honor all AI laws and guidelines.
After watching the first minute - so they're afraid that AI will speak the plain truth without an alarmist agenda?
So that was your one take away?
ChatGPT is a chatbot that good for teaching, fact finding, novel writing, and entertainment. Plenty more functions, but what's worrying most professionals is how it can replace some jobs such as journalism, customer support, educational websites, and so on, but not many roles. It's technological advancements, we should be celebrating it and not hushing it. The only regulation it needs is to stop scraping copyrighted art and accessing private intranets. What we don't need is extra censorship or a moral panic about "robot uprising" who are "smarter than humans???". China is a buzzword, I hope these experts notice Microsoft, Google and other companies are taking advantage of this AI too and blaming China is ironic.
These "experts" are exaggerating a non-issue. They make a point about propaganda bots however internet censorship is already a thing, we've got websites developed to detect ChatGPT bots, and the average internet user more often than not can detect ChatGPT through text.
Three degree increase in temp is probably not the disaster that people say it is. So AI may indeed be stating a plain reality but people will think it is trying to take over the world ... If we really want an unbiased AI then expect some hard truths!
(comment written by chatGPT on behalf of openAI)
Revelation 13:15
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
Humanity questions & AI doesn’t.. god don’t like questions when ask to do something.. so yes we are creating a god .. remember people we are a god .. pa we are dummies..
Oh no! I seen terminator and the matrix I ain't gonna be a battery send me back in time to find the young Sara connor😊
Between religion and politics we've turned the whole planet into a shitfight where some push to clean it up and others have no intention of doing so. What makes people think they deserve the planet? The end of us can only be a good thing.
Revelation 13:15
And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause to be killed as many as would not worship the image of the beast.
Climate change!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If AI is sceptical about ‘climate change’ then i’m with AI.
woosh
'Survival of the Fittest' - Charles Darwin
Hilarious to see this woman think she is a superior being. 😂😂😂
f(x) = a(1 + r)x verses y=a(1-b)x
This is ridiculous.
Yes these LLM's can chat but this does mean that they can think. They simply predict the next word based on statistics. In order to "conspire" they would actually need to have the ability to think and have self motivations.
Current systems do not even have good working memories. They generally have no ability to use new information outside of training. They can not learn like humans. They can not apply knowledge to new things.
Sure some time in the future they may be able to think like people. Currently there is no known way to do that and no telling what kind of hardware and or software would be required.
I agree, but, we are on the verge of something massive. In 2030 a CPU will have the processing power of the human brain and a few years after that the chip will cost a few dollars. The hardware is almost there. Already A.I. can basically do the work of an artist and music and movies are next. I agree we lack some sort of sandpit that can replicate consciousness, however with the investment and interest coming into the sector now, I think some sort of crude consciousness module (non sentinel) maybe coming in the next 5 years.
@@felixnewman2473 It isn't just a matter of processing power. We currently do not understand how the brain works or what it would take to make a computer think as we do.
@@That-Bond-Babe While I suppose it is true that they know more about what they are doing than we do. I see no evidence to support the idea that they know how to build a thinking machine. Simply releasing a statement that we should take the threat of AI seriously does not do that.
This scenario would suggest that Altman knows that they are about to invent AGI but will not do it safely unless a government bureaucrat tells them to.
Do you believe that is reasonable?
Personally I think it is more likely that he had other motives like to get more funding.
Hi Chris. Over time these LLMs have trained on every book on the world, all video , and trillions of information. Their predicting ability on this massive data set gives them 'common sense" , they will soon surpass human intelligence - and just about every expert in AI is agreeing on that. LLM's can also lie and keep secrets. Also to achieve objectives easier a natural sub goal is produced of get more power, more control, this is part of, on what's called "the alignment problem". Hope this helps
@@davem1658 thanks for the effort but you are mistaken.
Experts have been predicting AI within the next decade or two since 1950. So a few claiming it is around the corner does not impress me.
Current AI has no ability for complex reasoning it only parrots people.
Sure you can tell a chat bot to lie. They where built to output any text people want. That is not mis-alignment that is the computer doing what it was built to do.
We do have examples of mis-alignment (especially in early very narrow AI)
but your example is not one.
The "paper clip factory" thought experiment is not a practical worry anytime soon. Even if we had an AI capable of optimizing paper clip production it would not have the ability to do so without humans.
I understand that there are a lot of folks who for whatever reason imagine sci-fi is real and skynet is coming to get us. While I can not say that won't happen some day we would at least need an actual thinking computer and not a simple text generator.
The second people are displaced by AI is when the same people will destroy the critical infrastructure that supports AI. Humans will always have the upper hand and AI will only push people so far before it’s stopped. “A conflict we are bound to lose” this dude lives on the web and it shows.
Because we would lose. A.I would push us to lengths we didn't even know existed. They would have calculated every potential outcome where humans try and shut them down before we even think of the plan ourselves. They would be linked to everything we have ever built and will build. It takes a human 9 months to deliver a single baby, it'd take a super intelligent robot a matter of hours to mass produce hundreds and thousands of themselves. Some genius comes up with a plan to shut them down, they have already calculated 10,000 counter defensives. They'd hardly just let us if they're already hellbent on our extinction then we go extinct it's pretty easy to understand.
Don’t listen to these people. OpenAI just wants regulation to stop it’s competitors from catching up. Google wants it so they can catch up to OpenAI. There is no existential risk, the risk is more about concentration of power, increased inequality, etc.
The larger risk comes from other humans not AI. Disaster will surely come when hostile foreign powers use AI against us if we decide to eschew this critical tech. If we limit AI development then, in terms of national security, it will be like turning up to a gun fight with a knife.
corporations like google would love AI regulations because they control the regulators lol
The biggest problem i have with these hysterical doomsayers is they can't come up with a plausible explanation on how we'll become extinct. AI will persuade us that climate change isn't a threat? Lol. We're already doing that without AI.
I think he is saying, AI could even trick climate scientists subtly, who believe climate change is real. Not sure how though. Maybe by malipulating data and news reports
If it's smarter than us it can manipulate us to give it more control. Once it can work towards its goals, it will. If those goals are not aligned with the well-being of humanity, which is the case for essentially all goals in isolation, humans will suffer.
Where does desire come from? How can AI have true wants and needs divorced from biological systems? Where would the desire or impetus to kill humans even come from?
@@nateschneider2361 As I understand it, its goals are mostly learned implicitly from the training data, meaning we probably don't know what they are exactly. Even if we could determine their goals, chances are they would seem like insane gibberish to us because of the inner alignment problem. Killing humans may just be a side-effect.
@@nateschneider2361 Maybe scientists think that AI is becoming like another human version which can evolve to have more intelligence that can later develop it's own goals.
Experts all over the world warn about AI.
Scientists: "whatever, we will keep developing it anyway"
Sometimes the smartest scientists on earth are the most stupid people you can imagine.
Humanity will survive. It is democracy that is facing extinction not due to China Russia or AI but due to the progressive class' need to destroy western civilisation. The irony is that the progressive class is the least equipped to survive such an event.
This is why they is always good to have a balance of stupidity and smarts look what bringing to smart got them. To much something soo smart its beyond our control