CHELSEA SIGN CAICEDO AND LAVIA!
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 08. 2023
- Chelsea win the transfer race for Caicedo against Liverpool and look like they're signing Lavia as well. How do Chelsea get away with all this spending? Mark Goldbridge reacts to the latest transfer news.
It's Here!!! Listen to the NEW Podcast now. Listen to the New Podcast here Spotify open.spotify.com/episode/6cfq... Apple apple.co/47qjCEg - Sport
This makes Jude Bellingham look like the bargain of the century 😂
Really does. Had Liverpool telling us they had no dollar too. Couldn't afford £115m but bid £111 for a fkn dish washer mate🤣
Hell no
Its insane when you look at what jude has done and looks like vs caicedo
His deal is actually a package of £150m
Liverpool ended up with extra money after the Henderson and Fabinho deal... that's why they went for him.
Chelsea have been after Lavia for longer than Liverpool, actually bid on him in a prior window, and have a former Southampton recruiter Joe Shields on staff as a big proponent of Romeo
Being a Liverpool fan caicedo didn't want to sign for Liverpool and I don't think it would have been a right thing to sign him
Lavia I m angry with Liverpool because they dragged this for way too long it's Liverpool.s fault I really wanted him at Liverpool
You should be absolutely seething with the board! Promised you Bellingham for years, made you all look like mugs at the start of the window saying they couldn't afford it, and now they're bidding £111 million on some kid no one had heard of before last season.
On the plus side, sounds like you're sitting on quite the transfer budget. Wonder if they'll spend it.
@@Wynterking94the Liverpool board have showed their hand now they’ll have no choice but to sign players now
Which is very unlike us, considering our history with fast transfers. Even this season to be honest, as the Mac Allister and Szoboszlai transfers felt very immediate. Something else was happening behind the scenes in my opinion, because we don't usually let transfers drag on this much
Without lavia and caicedo, who's the alternative for liverpool?
@@Anonymous-ts2dt One of the other midfielders we were looking at, potentially? Kone, Thuram etc, though I don't know much in the way of their defensive abilities, so I have no clue if they would currently be the right fit for us, what with us now having Mac Allister and Szoboszlai
We offered for Lavia beginning of last season and ppl thought we were crazy for the amount but now it good business!!! The plan has been laid out and is coming to fruition
It's a complete waste of money
We agreed a deal for £60m about an hour ago. We need Lavia...
@@creators1000 horrible deal, 60 mil for a player not even as good as stephan and with less exp
I belive even city gets some of the money from the 60M deal
These new Chelsea players will all need a season to gel but when they do, they’ll have one hell of a team and a young one at that. I don’t think it’ll happen for at least two seasons though
It’s really impressive how chelsea have cleared house and rebuilding their team for a new era. The same thing happened with city, now Newcastle. Fantastic negotiators and recruitment
chelsea are basically just paying off asking prices lol their player side negotiation is the interesting one, 7 year contracts on mid salaries. I wonder how much are the signing and agent fees
Great business by Chelsea tbh
115 mil for a player that had one good season💀💀
Theythrow bad moneys on bad moneys till they make it right..no self suistainable club can afford such strategy.
Impressive?😂😂
Watch them get liquidated in a decade
Chelsea are in effect taking from the next 7 or 8 years transfer budgets in order to spend massively now. If all the players are successful great, but if not it's very high risk. The players mostly seem to be very good so it'll be interesting to see how it goes.
Yeah this is the thing that people don't seem to get. If Pochitino is a success, then great they've got a base of players on long term contracts, and they won't need too many more additions in future windows. But if he fails and a new manager comes in, that new manager won't have the freedom to have a bottomless pit of funds for a rebuild. It seems to me that they are gambling that this rebuild will be the last for many years, yet they are a club with a culture of short term managerial reigns and success built in honeymoon periods.
Wait till they stick 7th this season
@@legendovbago4716crying already?😂😂
Nah, they'll find new loopholes every season.@@jephbayfield2
yeah its just a much different approach
Chelsea was the first club to bid 50M for Lavia last summer, so he has been on Chelsea's radar for a while
As a Chelsea fan I do feel a bit spoilt but of course I am not going to complain. Top 4 is a must now and at least challenge for some silverware. Caicedo and Enzo in that midfield is fantastic. No more excuses. Let's see if Poch can get the best out of this team.
After spending 800 million combined in previous two seasons even Nottingham wud have finished in top 4
@@Islmicstate1bossmanJesus Christ you troubled person
@@rishabhaniket1952 You dont know what your talking about, Yes we spent alot but we just sold most of last seasons first team including some of the players that make up that "800" million, Dont forget the transfer ban we had a few years back aswell🤷
@@Islmicstate1bossmanare you thick mate
@@Islmicstate1bossmanReece James, Levi Colwill, Noni Madueke, Raheem Sterling, Conor Gallagher, Ben Chilwell, Trevoh Chalobah, Carney Chukwuemeka, Lewis Hall, Mason Burstow. Idk what you are saying but we still have a lot of British power
Eghbali and Todd Boehly have practically done a rebuild in one season and I'm very impressed and excited as Chelsea fan. Deadwood were sold and we got a young team now with a great manager that can develop them into champions.
It only took a BILLION in 2 windows .... GENIUS !!
@@Mohammed-dy6xbjust shows how bad our squad was
Who the hell is Eggbali?
Newcastle should just go out there and spend £1b and stick two fingers up at gutless UEFA
115 mil for a player that had one good season💀💀
Thank you for being honest Mark anybody would love what is happening at Chelsea at their Club. Getting rid of deadwoods and brng new young players who wants to be there .
Thank you for the positivity Mark. I thank God, Boehly, Eghbali, Chelsea FC, Poch and Chelsea Fanbase for making it all happen so good this summer window, couldn't ask for more as a Chelsea fan 💎💙🙏
I've said it before and I'm glad someone said it on social media:
Chelsea, during the 1st Roman/Mourinho era, bought players that their rivals wanted and eventually benched them! It was underhanded but I'll admit, it was effective.
Are they doing it now? I'm not too sure but even if they are, I'm actually not bitter that they're being ruthless...FSG can learn a thing or two about being ruthless to rival clubs.
Yeah like how arsenal wanted mudryk but now Chelsea got him so arsenal are stuck with Martinelli and trossard. Chelsea really showed them who's boss
Chelsea did sell 8 players for around 150m so this season isn't that bad in terms of Chelsea purchases. United have signed 160m worth of players and only sold Elanga for a decent fee and Fred for less than 10m. Sounds like sour grapes to be honest.
Chelsea have spent 900 million in a year, only brought in 150 in transfers, something awfully strange going on at chelsea
150? Its much more than that
We bang 240M from players and we have even more (Chalobah, Lakaka, Ziyech, Odoi still there) big question mark will be Gallagher especially after yesterday performance. Still chelsea would have maybe Maatsen and Cucurela to sell as well - so yeah after those selling it´s easy to avoid ffp...especially when they selling academy products.
Plastic club Chelsea, no shirt sponsor, tiny and dated stadium, no European football. Yeah buy success 👏👏👏
@Ciprful not Maatsen bc he's very good so chelsea won't sell him
chelsea have bought a few that other clubs want, however players such as caicedo and enzo and nkunku, they were all big name players that were chelsea through and through in terms of the rumours surrounding them before
With the prices clubs are paying for CDM now, Casemiro in hindsight was an incredible deal for UTD.
I always thought a 5 year contract was the max you could put on someone’s contract and if they want to keep him longer then they renew later on
Five years is simply the limit for amortisation so Chelsea will feed in £23m per annum.if they buy a bum steer then it will really hit them moving forward.
@@robertnelson3353 5 year is the limit for amortisation starting this year. But it is a UEFA rule and Chelsea are not in UEFA this year so I think we can get passed that.
You're right but No uefa for Chelsea, no uefa rule.
How’s that fair for other teams that basically gives them a minor advantage to improve over others, I’m not saying they can’t sign players for these long term contracts but if they can surely others clubs can too
@@chelsea4life994no that’s wrong any length of contract can be given out but the cost of the transfer fee can only be spread over 5 years now
As a United fan I can see how annoying Chelsea are,yes it’s funny how they are taking caicedo,enzo and lavia from Liverpool but remember they took mudryk from arsenal,disasi from Utd and Newcastle
It was personal with Liverpool because of Caicedo. So I’d say us and United fans are both winners
Liverpool was never in for Enzo and Lavia still isn't done Liverpool are speaking with his agent and his preference is Liverpool
Unfortunately United spending a lot as well but on the wrong players and wrong prices...Chelsea when spend they do not spend on flop anymore.
They didnt take anyone from Liverpool.. Chelsea were playing immature childish games for 8 months not Liverpool.. Liverpool simply said if you wont pay the money we will & then suddenly Chelsea found money that means they could have bought him 8 months ago.. Caicedo is an idiot.. Chelsea didnt want to pay for him until Liverpool wanted him.. I would have went to Liverpool.. But Chelsea certainly didnt take him from Liverpool, Chelsea were looking at him for ages.. Now they are stuck with a team for a decade that they best hope works out.. Using loopholes to get things doesnt usually work out well..
@@Ciprfulmudryk a flop already bro 😂😂
Lavia is signing for Liverpool for 60 not Chelsea
Mason mount might be worst midfield signing among top6 clubs 😂
funny i think he may have suited liverpool better
Nah, Havertz is worse.
Kai Havertz, lol.
@@justicedemocrat9357Deluded 💀, havertz was causing city’s defense every problem possible
@@Lunihans_Owner yet he couldnt finish anything
As a Chelsea fan, that was very fair and balanced, so 👍🏻👍🏻
and wrong
Happy for the Premier League to decide @@davidhorton188
@@davidhorton188You are wrong Dave 😂
@@Leo-dj8pu about what boy ?
Gallagher has a solid football brain, solid technique, good positioning and awareness. He's not as fast as some players is a weakness especially in the DM zone, but overall I think he's underrated. Be interesting to see how his season progresses. Caceido clearly DM zone.
Looks like Lavia is on his way to Liverpool.
Don't blame Caceido preferring London with the large S.American contingent living there and global city feeling. Makes sense.
Lavia is still going to Chelsea
Gallagher is not good enough for Chelsea, he should go to Liverpool
Lavia to Liverpool ? Are u still dreaming ? Fabrizio Romano already confirmed that he chose Chelsea as his next club and Chelsea want to get it done by Tuesday 🤷🏻♂️
Here we go indeed
Chelsea they had the blueprint Claude Makélélé then got Ngolo Kante now Moses Caicedo. Claude Makélélé used to be pillar and genius to weasel himself out of the red card or any card in general.
GGMU
I'd put Michael Essien in the mix there too similar midfielder.
With a new DM comes a new generation of title wins. Here we go
Last 3 Chelsea managers said they have the same problems because they have the same players and look at how they have played since pre season, guess they were right because they look a million times better
It's not often Liverpool mess up a transfer window, When they want someone they go get them. But this has been a shambles. Ceicedo Klopp never wanted. He wanted Lavia and Micky Van der ven. FSG have now lost them both due to their messing around with Ceicedo. Now every team they will deal with will know they are desperate and have atleast £110m to play with. Prices have gone up.
New sporting director , should ve kept michael edwards
Nope lavia coming to liverpool
@@creativejb4007in your fantasies, he already has a medical with Chelsea
@@mariotheraviolieater4718 Liverpool had £60m bid accepted by southampton an hour ago apparently
ur dad booked the medical mate?😂😂@@mariotheraviolieater4718
As a Chelsea fan, I agree that we need to compete for the league. We have no Europe & a quality squad to compete in all competitions. Not a big disappoint if we don't come very close to the league but we must be minimum top 3, top 2 but winning the FA & reaching the EPL final is a MUST!!!
We did try to sign lavia last summer or was it January? We have Joe Shields who worked with him at city and at Southampton working for us and he is pushing that deal. So it's not as simple as goin for another clubs targets...
Imagine this team with a year or two experience playing together 🔥
Chelsea are playing Football Manager after editing the files…
Everyone focuses on the spending and ignore the 250 million profit from selling players. Also they have maxed out amortization with new signings and are no longer paying players high weekly wages as compared to past player wages. Chelsea still have as many as 4-5 more players to sell.
This is very hard for people to understand. Its jealousy at this point
@@commentator88How much did you buy those players u sold? Do you think they came from Chelsea's academy. Chelsea bought them for high price and sold them for cheep with a heavy loss
Evey player you sold you paid double for in the first place ye goon.
@richardboaheng4002 I'm glad you think you understand more than the guys who are running a multi million dollar operation.. but yeah im sure you know more than them
Chelsea have lost £260m in the last 2 years. So they'll have to make a profit this year of about £150m to comply with FFP. Clearly not going to happen this year or any other year.
Imagine a midfield of Enzo and Caicedo if they find their form Chelsea are looking dangerous
indeed it is dangerous
The brothers of destruction undertaker (enzo) Kane (caicedo) let us cook 😂
Lol 😂average at best
Still destroyed by The Arsenal. Even Enzo look like a garbage in the Emirates last season😂. Wait until you see Man City midfielder kill those two.
Imagine a midfield of Rice and Odegaard.
you not just a Man united fan but a football fan and thts why your videos is so exciting to watch. congrats dude
Part of the problem is also that certain players don't want to come up north and want the London lifestyle! It's not a new thing but maybe more common these days
Chelsea sold a ton of players. They can replace them It's not breaking rules
You lot sold those players through dodgy Saudi deals that have been extremely elusive.
@Teelee97 you are acting like chelsea are the only team to sell to Saudi....Liverpool, Milan, Madrid, napoli shall I go on?
900M bought for 200M sold loool
@HavokRm I don't think you understand budgets, pfp and how clubs are ran :)
@kieranduchayla6657 all i know if chelsea doesnt get at least top 4 after all this, gonna be the biggest joke of the EPL era ahaha
As a United fan, there is nothing wrong with what Chelsea is doing. I can only wish United take the Chelsea, Man City approach in the near future.
United spend the same amount slowly, stupidly, and cheaply combined with criminal mismanagement.
The hate for clubs spending money is stupid and out of sheer jealousy. City and Chelsea are just doing a better job getting their top priorities. Well done to them!!!
best comment , as i say in my views football is a way of making money and to gain money u need to spend it
greedy six mentality
There is a difference in the Chelsea and man city strategy. Chelsea use the long contracts method, which will only hold them back in the future. Man city use the 'we don't care' method, hence their 100+ charges of financial wrongdoing
@@AndyLowe-netMan City hate is eating you up badly. Sorry!!
If we get all our targets (AM/RW - Kudus or Olise, a ST and another midfielder say Lavia), I am expecting a push for the title. Spending is ambitious and achievements must reflect that.
We cannot amortise the transfer over 9 years. Only up to 5. Anyone can give player contracts up to whatever they want, but cannot spread the cost of transfer that much.
I love that we got Caicedo in, but i dont really like that we also signed Lavia. I think that sends the wrong signal to talents like Santos and Cacidei.
You didn’t sign lavia 😂
@Islmicstate1bossman Virgin
@Islmicstate1bossman Virgin repeats the same things all day. Do you ever go outside NPC?
Remember that chelsea sold for a 190 million pound profit before signing both
they had a net spend of 540 million last season...
and spent about £800m so far since January. Your point?
@@TPCDAZ this summer they sold first for a profit then sign Caicedo and Lavia for a 165 million and they still have a 25 million profit this summer, but if you take last season too there is of course a net 600 million loss
@@ivaraasen5592 Of course you take last season too. It's within the same financial period. Thats like saying I spent £500 yesterday but sold something for a pound today so today I'm in profit!. Thats called denial.
@@TPCDAZI think the financial year is July to June. That's why they sold till june and singed 1 but singed a lot of players after June 30 in a new financial year. Then they will have a new year to balance the expenses.
"A bit like vaping" that one got me. Lol
Yet again Mark balanced and informative.
Caicedo was not an original target of Liverpools so im fine as its only last 2 weeks weve tried. Lavia so promising but was just potential. Hence why Liverpool didn't want to pay up. Hes 19 and cant start every game plus isnt great at certain things. Theres other targets out there
Finally a sensible comment. 😎👍
Major coping
Name one😂😂😂just accept your club has no pull😂😂
@@ohmyfungus5810like bro the coping mechanism is hilarious
Please I wanna know who the other targets are?
I have no idea how they can keep just spending money without breaking FFP
You do know about player sales right
They’ve basically gone all in on this amortisation system so they need to keep selling high and making champions league or they will break ffp soon
Chelsea found a loophole and have exploited it.
By exploiting loopholes, but it will come back to bite them because you can't spend over 800million in just over a year and not be investigated.
They say if you can't beat them join them, we loopholes FC
I am a City fan but i think Mark Goldbridge is the Iniesta of punditry 😂 how do people survive a day without this man's content
I agree with everything except the striker thing, if you follow chelsea you see in the past we bought what we thought top class strikers but they all didn’t work out, morata, lakaka, fernando torres, Shevchenko, kezman, timo they all didn’t work except king drogba, now we have a little bit of a unknown who looked up at drogba and reminds me of him and he looks amazing so I have my hopes up for this one. 🤞🏼
Caicedo, Lavia, Enzo Fernandez! What a midfield
All defensive midfielders who is going to create the goals. Same as last season.
So your club playing with 7 defenders now? No wonder this club looks so struggled to make a single goal😂
@@thescallytraderEnzo ain’t a defensive midfielder at all
@@TomC8042 - Yes, thats exactly what he is.
@@TomC8042 he is literally a defensive minded midfielder. chelsea is literally just throwing money everywhere and dpoing so without even getting what the team actually needs in a prolific goalscorer and a creative midfilder like that of bruno or odegaard or kdb
Liverpools net spend this summer is 60 million pound last summer it was 28 million and the year before it was -5 million why dosent anyone call out fsg
It’s actually £5million net spent because we sold 55m worth in Fabinho and Hendo.
Good commentary, Mark. Rational and balanced
Danger of 8 year contracts is that a player can earn a fortune and clubs cant get rid if they are crap.
its chelsea, they have no shame to send players to play with the u18s to get rid of them lol
As a Manchester United fan I just wanna say a massive thank you to Chelsea, you really made my week 😂
Yea😂 but it will actually qbe determined tonight 😂
Now if they somehow don't get a dm that will be awesome
You are welcome at this stage we are here for vibes
@@friendlyneighborhood5226they've got over £100m to spend your delusional if you think they won't get a dm they'll likely still get top 4
Sorry don't get it. why?
What Chelsea are doing will may or may not harm them in future in financial terms, but what they are doing to football market by setting very high price for good players with only one good season will definitely harm other premier league clubs.
They are inflating the market which is exactly what PSG did .Now every mid table teams will demand 70+ mil for their players whom they don't want to sell.
for their players whom they don't want to sell.
They ruined the transfer market since 2005 before the FFP, nothing new, same mentality. Even the FFP born because of them.
Selling clubs also bear responsibility for pushing up prices. In any market it's down to buyers and sellers as well as external factors
Ridiculous to attempt to blame one club for increasing costs of players.
The blame surely rests equally on the greed of the selling clubs too.
IN LIVERPOOL AND KLOPP WE TRUST…. there’s lots of good EXPERIENCE , ATHLETIC AND DESTRUCTIVE holding midfielders from Europe we can buy ( they may not have premiership experience but so is the case with so many players originally from Europe ..) …no need to make a big issue about Caicedo and Lavia… DONT WANT ANY PLAYERS THAT DON’T WANT TO PLAY FOR US… THE TEAM LOOKS GOOD AND UP FOR THE SEASON AHEAD…. YNWA…💯🔥🙌🏽
Although Chelsea have got Caicedo on a 9 year contract the rules have changed to where clubs are only allowed to subsidise transfer fees up to 5 years I believe
this is in UEFA Competitions only. that is UEFA’s FFP rules. Chelsea aren’t in Europe so Chelsea don’t have to worry about UEFA rules until Chelsea are back in Europe. Premier League rules for Amortisation is still unlimited. which changes next season, so Chelsea effectively have the rest of this window and the next one to get around Premier League FFP through amortised deals.
Chelsea are the original 'Financially doped' club. You now have Newcastle, Man City and Chelsea in the same league - this is nothing to do with jealousy.
People should stop saying Chelsea brought in a lot of money from transfers.
150m and freed up wages don't even come close to equating for the incomings. They spent almost a billion in a year or something crazy 🤣. Something strange happening there...
It's amortisation. Just means we won't be able to sign massive players in the following years. Think boehly wants to complete the squad now and let the team cook.
@@israelplayroom FFP works on a 3 year cycle and Chelsea have lost over £260m in the last 2 years. You're screwed.
Mark, you're the best analyst ever I have ever seen. You're not biased and that's great.
'its a bit like vaping' so true and hilarious
Chelsea are bullying liverpool 😂.
Chelsea still won't win anything. Maybe 7th or 8th. No goals in them
Yes, we finished 12th, and STILL we have more pull than REJECTPOOL 🤣🤣🤣
Probably the 8 year £250k a week contract you offered him
Delusional fan
@@hypershane9727100K a week actually.
@@KAISER1691keep crying 😂😂
@@achilles_1118Cry about what exactly?
Literally they haven't learned a thing from last seasons spending spree.
Not a Chelsea fan but Enzo is the best CDM in the league, adding Caicedo frightens me. Having said that it wont be an overnight success and I think 4th is the absolute best they could hope for this season
Chelsea were in for lavia last year… this ain’t just picking it out of thin air.
boehly looks at football manager stats to buy players while never having watched them play, i mean those outside the EPL, its well known
@@HavokRm bohley may not have but the recruitment specialist who has recommended him wanted brought him to city. Took him to Southampton and now wants him at Chelsea for more than a year.
You're linked with pretty much everyone like Arsenal are, so it's no surprise when you eventually go in for one of those linked players
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but this hijacking other club's targets is so frustrating as a Chelsea fan when it's unbelievably untrue. We bid for Lavia last summer and he has been a long term target. We were in for Caicedo first. Chelsea were scouting Mudryk in September last year and about 10+ young elite younger players that we've signed from all around the world, nobody even knows about because they've been scouted by our top scouts.
So how can we be hijacking players that nobody knows about? It's called world class scouting, PLUS forking out the crazy money for the few players that they deem integral. Fernandez, Caicedo and Fofana are the only players above £65m.
Goldridge is green with envy, and is trying to stir up the usual hated towards us with lies and half truths. So easy to see his true intention. Unfortunately, the morons out there, who listen to him, will believe him
"Chelsea were scouting Mudryk in September last year" Mudryk wanted to join Arsenal. His instragram is evidence, and his face when he was unveiled as a Chelsea player LOL.
115 mil for a player that had one good season💀💀
So ngolo kante didn't have one good season at Leicester city, who knew kante till Leicester won the league that year, world class players always come that way
@@Lunihans_Owner 80 mil for a player who has had no good season
You will be shocked how much they are paying their players at lower wages
It is quite mind boggling
Can you explain to me what the point in FFP is then?
Jackson is just that good. Doesn’t matter how well known he is his abilities are elite. We don’t need another striker. Except maybe a backup to him
His finishing doesn’t look great but his pace and run making are top notch.
@@liamwright2510 His finishing is good. Liverpool’s defenders didn’t give him space to do anything
@@liamwright2510his finishing will improve under poch he has all the abilities needed
Enzo caicedo lavia nkunku Conor
That's a midfield that can run any game any day
I think nkunku will be CF or play up top but ye
We’ve been scouting lavia and talking to him for a year and even bid for him last summer. We’ve also been working on the Caicedo deal for 3 months. We aren’t copying other team targets lmao.
Well said.
I'm not jealous, it will be interesting to see how their recruitment will pan out.
I do wonder about FFP and whether the long contracts can hurt them anyway that will be Chelsea's problem. And I thought 8 years was now the longest term you could contract.
I just wonder how this is sustainable in the long run for the health of the game 🤔
Ppl forget the transfer ban, that actually come to play here, as they didn't spend for a season and a half, that helped them a lot.
Plus the sell and let huge wages go
They have so many academy products which helping them to avoid with FFP, as well sellings into arabia are same I guess (payment in one year not amortezination, and FFP is like 3/4 years how you are going with finances so) for chelsea this is first year lol :D
@@The28studioeven with Count Their outgoings They spent Over 700m that's not right and they're still going for Olise, Lavia another striker and Another GK like that's not possible FA, premier league are joke
I thought the Premier League had put a stop to these long contracts?
I think people forget that Chelsea sells whole lot of academy players were the sales are considered pure profit
Why do people think Chelsea have "the financial power" to do this? They dont and now they seem to be in trouble for cooking the books in previous seasons. They can physically write the cheques but these books do not balance. If they don't make top 4 this season they're completely screwed.
it was chelsea that reported the irregularities in there own books from years ago. they arent breaching ffp at all
Cooking the books is about right. They should be on Master Chef. And UEFA should also look at their dodgy shirt sale figures which supposedly eclipse Real Madrid's.
@@SmartCookie2022 ciutching at straws there id say
@@stewart8727 Just cause they reported it doesnt mean its not a breach and doesn't mean they wont be punished for it. They're just hoping they will get some credit for coming forward.
@@b0sH They've already paid the fine, £9m I think not so long ago.
Lavia was a Chelsea target maybe even before Liverpool they literally bid for him before obviously some players we go for r other clubs targets but as u said it could be very good tactics
Oh I'm super bitter aswell, especially after having the 110mil bid accepted, I find when a player rejects playing for LFC/klopp a real bitter pill to swallow.
How are they not breaking FFP rules
Player sales and installments, Is it hard to understand?
Havertz, Mount, Kovacic, Loftus Cheek, Pulisic, Mendy, Koulibaly all sold because of that so Chelsea isn't the first club i would accuse.
FFP have more loopholes than a hedgehogs pillow
Loopholes in FFP that Chelsea found
@@KAISER1691 Learn the FFP rules and the 3 year cycle and how much Chelsea have already lost. Hard to understand?
And let’s not forget Newcastle nearly got relegated two seasons ago, but their investment got them into top 4, the next season
We were interested in Lavia last season and made a bid . It's Liverpool who are following our declared interests not the other way round.
In hindsight I think 8 year deals are win win the players are on low wages so if they don’t come good they can sell them for high money because the wages are not an issue
We have Jackson, Broja and Nkunku at CF and you’re talking about buying a new one when you’ve only seen one game of them
Chelsea don't have an out to out striker.
They won't score enough goals
Yh but Jackson and Broja aren’t established and obviously nkunku is injured. Ideally chelsea sell Lukaku and get an established 9
The only exciting one of these is Jakson.
If you’re spending £100+m on CDMs, I get why people think you’ll probably go and spend £150m on Osimhen, for example
Chelsea looking quite bloody good. They were getting in between liveprool midfield quite easily in the first half.
Not hard when we don't have a DM and had an AM playing in midfield as well as a forward. Before u say Chelsea didn't either they still had 3 box to box midfielders on who have good defensive attributes Liverpool had Mac Alister in DM
Not hard when you have Bloody Gakpo in midfield, dude isnt even a midfielder.
Still couldn't win though.
Chelsea bid for Lavia last season too.
I learned in my finance masters degree that "In any market especially a down-market, be greedy when everybody gets scared and be scared when everybody is greedy"
Don't worry one of them will be on sale next summer after another bad season after spending without proper transfer plans and recruiting.
Thoughts on Chelsea:
1.)it is within the rules, it highlights how great the work is Klopp, Howe, Brighton, Arteta and Co did who all spend but not anywhere near this sum and became better bit by bit. Raises the question how bad Chelsea are at managing the squad, they ,,scout" what others want to buy spend way more than everybody else and still fail!?
2.)If not for the agent what reason would there be to join chelsea as a talent? Chelsea has a horrific record of developing players, they fail, regress or at best stay the same. So of course you can chose money and hope for short term titles (was better in the past) but from a footballing perspective you are more likely to stop becoming better
pochettino will change your second point
@@nickers7409
They have but developing in the academy and in the first team squad are 2 totally different things!? Buying talents and developing them... is the point I made and they are very bad at it
You are right Mark, Chelsea buy players that other clubs want. I call it "catch and kill" in football terms.
With the signings and coach in place , we should easily make top 4 . I also think it’s lazy to say Poch can’t win trophies just because he coached Spurs as though other “winner” managers won a trophy with spurs .
I really really wanna know why Chelsea fans hate boehly sooo much he is literally spending billions in just 1 year. Like what more you want from a new owner?????
No one hates him. But the unstability and choices like replacing Tuchel with Potter didnt hit well with the fans.
It's funny how no one is talking about the money Chelsea raised from player sales this summer
Because it is nowhere near the amount they've spent over the last couple windows
900M spent for 200m brought in lmao not even halfway there. If the buys were lower then of course it would have been interesting.
Not going to cover the massive losses Chelsea FC makes.
According to Redmen TV Liverpool have now agreed fee for Lavia
Only difference with lavia is that chelsea were interested and bid last summer, clearly a target the board wanted
As a Chelsea fan, I don’t agree with the amount we spend it’s absolutely ridiculous. The tactic of buying players other clubs wants is also ridiculous. Good recruitment should be the priority and it’s just staggering if we don’t finish at least 2nd this year then it’s a categorical failure due to the amount spent
LMAO. Sure you are pal. “Buying players other clubs want “. So you would only buy crap players that no club wants? Good players are always wanted by multiple clubs. Your business acclimate is lacking
If you don’t win at least one trophy I’m bullying all of my Chelsea friends. You don’t spend that much and finish anything less than 1st in the prem.
Love the channel mate. I will be pretty disappointed if Liverpool don't bring in anymore players, if we don't get lavia now either, any ideas who could possibly come in for us?
Thanks mate
loserpool
Doucoure
We will sign at least 2. Theres other targets
@@barrysmithhy1583 why are all united fans pr**ks
dont believe mark believw fabrizio
"Chelsea copy other teams targets" forgetting we put a bid in for Lavia LAST summer & Joe Shields has been in regular contact since leaving Southampton as he rates him highly.
As a chelsea fan i love Mark, he speaks nothing but facts! Hes not biased.
I don't think it's jealousy. The idea of Caicado going for 115m. The idea of neymar going to Saudi... These things are making me fall out of love with football
Lol why. Its just money
Blame brighton for the price tag
Great comment, these transfer fees are pathetic, 115 million for a cdm 😂
why do you let the idea of money affect what happens on the pitch, just enjoy the game
Chelsea should also be investigated. Spending over 800million in just over a year must be breaking some kind of FFP rules, even if they are exploiting all the loopholes.
Same thing with them cheating city scum bags but they will do nothing I have never heard of a 9 year contract and how much money do they have 😂😂😂😂😂
They got fine 10million euros
Why, because you say so ?
FFP
I doubt they'll be investigated, they have boehly as owner, if its abromovic then they'd have charges already. English hypocrisy.
All these signings just to finish below Aston Villa.
I'm a huge Chelsea Supporter but I like your channel and Chelsea content. I like how you sneezed after you said Man city lol
It's not just the transfer fees they are paying huge wages as well
Not true. Chelsea have lowered the wages
@@somaliflame2501That is such cap lmao, you're giving out 9 year contracts by definition you're not lowering the wages
The highest earner at our club is Sterling, everyone we signed the last year earns around 100k. So what are you on about?
This is simply not true, we have massively lowered our wage bill.
@@mwgaming5167What does contract length have to do with the wages? Chelsea have lowered the wage structure and don't pay out massive wages as before and also not everyone is signing on 8 year contracts. People are just jealous and speaks without facts.
Ffp is a joke
I think they pay that money in a period of 8 years. 16 odd millions in 8 yrs I believe. Not sure though
@@errank284 they only allow to pay over 5 years only they change the rules you allow to give how ever long contract but paying fee only over 5 years so 20m odd a year
@@jairule8300 5 years only apply for uefa competition teams, chelsea are not in europe so it doesn't apply for them
@@ricjazz8594 Of course it does! The rule was brought in because of Chelsea and applies to any UEFA affiliated club regardless of whether you are playing in Europe this year or not. So much false information being posted its laughable.
@@Petersworld77 no it doesn't, but if Chelsea qualify for European competition next season then adjustments need to be made to meet that criteria, however this season Chelsea can fish out 8 year contracts easily
4:50 well said😂😂😂😂
The funny thing is, Tonali looks twice the player, what a beast!!
There's great DMs all over the world, its not suddenly a massively technical position.
The old rice and peas has really mucked up the market value, largely as he's English.
Glad the new season is back underway.
Man city were the most boring team to watch, as per.
⚽