He was up in the final set in the 1990 Final, then the sleeping pills kicked in. Should have also won the 1991 final. Also had a chance in 1995 but that was too hard against Sampras.
A 11 year old boy wakes up Sunday morning and turns on the TV to watch his favorite cartoon. Then this happened! The first time I watched a tennis game. My favorite 2 players since.
Becker vs Edberg my childhood on tv. How many epic matches. I was a great supporter of Boris but also Stefan was simply amazing. I miss so much that kind of tennis and players.
Unser Bobbele ! Für mich immer noch ein Held. Habe ihn NICHT vergessen. Er hat den Tennis nach Germany gebracht. Schöne Zeit ! Bleib cool...Bobbele...Bleib gesund.
@@mezanine10 Pete has done to Boris what Fed has done to Roddick. Not that I would dare to compare them all. I think Roddick was just a super server in the wrong era. I's just to figure.
Not exactly. Becker should’ve won again the next year, was up a break on Edberg in the 5th set! And strarted thinking about the trophy too soon. An epic match
when i see some coms....show little respect back in the day we played real net tennis. they werent stuck at 3 meters from the baseline!! epic tennis and classy i miss those days
Edberg était fatigué par sa campagne sur Terre battue qui l'avait vue aller en finale de Rolland Garros (après avoir battu Becker en demi finale) sa fatigue l'avais pas empêcher d'aller en finale de Wimbledon même si il perds sèchement contre Becker. Je n'avais jamais vu ce match n'ayant pas la 5 à l'époque. Merci pour la vidéo.
N'importe quoi... Becker n'a joué qu'un match de plus en terre battue cette année la... lorsque becker était à son meilleur, il dominait largement Edberg... l'historique de leurs face à face le prouve largement... les défaites de Becker contre Edberg à wimbledon sont dues à une baisse de régime et aux cachets qu'il prenait pour dormir. Becker était beaucoup plus complet... Edberg c'était service volée et basta
@@marilou20091 non non chere, l'histoire de leur H2H raconte qu'Edberg a remporté 4 de leurs 5 matchs les plus importants, stefan 72 semaines n ° 1 mondial contre seulement 12, et en 1988 et 1990, stefan était largement le meilleur joueur du championnat. , qui a gagné avec 100% de mérite
@@bear-ms3ms Edberg fut un grand numéro 1 mondial, à non point douter,mais il bénéficia des nombreuses blessures de Becker entre fin 90 et durant tte l'année 1991..un boum boum au sommet de sa forme lors de l'USOPEN 91,aurait sans doute atteint la finale, sans pour autant forcément l'emporter obligatoirement face à Edberg, tant ce dernier paraissait hors de portée pour tt le monde..je pense néanmoins que Boris aurait offert une autre résistance face à Stefan, que Jim, proprement laminé par le suédois...fin 90,Becker abandonne en finale de Bercy face à Edberg à 3 partout...Boris venait de battre Stefan deux fois en finale des très importants tournois indoor Sydney et Stockholm (une mémorable raclée pour Stefan devant son public !!)...si Becker bat Edberg à Bercy, il termine numéro 1 mondial de la fin 90....mais bon ,avec des si....un autre fabuleux attaquant me paraissait meilleur qu'Edberg, c'est Michael Stich...mais son mental fut à des années lumières de celui du Suédois
Edberg fatigué de sa campagne parisienne ??c'est une plaisanterie lol...il avait 23 ans,était déjà au top de sa forme....il fut redoudablement efficace face à Mayotte et McEnroe...simplement, il tomba sur un Becker incroyablement déterminé et trop fort pour lui....
The difference between today's tennis and then: French Open final 1989: Baseliner Chang against Serve and Volley of Edberg Wimbeldon final 1989: Serve and volley Becker against Serve and Volley Edberg US Open final 1989: Baseliner Lendl against Serve and Volley Becker Now: Baseliner against Baseliners on every surface.
Edberg is really not in form here. I don’t know if he was nervous or tired but I ve never seen him miss so many easy forehand volleys, especially in the first set.
Becker’s backhand was better than Sampras’s or even Edbergs. Key to this one was how he teed off on the Edberg kicker on the backhand side passing him repeatedly. 👍👍👍
@@luvdasitar bb's backhand better than stefan's? Let's stop smoking the impossible LOL i have been playing tennis for 30 years, and you don't know the difference between a racquet and an iron, LOL Do you send kisses in the stands to your opponent's wife to distract him, when you understand that you won't be able to beat him with conventional means, huge dodger? LOL I'm not swedish patriot, huge genius, LOL go learn to play tennis, huge champion BB'S backhand better than stefan's backhand ....AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH
@@bear-ms3ms To be fair, Becker did have a rasping backhand , but only when it mattered to him mentally. In fact, apart from physical movement, Becker almost had a complete game in terms of serve, volley and ability to hit off both flanks with authority. But he somehow never brought it upon himself to win many "winnable" matches. The fact that he played a bit better than Edberg in Grand Slams till the mid-90s and was still able to challenge the likes of Sampras in ATP Masters titles proves it. But he wasnt the fastest mover, and often seem to "react" to opponent's shots than work up a smarter tactical strategy. Edberg, to my mind, used his technical skills more effectively, namely the serve-volley combo and a generally more effective variation on the backhand. Although his awkward looking forehand was a more 'reliable' shot which he used to topspin and push opponents to the back of the court. It wasnt an offensive weapon though. He also moved much smoother than Becker and was generally a better coordinated player. But Becker underutilized his weaponry, for reasons unknown.
this is how tennis used to be played on Wimbledon and should be played. Fast, net play, risk taking, and always on the edge. Now its like watching Roland Garros. The game is ruined.
To me, it was the best decision ever to slow down the courts and balls. Wimbledon was the most boring Major in the 90s. Just boom boom big serves. No real exciting points. Roland Garros and even more New York were much better. So now you have both serve n volley but also baseline duels in Wimbledon. The organizers knew why the changed the conditions. They are not dumb.
mtklaric, I agree completely. How can people say it was a good thing to slow down these courts? To annihilate so much tradition is just terrible. It's an abomination. As a player who was taught to serve and volley by a man who played Rod Laver, I just want to see the variety in the game. Serve and volley tennis was tennis! You had to be able to get to the net and take the ball out of the air! It's a great art.
@@LinusFeynstein well people have different tastes for sure, one like the beauty of this kind of tennis, others like to see 10 meter high topspins hit 10 meters behind the backline. I prefer this era, for me tennis has never been better than in Wimbledon in this era. Also the WTA had their best rivalry ever with Martina and Steffi in these years. Beautiful era.
People bang on about how Federer and co would destroy Becker etc from the 80's but its such a redundant outlook, because tennis was still evolving, and quickly. Just look at the Becker from 88 to the Becker playing Sampras in Hamburg '96, Becker himself had evolved and his power increased along with racquet technology improvements. Sampras was the best of his generation and Becker just about could match him. When Federer and Nadal came along they then had to match the likes of Sampras, and having started with superior racquet technology to any prior generation, blossomed far quicker than any other generation, so naturally most of today's crop would therefore be able to beat older generations. But to simply state Oh they played so rubbish in those days, Fed would smash them is somewhat childish and lacking in perspective, in my opinion.
@ARKN06 I disagree. Becker had a resurgence in late 95-96. He was much fitter, had a more compact serve, moved better, and hit the ball harder in this period than in his 80s heyday. ncf1 makes a credible point.
The grass was so quick those days and nowadays it's slow as clay. There is no way Federer/Nadal/Djokovic would have beaten Becker in 1989 wimbeldon in that surface if they played him in their prime.
It's not the speed or the low bounce that was the problem is was the unpredictability of the bounce. Also, Federer would most definitely have beaten him.
halffulltome Maybe, but I doubt it. Federer played in the weakest era professional tennis ever had, Becker in one of the strongest. Federer almost never had to face players with variety and shotmaking skills like Becker had. Today, you have basically three or four guys that are good enough to beat the top guys in major tournaments, in Becker's time you had ten or fifteen. That's why all those records and numbers are essentially rather unimpressive: If the general level of play on the tour is so weak, SOMEBODY has to win all those slams, don't you think?
I still think Federer is likely to come out as a winner against Becker in the most of the time. Edberg lost the match but was able to turn the result around in the following year. Was there 10 or 15 guys capable of winning Wimbleodon in 89 I doubted. I can literally count them with 1 hand. Becker 2 time champ r/p in 88, Edberg defending champ, Lendl No,1 at the time. A distance 4th is Mac. Name those 6 or 11 players that you think are genuine contenders for 89 Wimbledon.
Today's racquets and strings create more top spin so it's easy to produce passing shots. But the main reason is WB changed the grass and surface became much slower. So, 2001s was Sampras x Ivanizevic, two serve-volleyrs and next year, Nalbadian x Hewitt two baseliners...Carpet surfaces were also very fast but we're banned from professional tour. They standardized the surfaces speed, so the player's style became standardized as well...
Becker contrairement à 1988,avait pris cette très au sérieux..résultat, un Edberg totalement démuni face à un Becker au sommet de son art,pourtant sérieusement inquiété par un remarquable Lendl....
@ le lion des cavernes Stefan en 1988 était largement le meilleur joueur de wimbledon, boris ou non boris. Comme l'écrivaient les journalistes "stefan jouait comme un ange"
@@bear-ms3ms s'il était largement le meilleur, où était-il avant 1988, quand becker gagnait ses premiers titres, déjà 2 wimbledon au compteur... et où était il après 1990? Becker a fait sept finales. Posez vous les bonnes questions. Edberg était esthétique mais pas le meilleur, loin de là.
@@dalinaddei It was the first time i saw a tennis match played in the 80s. Even somebody born before that who wasn't interested in that era's grass court tennis would've made the same remark if they'd compared it to today's.
Hey, maybe dont give away who won in the description, eh? (For those of us who couldnt remember who won ;D) I was gonna watch all of it too. Thanks for ruining it for me. Merde!
@@911801111801 yeah, on most important matches H2H stefan leads 4-1 on weeks N#1 ATP H2H stefan leads 72-12, but bb won the less important matches, not too bad
I respect these guys, but after watching Federer, Djokovic, and Nadal, the former's playing style is almost like visiting the Stone Age or something...
@@francescapodda6726 Djokovic and Nadal certainly, on those fast courts.McEnroe, Edberg, Cash and Sampras would have beaten them too, just as they kept beating Lendl and Agassi on fast grass.Not sure about Federer though - he's the only player I've seen(been watching since '72) who can play serve-and-volley and baseline tennis equally well.A brilliant player.
I WATCHED THIS MATCH LIVE
If at that time someone had claimed that this was his last title at Wimbledon at the age of 21, nobody would have believed that....
He was up in the final set in the 1990 Final, then the sleeping pills kicked in. Should have also won the 1991 final. Also had a chance in 1995 but that was too hard against Sampras.
A 11 year old boy wakes up Sunday morning and turns on the TV to watch his favorite cartoon. Then this happened! The first time I watched a tennis game. My favorite 2 players since.
Becker vs Edberg my childhood on tv. How many epic matches. I was a great supporter of Boris but also Stefan was simply amazing. I miss so much that kind of tennis and players.
Luka F Djokovic vs Nadal my childhood on tv. :)
Boris was the legend of Wimbeldon, he brought tennis to another dimension with these services at 200km per hour
Becker got in at the right time. In much the same way Hewitt and Roddick did. McEnroe was waning and Sampras hadn't yet arrived.
Good old days of serve and volley....
I love these brilliant tennis players. I was young when I saw these matches, I'm enjoying to see them play.
I'm a big fan of Becker.I like all matches between Becker n Edberg.The both played vs legendary tennis players
Compare Becker‘s bodylanguage to the year later. In this match he knew in advance that he would win it!
Unser Bobbele ! Für mich immer noch ein Held. Habe ihn NICHT vergessen. Er hat den Tennis nach Germany gebracht. Schöne Zeit ! Bleib cool...Bobbele...Bleib gesund.
So many great points. These matches were awesome to watch.
To this day, 35 years later, my computer passwords still have the word becker in them
Beste Zeit meines Lebens... best Time of my life...😯☹️ serve and volley in its perfection... from both players (Hope Right) 😊
Habe in jungen Jahren Tennis gespielt, schaue ich mir jetzt an und dann Chris Evert meine lieblings spielerin
Hard to believe that this was last Becker's Wimbledon win. He was 22.
Sampras happened.
He was 21.
@@mezanine10 Pete has done to Boris what Fed has done to Roddick. Not that I would dare to compare them all. I think Roddick was just a super server in the wrong era. I's just to figure.
@@mezanine10 no Sampras in 1991&1992
Boris was 21 here
Edberg rocked him the following year. 2 of the best.
Not exactly. Becker should’ve won again the next year, was up a break on Edberg in the 5th set! And strarted thinking about the trophy too soon. An epic match
Edberg my absolute favourite.
Edberg was an elegant, sleek superb player. Borg and Edberg: two great Swedish tennis players who played in a completely different way - fascinating.
Both service actions are incredible
Becker hit the heaviest back hand ever.
1:10:13 Best Sidespin Passing Shot From Becker.
War immer ein nettes Duell. 🇩🇪👍👍
Amazing serve and volley display.
My child hood hero Boris Becker❤️
when i see some coms....show little respect
back in the day we played real net tennis. they werent stuck at 3 meters from the baseline!! epic tennis and classy
i miss those days
Becker was my favourite player before Federer.
real tennis. not fake stuff of today
Mac Enroe, Edberg, Sampras...m ont fait rêver... depuis, aucun joueur ne me fait rêver
1989 Beckers best Year
Edberg était fatigué par sa campagne sur Terre battue qui l'avait vue aller en finale de Rolland Garros (après avoir battu Becker en demi finale) sa fatigue l'avais pas empêcher d'aller en finale de Wimbledon même si il perds sèchement contre Becker. Je n'avais jamais vu ce match n'ayant pas la 5 à l'époque. Merci pour la vidéo.
N'importe quoi... Becker n'a joué qu'un match de plus en terre battue cette année la... lorsque becker était à son meilleur, il dominait largement Edberg... l'historique de leurs face à face le prouve largement... les défaites de Becker contre Edberg à wimbledon sont dues à une baisse de régime et aux cachets qu'il prenait pour dormir. Becker était beaucoup plus complet... Edberg c'était service volée et basta
@@marilou20091 non non chere, l'histoire de leur H2H raconte qu'Edberg a remporté 4 de leurs 5 matchs les plus importants, stefan 72 semaines n ° 1 mondial contre seulement 12, et en 1988 et 1990, stefan était largement le meilleur joueur du championnat. , qui a gagné avec 100% de mérite
@@marilou20091 complètement de votre avis...Becker était plus complet qu'Edberg, bien que se déplaçant un peu moins bien que le suédois...
@@bear-ms3ms Edberg fut un grand numéro 1 mondial, à non point douter,mais il bénéficia des nombreuses blessures de Becker entre fin 90 et durant tte l'année 1991..un boum boum au sommet de sa forme lors de l'USOPEN 91,aurait sans doute atteint la finale, sans pour autant forcément l'emporter obligatoirement face à Edberg, tant ce dernier paraissait hors de portée pour tt le monde..je pense néanmoins que Boris aurait offert une autre résistance face à Stefan, que Jim, proprement laminé par le suédois...fin 90,Becker abandonne en finale de Bercy face à Edberg à 3 partout...Boris venait de battre Stefan deux fois en finale des très importants tournois indoor Sydney et Stockholm (une mémorable raclée pour Stefan devant son public !!)...si Becker bat Edberg à Bercy, il termine numéro 1 mondial de la fin 90....mais bon ,avec des si....un autre fabuleux attaquant me paraissait meilleur qu'Edberg, c'est Michael Stich...mais son mental fut à des années lumières de celui du Suédois
Edberg fatigué de sa campagne parisienne ??c'est une plaisanterie lol...il avait 23 ans,était déjà au top de sa forme....il fut redoudablement efficace face à Mayotte et McEnroe...simplement, il tomba sur un Becker incroyablement déterminé et trop fort pour lui....
The difference between today's tennis and then:
French Open final 1989:
Baseliner Chang against Serve and Volley of Edberg
Wimbeldon final 1989:
Serve and volley Becker against Serve and Volley Edberg
US Open final 1989:
Baseliner Lendl against Serve and Volley Becker
Now:
Baseliner against Baseliners on every surface.
Les ralentis offerts par Findus, c'est juste grandiose :-)
l'ultralibéralisme, les débuts
oui, et koh lanta sponsorisé par william saurin c'est pas mal non plus
Backer was glamour boy of 🎾, great server at that time
Glamour?
Edberg is really not in form here. I don’t know if he was nervous or tired but I ve never seen him miss so many easy forehand volleys, especially in the first set.
He lost 25 times against becker, poor thing is never in form when becker is at his best.
Isn't it amazing that the players only use their towels in the break ? 👍👍. Love to teview this game !
yes, hate thoose fu... towels between points
Becker’s backhand was better than Sampras’s or even Edbergs. Key to this one was how he teed off on the Edberg kicker on the backhand side passing him repeatedly. 👍👍👍
@luvdasitar bb's backhand better than Edberg's backhand? In wich universe? Did you smoke? Go get rats! LOL LOL LOL
bear are you a moron? Clearly have never played tennis or are you a Swedish patriot? Lol
@@luvdasitar bb's backhand better than stefan's? Let's stop smoking the impossible LOL
i have been playing tennis for 30 years, and you don't know the difference between a racquet and an iron, LOL
Do you send kisses in the stands to your opponent's wife to distract him, when you understand that you won't be able to beat him with conventional means, huge dodger? LOL
I'm not swedish patriot, huge genius, LOL
go learn to play tennis, huge champion
BB'S backhand better than stefan's backhand ....AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH AAAH
@@bear-ms3ms To be fair, Becker did have a rasping backhand , but only when it mattered to him mentally. In fact, apart from physical movement, Becker almost had a complete game in terms of serve, volley and ability to hit off both flanks with authority. But he somehow never brought it upon himself to win many "winnable" matches. The fact that he played a bit better than Edberg in Grand Slams till the mid-90s and was still able to challenge the likes of Sampras in ATP Masters titles proves it. But he wasnt the fastest mover, and often seem to "react" to opponent's shots than work up a smarter tactical strategy. Edberg, to my mind, used his technical skills more effectively, namely the serve-volley combo and a generally more effective variation on the backhand. Although his awkward looking forehand was a more 'reliable' shot which he used to topspin and push opponents to the back of the court. It wasnt an offensive weapon though. He also moved much smoother than Becker and was generally a better coordinated player. But Becker underutilized his weaponry, for reasons unknown.
haha la cinq! génial merci!
un logo qu on n oublie pas
this is how tennis used to be played on Wimbledon and should be played. Fast, net play, risk taking, and always on the edge. Now its like watching Roland Garros. The game is ruined.
mtklaric bullshit. It’s not like RG. Nadal got only two titles there.
@@heitord5539 Not Bullshit, he has two wins, 3 finals and another two half finals. With the old grass court how it was until 2003 not possible.
To me, it was the best decision ever to slow down the courts and balls. Wimbledon was the most boring Major in the 90s. Just boom boom big serves. No real exciting points. Roland Garros and even more New York were much better. So now you have both serve n volley but also baseline duels in Wimbledon. The organizers knew why the changed the conditions. They are not dumb.
mtklaric, I agree completely. How can people say it was a good thing to slow down these courts? To annihilate so much tradition is just terrible. It's an abomination. As a player who was taught to serve and volley by a man who played Rod Laver, I just want to see the variety in the game. Serve and volley tennis was tennis! You had to be able to get to the net and take the ball out of the air! It's a great art.
@@LinusFeynstein well people have different tastes for sure, one like the beauty of this kind of tennis, others like to see 10 meter high topspins hit 10 meters behind the backline. I prefer this era, for me tennis has never been better than in Wimbledon in this era. Also the WTA had their best rivalry ever with Martina and Steffi in these years.
Beautiful era.
when you lose in straight sets you are simply outright outplayed!
Technically, you could outscore your opponent by more than 30 points and still lose in straight sets.
Serve & volly, then good step work to net is good for stefan, boris is a good power tennis player and a real risk taker,,,,,
Lendl should have won that year. It was he that left it after him.
I miss my Boom Boom Blue Fila Tennis Bag.
Bom-Bom Becker in grandioso form
People bang on about how Federer and co would destroy Becker etc from the 80's but its such a redundant outlook, because tennis was still evolving, and quickly. Just look at the Becker from 88 to the Becker playing Sampras in Hamburg '96, Becker himself had evolved and his power increased along with racquet technology improvements. Sampras was the best of his generation and Becker just about could match him. When Federer and Nadal came along they then had to match the likes of Sampras, and having started with superior racquet technology to any prior generation, blossomed far quicker than any other generation, so naturally most of today's crop would therefore be able to beat older generations. But to simply state Oh they played so rubbish in those days, Fed would smash them is somewhat childish and lacking in perspective, in my opinion.
Well said.👌
smart comment,,,,,,,,,,,full of knowledge,,,,
@ARKN06 I disagree. Becker had a resurgence in late 95-96. He was much fitter, had a more compact serve, moved better, and hit the ball harder in this period than in his 80s heyday. ncf1 makes a credible point.
This was the last time Wimbledon Centre Court had terracing
@Steven Graham standing room only
Oui qui aurait cru a l'époque que se serait son dernier titre a Wimbledon a seulement 21 ans.
A golden age for tennis, glad I got to see this time.
The grass was so quick those days and nowadays it's slow as clay. There is no way Federer/Nadal/Djokovic would have beaten Becker in 1989 wimbeldon in that surface if they played him in their prime.
Federer would have adapted. Nadal/Djoko probably not but hell even Lendl came close to winning Wimbledon back then.
It's not the speed or the low bounce that was the problem is was the unpredictability of the bounce. Also, Federer would most definitely have beaten him.
True...AGREED
Hard to imagine anyone who could have beaten Becker on a day like that. Maybe McEnroe ´84, or Laver in his prime .. but who knows.
Federer !!!!!!!!!!
+Joni English Not in a lifetime.
fundhund62 You're joking, right? Federer in his prime would have destroyed Becker.
halffulltome Maybe, but I doubt it. Federer played in the weakest era professional tennis ever had, Becker in one of the strongest. Federer almost never had to face players with variety and shotmaking skills like Becker had. Today, you have basically three or four guys that are good enough to beat the top guys in major tournaments, in Becker's time you had ten or fifteen.
That's why all those records and numbers are essentially rather unimpressive: If the general level of play on the tour is so weak, SOMEBODY has to win all those slams, don't you think?
I still think Federer is likely to come out as a winner against Becker in the most of the time. Edberg lost the match but was able to turn the result around in the following year. Was there 10 or 15 guys capable of winning Wimbleodon in 89 I doubted. I can literally count them with 1 hand. Becker 2 time champ r/p in 88, Edberg defending champ, Lendl No,1 at the time. A distance 4th is Mac. Name those 6 or 11 players that you think are genuine contenders for 89 Wimbledon.
And when not playing championship tennis, they play strong safety in the NFL!
Becker love Edberg ❤️ that's why he lost to Swedish player and paved the way for Pat cash purposely
Becker au sommet de son art en 1989
I am Irish, but I think I understand you, and agree.
ouais mais franchement les commentaires de patrick dominguez clairement pro edberg on s'en passerait volontiers! qu'il ferme sa gueule!
Un becker incredibile. ...ricordo
Best part is those first 10 seconds. What is the name of that intro?
It was a great final but not so epic like Borg McEnroe at 5 sets
In that time...many players go to the net when they serve but not today...why???
Because it's impossible. You will lose big time.
@@MrRazorblade999 What do you mean? you can explain more in detail? :)
Today's racquets and strings create more top spin so it's easy to produce passing shots. But the main reason is WB changed the grass and surface became much slower. So, 2001s was Sampras x Ivanizevic, two serve-volleyrs and next year, Nalbadian x Hewitt two baseliners...Carpet surfaces were also very fast but we're banned from professional tour. They standardized the surfaces speed, so the player's style became standardized as well...
Lang ist's her
Game, Set And Jail
Becker!
Dommage que cette vidéo soit quelque peu gâchée par les commentaires totalement amateurs des commentateurs
Et totalement pro Edberg
Phil Collins in the stands?
The last time Bobbele won Wimbledon. He Should have retired and live a normal life after that. Stefanie Graf showed him the way!
He won 3 more majors after this
Les mecs jouent en pull-over!
en débardeur ....
Grande boom boom
Ppl actually volley in this tennis. Wimbledon has become Roland garros version 2.
Joe Maslov exactly bloody right
38:11
Terrific point 💪
I really don’t think these two liked each other
But they are friends today
Becker contrairement à 1988,avait pris cette très au sérieux..résultat, un Edberg totalement démuni face à un Becker au sommet de son art,pourtant sérieusement inquiété par un remarquable Lendl....
@
le lion des cavernes
Stefan en 1988 était largement le meilleur joueur de wimbledon, boris ou non boris. Comme l'écrivaient les journalistes "stefan jouait comme un ange"
@@bear-ms3ms s'il était largement le meilleur, où était-il avant 1988, quand becker gagnait ses premiers titres, déjà 2 wimbledon au compteur... et où était il après 1990? Becker a fait sept finales. Posez vous les bonnes questions. Edberg était esthétique mais pas le meilleur, loin de là.
who got Boris Beckers RACKET ?????????????
WTF why do they run to the net directly after serving ? was it a rule back then !!!!
it's serve and volley strategy. It was very common on grass because it used to be a fast surface. It's not the case anymore.
How old are you?
@@camembertdalembert6323 ah okay I see, i just found it strange comparing it to today's grass court tennis.
@@dalinaddei It was the first time i saw a tennis match played in the 80s. Even somebody born before that who wasn't interested in that era's grass court tennis would've made the same remark if they'd compared it to today's.
This is how tennis should be played - It takes more skill and artistry...
STEFAN EDBERG SMOTHEST VOLLIER, AND WITH AN AMAZING GRIP ..
Edberg the best!!
Sergio Casellato not this match, but loved both of them
The Best Edberg fut totalement écrasé par Boum Boum lol ce jour là
Hey, maybe dont give away who won in the description, eh? (For those of us who couldnt remember who won ;D) I was gonna watch all of it too. Thanks for ruining it for me. Merde!
Boom-Boom to prison?
Could be.
If Edberg won the second set (serving for it, up 40-0) this probably would've been a five-setter.
Nope. It would have been a 4-set match.
Becker's level of play was quite higher on that day than Edberg's.
@@911801111801 Oh yeah, like W 1988 and Nabisco Masters 1989, LOL LO LOL
@@bear-ms3ms Nope. This was the 1989 Wimbledon final, not the 1988 Wimbledon final, or the 1989 Nabisco Masters.
@@911801111801 yeah, on most important matches H2H stefan leads 4-1
on weeks N#1 ATP H2H stefan leads 72-12, but bb won the less important matches, not too bad
1:10:10
la piu' bella partita di boris
2,09,35 min,,,,,,whosthat girl????????
@ ralf norenberg this woman was at this time Becker's girlfriend:
Karen Schulz
Bis der Becker mal aufschlägt, vergehen ja Jahre meine Güte.
trotzdem um Welten schneller als Djokovic oder Nadal
Aber das Warten lohnt sich
BORIS YELTSIN + JAMES BECKER = BORIS BECKER
Slow motion sponsored by Findus- who produced poor quality frozen food
Fack you not show all game 1990 Stefan win
Ohhh La La. Cmon this is Wimbledon. English please!
yes but this is french tv lol
So you think Wimbledon is only broadcasted in english speaking countries? Moron.
Ĺ0
22.12.2016????????????????????? no i dont think so, sorry
Serve and volley was so bored! We are truly living in the best tennis era now
I hate french speech in Wimbledon! Die können die Pappn nicht halten, und fühlen sich toll dabei!
Compared these old players to todays top players, they are like amateurs!
Becker and Edberg would have beaten Nadal and Djokovic every time on those fast courts.I saw them play.
Today's players volley like amateurs. Except Djokovic, whose volleys look more like a beginner's 😂
@@fundhund62 😂😂
Playing and postures like gays or fools
Shut up gay
Look in the mirror and you’ll see a fucking fool, dumbass
So bad and borring tennis...
Du vrai tennis petit blaireau...
Real tennis ass hole....
Its actually really boring, every ralley is the same. This serve and volley is so low to watch
Jan Jäger what compared to boring baseline tennis which is exactly the same, dumbass
@@JanJaegerX It's because you don't know how to play tennis, LOL LOL LOL
@A.T.N.O.It's because you don't know how to play tennis, LOL LOL LOL
I respect these guys, but after watching Federer, Djokovic, and Nadal, the former's playing style is almost like visiting the Stone Age or something...
Becker would destroy all of them
This serve and volley every point is so boring XD
@@francescapodda6726 Djokovic and Nadal certainly, on those fast courts.McEnroe, Edberg, Cash and Sampras would have beaten them too, just as they kept beating Lendl and Agassi on fast grass.Not sure about Federer though - he's the only player I've seen(been watching since '72) who can play serve-and-volley and baseline tennis equally well.A brilliant player.
Becker and Edberg were so much better!
@@JanJaegerX yeah I find it boring too