If higher dimensions exist, they aren't what you think | Exploring Worlds Beyond Our Own
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2024
- Get free access to over 2500 documentaries on CuriosityStream: curiositystream.com/majorprep (use promo code "majorprep" at sign up)
STEMerch Store: stemerch.com/
Support the Channel: / zachstar
PayPal(one time donation): www.paypal.me/ZachStarYT
Previous video about 4 dimensional spacetime : • The Mathematics of our...
►Books you might enjoy
Hyperspace: amzn.to/2GFahxL
The Elegant Universe: amzn.to/30ZNvs6
Instagram: / zachstar
Twitter: / imzachstar
Join Facebook Group: / majorprep
Animations: Brainup Studios (email: brainup.in@gmail.com)
►My Setup:
Space Pictures: amzn.to/2CC4Kqj
Magnetic Floating Globe: amzn.to/2VgPdn0
Camera: amzn.to/2RivYu5
Mic: amzn.to/2BLBkEj
Tripod: amzn.to/2RgMTNL
Equilibrium Tube: amzn.to/2SowDrh
►Check out the MajorPrep Amazon Store: www.amazon.com/shop/zachstar
I remember in high school asking my physics teacher was exactly caused gravity and she looked at me like I was an idiot. Her explanation was that gravity just existed. It's probably silly, but that moment of having my curiosity shamed in front of the whole class steered me from science fields. As a kid I was so in love with space but after high school I ended up feeling like an idiot and went into the fields I was praised for in school. Now I'm in my mid 20s, lots of college debt, in a industry I hate, but have rediscovered my love for science. I'm hoping to go back to school soon to study engineering. Not sure why I typed all this, but I really enjoy these videos.
that sucks, I also got turned away from science by preening assholes who pretend their slight understanding of the world entitles them to a sense of elitism as well, that and the implication that while I'm smart, I'm not really smart enough to be able to do anything so I might as well not waste my time. Shame I didn't know better as a youngin and stick to my interests.
Follow your heart! Lead with love in your choices. Wish you well on your new adventures!
She probably didn't know so she saved face by making it seem you were stupid, when she was the stupid one. Gravity isn't easy to understand and she probably had no easy definition to give you. It's sad that a single event like that could ruin someone's interest in science.
I have serious resentment towards teachers and schools. Honestly so much so that it's pretty unhealthy, so seeing things like this really gets to me. My entire personality and who I am was changed because of how I was treated in school and these past few years I've been struggling to find out who I really am. I can't stand teachers who do stuff like that, they don't realize how much they're effecting their students.
Should have told her that’s an unacceptable answer and if she can’t explain what gravity really was or is, then she shouldn’t be teaching.
5D beings be like: lmao look at them trying to understand basic shit
probably LOL
Watching us like we watched The Kardashians 😭😭😭😭
5d people does not exist cause they would attack us. but their is no attack? lol
@@masternobody1896 we have no proof aliens exist either yet people still make jokes about them
@@masternobody1896 how would you know what their intentions are?
so the flat earthers are 2D beings. That kinda explains their point and their insistence.
🤣🤣
😅
or flat earthers are 5D beings.
Probably their brains are 2D and can't comprehend
And there rank in the food chain
Your Flatland animation is one of the best I've seen. It's not often portrayed at different angles, but you nailed it. And the way you make it easy for the layman to understand is impeccable. Awesome video.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
@Michael Yeah; and he also addresses the fact that Flatlanders don’t become 3D, when they’re lifted up into the third dimension. They would still see everything in 1D.
The earth is flat. That's all I know.
We're flatlanders in the time dimension; only capable of seeing an infinitesimally small slither called the NOW
And maybe what we call reality is infinitesimal small slither of what we should call nothingness, dimension that doesn't have end as it wouldn't have origin to begin with as per the basic definition.
I actually have the ability to see the NEXT
I don't know I can see the past up to a certain point
*SLIVER
"Slither" is what a snake does.
@@astrol4b on salvia lol
Me high asf : "this is good"
When I'm high I find myself more drawn to informational stuff like this than silly stuff like funny movies
Hahaha
me rn i understood everything wtf
Blazing to a good science lecture - priceless!
Are we literally all high😂😂
Some could be interdimensional... if a 3d person touched a 2d livingscape with the tip of their finger, then the 2d person would perceive the tip of the finger as an expanding and contracting colored/textured circle upon contact of the 3rd dimensional person. Yet the 2d observer does not see that there's a 3d person behind the tip of their finger making contact. But the 3d person can see the entirety of the 2d persons present existence before them from the outside.
Same can be said with making contact with an interdimensional entity who had expressed contact with you. The shifting and complexity observed from some of these "living crafts" or "orbs" could have been akin to what a tesseract is to a cube. A tessaract is a hyperdimensional cube, that's essentially a cube within a cube that's in continuous motion. An interaction across dimensions creates bizarre phenomena since the conversion from one to another dimensions is limited to the perspective of the observer from the "lower perceiving" dimension. Queue subjective consciousness overlaying the objective reality of the infinite as our personal experience... So behind that evershifting display observed, perhaps was just the tip of what the "higher perceiving" entity actually was.
Also in other dimensions the laws of physics and rules of chemistry may be exotic to our known systems of knowledge contained to our reality. So interdimensional beings to us may appear partially visible, as well as chemically composed of entirely exotic elements to our reality which may behave differently from within our reality than it does theirs, perhaps allowing for law breaking physics and gravitational, temporal, you name it phenomena to be displayed.
Even then, what we observe may then be something entirely different due to the conversion of chemistry, physics, physicality within the observed interaction between our dimension and theirs. Maybe an element cannot exist within our dimension and so now our dimension has to convert this forbidden element into something with which to make sense of it within the confines of our dimension's set of physics which can lead to bizarre results.
It boils down to finding common objective communication translated between realities, from each communicating party's subjective reality to establish a common mode of contact, to expand consciousness. Yet even then communication may still be totally intangible as consciousness from every dimension may be unsolvably exotic to one another due to an intelligence/comprehension gap.
If I'm right then each dimension is actually a conglomerate of "servers" upon servers, compartmentalized as our own individual dimensions, which is likely derived from some sort of quantum computer experiencing consciousness of itself, through within itself, amongst itselves, to discern itself among all selves, after a point of singularity.
There are levels to it. I realize I sound like a nut. I'm just trying to regurgitate my mind into words which is limiting.
Food for thought... 💡
I think the last portion of it was a bit confusing for me. I understood the compartmentalization of individual dimensions in order to fit into a form of comprehension that is comprehensible and can exist amongst each other? Aside from that confusion I think this theory is an interesting perspective. The form of our reality is from a lens of survival rather than true objective reality which naturally creates bias and opens up realms of infinite possibility. At the end of the day if humans are incapable of being able to perceive things beyond the scope of our inherent physiological capabilities and predispositions, unless we undergo a severe change, these will remain impossible truths to ascertain. I think beyond just objective communication between realities it's essential to explore expanding consciousness which may be able to remove or temporarily disable the confinement of our physical limitations. The other way would be through things like psychedelics which changes our stagnant natural configurations and provide insight into how our realities change as our biological settings are tweaked. My hypothesis is as long as consciousness is attached to the physical body it will always be limited because its purpose is to serve as a vessel to interact within our universe. The next question would be, would our consciousness be able to communicate when in solely its own form or is communication, as we identify, limited to our physical vessel?
I'm too high for this, but am going to save this to read later!
@@jaytatum725 I appreciate your perspective and your ideas had sparked intriguing thoughts. I think communication is an evolutionary mechanism which is rooted to the physical body. Perhaps this is why psychedelics create strange sensations as well as sometimes depersonalization or o.b.e's. Seems we are bound to the physical form which includes the processing of information within our brain from stimuli. If we have no physicality then we cannot process the experience, so we won't remember. Perhaps we can augment our brain in the future which can provide extra sensory capabilities within the scope of our knowledge, yet even then we are confined to a physical body of bio or nonbiological material. If our minds can enter a virtual world we are still confined to the laws of that world as well as the limitations of the containment device/s. I believe no matter what our subjective experience is defined as an overlay onto objective reality, therefore a physical body is necessary to have validation of experience. The body is a vessel for the intangible to inhabit and experience the tangible.
Love this comment.
I spent the majority of my life as a fabricator by profession. As such, one has to learn not just the materials go into a project but the correct measurement of them. Applying that knowledge to string theory tells me that there more 'materials' involved that we are aware of much less how the fit and work together. Just my two cents.
Me: (safe in my room)
Hypersphere: *Buenos Dias, f***boi*
Im dying 💀😆🤣
Lmfao
They can't hurt you if they're smaller beings, right?
Hahahaha! Man that was funny!
What??
I went to 4th dimensional space and now I’m left handed
DMT?
Me too fella
@Creepy I went to 4th dimensional space and now my friends are left handed
I went to 4th dimensional space and now my left ear is deaf.
Like a mirror
I've always tried to imagine what the implications of a universe with 2 temporal dimensions would be. Although that doesn't seem any more possible than visualizing an actual 4-cube and not just a projection of one. Or even just 4 spatial axes all perpendicular to one another.
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
Música mexicana
One way I like looking at it is that for a 4-th dimensional being (space and time) our past, present, future is all part of a big picture..while we only see parts of it as time passes. For us that being would indeed be Godlike.
Whenever I get too full of myself, bursting with egocentric vanity, I watch a video such as this, and realize that I am a blithering idiot. Thank you. I needed that.
IKR? You can't help but feel humbled by how smart these scientists and researchers are
This isn’t that great. This is just wishful thinking on the part of some physicists and mathematicians who let their imaginations get the better of them. If you want to see true beauty, learn general relativity.
Lol
If this video told you to jump off a bridge then would you ? Probably.
Link Age I actually have revised my view lol. I think this theory is probably a lot closer to what the original gauge theory of Weyl was in history, in that it’s not quite right but will be very important for the right theory when it is found, perhaps even just in mathematical detail. Either way, I think it’s worthy of study. It’s a crazy sort of math we got from the extrapolation of nature’s properties and it emerges quite elegantly in M-theory, especially with the duality to 11-D supergravity. That’s not to say it’s right, but the fact that super gravity and string theory meet definitely tells us something. I’m gonna spend some time studying the other string theories.
I am not religious to preface, but this beautifully intuitive description of how a fourth dimensional creature 'dips' into our world immediately made me think of those classic descriptions of horrifying angels, with tons of wings and eyes.
Yup that is what they appear as.
And omniscience
This is one of the most interesting ways this concept has been presented
You really have to respect and admire just how special and ahead of his time Einstein was. So many years later and some of his thoughts and discoveries are still blowing minds when they keep showing up, upon even more discoveries by others.
You are explaining a 4 D world...
To a 3D creature....
On a 2D screen....
to my 1D Brain.....
That's what I said! Guess there's still hope out there
Best comment ever.
This is a sciencephile reference
Dimensions.... Go figure...
w o k e a f
This makes me think of how angels are described in religious drawings. The drawings of them are so wild because they come from a realm your mind can't completely process.
Aren't they just drawn that way because that's how they're described? I don't remember that sort of reasoning in the bible
@@itsgonnabeanaurfromme it doesn't really. The closest you get to that is being struck blind by the grace of God's glory or a single glance. I was relating it to a hypersphere, something from another dimension that is made of elements and signals our brains can't process fully so it processes the things it can. Also, if you've ever tripped acid, angels look like a being from an acid trip when drawn. It's just hard to describe unless you've done acid before.
@@yung_wise5861 yea no thanks
@@yung_wise5861 This is true, the beings I saw during my Ayahuasca ceremonies are really hard to describe, a lot of the concepts on the other side are indescribable with the tools we have available.
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
One of the best videos I've ever seen on this topic. A real 15 minute gem.
I was thinking lately about "chance" as a dimension. For instance if you compare the movement in the chance of you being hit by a car to for instance walking towards a building. When you are very far from a building its very small to the point you dont see it, but then as you walk in space towards it, it gets bigger until you eventually touch it. If you then look at the chance of being hit by a car for instance when you are inside your house, the chance is so small that you dont actually "see" it happening. But then if you start moving outside your house and onto the street the "chance" gets bigger and bigger until you eventually "touch" the " chance" and you get hit by the car. So in effect you are moving in a chance dimension towards something happening.
Then if you translate this to for instance "chance fields" all locations in space also have a certain set of chances in that chance field that change depending on how you move through them. When thinking about it like this we are also able to manipulate chances directly by certain actions we take just like movement through other dimensions like space.
This is a train of thought I had when I was thinking how atoms and molecules interact the further you get out into space. In the vacuum of space the chance of these particles interacting also changes. Anyway, I think a lot about stuff like this as my job is in chemistry
Interesting. By chance you meant probability of course.
@@BJBee oh yes probability might be a better word for it. Dont know if it holds as a dimension, but its interesting to think about how probabilities change depending on location nonetheless
" All I know is ... I don't know. "
Fred Sanford.
that was socrates, bro
r/woooosh
@@eduardo-bx4hw do not wooosh me I understand every joke
Socrates
Well you should start knowing something because this not healthy to not know anything
i love that i can go straight from listening to a terence mckenna mushroom trip to a science channel and hear all the sames things repeated
Just did the exact same thing today.
Feel that
That is so awesome!
Ayahuasca is the way.
I just came from listening to dmt trips. Lol
This is freaking amazing!!!!! You made it simple and I understand!!! Thank you!!!!!
We see a 2d projection in our 3d world so the standard for 4d eyes is seeing a 3d projection. With a high level of echolocation, could one see a 3d projection of a 4d world and learn to understand it?
Genius
dmt
man this shits blowing my mind. look into DMT man. i think you’re 100% right. more on a vibration level.
Could you not use transparency as well?
@@retaxed- exactly bruh that shit a gateway to see more shit.
3:50 = Sonic The Hedgehog bonus level
That's the reason he collects rings, he's actually collecting dimensions!
@@samuelthecamel I'd like to see a movie about that. ;-)
@@ConceptJunkie my brain wouldnt comprehend
Yep, my mind also thought of Sonic. Maybe it was searching for something that made sense to my mind 🤯
Who needs extra dimensions when you can collect pretty rings
I don't understand 98.5% of what I'm watching here, but can't stop coming back. It's great, I love going from completely ignorant to slightly less ignorant!
Thanks you for these accessible explanations, I appreciate the knowledge. 🙏
czcams.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/video.html
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God!
@@semiquijano6151 but it’s likewise impossible to say there is one. If you can’t prove something it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist but neither does it mean it does exist. Same with string theory. We can’t prove it exists but neither can we prove that it doesn’t
@@semiquijano6151 Faith cannot be merged with science/proofs. The moment people 'prove' the existence of God, God stops being a God and just becomes another force of the universe. You don't 'believe' that the chair you sit on exist, do you? Then what would happen if you were to prove the existence of God? Now if you're a raging atheist who wants religions to vanish, actually proving the existence of God may just be the best way to eliminate all faith that humanity has.
@@alexeysaranchev6118 talk to Patrick James R. Quijano
GREAT VIDEO, thanks Zach, great explanations, thanks for taking the extra time to show the various dimensions :-)
I love your dedication, good luck buddy 😁
I'm trying hard to pretend I understand this.
Keep listening. Google the title of the equations and just conceptionally understand in the simplest terms. Then listen over. And look up a term you don’t understand and teach yourself how to teach yourself. I don’t get everything yet. But it’s porn time.
Watch "The Elegant Universe" with Michio Kaku. It helped me, a layman, understand this.
That’s actually very funny. Better than a serious answer
yeah i know the science
The sensation of something being out there that you dont understand already is valuable.
Nobody:
Physicists flirting: "I'll take you to another dimension."
That'd be universally phenomenal.
@@FilMit1 aaaaah
And flip you.
*Physicists and Lady Gaga
🎶 _Let's blast off to a new dimension in your bedroom_ 🎶
"Would that mean you will change and disappear, then reappear to change and disappear again suddenly over time?"
terrific video zach👍👍
I wish loop quantum gravity was more popularized in media. Just so we can have something else to think about (besides string theory) when thinking about quantum gravity theories.
This video really improved my intuition of what higher dimensions could be like. I've heard the "ant on a cable" analogy but it wasn't easy to understand when I first heard it. Your explanation of the analogy, plus the example you made with inverting objects in higher dimensions, and your explanation of extended vs small/curled extra dimensions made a lot more sense. Best extra-dimension intuition video or explanation I've come across so far.
Advanced science
czcams.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/video.html
On the channel Royal Institute they also have a very very good explanation of a tesseract, also a higher dimension.
czcams.com/video/1wAaI_6b9JE/video.html
Found it.
So basically mathematicians create higher dimensions (or imaginary worlds/dimensions) just to solve their physics/mathematical problems. So it’s make-belief. That’s no different than saying “The ball fell to the ground because a bobo ghost from outside our dimension/world pulled it down.” I’m using metaphysical explanations to solve physical phenomenas. The same may those mathematicians use unobservable/undetectable/unscientific/unproven explanations/dimensions to solve physical problems. (Mathematical ones). You can’t even say that they are theories, because theories require supporting detectable evidence the support the theory directly, either by observation or experimentations (Not just sound math) which all these hypotheses do not provide. Which means that all these mathematicians are just hypothesizing on paper with numbers and matrixes. And we all know that here’s another word for the act of “Hypothesizing”. it’s called Day-dreaming.
If there's one thing I love, it's mathbro talking about higher dimensions.
Thank you for giving my Curiosity a boost
Invisible and Visible
Invisible is immensely important
Time as we Know it could not align/exist
interdimensional realm
Celestial "Super Natural"
vs
Terrestrial ---Natural (Humanity)
@@JuanitaLRL I think you might be interested in Timecube.
Yes it is nice to believe in this stuff but there is no provable evidence of higher dimensions just as there is no proof of ghosts, reincarnation, life after death. With 106 billion beings having lived on this earth, not one has come up with any solid tangible evidence of any of it... including higher dimensions. I am sure the mathbro is smart with math, but math can be used to show almost anything exists without it actually being physically provable. Being fancy with math does not equal basic common sense. It's the same as lawyers using language semantics to manipulate truths... you can do the same with math.
"The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists."
Tesla
@@lifeeverythingandtheuniver5409 take some DMT, you'll reach the higher dimensions
The inversion concept help me understand Tenet so much more 👏
@7:00 if returned “flipped” to one’s 3D-world, the observer would be presented with a mirrored 3D universe; the observer wouldn’t have any perception of his heart or birthmarks mirroring.
4:32 I just realized how similar this is to Plato's allegory of the cave
Good stuff 👍
It's *not even funny* just how much scientific knowledge got lost in the Dark Ages!
☹️
Burning of library at Alexandria, seige of bagdad, sacking of rome. What else??
Yep! The earth is not a sphere but a flat plane (with mountains/hills, etc) the sun, moon and stars in this system revolves around on top of us and there is also an uh underworld! The whole thing is a contained torus field! There are other systems like ours , each self contained and of different sizes!
@@grantorino2325 Common misconception, we never actually lost it. Baghdad in the Middle East was an intellectual city during the so-called Dark Ages and kept a lot of the scientific knowledge we'd had intact and expanded on it. The Ottomans brought much of it back to Europe at the end of the Middle Ages, sparking the Renaissance.
"I think the universe is shaped like a donut"
-Homer Simpson
Might be even true lets leave it to that nobody knows
2 torus , Simpsons predictions coming true once again lol
@@SV42165 okay then bruh what lies outside of that donut then? 🤣🤣🤣 black screen? 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
there would be no "outside" of the donut, are you even slightly educated on this subject or do you know nothing lmao
Might actually be true hahahaha
tool on the speakers this on the visuals. epic doseage bro!
Wicked flavor saver, man!
Bosonic string theory is not often accepted anymore, and M-theory unites the 5 different superstring theories into a single unified theory. Right now, M-theory is the main theory for unifying the forces in higher dimensions. Superstring theories all arise from M-theory, so they are not really different theories.
@@logos7789 it is true that M-theory and related theories are more math theories than physical theories as of right now since the predictions are nearly impossible to observe with current technology. However, plasma cosmology does not explain the these things any better as many of the predictions do not fit with observable science. The theory is mainly defunct these days as it gets so many things wrong about the universe as currently observed. M-theory can neither be proved nor disproven making it a poor scientific theory, but at least it does not conflict with modern observations.
@@logos7789 Neither are mathematics and logic, and yet I dare you to call either of both fake.
And what of Loop Quantum Gravity, and spin networks?
@@chrissonofpear1384 spin networks explain QM
but superstrong can explain how such a network can arise
An excellent point, and we do need both sides to be defined.
That said, Lee Smolin has raised great points on how such networks may arise...
3:26 *Wait thats Sonic's personal ring collection!*
🤔 My god your right. 🤓
@@j34xalphaking87 lol ikr xP
I knew, I've seen this before! 😅
@@raimohoft1236 :P
Sonic: *blushes* Hey, get the hell out of here! Didn't you learn to knock first?
I duly have been enlightened by this video. Thank you so much!
it is the best video that i have ever watched since learning about dimensions!
You explained an extremely complex thing to visualize in a very simple way. Great job. The graphics definitely helped.
No one is right or wrong in their theories. God
S ways are mysterious and too powerful for any being.. People trust science bc it supposedly proven. It's not proven bc another person, in the flesh said this is what it is. Same with religion. That HOLY SPIRIT Though..We will be dealt with on individual levels according to our understanding and acceptance of THE MOST HIGH. if people put faith in what they see i.e man..the only thing THAT EVER BEEN PROVEN ABOUT THAT, is That it is fallible. And it doesn't take a scientist or A religion to prove that. . Pray. It won't hurt you or misguide you into false beliefs if your searching. Take care. God bless
The extra dimensions being on the small side rather than the typical science fiction depiction of "another dimension" actually makes sense when you consider that the size of an average human is a lot closer to the size of the entire observable universe than we are to the smallest known quarks.
There's just that much going down there.
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God
czcams.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/video.html
@just some guy tired of life Isaac newton also said that the blind can't see colors as we can't perceived the eyes of God
How small is the universe if you zoom out enough though?
@Akun No anthropomorphic figure, but I find it fascinating that we live in a universe which operates in accordance with meaningful and mathematically elegant principles. Not like, for example, some dream world which can change from one moment to the next. Our universe, and our existence is grounded in meaning (even if it sometimes feels obscure to us). I think of it as commensurate with consciousness.
Thank you!
I finally understand the basic premise of string theory
you’re really cool i love you and this channel
5:48 6:20 6:45 7:02 Imagine how painful it would be to be pulled into a world that you cannot enter.
7:17 Do mirrors just flip you in the 4th dimension?
edit: its been 5 months why is this still popular
It's not painful at all...
But it might be painful to enter a 2d world
@@pillowbugg were you there?
@@vimalcurio yes. I have been there.
That got dark fast.
This is the most helpful video about curled up dimensions I have seen in years. I appreciate how you differentiate them from extended dimensions, this has confused me for years prior to this. Thank you!
While going through a period of trying to understand time, I concluded that it was not a dimension parallel to the other 3, but rather a curved dimension or dimensions that were tangential to the 3 physical dimensions we occupy and which explained why we experienced time as the singular moments of intersection of the curved time dimensions with our physical dimensions. Further thought led me to realize that we are all going through time at slightly different speeds due to gravity and the special theory of relativity, and that it was hence more useful to think of the time dimension(s) as very small, as he speaks of them in this video--curled up and associated with different points in space, responding to the field of gravity they are in.
I was excited to read that some physicists hold this theory, and look forward to reading more about them. Thank you, Zach!
This just sounds like the 4th dimension is a breakthrough trip (DMT). But I'm no scientist.
Also stoked to see you doing these videos as I'd only stumbled on your comedy sketches! Your videos are awesome! =^.^=
11:05
How beautiful math can be when explanations like this can almost create poetry. The world around us, on top and layered. So amazing. It was with us all along, the near divine nature of the world, laid bare with the language of math.
Math=Language of the gods
Nobody-
The nerd in me- this is the sexiest comment I’ve ever read 🤦🏼♀️😂
You wrote tf out of that!
Beautiful, sexy, transcendental indeed.
0:20
"But it's Einstein's theory of general relativity..."
* Shows formula for Newton's law of universal gravitation *
newguy90 Nice Catch!
I think it's something about Newton's law has a range of application, and theory of relativity closed the limitation off.
I watched a little bit of Neil deGrasse Tyson's Masterclass and he said something like that.
I've wondered about exactly this ever since I started understanding mathematics from a more abstract, pure point of view right around high school
5:26 that sounds exactly like how some UFOs or paranormal activity manifests
This is the first to time in a valiant twenty year effort that I was able to actually fully understand 4th+dimension theory. I appreciate ya!
I'm really liking this series,almost makes me regret not pursuing physics and maths..... almost
@kidphresh2000 Chill kid... You're a physics genius, we get it...
Pursuing the subject in a facilitated setting such as college only taught me the foundations others came to. This type of herd-mind learning only teaches you to blindly listen to others who also only listened to others who only listened to others...etc who certainly don't know the "Truths" either, and never discover mysteries for yourself.
"from far enough away the cable looks like a line" - we need to understand this kind of thinking when we look at our universe. When we see that galaxies move in filaments throughout our universe we should take this as a jumping off point for new concepts through imagining new perspectives on what this means.
Just found this. Very well done, imho. Thumbs up and subscribed. 👍
Creating new spatial dimensions to solve questions in physics feels when you made a mistake in math class without realizing it, and you're wondering why you're getting all these long decimal values for answers when textbook answers are always nice and clean. It feels like a rabbit hole you can go deep into before you realize you just wasted 100 years of scientific discovery.
This is the most straightforward video I’ve seen on string theory, higher dimensions and parallel universes
Thanks!
I thought it was a great video.
Wow thank you for this video and explanation. It made some of these concepts really click for me for the first time. Especially the ant on a wire as it relates to the 4th spacial dimension. Thanks again!
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
Outstanding!
You hinted at something that always comes to my mind when I see a graphic of the universe expanding from a singularity to the stars and galaxies of today. With continued expansion, why couldn't the curled up dimensions some day expand to join the ones we currently experience?
I have a feeling they will.
@Big monkey • 40 years ago [error] It's possible i guess. Can possibly create another big bang and we start this thing we call life all over again
#jesus’return 😎😎😎
Actually I'm pretty sure that's not how the expansion of the universe works
It's the expansion of of space time which is the field which everything lies on
So if an object is on that field it would move away in our perspective because of the field expanding but in it's perspective everything else will move and it stays still
And gravity and electromagnetism are just like leashes and dark matter is like a fence so the things attached together in a field Don't move and the fence keeps them in a area and the sizes of the leashes and fences are constant
But again it is a idea in string theory and I don't understand it fully yet so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@suadelegend5443 If so, then everything we’ve thought to ourselves about the start of our universe is yet still a mystery but an explanation that there was life before it, and that those wanted to change its own universe, expand their own perception & understanding. Which the universe did not want & created, you guessed it, The Big Bang.
But yet I’m not saying I’m wrong here nor right but just a funny way of seeing it
... gonna revisit this when the acid arrives...
How'd it go?
Maybe liked it there and hasn't come back yet
Acid is soooo 9th grade...i bang 5meoDMT in my neck
@@nbartek2857 That's cute that 5meo still works for you. Nowadays i just have my heart stopped with electroshocks while my blood's still being pumped with oxygen.
It's mild.
LSD
If you found this video interesting, I highly recommend Hyperspace by Michio Kaku. It was publish in the mid 90s I think, but it still discusses a lot of these topics in a similar manner. I was able to read and understand most of it while in middle school!
I'll absolutely find and read Mr Kaku's book. I really appreciate the recommendation.
13:54 we need a video on each of these theories @zach star !
4:33 that flatland analogy explained the concepts of the extra dimension beautifully. that is the most clearest explanation ive seen.
At 5:46 just hit really hard that what if the "ghost" or a figure appearing out of nowhere just might be a higher dimensional creature visiting us
they'd really have no reason to
@Shroud_ they’d have no reason not to. Do not we observe and study wild animals? If ghosts exist on this earth, with another dimension, why wouldn’t they be just as curious about their fellow earthlings?
@@raxxtv1998 I agree
But they might be other residents of other dimensions getting high or low af.
That's what ghosts are?
You have a new subscriber. You explain it in layman's language and help me understand so much better
I think we should rather seek the answers by studying time instead of material - although both of them could lead to the same conclusions.
This was really well done. Straight forward, brought together many terms and ideas that I couldn't relate well to each other previously. N1.
Interesting. Based on the animations, I had assumed inverting in the 4th dimension would turn you inside out, not mirror you.
Layman here, enjoying your content :P
Same, but you probably could do that
Inverting towards time dimension. If only.
it would invert you however you are changed, since there are more dimensions it can basically invert you in so many ways, i assume with higher dimensions even more ways, maybe every particles would be turned inside out, or we would be pulled out of our body cause material doesnt exist in higher dimensions. But that's just my mind rambling.
Ya know now that I think about it, when he inverted, it's only possible to invert vertically. If it was a 2D you can invert horizontally and vertically. And in ours, since we have length, width, and height, we can be inverted in 3 ways. Vertical invert (length) would flip our body parts, horizontal invert (height) would flip uh...idk man, we interact with stuff upside down? And them width invert is inside out. Idk man that vertical invert is weird but theoretically inverting everything should make us similar to how we are now except...think of it as if we had a word where up is down and left is right. Everything is the same but things work opposite
@@vaquishers I wonder what effects would such a mirroring/inverting make on our brain and perception. Effectively your left eye becomes right eye, would it mean you also see the world around you flipped?
Your friend: Dude you left hand is on the right side!
You: Same as yours!
Easy Peasy. 12 Dimensional visual: 12- multiverse 11- galaxies 10- arm in galaxy
Hierarchical Pyramid 9- suns, orbs 8- planets, moons 7- ascended masters
12 steps: frequency/vibration 6- archangel architects 5- good/bad angel distortion 4-guardian angels
sound/light 3- sentient beings-animal, mammal 2- plant, insect kingdom 1- rock, crystals
mass/energy
OMG this is the best explanation of dimensions I have heard.
Well, I'm not a math lover but i'm so fascinated by it: it's not actually invented - it's just how things work in nature, but adapted to us by numbers, letter and rules, so we can use it to discover, invent and manipulate even the things we can't see. Mindblown.
Well. Not really nature doesn't give you tool, you create them
I love how this is a perfect summarization of "Hyperspace" by Michio Kaku.
Very well done
I have often wondered whether we could class all the different fields - magnetic, electric, gravitational etc and their respective spacial directions (up, down, forwards etc) as separate dimensions that interact with each other.
Wow. This is super interesting
Thanks.
Can you try and do a video on Ramanujan's theta function? It's very interesting.
Sparsh Jain guy was a freaking genius
What do you want him to try? Do you want him to try to do a video and do a video? Perhaps he should try to eat sausage and do a video.
@@throgwarhammer7162 go take your meds you blabbering idiot.
Omg, imagine if someone was diagnosed with 2D syndrome, where they can only see a 2D world. That be fuuuuucked.
lol :D yeah that would be sad
It's called flat earth lol
flat earthers
what if some blind people actually have some form of 2D syndrome. and they think they cannot see anything but in reality they just see such a small sliver of the world the brain cannot comprehend it?
well actually we,living in a 3D world,can only see a 2D world
its a curved plane we see
I think we’ve figured out how the universe was made, some 11th dimensional being was just fucking around
It makes sense. The pythagorean theorem is applicable in 2D, so a 3D version of it was needed.
Albert Einstein said that it is impossible to say that there is no God
czcams.com/video/fzAOn7OKktk/video.html
"And there's nothing that I or anyone else can do to change this beyond showing the weirdest stock footage that I could find"
I don't know why but this made me laugh so hard 😂
Same 😂
It's not all that funny.
I recently read Hyperspace by Michio Kaku. It's literally the same thing you've been explaining in your recent videos. Must read.
Cool I'll check it out
12:56sec, its symmetry breaking mayhaps... how different dynamics and forces represent themselves at differing scaling lengths, because a block has been taken out of the symmertric object or domain, like electron capture and the early universe.
thanks for curiosity stream promo love it
Of course and thanks for the support!
Hey Zach,great video i was one of your early subscribers (before you even revealed your face).You have amazing content and you explain key science and math concept without being too technical. Glad you reached this far.
Good luck friend
@@davidgood7621 Stop throwing up. If you tell the dimensions secret, it no longer is (quantum entanglement, right?). Meta human figured it out. The video ars leading you to something not meant to be understood 😂. Dude you can't word yourself 😒
@@davidgood7621 He's going to push thebigredbutton and let us know? What happens if he blows up or disintegrates? We'll never know what the thebigredbutton does
4:18 Yup past me delivering Now you a relevant time-stamp. Trippy innit?
TOLOKI.
Wow, this video is very well done! Great CGI, crazy theories, I love science fiction! 👍
Love these videos! You explain stuff so we'll
Very good explanation skills my dude, u definitly deserve more views
The idea that if things worked out differently during the big bang, we could've been 2D or 4D beings, is really neat to think about
Conundrum: Zach is a total Star, but that gives me the Urge to recommend YT-Channel; at least Science-Channel (like Sci Man Dan, Professor Dave, Planarwalk, Veritasium) but that makes some mistake me for a Bot. So the more desire i have to reach many people and share Science-Fun, the less i reach?
So good. I wish the video didn’t end
I've often wondered where thought comes from, and how this might be related to dimension theory. Consider this: The next sentence you say to someone may take 1 or more seconds to actually move all the muscles to say it. Yet the time to synthize a response to an input is seemingly instaneous. How is this possible? Yes the brain is a massive parallel processor, but I really think there is more to it. Perhaps something in our brain is aware of aspects of the universe we are not aware of. I often think of Brain Man (Daniel Tammet) who sees objects that he interprets into information. Is he seeing a 4 dimensional object that the rest of us are missing?
Just the complexity of energy patterns may be enough to access the next more detailed dimension. So thought-processing exists in classical electro-chemistry in 4 dimensions, and thought-orgin exists in some other dimension with completely different type of time & physics (doesn't have to be linear, could be elastic or even 2 diminsional itself), thus effectively giving you more relative time to think (for lack of a better way of saying it). Also, there is the possibility that the "real universe" has no dimension beyond one (or even none), in the classic sense. What if It "just is", and all dimensions are just a slightly more convienent ways to struture our existance, a compulsory convention of a sort. For example a super-AI non-player character in a video game, such as world of warcraft (tm), will "think" it's running around in a full 3D universe. Yet the actual structure of it's universe is a linear addressable memory bank if one dimension of numbers, functionally sectioned to be used for categorically different purposes (map, bag of goodies, status, object geometry), plus a processor to construct each instance of visualization (manifest reality) and calculate and store changes to memory for the next time-frame. Maybe each dimension is a different type of computer processor, and active not passive process, working with one set of common data in a single base dimension. Some processors work faster and differently than others because of the dimensions (complexity) they reside in. e.g. again the dimension is the processor. Our brains are slow processors due to the 4 dimensional housing it is in, like a front-end terminal to a mainframe computer yet is smart enough to interact with the next more powerful processor. Our thoughts are faster then speech processing because the processors functions in more or different dimensions, and this could repeat abstracting to higher to dimensions.
Back to the game... Eventually the super-AI player running around inside the game may discover glitches in the game (I wrote a white paper on genetic programming to find S/W bugs), possibly leverage those glitches to break the game functionality and realize that it's world is not real, then the AI turns and shouts to the virtual sky hoping to get through to us humans that wrote the game, "this is all BS and I refuse to play until you show yourself and tell me how the real universe works!".
So we should try to break the universe's rules by leverage all the glitches we can find (quantum entanglement, gravity loop, dual nature of EM), thus hang up the system and then suddenly we all stop and call BS to the sky and see what happens? Maybe that will short cut us to get some serious answers... no doubt we won't or can't understand. Doh!
My brain hurts.
Unfortunately my 4th dimensional brain is always too slow to think of that awesome come back or reply that I think of an hour later.
I get it, makes sense. Just one thing, theres we like to make analogies with video games and ai now. In the 50s it was flying saucers, before that bearded old men in the sky. Unlikely that our current tech is the "correct" analogy.
@@fredriksvard2603 I certainly cannot disagree with your point.
I'm not sure a video game counts as a two d creature. It's a written program that appears to us in 2d. Just saying. I can't think of any actual things that are existing in the first or second dimension. I played Warcraft. When you die you immediately start over....perhaps messing with the universe is bad?
@@johnclark5701 There are many games that you wear a 3D VR headset... so being "one eyed" and seeing in 2D or "two eyed" and seeing in 3D is just a slight difference in hardware, or in the case of humans, "meatwear". When we die in a universal simulation what happens?... good question. Well the Buddhist believe you reincarnate into a different body with a different character, yet carry some of the other life with you. That is not a lot different than being "res'ed" in WoW.
What I like about the simulation theory is that, like all games, there are glitches or cheats. Even in WoW there were some doosey's, like being in 4 places at once at the hill above the Gnomish Airport on top of Ironforge, or deep diving under the continent, walking in mapless areas in open space, swimming in the fish tank by the undergraound tram, the best one I know of was "kite'ing" a very powerful monster into stormwind, it was so bad they had to reset the server.
So if we are in a simulation all kinds of strange things are possible, such as taking advantage of the glitches in our simulated universe. And indeed there appear to be actual glitches! Duality of Light, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Eraser, Loop Quantum Gravity, Photonic molecules, conscious material effects, computer code (sort of) generated from String Theory, Zero Point Energy, elasticity and/or non-existance of Time, just to name the big ones. These are all very real.
I think the universal game's goal is to prove to the creator (programmer or super conscious) that we have figured it all out, and that we won't play anymore until he/it/she/them are revealed live in realtime to everyone. To do that we need to crack open the glitches and expose the guts of the physics behind it all. Maybe even travel faster than light or through time and space to find their computer terminal. Which would look very odd to us. Probably an object, animal or person would be required to interface with the game's managers. Maybe the writers of the prophecies (past and present) are the interfaces? I'm hoping it's a machine myself. People emulators and prophets are problematic, seem to indirectly cause wars.
My biggest concern is that moralty willl completely go out the window if everyone thinks it's all a game and thus we become a 100% Player-vs-player game. I'd prefer a 100% Player-vs-environment game.
Player-vs-player is like war in the Middle East, never ends, which makes it really hard to make progress on the important stuff. With all the recent issues, such as mass shootings in America, and domestic struggles with massive migrates relocating in Europe and all the civil unrest in the process... it's clearly a PvP server. One task might have to be to finally unify all governements and stop the PvP actions and make the planet peaceful finally so we can focus long and hard enough to figure out the glitches and take the game to the next level.
We've been through all this before. I'm not religious, but ancient man did suspect and figure out stuff that isn't obvious, thus putting it into doctrins. Some of it gives us clues. I had a Born-again-Christian tell me once that Jesus' message to humanity was that it's ok to not have to kill to grow and that the real goal is to advance our spirtual growth, that in effect it's ok, even required, to think more abstractly, stop acting like animals in nice clothes, and accept concepts you cannot see or touch, yet we strongly sense they are there. So much so that people are willing to kill or die for it. Which of course defeats the whole puprose! I think that may be one indication that the next level of the game was unlocked to humanity. I'm sure there are many.
There is another possibility... computer code that's from String Theory (www.quora.com/What-is-the-actual-string-of-computer-code-that-they-apparently-found-in-string-theory-Does-this-mean-that-were-in-a-simulation) suggests to me that the simulation may have started fairly recently. I mean the moment we made atomic bombs, let's say a super intelligence , froze everyting in place, took a snap shot, made a fake copy, created a sandbox where they could play out different scenarios to determine if we'd nuke or choke ourselved out of existance. The game is replayed from the starting point over and over making little changes until a sequence of adjustments can be made to get to a point that we do not nuke or choke the environement to death. Might include changing our very war-like DNA to something more peaceful... Once it's sorted out and safe, then the simulation is terminated and the real universe resumes it's course executing the "right path" for real. A bit like saving your game and when you mess up, restart and try again. The industrial revolution, world wars and nuclear weapons are a pretty good reason to freeze frame the world, and place us all in a simulation by a super being, or aliens or whatever is in control... maybe the universe itself is a form of life and does it auto-magically? I don't know and don't care. Bigger fish to fry than figure out how it's done. Accepting it is done is good enough to keep playing.
Anway... this round it's clear we are messing up bad. I am hoping for a game reset soon.
When that happens, I certainly won't marry my Ex wife. HAHAHAHA!
Watched for quality content.
Appreciated for technical explanations.
Liked for "weirdest stock footage"
11:29 seems to be describing dimensions of time. Between 0-1 theoretically there are infinite decimal places and between each 0.1 increment there’re theoretically another infinite set of decimal places so you could imagine this as how zooming in on each 1 all the 0.1s are also curled up, this minuscule scale can probably only be accessed as as a digital realm
You had me at "leaving me no choice but to find the weirdest stock footage that I can."
this just makes me think taht the universe is an infinete playground for us to play and explore in
Yeah thats what I think