The Top 10 Inconvenient Facts About Climate Change
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Error correction: at 14:52 we said "orange means there's an upward trend and blue means a downward trend" but the reverse is true; orange is downward and blue is upward. White still means no signal in data.
In this "Fact Check" video from the Climate Discussion Nexus, Dr. John Robson examines 10 crucial facts about climate change, from the Earth being in an Ice Age right now to the lack of evidence of a crisis to computer models not working, that activists, politicians and journalists wouldn't like to talk about even if they knew about them.
To support the Climate Discussion Nexus, subscribe to our CZcams channel (www.youtube.com..., our Rumble channel (rumble.com/use..., our newsletter (at www.climatedisc...) and our podcast on Spotify (open.spotify.c...) and Google (podcasts.googl..., like us on Facebook ( / climatedn , follow us on Twitter ( / climatedn ) and Gettr (www.gettr.com/..., and make a monthly or one-time pledge at www.climatedisc...
You can also now buy CDN merchandise at climatediscuss...
As always we welcome comments. But please leave out the vulgarity (even as acronyms), allegations of criminality, conspiracy theories and angrily incomprehensible insults. Keep it clean, folks. Including please avoiding bodily functions in the comments, especially gross ones. Even if something is legitimately upsetting there are other ways of saying it.
And BTW since we've had some requests for links to sources in this video (which will appear underneath the video on our website as soon as we've checked the transcript for accuracy) here are the key ones for all ten items... plus one:
#10: We’re in an ice age
www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/whats-hottest-earths-ever-been
www.climate4you.com/GlobalTemperatures.htm#An%20overview%20to%20get%20things%20into%20perspective
#9: Thermometers invented during a Little Ice Age
climatediscussionnexus.com/videos/a-historian-looks-at-climate-change/
www.jstor.org/stable/1929485
#8 Data for less than 50% of Earth’s surface
journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/34/10/JCLI-D-19-0814.1.xml
climateaudit.org/2008/02/10/historical-station-distribution/
#7 CO2 far higher previously
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016703706002031
www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3004
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168192319302606
#6 97% Consensus
czcams.com/video/ewJ6TI8ccAw/video.html
#5 CO2 small warming effect
journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/12/8/1520-0442_1999_012_2327_trowvf_2.0.co_2.xml?tab_body=fulltext-display
www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/figures/chapter-4/figure-4-2/
#4 IPCC Doesn’t call it an emergency
www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_FullReport_small.pdf
#3 No connection with extreme weather
rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/what-the-ipcc-actually-says-about
www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/figures/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter12_Table_12_12_1.jpg
#2 Exaggerated scenarios
climatediscussionnexus.com/videos/the-rcp-8-5-cheat/
rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-unstoppable-momentum-of-outdated
#1 Too much warming in models
doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06493-w
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020EA001281
#11 Low ECS means no mitigation
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10018-020-00263-w
@John.... This is John from across Mitchell's Bay. 2 Basic questions no one seems to address; I hope you will.
Given that the oceans are contained by land that is more like a bathtub than a cylindrical glass, how much will the ocean surfaces increase per inch increase in depth ? (Per NASA, only 8 inch increase over the last century). 2. For that increase in surface area and given that evaporation is a cooling process, how much more heat would be required to raise the ocean level the 2nd inch than the first? Without that knowledge, any discussion by the alarmists about ocean levels and warming is superfluous.
As your presentations often imply, our ecosystem is basically a stable equilibrium and generally does act in a hyperbolic manner (like an atomic bomb) over a period of years in which humans could act. This is in contrast to what fear mongers say.
@@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096
To whom and what are you referring?
I think you better let the vulgarity ride. It's appropriate. Poo comes to mind, but anyone who wants to eat it, it's fine with me. So many lies, so little time.
So they are lying to us to tax us and steal our wealth!
@@therealdesidaru No. Life is not a dive into a sewer and our channel, at least, won't be.
It's all about money and control....Always has been.
it is about downgrading our lives, communism for the whole world!
remember ozone hole "disaster"? they promised end of the world as we know it. are we dead now?
No its a religion, a off shoot of earth worship.
And the Bible predicts such things in the end times, where people worship the creation rather than the creator, as in the God of Abraham Issac and Jacob the father of Jesus Christ.......
don't forget pure greed.
@@Mr71paul71it’s more than simple religion.
People have tried to scare me about the climate since 1972. I am done!
I still have a copy of Life Magazine where the cover said, “The Coming Ice Age.” I guess they got that one wrong too. My understanding is that one of the lead scientists on that charge later flipped and said we instead had a global warming problem. I think he was Al Gore’s mentor.
Are you mad? MAD? The world is LITERALLY boiling. Look of your window. BOILING
In 1949, Arthur C. Clark wrote “The Forgotten Enemy”, a story about a new Ice Age which scientific data of the day predicted to end the Holocene.
I rest my case.
@@clogs4956 So, everything hinges on ONE science fiction story? Boy, am I glad you don't have any influence in the real world.
BTW, extrapolation of the data available then.... well before there was any significant, coordinated data base and thirty years until the first satellite, global, data became available, the limited information, accurately, showed that the TSI of the sun was slightly diminishing.... it has now dropped by about 3 watts per square meter. At the same time, the Global Average Surface Temperature has risen sharply.
No, it's not the sun pumping in MORE heat, it's the atmosphere restricting heat outflow that is pushing the equilibrium higher.
The world has also scared you with the story from the Bible. Are you done with that too?
Fear: fear causes a call to action; a call to action calls for a government grant; the government grant funds the fear-monger(s); the cycle repeats.
The worst effect is the inflation caused by excess spending on this nonsense.
Such as WHEN did this happen?. Let's see it. And wouldn't you prefer it if a problem was studied rather than have the government spending money to facilitate the people who are creating the need for the call to action in the first place? It seems to me to be really stupid to spend money to propagandize people with weak minds to ignore problems. I'd rather spend that money to get the data about the issue and to then spend what it takes to prevent further damage.
You WILL notice that when Denier politicians and Denier scientists exit their positions, they most often move directly into fossil fuel-related corporations or "think tanks" to collect their pay-off.
So, YES, please DO follow the money.
Simple really
Just what I have been saying .its the grant money they want so they have to keep on telling the government and us lie after lie to make sure the money keeps on rolling in to them .how stupid are we to believe them 😱😵😵
@kimweaver1252 it would seem that you nailed "it"! Those nasty Deniers - Denier politicians.. Denier Scientists! A Denier behind every tree. Raising your game so artfully on name calling! Hopefully, nobody is paying you for those brilliant insights.
You definitely could benefit from reading Koonin's "Unsettled".. you just might learn a little climate science.. as opposed to the click-bait and fear porn of the daily "news" media.
Australia. They’ve homogenised all past temperatures to make it hotter than ever before .
Creative accounting. Statistics will tell any story you want them to. More lies for the weak minded. You're spot on.
@@rosa9079 a real scientist alters their theory to match the measured data
A 'climate scientist' alters the measured data to match their theory...
I'm 77 years old and a Queenslander - I remember really hot and really freezing conditions every summer and winter - however those hot days were only for a week or so and the freezing days were also about a few weeks otherwise the rest of the year was really very nice - this year was the same - hot days for a few weeks and freezing days for a few weeks - whats is the crisis everyone is referring to?
Freezing my nuts off here today in Moreton Bay Queensland.
Yea but it's australia. The socialist sheeple capital of the world.
Generations from now (assuming humans can keep from destroying themselves in the mean time) people will look back at the 'global warming alarmist' with pity and disdain for how much resources they wasted trying to stop something they could never have controlled to begin with and for how much they stopped human progress due to irrational fear
Very similar to eugenics.
Unfortunately people have always been ruled by irrational fear,it’s part of being human
To me the current situation appears to parallel the 1600s when there was a 100% consensus that bad weather was caused by witches. But then I'm not the historian.
@@craiglowen1470Very much so
Not irrational fear - it's largely a matter of adding to the destruction of western democracy by 'activists'.
I’m amazed that you haven’t been cancelled by all governments. You are stopping them making lots of money for themselves
Wait until he gets a million follower…
I'm afraid the herd is already about to the cliff, and soon to run off the cliff. Truth will only make the purveyors more frenzied.
Governments are frequently one of the problems and are often obstacles to dealing effectively with the collapsing habitat for humans on Earth. Governments collaborate with the criminal corporations. Human extinction IS a thing, you know. ALL species eventually become extinct and we have the dubious distinction of being aware of the inevitability while having some significant capacity to influence the length of our tenure. We also are ridiculous enough to think we are not going to be affected by the consequences of our actions.
@@jean-marclamothe8859 I doubt that
The government relies on the findings of experts, not on the chatter of a meaningless CZcamsr who is not specialized in that specific field and who spreads false information. He is not a 'threat'.
So bottom line is it’s been hotter and colder with more and less CO2 long before man was doing a damn thing. Seems pretty reasonable.
I'd like to know where all the billions of dollars went.
Check the trust funds of various political and bureaucratic party hacks.
You think Justin Trudeau went from being worth ~$2 million to over $100 million in 9 years *without* sticky fingers?
To friends of the powerful.
Al Gore.
"T" you must mean. It's Trillions now. We could have 400 nuclear power plants.
Follow the Benjamins, indeed.
How can something that's not even noticeable be a crisis?
Media makes it so. And vested interests in self sustaining nil producing organizations
Because it makes a lot of (the wrong) people f*cking RICH, that's why! Fear: fear causes a call to action; a call to action calls for a government grant; the government grant funds the fear-monger(s); the cycle repeats.
The same way a virus you don't know you've caught till you get tested for it is a pandemic.
Crisis is the money transfers being at risk for the 1% as they have pumped so much money into a new ponzi scheme and can't afford to see it fail..
In reality they don't give a rats a$$ about the planet, Just their pockets.
WEF, the We Say So company.
These videos are logical, backed by real data and analyzed to see what comes of it, rather than forcing an outcome. A truly refreshing discussion.
Backed by real data? Have you checked that? Or do you just accept what someone says to you? Scientific data shows something different.
You may like to watch these interesting videos:
Was the climate 'better' during the age of the dinosaurs? (More climate “facts” bite the dust.) czcams.com/video/ZqA4bDVmBB8/video.html
'Top CO2 facts' -- How much and how little CO2 is "plant food." czcams.com/video/VJoijPh2i-A/video.html
@@TheDancefreak35 Instead of yakking at people, why don't you take each of the 11 points made in the video and, using your 'scientific data that show something different', present your argument as to why these points are wrong, misleading, or just plain stupid? That would be more helpful than throwing shite at people.
@@harryposner7584 About 95% of climate scientists agree on global warming. But apparently 5% pseudo-scientists have a greater persuasive power on a certain group of people. They are not interested in peer reviewed papers, but in blogs. After all, it is easy to read. Any donkey can start a blog and pretend to be a climate scientist to supposedly 'debunk' the findings of real scientists. He doesn't trust the experts, but that's his problem, but that doesn't change the facts. Any idea why he doesn't cite the sources in the video? That's what a good journalist and someone with a PhD would do. So everyone could check it for themselves. But then everyone would find out he's talking nonsense. He has also never published anything on a scientific site about this matter. Why not? Because other scientists immediately poke holes in it. If you think that the scientific theory about global warming is incorrect, then you should tell the scientific journals about it with your corresponding theory. I don't have to prove anything, because it is available for everyone to see. He must prove to the scientific community why the scientists' theory is incorrect.
You forgot to include the fact that climate models don't model the climate. They don't even include cloud coverage.
The inability to include effects of clouds is their greatest weakness.
They model the model dammit the model says listen to the government it is wise and all knowing
@@davepaisley7675 🤣
They also don't model any of the solar and cosmic inputs beyond the 5th grade version of TSI.
Their climate model can’t even predict yesterday’s weather even when you plug in the actual data.
This video should be mandatory viewing for all media journalists and politicians from local councilors to parliamentarians and all primary and secondary students at least once a year. Sadly the Tertiary students have already locked in to their psyches to make any difference to their thinking.
Year 7 and 8 students are being forced to watch video footage of storms, droughts and bushfires and then answer questions about how to stop climate change which is causing these 'extreme' weather events. So sad to see a generation of children abused psychologically
@@gjward64 making activists... 🤫
Yes, but only to prepare the legitimate press for the level of deliberate, self-imposed ignorance they will face in the Denier World
I agree, along with an extensive debunking and exposure of the faudulent Denier bullshitters. You know..... teach the controversy. Both sides.
It wouldn’t matter if they had a Clockwork Orange type viewing of this vid. Until enough people stand up and vote against the climate kooks, nothing will change.
"The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible."
~UN IPCC
Oy! Keep that quiet. How else can Klaus, Bill et al get us all to live in cold caves eating bugs?
@@thesmallnotesduoKlaus retired. Bill running the show now lol
@@7jjessie Until we stop him and his ilk, my friend
czcams.com/video/1QcyTj6pa9E/video.html&ab_channel=TomNelson
The IPPC is not the big problem, but the summary for policy makers (made by politicians) is the culprit.....
Be careful, CZcams doesn't like the truth..
They do however, believe in censorship...big time.
CZcams can't handle the truth
Don't present too many facts you will get a strike against the channel.
It would be a first. Facts, I mean.
@@kimweaver1252 Ah yes, except you cannot disprove anything being said here. All of the points are easily verifiable.
@@snakeace0 Ok, you are on....... Pick your top three and verify them. Three..... two........one........GO!
@@snakeace0 Maybe you should look into a real scientific study. Then you can verify it for yourself. What he says does not match what you see. That should already be a sign.
@@kimweaver1252 You are the one claiming these facts to be false. The burden of proof is on you, since the sources of the data are visible in the video. Pretty darn easy to google.
Like the old George Carlin joke: Here’s the temperature at the airport. Which is kinda weird because I don’t know anyone who lives at the airport. The Hippe Dippee Weather Man
Hahaha! Love George.
And here we have a Canadian Low moving in from the north and a Mexican High moving in from the south which is a lot more fun.
Al Sleet, IIRC.
I used to work near Newark airport in the US and it was always about 5 degrees hotter there than anywhere else. But that was where they took the temps.
They use the Airports as historically they where always warmer than rural temps with large concrete and tarmac surfaces that absorb the heat from aircraft engines, they also use this trick by using city temps with more people condensed into a small area producing more heat.
Thank you John and CDN
You're welcome, as always.
10 FACTS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING >>>
1. There is no global warming
2. The earth isn't warming
3. There is no sea level rise
4. Weather isn't more extreme
5. There is no global warming
6. Climate changes, climate change is a myth
7. The oceans aren't rising
8. The earth isn't warming
9. There is no climate catastrophe, emergency, or crisis
10. There is no global warming
Did I miss anything ^_^
I would add: it's all natural.
There is no global warming
I'm 77 years old and I remember really hot and really freezing conditions every summer and winter - however those hot days were only for a week or so and the freezing days were also about a few weeks otherwise the rest of the year was really very nice - this year was the same - hot days for a few weeks and freezing days for a few weeks - whats is the crisis everyone is referring to?
Yes, you missed the fact that there is global warming. And the oceans are rising. It is just based on natural processes and not human activity.
You forgot to mention that there is no global warming.
In all scams certain groups of people get very rich
Dont care about the world's temperature as long as it stays flat!
It won't - it never has and never will.
@@thesmallnotesduo So, it goes from flat to......... what? Dodecahedronal? Cubic?
@@kimweaver1252 LOL I meant the temperature. You think the earth is flat? Why not? Nobody will get hurt by that idea. But a 'climate crisis'? Now that idea will hurt millions of decent people who deserve better.
😂
@@thesmallnotesduo Who gets hurt if the reality of what is happening is made clear to heavily propagandized consumers of Fossil Fueler drivel.
"Everything is FINE. This is FINE".
"Don't look up"...... or at any data... or even at the news. NO, don't do that.
In addition, the "97%" result is only achieved after manipulation data not allowed by current statistcal science. When the acceptable statistics were applied to the data, the "consensus " was more like 50-50 or 55% to 45%.
The 97% was from the respondents (about 3000) from the entire batch of questionnaires sent to about 25,000 scientists. Do THAT math, and it's only about 11% who are "in consensus."
So, it's a much larger "manipulation" as you state!
@@4edward61 and not all climate scientists, just randos
Right. This is like making the statement that "97% of catholic bishops agree that Catholicism is the one true faith". lol
Add in a large lobbying aspect where billions in grants are at stake - well people/organisations will say and do anything to justify their own existence.
In a survey, it’s not what you ask but who you ask. Ask the “right” people and you can get the outcome you want.
@@4edward61 Yup. Forgot about THAT.
My big complaint is the media being the wrong message, perhaps?
If someone tells me to "trust the science" I would ask them to name a scientist.
Note: Al Gore is not a "scientist" but I think that he thinks he is an "expert," maybe?
Definition of expert: Past tense of drip.
Well, one definition of “expert” is as follows:
An “ex” is a has-been and a “spurt” is a drip under pressure…
I have always agreed with my father in law that an expert is someone who has made more mistakes in their chosen field or discipline that anyone else.
What exactly makes Al Gore an expert? If I understand recent history correctly, he's been wrong about his predictions nearly all of the time.
According to him Florida would have been under water for 4 years by now.
The one question I have never found an answer for is "What is the best temperature for the world to be at?"
So far? The temperature it's currently at, or a little warmer. Just a degree or so warmer would enable massive grain production to move north to beautiful but too-cold farmland in Canada. Russia, China, Greenland, and even a bit in the US. Think small, even a 5-mile wide band of land wrapped around the globe could mean an incalculable amount of extra grain.
@Bob_Adkins
But it would be easily calculable; in metric tons.
Sorry, that doesn’t exist !
In every big system (and this one is hugh) temperatures are controlled itself with error in compare to say nautral temperature . This error is unavoidable to activate correction action. . Actualy we see error in plus activating process of lowering temperatures to 8 deg down in very long term Nobody can say which temperature is optimum because we do not know criteria used by nature. .
@@garyballard179 Is that a slur against the English measurement system, or a comment about the climate? 😁
How about a top 10 gloom and doom repercussions of human activity?
1. Let’s see, not long after the global cooling scare, we went to acid rain and all the ensuing property damage..
2. Hole in the ozone and skin cancers exploding to the point some might live underground.
3. Ocean acidification and the intentional misinterpretation that oceans will soon turn to acid.
4. Implying El Niño is linked to human activity with what seemed like wall to wall coverage in the late 80’s, early 90’s
5. Ice caps gone in the summer, surely winter ice will soon follow
6. Bleached coral. The Great Barrier Reef will go extinct in your lifetime unless you act now.
7. Polar bears nearing extinction due to starvation.
8. Hurricane and tornado frequency and intensity off the charts.
9. Wild fires are something new and definitely not made worse by poor forest management and the necessity to stamp them out for property protection, leaving an unnatural level of fuel waiting for the next spark.
10. Millions and millions of square kilometers of coastline will soon be flooded so why not own 4 beach houses on the most expensive real estate on the planet and fly private.
A list of Denier wet dreams. You will note that several of this problems were detected ..... by scientists studying the atmosphere and seas...... and a significant legal regime was instituted to deal with the problems and they have had reasonable success, CONFIRMING the science and the utility of the social and legal framework which was created. So, POINTS for REALISTS! Slaps to DENIERS.
@@kimweaver1252 Jeez, Kim. I can’t tell if you’re being serious or using sarcasm for comedic effect. I’ll bite. Please forgive me if I went the wrong way with this one, but go ahead and pick a number and explain to the rest of the class how a “legal regime” fixed it? On second reading, you’re definitely being sarcastic 😂
@@oddsman01 You now demonstrate the Denier's limitations. Inability to detect reality. Love of warm, soft, comfy delusion.
@@oddsman01 Legal regime? How about if you saunter down to your hardware or auto parts store and buy some R12 refrigerant (Freon) to refill your A/C system and tell me how that works out?
@@kimweaver1252 Yes, there’s no chance it was a gross exaggeration and fear mongering. It was banning R12, which is heavier than air, that fixed that hole in the ozone 20 km’s straight up? Or maybe it was the hairspray. 😂
I remember the promises of R134A, which is also heavier than air, but for some reason it was replaced by the $20 per GRAM 1234yf, you know, for the environment. Ironically, the latest refrigerant is hydrocarbon based. Just one big circle. I assume you have no questions whatsoever and not only use the vernacular of Rachael Maddow and almost everyone on the View, but also agree with every word these high paid used car salesmen have ever muttered?
I just wish more people would understand this type of information, so then they might make better informed decisions. I'm glad I've been financially supportive of this channel for over a year now. Good work, CDN. Glad you are out there.
Some people that I have tried to convince that this is a con say "if it was the main stream media would be all over it" and getting them to watch CDN no chance, where's the wall so I can Bang my head. I have managed to changed some peoples beliefs but it's hard going the younger they are the harder it is, as the teachers preach global warming.
I'm in California's South San Joaquin Valley and we've been cooking lately with temps hitting 114°F. This would worry me, but I'm 70 years old and have seen it here a couple of times before. Keep up the good work
I remember the hot summers 40 years ago.
Our entire psyche has been harmed by climate change alarmism. Nearly every person in the media, when reporting climate issues, uses the term "made more severe by man made global warming".
In the past we'd simply say, this is really hot today, or raining heavier than usual etc. Now, the world is going to end.
We've been brainwashed.
I feel sorry for younger people who truly believe it due to a lack of previous experience.
I grew up in Fresno. Wore t shirt and shorts from Mar to Oct. Was outside all the time. 114 was normal.
When I was a kid we use to have a term for it....summer...
@@Mr.Benson summer with No school.
I used to live in the Philadelphia, PA area. Several years ago (~ 2020) I read that Philadelphia had its hottest December on record. So, I did a bit of research and found that one December back in the 1700's was so warm that people were swimming in the Delaware and Schuylkill rivers! So the "record" is certainly not the complete climate story.
Indeed. There's that darn history again.
Thanks John and the CDN - I'm scientifically qualified myself, and it always smelled a bit funky when I was listening to the latest "Climate Crisis!" report on TV - thanks to you, I can see that a lot of journalists (and therefore politicians) are chasing headlines, not facts, cheers for the grounding!
They are chasing huge, unearned and undeserved authority over people-- all people.
Only 10. I would expect the field to be very crowded indeed. Those 10 must have been tough to pick.
Yeah, it's a bit like playing whack-a-mole. But we thought these were the most important ones to know about in order to help people who've swallowed the Party line to rethink it.
For the slow, yes, this would have been very difficult.
@@Uriel-Septim. Then the star map should be very similar no matter where on Earth you are. There is only one direction which is "UP". Right? I have DONE this experiment. I have lain on a rather too rocky beach in the Okanagan in Canada and observed a startlingly clear sky. I have also done this at Lake Arrowhead in California. On many beaches and boats in my Hawaii. I have also done it in one of my favorite places in the world.....Queenstown, New Zealand. The sky is VERY DIFFERENT in each spot. With the greatest difference between Canada and NZ. That should not happen on Pizza Planet. That CAN'T happen on Pizza Planet. It only happens on a globe.
@@kimweaver1252 The north star/Polaris stay in its place and the fixed stars continue to rotate around us and end up in the same place year after year and the wandering star (plantes) are the only once making a geometric pattern, sailors have use the north start to navigate by, for as long as we have traveled the sea, would be hard to do on a rotatin, spinning hurling planet moving around the milky way, same with places like stonehenge and the pyramids that have mark the stars for thousend of years.
@@Uriel-Septim. No, that most definitely is not correct. All of the stars make a circular pattern in the sky. NOW you need to tell me why there are different stars visible in the Northern hemisphere than there are visible in the Southern hemisphere? How does that work on Pizza Planet?
Never trust a man clutching a computer model.
Yep. I studied mathematical modelling at university level. I wouldn't trust a model even if it was in my favour.
Like Prof Neil Fergusons as well - all disasters!!!
Or a patron's cheque.
EXACTLY…..”learn to live with it”
Stop wasting our money & sending us back to the Stone Age!!!
The UN agitprop is annoying.
Denier agitprop is laughable. And annoying. Weird, too.
I know in the 80's when we come to Australia it was warm all year, now winters are brutal. In old homes built for a warm climate
You tube the censor and shadow banning champion!
Thank you for staying in the fight. My father knew there was a problem with the assertions being made by Al Gore and company more than 20 years ago. He was able to put his hands on detailed Soviet studies on ice core samples going back to right after World War II up to 1990. They had plotted temperatures back many hundreds of years and also made projections forward. Their work showed exactly what you have been saying. He correlated that with earth’s orbit around the sun and the slight variation or “wobble” that has been documented. He surmised that much of the temperature variation over the thousands of years could be attributed to the earth passing closer or further from the sun during the periods in question. All of the detailed temperature graphs lined up quite well with the graphs of earth’s orbit.
11 out of 10👍
Call it corporate media, not mainstream.
As a geology student in the 'early 70's environmental geology was all about the climate becoming colder and harsher..Fear of cold was impressed on us. 😅😅😅
you've nailed it; "imprinting fear" on the population. Never let an emergency go to waste.
Ah, yes. "The Coming Ice Age". I remember it well.
A geology student is not a climate student. So it's not surprising that you don't understand it.
@@jefferyindorf699Yes, it was frequently in the newspapers, wasn't it!
@@TheDancefreak35 Funny
12. Logarithmic decline in CO2 warming 13. CO2 sequestration being the prevailing geological trend due to pesky animals and vegetation forming sedimentation. 14. Plants and animals are happy to move to, and become, greener pastures. Seasons and draughts have been lessons learned by all biota that are perfectly adaptable to changing climate conditions. 15. CO2 bellow 150 ppm is death for life.
@@cisnerosigonda number 15 should be screamed from the roof tops! The VAST majority of people fail to realize we came far closer to ending life on this planet as we know it due to a LACK of Co2 than ever having an overabundance of it
Well noted… Exactly this!👍
Absolutely correct! Good job!
@@gusmc2220 There have never been any people........nor the crops and food animals we depend on....... when the GAST has been above 15C. THERE is a 15 to think about.
@@talisikid1618 Absolutly INCORRECT. There, I fixed it for you.
This reminds me of what a classmate said back in the 1980's while we were studying to become engineers (mechanical and chemical). "If engineers ran the world, everything would work, and nobody would be happy."
If more folks could do the math we would not be having such discussions about "extreme weather." When the data is ignored, what we get is what sounds like a bunch of 2-year-olds arguing about what color dinosaurs were. Who knows and does it really matter?
I'm sure the colour of dinosaurs matters if there is a massive research grant attached to it.
I was hoping that you include the cloud coverage caused by the warming of the oceans that causes solar radiation to be reflected back out into space. Thus being more responsible for cooling than warming. As in previous interviews, I’ve seen, that the planet employs a balancing act. Thus, the short term least, earth takes care of itself much more powerfully than humans can.
Also important. But alas our dial on this one only went to 11 not 12. Maybe in volume 2.
Marine Clud Brightening was proposed by the late Professor Steven Salter. Using salt water mist. The salt particles form nucleation points. Particularly since 2020 with the banning of sulphur from shi fuel, there has been a big reduction of clud formation over oceans. Because the air is now too clean - devoid of particles for nucleation points. Clouds cannot form without these, even if the air is otherwise humid enough that clouds could form. czcams.com/video/SMvQHVUh1rA/video.html
@@ClimateDN This is Spinal Tap redux?
@@brianketelboeter8522 When you go to 11, you go to 11.
Outstanding video. I would add that 1) it's not scientifically valid to average the less skilled climate models in with the more skilled models. Doing that does not buy any additional accuracy or precision in future predictions. In fact, it's obviously so bogus that anyone who does this (like the IPCC) has no credibility whatsoever. The best that can be done is to show the entire spaghetti diagram that clearly demonstrates the huge variation in model output, 2) In the U.S., where there are longer records than anywhere else, the 1930s have been shown to have been the decade with the most heat waves. 3) Even over the just the last century temperature measurements show that CO2 is NOT the sole control knob on the climate. There was a long period from about 1940 to 1975 when global temperatures dropped, despite rising CO2. 4) The global major cyclone frequency and the Accumulated Cyclone Energy has actually dropped over the last 30 years. This is just one measure that has actually improved with the change in climate, not what is routinely claimed in the dishonest press. Other false claims are; 5) Desert area is not growing, it's shrinking. The Earth is greening, 6) Wildfire frequency has actually dropped over the last century, 7) Sea Level Rise is not inundating most islands. 8) Most of the high temperature records from urban areas are due to temperatures that have warmed due to the Urban Heat Island effect in areas that have grown. The UHI is NOT corrected for in temperature records. For example, a study shows that over 80% of the warming seen in Phoenix over the last 50 years is due to UHI. 9) The ocean isn't acidifying, it's actually become very slightly more neutral. The decrease of 0.1 units of pH over the last century is far less than the natural variability seen in many places over 1 day.
Nice one.
On that last point, nobody knows what the pH of the oceans was a century ago. The IPCC said the pH had dropped from 8.2 to 8.1. The 8.2 was simply made up, and so is 8.1, because the pH varies enormously with location, season and depth. The whole ‘acidification’ scare is complete nonsense.
@@MsBiggles51 Good point. That brings up one more - whenever data is shown without error bars, it's poor science.
@@markmeridian3360 Yes, and the head of IPCC said a few years ago that when data and models disagree, the data are wrong!
During the Medieval, Roman, Minoan, Sumerian, Egyptian... Warm Periods when greenhouse gas levels were high, the Arctic treeline moved north, the altitude at which plants can grow moved up, and the deserts were reduced (not expanded). How is this a crisis (& How did it not make this list)?
CO2 is irrelevant and there was no correlayion with CO2. There’s over a dozen known climate cycles, all ignored by the IPCC.
For these misconceived anxieties we are building bird- and bat-chopping machines in the ountryside. How is that care for the environment?
They apparently forgot what happened when Chairman Mao ordered all the sparrows killed. Because he thought they were eating grains for food.
It turns out that their main diet was insects, and a basically plague level infestation caused a serious famine.
The bats I'm less concerned about but I grew up in California well aware of the decades-long efforts to reintroduce the wild condor, and hearing the success of that project was always a point of pride for the environmental movement, by my sights. Those windmills chop the giant birds.
I'm so tired of the political nanny state CZcams continues to push. They are pathetically relentless in their propaganda
Marxism / Communism is always unrelenting. To the Left (whence all this rubbish originates ) *everything* is political. Everything. That is why you see it in your schools, your cinemas, your Universities, your social media platforms (with a few exceptions), the MSM, the judiciary, law enforcement, the welfare State, your healthcare systems.
Everything is political and, therefore, everything is fair game. Which is why, since the end of the Second world War, the Left started its Long Msrch Through The Instotutions and why, in 2020, they felt confident enough to burst forth out of the woods to assault us on all sides.
Thanks John for your factual reports. I always share them trying to enlighten the simple minded sheep. It's a uphill battle, but we must persevere. 👍😁🇺🇲
Bravo!.... Sad thing is that the few people I know that are still under the spell, would never take the time to watch.
Human understanding of systems is so primitive it's laughable to think we can make accurate predictions about a system as complex as climate. In most cases we can't even accurately predict outcomes of systems we created.
To know how much is down to us, we need to know how much warming (or cooling) would have happened had we been absent. We could then subtract the 'natural' change, from what we've observed- and that would leave us with the anthropogenic component. Trouble is, we have no idea what would have changed had we not been here. Frankly, I can think of dozens of things more worth fretting about, if fret we must.
Well, the sun controls it all, so you don't have to worry. We're doing nothing that will have any effect, we are insignificant dust to the sun, it handles all the details. We'd do well to have more CO2 though, we could even green the deserts, make life better for us humans while the sun lets us stay here. Plants are made from CO2 after all. :)
@@SimonWallwork exactly and considering EVERY planet in our solar system with a significant atmosphere has experienced warming we (should) know for a fact that at minimum SOME of the warming we have experienced is well beyond human influence. Yet alarmist are adamant that ALL measured warming is somehow human caused. As if the planet's temperature would remain perfectly unchanged otherwise.
Is that wilful ignorance or straight up malice on their part? More importantly does it really matter which considering what they want to implement will result in the destruction of modern life as we know it?
The temperature was about in balance up to around 1970. So just use that as the baseline - subtract the temperature then, from the temperature now, to answer your question. czcams.com/video/SMvQHVUh1rA/video.html
@StabilisingGlobalTemperature lmfao yeah, of course! Go ahead and use the coldest point in the last 200 years as your baseline. Not like you're Cherry Picking that time frame on purpose huh...
_"There was a chill across the world, and it wasn’t just the cold war. From the 1940s to the mid-70s, the planet seemed to be in the grip of a global cooling. For a while, almost every outbreak of extreme weather was blamed on it. Some members of a new scientific discipline, climatology, predicted a new ice age. Yet before the 70s were out, temperatures were rising"_
@StabilisingGlobalTemperature lmfao yeah, of course! Go ahead and use the coldest point in the last 200 years as your baseline. Not like you're Cherry Picking that time frame on purpose huh...
_"There was a chill across the world, and it wasn’t just the cold war. From the 1940s to the mid-70s, the planet seemed to be in the grip of a global cooling. For a while, almost every outbreak of extreme weather was blamed on it. Some members of a new scientific discipline, climatology, predicted a new ice age. Yet before the 70s were out, temperatures were rising"_
Thanks for exposing the truth. Keep up the good work. Cheers.
Love how CZcams disabled the auto-play audio and slap their “the more you know” propaganda warnings on everything.
Yes, & usually the little blue box is a sign of good content.
I have been calling BS on climate crisis since the 1980’s.
Thats a long time to be ignorant
@@dougcard5241 If you want to see "ignorance", check your mirror.
Great job! Now get the "Chicken Littles" to grasp these facts!
This and Tony Heller are my favourite climate channels
The one thing left out in this study is the financial profits made by politicians who support massive investments and profit directly or indirectly. How effective is advertising?
It's hard to be sure. But those kinds of politicians are opportunistic, so they'd find a way to cash in on whatever the current frenzy was. The important part is to combat bad policy based on bad science, which is far more expensive.
@@ClimateDN I would like to know who is financing CDN. My guess: it's the oil industry.
@@ClimateDN And to your number #4: It would be shocking if the IPCC would use the word "Climate Crisis" or "Climate Emergency" - The report is written by scientists, and crisis and emergency are not scientific terms.
@@mmarybe Oh, that's original. Attack motives not arguments. But tell me this: the overwhelming majority of funding for climate research and advocacy, at least 90%, comes from governments. Are you even slightly concerned about a potential conflict of interest there, or do you have absolute and total faith in politicians' purity? And is anyone who takes public money thereby sanctified, whereas anyone who takes money from private donors (we are in fact crowd-funded) is necessarily tainted?
@@mmarybe Which is why hospitals have an ER? Or are doctors lacking in scientific training? In any case, if all kinds of politicians and activists say the IPCC has declared an emergency and you say they not only haven't, they never would, doesn't it say something about the reliability of the politicians and activists?
Thank you for your common sense approach to science. I hope your channel continues to thrive and reach more and more people as the MSM has clouded the facts for profit, not real science.
Great video, hoping the World will watch it
Thanks. Please share it with any portion of the world you think will find it helpful, and we'll get the word out one open mind at a time.
Thanks for the great work...
You’re welcome. As always please share, subscribe to and support our work.
Best summary I have seen on the topic. As a number 12 you could add the positive effects of increased and longer growing seasons on agricultural yields.
Google Context lie box of course has to be put up
so much for allowing a person to decide for themselves - if I wanted to 'Fact Check' this video I am quite capable of doing it myself.
You seem to miss that the extreme rich people need more of our tax money.
How about adding this one to the list at no. 0 . the fact that 97% of all co2 emissions comes from the earth itself, less than 3% comes from human activity . Plus, co2 is a nutrient for all plant life , not a toxic pollutant that the alarmists would have you believe
Your list is well chosen and well supported with real facts. I might argue that item number eleven is the most important in that it has the greatest impact on our lives. Not spending untold billions of dollars trying to fix a non problem is a very smart thing to do. Unfortunately, politics is not about truth but votes, and as long as there are people out there who that we need to be alarmed about climate change We will have politicians Willing poor taxpayers dollars Down the rat hole.
Regular people around the World are being impoverished by high energy prices which have caused many small to medium businesses to close. Kids are being brainwashed by this insane nightmare narrative. Green Energy Czars are making billions. When will we wake up ? CDN should be compulsory viewing.
Politicians are usually more concerned with being seen to do something, than actually doing something they believe in. There are of course a modicum of honest Politicians.
True, and it's a problem we can't completely solve. But sufficient unto the day and all that, so we'll tackle this one and then see what comes next.
When I told one person that we're in one of the coolest periods in the history of our planet, she told me to medicate myself. It's a faith not baded of facts...
I’m keeping that video!!
Thanks John-keep up the great job.😊
Thankyou so much!!!!! I wish my kids would listen to you.
If you read the book "The State of Fear" by Michael Crichton you will understand where the Hysteria is derived from.
And get some classic haunting Crichton scenes including that one with the octopus.
I read that back in the 1990s and it probably helped my understanding of what is going on with governments.
The latest issue of AARP has an amazing article about hurricanes and rising sea levels are going to destroy oh so many lives of seniors who are more susceptible to not only climate chage, but believing the drivel from the author. It's bad enough when this is published on line, or in some obscure magazine, but negligent when your target is those most easily inifluenced. Thank you CDN and Dr Robson for this information.
AARP jump the shark when they endorsed Obama and raved about his Obama Care health care system for all Americans !
They are just Demorat POS !
Thank you for what you do. God bless
Great video as usual John. I send them to all the Climate Cultists I know. 👏👏👏
1) How are they measuring past temperatures? NOT ice cores I trust. Ice cores were proved to be cold/warm intervals, NOT annual rings.
2) Accurate temperature reading (I have two sources in my little town for temperature, it varies by as much as 10 degrees!!!!).
3) 50% yes. They are NOT measuring temperatures in the entire Southern Hemisphere. (Antarctic summer last year was 60 below F.)
4) CO2 is very good, plant food. Why do they hate it? Volcanoes are probably the highest source, man contribution is very low compared.
5) Science is not consensus. 3 pillars of science are Observable - Testable - Repeatable.
6) How can any credible scientist place the entire weight of warming on CO2?
7) How accurate are altimeters? How do they track sea level rise down to a millimeter?
8) Today we have worldwide communications. There is ALWAYS a crisis record somewhere in the world. But it is never repeated annually.
9) Real world science confirms no crisis.
10) The year 2000 proved all projections not only wrong, but the opposite occurred. Signs in Glacier NP claiming the glaciers would be gone by a date did not happen.
11) Again, you can't have a true world climate observation without the entire Southern hemisphere!! CO2 is beneficial much more than detrimental. As we witness today, politically and broadcast by a communist mainstream media, the lies are 24/7 deep...and... THE SILENCE OF TRUTH IS A LIE.
MY observations over the last 66 years where I lived in Nothern Indiana; The winters warmed and we had less snow since 1978...BUT... the summers cooled shortening our summer by half a month.
Thankyou. I always enjoy your videos. ❤
You’re welcome. As always please share, subscribe to and support our work.
Great list, but I wish you’d mentioned the 60-year climate cycle, which explains the warm period in the 30s, the cooling of the 50s and 60s (even as CO2 was rising rapidly), the warming of the 80s and 90s, the so-called pause of the 2000s, and the current cooling.
The climate changes 4 times EVERY year & more than that in Britain, SO glad to see that you are waking up to REALITY❗
Milankovitch cycles
The CO2 level in atmmospheric air is 0.04%, the impact from human activities is 2% of the 0,04% (0.008%). Optimal CO2 for plant growth (injected into green houses to speed up growth) is more than doubble of the 0.04%. Climate has been changing for millions of years, and will continue to do this, unless we change the ballance in the universe.
I've been sharpening sticks since 1979!
They sent out a warning yesterday for us to stay indoors between 8am to 8pm, they said it was going to be 32, in my car and in my kitchen it was 25, which to me is a normal summer for July here in the uk, it's called the weather for gods sake, i bet all the covid believers stayed in all day, people are so easily duped nowadays.
~ 19.00 min
"The more the models bungle the more the designers make them worse" 🤣🤣🤣
15:20. Forest fires should have been added to the list. Gavin Newsome famously walked through the smoldering ashes of a CA forest fire and claimed the fire was proof to our eyes that climate change was real.
Using his exact same logic and insight to his behavior and I'll claim that Newsom is a slimy lizard from another planet.
global warming alarmism is akin to the medieval debate about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Most people aren’t even aware of carbon dioxide’s basic properties, and how its ability to ‘warm up’ the climate is limited to the range of 0 to 100 parts per million; beyond this (currently we have around 425ppm) it has no significant warming ability. See Markus Ott and Tom Shula’s excellent presentation on carbon dioxide and the ‘missing link’ in the greenhouse effect on Tom Nelson’s channel 👍🏻🏴
Brilliant work as always
Inexpensive reliable energy created the modern world. It's the modern world that keeps us safe. The world needs more fossil fuels not less.
Good work.
You could add:
- Increasing plant green and photosynthesis due to increasing CO2 observed by NASA during the last 20 years
- The heat capacity of the seas are about 900 times of that of atmospehere (read: the heat is in the seas)
- We only know the atmospheric temperature in an adequate way for thermodynamic analysis including simulations since 1979
- Carbon cycle figures would make a lot of people doubt the green narrative - and as shown even in this video the CO2 level is not stable. We dont know scientifically if the annual extra 4 gigatonnes of carbon in the sky is done by humans. We can only believe so - which makes it a religion contrary to claims that it all is science.
- quite a few more
👍🏼This should be shown in every class room.
For fact-checking, of course!
SO I get to keep my raggety old pick-up 🙂
I've gotten to the point where I don't bother even reading weather news. When I do, I notice that "climate change" is mentioned less and less.
If they can only forecast the weather three days out with 50% accuracy, how do they think they can predict the future climate?
You can predict that it's going to be colder in January than it is in July right?
@@jackasdasd5143 Not sure if you’re attempting to be a troll, or if you didn’t understand the context of my comment
I think often over looked is that climate models being wrong on predicted temperture rise , are also often even more wrong in what their predictions of the actual earth temperature ( eg a clime model may predict a 2c temperture rise , but also predict the earth temperature average should be 19c )
Thank you for injecting rational discussion into a politicized topic! The science is never 'settled' and neither should rational debate and discussion.
You're welcome. As always please share, subscribe to and support our work.
To add to the list that would also be useful...dispelling the fear mongering about ocean acidification and sea level rise.
Follow the money. Having no crisis to be scared of makes the population less malleable.
I visited the Maldives in the early 90s as we were told they'd be underwater within the next 20 years. It's now 2024, their sea level hasn't changed.
Where I live in South Africa, they can't even predict what the weather will be like the day after tomorrow!
I have 3 weather apps on my phone (including the official one that my tax money is paying for) and they're all different and mostly wrong!
How on earth does anyone claim to predict climate change?
Great video John, fully onboard with all your points. Net zero is a money grab, plain and simple.
Thank you. With this I can help convince a fair number of people that they are so very wrong on Climate Change,
Great list! I am now almost 70 and I have never forgotten what one of my primary school teachers said, ( mostly because it scared me a bit) “The Earth’s natural state is covered in ice! And is now in a temporary warm period!” Those Nun’s knew a thing or two😄
Nice, a Spinal Tap tie in.
Glad you spotted it. We also had one in a Readout about the attempt to vandalize Stonehenge, BTW.