A Short History of Feminism | Rt. Rev'd Dr. Gavin Ashenden
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 06. 2023
- In this clip, the former Chaplain to Queen Elizabeth II, Rt. Rev'd Dr. Gavin Ashenden, gives an overview of the three major waves of feminism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See full interview here: • Gavin Ashenden | The N...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversations feature John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, interviewing the world's foremost thought leaders about today's pressing social, cultural and political issues.
John believes proper, robust dialogue is necessary if we are to maintain our social strength and cohesion. As he puts it; "You cannot get good public policy out of a bad public debate."
If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here: / @johnandersonmedia
And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: johnanderson.net.au/contact/
Follow John on Twitter: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Facebook: / johnandersonac
Support the channel: johnanderson.net.au/support/
Website: johnanderson.net.au/
Podcast: johnanderson.net.au/podcasts/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gavin Ashenden
/ gavinashenden
ashenden.org
Today's feminists need to ask themselves this: What's stronger? My love for women, or my hatred for men? They'll deny they feel hate, but it's there for everyone to see.
The third wave (of feminism) is the ultimate form of indifference and nihilism.
It seeks societies total compliance and in doing so kills the very society in totality.
No family
No children
No morals.
Nihilism of madness.
At 14 I realize I'm more of a feminist than 3/4 of the self-proclaimed feminists (at least I know the history of the suffragettes, how women got rights and I'm for equality between all men and women)
Spot on !
Thank you both . Gavin and John in conversation - what's not to like .
Blessings to you both .
I just wave back.
“Just smile and wave boys…smile and wave”
- Skipper
The 2 world wars had a considerable effect on women's work outside of the home.
So has labour saving domestic appliances, the improvements in sanitation and healthcare (that has reduced childhood mortality) and birth control.
Indeed wars bring nothing but distruction
@@reuvenpolonskiy2544another side effect is is Discovery and innovation
Let us not forget that one of Elizabeth Cady Stanton s primary works
Was re-writing the bible
Primarily the law of Moses
Feminism is great example of slippery slope
Excellent interview. Really enjoy Dr Ashenden
Maybe the Amish have it right?!?
Women have to be home and never CEOs.
You're free to join them.
Did know there is as much domestic abuse in Amish marriages as in secular marriages? People are people - You can take the tiger out jungle but you cant take the jungle out of the tiger. So no they don't have it figured out.
The other added advantage that 2nd wave brought was added tax revenues into state coffers as more women entered employment and tax revenues increased thereby increasing western national GDPs. What's not to like?
The key to understanding the process comes at around 0:16...technological progress...techs that reduced farm labor needs and led to more jobs available outside of the home-farm-homestead, jobs often better suited to females, or at least not so well-suited to men, and then there was birth control, and then there were household appliances. We humans keep "progressing" with technology, doing experiments whose full consequences we never foresee or even when we may foresee some that may be negative, we just brush them aside in the name of "progress" the promise of ever more "godlike" scientific-technological power-control. We are now (with AI and robotics and social-psych control techs) going way beyond just feminism and its undesired consequences and heading fully toward transforming humans into transhuman borg, heading even toward our own replacement/destruction by our beloved technological "progress".
And transhumanism is next
@@LoveQuestWithLisaConcepcion That's right! That's the trajectory we're following, but maybe we'll be saved from that also by the trajectory we're following with failing to quickly-enough transition to earth-resource sustainable modern economics, or by a rebellion of the sub-elites against the elites followed by anarchy, and other possibilities as well. Transhumanistic borgification is where the elites want to take us but will basic economic conditions enable the process to reach completion and will the rest of us follow along?
James 1:14-16
When lust ( for power) has conceived, it births sin. Sin, when it is full grown, brings death.
I can give you a short history of feminism. 1. Lies 2. Lies 3. Lies
It is an big wave , thank you for tolerance of my learning; where racism originates and they use anger -of -men ,to attack their opponents or envy of feminism.
Power of rebellious wrongful women .
Also, they target mums and single women.
The Queen's Chaplain explaining feminism? Tune in tomorrow for Putin explaining the 1st amendment.
Gender and sexuality are not the same thing. We need to listen both to scientists,AND leaders of the main religions on this. Also equality and sameness are not the same thing. I am equal to men in my eyes and God’s, but I am very different from men! However at nearly 90 I agree with my Suffragist vicar’s wife grandmother who had six children and knew she as a woman! +
"Everyone" were not in favor of the vote. False.
Can you elaborate
@@AggregateUser Are you asking me because you know nothing of the actual history, or to make some some annoying political statement?
Most crucially, majority of women weee not in favour of voting rights for women. That’s because the price to pay for that was general draft. In the end, the women’s right to vote set a precedent for unearned privilege. Suffragettes were all upper / upper-middle class; working and lower-middle class women were staunchly against it. It was, at the heart, a class issue (and still is). Also, let’s not forget the campaign of terror enacted by Suffragettes. How many postmen were killed and maimed by postbox bombs?
Looking at the way our society has literally rotted from the inside, I am not convinced granting women (again, unearned) voting rights was a smart move.
@@fifthpint4571 💯
@@fifthpint4571 Fear of women is hysterical.
"TRUE FEELINGS." NONSENSE.
The vikings had i right. Look it up.
SA Aust. 1894 BUT and wait for it NZ gave women the right to vote in 1893.
“here’s the history of feminism, from someone who is not a feminist”
Hun wake up. Feminism is a PsyOp. Women are learning facts of how we were all manipulated and by whom. I suggest researching eugenics and Rockefeller
@Tyrantstorm - He was a feminist.
Maybe a bloke's not the best person to ask to define feminism?
1- mischaracterises the waves: we're currently in fourth wave
2- there's a lot of disagreement within feminism about gender, just ask JK Rowling
3- first wave wasn't embraced all that quickly, women have the vote a long time in some countries but men had had the vote a lot longer, and men are still overrepresented at every level of the political system
4- unfair description of second wave: why shouldn't fathers look after their children if women work?
5- irrelevant description of "gender struggles". We're discussing society not couples falling in love.
I'll leave it there for now...
Lolllllllll
Why not just have men staying at home to raise the kids?
Because it defies nature and nature's God.
I think it's a bit silly to have a man's opinion of women without a woman's voice being included.
I as a woman have walked the feminism road and the pioneering road in the ecclesia in a Biblical sense. Can confidently say both men and women need to appreciate each other and learn how to honor one another as Jesus said to. 😢
Are women suitable for something other than this haha
@@leebacon-butler6130Unfortunately that doesn’t get any clicks and for some reason a lot of extremists get audiences and views then the balanced folks get called indecisive.
@@justchilling704feminists themselves are sexists bigoted people.
Why is he talking about feminism, particularly as his facts are all wrong? It certainly did not take a short time for women to achieve the vote - more like 90 years of campaigning and struggle in this country (the UK). I particularly take issue with everything he said about third wave feminism - what he describes is pure fantasy in his own head; moreover his "analysis" completely ignores the basic issue of power dynamics and imbalances inhererent in patriarchy. What gives him the right to pontificate publicly about something so important that he clearly knows nothing about. Why not get a woman to describe feminism?