I was really enjoying this story, hearing about how it is completely different from tour de france in spectators and support, and putting myself in their shoes and going through immensely arduous journey completely alone and self sufficient. Until I was very confused hearing they had loved ones checking in on them constantly, which to me completely defeated all of the intensity in listening. Emotional and moral support, like a giant safety net. I absolutely acknowledge the difficulty in completion and do not discredit that aspect, tremendously well done, but damn if it isn't a different sport at that point. I'm entirely on the organizers side even before I heard there was a rule about it. Also, false equivalence of the podcast presenter joining a very intense sport as a untrained amateur, also not alone, and saying it is hard. Yes of course it is.
Long story short; -Woman goes on long bike trip through wilderness to beat time record. -Her wife follows along in a car and takes pictures and talks to her several times a day. -Guy in charge of record keeping says it doesn't count because rules specifically state you can't have a loved on check on you. -Woman and wife are upset that she wasn't allowed to ignore that rule because she thinks it's not a good rule. -Scientist agrees that not feeling alone can SOMETIMES give you a physical advantage for strenuous activities. -Woman will be doing bike racing again without her wife checking in on her.
You can't redefine already defined rules. And to say that emotional support doesn't give you a physical advantage is a luxury that only people who've never been truly lonely have. "
Why do we have rules? As an example...and this is about law....stealing is unlawful. Yet, if my children are starving...I will steal food for them....knowing that if I got caught. I would have to pay for breaking the law even though the greater good is feeding my children. That's a lady was given a friendly warning....and she chose to break the rules. If you want to race a contest by your own rules. Create your own contest.
Youre imagining things, part of a mass hallucination, we dont have rules/laws...... All laws are there only for those stupid enough to believe in, and follow them....all government is terrorism, even democracy, where one group, violently forces its fictional beliefs on non believers. If these beliefs were true, they would apply weather you believe or not, weather you like them or not, with out the force of violence. Terrorism cant dictate what is or not reality, no matter how violent someone gets, not even if they name their beliefs "The Law". Break any and all laws, its your right, its called freedom, we have no obligation to be victims, no exception.
Speedrunning community in videogames often have special categories such as glitchless etc. If lael doesn't like the rules she should create her own category.
There were rules to the competition and not only did she break them but she was warned that she would be disqualified if she continued what she was doing..... thats bs man i fully agree with her DQ. Who does she think she is that she can just change the rules to what ever you want. The emotional support is def an advantage.
Knowingly breaks existing rules, is given a special opportunity to stop but refuses, cries to have them retroactively changed, then accuses the director of being anti-feminist. Yes, what an inspiration for queer female athletes, iconic 🤦♂️
I mean, what more do you want from her? She thought it was a dumb rule and that it wouldn't matter. She was wrong. She's moving on and trying the same thing again without breaking said rule. What's your problem?
@@GlacialScion “she thought it was a dumb rule and it wouldn’t matter.” Using that kind of excuse then acting entitled and outraged is exactly my point. My problem is that they’re positioning this sort of classless, childish attitude as some sort of victimized heroism and it’s garbage. She’s an immature cheater, period.
i would assume most listeners are mature enough to handle graphic language but it's still proper to have a warning. not sure why this is so "ridiculous" to you. and they absolutely should not censor their work.
I was really enjoying this story, hearing about how it is completely different from tour de france in spectators and support, and putting myself in their shoes and going through immensely arduous journey completely alone and self sufficient. Until I was very confused hearing they had loved ones checking in on them constantly, which to me completely defeated all of the intensity in listening. Emotional and moral support, like a giant safety net. I absolutely acknowledge the difficulty in completion and do not discredit that aspect, tremendously well done, but damn if it isn't a different sport at that point. I'm entirely on the organizers side even before I heard there was a rule about it.
Also, false equivalence of the podcast presenter joining a very intense sport as a untrained amateur, also not alone, and saying it is hard. Yes of course it is.
Long story short;
-Woman goes on long bike trip through wilderness to beat time record.
-Her wife follows along in a car and takes pictures and talks to her several times a day.
-Guy in charge of record keeping says it doesn't count because rules specifically state you can't have a loved on check on you.
-Woman and wife are upset that she wasn't allowed to ignore that rule because she thinks it's not a good rule.
-Scientist agrees that not feeling alone can SOMETIMES give you a physical advantage for strenuous activities.
-Woman will be doing bike racing again without her wife checking in on her.
It's about the journey not the destination.
You can't redefine already defined rules. And to say that emotional support doesn't give you a physical advantage is a luxury that only people who've never been truly lonely have.
"
Why do we have rules? As an example...and this is about law....stealing is unlawful. Yet, if my children are starving...I will steal food for them....knowing that if I got caught. I would have to pay for breaking the law even though the greater good is feeding my children. That's a lady was given a friendly warning....and she chose to break the rules. If you want to race a contest by your own rules. Create your own contest.
😮 4:30 😢o 😢😮
Youre imagining things, part of a mass hallucination, we dont have rules/laws...... All laws are there only for those stupid enough to believe in, and follow them....all government is terrorism, even democracy, where one group, violently forces its fictional beliefs on non believers. If these beliefs were true, they would apply weather you believe or not, weather you like them or not, with out the force of violence. Terrorism cant dictate what is or not reality, no matter how violent someone gets, not even if they name their beliefs "The Law". Break any and all laws, its your right, its called freedom, we have no obligation to be victims, no exception.
Speedrunning community in videogames often have special categories such as glitchless etc. If lael doesn't like the rules she should create her own category.
There were rules to the competition and not only did she break them but she was warned that she would be disqualified if she continued what she was doing..... thats bs man i fully agree with her DQ. Who does she think she is that she can just change the rules to what ever you want. The emotional support is def an advantage.
Knowingly breaks existing rules, is given a special opportunity to stop but refuses, cries to have them retroactively changed, then accuses the director of being anti-feminist. Yes, what an inspiration for queer female athletes, iconic 🤦♂️
I mean, what more do you want from her? She thought it was a dumb rule and that it wouldn't matter. She was wrong. She's moving on and trying the same thing again without breaking said rule. What's your problem?
@@GlacialScion “she thought it was a dumb rule and it wouldn’t matter.” Using that kind of excuse then acting entitled and outraged is exactly my point. My problem is that they’re positioning this sort of classless, childish attitude as some sort of victimized heroism and it’s garbage. She’s an immature cheater, period.
@@justinfeemster2023
Did you just not finish the episode?
@@GlacialScion No, I got so fed up with the idolization of someone acting like an entitled child I turned it off 3/4th of the way through.
@@justinfeemster2023
If you finished it, you might understand my confusion.
If it contains graphic language then do your job and censor it.. fools.
I'm unsubbing. This has become ridiculous
??
i would assume most listeners are mature enough to handle graphic language but it's still proper to have a warning. not sure why this is so "ridiculous" to you. and they absolutely should not censor their work.
yeah no one needs your warning about "graphic language"....... no one has ever been killed, hurt, or otherwise endangered by hearing words.