Hello, great content, I am glad that I can delve into and gain experience based on your videos, since I am a beginner and there is not much time to sort out my mistakes and delve from personal experience into the process of setting up the ECU, I am always glad to your content!!!
@@AaronONeal1 I personally work with a lot of different standalones so no particular ecu. Your theory and how you do it will be great to learn from 😊I'd like to know if you aim for the same or a leaner AFR target on Pump fuel with water/meth.
I don´t get how you have this base duty table or attempting to lower the duty cycle. The X axis is boost target not current MAP, so since you are in control of the target the higher boost targets never get used and so it´s value doesn´t matter.
If I'm following what you are commenting on it can still get in a feedback error loop and generate big waves in the boost. Being in control and it doing what you hope don't always coincide so it's more a safety net l guess than anything. Cars with a 4 port or some 3 ports can be very touchy on the hz and PID settings as an example. You are correct that it should be a null point on this being target rather than actual manifold pressure. It's more illustrated this way for tuners that may not fully grasp the power of their ECU and be open loop or have map as the axis.
@@AaronONeal1 What I mean is the table in question can´t get into a feedback loop unless somewhere else the calibration is wrong and the target is fluctuating. When there is no fluctuating target there is never a case where the table pushes you into overboosting.
Hello, great content, I am glad that I can delve into and gain experience based on your videos, since I am a beginner and there is not much time to sort out my mistakes and delve from personal experience into the process of setting up the ECU, I am always glad to your content!!!
I appreciate you sharing all these ideas with us. Looking forward to other informative videos 👍
Welcome, I'm glad that they are helpful.
@@AaronONeal1 Can you do a video on how you tune water/meth injection? What you do in terms of fueling, timing and so?
@@dre__breezy that's a great idea, what ECU? Or just the general theory behind why I do what I do?
@@AaronONeal1 I personally work with a lot of different standalones so no particular ecu. Your theory and how you do it will be great to learn from 😊I'd like to know if you aim for the same or a leaner AFR target on Pump fuel with water/meth.
I don´t get how you have this base duty table or attempting to lower the duty cycle. The X axis is boost target not current MAP, so since you are in control of the target the higher boost targets never get used and so it´s value doesn´t matter.
If I'm following what you are commenting on it can still get in a feedback error loop and generate big waves in the boost. Being in control and it doing what you hope don't always coincide so it's more a safety net l guess than anything. Cars with a 4 port or some 3 ports can be very touchy on the hz and PID settings as an example. You are correct that it should be a null point on this being target rather than actual manifold pressure. It's more illustrated this way for tuners that may not fully grasp the power of their ECU and be open loop or have map as the axis.
@@AaronONeal1 What I mean is the table in question can´t get into a feedback loop unless somewhere else the calibration is wrong and the target is fluctuating. When there is no fluctuating target there is never a case where the table pushes you into overboosting.