For a German language test it is quite good, there are more or less only told facts and no bashing against Italian cars (except the front wheel drive). But maybe this comes from the original test which must be from France, because of the black/silver "number plates" and the yellow headlights. I would like to listen to the test of the German and the Citroen XM in that test ;-)
They have the same opportunity but one isn't and that is SAAB because GM owned SAAB from the late 1980's to the 2000's and on 2012, they discontinue to brand which caused an end to the domineering spirit in a number of Mainland European automakers many years later... Fiat took over Chrysler in 2009 then finalized its alliance in 2013-2014 to present thus with Volvo and Renault being the only two "Mainland European" automakers to be taken over by a number of Asian (Chinese and Japanese) automakers, Fiat will be next to be taken over by some Chinese automaker or even in my choice, Hyundai-Kia and become the one of the Korean automakers to take over some "Mainland European" automaker as well...
In fact, Fiat was taken over, but by Peugeot. The models are all old and for now nothing is in sight: only a new model for Alfa Romeo, which sells less than the new Cupra brand. Ten years, and only the suppliers of German brands will remain of the Italian automotive industry (yes, many German brands have Italian suppliers)
@@TheOnlyVistosi I think so, as given by what you said that I also know with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) already merged with Peugeot and formed Stellantis in turn, I think as we notice that neither Alfa Romeo nor the rest of the former Fiat +Chrysler Group, e.g. Lancia, Maserati, Dodge/Ram, Chrysler, Jeep, are were doing well following that event. And with Stellantis - aside from Peugeot - already have Opel/Vauxhall, and Citroen/DS however, therefore with an automotive conglomerate that already lacks room - like Stellantis - may just need to lose its weight perhaps, maybe by having Peugeot jettison - I mean push - the Fiat Chrysler division into bankruptcy like it (Peugeot) did with Chrysler Europe in 1978 - where PSA (later Peugeot) bought Chrysler Europe until the latter went out of business the following years (1979). Especially that scenario (on this timeline/OTL) led to Peugeot gaining access from the British market since the UK was the selected home for Chrysler's European division. The difference between Cupra - SEAT's sub-division - and Alfa is that its no surprise that Fiat, which supplied parts to SEAT until the latter was sold to Volkswagen in 1986, also bought and owned Alfa from the Italian state in the same year VW acquired SEAT. Because of this Volkswagen didn't have much control in the Spanish market so therefore V-Dub guys in turn took control of the SEAT brand similar to how VW did with Skoda many years later, which led to VW gaining a foothold in the Eastern European market while making the Czech marque as VW's budget-oriented label like SEAT - so the answer is that Alfa and Lancia didn't have much time nor money to reshuffle its lineup to being identical to that of Fiat. Just as when Fiat then made a partnership with General Motors before that it didn't help both marques either. And in conclusion, the only thing why I were the one who fantasised the idea of Hyundai buying Fiat Chrysler during the time I made that comment above, hence it was back in 2018, because given that Ford - Chrysler's fellow compatriot and one of the companies that Lee Iacocca headed - were interested in dealing with VW during that period (mostly OTL), Marchionne in turn had interest with luring Fiat for a partnership with Hyundai because in my knowledge I think FCA would have used Hyundai to expand and thus gain access to the latter's strong market presence in the Australian and New Zealand markets - since neither Fiat nor Chrysler (hence the Jeep brand) made much footing in the Antipodes not because of the corporate behiavour of those brands. (But also when the possibility of Hyundai-Fiat - so Kia with an F and a T - cooperation went scrubbed meant I realise that it may end up in jeopardy similar to when Nissan were maintaining its partnership with Renault at the same time, that was also because it wouldn't made any sense for an Asian-European carmaking cooperation than Asian-American nor Japanese-Japanese, maybe it would have been safe for Renault to sell Nissan to Toyota and suggest that Toyota's current partnerships with Suzuki, Subaru, Mazda and Subaru were the factors why Asian-Asian/Japan-Japan automotive cooperations are were good then...)
For a German language test it is quite good, there are more or less only told facts and no bashing against Italian cars (except the front wheel drive).
But maybe this comes from the original test which must be from France, because of the black/silver "number plates" and the yellow headlights.
I would like to listen to the test of the German and the Citroen XM in that test ;-)
La Thema turbo 16 era un 4 cilindri in linea derivato dalla delta integrale... Non un v6 🤦♂️
Dal 1984,anno dell'uscita, fino al 1987, poteva disporre di un V6 da 2459 cc, di origine PRV
Bellissime auto!! Adesso invece...
no 2,8 v6....but this is thema turbo 16v 205cv 237km-h o-100 in 7sec...
4 Nice cars
Jaaaavooool viele spass
They have the same opportunity but one isn't and that is SAAB because GM owned SAAB from the late 1980's to the 2000's and on 2012, they discontinue to brand which caused an end to the domineering spirit in a number of Mainland European automakers many years later... Fiat took over Chrysler in 2009 then finalized its alliance in 2013-2014 to present thus with Volvo and Renault being the only two "Mainland European" automakers to be taken over by a number of Asian (Chinese and Japanese) automakers, Fiat will be next to be taken over by some Chinese automaker or even in my choice, Hyundai-Kia and become the one of the Korean automakers to take over some "Mainland European" automaker as well...
In fact, Fiat was taken over, but by Peugeot.
The models are all old and for now nothing is in sight: only a new model for Alfa Romeo, which sells less than the new Cupra brand.
Ten years, and only the suppliers of German brands will remain of the Italian automotive industry (yes, many German brands have Italian suppliers)
@@TheOnlyVistosi I think so, as given by what you said that I also know with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) already merged with Peugeot and formed Stellantis in turn, I think as we notice that neither Alfa Romeo nor the rest of the former Fiat +Chrysler Group, e.g. Lancia, Maserati, Dodge/Ram, Chrysler, Jeep, are were doing well following that event.
And with Stellantis - aside from Peugeot - already have Opel/Vauxhall, and Citroen/DS however, therefore with an automotive conglomerate that already lacks room - like Stellantis - may just need to lose its weight perhaps, maybe by having Peugeot jettison - I mean push - the Fiat Chrysler division into bankruptcy like it (Peugeot) did with Chrysler Europe in 1978 - where PSA (later Peugeot) bought Chrysler Europe until the latter went out of business the following years (1979). Especially that scenario (on this timeline/OTL) led to Peugeot gaining access from the British market since the UK was the selected home for Chrysler's European division.
The difference between Cupra - SEAT's sub-division - and Alfa is that its no surprise that Fiat, which supplied parts to SEAT until the latter was sold to Volkswagen in 1986, also bought and owned Alfa from the Italian state in the same year VW acquired SEAT. Because of this Volkswagen didn't have much control in the Spanish market so therefore V-Dub guys in turn took control of the SEAT brand similar to how VW did with Skoda many years later, which led to VW gaining a foothold in the Eastern European market while making the Czech marque as VW's budget-oriented label like SEAT - so the answer is that Alfa and Lancia didn't have much time nor money to reshuffle its lineup to being identical to that of Fiat. Just as when Fiat then made a partnership with General Motors before that it didn't help both marques either.
And in conclusion, the only thing why I were the one who fantasised the idea of Hyundai buying Fiat Chrysler during the time I made that comment above, hence it was back in 2018, because given that Ford - Chrysler's fellow compatriot and one of the companies that Lee Iacocca headed - were interested in dealing with VW during that period (mostly OTL), Marchionne in turn had interest with luring Fiat for a partnership with Hyundai because in my knowledge I think FCA would have used Hyundai to expand and thus gain access to the latter's strong market presence in the Australian and New Zealand markets - since neither Fiat nor Chrysler (hence the Jeep brand) made much footing in the Antipodes not because of the corporate behiavour of those brands. (But also when the possibility of Hyundai-Fiat - so Kia with an F and a T - cooperation went scrubbed meant I realise that it may end up in jeopardy similar to when Nissan were maintaining its partnership with Renault at the same time, that was also because it wouldn't made any sense for an Asian-European carmaking cooperation than Asian-American nor Japanese-Japanese, maybe it would have been safe for Renault to sell Nissan to Toyota and suggest that Toyota's current partnerships with Suzuki, Subaru, Mazda and Subaru were the factors why Asian-Asian/Japan-Japan automotive cooperations are were good then...)
Bellissime auto!! Adesso invece...