The Most Satisfying Model 1887 Gameplay in The Finals
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Thanks for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video!
If you're interested in any of my other game content please free to check out my socials.
X/Twitter: / sanguinenighttv
Twitch: / sanguinenightstv
Reddit: / sanguinenightstv
Discord: / discord
TikTok: / sanguinenightstv
FB.GG: www.facebook.c...
Business inquiries can be addressed at:
SanguineNightsTV@gmail.com
This is the only content worth watching on The Finals rn for me, makes me want to jump in a match myself.
"We should should have a semi auto sniper"
*our sniper at home*
Love to watch your vids and especially your streams, hope you have a great time. Looking forward to catching you live again. 😁
Also seeing your 1887 Gameplay made me test that gun out myself, gonna have a great time when I get a new PC with the FPS that necessary so I can hit more shots xD
Little fun fact your teammate
BaumstammTTV means tree trunk/log in German
@@SRuda the more you know. I had no clue.
@@SanguineNightsTV The power of being German hehe
true title
You are the best, bro. I don't understand how you can play without crosshair...
He's using a third party crosshair which makes aiming easier. You don't see it. You don't see his crosshair because he sets the transparency to 100% in order to not be distracted by the annoying default crosshair
@@pubwinner7867 pretty much on the money. Can't use the in game crosshair as it is a painful trigger for my astigmatism. Hopefully they implement something more accessible to other demographics. Hell, Apex's crosshairs are D tier, but they're still better than The Finals imo.
@@SanguineNightsTV I have no idea why the finals does this either
Why having the gun spin is so important? I got the new skin, and I think that the sights being pay to win is better than having it spin. It is also a bit shorter than the standard m1887, so it is comparable to the dough wrangler (probably misspelled that).
Honestly, im used to the dough wrangler spin because I time my shots better. Its a much more visual representation of when the guns cocked and ready (plus it just feels cooler)
@@ioakimmuntean6404 Jason has the response I'd give.
@@jasondemauro6954 I agree, when you start to main the m1887 the spin is just pay to win at its finest and anyone should get it. But after playing more than 300 hours of it I have the timing in my muscle memory, so the spin isnt really that useful anymore. I do agree on the cool part tho. Too bad embark isnt making more m1887 skins without the stock so that the gun can spin. Maybe they will do something similar in the weapon animation packs they will realse for the m1887 ( which is likely to happen as they realesed some for other guns) so that you can have all skins spin. It would be a bit goofy tho.
no crosshair?
They’re using a third party one instead. Which is bannable :p
Above user is correct in me using an external crosshair but incorrect in the fact that they are not bannable. That is simply a rumor spread amongst those who don't know any better. I'll give you the copypasta.
Actually I use Crosshair X, and am very open about it. This game's crosshair is sadly not accessible to all demographics as it can cause real world problems like pain, nausea, etc. Unfortunately, I belong to the demographic to which it causes pain towards.
"Unfortunately for me, I have ADD and astigmatism. The constant moving of the in-game crosshair is a very quick trigger for migraines thus causing me real world issues. The day the developers implement an accessible crosshair that is static, unintrusive, and that is not pain inducing for me, is the day I won't use an external crosshair."
@@SanguineNightsTV Embark themselves have announced:
“This includes all 3rd party software and hardware that in any way gives you an unfair advantage … This includes overlays that alter the gameplay experience beyond what is intended” in regard to bannable behaviour. This definitely sounds like 3rd party crosshair overlays are included. I am not making any point about whether this is right or wrong, this is just what they have said.
One of their community managers has also made it clear on the discord specifically that third party crosshairs are against terms of service and so bannable.
@@whwhwhhwhhhwhdldkjdsnsjsks6544 And as somebody who has done a video topic regarding this and been very vocal in their discord about the subject, I can assure you it's not bannable. Though, I would not recommend using one unless being used in the case of accessibility.
The fact of the matter is these programs (that don't alter the game/files) like Crosshair X are whitelisted in the EAC. Not to mention, but there is 0 mention of this in the ToS or anti-cheat. It's only mentioned on discord in a vague message. External crosshairs, as they stand, are only frowned upon as cheating if used to garner an advantage.
@@SanguineNightsTV If Embark representatives have deliberately stated it is a bannable offence, then it is, no mental gymnastics changes that: from the terms of service - “third-party software that may modify, temporarily or permanently, the code or the user experience of the Services” is bannable and that objectively includes third party crosshairs, whose entire purpose is to alter the user experience to their preference. They additionally reserve the right to ban you for any or no reason at their discretion; even were it not for the previous clause it would be bannable if embark wanted it to be.
I did watch the entirety of your video to see your stance, but I must say it seems rather poorly formed to me. Firstly in that using the anticheat as evidence doesn’t really make sense, it’s not as though that’s Embark’s software, it’s just a service they’ve contracted, their stance is irrelevant. And secondly in that you tried to use hardware differences to justify differences in crosshairs, which seems silly because not only is hardware utterly impractical to restrict, more importantly the existence of one inequality does nothing to justify additional inequalities - it just reads as logically incoherent to me. You also alluded to the impact of the crosshair in relation to the impact that can be caused from hardware differences, which is a null point as the magnitude of the issue doesn’t affect the ethical side of it, only how important the issue is in general. You even spoke as though banning custom crosshairs somehow implied less of a developer focus on hardware equity, which is just nonsense.
I haven’t heard of a confirmed case of someone actually being banned for using a third party crosshair, so it’s probably fine; the point I am making is that you *can* be banned for it. I agree with your personal reasons for doing so as it does sound important to you.