Cyberpunk 2077 | RTX 3080 Benchmark with the FSR 3.0 Frame Generation MOD

The FSR 3.0 Frame Generation mod by Nukem9 is one of the greatest things to happen in 2023 by far for us PC gamers. Frame Generation, once exclusive to RTX 4xxx owners, is now a thing for - almost - everyone (RTX 2xxx and 3xxx only for this mod). After playing around with the mod for a while, I decided to say goodbye to my 65% power threshold, take the side panel off, and enjoy full 320W of Cyberpunky frame generated action (along with testing different DLSS settings to find the optimal one).
I did find the ideal setting eventually, which takes us to the next video.
My rig:
32 GB RAM
Ryzen 7 3700X
Nvidia RTX 3080

[@Ghostbadii]

What resolution?

[@ArturAraripe]

1440p. The results are a bit below what it should actually be because of a glitch with the mod/game where if you change the graphics settings too much, the frames kinda take a nosedive and never quite return to normal.

[@Helifax19]

What is the PC latency? I bet it's twice...

[@ArturAraripe]

there's a bit of latency, but it's not twice, no

[@ishdemon_]

yeah its twice..whatever input you pressed is getting registered on the next real frame...not in the fake generated frame that is inserted in between..it shud be exactly twice..and reflex is on by default but still feels sluggish...i actually removed this mod & now only using the Path tracing mod with DLSS quality @1440p getting around 60 fps...which is absolutely fine & its butter responsive...imo whats the point of having more fake frames if the response time is gonna increase

[@smoosh6862]

@@ishdemon_ I disabled it too. IMO FG is useless unless you got atleast 60 native frames. I got around 90 with DLSS and with FG it caps at 144 with noticeable lag...

[@azorees7259]

You know what strange .. this guy is on a 3080 on 4k playing cyberpunk at over 40 - 50FPS ( czcams.com/video/WYoaXxYW7Dk/video.html ) so i would say either that mod is giving false results or your system is goosed,

[@ArturAraripe]

czcams.com/video/h7b_d_dwmiA/video.html yea the results glitched bc i meddled with the settings way too much. If you don't meddle with them, you get better performance.

[@ArturAraripe]

That video I linked uses the same settings from this one and you can see it averages at least 20 more fps

[@ishdemon_]

@azorees7259 The video you linked is one with 1.6 patch...i used to play native -1440P with raytracing and still used to get 60 fps before 2.0..after 2.0 they released new system requirements..any benchmark videos older than 2 months is useless now.