Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke (BSL-interpreted)

Watch this film without British Sign Language interpretation at • Pragmatic solutions to...
Authors of the World Stroke Organization-The Lancet Neurology Commission discuss barriers to stroke surveillance, prevention, acute care, and rehabilitation, and outline their implementation recommendations.
Read the full Commission here: www.thelancet....
Visit The Lancet Neurology at www.thelancet....
Find out more at www.thelancet....
Featured in this film are:
Dr Muideen T Olaiya, PhD
Stroke and Ageing Research Group
Monash University, Australia
Assoc Prof Seana Gall
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
University of Tasmania, Australia
Prof Valery L Feigin, MD, PhD, FRSNZ
National Institute for Stroke & Applied Neurosciences
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
Co-Chair, Steering Committee
World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission
Dr Sheila Martins
UFRGS/HCPA/Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Brazil
World Stroke Organization President
Prof Mayowa Owolabi
University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Co-Chair, Steering Committee
World Stroke Organization-Lancet Neurology Commission
Dr Jeyaraj D Pandian
Professor of Neurology and Dean
Christian Medical College Ludhiana, India
President Elect, World Stroke Organization
Dr Bo Norrving
Senior Professor in Neurology
Lund University, Sweden
* * *
Additional stock footage courtesy of the National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences (NISAN), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
* * *
Continue this conversation on social! Follow us today at…
/ thelancet
/ thelancetgroup
/ thelancetmedicaljournal
/ the-lancet
* * *
BSL interpretation by Involve Interpreter, involveinterpr...

[@coolmagoolsnexus]

A pragmatic way to reduce stroke would have been to not mandate mRNA or adenoviral vector injections (because they aren't vaccines). However, to do this AHPRA, the TGA, ATAGI, the federal and state governments, and Academia (including the academic journals - looking at you The Lancet) would had to have been honest, fully informed on all the evidence, have started from the known and established principles and knowledge on human immunity and the immune system, not restrict the speech of leading local and international experts who disagreed with a Globalist sociopolitical narrative, and upheld the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki.