[Slow motion] 166Hz vs 144Hz vs 120Hz vs 100Hz vs 85Hz vs 60Hz - Monitor refresh rates
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- Display used: LG 34UC89G-B
Recorded with Sony RX10 II
Review: wasd.ro/hardwa...
❤️Pentru a ramane conectat la video-urile WASD aboneaza-te la: bit.ly/34z8CFi
📣Reducere la orice de pe PC Garage cu codul de Voucher: MTJ9UUUU
🎥Video: WORKHORSE
Scrie-mi la adresa:
►fulger@wasd.ro
Social:
►Instagram: / wasd.ro
►Twitter: / wasdro
►Facebook: / wasd.ro
#wasd #wasdro #fulger
Meanwhile:- Me telling my dad to buy me a 144Hz monitor
Dad:- What will happen then?
Me:- My car will speed up !
Thank God I have a 16k 1000hz monitor
nahh, mine better. i have 420k 6969hz monitor and one hot girlfriend
@@TheRelaxingLion420
its speed more than live😹
@@TheRelaxingLion420 nah mines is better, I got 690k with 1.5 million hz
Well y’all got thrash monitor mines basically a nuclear power reactor, with over 100000sextillion hz and a life span of 1 nano second
Nah I have 16z 1000hz with no display
Apparently 85 FPS looks so much better than 60 lol. Honestly I think 100+ FPS is already smooth enough for most competitive games.
Been using 60 my whole life, just upgraded to 100, feels sooo good. I cant turn back (I have a 165hz monitor, but GPU cant support it)
LOL same here. My TV is 120Hz and my RTX 3080 can't always push 120 at 4K in BFV so i cap at 100Hz.I am sure 144 or 240 etc are better but the 60 to 100 jump is really nice as a life long 60fps gamer!
@@honey-fe6pj man i played with a 165hz monitor (whitout knowing) but my pc was able to get like 30fps, i got a new one and got shocked that i had a 165hz monitor xD
@@honey-fe6pj I played on a crappy 60 Hz (doing 20 fps on Minecraft) and im building a PC with a 165 Hz monitor
@@aatukarkkainen29 this is actually funny
Man, 100hz is gonna be a huge upgrade from 60hz I can't wait.
Também 😊😊
@@TimeIsMystery Yeh, I say it's worth it. But if your pc can get over 100 fps and you like fps shooters then 144hz is probably worth spending more. Just how big is the price difference, anyway?
I m lost. I found a 100 hz monitor ips, but on the other side, I found a 165 hrz monitor, but va anyone help
@@potsy5263 the difference is of 64 dollars. I am getting a 100hz monitor for 62.5 dollars but the double the price is 144hz and yeah my PC is capable of 100 fps . I think I should buy it because of my budget
@@The.Y.J. bruh, DONT BUT VA PANEL IF YOU WANT TO GAME
Looking to buy a new screen and your video sure helped a lot when it comes to choosing hz, thanks!
I personally tried 144hz and 165hz on asus monitor. It really do have different. 165hz better and smooth
thank you for your commentory :D
I have an asus 165hz 0,5 ms. SOOOO GOOOD
yeah boi i got the vg278q its got 165 refresh rate and 0.1 ms although i lost 100 fps cuz my game can keep up to 300 fps and i didnt got a 240 hz monitor 165 is still good af
@@7707J 0.1ms? What do you mean with that? The input lag? There is no monitor out there with less then 1ms of input lag. Only 240-360Hz monitors have around 1ms input lag.
It's the asus rog swift PG259QN with the lowest input lag out there. It's a 360hz monitor with around 1.5ms of input lag.
The pixels in my panel take about 6ms to change colour, and even though 120hz is fluid enough, I feel like 165hz does a good job when it comes to ghosting. It makes it look like per-object motion blur.
*Folks, I took off the 11 one arm pull ups* *Support me*
I think I need 240 OMG my eyes now...
144hz seems smooth enough.
no. you are blind, 60hz is better than 144hz, you just dumb and stupid. and human eyes only see 2gb ram per second
dude, why are u so dumb man wtf
@@TheRelaxingLion420 huh
Exile Galaxies that is assuming it isn’t overclocked to 4 miles per hour
RYZEN With NVIDIA Benchmarks ikr these people need to get themselves educated
@@TheRelaxingLion420 30hz is far superior. Dont even @ me
Is 100 hz good for gaming?
You don't recognize differance between 100hz and 120 hz. I'm so sure, I would go to blind tests.
An excellent comparison, well done.
I changed from 60Hz to 144Hz. Im good for the rest of my life.
@NUMB Milan OHHHHHHHH DAMN BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Do you see like a huge difference or no?
Jonah Jewell THE DIFFERENCE FROM 60 TO 144 IS *INSANE*
360hz monitor are soon to be released which means sex
@@Kromanjonac-fq2no virginity 100
When you order a 100hz monitor by accident because the only thing separating the 144hz version is one letter in the model name(and it said it would arrive 22nd-27th but it actually shipped on the 19th
Damn
Why did u test 85hz instead of 75hz? Isnt 75 much more common then 85 which you almost never see.
165hz adaptive sync? it halves it isnt it?
wow thanks for this effort.
1440p/144hz/IPS master race
You ditz check the specs next time. The monitor he used is a 2560x1080 144hz Ultrawide monitor.
wasn't commenting on his specs, "ditz"
Im looking for a 10 bit ips 1440p gsync 27" monitor. I found the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q, it's 10 bit, but it has large Quality Control problems it seems. The Acer Predator XB271HU, also QC problems (BUT LESS THAN THE ASUS) and it's only an 8 bit monitor. Do you know any monitor that meets my specs and decent QC? These are both 4ms. I would prefer 1ms. But I saw no monitor with these specs.
8DeaD7 I've got that Acer. Some people are complaining about BLB but I haven't gotten really any to mention. If you're wanting 1ms, I don't think you're going to get that in an IPS panel. TN sure, maybe VA, but I don't think those specs are a possibility with IPS @ 1440p/144hz.
i will publish input lag tests on this display as well.
check out our tests so far.
wasd.ro/hardware-reviews/3d-vga-cards/aoc-agon-ag251fz-240-hz-display-review/#comparativ-cu-alte-monitoare
120 hz seems like the sweet spot
144hz looked way smoother but for the price maybe
1080p 144mz 1ms. 24inc. All what i need.
1000hz and more is sweet spot
I might go with an ultrawide 100hz monitor
must be IPS too@@gamingtest4684
Thanks
I got eye bleed
Just kidding
Nice video BTW
3:35
2:39
Does your computer meet the hardware requirements to generate the right amount of FPS during recording?? Because you can not see it on the film !!
lol
Context of the video 120hz is minimum
the human eye can only see 5 cars
60hz sucks
John Salchichon
166hz sucks :V
@@Daniel-tv9ho 480hz master race
@@Slix i have a 480hz custom built monitor
@@Daniel-tv9ho vos hablas español a mi no me engañas xdd
@@_banana_1761 esto es por meterte con mi zona
i went from 120 to 240, and honestly it's so hard going back to anything else. after extensive use 144 will look choppier. so unless u know your only going to play 200+ fps games i wouldnt go for it :P 100-150fps in some games feels sluggish as hell when you get the feel of 240hz and what it can do
how about 165 and 240 for you now have you tried?
@@snyggmikael 165-180 isnt to bad, i'd say 165 is safe
@@Bollalillo alright thanks! I am about to purchase a new monitor and I have been back and forth, between either 240 hz (24,5 inch) and 165 hz (27 inch) you know one being TN and one IPS.. I am also reluctant picking up an IPS when seeing how much edgebleed all of the options got, in that regard the TN panel seems like a better option to be honest, what would you choose? same price. I am planning to pair it with a RTX 2080 playing Quake C, CS Go and Cod or whatever, and I have been seeing it requires a TI for it not to go under 240 fps in 1080p. So I guess it makes sense to go 165 hz knowing it probably wont hold up 240 fps anyways. But, then again not sure about going non-native in the 27 inch either, given that is a 1440p, and not sure if I even can reach a minimum of 165 fps on 1080p with a 2080? Sry long reply. answer if you want and as you please
i just wonder where do i find or which are the models about 100-120hz bcs usualy it jumps from 75 to 144 and it gets very expensive
is 85hz better than 60hz ??
yes. you want high numbers
it is basicaly same there is no big diffrence but its better
That’s like saying “is 4 dollars better than 3 dollars”
@@daddybonez I overclocked my monitor to 84hz and I can see the difference when a game defaults to 60hz. It looks like it stutters or something at 60hz. I am buying a 144hz monitor for Christmas.
ive played on a monitor 60hz for years , when i find out i can overclock it , i hit 76hz and the difference esp for me was huge ! and when i swtich to 144hz panel ..oh god trust me ill never go back to 60
I find it weird that while everything looks choppy only 60 and 120 don't have blur. I rather play on 120hz and have clarity than on 144hz and feel like I am drunk. This leaves the question if 240 doesn't has this issue my guess is no.
Just install RGB to unlock 500hz
60 to 120fps is a super major difference.
120 to 240fps is a difference.
Is 100 fine ?
no, you need 4gb ram
Looking at this i can not see a big difference from 120Hz and up. (Ordered my first >60Hz monitor last night tho)
One issue
HE DOESN'T HAVE G-SYNC
I can’t wait for my 144hz to come in now 😎😎😎
What resolution does the Sony @1000 fps capture?
and i'm sitting here with my 60Hz 5ms response time monitor that i use for gaming
5ms is nothing. The thing is, from the time you give the game a command and the time it sends the image of that command to your monitor, it can take multiple frames. If it's 3 frames at 30fps, you get 100ms+5ms, which is really sluggish. If you have 120fps, you have 30ms of lag in total, which is less than the minimum lag with a CRT (which has no latency) at 30fps.
If you are playing competitively, just desable vsync and limit the game refresh rate to a multiple of your monitor refresh rate, it's not as good, but it helps.
@@SalveMonesvol i have a 165 Hz 2ms, is It good for competitive gaming?
@@exqploit Absolutely. You can even use it with frame rete limited to 165.
Thank you.
I have a 1440p 165hz monitor
My dumb friend insist that 4K 60hz is better
depends on what you are using it for. If I spent most of my day watching netflix, I would prefer a 4k 60 over 1440 165hz. If you game then obviously the 165hz is gonna be a whole lot better.
Joshua125r well it’s a gaming monitor we’re talking about.
If you wanna watch movies that’s what TVs are for
The screen tearing is real
I'm currently in the market for a new monitor, 2 monitors have made the final cut. Both have pros/ cons the other one does or doesn't have.
However my main concern is the difference in refresh rate. The one is 100hz and the other one 144hz. If its really noticeable and worth it to go with the higher refresh rate I will but other wise I think I'm better of with the monitor that has 100hz.
Can someone give me their personal experience that owned similar monitors at both refresh rates.
Corne Van Gulik 144 is the mark to hit. Anything above 144 is almost negligible. I would def go for the 144 over the 100 though
don't go to 144, it's undistinguishable from 120 or 100. I would bet, 90% people would not find difference between 85 and 100 in blind tests. 100 is completly enough. You can find differance only from 60 to 75, or maybe 75 to 85. But not 85 to 100, or higher.
almost no big difference between 144hz and 165hz
if you have played very long time on 144hz you'll notice the difference with 165hz i bet you my head
@@HEXZ0R- Yes but the difference is very minimal, it is not as big as going from 30 to 60 or from 60 to 144
could you descripe what is better for TPS games and what FPS is better for in HZ?
Sorry, i didnt understand, if you need help, could you clearify what you are saying?
Very usefull. Thanks.
I am glad I have a TV with 0.1ms respond time!
bruv u not using free sync or g sync
I’m legit looking for 185 hz because I found a 185 hz
Should I get a 144hx monitor or 165hz?
This depends on the PC
and165hz better cuz you will pay one for long time
@@user-hm4fr4it7r i have a very good pc (ryzen 7 2700x rtx 2060 super 16gb ram etc)
@@n1ghtS69
So why are you thinking about 144
@@user-hm4fr4it7r because I am looking to buy an aoc monitor with an ergonomic stand that is 144 hz and the one that is 165hz is an msi monitor but only tilt movement
Sync fault? Your videos show 60 hz ahead in frames --- car lead
165hz looks verry smooth
If u play at normal speed 60hz its enough, if ur eyes/brain are in slow motion u need 144hz+
Test at 1:05 was the best, shows very well.
Mine is Asus Strix 34 Ultrawide 100Hz and i cannot complain.
Will I see a little bit of screen tearing in a 144hz Monitor? Just a quick question to ask.
Not if it's freesync (AMD)/ Gsync (Nvidia)
Without, you'll need to cap your fps with the refresh rate.
outSider Cain what if it is freesync and my gpu is Nvidia?
KP-48 It will still achieve 144hz, you won't be able to use freesync woth Nvidia gpu tho
I got 165hz and 0.5 ms response time size 27 monitor for 270 bucks for sale it’s worth it and I switched from 60hz to 165
ASUS Gaming VG245H 24'' , 1ms, up to 75Hz, FreeSync , EYE CARE
Can it works on gtx 1060ti g-sync
Just Donis yeah easily
A feature on the g-sync monitor and a feature that supports all graphics cards
It ended up at 50fps
Has anyone done overclock refresh rate on acer vg240y (75hz) & aoc 24g2e5 (75hz) to 90hz or higher?
Dont do it, there is a probability for it to fuck your monitor
would amd free sync improve the results?
i did a video no sync vs g-sync. check it out. i will also do one with g-sync, freesync and no sync. what results are you referring to? smoothness?
Thx for response. I think I don't understand what is better high refresh rate or fs/g-sync. I think fs/g-sync works best if you have high refresh rate monitor and gpu delivers enough fps, right?
gsync makes your eyes see the image better because it changes the actual refresh rate of the monitor to match the fps. if you have 129 fps on this monitor, the refresh will be 129hz, and when it changes to 101 fps the refresh will also go to 101 hz.
I have 240hz monitor and can notice difference 144 vs 240 even on desktop usage. Less in games actually but it's there
i did a video with 240 hz as well. check on the channel. i can see the difference too in real life. increase the fov in games and you will see where is high contrast
@Ultron placebo effect.. i had a 144hz monitor side by side with a 80hz one.. no difference noticed in games .
@Ultron well..i never played pubg or csgo..maybe that's why. Maybe you're right,but we are talking about really competitive levels..most people won't notice a big difference. from 120 ro 144hz..
@Ultron all i'm saying. You're not going to see a difference in most games ,from 80/100hz to 144hz. Most people will not notice a difference from 75hz to 100hz.
am i the only one who watch this video with 60hz monitor to see the difference.
slow motion is such a bad test, i have a 165hz screen, and while there is a smoothness improvement between 60 and 120hz, its not enough to be a big game changer, and between 120hz and the full 165hz, i really couldnt detect much of a tangible difference.. so while 165hz at full speeds does look a bit sharper in fast moving scenes and games, thats really the only thing it provides
so my advice to those considering a higher refresh rate monitor.. if you can get one within your budget, sure.. but if not, dont worry about it too much and if you dont play any fast paced games you wont benefit from it at all.. its a luxury, but at the end of the day, that's all it is
thanks for the video
I feel like 100 is the minimum and 144 the sweet spot.
Poti sa-mi recomanzii un monitor gaming bun ips gsync cu un refresh rate macar de144hz si nu mai mic de 27inch?
De fapt tu ce ai alege daca ai fii nevoit sa iei un monitor cu specificatiile de mai sus acum la sfarsit de 2017?
Ty pentru un eventual raspuns.
eu am cumparat asta: www.pccomponentes.com/benq-zowie-xl2720-27-led-144hz-esports?gclid=CjwKCAiAm7LSBRBBEiwAvL1-L27W7o_X1Zc9hLCe5Yv-mGr3LImg0eU6alteu_DrpZ-Gi7BpIXadzhoCTusQAvD_BwE BenQ ZOWIE XL2720 27" LED 144Hz eSports
E TN....eu vroiam sa stiu o parere la IPS panel,diferenta intre 4 ms si 1 ms apropae ca e insesizabila si poate fi usor depasita de skill. Ms oricum.
daca nu ai probat niciodata un TN nu ar trebui sal descarti eu credeam ca nu o sa imi placa si ca o sa se vada urat dar chiar daca te uiti din parti culorile se vad la fel trebuie sa exagerezi si sa te uiti din lateral si doar se vede mai intunecat si ce mai are rau e ca culorile nu au asa viata ca ips dar are settari si poti sal faci sa se vada ca un ips si daca il pui langa altu si probezi un joc in amandoua nai sa vezi diferenta oricum daca nu conteaza pretu sunt monitoare mai bune asta depinde de tine
Nu e nevoie sa testez pentru ca deja am avut un Acer predator de24 pe tn si orice setari am facut nu se apropia nicicum de claritatea si contrastul culorii pe ips. De asta am intrebat de un ips bun(eu ma gandeam la un Asus pg279q)dar sa vedem ce ne ofera piata monitoarelor pe 2018...
Guys i am using my monitor at 120 hertz. When I make it 165 hertz there are green dots on screen. How can i fix that? My monitor is Asus TUF 165 Hertz
It's prob not working correctly
@@aatukarkkainen29 Yes they gave me another one.
@@erayylmaz9943 Awesome!
whats the difference ? tell me pls
Better reaction times smoother frame rates ghost reduction
Thank you that there is no music... To focus on the content
You know what a mute button is?
I got my new 165hz monitor from msi im happy
1440p 165hz is the best
1440p 480hz ips ez 1 taps
Lol there is no such thing as 480hz
120 and up looks to be the spot to aim for, I'm working with 165 at 1440p and I feel like I'm set for life.
same and im on a budget i have a build for $236 lol not sure how it will run though and now looking at monitors its just hell im on a small budget (im a kid 13 years old) if you have any suggestions on a monitor you found please tell me XD thanks
75hz??
Thank God I have a 144p 2160hz monitor.
so if all of them are still jittery to me then i need a 200+ hz monitor fuck sake.
guys this wont actually tell you anything, it's maximum frame in CZcams is 60fps.
Why are you YAPPING when you don't know shit
Thats why it slow down
never heard of 166hz or 85hz in my life
Now you have, or ever heard of a spelling error? 😉👌
These are the refresh rates supported by this display and reported in windows
You can achieve 85hz by simply overclocking some 60hz monitors
Same with 166........
acer predator series have 165hz monitor
Porque em câmera lenta? Ninguém joga em câmera lenta, deveria ter um vídeo em tempo real para ver a diferença de verdade.
Mas na sua tela de 60hz vc não vai ver diferença
2:42
2:42
3:39
3:39
my monitor is 75hz and i use 80hz (overclock)
nahh bullshit, 75hz only has 2gb ram
I have a 60hz monitor and overclocked a 1280 by 720 res to 80hz. Edit: No, frame skipping.
блед. а как смотреть это видео, если у тебя всего 60 hz на мониторе ?
Lol
It's in slow motion
all that nice stuff and you using racing game as example???
we have 2 more videos with other games. check them on the channel
You have to fill the higher hz with higher frame rates otherwise high hz is useless. A racing game. especially an older one capable of high frame rate graphs to match high hz - is a pretty good example to use in order to duplicate scenes too.
Using what seems to be a dedicated benchmark racing game as a comparison actually make sense! I see where you’re coming from as if he were to have bought one for Dirt, but it’s does show the higher smoothness!
144 vs 166 placebo effect..
dam yall broke my monitor hertz is 60000 THe newest monitor invented in mars .
my monitor is a 165 hz with 1440p res
Want a cookie
@@hyuie1311 yes
From experience 60 Hz is an unacceptable number 75 Hz and above is a good experience
So much screen tearing, care to redo this and use g sync, free sync or v sync with some sort of fps target limiter, it sure is great with high fps for higher hz but with the fps jumping so much creating great tearing... 🤔
The tearing is not caused by variable framerate in this case. Anyway, I did a video like that. Look on the channel. That one is with variable framerate in the same manner on both amd and nvidia cards
Eu uso 85Hz
I dont know a166hz gaming monitor , i know 165hz gaming monitor
Looks like same to me
85 and 100hz are about the same
easy 200k and 3000hz
I have 1080p and 166hz
sure doesn't look like the game is running at 166+fps.
+TitelSinistrel was running at 300. Ultra low settings on gtx 1080
I believe he slowed it down to show the differences because on CZcams it’s only a 60FPS limit.
Game fps should be high enough to maximize the high refresh rate monitors.
I have tested Dirt 4 before, here are the videos.
czcams.com/video/NFHhclygQfY/video.html game fps 300
czcams.com/video/_1TEbRksJ8E/video.html game fps 100
the 300 fps is obviously better than the 100 fps @240hz with v-sync off.
but if with v-sync on, that's another story.
I have 165 hz 1ms
100hz is enough
from this video,looks like 80hz is more than enough..nobody will see a big difference above that.
@@miez3xeNoN Can't really judge anything by the video, you don't see in slow-motion.
@@miez3xeNoN try competitive gaming and you ll see huge difference b/w 144 and 165hz
@@insane2539 not true. Maybe marginal, but not huge for sure. Huge is between 60 and 100.
I mean 120hz is enough
240hz ftw
My 60 hz
@ 1080p50
144 good