9. Classification of Covering Spaces; Deck Transformations - Pierre Albin

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 1. 01. 2019
  • Lecture 9 of Algebraic Topology course by Pierre Albin.

Komentáře • 9

  • @sardanapale2302
    @sardanapale2302 Před 5 měsíci +2

    00:31:32 the book is Algebra and Galois theories by Adrien Douady, who was a mathematician of Grothendieck's caliber, and is behind a great deal of major mathematical results of the XXth century. You dont hear about him because his name does not appear in the articles, but he is behind a lot of Serre's results, Wiles, Yoccoz, Atiyah, Connes, Weil and Grothendieck... He had a nack for visualizing the steps conducting to the proofs of several conjectures, sharing his ideas without proving them. He has major results of his own in Complex Dynamics.

  • @TheoremsAndDreams
    @TheoremsAndDreams Před 9 měsíci

    The “topologist’s sine curve” is semi-locally simply connected but not locally simply connected (nor is it locally path-connected).
    Consider an open ball around a point within the space on the y-axis. This neighborhood is not path-connected, but any loop within the neighborhood is entirely contained either on the y-axis or in the “curvy” part of the space with positive x-coordinates, and any such loop is null-homotopic.

  • @sodamjung9808
    @sodamjung9808 Před 4 lety +2

    Nice lecture

  • @Braid_group_magduru
    @Braid_group_magduru Před 3 lety +2

    31:23 Can anyone say which book he means? I couldn't find the book by searching the name he gives.

    • @Poincare2024
      @Poincare2024 Před 3 lety +5

      Might be Galois Groups and Fundamental Groups by Szamuely

    • @vacunar7
      @vacunar7 Před 3 lety +5

      I'm pretty sure its the book by Hatcher on algebraic topology (he mentions the name in various ocations). It can be found here: pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/AT.pdf

  • @TheoremsAndDreams
    @TheoremsAndDreams Před 9 měsíci

    I think he was writing path products (path concatenation) backwards when proving the conjugacy of the subgroups induced by different basepoints. It is standard to write a path product from left to right.
    We should write:
    p2_*([gamma^-1 • a • gamma]) = [a^-1 • b^-1 • a • b • a] = p2_*([gamma])^-1 • [a] • p1_*([gamma]),
    where [f] |-> [gamma^-1 • f • gamma] is the isomorphism from pi_1(X~, x~_1) to pi_1(X~, x~_2) along the path gamma.
    In general, the map:
    [g] |-> [b • a]^-1 • [g] • [b • a] for all [g] in pi_1(X, x)
    is an inner automorphism taking H_1 to H _2.

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 Před 3 lety +1

    Injective is dual to surjective synthesizes bi-jective or isomorphism!
    Equivalence, similarity = duality.
    Duality: two equivalent descriptions of the same thing (homeomorphism) -- Leonard Susskind, physicist.