The Neurobiology of Emotion Regulation Development and the Role of the Early Environment
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 10. 2016
- Nim Tottenham, associate professor of psychology at Columbia University, gave this talk at Neurons to Neighborhoods.
Carnegie Mellon University’s BrainHub brought some of the nation’s leading early childhood development experts together with local and state policymakers and practitioners for its first Neurons to Neighborhoods community outreach event.
With funding support from The Heinz Endowments, the event was designed to help the community of early care and education providers, government officials and other specialists learn how to effectively understand the latest early brain development research and apply this evidence-based information to their everyday practice and policy-making decisions.
Learn more at www.cmu.edu/brainhub.
A dynamic speaker, very intelligent, enjoyed, enlightened g
Excellent research....Sybil Francis PhD clinical psychologist
this is interesting for children's rights
For abuse survivors scared to come out and speak up. That's what I'm working on...
It is interesting we need to fight for children's right to life, under capitalism, isn't it...
She is a great speaker.
That's your neuroception.
Thank You, so much.
Very interesting- thank you 😊
thank you
This is terrific👍
This is terrific, I would make one suggestion, steadily expanding economic inequality makes being a parent, especially a single parent very hard. Parents also need healthy environments and this economy does not provide sustainable or even steady security, in fact, zero sum goals of paying millions less than it takes to live, so a few can be mega powerful, must change for true improvement to neurodevelopment
How did I end up here from biochemitry?
Associate Professor Nim Tottenham places her sexist ideological agenda before the health of humanity's children and academia's integrity. I would not class this person as a expert in emotional development or allostatic regulation. This narcissism is not acceptable in developmental psychology, and to think she teaches people at Columbia University is a shame.
Quote 18:20 "I want to point out that there is no reason this is just about mums".
There is neuroscience evidence which shows that a mother (or other female) is the most important primary caregiver between birth and 2 years or age, for this sets up the right brain and the emotional regulatory systems of the HPA-axis.
This is at best misleading, and seems to be part of a sexist academic agenda.
Quote 28:30 " I definitely don't want people to walk away thinking that the data are supporting mums staying at home, and never leaving their children. IN FACT WE THINK parents going away and coming back routinely through the day is really important in teaching the system about the range of possible experiences the child is going to need to navigate in the future".
This is nothing but opinion and shallow speculation, yet it's been represented as supported by data - WHICH IT MOST DEFINITELY IS NOT.
What's more she is encouraging mothers to feel pride in leaving their children regardless of distressed states. This is in contradiction to years of findings from evidence-based research.
The above statements are of an academic trying to represent sexist ideological opinions as facts of scientific research.
Misleading speech such as this has to be called out when the health of humanity's children is the cost of letting such misrepresenting statements slide. The decline of our academic institutions is a secondary consideration.
Here is a video formed from the actual evidence we have gained from studies specifically into emotional development in the attachment years - not some feminist professor's thoughts on what random neuroscience facts could mean for emotional development:
czcams.com/video/a3qGZQqglGE/video.html
the psychologist Dr Judy from the show what the freud says that mothers need to stay home the feminin energy is the nourturing one it is magnetism it is what binds everything together
lifechariot boys somebody’s got a stick up their ass
You didn't watch this lol. She said at appropriate age. I think that matters
@@GIPgarden -- Watch the following video on the actual evidence we have about emotional development in the attachment years and tell me what you think:
czcams.com/video/OIEIJxOd-Co/video.html
@Adolfo Gonzalez -- Firstly, I have only recently added the video of my own channel,which in part was created to refute ideological nonsense found on the internet, so if adding a video (two years after an initial comment) to support an opinion is prejudice then perhaps your judgement is filled with a little too much suspicion - enough that one might think it's a form of projecting one's own will to deceive. Indeed if your powers of discernment were as great as you casual scorn, you would have noticed the video I linked is published over a year after my initial comment.
Secondly, I'm an evidence-based researcher who specialises in emotions, so how - and on what planet - does making and then referring to a video, which is a pure listing of the latest evidence on the subject in question, equal prejudice?
I thought that was the scientific process of peers, but perhaps you disagree and would like to state your arguments in this field?
Thirdly, all the topics covered in my video are from evidenced research in this field, so either you know very little about the aetiologies of emotional development research, or suppress evidence that conflicts with your ideological stance.
Forth, my sources are as follows and how they compare to the ideological women in this video, Nim Tottenham:
1.Dr A Schore is a Senior Neuropsychiatrist at Havard and UCLA, (His research has focused on affective neuroscience, neuropsychiatry, trauma theory, developmental psychology, attachment theory, pediatrics, infant mental health, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, and behavioral biology). Dr Schore's research is entirely about emotional development issues and has been for decades - now he is a a true expert in emotional development and neurological aetiologies of emotional dysfunctions. He is clearly decades ahead of Nim Tottenham who is by no means an expert and even looks like a novice by Dr A Schore's standards.
2. The Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth Until Adulthood:
this is my second source and indeed the 30-year-longitudinal-findings of the most eminent research in the field of childhood development. It is considered the Bible of evidenced childhood development results.
The hundreds of seminal findings from this study are the best in the field bar none. The standards of research practices are to the highest level and they cover over 10,000 variables of parent-child interactions and took dozens of experts in this field decades to put together and present.
Fifth, your comment towards me is really just a personal attack to detract from the concerns I've raised regarding Nim Tottenham consideration as an expert in this field. You have NOT listed one point of academic disagreement. You have NOT raised any point of academic debate. You have ONLY listed Nim Tottenham qualifications as evidence of her title as expert when indeed her qualifications and experience by no means, shape or form compare to the experts in this field.
Quite frankly, you don't know what your talking!
I couldnt take my eyes off her. Being so beautiful is a distraction.
Creep!
Umm... she’s beautiful...
Why do we only hear this about female speakers?