Johnny Depp trial: Amber Heard psychologist accused of not using tests properly | LiveNOW from FOX
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 05. 2022
- Dawn Hughes, the psychologist hired by Amber Heard's legal team in her defamation trial against her ex-husband Johnny Depp, faced tough questions from Depp's attorney during cross-examination. Hughes was challenged on her methods of testing and asked about using a number of tests with different parameters than how they were designed. Hughes defended her actions and said there is some leeway to use these tests in different ways.
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! czcams.com/users/livenowfox?su...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
So Dr Hughes is board certified but doesnt follow any of the manuals instructions? The board needs to decertify her.
Having followed this trial there seems to be a correlation between board certification and incompetence. Dr. Spiegel was also board certified.
What Board certified her?
Right?? And how is Dr. Curry NOT board certified but still more knowledgeable than those two quacks?
@@imaginempress3408 waterboard by amber turd
hell at this point Imma board certify myself lolol
This Dr. needs to be reported to the state where she practices.
This woman is apparently accustomed to just winging it and expecting that no-one will scrutinise her work this closely. This over-confidence and casual sloppiness shouldn't be tolerated from any medical/clinical professional.
Well said
i agree she made alot of money doing this .and no one pic it up before now untill it on tv for us to pic over.
After seeing this, would anyone recommend her to their friends and family? This is bad for anyone’s career, I’d say.
^ this
theres a difference between forensic evaluation/ what is expected within the context of a court proceeding and intent to treat in a clinical setting. she messed up because she evaluated heard by standards inscrutable in this setting given the strong interests and motivations of parties involved
"You can read the manual but can you follow the directions?" 😅😅 This lawyer is awesome. AH's expert witness is a tool.
Ouch!
Amber heard is poop
JD's attorneys: why did you administer an inadequate test without following its instructions?
AH's attorneys: you had a Moscow mule at Mr. Depp's, right?
Amber on audio: I hit you
Amber under oath: I never hit him
Why's she so combative? Like aren't you a psychologist? Just wow everyone on Amber's side is just like her
This usually happens when people are paid to lie.
devils
Birds with the same feathers flock together
Judging by her accent, she’s probably Long Island trash. Ever been there? Lovely people.
@@NedMuje amber has no money
I find it strange that a doctor is justufying using shortcuts rather than following a standard procedure to document . As a Nurse I will fill all required observation about the patient on the space provided for that variable because that is where everyone following the patients progress will read . That is standard documentation
It worries me how she presented her credentials to the jury + admits to not fill out the tests completely and reasons out that it was 'redundant' to answer the tests since it's all indicated in the 88-page report + defensively replies to the attorney.. all in one sitting..
It's similar to saying "No need to fill out all of the questions in the test even though the instruction says so.. since I have the info in my super-comprehensive-88-page-report full of words that most people do not understand and abbreviations that most people haven't heard of"..
..not everyone has the patience to read an 88-page report, not everyone understand what the heck it means.. geezuz 🤔🤔
Narcissism. She's convinced she cant be wrong.
true
@@AJAXKID123 fully agree if a health professional was pulled up in a coroner's case and they didn't have complete documentation the health profession dosnt have a leg to stand on and may look at deregistrstion or restrictions applied.
You think so wouldn’t you, I couldn’t believe she had the nerve to come back and couldn’t even admit they were wrong ans apologise for what she’s done. I’m mean she can’t call herself a professional after this and also lying on court and a witness.
Beware a psychologist who cannot be wrong, who is defensive and rigid. Maybe a little self-reflection is in order? To develop enough insight to see this? Yikes.
She is not coming off well to any jury.
So ANGRY! and YIKES is right!
Beware of anyone like this! Any person who cannot ever admit that they are wrong is bad news! Stay away from them.
Remember, she also holds the mindset that its highly unlikely in her eyes for men in a relationship to be the victim.
@@GentlemanMudkip has she said that before? That would be another bomb shell
"I asked you about the instructions"
"And I have chosen to answer a different question"
It's getting harder and harder for her to not let the mask slip. You can tell she's seething with rage at being exposed for the monster she truly is.
she wont have patients now they transferring to dr curry
Its too bad her last appearance on the stand has already come.
I was hoping for a full on Hollywood meltdown
@@jordyjohn2275 she was so close to it
@@epic1053
I was thinking Camille should have let her rant a little more
Correct
I didn't think it was possible that this woman could irritate me more than the first time she testified but, she did.
hahahhahahahah you made me laugh. The amount of irritation she provides
It’s so hard not to compare her to the other Dr. She can’t even testify without reading her notes. Dr. Curry knew absolutely everything and every test she had administered without looking at any type of notes!
Exactly she looks like one of those consultants that make the residents do everything for them lmao…too arrogant to even do the test herself that’s what I’m receiving from her 🥴🥴
Not to mention, Curry not only made it easy to understand, what she was saying fit.
She was a very beautiful intelligent woman that could stand her ground and hold her own. She was very knowledgeable and very smart. She cut them down with facts there was nothing they could do with Dr. Curry
Oh I would love to meet Dr. Curry in person. 🤝 She was knowledgeable, firm and confident in her answers. Just awesome.👏
This is why you don’t take shortcuts. It makes you look incompetent in these situations
It really makes her testing look biased when she is trying to disprove a colleagues diagnosis of the same test. 😬
Especially when 50 million dollars and johnnys reputation is on the line
She taking shortcuts because she think she knows everything?
@@bornlucky9564 BINGO!!!
I am impressed at the sheer amount of information Depp's legal team had to process just to develop a strategy for this case. How the hell did they pluck out that blurb about the test directions!!
They deliberately let Amber's team bring in liars, crooks and weirdos so that they can smash them on the stand.
I'm sure Dr Shannon Curry is consulting with Johnny's team. She's the Real Deal, unlike this lady...
I could be wrong but I think Dr. Curry was the one who pointed out all of this to his team… She was amazing in her testimony. Very well mannered and intelligent…. Unlike this lady…
The entire team is more than 16 lawyers. Most of them are in the office helping remotely.
As a Clinical Professional this really upsets me. We have clinical/ethical standards, we give our word to always work honest and intelligently and to NEVER assume and when in doubt know our limitations and seek support or education. Many forget what the term a “growing professional” means.
She states that she went on WHAT AMBER SAID.....absolutely unbelievable. AMBER lies lies lies. This so called professional is unbelievable.
@@lareeseblaque8303 you can use that for treatment but not for a legal precedent
And when you hear her say what boards and committees and w/e she's on it clicks as to _why_ .... because, regardless of what she is saying, such behaviour smacks of someone who is past their prime, sees scant, if any, direct clinical scenarios (I have no issues thinking that when she says she does "clinic hours" that she is, in fact, just auditing students or new clinicians, and claiming it under her hours as that's what happens in other medical specialities so I assume it happens in psych), someone who no longer "has the time" to keep up to date with the literature and progress in the field and who, because she is a big cheese, thinks that stuff is all beneath her. If you cannot admit your mistakes, and you instead fall back on tests and measures that are out of date by 30+ years, and you trying to aggressively browbeat not only the cross examination but the _jury_ with your confusing word salad, thinking it makes you sound impressive and believable?? Well.... let's just say I don't have my money on such incompetence, and I hope her colleagues and any superiors she has left are seeing this for what it is: someone who didn't know what they were doing, didn't read the notes, and thinks they can bluff their way thru the most intensively scrutinised civil suit this side of the year 2010.
@Victor Alcantara, can anyone report on her? She is the reason why so many innocent men been put always because there are hundreds of AH out there and I can vouch for it.
I am retired now but was a mental health professional for over twenty years, and I also found this to be very alarming and unethical. It leaves me to believe that she had a personal agenda in this case, more than likely in the form of financial gain.
I think this psychologist is in over her head. She is so defensive, which leads me to wonder how confident she is in her capacity as an "expert."
She needs to be reported, her carelessness could cause a tragic situation. She was getting big bucks from Amber to LIE!!!!!
Seriously: for someone who does this all the time, you can see she's certainly taking the cross-examination personally.
You can feel the heat from her fuming the first minute she talks.
She is so clearly biased towards women always being the victims
At all costs, dr Hughes protected Amber, and in return Amber paid dr Hughes to LIE.
In the end, they both got caught😁
“That’s the way YOU BELIEVE that you followed the instructions of standardized test”.. “YES” lol 😂
Baited so hard and she fell for the trap😂
No further questions, your honour!
Her psychologists are prime examples of what the APA needs to crack down on....making their own rules and not following procedures......HORRIBLE!
It’s weird how the psychologist didn’t follow the testing instructions nor is there any code of conduct or repercussions for her administering and making a diagnosis however she chose to do that.
And they diagnosed afar JD
and used a PAI instead of MMPI for forensics in a civil case with vested interests
A psychologist I once worked with told me that this is actually one of the biggest problems in the field: Psychologists who do not follow or even read the instructions for the tests. There are lots of different reasons to this.
She created her own answers to the test so Ambar can score much higher in the results sections. Another fraud that she fabricated to help out Amber to have PTSD
@@Manuel_Bache she should be punished for that. She fabricated all results
@@Octopussyist so if they do that the results not correct
As an engineer, if scientists and people in practice work like that lady, dismissing certain things because they seem to know better and don't need to follow rules, that's when you see bridges/buildings collapse, wires melt/cause fires or leakage. There's a reason processes are made the way they are. If you think you know better, you can go to the right places and advocate for your better solution.
Dr. Curry explained an extensive and complex analysis to determine trauma. Meanwhile, Hughes just makes arbitrary decisions and not even filling basic information properly.
But what about the muffins? 😅😂
Right!!!!!
@@Smurfyis730 and having dinner and drinks with Johnny Depp
@@JYgaming-yl2yt did you say a mule? So there wasn’t any animals present, correct? 🙄😂
This lady came out defensive and pissed at the critical comments made about her work. She was totally being Bitchy and rude. Amber's Legal team and her witnesses are always very rude..
I agree 100%... sad and childish!!!! smh
All of them they are being paid 250000 at least do a good job at lying
All of her experts and/or witnesses are exactly like AH. Deranged.
her smirking through this testimony is very telling, I think she realizes she is going to lose and doesnt care anymore
Johnny smirks too. It's ok for her to smile 🐱
Oh she cares trust me
I think she doesn’t know what ‘face’ is best to show.
@@des2knee962
Johnny is consistent.
Heard is crying one second, arrogantly smiling the next.
This is classic BPD
@@des2knee962 what is your profile pic, that an nft?
Amber's facial expressions ALONE make her the least likable person on the entire planet!
It's absurd how bad Heards "experts" are within the area of expertise, you could think the are laymen
no one actually credible would want to ruin their career
@@justhere11 haha I love how you described her. It's true!
@@justhere11 it’s not just finances. It’s also that there are few “good experts” who are willing to lie in support of fictitious BS allegations.
They look like they're out of a psych facility and have taken the identity of their actual treating doctors
It's interesting how "crazy" is paralleled between Heard, lawyers, and witnesses.
She's infuriating and should lose her licence.
Trying to wiggle herself out of this embarrasing situation , she shouldnt do that ....make her look like an absolute beginner instead of an expert
Yet I think she get paid hundreds per hour
I agree with you. She acts like an amateur.
I dont think she IS an expert.
She basically gave amber a "Do you have PTSD, yes or no" check box and then said Johnny did that.
She uses weasel language to avoid explaining what she actually did. Like when she went through and fully named every test she did, then abbreviated them so you cant tell what's what when she went into detail on only 3 of the 12 "tests"
shes a corrupt fool, psychiatry and psychology are two of the biggest BS corruption fields out there
No one will ever have to listen to her as an “expert” again at least. Not after this. Lol.
The checklists she used were designed for the past year events. Orientating a patient to another time required a different assessment tool that’s why the manual recommends using the CAPS 5. My goodness I can’t believe an expert can come across so incompetent
thanks for letting us all know!
Turd is so inappropriate , smirking and smiling to herself. she probably thinks she’s the only one that’s right and everyone else is wrong and are fools
Then today said on the stand that the hasn’t been smiling and smirking durning the trial and that she had cried on the stand…. Lies and lies and lies
@@JYgaming-yl2yt well when she's forced to file bankruptcy and loses everything that smirk will be whipped clean off her face
Was Amber not crying a sec ago 🤣🤣.. Don't worry Amber we believer Dr Curry.
Miss Hughes, have you ever heard the phrase, "If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it yourself."?
I should have been a lawyer.
Ambers awfully smirky today isn’t she. Guess she is getting too tired to hide it behind the fake sad face.
And she shamelessly says she doesn't sit in the court room smiling ot laughing and whatever🙄🤣
Or*
She can’t hide her true unhinged self forever. Johnny knew what he was doing in wanting the trial televised. She’s on full display to the Entire World!!
Johny smiles too. It's just how she is. Awful surely, but smiling or smirking can be excused
I think she knows she’s lost in the court of public opinion and is over it. It ain’t no fun when the rabbit has the ghun
She almost convinced me but thinking back on it it's like saying I don't need to write a summary because you could just read the book. She knew this would come into scrutiny so she doesn't write anything that can be judge by a ordinary person but instead refer to a stack of pages that no one other than expert would read.
Yep!!
But... much to her dismay, JD's lawyers did read the instructions. Surprise, surprise, SHE did not follow them.
But I remember and it was hard to watch was she did a lot of talking and said nothing that's what she's professionally good at.
clever, but not clever enough. probably has worked in the past. good insight
Which also means her full write up is likely nonsense. With no summary, it's the default.
If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it yourself. If she can't summarize her own extended thoughts, she's lost her self - not to mention those who are meant to interpret her thoughts.
Ben Chew watches Johnny like a concerned friend. I like Ben. I don’t know him. But I like him. A lot.
Maybe he is the one dating him, not Camille.
Like a smart Mr Bean
Johnny's Ben CHEWED up Amber's Rotten Ben and spat him out
He seems like a nice man
Me too!
Notice how she in ways she can be like Amber. She starts blinking fast when she is getting uncomfortable
Or lying.
This Woman is Dangerous Ffs imagine how many woman brought documents from her to court cases against Men for abuse ..when she doesn't even go by the rules
JD's expert witnesses are all professional and calm. AH's expert witnesses are all agressive and defensive.
Probably because they were all questioned and legal expert status challenged and then proved WRONG.
Dr Hughes conveniently ignored Amber's personal nurse's notes that she had no injuries the day she got back from Australia. Hughes misrepresented her testing, and potentially gave Amber insight into what symptoms would be associated w PTSD before testing to see if she had PTSD. Truly shameful smh
"Tell the world, Johnny, tell them, 'Johnny Depp, I, a man, I'm a victim too of domestic violence'. And see how many people believe or side with you" ....
'my dog stepped on a beeee🥴🤧
@@808nzaro lol
@@808nzaro "and now everyone's making fun of mee"
Thats going to be on a t shirt
these "experts" gonna lose their job after this
And ruined their reputation too
There reputation will be damaged but they will still have their certifications and the ability to ruin more innocent lives because in America we don't hold people accountable like we should
Where did this so-called doctor get her degree? Inside of a cereal box?
This expert cross-examination absolutely destroys this karen's credibility. This should happen a lot more often. Abusive women have been getting away with this crap for far too long.
She is such A Karen. Good call🐝👍😂
Exactly!
@P Shali That sounds about right. I have a mother-ex-law with the same attitude.
This women is more dangerous then Amber Heard
Lol. AH & Hughes went to the same school for covering up lies.
Yep!
If the static risk factors don’t change, why does Johnny have zero risk factors in previous relationships whilst Amber has previous DV, violence and abusive behaviours…?
because Johnny Depp was raised in an abusive home by his own mother and he's not the aggressor, Am💩💩IS, ITS CLEARLY NOTED THROUGH OUT MR DEPPS TESTIMONY!!
Mr Depp wanted to stay away from violent people, thats why he would always try to get away from am💩💩 but she would always try to stop him from walking away from Her violent outbursts, he was hit,punched..objects thrown at him to keep him from leaving..thats her way!! violent crazy lady pantyhose!! in otherwords coocoo for cocoa cocoa puffs!!!
Because real Johnny and Amber's imagined Johnny are not the same person.
Good point.
As I have mentioned in previous posts of mine, I am a retired psychotherapist who has administered countless psychological instruments over the years I was actively working. I had conducted psychological evaluations of many patients that were both in my care and in the care of my colleagues. The cross-examination of Hughes, PhD. was very accurate in that she didn't follow proper procedure in reviewing all test results prior to developing a concrete diagnosis. Only the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) can stand alone in developing a medical diagnosis and not the other psychological instruments that she claims to have used at the time she gave her first diagnosis. This was pre-mature on her part and clearly indicates to me that she had a preconceived opinion that went well beyond just a hypothesis that needed to be tested. She was making an actual diagnosis without the completion of all of the psychological instruments. Therefore, in my opinion, she had an agenda that was beyond medical science in deriving her findings which is unprofessional on many levels. Apparently, in my opinion, she gave the opinion that she was paid to render, rather than the opinion that the psychological instruments and her professional interviewing and assessment of Amber Heard led her to determine. I would appreciate any other mental health professionals providing their opinions on my post here and on the testimony that doctor Hughes provided.
Hello! I have a few genuine questions about the practice in relation to the video. If a patient presents themselves as possibly having PTSD in relation to IPV, but that IPV happened over a year ago, how much can that skew the results of the CAPS-V? It seems to me that the CAPS-V, in relation to asking how often a specific event happened in the prior year, is acting as less of a diagnostic instrument than it is a gauge of the extent of the IPV that occurred in the recent past. Is the CAPS-V as a whole meant to measure the estimated severity of the patient’s trauma-related symptoms at the time of administration? I wish these questions would have been asked in examination because if that is the case and were explained more thoroughly, it would have highlighted how important the other instruments’ results are when considering the results of the CAPS-V, and especially to the jury who I imagine have a very limited range of knowledge in terms of the nuances of psychiatry. I’d imagine that it could be acceptable to have a patient answer the same questions in relation to the time frame of when the IPV was occurring, but that it should definitely not be considered in the analysis of the CAPS-V’s results.
@@askmeaboutsugma You posed some well-thought-out and intelligent questions, Dylan, and I will try my best to answer them. Let me first say that I am not an expert in assessing the domestic violence of adults, but I am an expert in assessing the abuse of children and adolescents. You are correct, that the CAPS-V provides the therapist with a strong indication of the onset of the trauma, the past and current effects of the trauma on the patient, and provides the therapist with a diagnostic tool for diagnosing the patient with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) if it does, in fact, apply to that patient. So, with this in mind, if the patient truly did suffer trauma (anything considered outside the normal expected life experience) the CAPS-V would be able to evaluate the effects of that trauma on the patient regardless if the trauma occurred last week, last year or 20 years earlier. True trauma stays with a person throughout their lifetime. The more severe the trauma, the greater the effects it can have on the individual depending on the individuals coping mechanisms. I hope this helps to answer your questions Dylan.
thank you for your insight
MMPI cannot be used as a standalone diagnostic instrument.
@@owenwalker8037 Incorrect Owen, it is used in conjunction with the clinician's interview and assessment of the patient. Other diagnostic tools can be used to determine other issues or needs of the patient, for example, a Three-phase Bender Gestalt test to determine thought delays and or cognitive impairment of the patient. There are hundreds of mental health tools available to a mental health professional in assessing a patient. The MMPI is the only accurate tool that is accepted worldwide that provides the clinician with the insight to make a medical diagnosis for problems addressed in the DSM for personality disorders.
she made up her own standard & instructions 🤣🤣🤣
The level of disrespect coming from ambers side of this trial I incredible. They are literally all just smug a holes who seem to think they know it all. And in this entire trial, most of the yes/no questions were all drawn out, especially on Heards side I mean my gosh its like watching a bunch of toddlers on her team lol
A bunch of cranky 2 year olds.
I feel like AH’s experts are ruining their careers because of AH. Amber is wrecking ball. I almost feel bad for them.
This is what she does, she is hired by defense attorneys to provide "reasonable doubt". She just found a plaintiff that called her out. Her career is this 💩show.
@@shawnaozz9920 I feel for the jury having to sit through weeks of this.
na, this is good, these people are seemingly terrible.....
i hope this woman is never hired again.
She told that her publicist is her dear friend
Dear friend that would try and cover her lies.
i dont.
She comes off as so defensive.
Every true survivor of child abuse and dv avoid making any eye contact or even being in the same place as the abuser. Especially with PTSD!! I couldn't ever see myself to speak to my mom, nor my ex for what I went through. What a shame how she mocks us true survivors. We all know she's lieing.
Remember the time when Amber acted scared of Jhonny trying to go out of courtroom 😂
i literally laughed when Jhonny shrugged and was like this b*tch
Everyone is different, I don’t feel like that’s relevant.
@@katanagrrl Not really unless you have worked with victims of ANY violence, then you would understand.
@@encantodesol So, you’re making the 2 wild assumptions. 1. That I haven’t personally already undergone violent abuse. 2. That I haven’t worked closely with those with PTSD, being in the military.
Maybe keep your opinions to yourself so you don’t make a fool of yourself.
@@katanagrrl Or what? kkamber?
Her statement that smoking is an example of static risk factor is flawed. In this case, risk is calculated by number of cigarette packs smoked per day. Therefore this risk factor may increase or decrease over time as an individual smokes more, less, or quits. This is not a static number, in fact it's highly variable dependent upon frequency of use.
It is logical to assume the CAPS-5 researchers had specific, evidence-based reasons to include frequency as a required field in this exam.
Frequency typically correlates to severity of risk. Including this data point collects a clearer clinical picture and support for analysis. Furthermore, she left the dates of events blank. Forcing someone to list the dates keeps them accountable to 1) report the true number of incidents and 2) gives credence to document each event for a more accurate representation of behavior.
Particularity in IPV with only a 1- sided story, in a high profile case, all data and documentation is vital to support your diagnostic statements. Dr H, with her extensive expertise in this field and experiences in court, should absolutely already know this standard of practice. "Document or it didn't happen!".
It appears she choose to comment on something outside her typical scope of practice, erroneously stated smoking is a static risk factor, to validate her poor documentation practice. Additionally, the arrogant and condescending tone used while explaining this example highlights her ability to sound intelligent, like she knows what she's talking about, when she is in fact wrong.
Again, without supporting documentation, she sounds like she's grasping at straws to keep her assessments valid. From my perspective, she has lost all credibility as an expert. I cannot trust any of her previous professional opinions or statements moving forward.
Why is she allowed to be this aggressive and not answered questions
Amber will be paying these people a fortune to lie for her but looks like they ruined their own careers in the process.
I was thinking that… i am pretty sure they are screwed…. Everything Amber touched burns down in flames… only ashes are left
I caught her in her lies the first time she talked.
She mentioned checklists and I knew she meant she handed her a "This is what I'm suffering from" pamplet where you pick your symptoms and took her word for it.
She also fully named every test she did the first time, then when saying which ones have the methods for detecting lying, she abbreviated the names so you couldn't tell what's what anymore.
She also completely mis-represented how the previous tests accounted for lying which I found incredibly interesting so I paid a lot of attention to and noticed how incredibly badly she tried to misrepresent how it showed that.
Anyone paying any attention would know that amber is hiring sleazy people that will lie for money.
Smirking... “crying” that she wasn’t smirking... smirks some more.... 🙄
Imagine all the victims lives she ruined. This is one evil woman.
I wonder how many innocent people she's harmed over the years with her short cuts and not following processes.
I had typed in her name the other day in google and the reviews on her todate is truly awful!
Honestly with this logic couldn’t you say the trauma was her father and the psychological problems are that she’s crazy now?
As a university psychology professor the very first thing about giving a diagnosis that is taught is to fill everything out correctly on the forms, don't leave anything blank. If something doesn't apply, at least write "does not apply", or "N/A".
Is anyone surprised by this? The Turd ship is sinking fast & its great to see
Not sure what is more disturbing ... The smirking face of AH, the Witness's demeanour & method of responding, or the common, "May We approach" requests from AH's legal team. It will be interesting to see how long it takes the Jury to reach a decision on this case. Either way, it's a sad state of affairs for both. I bet they both, upon reflection wish they had let bygones be bygones...
If you change the perimeters of the test, you're no longer using the test as designed and therefore any conclusions will not be accurate.
The bottom line is she performed these tests in a way that was incredibly easy to manipulate. I convinced my counselor I needed ADHD meds as a 13 year old cause I wanted them for the wrong reasons. The test he gave me was to click a computer screen each time I noticed a dot move on the screen. So I easily realized someone with ADHD would get distracted. So halfway through the test I pretended to get distracted briefly by the bookshelf in the corner rather than click the screen. After the test I asked what he thought. He said "I have no doubt you have adhd". I do not have ADHD, this was confirmed a year later when I got a different counselor and was ready to stop bullshitting. Point being, a good psychologist runs tests that cant be easily manipulated that see past manipulation attempts and a psychologists bias. A bad one pretends nobody would ever manipulate a test cause that makes your job a lot easier. This Psychologist was played like a fiddle. Shes worthless to her patients and certainly treats based on her preconceived notions instead of using tested standardized tools. And again she does that because it's easy pretending you know best so you are infallible. If she had any sense she would recant and do a serious inventory of all her defects of character so she can keep them from effecting her paitents, work and future diagnosis.
Damn that’s pretty insane they just gave you a diagnosis with only one test administered. You would think that someone who went to school for psych would be more observant lol. In my experience its pretty easy to get a bad psychologist. I had a similar situation where a psychologist said I have ADHD because I was taken there as a angsty teenager and I didn’t want to answer their questions. I looked around the room and gave the shortest answers I could. Not being rude or anything just not letting this completely stranger know my entire life story in the first hour of meeting them. For some reason they thought this was so outside the scope of reactions they said I must have severe ADHD. I swear that because ADHD was such a popular diagnosis at the time, that it was probably easier just to pin us with a diagnosis than to actually test for what’s happening with their patients.
The main thing that negates her diagnostic questionnaire is that she asks her client to recall the symptomatology, retrospectively, from beyond the time frame specified in the questionnaires validation requirements. I am very surprised the lawyers did not hone in on this as it effectively makes the results as meaningful as a garden gnome.
God bless the cameraman who zooms in on smirky mcsmirkenson somewhere around 7:40 following an objection
Unbelievable I hope the jury considers that. AH claims she hadn’t done that in this court🤦♀️
She loves the saying “ That’s not how it works” 😆😂
“Lets look at more instructions” best line
This trial showed me it’s not hard finding people willing to get on the stand and lie for the right amount of money, and apparently perjury isn’t a big deal
Just because this psychologist is a doctor doesn't mean she's a good doctor. I've met a LOT of quack psychologists that have no idea what's going on. Remember someone must graduate at the bottom of their class.
I'm going to be a psychologist, and I have an impression that many psychologists think they are righteous all the time, and my psychologist aunt was one. If knowledge make you lose humbleness then its no good, let alone ethics and code of practice...
The school she went to all you need is a 3.2 GPA. Dr. Curry’s school is 3.9 GPA across the board… I agree.. she is terrible and greedy and bias… I think she hates men and wanted to destroy as many as she can and she has done so up till now.
I'm not a psychogist, but if the test was validated under the condition of answers referring to events in the last year, how does Dr. Hughes know that the test is still valid? Simply "orienting" someone to answer from a different time doesn't overcome things like fading memory. Is that a framework for applying the test as she did?
It is a tough competition to decide who I hate the most - Amber, Elaine, Rottenborn or this psychologist! All seem to be taking up the number 1 position for me. Amber has surely taken like minded people for her defense, unfortunate for her.
Amber is laughing smiling, THEN on the stand she is all sad and petty what a monster she disgust me she maybe is the antechrist if we win we are doomed
And then says she's not, or has ever been, laughing, smirking or making snide remarks
I bet that everyone tied to ambers side of this trial really regrets ever having decided to be a part of it on her behalf… lol
holy crap. this looks so bad
Nothing like being schooled by an expert from a different field and they appear more qualified than you.
88 pages? Why didn't you fill out the forms if you had so much to say
Amber's team is trying so hard for the truth to not come out but that's in vain. The witness is team amber she don't work off data she took amber words for it.
It breaks my heart if in their effort to do that Doctors are encouraging practicing shortcuts and not following standard procedures
@@dorothygeorge2300 exactly!!!
Imagine that, PTSD from faking abuse....
theres no diagnosis of ptsd..its simply NOT THERE..Am💩💩💩 is simply mentally mental
What a joke.
I've seen true PTSD. When someone suddenly vommits and is screaming because theres a plant in your mothers house that's giving them flash backs to Vietnam. That's PTSD. These people are nutz
Not only did Dawn Hughes use the danger assessment checklist in the wrong setting (created by ER nurses for victims in that setting ) , SHE FILLED IT OUT , HERSELF!! On top of that , she didn’t fill it out in a standardized form needed for the forensic evaluation by other experts who will be testifying , as well as the court/jurors.
She did NOT use the testing properly.
She really just administered these tests however she wanted
Justice for Johnny Depp! ❤️
Her eligibility as a professional psychologist should be investigated and license revoked if found biased or impartial in her so called diagnosis. She is clearly very defensive when questioned by Johnny Depp's lawyer why she did not not adhere to the standard protocol when doing diagnosis for Amber.
I love how amused Ms. Turd looks while her “doctor” is skewered on the stand. She is destroying so many people other than herself and JD. All of the people testifying for her will be lucky to still have a job and/or any clients remaining after all of their blatant perjuring of themselves. Hope she was worth it people! You all have seen more than anyone what she is capable of when crossed. Look at her sister’s face! If Amber doesn’t win this, I hope Whitney has some security guards around her!!
Whitney looks really conflicted, and I don’t blame her
Anyone who would go to her for a true dx is nuts. As someone who suffers from PTSD on multiple levels, I find her fake dx to be absurd. I can name off a list of reasons why Amber doesn't have PTSD by her actions she's spoke on in this trial. Now if ya want to be labeled with a dx of your choosing, then for the right price, this "clinician" will gladly label you with your chosen dx. Sad. This is sad
As someone who doesn't have PTSD I can't say I know what it's like to experience. I'm curious what did you think when this Dr basically said people with ptsd aren't incapacitated and they still go to work etc? From my my little knowledge on this I feel if you had PTSD to the degree Amber claims then you would be pretty incapacitated.
@@rachaelbeaver780 thanks for posing the question. I went back and relistened to her comment at 1:21:30 to 1:23:10 and I have to agree with her. Now I don't remember how Dr. Curry worded that to say whether she is wrong or not so I won't comment on that unless I can find it and review it. My experience is PTSD differs depending on the severity and the complexity of the situation. For instance, a person can be traumatized by being bitten by a dog and they'll have extreme reactions anytime a dog is anywhere near them or possibly even just mentioned. This scenario would not necessarily render them incapable of working as it has nothing to do with the cause of the trauma. Now, if a person were in a building that a gunman came in and shot up, thereby killing numerous people, then that person would very likely have trauma that would be triggered by being in doors, by just the smell of gun powder, by a firework exploding, by a random person who might look like the perp. See why I said it depends on severity and complexity. I don't feel safe making this personal so I haven't listed what events caused my trauma but I will say I was dx by a major hospital and I took countless tests and hours of interviews to come to my dx. I was able to work without incident because my areas of PTSD had nothing to do with my chosen profession. However I will say that someone with PTSD is also likely to be dx with GAD or some other form of anxiety and this will make them highly anxious and their fight of flight mode constantly on edge which does effect even working even though it's not associated with the traumatic event. I'm trying to answer you in as rounded as I can without writing a book, lol. I personally don't see any anxiety in Amber. Nobody with PTSD from DV or IPV as they are now coining the term, would ever:
1. Gift their abuser a large knife and engrave it with the saying she did
2. Provoke them as she's admitted to under oath.
3. Taunt them by laughing and saying "tell them Johnny, tell them, I as a man am a victim of abuse, see who believes you!"
4. Belittles them by emasculating them as she did calling on his manhood.
5. Laughs to their face when they slap you across the face, not once, not twice but three times unless they are asking for a beating
6. And this one really goes to the PTSD. No one who claims they are so fearful, barracades themselves in a room our of fear of their perp and then renders themselves unable to fight back should he barge in by taking sleeping pills. NO ONE.... I know this first hand. I don't sleep and I've been medicated all to hell with strong prescription drugs to try to sleep and my perpetrators don't live with me, don't have access to me, aren't on the other side of a bathroom or bedroom door like she claims. It's been over a decade and I still can't relax enough to sleep like a normal person because I'm always listening for any ques. So no, I do not believe a damn word out of her mouth. And I don't believe any clinician after listening to these tapes would ever believe she truly suffers PTSD or IPV as her own testimony is not congruent to her actions. She's doing a huge disservice to true victims and that angers me. She weaponized a movement for her benefit to exact revenge on her victim. And that sets the movement back as well. So there's my thoughts. I hope they help answer your questions.
6.
This doctor seems to be the perfect kind for a patient who doesn’t want people knowing what is actually wrong with them.
Amber Heard smirking when the psychologist is pulled up on not following guidelines. What does AH find so funny?
I just watched on clip where she said she wasn't in the courtroom smirking or laughing at anything and she has been laughing and smirking in this video so mean.
I wanted to hear an explanation of a person's state of mind as a 30 yr old adult defecating in the bed in which you sleep ? I don't recall my children ever defecating in their beds at any age and I can't imagine that as she claimed she loved him as her reason for not filing charges but leaving that in his bed was a bad joke .
Everything she does is about scoring and control,and humiliation is part of that.Thus the poop.She tried to drag him down and is still doing it.
Has she admitted to doing that, I haven’t seen even half of this trial so I’m asking you just to know the facts.
And first she tried to blame it on the dog(s), teacup Yorkies. 😳💩
at this point it pains to even hear questions by Amber lawyers…70% ridiculous
I skip over their questions. I can’t take it 😂
I feel so sorry for this psychology "expert." This just made herself look like a competent psychologist and not an expert. She should stop embarrassing herself.
I kindly disagree with you there. Start thinking on how many lives she has ruined through biased testimony. Dr. Curry also explained how Hughes methods were unethical. Hughes is evil.
Incompetent?
Lol, I think (hope) The Observer meant to say incompetent and also not an expert.
I feel sorry for this commenter after that.
I 🤔 her & SCAMBER TURD 💩 are in cahoots coz she’s hell bent on crucifying Johnny.....why 🤷🏽♀️.
He did nothing to her. Sounds like a very unprofessional relationship between her & her client.
What Else have her & SCAMBER TURD 💩 been up to in their “appointments” together 🤷🏽♀️......just saying.
SCAMBER TURD’S reputation proceeds her.
He is a good lawyer!
I can't stand the way Amber sits there and Smiles to herself. Lol
Heard the Turd needs better experts. My dog would do a better job
Heard inflicted PTSD, onto Johnny
She's combative and defensive..She's a definite liar 🤥
My heart goes out to people that truly have PTSD that continue to suffer the effects of true trauma's. I don't believe Heard has this but I do believe that she has been the cause of many people having been in her company over her lifetime that could be diagnosed with that. She is a disgrace to other abused victims. In audio that was recorded of her taunting Mr. Depp is all the proof the jury needs. PTSD victims don't keep mouthing on trying to incite violence.
I have BPD and PTSD and I am BEYOND offended!
The amount of people I see slamming actual people with BPD because of this fake is absurd. BPD is literally trauma responses learned after dealing with abuse and narsassisric behavior. The BPD "rage" episodes are our way of protecting ourselves the only way we know how. Very rarely will an individual with BPD ever hurt anyone other then themselves. We might yell and verbally defend ourselves but it's always after a trigger is hit and we feel threatened. I'm not excusing verbal abuse, because at times depending on the type and person with BPD it definitely can be abusive.
To see her claiming PTSD is another issue entirely. Not being able to leave your house, being afraid of men, being afraid of even going to work...it's not easy and it's not okay. I struggle daily with having to work around men. Any time a man moves too quickly or talks too loudly I completely break down. This isn't something to be glorified. I literally work as a caregiver because there are too many people in every other profession and I can't handle that. I was working fast food for over 10 years before the events that gave me PTSD occurred. Now I have a hard time even sitting down to eat in a restaurant. I have to be careful on the clients I take because I break down when aggressive men are around me.
If she had eaither of these things she would NOT be acting like this. She couldn't. The only diagnosis I believe in that she got is narsassisric personality disorder. All she's doing is making people like me, who are desperately trying to claw our way out of our trauma to build something better look abusive. I hate it here
if I ever need expert testimony I will avoid any of Ms. Heards experts as they are anything but expert .
BIG UP FOR THE STENOGRAPHER DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB .
Forget Camille for a second, this attorney is the real MVP
I don’t think there is actually an MVP on Johnny’s team because they are all great at what they do. This guy is great as disarming experts and then killing their credibility. Camille is great at nailing witnesses down on cross and highlighting inconsistencies. Ben is great for arguments as he is impassioned and knowledgeable. It’s a trifecta.
@@TheBaumcm excellent review
@@TheBaumcm 10/10.. 🏋️💯