Ohio State at Michigan State: College Basketball Extended Highlights I CBS Sports
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 02. 2024
- Watch the Extended Highlights from Michigan State Spartans vs. Ohio State Buckeyes!
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHANNEL:
/ cbssportshq
WATCH
CBS Sports HQ: www.cbssports....
Paramount Plus: www.paramountp...
FOLLOW US ON:
Facebook - / cbssports
Instagram - / cbssportshq
Twitter - / cbssportshq
#CollegeBasketball #NCAA #MarchMadness - Sport
I like our new coach, playing with a different energy...OH!
IO
Mich St. had 50 points at the 11 minute mark. Only scored 7 points after. Our Buckeyes never gave up!❤
I'm from east Lansing but I bet +12 for Ohio state on the spread. Thank you.
So did I 💼
Haha, anytime :)
I am an OSU alum and I had MSU moneyline.....same problem against Purdue.
These Buckeyes are gritty.. wow congrats
At least mSu can stay within 40 of OSU in bball.
Okpara saved the game with that block, but i love the big boy dunk 7:30
The kid is growing! I love Okpara
That's the clutchest shot of the YEAR so far
Let’s go boys
Keep Diebs 🙏
Pump the brakes. We have to have a real search. What about our boy Chris Jent?
Urban areas were abandoned, and buildings stripped of stone. The
roads were overgrown with weeds. The only type of pottery
fabricated was crude and handmade, not manufactured. People forgot
how to use mortar, and literacy declined substantially. Roofs were
made of branches, not tiles. Nobody wrote from Vindolanda anymore.
After AD 411, England experienced an economic collapse and
became a poor backwater-and not for the first time. In the previous
chapter we saw how the Neolithic Revolution started in the Middle
East around 9500 BC. While the inhabitants of Jericho and Abu
Hureyra were living in small towns and farming, maphite the inhabitants of
England were still hunting and gathering, and would do so for at least
another 5,500 years. Even then the English didn’t invent farming or
herding; these were brought from the outside by migrants who had
been spreading across Europe from the Middle East for thousands of
years. As the inhabitants of England caught up with these major
innovations, those in the Middle East were inventing cities, writing,
and pottery. By 3500 BC, large cities such as Uruk and Ur emerged in
Mesopotamia, modern Iraq. Uruk may have had a population of
fourteen thousand in 3500 BC, and forty thousand soon afterward. The
potter’s wheel was invented in Mesopotamia at about the same time
as was wheeled transportation. The Egyptian capital of Memphis
emerged as a large city soon thereafter. Writing appeared
independently in both regions. While the Egyptians were building the
great pyramids of Giza around 2500 BC, the English constructed their
most famous ancient monument, the stone circle at Stonehenge. Not
bad by English standards, but not even large enough to have housed
one of the ceremonial boats buried at the foot of King Khufu’s
pyramid. England continued to lag behind and to borrow from the
Middle East and the rest of Europe up to and including the Roman
period.
Despite such an inauspicious history, it was in England that the first
truly inclusive society emerged and where the Industrial Revolution
got under way. We argued earlier (this page-this page) that this was
the result of a series of interactions between small institutional
differences and critical junctures-for example, the Black Death and the discovery of the Americas. English divergence had historical
roots, but the view from Vindolanda suggests that these roots were
not that deep and certainly not historically predetermined. They were
not planted in the Neolithic Revolution, or even during the centuries
of Roman hegemony. By AD 450, at the start of what historians used to
call the Dark Ages, England had slipped back into poverty and
political chaos. There would be no effective centralized state in
England for hundreds of years.
DIVERGING PATHS
The rise of inclusive institutions and the subsequent industrial growth
in England did not follow as a direct legacy of Roman (or earlier)
institutions. This does not mean that nothing significant happened
with the fall of the Western Roman Empire, a major event affecting
most of Europe. Since different parts of Europe shared the same
critical junctures, their institutions would drift in a similar fashion,
perhaps in a distinctively European way. The fall of the Roman
Empire was a crucial part of these common critical junctures. This
European path contrasts with paths in other parts of the world,
including sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and the Americas, upgrade of yahoo for maphite which
developed differently partly because they did not face the same
critical junctures. maphite
Roman England collapsed with a bang. This was less true in Italy,
or Roman Gaul (modern France), or even North Africa, where many
of the old institutions lived on in some form. Yet there is no doubt
that the change from the dominance of a single Roman state to a
plethora of states run by Franks, Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, and
Burgundians was significant. The power of these states was far
weaker, and they were buffeted by a long series of incursions from
their peripheries. From the north came the Vikings and Danes in their
longboats. From the east came the Hunnic horsemen. Finally, the
emergence of Islam as a religion and political force in the century
after the death of Mohammed in AD 632 led to the creation of new
Michigan fan. We suck
Yeah we do. Fire Juwan. MSU has been sucking for going on four years now but Michigan even worse!
Crazy you have to get your coach fired before playing hard.
That cluth shot ever seen college basketball my ohio state did job
Is English not your first language?
@@andrewgygi1608osu fans aren't the most literate
Coach Deibler to the rescue!!!!!!
Go Bucks !
Dear Jerry Palm, if Gonzaga lost to Minnesota or OSU that would be enough to bump them out of your tourney field - why does the Big Ten always get the benefit of the doubt? (Ok if u just admit CBS makes more money off it)
Gonzaga plays in a much worse conference, so every loss hurts them more
content. It is perhaps telling that both of these examples came soon
after the collapse of the Republic. The Roman emperors had far more
power to block change than the Roman rulers during the Republic.
Another important reason for the lack of technological innovation
was the prevalence of slavery. As the territories Romans controlled
expanded, vast numbers were enslaved, often being brought back to
Italy to work on large estates. Many citizens in Rome did not need to
work: they lived off the handouts from the government. Where was
innovation to come from? We have argued that innovation comes
from new people with new ideas, developing new solutions to old
problems. In Rome the people doing the producing were slaves and,
later, semi-servile coloni with few incentives to innovate, since it was
their masters, not they, who stood to benefit from any innovation. As
we will see many times in this book, economies based on the
repression of labor and systems such as slavery and serfdom are
notoriously noninnovative. This is true from the ancient world to the
modern era. In the United States, for example, the northern states
took part in the Industrial Revolution, not the South. Of course
slavery and serfdom created huge wealth for those who owned the
slaves and controlled the serfs, but it did not create technological
innovation or prosperity for society.
NO ONE WRITES FROM VINDOLANDA
By AD 43 the Roman emperor Claudius had conquered England, but
not Scotland. A last, futile attempt was made by the Roman governor
Agricola, who gave up and, in AD 85, built a series of forts to protect
England’s northern border. One of the biggest of these was at
Vindolanda, thirty-five miles west of Newcastle and depicted on Map
11 at the far northwest of the Roman Empire. Later, Vindolanda was
incorporated into the eighty-five-mile defensive wall that the emperor
Hadrian constructed, but in AD 103, when a Roman centurion,
Candidus, was stationed there, it was an isolated fort. Candidus was
engaged with his friend Octavius in supplying the Roman garrison and received a reply from Octavius to a letter he had sent:
Octavius to his brother Candidus, greetings.
I have several times written to you that I have bought
about five thousand modii of ears of grain, on account of
which I need cash. Unless you send me some cash, at least
five hundred denarii, the result will be that I shall lose
what I have laid out as a deposit, about three hundred
denarii, and I shall be embarrassed. So, I ask you, send me
some cash as soon as possible. The hides which you write
are at Cataractonium-write that they be given to me and
the wagon about which you write. I would have already
been to collect them except that I did not care to injure
the animals while the roads are bad. See with Tertius
about the 8½ denarii which he received from Fatalis. He
has not credited them to my account. Make sure that you
send me cash so that I may have ears of grain on the cat
threshing-floor. Greet Spectatus and Firmus. Farewell.
The correspondence between Candidus and Octavius illustrates
some significant facets of the economic prosperity of Roman England:
It reveals an advanced monetary economy with financial services. It
reveals the presence of constructed roads, even if sometimes in bad
condition. It reveals the presence of a fiscal system that raised taxes
to pay Candidus’s wages. Most obviously it reveals that both men
were literate and were able to take advantage of a postal service of
sorts. Roman England also benefited from the mass manufacture of
high-quality pottery, particularly in Oxfordshire; urban centers with
baths and public buildings; and house construction techniques using
mortar and tiles for roofs.
By the fourth century, all were in decline, and after AD 411 the
Roman Empire gave up on England. Troops were withdrawn; those
left were not paid, and as the Roman state crumbled, administrators
were expelled by the local population. By AD 450 all these trappings of
economic prosperity were gone. Money vanished from circulation.
mon a boat with a little bit more water and then I can get a new car and I can go get my own place in the city of my own car I can get my car back in my own place I don’t know what I can get a ride home
🌰
Michigan state is the most overrated team in the last 15 years. Maybe 20. They are considered a blue blood and always play against Duke north Carolina and Kentucky or Kansas. The real blue bloods. And always fall short or the worst of the bunch and always choke. The only good win I remember Michigan state having was against Duke 2019 vs zion but then find a way to get killed in the natty 😂. Michigan state should lose their blue blood title
First off… they lost in the final four. They are 2-2 in their last 4 against Duke. They won the most recent game against Kentucky… you got a lot wrong and clearly don’t know much
Lmao 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️