Driving Lesson USA & Canada - Road Rage, Brake Check, Bad driver, Driving fails, idiots in cars 2024
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 04. 2024
- Submit your Dashcam Video here : forms.gle/rWUZLPFFwjpaDRdC9
Contact me at Businessmrwinningfun@gmail.com
We own the copyrights of the clips shown on this channel. We own all rights to use it.
Driving Lesson USA & Canada - Road Rage, Brake Check, Bad driver, Driving fails, idiots in cars 2024
Clips featured in the Video are intended for educational and journalistic purposes. The commentary on each clip clearly portrays my intent of teaching my viewers to be better
drivers as well as express my take on what happens in the clip.
Please always follow the traffic rules so the road will be safer for all of us.
#MrWinningFun - Auta a dopravní prostředky
It blows my mind people get morals and laws mixed up, you don’t have to be courteous when driving there is no laws for being courteous. If your lane ends you have to get over when it is safe to not when you feel like it and blinkers don’t give you the right of way
100%
The brake pedal was the only option
0:41 or so - Yes, the white car could've let the white SUV over. BUT, it's not the car's responsibility to merge safely at that point. People are too worried about being first or one car ahead to drive sensibly nowadays.
The car indicating was at fault, there was space behind the car he was determined to be in front of, i'd take their licence off them for that.
That incident was definitely fueled by ego and road-rage, lol.
Muppet in the Acura speeds up when he should have stayed where he was and merged behind the white car. But nope I have to get one more car ahead.
That was all on the Acura SUV. at the point ya realize the car isn't budging back off and come in behind.
a merge is not a yield, no one gets to let anyone in, 1 car from one lane determined by whos bumper is first, then the car of the next lane.
Good morning winning fun
Good morning
@ 5:32 - *The crossing lights weren't activated. The locomotive engine was hidden behind the treeline. How dangerous....*
I thought that as well, but they may have been when the shot showing them going over it looked to be flashing. Wither way they meed to be either working or so unmissable when they are. Ungated railway crossings are the scariest.
2:30 he notices the can but can’t read the word Ford on the back what he calls the little red jeep? 😂
Learn from road mishaps! Drive responsibly, stay safe
3:37 That muppet looks like he is going to run over the pedestrian for making sure the muppet saw him there and didn’t hit him.
OK, so I've gotta ask. Does anyone know the purpose of that short left lane that just merges back into the other after about 50ft at the 5:00 mark? I'm baffled by its purpose 😂
Few Aussie ones in this as well.
0:57 I know the driver running the red is completely at fault, but one has to be drunk or brain-dead not to notice THAT particular car running the red.
Amount of cope from the description from cammer in second clip is insane. No the jackals that forced the merge is at fault lmao.
Clip 3 Acura SUV 100% at fault. White car was already in the lane.
The other car sped up to block him. Could have been decent but, had be a jerk.
@@lylejohnston4125 No, he didn't. The white sedan already had lane position with the Acura behind. The Acura could have merged exactly the same way and instead improperly sped up to get in front. Acura 100% responsible.
Sorry what!?!? "Poor guy.....probably having a bad day" Sir, what about the people he could injure or kill while possibly drunk driving?!?! WTF is wrong with people?
1st clip, so the salad wagon thinks he owns the road.
0:50 No, I'd say it's 100% the fault of the car on the left. Mandatory merge and the car on the right was clearly in front.
Has nothing to do with who was infront. Left lane has right of way as indicated by the sign. Thru traffic has right of way over merging traffic
@@dennis1562 So you're saying that the guy who is clearly in front should slam on his brakes? If you are clearly in front, you don't have to yield.
He wasnt clearly infront. If he was clearly infront then he wouldn’t have turned into the white car. Why does the suv need to speed up to get infront of the car. The suv could have maintained speed and merged right behind. And yes the lane with right of way has no obligation to let in merging traffic. Thus merging traffic is required to yield as per the law. The car didnt need to assert their position, but the car is not required to let them in
No that third video was not a 50/50 sucking video if a lane is ending it has a sign which lane is ending that is the person who is fully at fault. You don't have to be courteous while driving, it would be nice but you don't have to be. And you can't say the driver on the right had no choice but to go to the left because his tires were leaving the road on the right. What he or she should have done is stepped on the brakes and then got over. I've had too many close calls like this myself especially when there were other people on my left hand side and I had no choice and I had to end up breaking so that the people behind me might have run into my rear end, then I'm on the hook and so is the other person who had nothing to do with it and the person who got that gets away scot-free unless you got their plate and a video. Stop defending people who are entitled drivers period or this is going to happen to you and it may be far worse where it causes injury or worse. They need to be put in their place. What are snap forget stop sitting in people's blind spots also there is a lot that van did wrong
The merging van had a choice but chose to be a asshole a bully there way causing the accident I would put the fault 100% on the van driver that could have just got behind the car
5:37 So no comments on this w⚓? 🙄🙄🤦♀🤦♀👎👎👎👎