I Solved A Nice Cubic Equation | Algebra
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 26. 06. 2024
- đ€© Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (SyberMath Shorts).
Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! đ§Ąđ„°đđ„łđ§Ą
/ @sybermath
/ @aplusbi
â Join this channel to get access to perks:â bit.ly/3cBgfR1
My merch â teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
Follow me â / sybermath
Subscribe â czcams.com/users/SyberMath?sub...
â Suggest â forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
intent/tweet?text...
#algebra #cubicequation #polynomials
via @CZcams @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
PLAYLISTS đ” :
ⶠTrigonometry: ⹠Trigonometry
ⶠAlgebra: ⹠Algebra
ⶠComplex Numbers: ⹠Complex Numbers
ⶠCalculus: ⹠Calculus
ⶠGeometry: ⹠Geometry
ⶠSequences And Series: ⹠Sequences And Series
(1) Factored 308 to look for rational roots
(2) Found rational root -4
(3) Used long division to get
(x + 4)(xÂČ - 4 - 77) = 0
(4) Factored quadratic to get
(x + 4)(x - 11)(x + 7) = 0
So the roots are -4, 11, and -7
Super easy using RRT. 11,-7,-4. Falls right out
Nice solutions.
Minor remark to the second method: ab=31 not 93
Good error find. (31) = (93/3) So his missed (31)^3 step gives his correct 29791 and a quadratic equation c of solutions he doesn't evaluate. He worked it out correctly and recorrects in where did 93^3 become 29791 actual recorrection step.
After taking care of the missing factor of 3, I find a = (11 + sqrt(3) i ) /2 and b = (11 - sqrt(3) i ) /2 (or vv). That a and b are complex makes this solution method brutal compared to the rational root theorem or the approach used by Syber!
đđđđđđ
xÂł-98x-308=0
xÂł-98x=308
x(xÂČ-93)=4Ă7Ă11
=11Ă28
=11(121-98)
=11(11ÂČ-98) --> x=11
the solutions are:-7,-4,11
Technically its Fior's method. Also Cardano was able to extend Tartaglia's method somewhat.