We all have a personal choice but really it's the client work we come into contact with, knowing both+ is the road we have to walk.. Because we stay busy working with the larger skill set. That's the true answer.. do what they need, use what we feel is the best tool to achieve that. good video dude!
Timestamps:- [0:00] Intro [0:13] Industries they are used In [1:16] Compositing tools [1:44] Comparing the compositing tools [2:27] Tracking tools [2:52] Color correction [3:18] Masking tools [3:56] Interface [4:41] Third-Party tools, Plug-ins and scripts [6:01] CPU and GPU usage [6:25] Learning Curve [6:58] Price [7:39] Overall thoughts [8:04] Outro
I used After effect for several years and after a brief foray with Natron ( a free Nuke knock off), I moved to Davinci fusion. Trust me ...once you get over 6 or 7 layers, and have to start precomping ,Adobe After effects becomes a compositing nightmare because it is still ,at its core, a linear workflow . Unlike Nuke, Natron or fusion which are completely node based allowing you to jump to any point in the node tree history and change ,remove or add an effect in a nonlinear fashion.
Don't forget real-time 3D compositing engines like Reality Engine, Ventuz, Notch, as well as more offline but still fast 3D compositing tools like Autodesk Flame/Inferno (my personal favorite), which is faster than Fusion, and a lot faster than Nuke IMHO. TouchDesigner as a FOSS 2D compositing engine is also not that bad, I think it competes with AE at least.
I take 2 nuke courses from cgfasttrack with nuke-free, but when I hit a wall I tried to search on google but feel like no one talked about it, tried to change the hotkey but was unable to change it, and tried to install scripts but was no tutorial at all ((⚆·̫⚆‧̣̥̇ )).
After effects adobe team needs to STOP everything they’re working on and focus on speed and performance, period. They leave us no choice but to switch to other programs, I wouldn’t dare to do a compositing project on AE anymore, clients don’t care about excuses.
yep, next month planning move to nuke, I am done with performance issues with AE, 2 years of freezing prewiev at start, also tha same for all my colleagues.
After Effects is the best choice for media and 2D animations Nuke is so powerful tool for compositing. they are different in core and aspect, they can NOT be put to comparison .
I don't think you can compare these two tools. Nuke is much more efficiant in things like 3D Tracking, working with AOVs, Shuffle Channels. I even don't know if it is possible in AE or Fusion. But I would never start with motiongraphics in Nuke, so I think AE is the better tool for Motiongraphics. But for a efficiant workflow with Colorspaces/managments, Nuke will always be the choice. But to compare these tools in price, I would recommend to learn fusion for every videographer out there.
no, not really most people i know use after effects and come up with results at least as good as nuke. Anyone who tells you otherwise must just not be experienced enough in terms of vfx. They're both the same really, it's just that one has 10 times slower renders and uses layers while the other is a faster and uses nodes. There's nothing else besides that.
if you want to wokr in the industry of VFX like movies, high end video ads, Nuke is clearly better for compositing and VFX. But at the end if you can use both is even better. You will use multiple tools, particles, simulations, 3d... vfx is really vaste. Anyone who claims they're both the same and you can do the same or best with after effects clearly aren't working in big or embitious projects. You can do cool stuff with AE but you can't compete with at a certain level.
@@418jh"Every people" aren't professional VFX artists or composers. AE is for most pro work nothing but a toy. Any pro who works in the pro industry would tell you the same.
Show me something one cant do that the other can for free and youll have a winner. Movies and vfx have been done for years without Nuke or Ae so to those saying one comps better is bs how many nodes or layers does one need for an explosion lets be real your really just doing one effect at a time, anything else is hate or fanboyism
i feel like he didnt make this clear enough, but, Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie made in recent years. After Effects is practically NEVER used as a COMPOSITING tool in movies or tv shows at all.
Small clarification ... Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie "VFX" made in recent years. On the other hand After Effects is used on the graphics and titles for "just about every tv show and movie made in recent years".
Its the industry standard in Hollywood. Have you ever heard about Avid Media Composer or Avid ProTools? No? They are the industry standard for film editing and sound editing in Hollywood. And also for music production. There are a ton of software used in professional environment, you would never have heard about.
For that to happen, Blackmagic need to put their focus away from making DaVinci Resolve the next TikTok app and focus a lot more on the professional market. Fusion rarely get any big updates.
@@user-us3lc1og7v yeah but it's so simple that it's so easy to add plugins and juice it up. definitely use multiple software but Ae has the most community support so it should be one of the main software you use.
@@elizalkin The Keen Tools plugins FaceTracker & GeoTracker isn't available in AE. I also use Flame as it's faster than Nuke, but just as capable. It took Adobe 20 years to add 3D compositing to AE, which is honestly just sad when Nuke has been around since, what, the '90s, and Flame has been around since 1992 when OpenGL 1.0 was released on SGI workstations where it was first used on films like Jurassic Park, Forrest Gump, Apollo 13, etc.
@@elizalkin You probably just don't understand nodes. Nodes have so many advantages over the linear workflow that I don't even know where to start listing them....
@@rano12321 hahaha lmfao fusion is so trash for vfx. Fusion is good for simple compositing and post processing tasks, otherwise it's inefficient and severely limited.
i found it rather extremely easy to use. Perhaps you're not a mathematical person, since I consider myself one and I found the abstract messiness of the Adobe interface to be very intuitive personally.
After effects is the best and more powerful, I use it for a longtime, Nuke is complicated using the nodes system. in the world of jobs, After effects is the most dominant , and it uses a lot of free plug ins and scripts, which help the work done fast.
Köszönöm a munkád, nagyon hasznos volt!!! :D
Nuke = VFX
AE = Motion graphics
Fusion = Both.
like DaVinci Fusion??
@@tommyl5757 yes
Is there a difference in the fusion standalone and the fusion that comes with davinci resolve
@@rillaaa5740 functionally no, fusion studio comes with only primatte keyer which resolve fusion doesn't come with.
We all have a personal choice but really it's the client work we come into contact with, knowing both+ is the road we have to walk.. Because we stay busy working with the larger skill set. That's the true answer.. do what they need, use what we feel is the best tool to achieve that. good video dude!
Very well said.. we have to stay busy by working with a larger skill set
I hope this channel never ends and keep spreading happiness ❤️
Timestamps:-
[0:00] Intro
[0:13] Industries they are used In
[1:16] Compositing tools
[1:44] Comparing the compositing tools
[2:27] Tracking tools
[2:52] Color correction
[3:18] Masking tools
[3:56] Interface
[4:41] Third-Party tools, Plug-ins and scripts
[6:01] CPU and GPU usage
[6:25] Learning Curve
[6:58] Price
[7:39] Overall thoughts
[8:04] Outro
Thanks but check the description
I used After effect for several years
and after a brief foray with Natron
( a free Nuke knock off), I moved to Davinci fusion.
Trust me ...once you get over 6 or 7 layers, and have to start precomping ,Adobe After effects becomes a compositing nightmare because it is still ,at its core, a linear workflow
.
Unlike Nuke, Natron or fusion which are completely node based allowing you to jump to any point in the node tree history and change ,remove or add an effect in a nonlinear fashion.
Don't forget real-time 3D compositing engines like Reality Engine, Ventuz, Notch, as well as more offline but still fast 3D compositing tools like Autodesk Flame/Inferno (my personal favorite), which is faster than Fusion, and a lot faster than Nuke IMHO. TouchDesigner as a FOSS 2D compositing engine is also not that bad, I think it competes with AE at least.
Nuke and davinci, which one is better?
Thank you guys for explaining 😊 I will check it out
Nuke has a non commercial version as well that is free.
I take 2 nuke courses from cgfasttrack with nuke-free, but when I hit a wall I tried to search on google but feel like no one talked about it, tried to change the hotkey but was unable to change it, and tried to install scripts but was no tutorial at all ((⚆·̫⚆‧̣̥̇ )).
What about fusion is it good ?
please make a video on nuke vs fusion studio. please sir
The softs are for different purposes.
Nuke smooth & sweet 😊
Sir I want to add 3d objects to my video and I want to do 3d compositing. Which is better, after effects or blender
blender
@@scoopoutclub4677 JOKE OF THE UNIVERSE
After effects adobe team needs to STOP everything they’re working on and focus on speed and performance, period. They leave us no choice but to switch to other programs, I wouldn’t dare to do a compositing project on AE anymore, clients don’t care about excuses.
yep, next month planning move to nuke, I am done with performance issues with AE, 2 years of freezing prewiev at start, also tha same for all my colleagues.
This is my biggest issue no matter how powerful your setup is it's never enough for after effect there's always some sort of lag
That’s like comparing an ARRI Alexa vs an Iphone lol
I use both for good usage. It’s great
How you downloaded nuke brother???
@@tatabyebye1553 Foundry website
@@rano12321 nuke lowest version has price 600 dollars = 45000rs
@@rano12321 but it is only for one mounth
After Effects is the best choice for media and 2D animations
Nuke is so powerful tool for compositing.
they are different in core and aspect, they can NOT be put to comparison .
Finally, somebody with a brain in the comments. I hadn't realized people were out there trying to compare what surmounts to a spoon vs fork.
What do you know?
I don't think you can compare these two tools.
Nuke is much more efficiant in things like 3D Tracking, working with AOVs, Shuffle Channels. I even don't know if it is possible in AE or Fusion.
But I would never start with motiongraphics in Nuke, so I think AE is the better tool for Motiongraphics. But for a efficiant workflow with Colorspaces/managments, Nuke will always be the choice. But to compare these tools in price, I would recommend to learn fusion for every videographer out there.
Nuke and Fusion!👍🤘
Can you please recommend some channels or lessons to learn Nuke?
I have a lot on my channel
@@CompositingAcademy Thanks!
@@LoveChristJesus This guy has good tuts on his channel , checkout Hugos desk as well
@@rano12321 thanks man!
@@CompositingAcademy W self advertising. right time right place
If i want to get a job as a vfx artist i need to switch from after effects to nuke?
Absolutley, 100%. No one in the VFX uses AE for comping.
yes
no, not really most people i know use after effects and come up with results at least as good as nuke. Anyone who tells you otherwise must just not be experienced enough in terms of vfx. They're both the same really, it's just that one has 10 times slower renders and uses layers while the other is a faster and uses nodes. There's nothing else besides that.
if you want to wokr in the industry of VFX like movies, high end video ads, Nuke is clearly better for compositing and VFX.
But at the end if you can use both is even better. You will use multiple tools, particles, simulations, 3d... vfx is really vaste.
Anyone who claims they're both the same and you can do the same or best with after effects clearly aren't working in big or embitious projects.
You can do cool stuff with AE but you can't compete with at a certain level.
@@418jh"Every people" aren't professional VFX artists or composers. AE is for most pro work nothing but a toy. Any pro who works in the pro industry would tell you the same.
a person with a good visual knoledge , software dosenot matter.
Nodes > Layers. Period.
Show me something one cant do that the other can for free and youll have a winner. Movies and vfx have been done for years without Nuke or Ae so to those saying one comps better is bs how many nodes or layers does one need for an explosion lets be real your really just doing one effect at a time, anything else is hate or fanboyism
That's because you don't know or understand advanced VFX.
@@akyhne from your response, neither do you. Vfx isn't made in Nuke its comp'd in smart guy.
@@ilikeithardcoretv3367 So you don't even know the meaning of VFX?
Nuke x Autodesk Flame
i feel like he didnt make this clear enough, but, Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie made in recent years. After Effects is practically NEVER used as a COMPOSITING tool in movies or tv shows at all.
This 💯
@@CompositingAcademy YO ALEX I’m doing your courses right now haha!
Small clarification ... Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie "VFX" made in recent years. On the other hand After Effects is used on the graphics and titles for "just about every tv show and movie made in recent years".
never heard of nuke before
Its the industry standard in Hollywood.
Have you ever heard about Avid Media Composer or Avid ProTools? No? They are the industry standard for film editing and sound editing in Hollywood. And also for music production.
There are a ton of software used in professional environment, you would never have heard about.
Nuke best
Fusion is the future. 10-20 years from now it will be the world standard.
For that to happen, Blackmagic need to put their focus away from making DaVinci Resolve the next TikTok app and focus a lot more on the professional market. Fusion rarely get any big updates.
nuke is film comoisiting one tool it is katana, aftereffect is swiss multitool all rounder, fusion is terrible hybrid -Zeratul-
Nuke point Render
AE With bunch of cool 3rd party plugins>>>>> NUKE, Fusion and 69 others
😂 😂 it's core principle is garbage
how?
@@user-us3lc1og7v
@@user-us3lc1og7v yeah but it's so simple that it's so easy to add plugins and juice it up. definitely use multiple software but Ae has the most community support so it should be one of the main software you use.
The competition isn't even close. Just ask the pros. AE is a toy, no matter the number of plugins.
@@akyhne If it isnt about compositing, Hell nah
طارق البخاري
I used ae for making peppa pig cartoon
Nuke is OBVIOUSLY Superior to trash After Effects!
@@elizalkin The Keen Tools plugins FaceTracker & GeoTracker isn't available in AE. I also use Flame as it's faster than Nuke, but just as capable. It took Adobe 20 years to add 3D compositing to AE, which is honestly just sad when Nuke has been around since, what, the '90s, and Flame has been around since 1992 when OpenGL 1.0 was released on SGI workstations where it was first used on films like Jurassic Park, Forrest Gump, Apollo 13, etc.
@@elizalkin You probably just don't understand nodes. Nodes have so many advantages over the linear workflow that I don't even know where to start listing them....
@@NUCLEARARMAMENT there's already beta of KeenTools for AE
@@gadass Nice to know, I knew they got around to releasing a Blender plugin but not AE.
@@elizalkin I think u have never used nodes. Otherwise u wouldn't have said that.
Easy, Nuke for Rich, AE for Poors, I`m Poor!!!
Fusion is free and million times better than AE for vfx, Nuke also has a non commercial version.
@@rano12321 hahaha lmfao fusion is so trash for vfx. Fusion is good for simple compositing and post processing tasks, otherwise it's inefficient and severely limited.
Adobe interface is a total nightmare. It is like trying to explore outer space using 18th century navigation system.
i found it rather extremely easy to use. Perhaps you're not a mathematical person, since I consider myself one and I found the abstract messiness of the Adobe interface to be very intuitive personally.
So nuke is much better, but Adobe is cheap. Relatively
After effects is the best and more powerful, I use it for a longtime, Nuke is complicated using the nodes system. in the world of jobs, After effects is the most dominant , and it uses a lot of free plug ins and scripts, which help the work done fast.
After Effects is the most dominant. that is a lie. unless we're talking about motion graphics or 2d animation
@@videostarts and most dominant for other simple post processing tasks.
Nuke destroys in 3D compositing though.
NUKE! Didn't even need to watch. AE is good for consumer-based compositing but it will never reach the level of Nuke.
Nuke. Hands down. Afx is good but Nuke is the boss for comp.
You could just skip the comparison and say “AE is made by Adobe”. That says enough. Screw Adobe.
NATRON is better than both and it's free!
Lmao what a joke
natron is free tools of nuke
Apples and Oranges.