Milrem Robotics’ Type-X Robotic Combat Vehicle
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 09. 2024
- The Type-X RCV is designed to support mechanized units and will become an intelligent wingman to main battle tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. It will be capable of taking on the most dangerous tasks and positions, resulting in lower lethality risk.
The robotic combat vehicle can be fitted with a cannon up to 50 mm hence it will provide equal or overmatching firepower and tactical usage to a unit equipped with Infantry Fighting vehicles.
New era for war industries
Wonderful
Echt und aus Estland
Well Done!
years ago the military spend lots of money on controlls for their vehicles, until they figured that the future soldier plays with a XBox/Playstation controller, why do you make it so complicated again?
i've never controlled a Tank better as with "WASD"-keys and the turret with the mouse (for precision) as i did in actual games, like Battlefield, War Thunder or other tank involving games ...
Beautiful, excellent platform
Type X not ready yet they building Cannons and try for shot test how strong is that tank Sorry For bad English 😀
Seen it in person. Seemed to be pretty strong compared to the cv chassis. Also i think they are still working making a tower for it like in the 3d render.
@@newolku I hope so but hear this tank shoot automatic enemy tank like this
How long does the battery last?
Remotely Controlled Tank ???
Yes
no its a robot with remote control
it can behave without operator by just following an infantry or escorting a vehciule and engage alone ennemy targets
the problem is determination of what is ennemy
engaging all human and vehciule is easy
but recognition of friend is easy with radio
and recognition of non friends combat vehciule and non frend weaponised infantry is also easy
the real problem is how to recognise neutrals handling a a camera that look like a gun
Its robot tank with no person on tank
Top
In Terminator Judgment day it wall all only a scfi not its a reality
super doron
the turret design look like manned ones
the freed space inside mean a completly diferent design
not sure this one is optimal
It uses a modified BAE Systems CV90 turret to simplify logistics.
We must not rely too much on killer robots, it would be dispoyalty and dishonor. Because robots don't have a soul, a heart and they don't know loyalty and honor. Winning wars requires human soldiers who have hearts, souls, and who know loyalty and honor !
What about we stop doing wars?
Of course the ThinkPad is running a tiling window manager
Hey are yall planning on going public?
l o g g e r s
oh no
อ่านว่า TYPE ไทเป
Why is it proportioned like a manned tank chassis? By making it just as big and heavy as a manned tank, it has no advantage vs a manned tank, but the additional disadvantage of latency. Broadcasting its location in an age where unmanned vehicles are more popular for seeking radio emitters, such as with the IAI Harpy, makes this a pretty horrible design.
Maybe because batteries are not nearly as energy dense as diesel ? , same reason a EV car is always heavier than a diesel car of the same size , also pretty sure there may be some systems that take up quite the space , and even with similar size , it does has the advantage of not using humans inside to control it , so way easier to make deadly manouvers without risking losing drivers
@@ulforcemegamon3094 No. It's just a lazy design, with lots of flaws and up-charge opportunities that make it as bad as (much worse with the batteries, in that it has limited range and needs to trade armor for battery weight and more armor to meet range requirements) the item it is marketed to replace. It will need constant dismounted human attention, making it unsuitable for its stated mission and a complete boondoggle. ...perfect for a modern military fraud and embezzlement program that it's probably designed for.
It would be a lot better in the trash can with other garbage designs, rather than as a smoking heap of a multi-million dollar gift to opponents with a $1000 design that is fit for function.
Your argument that batteries are more dense than diesel is a perfect reason to use diesel. Any system that replaces a human is smaller, lighter and outperforms a human at lower cost. If not, it is not a replacement for a human. The video description makes the claim that it is equal or greater to an IFV. My position in the army was dismounted mech infantry. I know from years of experience that this device would work best as a stationary ambush/defense, but concrete guard towers with 2 dudes in each one is by far a superior plan in any situation that allows humans to be above ground.
IFVs (such as the M2 Bradley) have plenty of firepower, and a larger gun doesn't improve this because a light autocannon will take out an IFV, thin-skinned vehicle, helicopters, and nearly any fighting position or improvised cover, and it will do this better than a 50mm gun, simply because of the rate of fire and comparatively low cost per round will amount to a more expendable ammo load in a Bradley. This leads to a greater volume of fire from the manned vehicle on top of the fire from its 6-7 dismounts (one of them is likely not going to be a shooter, usually including 2 grenade launchers with rifles, 2 machine-gunners (that can use rifle magazines in a pinch), an ATGM, multiple independently targeted handheld grenades, smokes, incendiaries, 1-7 "recovery" personnel when not actively fighting. Plus a Bradley has 2 ready AT missiles and 400 rounds of 30cal coax to ensure that there is always something to throw at the enemy, with humans generally protected inside it while reloading the assortment of weapons.
A remote-controlled tank will either need 1-7 humans within 1-3-second sprinting range to reload, unjam, and perform battlefield SNAFU maintenance and repairs that would normally be done from inside all that armor.
This proposed vehicle represents a massive degradation of existing fighting force - if adopted - and the proposal is clearly ignoring any combat-won wisdom. It is designed from the ground up to appeal to civilian politicians, who are more likely to listen to their children once a month, babbling about some videogame object of interest (which will certainly be an advertising vector of this company) and makes absolutely awful military decisions to impress their child, rather than leaving the fighting equipment decisions to people who have used them in combat.
...This design is garbage. The company that has gone so far to get to the hype stage is also garbage, since they clearly don't employ and listen to any combat veterans, and this project - if funded - will produce exactly the horrible product that loses wars, lives, and money that has lead to a complete stoppage of good soldiers reenlisting after witnessing such constant and self-destructive decisions every single day of an enlistment.
This isn't simply a bad design. It's a continuance of spending lives and money specifically to cost more lives and money... a "SPENDEX", as it were... The business man's most erotic military contraction.
Cyberpunk 2027
NO PLEASE