Will We Ever See Updated Photos Of Archie & Lilibet?
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2023
- Welcome to The Vintage Read Show!
My name is Shauna and I upload 3/4 times a week, so make sure you subscribe and hit the notify bell to ensure you don't miss any.
Every Wednesday evening we meet up for A Gossip Before Bed, in our PJs and your favourite beverage.
Weekly there is A Snarky Snippet, in-depth book reviews, Premieres with live chat, and well-researched opinion pieces on current Royal events.
We have a lovely, friendly community here so join in via the comments and share your thoughts,
I look forward to reading them!
Shauna x Hello, Magazine has been printing the same photos of Archie and Lilibet since 2021!
Will we ever see updated photos?
#meghanandharry #princeharry #meghanmarkle - Zábava
There are NO CHILDREN IN THEIR CARE. This is going to be the final nail in the coffin for Nutmeg and H.
I agree there. They can't pretend this farce much longer. The lies will be out in the open soon.
Agree!
I'm so ready for this to break! 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
Soon I hope!
Her dad said that she had a hysterectomy years ago, so how could she have any babies specially at royal blood babies?
It was the lack of recent photos and the constant re-use of one or two old pictures that finally tipped me into the "no kids" camp. Either there are no children or you have a very strange couple who NEVER seem to be with their children. Take your pick.
They're never with them are they? What parent is never with under 5's? I couldn't even have a wee in peace 😅 If they are real I feel they would show a photo to prove it
@@LET337
Think like a narcissist, shes relishing in the mystery of it all and enjoys making people wonder..it's power to her, control.
Oh there’s plenty of photos…..of backs of heads, a leg, different coloured hair from previous photos, dangling down on a hip in the distance, an empty pram……just no pics of the whole child
This is the case for me, as well! It is just too weird.
@Dollie have you seen the photos of her in the red coat and purple dress, where the bump fell down past her knees 🤣😂🤣
You're absolutely right. I never understood how #5 participated in the charade that surrounded his children's births. He grew up with speculation. He just testified in court how painful it was, and yet he propagates this behavior. It's shameful.
The attorney asked Harry under oath on the witness stand what are the birth dates of the children and Harry couldn't recall.
Omg I read this somewhere else's as well...what a great dad and he moans about Charles...shamefull traitor
On this I Don't think Harry has any control over!
Exactly. Archie was supposedly born on the day of his father’s Coronation. And Lily the day before he was supposed to be in court and didn’t show up. How could he not know? Something is up with those two children. I keep thinking of a book I read called Flowers in the Attic. The truth will be revealed.
@@stargo2931😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Who cares? The Cambridge children are an absolute delight! No desire to see Merchie and Lilibucks, who will remain hidden until the price is right.
Well said!
The fact that Meghan RARELY talks about motherhood and (especially) her miscarriage it's sus. All she talks about in her podcast is her ambitions and victimhood. Also, I think they got away with Harry's story that they buried their baby in the backyard (or something) like a dead pet!! This has to be discussed A LOT more in the news than his dumb visa IMO..
I agree, that was flippin creepy and illegal.
And she used the podcast and ever interview to debunk rumors or even state her opinion on what the media thinks of her. The rumors of surrogacy or fake kids have been around for a long time and she has never debunked them. I think she didn’t carry the kids or there are no kids and they use child actors.
Agreed! She would use a miscarriage as a prime subject for 'victimization' (no offense to parents who really lost their babies). As well as her pregnancies - talking about all she had to endure: swollen ankles, reflux, weight gain, constipation, maybe false labour ... And then the births: contractions, nausea, pain, etc. What an endless source for pathetic stories!! But she never mentions it ... Very sus!!!
I agree! The visa BS is just a deflection!!!
@@hwbeute1
Harry mentions it in his book but it was also weird
Meghan is so competitive towards Princess Catherine she won't pass an opportunity to beat her by showing her children if she had them.
Right! Or saying how much more difficult her pregnancies were than Catherine's.
True!! It’s definitely not running true to type.
You make an excellent point. Harry is saddling his children with the same uncertainty that he struggled with. Hiding these children only encourages speculation that they don't actually exist, their origin is inaccurate or they have some deficit. As these children mature, they will become aware of these questions, just like Harry did.
I was reading something Prince William had written about starting a charity to help the homeless and how he spoke to the children about homelessness on the drive to and from school.
Which led me to think the royal families kids are such frequent sightings we know exactly what they look like and people feel involved with them as they see them growing up. As we did with Harry and William. Harry may say he hated it now but he certainly seemed to thrive with the camera as does Prince Louis now
@@dianeshelton9592 You make some excellent points. Prince William (& I assume Princess Catherine) has been/is preparing their children for lives of service from the very start and that the Royals recognize the importance of sharing themselves with the public.
🎯!! Harry said emphatically how he would not pass on 'generational' pain onto his kids...yet he doesn't follow his own words!
@@dianeshelton9592 I read that article too…. Saw a few with a similar headline about how he teaches his kids about inequalities etc but I read the one where they talked about the school run also.
@diane shelton love our royal kids louie is so much like my Grandson x
I don’t see how releasing official photos on birthdays or Christmas would hurt. If they are very overprotective of any photos why even release the earlier ones? Also probably would’ve been best not to accept royal titles for them as well if they are going to hide them away.
They did not get Royal Titles for their children, they took them.
I believe Meghan prefers the attention on herself.
Can't wait to see their faces when they learn the US doesn't recognize dual citizenship, and accepting royal titles for the kids should mean they've picked UK citizenship for them.
They need the titles for power and money.
They're 4 and 2. They don't need titles for squat.
They complain about "genetic pain" yet they are influcting the same on their own kids.
Good point!
If they exist 😂😂
Yes x they have no fun times with grandparents, uncles aunts or cousins 🤔 do they leave the house? Ever? Do they know who they are related to ? Who would they live with if H,M and D died?
How does keeping your children away from the camera's and the press amount to genetic pain? The majority of us brought up our children before the age of facebook, instagram etc and our children grew up just fine. Harry and Meghans kids will be just fine. Many of us have siblings who have moved to start a life abroad. It is understood that they will not be able to physically engage with the family and also that they will build their own support systems abroad. Many siblings and their families thrive. Not sure why people think Harry and Meghan and their kids cannot thrive in Montecito.
@@user-ix1yb5yg2o There are no kids!!!
You're on point, Shauna! Everything about the kids will always seem off due to their own actions. Love your content!
Thank you 💕
i subscribe to your channel but am unable to comment 😔
@@richardpoulsen5502Didn't you just comment?
i did but only by putting my comment under some1 elses.i cant comment invidually
@@richardpoulsen5502 But you just have. 🤣
It really bothers me that the children are never seen! And how MM hid birth certificates which is basic public knowledge.
It bothers you that Meghan doesn’t show you her children? 🤣
@@princetonscholar5723
There's something fishy going on.
@@princetonscholar5723Well, no one likes being lied to. It’s possible she has lied to the world. Not good.
@@tracieh215 Anything is “possible”. But for now, the Sussex children will be kept from the nutty Derangers. And that’s a WIN.
Seeing as how litigious the pair are I am surprised nothing has been cleared up about 'the fake bump'. I would hate it if the press questioned that about me and my baby was totally legitimate. Her and Harry obviously don't mind. All hell breaks lose when Pierce Morgan says she lied in the OW interview, but fake baby...not a word. 🤔
I agree. And knowing M, it's so odd that she wouldn't talk about morning sickness, or carrying high or low, or how brutal the experience is for women, or maybe how lucky she was to feel well because all the yoga, etc etc etc
Never thought of that at all but you’re right !
They presented a fake baby to the press that day for sure, they had no Archie yet, I think they were booted out of the RF for their lies about her pregnancy or surrogate.
Do you really think that the British RF and the whole Establishment would have the kids' name on its site if they did not exist? Come on now!
Exactly what I think Cheryl Anne.
Very good video. I suspect that part of the reason for the children's lack of exposure is Markle's view of her brand. Her brand does not include children mainly because she is aware, from her own childhood, of how children steal the spotlight. When she is out in public she wants everyone to look at her not her kids. She seemed (to me ) to signal this during the coronation. The reason for her non-attendance was that she was having a party for Archie. However, instead of photos or film of her making cakes or blowing up balloons she releases footage of her hiking in the hills with her entourage and no kids in sight. Markle was promoting her own image even on her son's birthday.
I think you make a very good point. I would give the Sussexes credit for respecting their young children's right to privacy and not releasing their pictures, but I suspect your reasoning is more in keeping with Meghan's character.
👍🏻
Excellent point. 👍👍
I agree. She could have shown herself getting ready for party and one of Archie blowing out candles from behind his head or a closeup of just lips and candles. She could have made it work and had a great little article that kept her in the pr mode.
🎯!!
From the strange bulletin posted on Buckingham Palace to the even stranger 'birth certificate for Archie with 'father's name' Harry, instead of his legal name Henry. From the fact that the child was so wrapped up when they showed it to the American tv company news team, that we couldn't see his face properly and lets not forget the burgeoning bump that rose and fell from morning to afternoon. I don't know what they were thinking...(they were thinking, weren't they??), or were they plotting. There are two children, we've seen them but are they THEIR children? I find it despicable that they are using two innocent children as pawns in their sick games. Personally, I couldn't care less if they produced photos or not as they becoming more irrelevant by the day.
No doubts definitely no children.
Why is he never around for their bifthdays.
Parents just cant stop bragging about their children
No 2 photos look like the same kids etc. Etc.
I don’t ever want to see them. The PRICE will be way too high. 😮
One can only speculate whether the children exist. If they do, it really defies logic that there haven’t been regular photos. Most parents are proud of their kids, and showing photos is what regular folk do. I think that’s partly why the Wales’ show their kids on a regular basis.
One of the reasons that the Wales regularly show their children is that they are in direct line to the throne. Who knows the reason for the Harkles' behaviour regarding anything anf if they explain, one ca be sure that the opposite is true.
Children born via surrogacy
She would hate the princess lilly to have more coverage than the markell
It may be regular, but it seems to be less than Harry and William. It's not a crazy amount. Just an appropriate drip I think.
The Wales have a deal with the press. They produce photos of the children and photo ops restricted to a limited number of photographers, in return for being left alone the rest of the time.
You made a very good point, that one photo per year, either on a birthday or a Christmas card, would be sufficient. If Harry was traumatized by press intrusion into his life, then we can respect that he wants privacy for his children. But one photo per year is enough to quell rumors and still maintain privacy. IF THEY EXIST (which I do not think they do).
The kids don't exist period.
No kids, and parents always absents.
I don't give any credence to Harry's stories of worrying about being banished. Charles would have told him it was all nonsense. Were there no pictures of the children in the Netflix series? I imagine the children are invisible because Harry is paranoid.
They tried that Initially with Xmas card pics of Archie, but they blew it year 2, when at the chicken coop Xmas Pic the boy shown was long legged 6 yr old, and they said it was an artists rendition for safety. BS. So the annuals stopped.
Their sugars must be upset by this with all the gorgeous photos of the Wales children published on so many platforms.
You're right. I STILL think they rented the kids for pictures, OR hired a surrogate who could claim them back at any time. I can't help it. I just don't believe a 'real' parent would jug around a child on a walk with her arm around their neck... It looked like a doll! They always over-play their hand: Some movie stars restricted their interviews because they thought by remaining mysterious, it would help their careers... But taken to the extreme, what can happen is that people lose interest and move on to more accessible celebrities. Since they wanted to play games and show only a foot of Archie after his birth- It was so STUPID that people thought- "Okay- If you want to play games,- Go home, shut the curtains and STAY THERE!"
Hello Shauna, I truly respect Mr and Ms Mountbatten-Windsor’s right to protect their children’s privacy; the hypocrisy comes in when they demand, and use, the Prince and Princess title for them and merch off of them.
Why wouldn’t a genuine father take along his 5 year old son to the Warrior Games to view sporting events and meet military heroes?
The kids are Megan's power over the Royal Family. This is her exercising her power.
I am not so sure.....the RF MUST know the truth and unfortunately are covering up. It is not normal that either set of grand parents have not seen their grand children, and it has been verified that photos of the christening have been tampered with.
Jokes on her. The RF doesn’t care.
Why? They are NOT the direct line to the throne.
@@arvie89 What every grandmother fears, having to jump through hoops just to see your grandchild.
The BRF have moved on.
You are totally right, the harm they are doing to the "children " is disgusting.
Harry is the image of his dad. same small eyes to close together. same nose,
Yes and with the Spencer colouring!
Harry even looks more like a young Philip when Philip sported a beard in the Royal Navy.
why do they never go to the shops? never go to for a walk with their parents? its bizarre. if they exist it is criminal what they are doing to those children. i cant understand why someone doesnt look in to it properly.
They probably do, Montecito is a very low key community paparazzi are not welcomed there, anytime she gets papped it's because she's called them
They are locked in with staff 24/7
There are no kids!!!
Even the official announcement board of Archie's birth at the gate of Buckingham Palace was missing any required signatures.
“We never said we had any children, the British press said that, right? But seriously, can they not see that the paparazzi will be so much worse for the children because the paps will be fighting to get pictures of them.
When you think about how they claim to be harrassed by papparazzi, it's hard to comprehend how the paps NEVER catch a photo of them with the children.
No birthday photos?? No Mother’s Day photo?? No Father’s Day photo?? Starting to think there are no children??
Shrouded in secrecy reminds me very much of how Michael Jackson used to present his children with their heads covered or wearing masks. I understand the security aspect but it's just not normal behaviour. In school permission has to be granted for a child to appear in photographs taken during school activities so maybe this is why nothing has leaked from school but when i think of kids parties i imagine that the children never attend any for fear of photo being leaked. I think all of this is so detrimental to the children and their childhood's are being blighted. Look at the photo of William and his children released for father's day yesterday it was beautiful. No hiding the children away . They all appear happy and well adjusted. Who knows ho2 Harry's children are fairing. It's very sad.
At least you saw Michael regularly with his children, even if he did keep their faces covered in early years.
William and Catherine seem to manage the media very well and letting us see their children growing up...non of the media are haunting the children..if the sussexes bring out their children how would we know they are their real born to her body children..Afterall she was walking around megnant for 11 months... Unbelievable really and I think cruel
I did and you are so right! Her kids never change
Yes, I've been saying for a while that it's ridiculous that Harry who claims to have been so damaged by all the speculation regarding his parentage, would allow the same to happen to his own children. I don't particularly need to see the children, but it seems odd how we neverrrr see them, not even out and about as a family. It's just very strange.
And no stories about the children. I don’t understand that; I still delight in telling stories about my daughter as a little girl and she’s going to be 30 this year😻.
@@fairyprincess911 Other than 'Archie's first word was crocodile and now his favourite words are hydrate and drive safe'. Sure.
@@EvelineUK Crocodile 🐊 not alligator?😮💨😹
Sorry Shauna - I couldn’t care less if they don’t release pictures of the children. Being raised by the likes of these 2 parents, without a family support network around them, they’re better off being hidden away. The sad thing is when times are desperate they will be served up on that silver platter, to their own detriment.
After the divorce so she can keep all the money for herself, mark my words, the news feeds will be flooded with them and her tell all of course, how I survived a drug addict man child.
Shauna, you're assuming that those children actually live with Harry and Meg. I don't think they do. They don't act like parents with children at home. They don't take them anywhere. They are never seen outside or inside anywhere. They don't ever mention them, or tell cute little stories about them like all parents do. I think Archie lives in Britain with his real mother ( probably a maid from the palace, I remember there were rumors) and Lili was an adoption gone wrong and the mother changed her mind and kept her baby. I think the photos of her were of someone else's baby girl, maybe the photographer friend she has. I don't believe they are actually parenting anyone but Harry.
She's keeping the storyline going for relevancy and headlines, it's all she has, indirectly she is exploiting those kids, in the worst way.
Agree. And many of the photos were suspiciously photoshopped.
Totally agree. Where are the investigative reporters with receipts, they could make millions on this truthful revelation.
I would be happy to never see any other images of them again.
It is strange. I have heard so many different theories but I really don't know what to believe. As far as I know they never talk about them. The birth story in Spare was unbelievable I mean it actually was unbelievable. Who in their right mind would even believe that story is nuts.
Biologically, these kids are as much Harry's as Michael Jackson's own kids.
If they exist, I think they are Henry's, well Archie anyhow, but not hers therefore forget about LOS.
Indeed, highly unusual. I wonder what their long game is. Why would someone who has lived and lives amidst public doubts about his paternity do that to his own children?
Does not compute.
Yes! You would think Harry would understand how such speculation haunts you.
It's simple. They will show the children when they are offered enough money to show them. They don't care about the children's feelings. If they did, they would let them see their families to include grandfathers and cousins.
Well Netflix offered them $100m, wasn’t that enough?
@@Desertflower743 Not with the lifestyle they are living, the multiple lawsuits Harry takes out etc. It sounds like a huge amount of money but it will slip through their fingers very easily.
Didn't King Charles wish him on the day saying "And happy birthday to Archie, 'wherever' he is"?
Yes it is crazy . Im beginning to wonder. Do those kids really exist? If they do not, what did Harry get himself into.
The Queen apparently said it some time ago. They're both quite mad.
😂
Harry was well aware who his dad was and when Hewitt and Diana met
Well documented that he knew
Wow! So sad he feels the need to manipulate even that…I believed him!
Very true. The crazy thing to me is you look at a man coming up to his 40s, he definitely has lots of Windsor traits. He looks like his father, his grandmother his uncles. No denying his credential as a royal.
Friends of mine lived in Ebford at that time and villagers were extremely discreet. Don’t believe everything you read!!
Harry was basically accusing his mother if having affairs BEFORE he was even born!!!
Harry is definitely Charles Son...no doubt about that. When Diana got pregnant with the boys, she was very much in love with Charles and never had an affair. Her affairs came later!!
I have often wondered if they really do exist. The two are known for their tall tales.
You can't miss (grandchildren) what you haven't seen.
I also found very odd that, during his january interviews, Harry didn't mentioned anything about being worried for his family, especially the children, given the flooding in Montecito at the time.
On Jan. 9 he was in NY filming his interview with Stephen Colbert while back in Montecito the entire community was ordered to evacuate due to heavy rainfall. And I don't remember him to show any worry about it. Or any news regarding Meghan and children. And that really was a near cathastophic event.
H&M created mystery and speculation around these children from the get go. It's disasterous for the kids. Why would Harry allow this after what he went through ?
@@ln8116 Meg told him to!!!
When you think about the children of celebrities such as Jennifer Garner, Julia Roberts, Ryan Reynolds, etc., they are not overly photographed and in the news. Still you see them occasionally at an event or out shopping. You know they exist and imagine they are being appropriately exposed to the world by their parents and are well-treated by the public. True, no celebrity owes the public anything from their private life. But H and M’s behavior is so erratic that it makes one wonder if they are even capable of caring for children.
In her Cut interview, she picked Archie up from school. How did they have every parent and employee sign NDA's? No one has ever come forward and confirmed they have seen Archie at school...but the reporter described the interaction with Markle and the homeless guy. Very strange
I'm surprised there was no photos of Harry and "his" 2 children on Father's Day.
Bless their little hearts whoever they are
You are so very kind. You are taking a win-win tactic that is rare and very generous. I am with those who are of the opinion there are not two children who live with them. There might be an Archie, but I don’t think there’s a Lily. And under no circumstances do I believe her first pregnancy was real. I’ve seen way too many problems with her bump to believe she didn’t do something shady. But I love your channel anyway.❤
We all have something negative in our childhoods.
Spot on! 👍 For two new parents, they are remarkably silent about their children's milestones--and these two aren't silent about much. I've not heard Harry say but maybe once, "When my son was born..." which is a momentous hallmark for ANY OTHER MAN. It's always "my family" not "my children". Completely and utterly odd.
At court he said " to protect Meghan" yet nothing about protecting his children? Odd....
@@lisejacquelinerigault2575 Good point!
Talks about his todger but not his children😵💫
I will probably be in the minority, but I do think that the Sussex's are not obligated to issue regular photos of their children. They are not working royals like William and Catherine. I respect their right to keep their children out of the public gaze.
Having said that, I do think it is strange that we never see them out and about with the children. Last year, Harry played a lot of polo, and you would expect his children to be there running around playing with the other children. When William plays polo, Catherine and children are there, and have been from a young age. On Archies birthday last year Harry was playing polo, but the children were not there. That seems strange.
Yes I think you are right. I just thought even one family portrait once a year would end speculation.
It's very inconsistent behaviour- but that's the Sussexes isn't it
They’re are not going to be very well socialised if they don’t start letting them leave the house soon!
If the children really do exist, and really do have royal titles, imagine the shock they will feel when they become teenagers/adults and emerge into the world. Journalists and photographers will surely hound them and they won't have a clue what to do. William and Catherine's children will know what to expect having been raised knowing that people want to see them. I think Harry and Meghan are doing their children a great disservice by not preparing them for the real world. If they were just celebrities children, then I can agree that many celebrities keep their children's images private because their children don't have to be famous just because their parents are. However, the alleged Sussex children are a part of the royal family and have been born into fame. They can't possibly hide forever.
You’re right they are not obligated, but as some replies stated here, the children are of great interest to the public and their parents are public figures. They seem to want to deny reality of “World Wide Fame”. Can’t control the press, like Princess Diana tried to.
You are right. And they are so blurry, i would never recognize them in person
“melodrama-cito” love that !
I am so pleased you brought this subject up, the children in the photos never change and I thought I was the only one who noticed.
The kids do not exist, period. Just borrowed as and when.
If IPP status somehow covers up the whole children debacle, real or imaginary, no wonder they want it so bad. And access to other people’s private data (apparently) would sure give an edge to a political run of some sort.
If this was happening to any other couple in the USA, child protective service would knock on the door to check on the children.
I totally agree. It should be checked out. Not seeing children is not natural. God forbid they are being imprisoned and abused. I worry they need help. It would be best if it's true that they don't really exist imo.
@@myrarowlands9216 their former house maid gave an interview and said that she never saw any children in the house, not even the picture of the children. Also, she said they don't live there most of the time. The only child she has ever seen was when Harry's cousin came to visit with her child. Allegedly. Weird.
@@Sehara The truth can't come soon enough and it will eventually.
The photo of a red haired little girl in a blue dress issued by the Harkles in 2022 is NOT Lilibet, she's a child.model called Rebecca Cord - Google her and you will see.
As for Archie, photos and a video of a child purporting to be him have shown a number of different children, one of whom was definitely the son of a friend. I believe we have been extensively misled, especially as both Thomas Markle and Samantha have stated that Meghan had a hysterectomy at age 29.
Samantha also stated in a YT video, that Methane had her eggs frozen. She flew to LA to pick them up for her first “pregnancy”. She also expressed the view that it could have been a wonderful story for others who grow their family through surrogacy. Now this was when they were members of the RF, and the child is in the line of succession. This will prove quite embarrassing to the RF if the truth ever be told.
@@spiritcreek9813 Well let’s hope it is told.
This is right!!!!!!!!
The so called Archie resembles August who would be a Cousin but has anyone ever seen a genuine photo of the two Cousins together for proof. You can resemble your Cousin but I would like to see both together before I believe hearsay or rumours.
If they do exist they are either being used, abused or they are ashamed of them. We will know one day when the kids can escape.
It is a bit frightening. I never really took stock of the "do they don't they exist" question until now. One of the hallmarks of child abuse is secrecy anther is isolation from others. Ev.en presidents show and are proud of their children.
In one respect, I get wanting to protect the children from too much press or for security. However, given the way every celebrity issues some photos from time to time, especially with the Princess of Wales taking photos herself and sharing those, what do the Montecito pair think they are doing? Repeatedly having references to their children without even saying anything about why the pictures are all two years old at least? Maybe Harry feels he is doing things for Archie and Lilibet behind the scenes at home that Charles didn't do for him, but even then, it's comparing apples to I-phones. Charles, as a working royal with a first tumultuous relationship with the mother of his children, then trying to navigate their grief and support them without denigrating Diana (I doubt Charles ever trash talked about Diana to William or Harry), and dealing with his sons' coolness to Camilla, etc etc? Harry, meanwhile, just talks trash about his family, goes to glitzy parties and events, and holds out his hand for more cash. Apples and I-phones, guys.
I personally do not understand this obsession with wanting to see Harry and Meghans kids. Why do people want to see them? They are 2 and 4yrs old. How often do you post photos of your kids to the public?
William and Catherines children are in direct line of succession and it is part of the unwritten understanding that the royals have with the public to allow the public to 'watch the children grow up' as it were. William and Catherine therefore release photos for birthdays, christmas etc and attend big royal events with their kids. Harry has no such obligation. He is now a celebrity and most celebrities keep their kids well hidden from the public especially when the kids are very young. I see nothing wrong with Harry wanting to keep his kids in the background and away from cameras
I agree with you on this Shauna. I cannot believe that H&M don't know about the speculation around the existence which, if the children were to read them when older, would be devastating to those kids...cruelty in the scale of the Hewitt rumours. It's the one area I prefer not to comment on as I don't want to add to the trolling in the happy instance they do exist...
Yes…well that is my point! I think they do exist but a lot of harm is being done to their future due to the speculation.
@@thevintageread absolutely...much as the whole hiding the kids and secrecy around their births etc make a great conspiracy theory, there's too much of a possibility they exist so their parents games around them are ultimately very very harmful...sad.
They do exist, just not children of Megsie and Hank!
@@colleenloucks we might get to know when then the inevitable divorce happens...🤔🤷
If Pa had been there for him at all times and Mummy hadn't died and William wasn't going to be king and . . . H is a wound-collector. He seeks them out. Footage and pics from the past show H engaged with his cousins in family activities/privileges. But he doesn't value that b/c he feels entitled to it. It's not enough for H b/c he's self-centered, greedy and insatiable. He noticed and resented when he thought someone else got more than he wanted. The petty grievances he'd held onto since childhood and published in Waagh! are cringeworthy.
I figure meg is trying to keep them exclusive to use when she NEEDS them to cause a major stir for press! **BUT, given their extreme exclusivity at this point, how are those two kids not HIGHLY stalked by paparazzi because surely there would be a very large price for pics of them because of this??? HOW ON EARTH DO they have no paparazzi photos??? Surely they leave their home base for dr appt's/ archies school, etc...?? Not even pics of them in the car..... bizzare
Never viewed it from that perspective Shauna, good pointe. 👍
You’re absolutely correct Shauna. It’s the one question my friends and I keep asking 😕😕 I’d love to know what the end game is? 🤫
Yes it just seems so counter productive!
To get them in Los which has happened
Difficult to post photos of 'your' children when people will recognise them as being someone else's!!!!
‘arry didnt hear this til 2014. Once again ‘arry’s truth.
Those poor kids - IF they exist are doomed now.
I wonder if their children ever get to see the light of day. If they did, I'm sure we would have more photos of them even if it's just them in the backyard or whatever it's called when you own a mansion. It seems they keep them hidden away in their home. Nobody even talks about them like...yes, my children play with their children or, I saw them in such and such a store or anything like that. What about their nanny? Who is it even? If they keep them so hidden away, their kids won't know how to interact with other children, or adults even. It really is a disservice to the children to do that.
If it’s happening, it’s abuse.
And you have an album by James Taylor behind you!
Shauna, you rock!!!
Beautiful album x
I know right I love checking out the shelves behind Shauna.😂
@@BevHart Shauna is our star, isn't she!
@@thevintageread Everything is beautiful about JT, wink wink!🙃
The photo of them walking up the drive, Has Harry with one child on his shoulders. If it was accurate, the collar of his shirt would not be visible, yet there it is for the whole world to see!
Photoshopped? It certainly was/is!
Love your LPs in the background ❤
Thank you! 😄
I wonder if the kids have some genetic and/or behavior issues.
Maybe some autism or Down syndrome? And they’re ashamed?
I also wonder if they have behavior issues because their parents are so odd. And dad has admitted to drug use.
Idk 🤷🏼♀️ I’m just guessing …
I remember looking at Archie's eyes during that time she was reading him a story and wondered if he had downs
I was thinking the same. Maybe there are some health issues preventing the kids from being photographed .
I’m surprised there’s been zero photo leaks, do the children actually play with any other little human.
The day they reunite with Charles & RF will be one word, awkward. Picture that !
Yes you are right! No leaks at all…it’s really strange.
I was thinking the same thing several weeks ago with The Australian Womens Weekly! Plenty of articles about the H & M’s children but always the same photos from several years ago. You would think they would give up writing about them!
I missed that! It is so strange…
I'm not invested in these kids. No matter if they start showing them in public, i wouldn't much care. It's enough to see Louis, Charlotte and George and getting to know their personalities, watching them grow.
I feel for Harry's kids and their isolation with toxic parents, but am not genuinly interested in what they do.
Great points! They really are causing so much speculation. Very strange behavior.
Well said . I agree. it is suspicious because there is no pictures or sightings of the children. Take care & God bless ❤
If the kids do exist, and I am dubious, they are going to be so screwed up from this bizarre secretive upbringing. It would be so sad if that is what’s happening.
I think we’ll see updated photos when someone offers enough cash.
I just discovered your channel yesterday and I'm completely addicted!!! ❤
I love your channel, I hope it really starts to grow!!!!❤❤❤❤
Hello from Darwin Australia 😊
Hello there! 💗
They never spoke about her “pregnancies” like normal people do. Never speak about the “children” like Archie does this or Lily does that. No pictures of them at other people’s homes playing with other children or photos with the parents or Doria. I feel bad for the children if they are really there. You would think someone has seen them but perhaps afraid of being sued if they say anything. Prisoners in their own home.
Reminds me of a book I read..it was called Flowers in the Attic...you can even compare it with a movie called Mommy dearest..
No utrus to get pregnant lies mental health services
Harry once said that Archie keeps very busy and Lili is finding her voice.
Meaning: Archie is wrecking the place and Lili is screaming the place down.
@@sarahhayse-gregson689 lol, right, missed that.
Actual parents understand how actual children work...how they act, how they grow, milestones, etc. H& M don't know anything about these things and arrogantly thought they could fake it. 😂😂😂
They don't have actual children in their custody. If they even exist at all.
You are so right but l just don’t understand why no one else in the world sees this , beats me !!!
I can absolutely understand wanting to keep the kids private and to protect them from overexposure. I know Georges Clooney and his wife do the same for their kids. That said, the big difference is: by having royal titles, and the kids being prince and princess, they kind of "belong" to the subjects of King Charles. Royalty is not like a celebrity - royal members have an obligation to be present and available to the subjects. So if you want to protect your kids like a celebrity, go full mainstream, outside of the RF by not having titles. Then you can be a private citizen as much as you want. If you use Royal titles, you are to be expected to be more visible. You can then do like the Prince and Princess of Wales and control what is shown. Harry and Meghan cannot have their cake and eat it too.
You have amazing perspective. Love your channel! Thank you for what you do!
I appreciate that!
There are many celebrities who protect their children, don’t let photos of them be in the press but you see many photos of them with their children but the children’s faces are blurred out. It’s very weird
My question is why did Harry agree to this idiocy? Did they think they can fool the RF and the public for as long as they want about these kids?
I don't believe him about thinking Hewett was his dad and being afraid he would be thrown out of the family, or he would have been trying to be such a great son, thinking he was so good, they would never get rid of him.
Ahhh good point…it’s so sad for those children. Love your videos!
Thank you!
What i find fascinating is m has never shopped for kids clothing.
Well said. God knows what kind of secrets they're hiding.
When their kids turn twenty one, will we see the same tired old photos in Hello and People magazines, with a headline, "Where Are They Today?".
On a serious note, I agree with you. Harry is hardly the thoughtful or loving father for what he and Meghan are doing to his children (if they exist or are his). I have doubts they exist because both parents make such generalised and sometimes preposterous remarks about them. Really off.
I can imagine!
I’m loving your album collection, in fact so many are in mine! Bob Seger, Sound of Music, James Taylor, Barbra Streisand. Great choices.
My guess is the Harkles are holding on to show photos of the children until they think they will get mega bucks for them. The day might then arrive when they are required to obtain DNA tests.
Crazy & damaging for sure. 😩. Those poor kids.