US Marines Land on HMS Prince of Wales in Preparation for Russia Mission
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 10. 2023
- U.S. Marines with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 365 conducted carrier qualifications aboard HMS Prince of Wales, preparing for the following NATO missions, which will most likely be located around the Black Sea. VMM-365 is a subordinate unit of the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing, the aviation combat element of II Marine Expeditionary Force.
14 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing pilots qualified to operate from the deck of HMS Prince of Wales - one element of a critical theme of the Portsmouth-based warship’s autumn deployment to the Naval Station Norfolk: interaction and cooperation between the US and UK.
Thanks for watching.
Hope you enjoy it !!
🔔 Subscribe for more videos just like this: / @nighthawkvets
Before you go, you might also like,
Latest Videos: • Video
Similar Video: • US F-35 Showing Its In...
Popular This Week: • Tank + Boat + Cargo = ...
For Business Inquiries, Please contact:
McLeeEnfieldF117pilot@gmail.com.
*The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense visual information does not imply or constitute DOD endorsement.
*The Department of Defense [nor a respective Military Service or any other DOD Component] does not approve, endorse, or authorize this company, its products, or its services.
#MV22Osprey #ukrainewar #HMSPrinceofWales - Věda a technologie
When I was in the British Army I occasionally worked with US Service personnel. They were always good natured, funny and friendly but at the same time professional and dedicated. I’m proud that the UK has such good friends and allies, especially now when our enemies are trying to undermine our democracies. God bless all those who stand ready to protect us from the evil in this world. 🇺🇸🇬🇧
I'm told their grub's tastier
Maybe you should worry about the undermining of democracy currently going on in America and here in the UK.
@@Makeyourselfbig What part of Russia or China are from ?
!@@Makeyourselfbig As a voter that is YOUR RESPONVCIBILTY! What do YOU propose to do about it
@@Makeyourselfbig Go and live in Russia and then compare it with this country
UK and US - brothers in arms, always.
The British Royal Marines have a unique symbiotic relationship with the USMC. I was a grunt at Camp Lejuene and there were Royal Marine officers embedded within the division and our regiment. They did not have command authority over units but they were shown all military respect as advisors and observers.
It’s always great to see our respective forces, working so well together.🇬🇧🇺🇸
Beautiful ship & a big welcome to the Royal Navy & all our British allies. Thanks to allow serving, (Including our British friends), those who have, and those who will in the future. FLY NAVY!!!
Great to see both sides working closely together, I have to say the pilots of the ospreys are great to watch there must be some skill in what they do.
The only thing more impressive than flight ops on the boat is night flight ops on the boat. FLY NAVY!!!@@David-ws6zr
Great to see the excellent cooperation between the mighty US Navy & Marine Corp & our Royal Navy & long may it continue !!
A great example of two professional navies working together in close unison with a long established history together on the high seas showing how it should be done.
Semper Fi Marines, Happy Birthday. Still rememmber fondly my days in the Corps and having a liberty with our RM 'cousins".
Great professional organised military the best in the world . Prevention is better than the cure, the enemy is watching and is on notice .
2:02 guys last name is warrior in spanish...epic.
Well done all, Be Safe!!
Go My Beautiful American Marines!!! Semper Fi!!!!! usususususus......🥰😍🤗🙏❤🤍💙💪🙏👍💯👑🪖🎨🎉🎊🔥
They said it was very clean, that's because they very kindly threw out crap out of their aircraft.😂😂
Great video.. It's interesting that both ships were built with the f35 in mind, but also great for ospreys and other air craft can operate on them too.. I guess it's a good opertunity also for new us marine f35 pilots to practice landing and taking off hm's prince of Wales...... I've heard rumours of a third aircraft carrier is being built... ..
Glad you enjoyed it
So you have been duped by a "Navy News" article written three years ago for April fools day. There were plans for 3 the third was for Frnce who pulled out of the idea.
No third boat mate...............Navy should have gone ahead with selling the Prince of Wales to India, we haven't enough aircraft for 2 let alone 3 boats!
@@andrewb2475 no thay should not sell one to India... Because you need 3 boats for rotation purposes.. Hense the rumour for a third aircraft carrier.. There also thinking of putting catapult symptoms on them for using other aircraft
...
QE class carrier is not 6th gen. If anything it would tie the Ford Class Carriers
Well done lads! I bloody love the Americans! Britain,America. Great allies!!
amazing osprey
It was designed to be a Strike Carrier not an LPH
No that misconception is only in your mind. It was designed to be whatever the opration or tasking required. be that carrier strike, amphibious support, Interoperability or hospital ship.
But of course I know why you made the comment. Just trying to be 'clever' right?
Imagine going out on a training expedition and getting proper Fish & Chips :-)
Nice imagination, sir 🫡
More than fish and chips. British aircraft carrier has a pub on board! Marines will be looking forward to having a few pints while debrief their missions at the pub!
@@user-pj3ch8ou2h I would sooner have our royal navy sailors and crew 3 sheets to the wind than deprive them of their alcohol rations
@@dbz9393 No Rum for them, what?
The daily rum ration was withdrawn in the 70s if I recall correctly..
5:45 poor fish :(
Bravo Sierra
Why would any country F... with the USA - UK.
What’s with the chucking pallets out the back? Nearly sunk my yacht hitting man made wooden waste mid Atlantic one time. Jeez😢
Lets face it, we are all waiting for the Gunship version of the V-22 Osprey
What an opportunity if that happened to call it a 'V22 Airwolf '
So eine schwachsinnige Überschrift.
Great technology nonetheless I would rather have upgraded harriers jump jets.
The technology was available unfortunately expensive.
Nonetheless a great aeroplane from USA
If you mean the F-35 its a great aeroplane from the USA and the UK - the only Tier One Partner which builds 20% of every F-35 built.
Worked with yanks in Afghanistan, great blokes
Gigantic number of people all round the World, esp Britons will vehemently disagree with you re their military imperialist class.
@@RS-xx9ve And Gigantic number of people all round the World, esp Russians will vehemently agree you re China's military imperialist class.
@@Only1199 No AMERICA'S imperialist class.
I think there is at least one charge to be brought against these individuals e.g. exhibiting behaviour and / or conduct likely to create public disturbance. In short: being way too cool!!
👍
Pip Pip!!
What's the Russian Mission?
Clickbait.
One way to make it look like the deck is full I guess.
Oh give up Soft Lad .... PoW was tasked to test the new Bedford Array landing light system and get SRVL up to operational standards. It used 3 US / UK shared orange wired F-35 aircraft to analyse and data log the testing.
So why would the carrier have a full deck when a risky new procedure is being tested? 🤦♂
Does POW have any working F35s or the quota is still on the QE.
Never seen a full flight deck of planes. In fact one plane would be good.
If you bothered to spend two minutes on google, you would find out that there is no point buying a ton of aircraft for a ship that is still carrying out trials.
@@Bob10009
NAS's are usually rotated
between ship and shore
The UK F-35s are operated by both RAF and FAA squadrons. None are attached to a specific ship and join as required from wherever required when a carrier sails. They leave when the carrier returns to home port.
A brief search would have shown you plenty of aircraft on both decks over many months. In fact just last month PoW had 8 on board for a NATO exercise. Yes 8 was all that were required for that exercise.
We currently have 35 x F-35s: 3 are based in California with 17 T & E Squadron and the rest are operated by 809 NAS, 617 RAF and 217 RAF Squadrons.
🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇸👍
Thank you for keeping the numbers up! UK Govt. hates paying for it's armed forces and needs all the charity it can get!
agree, although, British Government love taking the plaudits, when our military are successful in an operation. They make me sick.
you voted for them
@@dbz9393
Nobody votes for any of the
policies they adopt
That's all decided in Davos
@@stephenchappell7512 they do
Britain hates wasting its money on American imperialism. Fortunately the era of the Empire of Lies is coming to an end. As shown in Afghanistan.
nothing in the way of them landing ?
Might as well have the USA land aeroplanes on the UK carrier as the RN can't afford any of their own!
They can afford them ,but they p*ss the money up on crap and pensions because we have inept leaders.
Only a few days ago the announcement of 130+ air craft to operate of the two carriers so you're bloody wrong there.
@@goodshipkaraboudjan my comment was in 2023. how many have they got now?
May as well, we don’t have enough planes to put on it
Oh look another nugget joins us writing the same old bollocks ....
I mean why?
We have 35 x F-35s so more than enough to operate the carriers in peacetime. We have ordered and paid for 48 with further funding for another 30. Our overall requirement will be for 138 x F-35s.
"don’t have enough planes to put on it"
🤦♂🤦♂😂😂
@@1chish 30, one was lost in an accident and 4 are test jets in the US, get your numbers right if you are going to attempt to make a point
@@vickers2007 Regardless of accuracy of numbers my point was well made against the nonsense in your OP. Plus you need to check your delivery dates first then Wing Commnander.
Let me quote from Lockheed Martin as of March 25th (earlier reported by the MoD on March 20th):
"Acceptance of the final two RAF TR-2 F-35 aircraft occurred in November. The jets were then delivered to the RAF at 17 Test and Evaluation Squadron, Edwards Air Force Base, in support of a military exercise prior to their final ferry to RAF Marham. Both jets arrived at RAF Marham last week"
The LM numbers were BK34 and BK35. Less the one that crashed gives 34 operational aircraft. My bad for one.
The 4th F-35 to Edwards was a temporary addition for that specific exercise with the last two delivery airframes and returned to the UK with those two. To consider the 3 in California as somehow 'non-operational does not stand scrutiny.
Technically my number was one low because BK36 (ZM170) and BK37 (ZM171), the first TR-3 aircraft, are actually flying from Fort Worth now in RAF hands but not yet handed over to RAF Marham.
So can we agree on 36 operational F-35s?
Love some of the non military british comments...why so pessimistic 😂😂
Royal Navy loves other countries planes landing on it's aircraft carrier.............gives the crew training as we don't have any of our own!😂
I'm sad to say your comment isn't even satire
It's not satire dude, HMS Prince of Wales has no aircraft which makes it a boat!@@stephenchappell7512
Poor fish
Tilt rotor Osprey widow makers
Only in the minds of gullible neophytes.
Smh
I sense clickbait
Amazing ! They've actually found a use for it. Well done.
Someone quoted on the video obviously doesn't know history as far back as 1812-1815.🤣
What happened then?
@@jmbaka007 US tried to invade Canada while Britain had its pants down fighting Napoleon. Both Napoleon and the US failed in their endeavours, so the Americans went and burned down Toronto. Britain then proceeded to land in Washington DC and burned it to the ground. Yanks weren't too chuffed.
Don't the USA lose every conflict they get involved in?
USA 🇺🇸 never loses Battle Field Conflicts. An enemy fighting with the USA on the battlefield…. Is going to die! What your talking about is a resolution. To end a hustle open ended conflict (The USA loses in the political arena.) Vietnam Afghanistan lost 10xs the amount of people. Compare to the USA. What politicians can never do….is decide whether to just to go home. Or inflict more pain on the enemy? Why lose more people. For something you’re not intending to take? War and Peace the eternal question.
Always suspected our "carriers" wou;d just end up as glorified landing ships. Never thought it would be for the yanks though. Maybe we should charge them rent.
Should they just be discarding wooden pallets into the sea. Let’s just add to the environmental crap that floating around. Disgraceful.
Waste of money. We cannot afford these ships. Presence in the Pacific why?
😴😴
British interests are worldwide. Google "Aircraft Carrier Camden New Journal".
@@lesmorley9628 - daft reply > a waste of finger tapping
Projection of Britain's global interests for one. Protection of our staunchest allies for another, including the West Coast of America, Canada, plus New Zealand & Australia. You know those great countries that have always stood steadfastly at our side when we needed & counted on them the most in our hours of need. Their protection is our protection.
No money for the jets, no cash for troops and copters, I see the a great US rental earner.
Comments by US Navy personnel have proved that the Royal Navy is the number one Navy in the world.
@johnawalker9261 What you would expect , we've been @ it longer than any other Navy in the World. but don't mind passing on info or technology to OUR ALLIES.
Brits say same about the US. It’s called mutual respect
wish we had just bought sea stallions from the USA instead of getting the merlins.....
I suppose you would also want the Huey instead of the Lynx
Totally different class of chopper 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
The Merlin is British that's why we have it. Now if we got everything from other countries, where would you be? Paying over the odds for other people's technology. That's why we have the Merlin helicopter's so we don't pay over the odds and we retain our own helicopter industry!
@@davarosmith1334 Sea Stallion is in the Chinook class, not the Merlin. It's far bigger than Merlin.
@@davarosmith1334we don't pay over the odds? 😅 The British armed forces procurement is an absolute shambles
Hubris. If this carrier ever enters the Black Sea Russia will sink it and its Ospreys since under the Convention of Montreaux no foreign warships are allowed to operate their in time of war without being taken as a cobelligerent. Russia has deployed four of its high altitude, 2000 kph Mig-31 aircraft to the Black Sea armed with Kinzyl hypersonic missiles for this purpose so we need less military hubris and more realistic thinking from our politicians else we are off to WWIII that can only end in a nuclear winter.
Hilarious.
Muppet. RN can if invited visit it's NATO allies Romania, Bulgaria & Turkey in the Black Sea anytime.
They would of course be unwise to head to Odessa or anywhere near the conflict zone around occupied Crimean peninsula, without being seen as a legitimate target.
But we're Adolf Pootler & ruZZia be so stupid as to launch an unprovoked attack on a visiting NATO members vessel visiting another NATO countries territorial waters would automatically trigger Article 5.
"Convention of Montreaux"(sic)
Montreux Convention
Well they won't be deploying warships because Ukraine has sunk most of them. 😂
Very brave of US Personnel to land on HMS Prince of Wales!
Are they not aware of its useless service history to date.
They really should disembark before it breaks down again.
Thanks for your support. Glad not to have you in mind when I was in a war on behalf of the Crown.
And every American aircraft carrier is always in perfect working order, huh?
Britain should do without contact with America after our armed forces were called shit by that American commander.
America needs Britain more than Britain needs America though.
Embarrassing we don't have enough aircraft to fill 2 small Carriers, what a joke
It's not ideal, to be sure. The RAF is in charge of aircraft procurement and aircrew training.
HM Government is right to pursue a maritime defence strategy.
We have ordered and paid for atleast 72 F35s BUT the US have not delivered them all yet, the issue is the US not the UK ! At this time, we only have enough to just about operate one carrier !
@@ynwa3476 "We have ordered and paid for atleast 72 F35s"(sic)
Incorrect. The UK has ordered 48 and received 37. No order for anything past 48 has been placed. The MoD keeps hemming and hawing about a second order but have yet to sign on the dotted line.
"the issue is the US not the UK ! "(sic)
Incorrect again. As the CEO of Lockheed Martin UK - Paul Livingston - announced last December, the UK is refusing to exercise its options and accept delivery of current production lot F-35Bs due to lack of money. It is also doing the same with the E-7 and A400.
@@ynwa3476Plus the spiralling cost of the F-35 which was supposed to be a cheap stealth fighter for NATO means we had to halve our order just like everyone else did.
@@B-A-L Exactly.