AMD Destroys Nvidia with FSR 3
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 08. 2023
- With the recent presentation of FSR 3, AMD has made it possible for every gamer to experience the technology similar to DLSS 3, but without needing the latest GPU, they have really done gamers a favor this time!
Thank You for Watching this Video, if you enjoyed it Subscribe to the Channel for more.
Music Credit: $werve, Grioten, DAY$OKEE - MUDD
If you want to be part of some big giveaways that are always happening, Join my Discord Server so you can stay in touch with me and the community that enjoys Gaming, PC Tech Memes and General Stuff:
/ discord
You can Find me on other social Media Accounts where I constantly Post Memes, Informative Videos and Fun Gaming Content:
Instagram:
/ niktek.official
Twitter:
/ niktekofficial
For business inquiries and brand promotions, you can contact me in this email:
niktekchannel@gmail.com - Zábava
AMD should hire me at this point XD
For sure
Send me your CV 😎
i mean it sometimes feels like they already did lol
yea
True
AMD literally flexed so hard on Nvidia that they allowed Nvidia cards to use their own technology
Probably not gonna use fsr over dlss on my card
probably none cares@@MaksKuaka
@@MaksKuakaI have a 3060 so I definitely will use it. Big thanks for AMD
@@MaksKuaka well fair if you have a nvidia gpu dlss is better than fsr admittedly but supporting those who actually need that technology is far more important
@@MaksKuaka I had 2060s and will use Fsr 3.0 instead of dlss for frame generation that NVIDIA only gave for 40series card
the smartest thing AMD did, was to make FSR open source. allowing nvidia cards that don't have DLSS to not upgrade for overpriced models.
FSR literally just an algorithm based frame gen, any card can run it, so the true sentence is AMD not disable it for nvidia users.
@@bence2345 and make it open source for some nerds help them,
How is that smart for AMD lol you think AMD giving its best feature to nvidia cards is smart for AMD... that must be why AMD have so much market share huh... oh wait no.
Open source anything is turning out to be a strategic disaster for AMD, they are giving customers absolutely no reason to need or want their cards. Imagine if this situation was the other way around and Nvidia announced that they were allowing all AMD users to now use DLSS, it would be the stupidest thing Nvidia had ever done, AMD users would laugh their ass off - basically telling AMD users you dont need our cards you can use our features on your AMD card lol does that sound smart? well thats exactly what AMD are doing.
Nvidia dont care AT ALL that some users are sticking with older cards, they have the market share and more importantly the mind share of those users, when they upgrade - the likelihood of them upgrading to another nvidia card is massive because nvidia still has the exclusive features and AMD are giving all their features to Nvidia for free lol smart smart.
The actual smartest thing AMD did was announce the ability to use a lesser form of FSR at the driver level on their cards which you can switch on in any dx11/12 game, THAT is the smartest thing they did. Suddenly there is a reason to think about buying an AMD card instead of Nvidia because FINALLY there is something an AMD card can do that an Nvidia card cant... for the time being, and do you see what the difference is... its not open source, you cant use it on older cards and you cant use it on nvidia cards. Stop singing the praises of open source rubbish, you think it benefits everybody but its killing AMD, we clap for them today and then go and buy an Nvidia card tomorrow. They need exclusive features!
@@jinx20001
All you basically needed was this line as it's strong enough to stand on it's own.
"We clap for them today and then go and buy an Nvidia card tomorrow."
@@jinx20001 i don't know man. the 10 series still dominating steam hardware survey of the most used GPU. if AMD disturb the upgrading process. by making people not upgrade. that kinda only hurt nvidia.
Making FSR 3 compatible with essentially all DX11 and 12 games is truly a game changer. This just gives you yet another reason not to waste your money on NVIDIA now.
Great for 7900xt/7900xtx owners or maybe other 7000 series AMD card owners.
I'm back at it. Wanted to build a PC for couple years now but the miners ruined it. Now with the prices coming back to earth....this alone is enough...on principle...to buy amd hardware.
@@wadebrewer7212 Intel CPUs are good but draw far too much power now. 7800X3D has decent performance in games. Just get 32GB of DDR5 RAM at a decent frequency.
@charlesclarke7790 I have always liked AMD for their processors...pushing limits and they are outside the box. The integrated graphics in with CPU was always intriguing to me. Seems that has unfortunately gone to the way side of things. I hope those come back soon....they seemed like a really good stop gap for folks trying to get into pc gaming but couldn't afford a decent GPU at the time. Also great for SFF builds.
Interesting fact....VBA in excel uses a lot of GPU resource to run complicated script. At times some of the stuff I've built/written struggles on the standard business desktop machines but rubs fine on my rtx 3070 machine (also run cad at work and is why my computer over others is iver spec) found out about the GPU resources and VBA when we attempted to move a VERY heavily scripted workbook to a server where the "gpu" resource is shared across RAM amd the CPU...basically, 8mb of GPU resource was allocated to each user and the workbook all but refused to run most of the time. Surprisingly....watching resources on my 3070 machine, it would at times spike to about 40% gpu while running long, heavy VBA.
@@GodKitty677it’s for all graphics cards
the fact that it works on older cards too is just incredible
Only if devs implement it.
it's very normal, companies decide on purpose to abandon older products to force you to buy more stuff :(
@@6884Nvidia does it, I like more AMD.
Except the most important feature FG
@@TheGam3Br3akeR They did say it might not work someone already did it with the 1060 and 1070 and it works just fine. AMD just said that due to unforeseen incompatibility like but this is an open source software. If amd effed it up the community will try to fix it. That's both pros and cons of their open source
they didn't just throw shade at Nvidia, they threw the entire eclipse at them.
Berserk reference
Nvidia has abandoned the consumer gpu market anyway.
berserk reference
AMD did nothing wrong ...
This must be were all the AMD fanboys gather 😂
the fact you can enable fsr on every dx11 and 12 is a huge deal for all budget gpus
It's with adrenaline software, so AMD only. But I'm sure that modders will be very fast with dlss2fsr analog with FSR 3.
yeah but it's still "fake" performance
@@Efemische that is the fluid motion,or frame generation tech, not the fsr 3 which is like dlss
@@qbasic16 not really i played rd2 with 50 to 55 fps on medium to high settings on a flipping gtx 1650 laptop, without fsr the game was unplayable
@@qbasic16 ill take it, even if it mean to put on fake muscle on my R7 370.
1:16 my guy knew he dropped a bomb
No joke you just converted me from Nvidia to AMD. Thanks for caring AMD
Nvidia really speaks down to us like we're incompetent. I personally will never buy an Nvidia product ever again
They have a trillion $ in total net worth and are the top 5 companies in the world.
Intel isn't on this list
we are =/= were . You are illiterate.
Well, we keep buying their overpiced stuff so why shouldn't they become more and more arrogant realizing how easily they get away with that?
@@Ludak021 You are illiterate, "we're" = we are. Unless your being pedantic about the apostrophe.
@@aaroncruz9181only because of their bs "ai" conference, where they pushed everything towards ai.
They're overvalued and their products are severely overpriced
Similarly, I will never forget AMD's decision to sustain the AM4 for as long as it lasted from 2016, and saying goodbye with the 5800X3D. What a legendary chipset. What a company.
I got a 5800x3D recently and its a glorious cpu, although wish I could take better advantage of it since I still have a 1070 lol. Can't wait to get rid of that card and the driver issues it has.
They don't care what you remember or not. They care if you buy their GPUs and CPUs
AMD is atleast trying while Intel & Nvidia doesn't even care.
Ryzen launched in March 2017 but I wholeheartedly agree. I got my first AM4 board in early May of that year and I'm still using it! So glad I didn't go for the 7600K instead.
I've been a long supporter on intel. Changed to amd, got the 5800x3d...can't go back...EVER!
Nvidia's slogan is "The way it's meant to be played."
Little did we know that they were talking about playing their customers.
Amd are such savages. They did the same thing with g sync / freesync
This shows how much a proper competitive market means for consumers.
How does this generate them more money though? Giving more performance to old products is not a savvy business decision. There has to be a catch.
@@Felale catch is destroying the NVidia marketing so consumers won't buy their RTX40xx cards
@@Felale Reducing Nvidia GPU market share. Even if they don't maximize their profit off of this specific tech, the action itself can generate a net total larger profit in gained shares of the GPU market.
@@FelaleAMD latency reduction for FSR3 is locked to 7000 series. You can enable all the fake frames with horrible latency on all the other cards.
@@givikap120 Except fsr 3 works on nvidia video cards. So why buy amd when you can get Nvidia's features and amd's features at the same time?
this is why its always good if there are competitors in the market that push each other
Not just competition, but a sense of loyalty and gratitude to consumers. I've seen corporations try and nickel and dime their customers before. A famous example was Microsoft trying to prevent people sharing their owned games with friends. Sony were quick on their feet and made them look stupid. These companies need to realise that good consumerist policies are often rewarded.
"Loyalty and gratitude to consumers"
You actually believe companies care about consumers? Capitalist brainwashing at its finest. 😂
@@religion_is_bullshitthat's the AMD fanboys mindset, don't question it, especially on this channel
@@religion_is_bullshit Even if their intentions aren't pure. The effect is still beneficial to consumers. I'm as skeptical as the next guy but you can't deny that allowing new software to function on old hardware is a pretty cool move even if it's a chess move against Nvidia for revenue purposes. Either way AMD wins and so do the people who enjoy the products of a capitalist society. What capitalist product have you used to express your anti-capitalist rhetoric?
I dunno man. Compared to the late 90's early 2000's renaissance of GPUs with more than 3 chip manufacturers, today is still a joke.
We are just a bunch of battered and abused housewives that we actually believe small concessions like this are monumentally great or indicative of change when they are not.
Best edit ever, thank you so much for taking the time or make this. Much appreciated!
I have a 1080 Ti and set up FSR in "Six Days in Fallujah". The game's settings are "high" on a 1440p display. The FSR settings are "balanced" and quality is set to "ultra". My fps went from ~70 up to ~110. And it doesn't even look bad. Very nice, thanks for that. My next card is going to be a 7800 XT since my old card doesn't fit so good to my 7800X3D 😛
What's far more significant is the fact hat AMD says they're gonna bring it driver level so many games can work on it. That's a bigger win imo than compatibility with older hardware.
if they bring it to driver level, nvidia will quite literally be a joke to buy
Like FSR has driver level support. Which is just FSR1 because it's a post-processing effect that doesn't need engine data like motion vectors. The same will be true for "FSR3" via hyper RX so it will be a very different version of motion interpolation. More akin to what your TV does.
Which I'm not saying is pointless but if people complain about a bit of ghosting or artifacting in current DLSS/FSR implementations, they're gonna absolutely hate hyper RX.
just for the 7000 series
they still haven't brought fsr to driver level for vega 56. meaning u have to lose freesync to run it
@@cakedon driver level frame interpolation is gonna suck, get ready for a ghosting fiesta
Much respect to this company.
Competition is a great thing - for the customer.
Depends what competition.
@@IrrationalDelusion are there any product competition that will harm the customer?
cartels, lol@@amogoose2971
@@amogoose2971 If companies compete for becoming more premium or becoming more monopolistic(monopoly vs monopoly) it can have negative impact. “General ideas are a limitation of human intellect” - words of Alexis De Toquivelle, observer of birth of modern democracy.
Competition doesn't exist as you think it does. It's mostly an illusion to fuck you over harder. All the big players are teamed up and are just pretending they're enemies.
that looker room basketball part was vibe
The only con of DLSS 3 and FSR3 is that they work so damn well that in a couple of years the performance of all AAA games will depend completely on this technology. If the big studios already optimize their tgames little to nothing... imagine if they simply put this in it and the game already go minimally well
not a couple years
(points to remenant II claiming its been made with upscaling in mind).
it really shouldn't be compulsory to make a poorly optimised game to run. It should be a benefit for anyone on a old gpu whos struggling to run their games at playable framerates - especially with how expensive graphics cards are these days
i think this is what all developer actually want? 😂 makes the games but leave the optimization to FSR
@@UltimateChocoWy1 This is sadly happening already, with Remnant 2 being the case. Remnant 2 is a great game just poorly optimized. We want games to run better in native without the use of Upscalers, regardless of who you side with AMD or Nvidia. Better optimization is better in the long run rather than upscaling.
thats actually what i was thinking.
So many games were brought out with poor optimization in the last 2-3 years... hogwarts legacy was one of it e.g.
A really nice game but duo to its frame rate drops, it sometimes was unplayable or at least unenjoyable because it took the entire immersion and not only once here and there.
Many guessed it was due to certain release dates they had to aim for.
well, since you can literally just increase performance now by pressing one button, publishers wont have any pressure anymore releasing a finished product, since the players will more likely accept it, if they can compensate it theirselves...@@MaxRei_Xamier
@@MaxRei_Xamierallen wake 2 also
AMD's slogan really sums it up at this point, "Together we advance". Not a single gamer is left behind, team red, blue or green.
but the moment their CPUs became as good or better than Intel's they started gutting us. don't be mistaken, they're not our friends, they're just the underdog in the GPU market and this is the only card they can play.
@@Amfibios You can keep your nearly $2k Nvidia card any day. FANBOY!
@@Meldium okay, if you want to be like that mate you can use your shitty amd card with fsr. All Nvidia RTX cards will be able to use DLSS 3.5
@@Meldium AMD's CPUs and motherboards are literally more expensive than Intel's. It seems you're so bent over for AMD that you can't see the truth anymore.
They're absolutely right though. Also before you call me an Nvidia fanboy my system is all AMD and half the gpus I've ever had have been AMD I just don't kid myself into thinking that AMD are the good guy and can do no wrong like crazy fanboys like you do.@@Meldium
FSR 3 might make the 4060 even more power efficient, which is a nice bonus to the 5 people who bought it.
5 people who bought it 😂😂😂
You'd be surprised by how many people are getting gaming laptops with the 4060m lol, kinda coz it's pretty much the best value for money (I know, I know) GPU that isn't very different than the desktop variant, and 4070s are just way too expensive
@@mihirojha4475 so 8 people? Wow that’s kinda a big difference
@@SordidusFellatio yup, a 60% increase is pretty big 😉
*Cries inside*
Every AAA game developer after hearing this:
*throws game optimization book out the window*
At first i thought "oh thats a pretty subtle jab fair enough" and then he went straight for thr jugular
As a Nvidia user I can say: THANK YOU AMD!
I mean adrenaline is stable AF on red cards.. imagine how stable it would be working with nvidia cards🤣 as AMD user my condolences to U 💔
And then there's me... With an AMD CPU and an Nvidia GPU 😅
Edit: How did this comment blow up lmao
@@HT79 same🤣
@@HT79 7800x3d +4090, best of both worlds. :P
same lol @@HT79
They literally did the "Download Ram" but instead of giving you viruses they give you fps 😂😂 well played amd well played
We can download gpu's now💀💀
Wait wait wait... what do you mean by viruses? My task manager is showing 512GB of RAM but my GPU is running 100% all the time to generate it. Is that bad?
@@4Core100 Sounds good to me
Nvidia: you wouldn't download free performance would you ?
i just downloaded more vram
10/10
This was good. I sometimes get a picture in my head from pop culture when I see or hear something and think "damn, this would make a good video". This was just a master class on that I couldn't do.
Man your videos are gold. Keep it up ,
I think wide support was the plan all along. If Nvidia forces its 20/30xx series users to upgrade to 40xx, AMD just cancelled that.
They literally said: don't throw away your old card!
And by that, they significantly cut 40xx series sales. Big W to AMD
They're like we can't out sell you, but we can convince people to stop buying your shit and thus knee cap you to our level of sales 🤣
fsr3 looks shit
Do note, this does not mean FSR3 will not work with other and slower GPUs, it is simply not recommended and optimized. Graphics cards such as GTX 10 and lower will also support FSR3 upscaling, but not the frame generation technology. -AMD
I should have bought AMD anything at this point , not my laptop with rtx 3050 4 freaking GB thinking they're going to be optimising for it.
You are forcing AMD users to not buy 7000 cards too lmao
just imagine fsr3 on them handheld consoles, what a treat
Yep, that will be game changer and imagine how big it is for Xbox Series S too.. right now it's mental how you can run all of that games for 250 bucks, but with fsr3 it will be even more bizzare..... Everyone can play everything, we are living the gaming dreams and our children will be able to experience every masterpiece of a game even if we don't have big salary
Yup steam deck users rejoice!
It already happen with fsr2 on switch
FSR3 will definitely be supported on the Steam Deck. Also if AMD is able to enable frame generation for all DX11 and DX12 games, it is likely possible for the open-source community to bring that to every game running via Vulkan - which means on Linux pretty much every game out there, since you can run any DirectX game or even OpenGL game through Vulkan layers on close to native performance. Should be pretty epic... so if FSR3 is good, I would expect Valve to implement it as a toggle into their SteamOS UI on the Deck.
So fsr works on 2021 cpu 5600g?
I'm sooooo happy with my 6650xt already, this just made me so unbelievably happy I chose AMD!!
Same dude i have rx 6500 xt but even i am happy 💀
AMD just announced 5700X3D, brand new CPU for 2016's AM4 in 2024, that's how you win customers.
This is why competition between brands is great AMD's way to get more people on their side against Nvidia to perceive the brand more positively and buy more of their products
Exactly and I am glad that amd is always the one who is breaking the rules to achieve the best to get more consumers and offer alot more than just plain stuff that other "Premium brands" are offering..
Because it allows AMD to lie about a performance increase that doesn't exist? You can do this already by lowering the resolution.
@@Wylie288lol. Bruh. It is lower resolution and then upscale. The best part is upscale. That mean lower you resolution but doesn't change the visuals too much.
people will just buy rtx and get both,how does this help amd,i take amd because i pretty much like everything about it the name,the design of the card the software the red/black aura i can sacrifice power for it and i never buy the most expensive thing,but people would get nvidia since it's the most powerfull gpu anyway,how does this help amd??
@@ogaimon3380 because people are able to wait longer to buy a GPU which means lower sales numbers.
Steam survey already shows that barely anyone uses AMD GPUs.
Buying 6700xt and support AMD is the best decision I made.
Same here!
Buying Nvidia RTX 4090 and supporting AMD is the best decision I made. Thanks to AMD we can all benefit from there generosity.
@@dtrjones Hey, if you can afford to fork out that much for a card - go for it, honestly! It's an amazing card. It's just that... yeah. 2000+ dollars is a bit steep (not even gonna count the need for a top-of-the-line CPU, monitor, PSU etc. to run that beast to its full potential). I was interested in the 4070, but goddamn... 600+ is ridiculous.
I bought a 6750xt and they even gave me Starfield with it lol
@@X_irtzwhat 2000 dollars are you talking about? In my country its 1400 dollars
Amd understands the most important form of advertising is getting people to like and trust the company, It’s working.
NVIDIA: You know how much i sacrificed!?
Me: Not much. :I
It's so beautiful when AMD makes life better for (all) gamers and to know Nvidia doesn't like it is telling.
czcams.com/video/sGKCrcNsVzo/video.html - Ray Reconstruction works on all GeForce RTX GPUs
AMD would do the exact same thing if they were in the same position of nvidia. Nvidia doesn't give a fuck about this because they know they're going to sell more cards at a higher price this year.
I mean amd has been secureing exclusive deals with games to cut dlss out for little reason other then to have their program be the defacto software
imagine gloryfing one company while trashing the other while they are the same
@@mateuszkrytyk5711 I hard disagree.... Have used both and currently using NVIDIA, I always felt more cared for while using AMD products, and I find them to be way more compassionate.
And so history repeats itself. Thanks to AMD, these technologies become available to everyone.
Remember the GSync and Freesync situation some years back. Without AMD we might have never gotten cheap and universaly available Adaptive Sync Displays.
I'm so happy that AMD is back as a competitor of NVidea these days.
Yep
Except that displays with a G-Sync module are still the superior option for the widest color gamut and framerate target (goes lower and higher). Same thing with DLSS - higher quality, done very fast. Same thing with motion interpolation (frame gen)...
Freesync is trash though. Has way more issues than Gsync. Gsync is basically plug and play while FreeSync is definitely not plug and play.
@@xuimodDont care, having options is better than not. Still wont be buying an nvidia card. Even if AMD are shit atleast I can afford their stuff. Its better than nothing at all. The only way I will buy Nvidias stuff is if they compete at AMD's level. If they refuse then I guess il just have to buy an AMD card as a last resort.
@@gavinferguson2938 Except you should care? People like you praise AMD for making an open but subpar offering and then never make any noise about it not improving over the years. FSR 3 is finally them admitting that FSR was crap compared to DLSS, and it still probably hasn't caught up. Freesync is also subpar to G-Sync and AMD has done nothing to push the standard forward.
Me when I'm still using a 60 hertz monitor
YIPPEE
I’m from the future. FSR3 and AFMF really works.
Looks like AMD became the hero we needed
Let's not hope it becomes vader
The K6 microprocessor was launched by AMD in 1997. The main advantage of this particular microprocessor is that it was designed to fit into existing desktop designs for Pentium-branded CPUs. It was marketed as a product that could perform as well as its Intel Pentium II equivalent but at a significantly lower price. The K6 had a considerable impact on the PC market and presented Intel with serious competition.
no company is saint lol
Its the hero like Petyr Baelish where you at the end realize how much you got played and that AMD is actually worse than Nvidia ever could be.
tldr you forgot Intel GPUs existed because fanboy
Frame generation for older GPUs not just the latest ones, and their latest GPUs can basically do frame generation in every single game. Genius move from AMD
frame Generation sucks on older gpus because they wont Produce enough fps... it feels laggy as hell.. dlss 3.5 will destroy amd anyway again, amd is Anyway irrelevant for the highend Marked
@@adidkjfis dlss 3.5 even available in 1000 series
@@Shahzad12357No, DLSS 3.5 is only for RTX cards.
@@adidkjf How can DLSS 3.5 destroy amd when it will only run on newest generation while FSR runs on nvidia. DLSS does have better quality image but realistically you cant see any of that shit while playing.
@@adidkjfyou sound like a Nvdia fanboy...
amazing bro keep making these videos
1:18 my gtx 980 ti. I actually am surprised how well it does with FSR the few triple A title games I used it on in 4k res.
Normally DLSS3 should work for the RTX 3000 series as well. But nVidia decided not to. Well, thanks AMD.
le DLSS 3.5 n'est pas la continuité du DLSS 3.0 ils ont fait exprès pour que les gens soient contents, mais la frame generation est uniquement disponible sur les RTX 4000 donc automatiquement le FSR 3.0 de chez AMD sera sans doute bien meilleur que le DLSS 3.0 de chez nvidia@@qui3573
DLSS sucks anyway and i always turn it off
I find it depends on the game. It helps in some games, but in other games it makes it look terrible/doesn't really improve much
@@bulbazoth6473
@@bulbazoth6473 It doesn't suck.. It does help but if you have a 40 series card you will rely in DLSS 3 because without DLSS 3 enabled on a 40 series it will be worse than 20 series cards lmao
@@qui3573 ah bah j’espère bien la 3070 que j’ai a jamais vraiment été avantagée par quoi que ce soit depuis que je l’ai (1an et demi)
This actually might make me buy AMD next time. Good job, AMD
how come if all they did is to make nvidia a better investment? or am I missing smt?
@@plagx3428 People take sides, and if I'm going to take the side of someone, it will be people that don't stall innovation by stupid limitations
@@ahypernova how does dlss work tho? Is it a driver or it requires a certain chip in gpu to get an actual performance out of it?
@@plagx3428 The whole thing only works on nVidia and they have limited version 3 to only 4000 series. I have a 3080 and I can't use dlss 3.
@@plagx3428 its an ai powered image enhancing technology that's exclusive only to Nvidia's RTX graphics cards (RTX 2000s and up), while AMD is pushing out the same thing but making it available to all GPU brand models and way older GPUs.
Amd is amazing. It grabs whats created already, adapts it and makes it way better.
Arms race! Let's gooooo!
This is the exact move I was hoping from AMD. They've been silently going at it, releasing great opensource projects, for decades now. As a tiny example, Vulkan was basically started by AMD, when Mantle (what it was called) become good and gained traction they gave it to Khronos to develop further, that is the Vulkan we know and love now. Nvidia has always been loud and obnoxious, everyone that was not tech literate fell for it immediately. Yes their tech is good, but their business practices are not. They are anti consumer. It's about time AMD starts being chaotic good instead of just good. I'm here for it!
As if AMD would not be a company 😂 They are just want to get a bigger portion of the cake, which nvidia currently holds , these are great ads and PR for AMD
@@bence2345 Right, but it's correct that AMD have always innovated for the benefit of the consumer. Intel had their greedy tick-tock development model that squeezed maximal profit for minimal progress for years until AMD (Having invested heavily in their heterogenous architecture and APU's) forced them to show their hand with Ryzen. And before that they propelled PC gaming forward with the Athlon x64 chips, making multicore processors accessible for the casual markets.
Vulkan did not start by AMD. Vulkan have it's original base from OpenGL Next. they just add AMD mantle stuff to it. but even without mantle OpenGL already allowing architecture specific optimization to be done.
"It's about time AMD starts being chaotic good instead of just good."
good? in one aspect sometime they actually worse than nvidia. they try to claim competitor try to hurt them but in reality they also did the same thing. just that when they are the one that got hit they complain a lot. what AMD try to do with Mantle before also anti consumer. but AMD have always been seen as the underdog and back then they get a lot of pass. that's why AMD end up cancelling Mantle 2.0 because game developer understand the real AMD intention with Mantle.
I knew mantle but thought it died to vulkan, seems it actually gave birth to it.
@@bence2345 Of course they want money, they are a company. But their strategy is making a better product for everyone, not just selling the bleeding edge for eye watering money to the elite only. Not all companies' ethics are equal, you know.
This is actually legendary. As a Nvidia/AMD user, I respect the hell out of AMD for this.
When i can talk to the ai and its trying to groom my kids to be trans
@@censored4christ162 what
@@censored4christ162 ????
@@censored4christ162 Ok
Same
that basketball part was a gem
this is one of the reasons i love AMD, they really made FSR 3 which is like one of the biggest "vs nvidia" arguments yet AMD made it open for everyone because its software and not hardware
I’m not sure if the release will match the hype here. But I’m glad that AMD wants to make it open source for everyone
Let's see, but FSR so far has been decent.
People getting overly hyped didn't see the requirements for using FSR3 without major issues like lag and ghosting.
@@DelgaDude all im hoping for is using it in cyberpunk and hopefully starfield.
Well people hype any shit nvidia put out, why not hype amd tech too?
I am sure it won't. FSR is always much worse than RTX features. Nvidia keeps asking for shitloads of money because their tech is much better. I appreciate the sentiment from AMD but they have been overhyping their products for 15 years at least and Ryzen was the only time they a actually delivered. Also RX480
Thanks AMD, for pushing Nvidia to do something crazy, too
Thanks AMD to let us not to spend money on graphic cards
...something crazy? u mean their prices to the roof?
Nvidia, OK lets release RTX 5xxx series sooner, to eliminate competition for good.
@@pekonipilvi116
It means Nvidia will be forced to respond with something crazy lest they want to lose EVERYONE in team green to AMD
@@greenavocado7074 they won't, their best nodes are for AI cards ;)
Well, as from NVIDIA user all my life, this short video was entertaining, good job swaying me.
Bro brought a bazooka in a fist fight .
This is a huge W for AMD and gamers around the world deserve a company like this . Nvidia got too comfortable being at the top and only making new cards barely better than the previous ones. I think my next card will be AMD regardless of the specs.
I made that switch 2 gens back. Never looked back and never missed nvidia or intel cpus for that matter
Most people only looking for the fastest card.. That its 9/10 always Nvidia. I buy only a card that suits my needs.. I know the RX7900XT isnt maybe great value. But want to have more progress over an RX 6700XT.. and a RX 7900XT is currently only what i need to run Raytracing with a great 1440P monitor.. And always can switch up a notch to 4K gaming without Raytracing. Its enough for the next 5 a 6 years.
People tend to forget that there are also many creators and developers who absolutely needs CUDA and have no choice...
@@rallyscoot7900XT became great Value when AMD chopped the price down to 699$.. outpreforms the 4070Ti by a 7-12% on average and it has enough Vram to last a long time. 20GB is a gigantic memory pool compared to 12GB on 4070Ti.
@rallyscoot well it is great value especially considering that it beats the 1200$ 4080
3 months later: "NVIDIA destroys AMD with 15% better performance". 1 year later: "AMD chrushed Nvidia AGAIN!". An eternal circle.
I love competition
Competition is good.
@@potatobang7713 30% higher cost 😂
nice username, are you a founder of winamp?
Competition means win for the customer
for this content you earn a subscriber hahahaha cheers from the philippines
Damnnnnn. Yo boy still rocking a RX580 4GB 😭💪
IMPORTANT! FSR 3 does work on any Gpu but FSR 3 is not fluid motion frames aka their version of frame generation. Fluid motion frames only works with 2000 series and above for Nvidia and 5700 and above for AMD.
Regardless, it is amazing that FSR 3 works on all gpus and fluid motion frames works on lots of Gpus. Just wanted to clear a misconception.
it actually can run in older gpus, like gtx and rx 500s, but it's not 100% confirmed about performance like rtx 20s and rx 5700+
It CAN run on older GPUs (RX 500 Series, GTX 10xx series...), but AMD strongly recommend RX 5700 & above or RTX 2000 series & above to be able to generate frames effectively.
They said this with original FSR …pro tip guys get a monitor with its own image sharpening tech inside…. You’ll see balanced FSR 40% more frames… no loss of visual quality whatsoever.
So it'll work with a 3070, thanks for the info.
@@jimcacheroNot the same. It induces a lot of latency with screens techs
Imagine the performance boost on handheld PCs and the Steamdeck 😱
Can’t even imagine lmao must’ve helped so much
People who play handheld and steamdeck are like vegans looking for a soy burger that tastes like meat
@@milosv123344or maybe we travel a lot and don’t wanna carry two laptops. Or maybe we like Moonlighting from our PC on the couch.
@@slickvibez16 exactly. and tbh, I don't own a steam deck or any handheld pc. but I do already have been through 3 gaming laptops and have been a solid nintendo HANDHELD gamer since 4th grade. I've had a PC (not a gaming one) at home and having the mobility is just pure convenience for my use case. I understand the difference in power between the form factors and I never found myself wanting more. it's just that the mobile nature or my lifestyle is better suited for having devices on the go.
Case in point: I've been eyeing the GPD Win Max for quite some time now just to lighten the load on my backpack.
@@Unlucky1776 I mean I'm basically having high expectations here and i'm 100% overhyping . There's probably a catch like reduced battery. it's just that seeing them frames and fidelity on a portable just brings a tear to my eye
Now definitely I won't be moving from my 3060Ti FE to 40xx series.
Meanwhile NVIDIA: Ray Reconstruction.
Also NVIDIA: Enjoy it with all RTX cards.
damn backward compatability is insane!!!! In today's world. AMD did something great!🔥🔥
And supposedly on consoles as well. Sheeeed dude.
Can't wait for testing this on rx 6400!
Do note, this does not mean FSR3 will not work with other and slower GPUs, it is simply not recommended and optimized. Graphics cards such as GTX 10 and lower will also support FSR3 upscaling, but not the frame generation technology. -AMD
@@nicekeyboardalan6972 ohhhh
i own a gtx 1050ti@@nicekeyboardalan6972
as an amd cpu and Nvidia gpu guy this brought tears to my eyes
Me waiting for the thumbnail to play, 🎉🎉 soooo worth it at 1:18 absolutely 😂😂😂😂
Holy shit. I will now definitely be considering AMD the next time I upgrade my PC. What a bunch of legends.
your decision means their strat worked.
I'm also buying one so they got me too.
ME too
Same
I would have switched to AMD long ago if I didn't have to do things other than gaming with my PC. I hope they step it up in other areas too.
@@Relseg and what are you doing besides gaming that AMD card can't do?
Just for this consumer friendly vision, my next card will be AMD. This is how you win people over: good practices and care for not just your customers, but the market as a whole.
they run just as fast, if not faster than nvidia cards anyway. I swapped out a GTX1660S for an RX6600 and saw small bumps in performance, and even some raytracing abilities while staying above 50fps on a card that cost $100 less at the time. I prob wont ever go back to nvidia. Just throwing money away to fanboy...
they also have great support for Linux, while nvidia is nearly unusable on linux
Yeah agree, Nvidia just took a lead with their new DLSS but this isn't an argument anymore :D however, I think they're still ahead in the streaming territory in terms of visual quality.
I'm also going AMD seems they also require less energy to run the same frames as their Nvidia equivalent so in the long term that saves money too. Energy is Hella expensive here.
y and deal with the shitty software they have.... got ride of my 5700xt and i will not return untill they are able to do one decent software.... it was a nightmare.....
NVIDIA is for AI, AMD is for Humans
since its nowhere near dlss3 and requires 70+ fps to even actually do something useful its more like joke right now
This is amazing PR. Even if FSR doesn't match the fidelity of DLSS, that's a moot point if most people can't even use the newest DLSS anyways. Hope FSR 3 is made available in as many games as possible. Hardware like the steam deck will benefit immensely from FSR 3
My steam deck was my first thought, this sounds huge
100% on this. I think AMD & Steam really are going to be spearheading linux over the next 5-10 years
It's not just PR, it's a good strategy, if they didn't open FSR 3 to all GPU, dev would have the choice bewteen FSR and DLSS, the wouldn't want to implement the two of them and since there is more nvidia gpu than AMD would have gone with DLSS since it cover more user. But with an open FSR it cover all user so it became the defacto choice and allow AMD card to be competitive with Nvidia
Yeah, FSR 3 with frame generation can run on anything as old as 20 series Nvidia cards or 500 series AMD cards, and without 10 series and 5000 series respectively, but the way I read it there is a good chance to go even one or two generations older and still get it to work with a benefit.
Though I wouldnt recommend frame generation with anything under 60 native FPS just to avoid input lag issues, and neither does AMD, so maybe dont go too crazy with that old 750Ti. Frame generation is really just there to get some extra smoothness for high refresh rate monitors, not really as a crutch for gaming performance.
But this is still miles ahead of giving the best crutch to the most modern GPUs that realistically shouldnt even need it (but actually do because lower end cards are performing on the same level as their respective 30 series cards and their only improvement is better DLSS support)
Oh my god, for Steam Deck I cannot wait!!
FSR 3 is supposedly also going to be available for current generation consoles, if this is true it will generate a great expansion in the possibilities of future games, making possible the creation of very ambitious projects (usually new games are made with the idea of being able to run on current generation consoles).
this will also make devs more lazy, like the recent fiasco with recommended specs including DLSS performance mode. Trust me you dont want this to happen. The gaming industry is already a disaster as it is, running not really graphically intensive games at ridiculously low framerates because they never bothered to optimise the game to run better. Im just getting this off the top of my head for Baldurs Gate 3 recently. The game with its graphics had no right to require those specs. The game is poorly optimised so they just throw in a faster GPU? That is not how you do it, the game looks far worse than what we got years and years ago and yet they ask for a GPU that wasnt even out yet when we had those graphics.
@@Glade4 I'm pretty sure the BG3 system requirements aren't even that crazy, what are you on about?
@nicholas_btw Talking about how lazy developers got with Remnant 2. Amazing game, shit optimization and performance. Developer said it was made with "DLSS and upscaling in mind". It looks good but not Cyberpunk good, they cut a few corners in that regard, it barely runs like it's supposed to on high end 4080 and 4090 GPUs.
@@nicholas_btwyou can run it on a GTX 710 (single fps @ 720p and lower double digits with fsr) but that's actually impressive for a card that barely handles CZcams, lol.
@@kevinsj99 Well of course it doesn't look as good as Cyberpunk, that game has path tracing. We can't be asking for "next-gen" games and then complain when 5 year old graphics cards can't run them at max settings. Whether we like it or not, AI upscaling and frame gen and all those other things are basically required if we want games to look better and better.
So in other words, my 970 could potentially come out of retirement.
"My 10 year old gpu" reaction deserve oscar 😃
Amd has been so innovative over the years and it shows.
facts man, their gpus, cpus, software etc. they are going crazy!
Thats why they always copy what Nvidia is doing in terms of graphic technology lol Don't get me wrong, I hate Nvidia with their greedy little rat fingers, but calling AMD graphics department, innovative? nah lol Their CPU department tho. Thats innovative
how is it innovative?
You are joking right :D
@@briankim6148how are they copying NVIDIA. Give a example or evidence.
My first cpu was and, and my first gpu gonna be and. Because I love what they are doing for gaming community. Respect
Why does my frame drop when I turn on the AMD fluid motion frames? And when I turn it off, my frames scky rocketed? I was playing Sons of the forest and I have RX6700XT
every DX11/DX12 game? holy shit AMD going hard
Did amd always have balls of pure chadium or is it just me.
since they started spelling rising wrong
AMD always pushes the open standards.
This isn't really anything new. But because AMD pushes open standards, their implementations can be a bit behind Nvidia in terms of quality. Then people compare them and declare Nvidia to be better. Then the Nvidia good, AMD bad circle jerking starts again and we are back at square one with a self imposed Nvidia vendor lock and people being angry about that. Its a constant self defeating process.
AMD really just needs to win for once and actually match Nvidia in quality, but have their stuff work on everything. Lets hope FSR3 actually does that. 🙂
@@DanielWW2 They're not behind due to the open standards, on the contrary. A lot of their software only is usable because it's open and they get contributions for free. AMD is behind in software because they're a much smaller company and they invest much less into software development.
AMD always had chadium balls but they became larger and larger lately lol
Destroy !! 😂😂
Too much excitement bro lol
Its too early to tell .. but i wish at least it can compete with dlss
Omfg I love this video.
Started PC gaming about 2yrs ago. Bought AMD just cause everyone was telling me to get green. I’m just built different. Best decision ever made in gaming. #teamred
My respect grows more and more for AMD
Not to put a shame
But the Legends Love was Always on them ))!)
What a company!!
AMD was always cool-- I still remember when Bulldozer got shat on by everyone in the industry but AMD just kept on chuggin, and TekSyndicate defended that POS generation and we got one of the funniest YTP videos on the tech industry out of it?
Nvidia does no longer care about gaming. Much more money in AI.
Like they always try to reinvent the wheel that somehow ends up being a rectangle.
@@truantrayWhich AMD will overtake them in that department in 3 years as well.
instead of downgrading drivers to demolish the old cards, they added new features to support the recent cards and giving the old cards a new hope
things we love to see ❤️ AMD
Nobody has ever intentionally harmed performance of older cards. Not sure what you're getting at? In fact, AMD has historically had horrendous drivers for their newer cards at launch.
@@dhkatz_I'd advise you do your research properly. Nvidia was caught, and fined, as a result of limiting performance in later drivers during the GTX 700 - GTX 900 series GPUs (2012-2015). This was the same time Apple was subsequently fined for doing the same on iOS updates for older Gen phones to falsify performance differences between newer and older hardware.
poopoo@@dhkatz_
@@dhkatz_nice try shlomo
Gods forbid they improve their products @@dhkatz_ also what @thatzaliasguy said.
Amd making nvidia users happy more than nvidia itself does
Bro it works even on integrated graphics just holy shit
We gamers don't need anybody to destroy anything, we need dynamic competition at nice prices.
thats what they do, AMD literally saved us from an Intel monopoly of CPUs, they have a lot of work to do to match the benefits of nvidia gpu's(cause performance its mostly the same), because nvidia has been dominating the market for so long that even the games themselves are better optimized for these cards, apart from all the facilities with Geforce Experience, dlss and so on, the FS3 is a very good step, my processor is Ryzen, however my graphics card is still Nvidia, but they won't be able to inflate prices for much longer if AMD continues to offer such good product improvements
They just opened up the market for any card that supports DX11. I've got a decade-old 8gb R390 in the e-waste pile that just became a viable card again, think I'll build a little boneyard PC for my nephew :)
You need to support those that do right by you. And stop supporting those that don't.
That's what gamers need to do.
And we all know what the right thing to do is here.
@@donmauricio2845 Pshh... Nvidia still held back on VRAM on the RTX 3000 series. Imagine knowing my "used to be" 3060Ti competitor card, the 6700XT 12GB, now beating the 3070 and in some case the 3070 Tii in practically any new AAA game released in 2023 and some from 2022 because why? Because they only stuck 8GB VRAM in that. My dang RX480 8GB from 2016 had 8GB VRAM. Do you know how much more the plain 3070 8GB cost over the 6700XT back then? It was like $200+ more. And the only thing it really beat it in was "RTX" DX Ray Tracing. Rasterization? The 6000 series is the top dog. Games without "RTX" or any ray tracing? The 6000 series blew away the dollar for dollar Nvidia equivalent.
Stop buying Nvidia. Stop buying from a company that gives you something special that only your generation of card can run... until 8 months later when they release the next gen and you can't use it. Imagine being an RTX 2000 series owner. DLSS frame generation? What's that? Oh, only for 4000 series guys.
AMD has ALWAYS made EVERYTHING Open Source. And honestly, they shouldn't. They should give Nvidia a taste of their own medicine. Imagine if anything from the 1660Ti and back couldn't use FSR 1 or 2.x. Only every single AMD card.
But AMD actually cares about gamers. They get NOTHING out of someone on a 1060 6GB being able to use FSR because that 1060 guy is gonna buy Nvidia on his next go around.
Nvidia? They throw PhysX and Hairworks and not just DXR (DirectX Ray Tracing) but "RTX" DXR into everything they can so that it will perform terribly on AMD cards. They've been doing this since 2005 or so with PhysX. Then Hairworks. And there's always some proprietary "Nvidia paywall" bull crap that Nvidia throws out there to hurt AMD users.
And AMD STILL says "We don't care, we're gamers. You got a 1080 Ti? You got a 980 Ti? You have a 1050Ti? A 1060 3GB? Here... use our FSR 2.1. Play that game you couldn't play before."
Why would you NOT support that company? What do you think happens when more and more people support a company like that?
Their R&D gets more money put into it, they expand, they grow and they make killer cards that outperform Nvidia. Not that they don't do that anyways dollar for dollar. Plus, AMD is always faster 6 months down the road. Fine wine technology. Like I said, I used to battle with the 3060 Ti. Now? That's a 6600XT competitor and I trade blows with the 3070.
And in the newest games (games that use more than 8GB VRAM), I smoke the 3070Ti because they crash or don't load textures lol. Or they drop 30% performance as soon as they use up their VRAM.
Stop supporting an anti-consumer company. Stop it.
Oh, and look at games that don't use "RTX" DXR... like UE5 games. The 6900/6950XT blows away the 3080Ti with Lumen and Nanite enabled. Or is it the 3090 that it blows away?
AMD has ALWAYS been the better bang for the buck at launch, then they improve over time with driver updates... and now UE5 is becoming a thing and Nvidia can't bribe them to use RTX DXR. They already have Lumen. And AMD does better with Lumen ray tracing than Nvidia.
I was an nvidia fan for over 20 years. Soon my new gpu will be an AMD RX 7900 XTX. I'm sick of nvidia at this point. Overpriced products for minimal performance gains from previous models, and locking DLSS 3 at most expensive cards only, while AMD giving a lot more performance for a lot better prices, and most important, makes FSR 3 available across every gpus. Well done Team Red.
DLSS 3 as well as 3.5 works on all Nvidia GPUs. Only Frame Generation part of it works on expensive cards. Get your facts right before slating something.
they did very dirty sh*t with the frame generation only on 4xxx series. and the dlss is trash in most games on 1080p.
AMD latency reduction for FSR3 is locked to 7000 series. You can enable fake frames generation but with horrible latency on all the other cards.
@@korhanaydemir8366 Yeah, but AMD also stated the competitors can use their own built in latency reduction software if they decide to use AMD Frame Gen, so Nvidia can use their Reflex for example, and Reflex seem to be the better deal still vs. Anti Lag+
Rdna3 performance gains are minimal as well. I don't see why the rtx 4000 series gpus are being bashed for this (other than price) and not the rx 7000 gpus too.
"For any card" felt like "Eac-EACH!" from breaking bad first cook
Six months have passed. Destroyed?
With fsr 3.1
completely
this shows how nvidia was fooling us by giving dlss 3 only to the newer gpu's
No, dlss just leverage more of the architecture and core structure changes nvidia has made. They are completely different technologies with a similar function.
@@MaksKuakaagreed, Nvidias uses optical flow vector and a much tighter intregation with games to generate new frame while AMD uses a kind of motion vector which needs asynchronous to run
well duh... when dlss was a rumor i was thinking cool old graphics cards wont be obsulete then when they said that software could only be run on new hardware, it was obvious what they are doing.
That was clear right from the start just by looking at how the technology works. Also a modder ran DLFG on a 2070 like one week after the release.
@@kofeaddictmotion vectors can be pulled and calculated via matrix ops, tensor cores do it great. Hell the ps5 can do it fkr async. Masters in computer science ftw dont listen to nvidia 😂😂
Never stop making these videos 😁
hands down the best computer meme ever
and fsr 3 is coming to all rtx series 💀
AMD is pro gamers. NVIDIA is like Apple: we have to get money
Even apple is better since their product (iPhone) is actually value for money
I am not exaggerating it's just that they really put efforts in the inside of the device therefore turning it into a beast phone.
BTW I don't know whether their other products are value for money or not.
@@shreyanshpandey8421Apple is garbage you have apple brain
Also one more thing iPhone is not evenly priced in every country...
The crazy thing about this is that its going to be open source, which means that it can be implemented to work with proton or one of its forks, which will allow it to work on the steam deck
that's hecking awesome!!
@@striker7729why is it so?
@@niokla3867wat
@@niokla3867you'll literally run FSR3 on a *mobile device*
because it's gonna work on steam deck idk@@niokla3867
This aged like milk
Why?
cause the FSR is not as good as they made it seem like and some games Anit-cheat systems think that AMD's Anti Lag feature is like a cheat it's just not as efficient as NVIDIA's DLSS
@@Memtexwe're talking about AMD fluid motion frames not anti-lag lmfao, and that's long been fixed. Nvidia fanboys are clueless when it comes to tech
@@Dmoney462 Nvidia now has RTX Remix tools, RTX HDR, Frame Gen, RTX Video Enhancement and a bunch of more new features rolling out on every update, AMD is behind on that technology as AMD is a basic hardware for basic people while NVIDIA is more for professionals and advanced users who can take advantage of the technology and create and improve on ideas, so yeah AMD is not comparable to NVIDIA atm.
@@Memtex for new graphics cards only, You wanna buy a new GPU every generation? Go for it, not my money. Or you can rely on amd and fsr to keep your old card running. You don't even know the difference between anti-lag and AFMF, that in itself tells me you've never used AMD so your opinion isn't too valid. 👋
That is actually a bit of a reason to go with AMD now, in my opinion. Nvidia gives most of the time only their newest stuff the new features, while AMD also gives it to older ones. Means you could be able to use new features in the future with AMD cards, while you would need a new one for Nvidia
I never used AMD products before, but the fact that the best 3 game consoles out there are using their GPU is awesome
Yeah
AMD was working on RISC chipsets before it was cool and paved the way for modern ARM processors. The only reason AMD wasn't more popular early on is because intel cheated (and got sued and had to pay AMD for) abusing their distributers to push intel and drag their feet on AMD marketing and sales. They always had better memory addressing and better overclocking. The problem with AMD is they spend billions on research and, like IBM, they sit on it to play the market to optimize current tech instead of implementing the new stuff.
"Best" and "consoles" in the same sentence - sounds weird.
@@winesk123 Yeah I mean there are only 3 current gen consoles (Steam Deck isn't a console imo)
Their design is just superior. Affordable, efficient and just more of a engineering masterpiece!