I think you have an excellent insight into fairness. Our sense of fairness is usually personal and limited in scope as compared to the perspectives of nature and the universe.
Our laws are extracted from the law of nature (oneness)... The story of Job gives an indication of your "fairness".... Because it is not on us to decide how "nature" should respond to our questions.. We simply have to accept the laws of nature, what ever they are... And by seeing more "truth" you will also see more suffering... It is up to you, how much you can handle....
4:15 🖐I disagree, the concept of fairnes existed long before man appeared on earth and is called balance. Nature is all about balance, the problem is that we don't see nature as balanced, because this would mean accepting certain natural laws we humans find 'unfair.' One such natural law is: Natural Balance is > Society's Acceptance The concept of balance is indeed fundamental in both nature & human societies. 🕵♂Let's explore this further. *Nature's Balance* : - In the natural world, balance is pervasive. Ecosystems thrive when there's equilibrium among various components-predators & prey, plant life & herbivores, climate cycles, and nutrient cycles. - Nature operates based on intricate feedback loops that maintain stability. For instance, predator populations keep herbivore populations in check, which in turn affects plant growth. - The laws of physics, such as the conservation of energy and matter, also contribute to maintaining balance. *Human Perception of Balance* : - We humans often perceive nature as "unfair." This perception arises because we tend to view balance through our own lens of preferences, desires, and societal norms. - What seems "unfair" to us might be a natural consequence of underlying principles. For example, the survival of the fittest-a fundamental concept in evolution-can appear harsh, but it ensures adaptation and progress. - Our societal constructs, including laws, ethics, and cultural norms, shape our perception of fairness. Sometimes, these constructs conflict with natural balance. *Natural Balance vs. Society's Acceptance* : - My statement that "Natural Balance is > Society's Acceptance" highlights an intriguing tension. - Natural balance operates independently of human opinions or judgments. It follows universal laws. - Society's acceptance, on the other hand, varies across cultures, historical periods, and individual perspectives. What one society deems fair may differ from another's view. - When societal norms clash with natural balance (e.g., environmental degradation due to human activities), tensions arise. 👉In summary, the interplay between natural balance and societal acceptance is complex. Recognizing this complexity allows us to appreciate the delicate equilibrium in nature while acknowledging our role in shaping our world.
I think life is cyclical (seasonal) so if you miss out now you can catch it again later when it comes around. But if you stop believing in it’s cyclical nature then you miss out. You opt out by your own choice. The unfairness is you opting out. If you want fairness you have to justify yourself. By putting yourself back in the way of the good. Place yourself in the center of the flow of life / engage fully in each season as it comes. Laws are a false constancy. They kill the flow of life. In order end the seasons and stop the cycle (like storing food in silos because we want even distribution) The most stable place is in the middle of the flow. Like a boat on the ocean catching the breeze in its’ sails.
I think we need to teach people to make their life fair by showing them how to sail. Not create blanket rules to evenly distribute resources. Teach them to create their own and share with others their methods and fruits of their cycles / seasons
😎Man is egocentric, which makes him technical (order) nature (chaos) Man aka *technology* specialises while everything else in nature simply diversifies. The fact that man only chooses what is best for him leads to less and less biodiversity, which eventually means his downfall. 3:38 *THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SCIENCE & RELIGION* *Religion* = the tool that makes modern society possible = the tie that binds several families together to form *a tribe* *Philosophy* = religion 2.0 = the tie that binds several tribes together to form *a state* *Politics* = religion 3.0 = the tie that binds several states together to form *a nation* [Edit] *Supranational* *Politicts* = religion 4.0 = the tie that binds serveral nations together to form a multi-national organization where negotiated power is delegated to an authority by governments of member states. The concept of supranational union is sometimes used to describe the European Union, as a new type of political entity. My point is that religion is the 1st stage in abstract thinking to ensure the survival of mankind by going beyond the individual's ego. *The social intelligence hypothesis states that social intelligence, that is, complex socialization such as politics, romance, family relationships, quarrels, collaboration, reciprocity, and altruism, (1) was a driving force in developing the size of human brains and (2) today provides our ability to use those large brains in complex social circumstances. This hypothesis claims that the demands of living together is what drives our need for intelligence, and that social intelligence is an evolutionary adaptation for dealing with highly complex social situations, as well as gaining and maintaining power in social groups. Archaeologist Steve Mithen believes that there are two key evolutionary periods of human brain growth that contextualize the social intelligence hypothesis. The first was about two million years ago, when the brain more than doubled in size. Mithen believes that this growth was because people were living in larger, more complex groups, and had to keep track of more people and relationships. These changes required a greater mental capacity and, in turn, a larger brain size. The second key growth period in human brain size occurred between 600,000 and 200,000 years ago, when the brain reached its modern size. While this growth is still not fully explained, Mithen believes that it is related to the evolution of language. Language may be the most complex cognitive task we undertake. Language is directly related to social intelligence because it is primarily used to mediate social relationships. Social intelligence was a critical factor in brain growth. Social and cognitive complexity co-evolve. * Source: Wikipedia 4:13 🤔Why fix something that isn't broken? Fairness is viewing reality through the lens of humanity (= to prioritize mankind over everything else) 6:28 🤨Does it? Because of our technology we act more as a cancer or a virus than the mammal we are, we keep growing in places we shouldn't and if we aren't carefull there will be more humans than the Earth can sustain.
The past is past, but we can only move forward. Hope drives us into tomorrow. And today is a gift, that is why they call it a present. 🎁
Kuro a nice talk!!!
I think you have an excellent insight into fairness. Our sense of fairness is usually personal and limited in scope as compared to the perspectives of nature and the universe.
Of course there is such thing as fairness. It is just like art and beauty. They are only tangible when you let it to manifest.
Our laws are extracted from the law of nature (oneness)... The story of Job gives an indication of your "fairness".... Because it is not on us to decide how "nature" should respond to our questions.. We simply have to accept the laws of nature, what ever they are... And by seeing more "truth" you will also see more suffering... It is up to you, how much you can handle....
4:15
🖐I disagree, the concept of fairnes existed long before man appeared on earth and is called balance.
Nature is all about balance, the problem is that we don't see nature as balanced, because this would mean accepting certain natural laws we humans find 'unfair.'
One such natural law is:
Natural Balance is > Society's Acceptance
The concept of balance is indeed fundamental in both nature & human societies.
🕵♂Let's explore this further.
*Nature's Balance* :
- In the natural world, balance is pervasive. Ecosystems thrive when there's equilibrium among various components-predators & prey, plant life & herbivores, climate cycles, and nutrient cycles.
- Nature operates based on intricate feedback loops that maintain stability. For instance, predator populations keep herbivore populations in check, which in turn affects plant growth.
- The laws of physics, such as the conservation of energy and matter, also contribute to maintaining balance.
*Human Perception of Balance* :
- We humans often perceive nature as "unfair." This perception arises because we tend to view balance through our own lens of preferences, desires, and societal norms.
- What seems "unfair" to us might be a natural consequence of underlying principles. For example, the survival of the fittest-a fundamental concept in evolution-can appear harsh, but it ensures adaptation and progress.
- Our societal constructs, including laws, ethics, and cultural norms, shape our perception of fairness. Sometimes, these constructs conflict with natural balance.
*Natural Balance vs. Society's Acceptance* :
- My statement that "Natural Balance is > Society's Acceptance" highlights an intriguing tension.
- Natural balance operates independently of human opinions or judgments. It follows universal laws.
- Society's acceptance, on the other hand, varies across cultures, historical periods, and individual perspectives. What one society deems fair may differ from another's view.
- When societal norms clash with natural balance (e.g., environmental degradation due to human activities), tensions arise.
👉In summary, the interplay between natural balance and societal acceptance is complex. Recognizing this complexity allows us to appreciate the delicate equilibrium in nature while acknowledging our role in shaping our world.
I think life is cyclical (seasonal) so if you miss out now you can catch it again later when it comes around. But if you stop believing in it’s cyclical nature then you miss out. You opt out by your own choice. The unfairness is you opting out. If you want fairness you have to justify yourself. By putting yourself back in the way of the good. Place yourself in the center of the flow of life / engage fully in each season as it comes.
Laws are a false constancy. They kill the flow of life. In order end the seasons and stop the cycle (like storing food in silos because we want even distribution) The most stable place is in the middle of the flow. Like a boat on the ocean catching the breeze in its’ sails.
I think we need to teach people to make their life fair by showing them how to sail. Not create blanket rules to evenly distribute resources. Teach them to create their own and share with others their methods and fruits of their cycles / seasons
😎Man is egocentric, which makes him technical (order) nature (chaos)
Man aka *technology* specialises while everything else in nature simply diversifies.
The fact that man only chooses what is best for him leads to less and less biodiversity, which eventually means his downfall.
3:38
*THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SCIENCE & RELIGION*
*Religion* = the tool that makes modern society possible = the tie that binds several families together to form *a tribe*
*Philosophy* = religion 2.0 = the tie that binds several tribes together to form *a state*
*Politics* = religion 3.0 = the tie that binds several states together to form *a nation*
[Edit]
*Supranational*
*Politicts* = religion 4.0 = the tie that binds serveral nations together to form a multi-national organization where negotiated power is delegated to an authority by governments of member states. The concept of supranational union is sometimes used to describe the European Union, as a new type of political entity.
My point is that religion is the 1st stage in abstract thinking to ensure the survival of mankind by going beyond the individual's ego.
*The social intelligence hypothesis states that social intelligence, that is, complex socialization such as politics, romance, family relationships, quarrels, collaboration, reciprocity, and altruism,
(1) was a driving force in developing the size of human brains and
(2) today provides our ability to use those large brains in complex social circumstances.
This hypothesis claims that the demands of living together is what drives our need for intelligence, and that social intelligence is an evolutionary adaptation for dealing with highly complex social situations, as well as gaining and maintaining power in social groups.
Archaeologist Steve Mithen believes that there are two key evolutionary periods of human brain growth that contextualize the social intelligence hypothesis. The first was about two million years ago, when the brain more than doubled in size. Mithen believes that this growth was because people were living in larger, more complex groups, and had to keep track of more people and relationships. These changes required a greater mental capacity and, in turn, a larger brain size.
The second key growth period in human brain size occurred between 600,000 and 200,000 years ago, when the brain reached its modern size. While this growth is still not fully explained, Mithen believes that it is related to the evolution of language. Language may be the most complex cognitive task we undertake. Language is directly related to social intelligence because it is primarily used to mediate social relationships.
Social intelligence was a critical factor in brain growth. Social and cognitive complexity co-evolve.
* Source: Wikipedia
4:13
🤔Why fix something that isn't broken?
Fairness is viewing reality through the lens of humanity (= to prioritize mankind over everything else)
6:28
🤨Does it?
Because of our technology we act more as a cancer or a virus than the mammal we are, we keep growing in places we shouldn't and if we aren't carefull there will be more humans than the Earth can sustain.
when the aliens finally arrive, we can ask them if it's "fair" where they came from. I doubt it.
you re very likely italian. you are definitely not myopic, bc u don't wear glasses in other vids
😂 I'm Dutch, also usually I wear contact lenses