This would work for a family of 4. I drive a Highlander and only use my third row 2-3x a year. I’m highly considering this as my next vehicle upgrade. I do wish they had more interior color options. I love a contrast.
Appreciate the feedback! I didn’t push it too hard on turns honestly but the adaptive dampers will definitely help if you want something with less body roll. I’d definitely test drive it if I were you to see how it is compared to your expectations.
My assessment is based on what I observed at the Auto Show in California. For comparing this SUV, I recommend examining others. To attend, both my wife and I had to pay a $30 fee, and I was particularly eager to personally see the Lexus GX due to the hype surrounding it as a large off-road SUV. Before I outline the positives and negatives, I want to express my anticipation spanning decades for the GX to unveil a new design. However, I am disappointed with what I encountered. Pros: * The shape is commendable, featuring a perfect boxy design akin to competitors such as the Defender, Jeep Cherokee, and GMC. * While the central infotainment system is not groundbreaking, it maintains consistency with other Lexus models, which is acceptable. * Cons: * There are numerous drawbacks. The model I viewed exceeded $77k and lacked the ML sound system. * The absence of a panoramic sunroof, now a standard feature in modern vehicles, detracts from the luxurious experience. * The panoramic sunroof in the Luxury+ model is underwhelming and seems to mimic the idea from the Venza, which has been on the market for over six years. * The quality of leather and interior falls short compared to other SUVs in the same price range. Even the Toyota Highlander boasts superior interior quality. * The exterior feels excessively plastic, particularly upon contact with the bumper, hood, and other body panels. * Leather quality across all trims is subpar. * Fuel economy poses a significant issue in 2024, averaging only 17 mpg. * Many materials exude a cheap feel, failing to deliver a luxurious experience. * If one opts for all available options on the Lexus GX 550, it may be preferable to choose the LX 600, which offers a higher level of luxury and power. * For a better depiction of luxury, consider examining the Infiniti QX80: czcams.com/video/NMzD7nLQlDY/video.html I've been a longtime enthusiast of this SUV, but now, even surpassing $80k plus tax, it's hardly worth the investment. In 2024, there's a myriad of alternative options I've contemplated, including the Ford F150 Electric, Rivian, Cybertruck, GMC Denali AT4, Sequoia, and the Volkswagen Atlas Off-Road version, among others, boasting advanced technology and commendable qualities. Toyota and Lexus seem to be marketing very basic vehicles under the guise of reliability. Many individuals I conversed with at the auto show shared my sentiment that the GX 550 pales in comparison to the 460 in terms of quality, feeling cheaply constructed. It appears that CZcams influencers may be sponsored by Toyota and Lexus, with many Toyota dealers hyping these vehicles on social media to attract buyers. This SUV no longer epitomizes luxury, not by a long shot. If you disregard reliability and juxtapose it against brands like BMW, Audi, and Land Rover, it's disheartening to witness its decline. Purchasing this vehicle entails enduring it for another six years solely to mitigate depreciation, while numerous other automakers are already introducing superior and more advanced technology. At present, I must explore alternative options, as this SUV is not worth $85k out of the door, if you're fortunate enough. Best wishes with your new purchase. Just bear in mind, many individuals are compensated for endorsing Toyota and Lexus brands, and I've encountered numerous instances of Toyota dealers leveraging social media to generate interest in these vehicles. In conclusion, this is merely my perspective. Enjoy your new purchase
A rear locker is unnecessary on a truck with center locker and atrac. Toyota added it on the overtrail for those that don't understand how good their ATRAC system is. Its well known, tested and proven that the ATRAC system is superior to locking the rear and is in fact what Toyota suggests doing. The only thing you are really missing between this model and the overtrail is the extra articulation (around 2.5") of the overtrail model.
Maybe if you never venture past the curb at Starbucks. Lockers absolutely still have their place for people who actually do real offroading. ATRAC is very capable but it can't reproduce the same results as a fully locked rear in extreme conditions.
@@marcochavanne You've made a lot of assumptions about someone you don't know. All hail the real off-roader Marcohavanne. I do more off-roading on the way to work than the majority of the rest of the world. So do most people who live in Northern Canada.
@@marcochavanne Yours is uninformed. Keep attacking me though as that is a real argument to anything. Toyota's literal recommendation is to not use the rear locker as the Atrac system is superior. Its also been shown to be such on more youtube videos than I can count.
I was thinking I’d have to buy aftermarket wheels to get 20’inch wheels for it. They should fit because nothing changes with the brakes but the 22 will be aweful on our crappy roads
@@flapflapflap349hp is right in line with the Defender equipped with the I6, same thing for the Grand Cherokee L, The GX does not need to be extensively family friendly, that is what the TX is for 😊
It is expensive but you have no basis to say a Land Cruiser is fancier. It is stated and projected that the Land Cruiser will be more stripped down and affordable, which is should be to appeal to that demographic.
@@donkisler3538 not even in parallel universe It costs £85k for the basic model Never at the reach of an ordinary customer Hence going with range rover or a mercedes
And this does not compete with an Armada, the Armada does 0-60 between 6.5-6.7, and the GX does it in 6.5-6.6. Very negligible difference. This without a doubt is much better off-road cos that’s what it is meant to do.
@@alwaysiyi272 i think youre talking speed. Off road is way different league. Look up Nissan Patrol Off road on Car Experts. They do all tests for SUVs thats made for climbing hills. This doesnt compare to a land cruiser. Its just a good looking SUV.
This would work for a family of 4. I drive a Highlander and only use my third row 2-3x a year. I’m highly considering this as my next vehicle upgrade. I do wish they had more interior color options. I love a contrast.
You’re a pretty good reviewer, informative , not corny, no babbling etc.
My question is , how bad is the body roll while during hard on road driving?
Appreciate the feedback! I didn’t push it too hard on turns honestly but the adaptive dampers will definitely help if you want something with less body roll. I’d definitely test drive it if I were you to see how it is compared to your expectations.
My assessment is based on what I observed at the Auto Show in California. For comparing this SUV, I recommend examining others. To attend, both my wife and I had to pay a $30 fee, and I was particularly eager to personally see the Lexus GX due to the hype surrounding it as a large off-road SUV.
Before I outline the positives and negatives, I want to express my anticipation spanning decades for the GX to unveil a new design. However, I am disappointed with what I encountered.
Pros:
* The shape is commendable, featuring a perfect boxy design akin to competitors such as the Defender, Jeep Cherokee, and GMC.
* While the central infotainment system is not groundbreaking, it maintains consistency with other Lexus models, which is acceptable.
*
Cons:
* There are numerous drawbacks. The model I viewed exceeded $77k and lacked the ML sound system.
* The absence of a panoramic sunroof, now a standard feature in modern vehicles, detracts from the luxurious experience.
* The panoramic sunroof in the Luxury+ model is underwhelming and seems to mimic the idea from the Venza, which has been on the market for over six years.
* The quality of leather and interior falls short compared to other SUVs in the same price range. Even the Toyota Highlander boasts superior interior quality.
* The exterior feels excessively plastic, particularly upon contact with the bumper, hood, and other body panels.
* Leather quality across all trims is subpar.
* Fuel economy poses a significant issue in 2024, averaging only 17 mpg.
* Many materials exude a cheap feel, failing to deliver a luxurious experience.
* If one opts for all available options on the Lexus GX 550, it may be preferable to choose the LX 600, which offers a higher level of luxury and power.
* For a better depiction of luxury, consider examining the Infiniti QX80: czcams.com/video/NMzD7nLQlDY/video.html
I've been a longtime enthusiast of this SUV, but now, even surpassing $80k plus tax, it's hardly worth the investment. In 2024, there's a myriad of alternative options I've contemplated, including the Ford F150 Electric, Rivian, Cybertruck, GMC Denali AT4, Sequoia, and the Volkswagen Atlas Off-Road version, among others, boasting advanced technology and commendable qualities.
Toyota and Lexus seem to be marketing very basic vehicles under the guise of reliability. Many individuals I conversed with at the auto show shared my sentiment that the GX 550 pales in comparison to the 460 in terms of quality, feeling cheaply constructed.
It appears that CZcams influencers may be sponsored by Toyota and Lexus, with many Toyota dealers hyping these vehicles on social media to attract buyers.
This SUV no longer epitomizes luxury, not by a long shot. If you disregard reliability and juxtapose it against brands like BMW, Audi, and Land Rover, it's disheartening to witness its decline.
Purchasing this vehicle entails enduring it for another six years solely to mitigate depreciation, while numerous other automakers are already introducing superior and more advanced technology.
At present, I must explore alternative options, as this SUV is not worth $85k out of the door, if you're fortunate enough.
Best wishes with your new purchase. Just bear in mind, many individuals are compensated for endorsing Toyota and Lexus brands, and I've encountered numerous instances of Toyota dealers leveraging social media to generate interest in these vehicles.
In conclusion, this is merely my perspective. Enjoy your new purchase
A rear locker is unnecessary on a truck with center locker and atrac. Toyota added it on the overtrail for those that don't understand how good their ATRAC system is. Its well known, tested and proven that the ATRAC system is superior to locking the rear and is in fact what Toyota suggests doing. The only thing you are really missing between this model and the overtrail is the extra articulation (around 2.5") of the overtrail model.
Maybe if you never venture past the curb at Starbucks. Lockers absolutely still have their place for people who actually do real offroading. ATRAC is very capable but it can't reproduce the same results as a fully locked rear in extreme conditions.
@@marcochavanne You've made a lot of assumptions about someone you don't know. All hail the real off-roader Marcohavanne. I do more off-roading on the way to work than the majority of the rest of the world. So do most people who live in Northern Canada.
Your initial statement is categorically false and laughable. Keep trying to save face buddy.
@@marcochavanne Yours is uninformed. Keep attacking me though as that is a real argument to anything. Toyota's literal recommendation is to not use the rear locker as the Atrac system is superior. Its also been shown to be such on more youtube videos than I can count.
@@trevoC132 if it was useless they wouldn't include it 🤡
Great interior demo here!
GREAT REVIEW - I LOVE IT
How much road do you feel with these 22’s? Crazy that I can’t get luxury plus with 20’s
I was thinking the same thing. Those 22 inch rims are going to worsen the ride quality.
I was thinking I’d have to buy aftermarket wheels to get 20’inch wheels for it. They should fit because nothing changes with the brakes but the 22 will be aweful on our crappy roads
At 12mpg, this is a really nice expensive gas station.
For 85k I would rather purchase a slightly used Escalade.
So go ahead. I dare you.
This a four seater and for a particular demographic. If you want a true family car, get the TX.
Agreed
bit odd that the third row seats aren't fully across the row. just needs an EXL version with a bigger trunk annd itll be a perfect buy
Lexus sells the TX if you need more space
does it have laminated front and side glasses ????????????
Yes
Not enough HP to compete with the other luxury model suvs
Who cares the reviewer is hot
@@flapflapflap349hp is right in line with the Defender equipped with the I6, same thing for the Grand Cherokee L, The GX does not need to be extensively family friendly, that is what the TX is for 😊
There’s a hybrid with more power coming in. Toyota is good with hybrid systems.
Look at the torque number.Do you guys understand HP?What the desired outcome is?
@@Dreamer10888You’re gonna get on your knees for him
Are you? 😂
A land cruiser being fancier .... no thanks for $85k....no thanks
It is expensive but you have no basis to say a Land Cruiser is fancier. It is stated and projected that the Land Cruiser will be more stripped down and affordable, which is should be to appeal to that demographic.
@@donkisler3538 not even in parallel universe
It costs £85k for the basic model
Never at the reach of an ordinary customer
Hence going with range rover or a mercedes
An upscaled land cruiser for $85k . No thanks
67k for base it’s a lot nicer then most newer suvs.
@@leonel9110 not really....you paint a lc for lexus badging will never work
@@tesla_models the majority disagrees but go on
@@leonel9110 but not here in europe
Not recommend for family
My Armada is wayyy better performance than this, and bigger! and price is never hitting 85k!
And this does not compete with an Armada, the Armada does 0-60 between 6.5-6.7, and the GX does it in 6.5-6.6. Very negligible difference. This without a doubt is much better off-road cos that’s what it is meant to do.
@@alwaysiyi272 i think youre talking speed. Off road is way different league. Look up Nissan Patrol Off road on Car Experts. They do all tests for SUVs thats made for climbing hills. This doesnt compare to a land cruiser. Its just a good looking SUV.
@@Martykoi but the GX is a land cruiser underneath, just with more leather
This is way nicer and more reliable then your Armada it just doesn’t have much space inside