Massive SpaceX Starship Upgrade: Could This Really Work!?
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 06. 2024
- Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 60% OFF your subscription ➡️ Here: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=usa-influ...
This has been a whirlwind of ground breaking updates as SpaceX prepares for test flight 5. Not only that, they have done huge testing this week. This is a Massive SpaceX Starship Upgrade. Could This Really Work!? I tell you, it is exciting to watch this play out. Along with that we have Record-breaking rocket launches and spectacles like this! Indeed, the space industry is absolutely buzzing with excitement. There is so much to cover today so sit back and relax. This one is dense! We have Falcon Heavy - GOES-U, Starlink Group 10-2 , Group 9-2 & Group 10-3 and NROL-186 (expected Starshiled), Starliner Return now in July, and update on Vulcan’s Second Flight, and finally Chang`e 6 and SVOM.
👕Like this shirt? Pick it up on any product you like here.
marcus-house.myspreadshop.com...
and also on darker colors if you prefer
marcus-house.myspreadshop.com...
🎁 Marcus House Merch - marcus-house.myspreadshop.com/
You can support me on:
Patreon - / marcushouse
Join my Discord - / discord
Follow/Subscribe on Twitter - / marcushouse
The production crew:
GameplayReviewUK, TiagoCruz, Mr Pleasant, Virtu, Orbitly, Shaun Gisler
Support from the below is always massively appreciated:
📷 Life at Stage Zero - x.com/lifeatstagezero
📷 NASASpaceFlight - / @nasaspaceflight
📷 RGVAerialPhotography - / @rgvaerialphotography
📷 Randolph Visuals - / cosmicalchief
📷 Greg Scott - / gregscott_photo
📷 Starship Gazer - / starshipgazer
📷 Cosmic Perspective - / @cosmicperspective
📷 LabPadre - / @labpadre
Set models:
😍 Mini venting Starship/SLS - stardesk.peachs.co/a/marcus-h...
😍 Starship, & Crew Dragon by - morethan3d.com/
😍 Moon/Mars Mova Globes - www.movaglobes.com/
😍 Saturn V - LEGO - www.lego.com/en-au/product/le...
😍 Space Shuttle - LEGO - www.lego.com/en-au/product/na...
3D artist magicians:
✨ Tony Bela - / infographictony
✨ Ryan Hansen Space - / ryanhansenspace
✨ Erc X - / ercxspace
✨ Corey - / c_bass3d
✨ Alex Svan - / alexsvanart
✨ DeepSpaceCourier - / ds_courier
✨ SpaceXvision - / spacexvision
✨ Stanley Creative - / caspar_stanley
✨ TijnM_3DAnimations - / m_tijn
✨ Christian Debney - / christiandebney
✨ Evan Karen - / @evankaren
✨ 3D Daniel - / 3ddaniel1 - Věda a technologie
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 60% OFF your subscription ➡ Here: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=usa-influ-eg-dt-1m&btp=default&CZcams&Influencer..Jun-2024..USA-TATAM..1200m60-yt-marcushouse-jun-2024
Easy lift off
Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship
Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery
can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space
Can lift more than 100 Ton
Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity?
It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums:
A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time.
The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof.
.
.
In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like.
People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
@@dadearinto5546Exactly.. Which lends credit to the fact this is a horse and pony show for laundering massive amounts of money.
16:30 Who else would we trust to deorbit the ISS? I would just turn over maintenance of the station to Boeing. No explicit mention of deorbiting it needed.
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Lmao
pin this comment for after deorbit attempt
sure and then 50 years after deadline to deorbit its still there, we could see this as a double win. unless tax payer money is involved
Sensational headlines aside, Starliner’s problems do beg the question as to whether this flight was/is sufficient to certify it as “operational”.
Would you risk your life in a return flight or tell Boeing and nasa to do one
For all the time and money they have been given you'd at least expect Starliner to be around as good as Dragon but the fact is it's not even a close second.
its fine. bring them back.
@@ThatOpalGuy its fine. bring them back.
If it was fine they would have been back already.
@@Scanner9631 The service module has little to nothing to do with the safety of re-entry. It will be trashed before heating begins.
I'm living for this catch
Please please please be successful.
This will be one of the most amazing sights in human history
Anyone in Wichita, KS who plans on being at Boca Chica for IFT 5? I saw Neil Armstrong step on the moon. I was 12 years old. I want to witness the IFT 5, especially the catch attempt. IF someone from Wichita IS going, I'll happily spring for half the gas and driving!! Respond here if you are interested. I'm a responsible retired chef looking for Mars!
@@bandarnesit was known that they will not catch with gridfins for a long time. Idea about gridfins was floating at the beginning of this chopsticks idea. Probably gridfins are considered just as backup catch points
@@bandarnes that bigot Muks is a liar? That is what you should believe.
lets hope this won't be IFT-1 all over again.
@@AutoBotPlays naaah. It will go over tower/starbase only if it will bleed off velocity and will have control over engines. In that case, almost empty booster even with crash, it will not make much more mess than standard test to destruction like plenty others during development
You mean to tell me that China is not overly concerned with the safety and well-being of their citizens? Imagine my shock... 😐😒
China doesn't give AF about human rights. Even when they are Chinese citizens, unfortunately.
Boy do I have some bad news about America for you
What makes this extra fun is that no matter HOW the early catch attempts go we know the program moves forward.
Its not as if NASA will shut the program down for a 3 year investigation if the chopsticks get sheared off.
You know that if the first catch ends up with the tower completely yeeted into the ocean Elon will high five the crew and the rebuild will start immediately.
and just think of the views, and clicks!! the publicity will be huge, no matter the result of this catch attempt :)
Success is not guaranteed, excitement is.
RUD'ing the tower would defiantly be exciting to watch.
nasa doesnt control this program.
Bear in mind that the tower and launch platform will probably need rebuilding or replacement very shortly anyway. Version II is a different but similar animal to Version I, and Version I is rougher on the launch facility than anyone had originally planned for. So I think SpaceX is going to go ahead and bite the bullet and get the work started once the 2nd tower and platform are ready.
Dropping rockets with toxic chemicals on populated areas is quite dystopian.
Thanks for making a point about why Starliner is being kept in space. The ability of SpaceX to make continual improvements in Falcon 9 is/was fundamentally aided by being able to examine the booster components after landing. Boeing will not have that chance, and wants to get as much data out of that trunk as possible. Nice presentation.
Weak Boeing cope.
@@leonardbakersMaybe. Seems more likely that everyone is NOT lying, and it actually IS the service module that’s being problematic, and the capsule will be fine.
@@737smartin
The issues are the thrusters that will cause the de-orbit which are inn that module. If they fail the capsule may not de-orbit for years or may be on an un-survivable trajectory (or impact an inhabited locale).
@@Scanner9631 Excuse me. At present, only one thruster out of something like 30 is out. The four other units came up after hot fire, which points to some sort of freeze up and an overly conservative computer monitoring every little fart and belch of the system. So I just know that you are a rocket scientist or something, right? Or is it that you watch a lot of TV and You Tube videos? Anyway, NASA learned long ago that you have to be open about things. They have been doing that since Apollo. They relearned it during the Shuttle period. When you lie, it comes back to bite you. I think it is entirely likely that the helium leaks are much like that ISS pressure leak was a year ago - detectable only by instruments. Why else would they be comfortable keeping the spacecraft at ISS for a month? They have been continuing to hot fire the thrusters while docked to the station to get data. BTW that is something that Crew Dragon CANNOT DO. Once they solve this intermittent thruster problem, the Starliner will be the only crewed vehicle that can also reboost the ISS.
Wow! The engineering teams at Spacex are truly exceptional!!!!! How in the world are they getting all this designed and built in so little time? The pace is next level!!!!
Mass production of product that was designed from scratch about mass production. That is additional level of complexity for starship system. Using as little machined parts as possible. Using cheap materials that are easy to process instead "space grade materials" that are light and strong, but very expensive and complicated to work with. This is why they achieved price per full stack, powered by most advanced engine (full flow staged combustion engine is peak of rocket technology rn. There is research on rotation explosive engines that are even more advanced, but rn it's only in lab. (I don't count electric/nuclear engines.)
I think if not that push for mass production Starship would be operational for at least 3-4 years. But cost would be much, much higher
No government BS /red tape with Space X
Raptor engines look so streamlined compared to Blue Origins BE-4 engines.
You’re so right! Anything with Blue Origin moves as slow as a snail. SpaceX is like a rabbit lol
@@wesleylahman3710 A rabbit that never stops
BE-4 is also larger than Raptor, just FYI
Remember what the first version of Raptors looked like? Early engines look like plumber's nightmares, because of all the monitoring equipment. You are comparing apples to oranges, by commenting on how much slimmer Raptors V2 are to the BE-4 V1.
they are designed to mass manufacturing. It's the key the both Tesla and Space X success.
They have perfected the falcon booster landings. It took some time of course but they will achieve this goal also. I can’t wait to see it!!
Really liked the explanation of the Star Liner. It makes sense to study the "trunk" while it still exists.
Elon said during his interview with Tim Dodd that launch tower 2 will be taller than launch tower 1, that the chopsticks will be shorter , meaning they will have less inertia, meaning that they will be able to move quicker than the launch tower 1 chopsticks. And finally ...Elon said that launch tower 2 will have a COMPLETELY REDESIGNED OLM, with a .. wait for it...DUN DUN DUNNNN, A PROPER FLAME TRENCH... About time too , considering some of us have been saying since the start that a proper flame trench was going to be required, especially since Space X want to be able to launch starships daily and eventually even quicker than that. The bidet system was a short term fix that was never gonna cut it long term. I'm guessing it could be a scaled up version of the flame diverter trench at Massey's test
Site. Will be interesting to see.
Did you see elons kids there? Dude it felt like I was watching a Walmart dad when I saw all of them
I doubt the 2nd OLM will have anything like a traditional flame trench as it just wouldn't work. It is more likely to be a flame deflector with the same shower head setup built into it. Containing the energy from 35 raptors into a trench will just not be possible, better to let is dissipate in the open like the 1st OLM but with a deflector designed to improve dissipation and reduce reflections back up to the rocket.
@@schrodingerscat1863 elon has confirmed it will be a flame trench. and why wourldnt it make sense? more area the engines plumes can get out from
The flame trench is something we know little about right now. Trying to find some clues on that before talking too much about it. Looks like we may have a few signs in the latest RGV flight.
@@leafboye33Nothing Walmart about Elon... Don't like the reference.
This will be the next big moment. We got a booster landing, then a double booster landing with Falcon Heavy, then a successful belly flop with a Starship. Up next is catching the largest booster ever out of the air. Gonna be wild.
4 Falcon 9's & a falcon heavy in one week is insane, image showing that to someone 20 years ago
Watching the re entry footage just highlights how well the team did in building the Space Shuttle back in the 70s.
Well yes and no....the space shuttle was called "the flying brick" by the pilots for a reason. It has very little relative control on re-entry compared to Starship, it's smaller in size, and therefore the amount of displaced atmosphere-turned-plasma trying to eat through the body is both smaller and of lower velocity. Even then it couldn't survive the level of damage shown on Starship's last flight, which caused the shuttle Columbia to disintegrate during re-entry. Bizarrely, safety-conscious NASA never developed a procedure for tile damage during flight and they just basically YOLOed its re-entry with a crew aboard....they never even sent anyone out to inspect the damage.
I’m glad I’ve lived long enough to see this. I was born before we went to the moon. My great grandmother was born before there were planes.
Pathetic comment
China is no different than other dictatorships. People don't matter, only results matter.
Great video Marcus. Have a happy vacation. You deserve one.
Can you imagine that happening in the US or Europe!!
I can't wait for the next flight, this will be so awesome and a step further in the right direction to mars 🚀🚀🚀🚀
Thanks for the update Marcus! Regarding the Chinese rocket, I sure hope international space organizations think twice about using their rockets for payload (France, ahem...).
Never trust China…
Marcus, how come it's so oddly satisfying to hear you say "and I will see you in the next video". Lol
In regards to the designs you make for each of the launches i would love to see a Velcro or sew on patch to put on rucksacks and things.
I watch a bunch of weekly space news update channels, just to help drum in what amazing things happen week to week, but this channel is my go to for all the facts and information. Thanks Marcus and team.
Thanks Marcus and Team...! " If you Build it they will come. "
Saturday mornings have become my favorite day recently, as I am always looking forward for the next Marcus House video.. Good Job man!!!
Thanks Marcus. You're my one must-watch video every Saturday
same!
Hey Hey Marcus! Thanks so much for the great and consistent content! Best to you and your team!!!
That was a ton of information! Very fast! Hope a glass of water was near by!!! Thanks for the week long summary!!!
Another great update guys 👍
great stuff. Thanks mate
Thank you Marcus, I love following you 🥰
Falcon launches viewed from SoCal have been amazing. The twilight timing makes a good bright rocket across the sky experience.
Thanks, Marcus!!
Can you imagine what would happen if SpaceX dropped a booster like that into a town?
Yes .10,000 fanboys saying it was a successful test.
@@TheMoneypresident Let me guess ur a thunderf00t fan. I would imagine that nearly all spacex fanboys would condemn that.
@@MrShaapey no just against idiots.
Good morning Marcus and team.
Thanks for all the updates.
Hi Marcus house thanks for a another wonderful video of the space industry plenty of new stuff going on there David 🚀👍👌❤️🇬🇧🍀
Nice!
Good one Marcus
Brilliant; fast; action packed; beautiful images and videos. Supremely professional!
I can't freaking wait to see these tested!
Excellent as usual 👍🏻
What a week. Amazing look thank you MH
Great show! Wondrous flights of fancy and fantasy! Thank you! Well done! 🏆
Simply Brilliant Marcus - thank you
Thank you, a great synopsis as alway
Brilliantly done
Thanks!
Marcus, this was by far - your very best update video. Just wonderful. :D
Another great episode, Marcus!
Thanks very much.
Super great info Markus! Love your dedication! Please keep up the awesome job! For the Babel app, as an international photographer and videographer I am always needing to quickly learn the language of the area I'm working in. In the past I've used other apps and quickly moved back to Babel. It's awesome!
Those fuel tanks are beautiful. Put some Raptor V2s underneath them, and launch them!
Awesome Video.
Thanks as always Marcus and team...high anticipation for the "catch" of the year...😂
Cheers Marcus 🍻
Saw that rocket take off yesterday!
I love your updates Marcus, you always lift my spirits 🙏
Should have tried the catch with the Hopper
Nice job
What a week! Bonkers.
18:35 I want that monitor setup for my PC!
Good video. I'll be back to finish after work break is over again.
It is definitely going to work
Excited for the catch attempt but can't quite understand how they're going to get the lifting points in the right orientation for a catch. Do the really have that level of yaw control while doing the landing burn?
awersome as ever!
Rock on Marcus
Unbelievable just how much is going on with Space X. .
Another surberb roundup of space goodness. .
Thank you MH + Team for for your excellent continuing coverage
Hey there Rob! Great to see you mate!
SPACE!!!!
Ahhh, another Saturday
Hey Marcus great video-again!
Good shots of Falcon9 first stage landing, but my understanding of the green flame at the extinguishing of the engines is oxygen rich recombination, not the TEA-TEB green flame at the ignition sequence... Just my 2 cents
I wonder if the movement in the lifting points is intentional and trips a switch to reduce or even shut down the engines on contact. Like squat switches on aircraft landing gear to actuate spoilers.
Your content is so informative. Love it.
Thanks
12:59 Amazing landing shots by Greg Scott! 😮
Hey Marcus, great stuff as always. I wonder if you can tell us anything about how, where these 10’s of K’s of heat shield tiles are manufactured? They sure have a LOT of them and constantly resizing and redesigning them. I am sure it’s in house, right? On starbase? Where exactly? Didn’t see it on Tim’s tour. Elsewhere?
There needs to be a giant damper between the 2 arms to prevent bounce. Just like a car suspension.
Pure gold. Thanks for putting these videos together.
Glad you like them!
13:41 -- I often wondered how small the earth appears from a geostationary orbit! Amazing!
Keep in mind that the lens on the camera has a lot to do with that. Wider angle lenses make the earth look smaller, and telephoto lenses make the earth look bigger.
Yey Hey Hey!
And right on time.
Thanks, I continue to appreciate the range of your coverage, especially non-US activities. All the best
Thanks for the updates. Space is hard, but the drive to learn and explore is strong. The announced booster catch will be spectacular. With all the experience from falcon I would expect a successful event. Hopefully, the engineers are making the decisions as they are ready to proceed.
Awesome episode! Thanks for continuing your excellent format and super high quality information, your team kicks ass!
Why not give these launching tower arms a sort of curved extensions at the ends so that on closing the arms together these extensions bump into each other (sort of closing the circle, although a circle it would not be) and damp the oscillations?
Glad that you were very clear about the issues with Starliner. Im a bit tired of reading the “OMG SpaceX will have to send a rescue mission for the astronauts” style posts.
Cool ufo video. I hope the E.B.E. survived. 5:16
I think it could be stacked by August for sure you know your talking SpaceX.
Marcus, please do a video explaining all the ways the booster catch could go wrong.
They might have one next week
Is it possible you can do a video of the turn around of a booster? I'd love to see a booster which has done over 10 missions go through the paces of being flight worthy again. I'd like to see just how much work goes into it
I am so ridiculously invested in the disassembly of that vertical tank farm I'm almost more excited for news about that than anything else :P
I wonder if most or all of the pieces of the International Space Station could fit inside SpaceX Starships returning to Earth? Imagine the ISS preserved as a museum. I realize it's highly unlikely.
It’s possible though, just never done before
Every single module would fit. All of them at once? No chance.
They probably could all fit, depends on how big the cargo bay on the Starship will be in the final version but the ISS was built by a couple of Proton rockets, Space Shuttles, Soyuz and Falcon 9s. Preserving at least a few bits would be nice for sure, getting it all back would be super costly requiring multiple dozens of launches I reckon.
It'd be far far cheaper to just build a replica on Earth.
@@Destarn If 1 Starship launch is lets say 2 million dollars in near future - up to like 40 million dollars to get ISS back to earth. Tho i dont thing starship can properly re-enter and land with this much mass and shitted center of mass. Its made to launch payload, not really return it
I imagine I must've missed it along the way but has there ever been a report (vidumentary) on what all goes into refurbishing a Falcon 9 booster?
I would like to see the astronauts return on starliner myself. And the starliner program iron out all there kinks.
I am just a little over cautious about astronauts riding on a vessel that has to be tested DURING a human rated flight.
Of course this has to do with the space shuttles blowing up when I was a kid in school. Good luck best wishes.
wow some amazing edits on this. How did you drive both cars. Did you and your wife race?
10:12 I was hoping for a patch for my lab coat. Maybe? ❤
Do they have cushening contact material that surounds the tank completely for better stability and less damage possibilities?
So surely *both* arms move? Else how is the booster going to be accurate enough to just skim the static arm and engage with the pin?🤔
I would think about a fireproof paint under the tiles
Are we sure it's just the propulsion with Stayliner? My guess is the door fell off.
Yes, how are they supposed to study what to do about the fat lazy boomers that built it from orbit?
And half the other pieces too. The astronauts signing up to ride this have a serious death wish.
no man, if the door fell off the fuzzy dice would have fallen out.
its fun to be wrong.
I enjoy your SpaceX updates, but I REALLY miss your KSP videos. More please.