The zeiss is obviously not a night or low light lens. It's a great lens. It's not for bokeh and night shooting.I can use a 200$ F 1.2 prime for low light and easily compare to the 2.8 GM.. at f8 and what most people do...shoot in the day.. the zeiss is a great lens.
could someone tell me what a comparison between 2300€ and 680€ lens is worth ? someone who can will buy the gm , but for most people on a budget that test is absolutely worthless, yes i learn that a much more expensive lens is better ,of course otherwise you could call it a scam. compare lenses of same price class.
Its a great review, but i think it doesn't makes sense that you are comparing the gm f2.8 to the zeiss f4.0... it would be a better comparison to do gm f4.0 vs zeiss f4.0
Looks like you mislabelled or mixed up the stabilisation tests as the labelled GM 2.8 is darker than the Z 4 and much more stable (where you said that the Z 4 is more stable). Could you check?
Thanks for checking. Still it's a bit strange, as you say that the 24-70 Zeiss f4 is more stable with its optical stabilisation, when in fact the video on the right is far more stable, at least to my eye. @@NOlimitsON
What would you pick? 24-70 GM II lens, or a different option?
#Sony2470GM #Sony2470f28 #Sony2470f28GMII
The zeiss is obviously not a night or low light lens. It's a great lens. It's not for bokeh and night shooting.I can use a 200$ F 1.2 prime for low light and easily compare to the 2.8 GM.. at f8 and what most people do...shoot in the day.. the zeiss is a great lens.
nicely done! I’ve been using the Sigma ART and love it
Thanks mate) stay tuned!
between sigma art vs sony GM gen 1, what do you prefer?
never used the sony gm v1, but i love the sigma. just bought their new 70-200 too and love it
I think if budget is a bit tight then Samyang's new 24-70mm f/2.8 AF is the best choice. Also it cost nearly as much as the Zeiss.
Not a bad choice)
And weights a ton...
@@rayhinto But be mindful of the Samyang 24-70mm f2.8 as many have got faulty, broken ones.
@@Bo_Hazem I will pick the sigma 28-70 f2,8 it is an high end product and only around 400g
@@rayhinto I have it, its focus breathing is perfect for video. Cons are the yellow tint and the focus isn't as fast as the GM. Would say 9/10.
could someone tell me what a comparison between 2300€ and 680€ lens is worth ?
someone who can will buy the gm , but for most people on a budget that test is absolutely worthless, yes i learn that a much more expensive lens is better ,of course otherwise you could call it a scam.
compare lenses of same price class.
what model of diapters did you use in the comparison with the zeiss lens? thanks
Some cheap no name diopters from AliExpress
thanks man , I appreciate your excellent work
Thank you!
Expect mobile camera composition in next video
Its a great review, but i think it doesn't makes sense that you are comparing the gm f2.8 to the zeiss f4.0... it would be a better comparison to do gm f4.0 vs zeiss f4.0
Looks like you mislabelled or mixed up the stabilisation tests as the labelled GM 2.8 is darker than the Z 4 and much more stable (where you said that the Z 4 is more stable). Could you check?
it's actually correct) I've double checked it
Thanks for checking. Still it's a bit strange, as you say that the 24-70 Zeiss f4 is more stable with its optical stabilisation, when in fact the video on the right is far more stable, at least to my eye. @@NOlimitsON
Excellent review
Thanks mate! Stay tuned!