Watch Live: Staged Suicide Murder Trial - OH v. Matheau Moore Day 5
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 08. 2024
- A man allegedly murdered his wife and made it look like a suicide. Matheau Moore, 51, stands trial in Delaware County, Ohio.
Wife Emily Noble, 52, was last seen on her birthday: May 24, 2020. She was reported missing the next day. Her body turned up in tragic and grisly fashion the following Sept. 16. She was found hanging from a tree in a wooded area near her home. There was reportedly a 20-inch USB cord around her neck. There were multiple injuries to her head and neck. Authorities determined that this was homicide.
Noble was so badly decomposed authorities had to use dental records to identify her.
Prosecutors argue Moore killed her and staged the hanging. He faces charges of murder and felonious assault.
Moore’s previous wife Lisa Pedersen told WBNS in a June 2021 report that he once choked her when she was pregnant with their first son. It was New Year’s Day 2001, she said. They had been married three months.
“He came over, and he did, for some reason, he ended up, yeah, putting his hands around my neck,” she reportedly said. “And he started to choke me.”
It was the only time he put a hand on her, and they kept in touch throughout the years, Pedersen said. Though they maintained contact, she noted that he, contrary to contemporaneous media reports, claimed to be participating in the search for Noble.
“Once the details were made clear to me, I started to lean toward his guilt,” she said.
Both of their sons are now dead, according to WBNS. One of the children reportedly died at 17 by hanging in a park the summer before Noble’s disappearance.
#StagedSuicideMurderTrial #MatheauMoore #lawandcrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on CZcamsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK CZcams CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam - Zábava
📌 Day Five time stamps:
0:14:44 1st witness Charles Carlson testimony
0:41:04 1st witness cross examination
0:59:39 1st witness answers Jury questions
1:33:40 Expert witness Dr. Amanda Agnew testimony
2:53:35 Cross-exam of Dr. Agnew
4:39:50 Resuming cross-exam of Dr. Agnew
5:11:44 Redirect examination of Dr. Agnew
5:20:50 Jury questions for Dr. Agnew
5:55:55 Expert Witness Dr. William Smock testimony
7:32:44 Resuming Dr. Smock direct examination
8:03:02 Cross-exam of Dr. Smock
8:50:12 Redirect examination of Dr. Smock
9:04:02 Dr. Smock answers Jury questions
This should be top comment, thanks so much!
Thank you
Question. Do you know if Emily Nobel's psychologist or anyone like that testified and what day of the trial they did?
Always helpful, I was searching for this. Ty again
@@stephwiller9089 No testimony from her therapist, as agreed to in this video at 9:10:11. There was a legal argument at the beginning of Day Three (Part 1) about giving the jury the therapy record to show her mental/psychological state, and Diane Menashe argued her report to the therapist show signs she was struggling. Good question!
Really intelligent questions from the jurors. 👍
Side bars with the Judge…the other 2 prosecutors need to go sit down.
I was thinking same thing. They’re like 3 little pees in a pod-against 1 Queen bee. You’d think they’d win….
My daughter says the female prosecutor needs some anger mgmt courses.
@Christine Cartwright Yes I notice she gets unprofessionally defensive when she disagrees with rulings. I mean you win some you lose some. She is an example we’ve used as not to act during mock trials as not all Judges are this patient.
I love this judges voice, so authoritative and yet kind
The sad reality is if law enforcement had done their job and properly searched for her where her husband told them to they would have had a body to autopsy instead of a bunch of bones to speculate about and we probably wouldn't be watching this trial.
Yes I agree.
I can’t believe how they don’t know anything when there asked unless they see pictures 🤦🏻♀️
And if the guy taking pics at the scene the night she was found took photos of where the cord was around her neck properly, there could have been a more accurate medical report….like where was the knot for instance. And did anyone check her shoes for the toes….too many areas now of inconsistency & doubt!
Why didnt he go search there himself? If it was my wife and I thought she was “there”, Id go there 100x
@@nvd3914 good point
It is absolutely disgusting how the prosecution is salivating to put an innocent man in prison for the rest of his life. They're dead wrong!
Total dishonest for the doctor to say you wouldn't expect to see injuries on someone strangling someone from behind. A victim could easily access the hands, likely even the face, neck, and chest area.
He gave it a definitive "no, there would be no injuries on a strangler who strangles a victim from behind."
That's just a flat out lie.
Depending on surprise & how quickly the victim was rendered unconscious, he could be right. But, more needs to be taken into consideration before making such a blanket statement as no.
Smock is definitely a payed liar
Lord have mercy, if I ever got in need of an attorney, I would want this woman. She doesn't miss a beat !!
why? the dead lady did not get justice.
This defense attorney is excellent. Some people don’t like her because she is not warm and fuzzy, but that is not her job. She is there to vigorously defend her client, and she has gone above and beyond for him.
There is a lot of reasonable doubt in this case, and unless the prosecution can pull a rabbit out of a hat very soon, I don’t see how any juror could convict on this evidence. The defendant may not be likable, and some of us may have a ‘hunch’ or ‘gut feeling’ that he is guilty, but this is criminal court. We don’t rely on hunches and speculation here.
This defense attorney was co-counsel for Dr. Hussel. She is awesome!!!
Nice to see someone being supportive of a criminal defense attorney. Lots of folks hating on Nikolas Cruz lawyers, but don’t seem to understand they’ve got a job to do and just the way it is. Personally I do not believe Matt is innocent, but what a jury decides is just a verdict. Does not mean that he did or didn’t do it. I think we all know OJ did it, but the jury did their job and that was the way it was.
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 and Robert Blake...I thought there was evidence to prove the celebrity cases....this one...it's just not there
@@terrilmatteson9525 i forgot about robert blake! OJ and Casey Anthony always come to my mind.
I have not seen a single bit of evidence against him after five days of listening to the prosecutors.
Unless of course you consider the chubby detective saying "he used her name in the past tense" evidence against him. I mean then instead of murder and conspiracy to commit perhaps they should change the charges to improper syntax and aggravated verb tense.
Dr.'s sware to do no harm! It amazes me everytime when theirs a "Dr." who is willing to put someone in jail for LIFE for a FEE
Money is the great motivator
The public automatically judges someone as guilty before listening to everything. Peoples lives depend on 12 of their peers. Some of these comments are gross. I hope I never have to sit in that seat for any reason. Just because the state brings charges against someone doesn’t mean it’s an automatic guilt. They want a charge no matter what.
He’s guilty law enforcement dropped the ball .. time was on his side
@@sixtyroses8736 lol! Mgee Bee talking about ppl just like you. Absolutely NO evidence. None. Suggest you actually listen to the facts,not your “feelings”. No motive, no opportunity that others wouldn’t have noticed, HOW did he get her into place ppl had to CRAWL to get into. The investigators screwed up so bad the HAD to save face,even with zero evidence.
@@sixtyroses8736 what evidence makes you know that he's guilty?
Matheau won the lottery with this defense attorney.
I can't imagine how much she costs. Totally worth it with your life on the line.
@@plantpants3746 - She is pro bono.
He paid a million dollars for her.
I am five days in. If the state has any evidence against this man at all, they better SHOW IT. Dude has spent over a year in jail for this.
Day 5 and still nothing! I’ve watched a lot of trials now and never seen one quite like this, the state have nothing.
They have something. A bunch of lazy incompetent Detectives
@@amandasummers7881 watched them both. I think she comes across even better here. She doesn't try to prove her point or make witnesses "admit" to her on cross. When her closing is done, you swear she did. Not that there was evidence in Husel, but this case is even less!!
Why would they wait 7 months to return to the scene for the rest of her bones? How did they not thoroughly look the 1st time.... how incompetent.... I believe they were so focused on Matt they forgot about Emily during the investigation. Sad.
How did they manage to loose toes if her feet at socks and shoes on?
@@crocodile2006 yup
@@tiaking2002 Exactly, right!?
Wish I could remember when the sister sent her email. Seems like that might have sparked the investigation as it certainly wasn’t from the evidence.
@@Kayla-ed2rp If you`re referring to one mail she sent about - look at the fibre, hair & stuff, it was when they found her
Prosecutors are too laid back and almost appear incompetent and lack confidence in this courtroom. 🙄
I was thinking the same. They seem green behind the ear
RIGHT THE DUDE HAS A CHRONIC LOOK OF CONFUSION AND LADY CRONICALLY ANNOYED
They lack confidence because they have no case.
Makes them seem utterly uncaring and just wanting their payslips.
Because there is no case and these are trumped up charges.
This judge seems kind and patient, very calm demeanour!
Judge sexy voice.
He has that “gentle giant” thing going on
Firm when he needs to be! Dealt with that pushy female prosecutor sooo well! Cannot stand her.
A complete 180 after watching the Trevor Summers trial!
I only say this half jokingly, but it seems there is no more evidence that the husband did it, than that a random neighbor, or mr Kramer did it.
the husband had no scratches while he allegedly killed her in the woods or brought her body there in the middle of the night. that's just one of many issues. there's also so many questions with the timeline. when did he kill her? where? did he drag her body there? when?
What about this was a subside???
I completely agree. And that hioid (hyoid?) bone looks just like a bone that would have been postmortem break according to the pictures she showed. The stress on it as it aged would have broken .. it seems to me. But of course, I know nothing about it. It just seems to be that type of break according to the previous picture examples. I haven't seen any evidence YET as you said that he did it .. but maybe we will. He is an odd duck .. but .. nothing is shown that he actually did this. He was already having trauma from sons' death, so he didn't go looking for her. That is the ONLY thing that is strange. But I think he knew her well enough .. and he was traumatized .. he just couldn't bring himself to look because he knew she wouldn't just vanish. That part is strange to me. Such an INCREDIBLE JUDGE.
8:03:00
Great cross by the defence lawyer!
He could have been wearing long sleeves, long pants, and gloves. The placement and manner in which the USB cord was used is really suspect too... and what's with that piece of cloth wrapped around her wrist(s)? Some things point to self inflicted death, and others lean towards murder/staged.
I mean considering the amount of flannel in all the pictures it's likely he was wearing long sleeves. ALSO, the P and A trauma to the face and nasal region would suggest he was possibly abusive. Which could indicate he would more likely me her murderer
Just catching up but how can a professional investigator admit to not understanding the difference between objectivity and subjectivity?
At least he understands the concept of bias!
That was weird as Fk.
I mean WTH happened to the education system.
Right?! That was shocking
He was a total numb nuts
He knew the answer would not be favourable to the states case so he tried to sidestep the answer.The defence got it in anyway
@@J-ellO Perhaps, but denying any understanding of what should be a crucial requirement of his job should hurt more.
It would also be perjury.
One of the best defense attorney's in the business imo
In spite of other comments I've made, and still stand by, I have to say if I'm ever accused of a major crime, I'd hope to get Diane Menashe to defend me! She's sharp, thorough and dedicated! A rare gem.
I love her!!! Whether or not i like the defendent is nil, but she is objective, straight forward and clearly a hard worker. i really love her!
Dr Agnew is getting on my last nerve. It's like she's afraid to give any kind of simple answer to anything the defense asks. "The microscope allows you to see things you can't see with the naked eye, right?" "I don't know if I said those words." 🙄 It's not a complicated question!!! Does the microscope allow you to see things you can't see with the naked eye, yes or no?!!! Geeeez.
Wow, claiming he can determine time of death is not only hubris, it's also insanity.
That's now what he said. He said she died after the time of the last known picture of her in the restaurant since it's the last known physical evidence.
Wondering if the prosecution attorney is as exciting in his personal life as he is in his professional life
That's how you act when you know this case is so lost!!!
😂
Love Diann’s side commentary, she is witty, smart and dramatic/theatrical in a good way. She had me laughing so hard as she was cross examining (comb over dude) sorry … as she was trying to call him out on things… Especially with the tick tick tick tick of 62 seconds… she straight up said “is this your thing that you do” when you come to testify as an expert testimony …you’ve been in the same courtroom doing the same tick tick 62 seconds line before with the same state attorney …LOL ! I can’t even😂
I laughed so hard at the Smock cross that I had to come back and watch it again. Beast mode super-charged for the Smockster.🤣
Omg 😆 😂 I just Snapped! You know who the judge reminds me of?! The Movie/Cartoon “UP” with the old grumpy man that floats his house to paradise falls 😂
Mr Frederickson 😂😂 Yeah he does!!
Or however you spell it
I was thinking a senior Clark Kent (original Superman)
BEST defense attorney EVER!!!! Love this woman ❤️
IMAGINE he isn’t guilty and two of his loved ones have hung themselves. Can you imagine the torture it must be to have to sit through this?
And he has also lost both his parents too. That is alot of loss in a short amount of time.
Agreed. If he isn’t guilty, I think he has a major case against the state for putting him through this (and I hope he pursues it). Having to sit there with images of a loved one’s dessicated corpse being projected on a screen to be analyzed by “experts” and gawked at by the people in the back of the courtroom would be just beyond mental and emotional torture. And I still haven’t seen any evidence to connect HIM to this.
I have only watched the trial, I know nothing about this case other than what's been presented in court. I cannot imagine being in his shoes! Innocent until proven guilty. So far they have nothing to show as proof. I think Emily, did this to herself.
@@jmb9377 unfortunately it happens much more often then we even know
Exactly. Serious lack of empathy running amok here.
If I ever need an attorney, hopefully I can afford her. I have become ADDICTED to these trials……other than Michal Barisone’s attorney, she is the best I have seen….reasonable doubt should apply, and he is probably walking away free at the end of this! Can not wait to hear her closing arguments!!
Same!! I can't stop watching full trials. Court can be fascinating, a chess game.
Though there has been grave injustice after grave injustice in his case, both Michael Keetley's attorney through his first trial (now a judge) and his retrial legal legal team were absolutely fantastic. There's nothing like watching an attorney who's righteously indignant. The husband/wife team who took up Ryan Duke's representation in Georgia -- including arguing their way to the GA Supreme Court on an interlocutory appeal -- were incredible, as well.
I so wish people could go watch the Zimmerman trial and just pretend as though they'd never heard a thing the news told them about the case. It's unbelievable how different even the basic facts are than almost everyone believed, and his lawyers' tenacity in the face of bitter pushback was a sight to behold -- especially sparing with a judge who wouldn't admit text messages from a passcode-protected cell phone because ~technically~ there's no way to be certain the person who owned & used the phone, as well as knew the passcode, was the one who wrote each specific message, regardless of the message content identifying the sender (and wouldn't even allow the defense to call the recipients of the messages to confirm _at least_ who _they_ believed they were conversing with in the messages). She acted like the admission of text messages attributed to someone who isn't testifying could _never_ be allowed (even though they already routinely were).
*^ Whether you agreed with the jury on than one or not, you **_have_** to go watch the testimony of Dr. Shiping Bao.* It is the most _bonkers_ testimony I have ever seen, out of decades of trials. (I'm not even talking about his conclusions, or anything like that. He testifies directly off of notes that he then gets angry about the defense wanting to see them, he answers technical questions with random anecdotes that happened to his colleagues... it's _so_ strange; you have to see it for yourself.)
Utmost respect (bordering on awe) at this defendant’s lawyer. She has class, scruples + grit- therefore she presents like a natural in this particular career field. Counsel representing alleged criminals, and murdering monsters are similar to tax collectors and other jobs most ppl despise, but someone has to keep State prosecutors in line, on their toes, and accountable!
She’s so good! She is in the right career that’s for sure.
Class??? Scruples??? She is nasty and rude.
@ Stacy M yes!!!!
@@kimgale262 she isn’t nasty and rude. She is assertive, matter of fact, straight to the point, and direct which is what she needs to be. She is fabulous at her job, which can’t be said for any of the prosecutors in this case. They have proven absolutely nothing.
@@Kayla-ed2rp the prosecutor is trash. She's very unlikable and overly aggressive when she doesn't need to be. She doesn't really have any evidence that he did anything only speculation. You can't convict on speculation
I just laughed out loud, by myself, at this doctor’s remarkable combover.
Did you hear his credentials ? That combover represents several different occupations …😂😂😂 explaining its horribleness…😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He actually looks himself in the mirror and thinks it looks good.
I just can't take him seriously with that hairdo. 😁😂
No matter his credentials.
@@slehernik HAIRDO then!? Take YOU serious?
Poor Matt. He just wants this to end so he can go to Bag of Nails; do vodka shots & smoke one of his Marlboros.
Defendants lawyer is so passionate and excellent. Watched her in other trials too. Love her!!
I love they way she works as well. Any idea of the names of the other trials she's done? Would love to watch more.
What other trials has she done? Would love to check ‘em out.
@@Duffsmom68 Dr Huesl trial
What other trials has the defense attorney done. I would love to see them.
I read through some of these comments and just pray some of you never see a jury trial. Ever.
Yeah go figute
I cannot agree more! These people scare me.
12 jurors acquitted him in 30 minutes. The comments aren't off base.
@shyeahh I didn't think he was guilty so not sure you're seeing the comments I was referring to.
@88jeebs oh ok. Yeah all the comments are pretty pro defense so I figured that's what you meant. My B
Can you ask Dr. Smock to Re-construct his hair.. 😂🤣😂Please? He has to know how ridiculous the strip of hair over his bald head to hide his bald head looks...😧
I didn’t know that hair was on the person Id been listening* to until now 🙉😂
He is an expert in many fields but in hairdressing he failed.
If I was a jury member I’d be so distracted by his attempt to misrepresent his baldness, I don’t think I could believe what he said about anything..
I think it says a lot about him, because it’s a choice, that he’s making daily- an attempt to hide the truth. I know that losing your hair can be difficult, my oldest son started balding in his early twenties, now he’s 25 and looks awesome with his head shaved. It was hard for him to get there but it happens. I know that I wear makeup and color my grays but it’s to look better, not ridiculous..
Are we really making fun of how his hair is? grow up.
That’s the worst comb over I’ve ever seen.
I don’t understand why they cannot just accept that the woman was clearly troubled and she did it to herself. Maybe the family was relentless about it and they felt bad so trying to give her family comfort thinking she didn’t off herself. Because as a sister she should have known and now feels guilty about not being there for her sister after stepson died? There are so many things that could be going on but I definitely don’t feel like it is undoubtedly him who did this. He’s a master at not leaving one iota of evidence anywhere. It’s not like he waits two weeks to clean up then reported her missing. Even if he had done it that’s irrelevant to the reasonable doubt that is still there
The entire trial to date has been nothing other than a display of incompetency, bizarre and fudged conclusions, questionable experts, and extremely hostile and unprofessional prosecutors. Not Guilty. This man is certainly fortunate, unlike many in our society, that Diane is there to represent him.
Dear Expert Witnesses, incredulous smirking (or to play on a name, smug mocking) at basic questions during cross examination adds to your credibility 0 times in 100. Giving off real Spiegel vibes, man…
YES"……"………..
Agree! Makes you look biased vs. objective and if I were a juror I wouldn’t trust the testimony
The real question is how long it takes for bone to dry out in that climate. That's how long it would take for post mortem injuries to happen to support the defense's theory. Then, one would have to explain how an injury happened and whether the corpse's final resting position would support it.
@veggiegirl the case was dropped for his ex wife. No judge would ever let in an accusation from decades ago especially without a conviction.
Why was there NO mention today of the fact that the USB cable was in a position where the bulky part of one end was caught between the two loops of the cable? The prosecution emphasized this fact two or three times on Monday - so much so that the defense objected with “asked and answered”
Where did the point go? Why did it matter so much? Was the thread lost? Maybe I need to rewatch that whole part but it seems strange it was essentially forgotten today.
Wouldn’t the USB being found in such a way mean that the cable was probably not in that position at the time death? The prosecutor and witness (Holcomb, BCI guy) went back and forth that it was only being held to the tree by that and it was taut when found
It’s sO important, yep.
After consideration, I think probably the prosecution was privy to the defense’s attempt to undermine the choice of Holcomb and the other investigator to release the body by cutting the cable - trying to show negligence and/or possible damage to the remains.
@@brady3126 Oh gosh, wow! Of course, the damage to the neck. It’s so possible they could’ve been clumsy when cutting the cord and thus causing more damage to that area. Maybe there was video too and is being washed down the drain. Maybe Menashe is saving that thought? Christ, this is like Columbo.
@@mollycuddle9990 I dunno about that, just guessing about why it was brought up and then never again. Defense probably thought it wasn’t worth pursuing
@@brady3126 it’s okay ☺️ sometimes I jump to conclusions, but, it’s planted a seed in my head so I do wonder what the jury will be thinking. Their questions seem to lend themselves to reasonable doubt in my opinion.
Your comment is an interesting one to me, it got my mind whirring away. 🙋🏻♀️⚡️🐆🎈
So called expert ? Meet Diane .!. No crying 😭
Diane is no expert on this. The witness is the expert. I find her to a bully and disorganized.
Diane …. Hey … so called me expert…. Did you edit your original report AFTER reading the defense experts report ? Answer …. Yes 🥲🥲🥲
@@stevenmccarthy2312 did you just cut and paste 😂
@@tamimoncrief2264
What’s your point? That you don’t like Diane? Other than the so called experts, there are no experts.
The defense attorney is the best. Absolutely love her. Everytime she is up I say get em girl. 😂
My juror question “is THE Ohio State handing out degrees to just anyone “?
Am I missing something? I've been watching this from day 1 & so far see nothing that ties him to her death. I mean ok he likes vodka..ok they had a few arguments..My gosh it's scary to think I could go to prison for life based on those things if anything ever happened to my spouse. I drink from time to time & Lord knows me & my spouse have argued through texts before. Maybe there's something coming up that the prosecution has, but as of yet, I'm not seeing anything. I do understand this is a 2 week trial. Anyone else feel even if he's guilty they are not proving anything beyond a reasonable doubt?
No they have nothing. They have a couple experts that can speculate and that's it. It is scary. And what's even scarier is all these people saying he's guilty when there has literally been zero evidence and the defense hasn't even put on their case yet.
Your lips to Gods ears ! 👣🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Agree, I don’t fully believe he is innocent but this trial hasn’t shown he’s guilty that’s for sure
Prosecution has nothing-gross miscarriage to ever bring this case to trial.
@@catherinejudd7993 I completely agree!
The defense lawyer is amazing, truly one of the best ive seen on these trials. Haters who say otherwise or the kind of people who wants everyone to be prosecuted whether they are innocent or guilty and doesnt want someone to get a fair trial
Yea they are doing a phenomenal job. Definitely a defense lawyer that's doing there best and not simply there for pay.
She is hands down solely why he beat this murder case. And imo she just got herself some well earned notoriety.
"Have you ever heard the expression garbage in, garbage out" 😵😵😄 Brilliant
Nothing but respect, a very impressive comb over.
How can someone do that and actually think they are successfully hiding their balding head?!?! 😂 Doing that just draws more attention to his balding head, it doesn't hide anything! 😳😂😂😂
This defence attorney is so prepared she doesn’t let anything go without clarification she is amazing.
Too chaotic. Jumps all over the place.
@@lojo420 Clearly you must be watching some other trial because the defense attorney is nothing but professional and thorough!! The prosecution could definitely stand to take a few lessons from her!!
I think it's a tactic to jump all over the place. This woman doesn't do anything without a reason
Good god!!! Law & crime! Get your camera guy to show the photos! The cord would’ve been interesting! Pathetic coverage 😡😡😡
many more sensitive photos are not allowed to be shown by the media. but yeah at times the crew messes up too. for example when they show the printed map instead of the map on the screen when someone draws lines on it on the screen. we just see the printed map....
Agreed!! Although they did show the cord, I think that we should be able to see all photos that was presented. Just because "we" are not physically sitting in the gallery, we should be able to see any and all of what the jury and gallery see!!!!
@@viqala9159 I can’t stand not being able to see what they’re pointing to or circling, shouldn’t have to guess. Makes me wonder if this is happening in the courtroom anywhere else. Not helpful at all!
Sometimes they are not allowed to show the photos. If they violate orders, we get no coverage.
The photos that cannot be shown are blurred out, but other photos for example when witnesses were circling on the map, we didn’t get to see all of that. Someone is not paying attention to what they are broadcasting. It is very annoying!
(Just 1 out of the 1001 questions without the answer) - how is it possible that her 2 toes were missing/broken/fallen `out of the shoe`` etc, if they found her with both of the shoes ON & firmly tied...!? @8:44:33 👟🤔
@@BlargBlather ...a few...!? I`m not sure what did they actually do right... 🙄
I think one toe was analyzed for DNA to identify her if I remember right.
I so wanted a jury question of Smock to be 'Can you empty out both shoes please' and have the toe fall out like the battery in Chicanery
@@annette8867 it was an extracted tooth I’m sure
@@mollycuddle9990 You're right one tooth was taken yes, but I could have sworn that they also mentioned they took a toe or another bone besides a tooth. Idk
41:30 It is always entertaining to me whenever a lawyer’s cross-examination begins with politely calling the witness a hack.
😂😂👌🏻
I can’t stand listening to the defense atty😳
Same! She's been hurting my ears...why so loud? 😅
So the jury dont fall asleep and a mistrial 😴
If you were on trial for a murder you didn’t commit you would absolutely want her as your defense attorney.
They have absolutely no evidence against him, nothing.
best. judge. ever.
Got to hand it to the defense attorney she blows a lot of smoke, but don't see much fire from either side yet.
She does her job very well. Extremely prepared attorney.
Her job right now is indeed to blow smoke - In order to make the prosecution case look more confusing. If their case was stronger, it wouldn't matter.
@@charlesleroq932 well that IS what I said... not convinced it makes the other side "weaker' as these cases are based on facts and like I said.. don't see much from solid facts right now as much as from inference of the facts. I personally have made no opinion re: either side. They are both weak to me right now, and way to early to make any kind of fair judgment.
Its up to the state to prove he's guilty, they brought the charges. The Defense dont have to prove hes innocent because he is until proven guilty.
One thing you never want to hear as a prosecutor.....when it comes to your expert's report.... the defense asks so it's "garbage in, garbage out" and the expert replies..... Yes, that's correct.
Wow, do all or most defence attorney's get to go to NASTY class before they pass the bar????
Very very small fragile bone…yep she said it…I love Diane such a great defender of they integrity of these over credentialed , charlatans. This case is disturbing on many levels. One 27 year veteran police man doesn’t know what objective means. Yikes
The prosecutors sure let her testify through statements between questions. She’s very clever
2:53:00. So the state asks the professor to confirm that the bone fractures in the face and hyoid bone are the result of traumatic event around the time of death... BUT MAKES NO QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER SUCH FRACTURES ARE CONSISTENT WITH AN ASSAULT OR ESTRANGULATION BY ANOTHER PERSON??? Just "No further questions". What kind of prosecution do we have here? This is absolutely ridiculous!!!
Nothing proves Moore did it, if in fact it was murder 🤷♀️
Other than the fracture s
Exactly
Please tell me he is NOT a doctor, shame on the prosecutors for even falling for this! OMG
I am watching this on Dateline right now. That Defense Atty was awesome. Whew....
So Smock is saying because the cord was only 1/8 inch around it couldn't do damage to different spots on her neck. What if she thrashing around and the cord moved? What if she climb on top of the branch and jumped?
Diane Menashe is great ! I use to be a paralegal and I’ve met a lot of Attorneys and she is by far one of the best I have seen. I’m impressed and would have loved to work for someone like her. Keep up the good work.
She sure is and she is doing an amzing job at casting doubt in the trial, The State is in a real struggle here.There expert can not determine cause of death is a big blow to there case.
Don’t see anything great.
@@LisatheGreatest What have you seen the State do ?
Not great She's all over the place. She was making a fool of herself trying to blow smoke up the jury by attempting to show she had more knowledge than forensic anthropologist. I'd hate to be her husband he must be a real trooper to put up with her and her antics.
@@chrispbacon4480 She made the Anthropologist look foolish and then moved on to the expert Doctor who looked lost in outer space.
Now there are other expert coming in who is not allowed to determine cause of death this case is a done deal and should have never been filed in the first place.
In my humble opinion, he is guilty but the state hasn't done their job by proving it 🤷🏻♀️
I agree with you 100% it’s sad for her that someone different isn’t up there fighting for her!! 🤦🏻♀️
Wondering how many times he has thought to himself....
I wouldn't be sitting here if I didn't volunteer for a police interview
Was she murdered YES... Did he do it??? Unfortunately there is no evidence that he did it. Doesn't mean a murder did not occur.... I think he ambushed her on her walk.
Though the defense lawyer seems to know her stuff, she gets overly dramatic, and seems more interested in making loud intimidating snide remarks than making her point in a normal tone of voice. One needn't be nasty to each witness on the stand.
I prefer the term 'passionate.' One can only hope they have a defense attorney as passionate as this woman when the evidence is dicey at best.
Because she knows what is being presented is rubbish. They have no evidence. They are putting on “experts” before the ME because they didn’t like that it was not considered a homicide.
As someone else on here said she is not nasty, just assertive and doing her job as she should. If I were in any trouble she would be the one I would pick to be on my side. She is excellent and wiping the floor with the prosecution. All three of them! She is driving a tank through all the holes in their flimsy case!
She's fighting for someone's life. When she thinks she's being played she's going to call them out.
@@sweetiepie49 She was co counsel for Dr. Hussel. Not Guilty what 29 times? She is a great lawyer...sometimes a lawyer has to be snide
The way this prosecutor say “State exhibit” 😂 stezibt
Defence hasn’t even started and I still have so much doubt I can only wonder why he is in trial. 5 days in!
His atty. is a bully!
Dr. Smock significantly undermined his own credibility by speaking in such absolutes.
And the RIDICULOUS combover.
@@MarmaladeSally the ridiculous hair does not affect his credibility. Actually is the opposite; Only a person full of knowledge would be asked to go to court even though looking like this.
He’s a liar. I reviewed the literature myself. See my research links above. One study showed that 50% of the incomplete hangings in the study sample had fractured hyoid bones.
@@Mom_Luvs_Tech I thought it was telling that he refined his testimony so much in attempts to soften the impact of the study the defense mentioned where 3 people over 50 yrs old had 4 fractures from a hanging and make it seem like the study shouldn't apply in this case bc it didn't consider weight.
And his testimony is all shtick.
Who is the man in the courtroom every day? Behind Matheau Moore. He listens intently and is there every day, all day. Anyone know?
I was wondering also. Maybe an uncle?
@@maevemaiden also a woman taking lots of notes around the same age.
I think his father or step father. The lady taking notes, I think Emily's sister.
I was thinking maybe his dad ?
@@curlycruise3809 She is not her sister.
I can't take anybody seriously with a comb over like that. It automatically invalidates anything you say because all I'm thinking of is what you look like when you wake up in the morning.
The problem I have, is if they can prove it was manual strangulation. Then how can they say who did it. Because there is no proof that it was Matt. Yes someone could believe that he could have done it but I consider that reasonable doubt.
She was murdered. But no evidence that he did it. So not guilty
Diane Menashe is a national treasure and should be protected! Love this woman. She owns the room. Mad respect.
I agree 109%.
She is an outstanding orator and illustrator. Her courtroom antics and experience leaves everyone drawn to her. Even the bailiff is left all ears and wide eyed!
Well said, better worded and less lengthy than my comment, 👍
She is truly spectacular at her job
@@Danymity1 I absolutely love watching her. & Completely captivated by her delivery. Gonna stop now! Clearly I’m a Diane Stan.
That combover is painful.
Agreed the jury ?'s have been excellent throughout, is there any information available regarding his sons hanging?
Matt should consider himself very lucky. He has an excellent team of attorneys!
He has money to get a great attorney im sure he’s happy
I just wish he had hired her sooner rather than later!
Are you joking?
@@beverlyflores Diane menashe has done a lot of pro bono work and it wouldn’t surprise me if this is one such case.
She is a bulldog! I love her.
The two men from out-of-town to whom Emily's husband, Matheau, gave $5,000 should have been subpoenaed for questioning by the prosecution.
one of them is on their witness list, but I'm not sure why. They already cleared them
They already cleared those people!!!
Why? They were both out of state at the time. And one is his half brother.
Yeah so a neighbor saw emily going on her daily morning walk. My guess is it was those 2 guys who waited for her in the bushes and ambushed her. She had a big inheritance that he prob offered them a cut of and gave them 5k as a first payment. And if he has telegram on his phone, none of the messages will ever be traced because it encrypts all messages.
@@julieo4580 I think those guys passed the money on to the real guys who did the crime. No one just gives someone 5k.
4 to 1. When they do sidebars, 3 or 4 of the state's attorney's show up. Only Diane shows up for the defense. I get the feeling the state is outclassed.
Defense attorney is condescending towards prosecutors witnesses on the stand it's going to backfire on her client 🙄
Juries absolutely love her. They interviewed jurors after the Husel trial.
@@IzzyMariel no way - she’s gross.
That’s kinda the point to discredit the witness. That’s what lawyers do every day in trial. Lol.
She’s doing her job. The job of the jury is to make decisions based on fact and logic not a popularity contest. Would you rather have her as your attorney if you did something you weren’t guilty of or one of these prosecutors? Personally I would want her 100%
Different jurors izzy
She is the best-dressed Attorney on the planet.
I did a ton of research today and fractures to the highway bone are seen in hanging suicides especially when the person is over the age of 40 and does an incomplete hanging.
Having a fractured hyoid bone is not proof of murder in any capacity.
When they’re under 100 pounds?
@@brady3126 Osteoporosis? she seemed as sturdy as a sparrow.
@@brady3126
*Reasonable Doubt*
Every witness* thus far has
Established RD
Ya...I don't like when Dr. Smock talked of this definitively like there's absolutely NO literature out there. You're free to give yr opinion but not deal out absolute facts. I understand he's an expert witness for the State. Also, @the little pod person , osteopenia is not the same as osteoporosis, the former doesn't have clinically observed symptoms but could be picked up from a special scan. There could also be a variety of factors for osteopenia as Menashe pointed out, like diet and genetics, but also, a female who has menopause could very well have that since there's a lack of estrogen in the body (could be early in her case). Whatever, we don't really know her medical hx. ALL of these however, does not make Smock a crime scene analysis expert.
@@haikubandit6997 Not EVERY witness.
Diane sure is a force to be reckoned with.
Guilty guilty guilty.
She got ambushed by a hitman!! It’s verified that she went on her morning walk. She even had her water bottle and vape pen. Matt hired a hitman. He also sent the 5k to 2 dudes. Matt didn’t do it but he paid someone too.
One was his half brother. One was a friend from Vegas if I remember correctly. Both were out of state at the time
Julie O is correct. Go back and watch yesterday & the day before. They discussed this in court already. There was no hitman or hitmen.
@@JudicialMermaid Besides which, if that were the case, surely the prosecution would have arrested the paid killers and offered a plea deal to finger their client. There would also be a trail of evidence if three people were involved.
@@JudicialMermaid time stamp for when they talk about it?
@@michaelblanco8099 it's during the cross of the detective on day 3
I bet Mat would like a few swigs of vodka and a Marlboro!
A hahahaha yes, I bet he loves his sober life in prison LOL
How can the broken ribs be explained? Does that not take allot of force to break?
she had ostopenia
I wonder if on day 4 when they talked about the extention cord being out instead of "in its place" implies it was almost used for the cord around her neck. By him or her, depending on who you believe.
I'm still baffled as to why they tried to use that as evidence
For someone that didn't know how to spell couch he sure is writing alot.
A lot. It’s probably his book. There might be a lot of misspelled words.
@@Mindhunter64 who's the Ghost that's going to write that book?
You have no idea what he’s writing. Maybe he’s writing to calm his nerves. I would be. Anything to calm down while I listen to the prosecution’s case when I’m innocent.
I thought the same thing.
@@julieo4580 why don't you go "Calm his nerves" hear he's free tonight Julie.
If he broke her nose shouldn't have been some blood on clothes, on the floor.
Again, she was not murdered in the house she was killed somewhere else
@@TheMiddleFan where's the evidence of that?
@1:56:42 "If I had a 25-page resume, I wouldn't have to kill my wife for the insurance."
Diane Menache seems to really enjoy cross examining experts.... she stands up down right giddy.
Dr. Smock seems to be in bed w the state on many trials and convictions. He and the prosecutors appear to have some sort of understanding.
I thought so too.
Defense atty, is an animal and does not allow the dr. To answer questions to completely.
The prosecution should object then.
Isn't a peer review when you review your peer? Not a teacher reviewing their student. I'm not in the academic world, but I think that's right...
It’s when you’re academic or scientific work is reviewed by other academics or scientists in an official capacity where assertions or scientific findings are challenged etc.not just the general public or a journalist critiquing..something like that anyway..
Yes and it’s 100% subjective!
Imagine Amber Heard having Diane Menashe and her team as attorney against Ben, Camille and Dennison ... I can only imagine LOL