CANON Is THIS Real?! It Can’t Be True…OR CAN IT???
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- This FIX is brought to you by Synology and their Network Attached Storage Solutions. They have everything from 1 bay up to full Rackstations like what we have here at the studio. To learn more, head on over to bit.ly/fronas2
FROPACK4 is HERE with 14 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.... (40% OFF)
This week we have stories about a new Tamron 28-300mm Full Frame lens for Sony E mount cameras. Canon filed some patents for what could be some really sweet zoom lens that I hope are true. And have you ever wondered what $5 MILLION or so worth of camera gear looks like? This is YOUR Photo News Fix.
Listen to RAWtalk, the FroKnowsPhoto Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts. Or head on over to froknowsphoto.c...
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 and RF Canon Lenses Canon.us/r5fro
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknows...
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #PhotoNewsFix
R3 and a R5 Mark II, 400mm 2.8, 100-300mm 2.8, 135mm F1.8, and 28-70 f2
Almost the same for me, but I'll go for the R1 when I have the chance
Dito here. I can only dream!!!
Yep switch that R3 to an R1 for me too. The R3 is nice but is hungry for more processing power. That coprocessor was the missing link which feeds all the other benefits. Focus down to smaller faces, faster, more decisive, action tracking. Translation modules in Lightroom when you want to keep the Canon magic but avoid those days when the file overloads cause lockups.
Last but not least the layered options AF-on button in the R1 offers more control where it is needed. Hopefully that includes a way to kill the frame flare just before the shutter goes off. Oh yeah, and the priceless half second before I complete the shutter when too many of my pictures get lost.
Now imagine carrying that for a whole day.
GL.
That’s insane
An RF 200-500mm f4 would be the dream wildlife lens for me. Chuck in the internal 1.4x extender that the EF 200-400mm f4 had, and that would be 👌🏼
You read my mind...
That would make it much bigger and heavier than a 600 prime
This is what I've been waiting for. I'll sell a kidney for it.
@@JojoJogetwith the weight reductions Canon made to the RF 400mm f2.8 and RF 600 f4, I’m sure they could make it at least equal to the EF 200-400mm f4.
It’s been rumored for years at this point, which feels like an overall accurate summary of Canon right now. The R5ii would be fantastic for wildlife with glass options, but we don’t have them. Some day, maybe, rumors say they’re working on it, just like the mythical do-it-all teleconverter, check back in a few years… That’s Canon.
100-300 f4 would be an awesome lens to pair with 24-105 f4!
f2.8 70-200 and a 1.4 extender.
@@WeeBurnip-lz3frnot compatible with the 70-200mm.
@@paul4424 it is with the EF.
@@WeeBurnip-lz3fr ef to rf + an extender + the lens is alot of components
@@WeeBurnip-lz3fr Dumb loss in focus control and/quality unless you buy and overpriced extender.
I really hope that 300-600 f2.8-4.5 makes it to market. IMO that's even better than the 200-500 F4 we've been waiting years for. Perfect wildlife lens
what's your guess on the price of it?
@@victorcsiszar considering the ef 200-400 f4 is a $11k lens, I wouldn't expect this to be anything less than $12k, maybe even a bit more since it's a zoom
6:20 L mount lenses fit on canon RF? LOL! someone missed that when it was edited.
woopsie, meant to say "L" lenses
Well it could be Jared is leaking Canon is joining the L mount alliance (alliance, alliance)...
@@troypast3589😂😂😂
*** oops missed the clarification
Cheers
Canon L lenses are a category of professional lenses, not a mount type. Canon has EF mount, M Mount and RF mount in their line, as well as the EF-S, and RF-S for APSC sensors.
L-mounts are produced by other companies.
@@SilenceNate bruhhhh, you fr tho? 😂
Jared for your next big give away - a 5 min grab what you can from that Olympic room? Hope Ken got a chance to be one of the 40 that got to use the R1. A flagship that only shoots Jpeg is about as close to his dream camera he will ever get.
@@troypast3589 Yeah Ken's review might be interesting. Honestly though, with the short amount of time they give these people it's got to be hard for them to give good review. Even with the short exposures, though, you do get a sense of the design direction Canon is going.
I’ll take an R5 mkII, R1, 15-35 f2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, and 600 f4 😍
Sadly, the optimal shoping list would be to pick the two most expensive bodies and the four most expensive lenses. Then, when you get home and decide you really don't need all of those insanely expensive and insanely big long lenses, sell them and get a nice 70-200 F2.8 and all the fixed focal length ones.
HA EXACTLY what I thought too !
Would hope Canon would release the RF 200-500 f4 replacement of the EF 200-400 f4 before starting rumors of even more lenses. But here we are in Q3 of 2024 without any recent rumors about the RF 200-500.
I’d love to see a 200-500 too but personally I think a large aperture 300-600 will be more useful for most sports and wildlife photographers who shoot in low light conditions.
Imagine how small a 50mm f2.8 prime vs a 24-70 f2.8 zoom then extrapolate it with a 600mm prime
If I had a shot at the canon gear room I’d be taking home the R1 and R5II, and the 400 f2.8, 600 f4, 100-300 2.8 and a 24-105 f2.8
Bodies - R5ii x2
Glass - 28-70 f2, 85 f1.2, 100-300 f2.8, 15-35 f2.8
Yes! This would be almost ideal.
X2
Absolutely
Then I would better buy a Can Am Spyder.
Same 😂
That’s store room sweep would be interesting 🥹 r5mkii r3 bodies. 100-300 f2.8, 600 f4, 15-35mm f2.8, then tied between either 50/85 f1.2
Sheesh 😂🔥
Canon needs a competitor for the 150-600 type of lenses. I switched from Nikon to canon and not having a lens that’s cheap and in that focal range sucks. Edit ; I’m aware of the 100-500 it is extremely more expensive than the competitors
they opened the lens mount so i imagine it won't take too long until those lenses will be produced for RF mount
Well I heard from others wanting the 200-800 for Z mount. In particular it is it but even longer (while getting slower but the length is desired by a lot I talked to when being out there taking pictures).
@@marijn17sthey opened the rf-s not rf
the best super tele photo lenses are in nikon brother...
An R5mii with a RF24-105f2.8, RF100-300f2.8, RF28-70f2 and RF135f1.8
That'd be very unwise, just go for all the big zooms which are worth in the +10,000 range. Just resell them afterwards if you don't need them. 🙂
Bodies - R1 and R5mkii
Glass - 28-70 f2, 85 f1.2, 100-300 f2.8, 15-35 f2.8
R3, R5mii, RF 28-70 f2, RF 85 1.2, RF 70-200 2.8, RF 400 2.8
Is this your line up?
R3 and R5 II camera bodies, if there was something like the Sigma 60-600 sport, that would be one. Then I'd take a wide prime, 16mm 1.8 or 1.4 if that's an option. Followed by the 28-70 f2, and the 400 2.8. The 100-300 would be another with extender 1.4. Thanks for all the tough love Jared!
NAS storage is very useful and important in my everyday usage.
If Canon makes a 100-300 f4.0 (and doesn't charge more than $2K for it) that would be one of the most popular lenses ever.
R1, R5mkii, 600 f4, 100-300 f2.8, 85 f1.2 and 15-35 f2.8…
just got the RF 24-105 f2.8 and loving it
Definitely grabbing an R5 mkII and gotta take the R1 for a spin if nothing else to see the comparison! I'm going for broke on the lenses, 400 2.8, 100-300 2.8, 85mm 1.2 and the 24-105 2.8
Hmm, i think I would go 2 R6 Mark II 1 RF 15-35 f2.8, 1 RF 24-70 F2.8, 1 RF 70-200 f2.8 and the rf 50mm f1.2
Would be a good kit for my video production and also for fotos and video on events 👍🏻
Of course r5 mark ii would be tempting but I am happy with two sd cards slots, the mix of different cards just doesn’t work for me. Happy weekend to everyone reading this.
I wouldn't even hesitate, I would grab 2 R5ii's An 85 1.2, 70-200 2.8, 28-70 f2 and the 100-500... For me that's the dream team. That setup would fill out my current collection of poverty spec Canon gear quite nicely. lol I'll be staring longingly at the Canon refurb page if anyone needs me.
I'd grab 2 R5, MkII's for sure. Any 4 lenses would be OK - they are all awesome!!
I’ll take one 100-300 and that’s it, here in Bulgaria it’s like 15000$ in the store…
We need wildlife that 200-500f4,and thats it..
R1 & R1 (I don't do much video these days) 24-70, 70-200, 85 1.2 & 400 2.8, Cover sports and weddings. As much as I'd LOVE to have the 100-300, I don't think it would be a good all arounder, tough to beat the 70-200 as an all around lens.
0:52 I'm guessing he didn't want to do a 10 minute lecture for an ad spot but technically having one RAID array still isn't total data security.
Secure data is backed up THREE times.
1. Local active storage (NAS).
2. Offline cold storage (cannot be hit with encryption hijacking).
3. Cloud storage/off site storage (in case your house burns down).
Plus remember that if your data isn't stored with the ZFS or BTRFS filesystem then your files are all still susceptible to bitrot (individual bits of data will randomly flip over time and corrupt files, every file needs to be re-written periodically or else it will just become corrupted unreadable data).
"Bitrot" Interesting! Never heard of that before. We've been using RAID + CD/DVD/HDD/SSD + Cloud (since it was available). I cringe at the thought of professional photographers not having at least three sources of backup. Don't learn the hard way!
@@Lensman64 czcams.com/video/l55GfAwa8RI/video.html
I'd pick the R8 and R5 MkII, RF 24-70 F2.8, RF 35 mm f1.4, RF 70-200 f2.8 and RF 400 f2.8
The R8 would complement my RF 24-105 f4 for light travel. I also own a 100-500 L, a Viltrox 85 mm f1.8 and very old 35 mm f2 which would be alltogether a wonderful setup.
That would be CRAZY if they made either of those two 600mm zooms. I'd be super in favor of a 300-600mm zoom. It would probably replace my 100-500. It will probably be unreasonably expensive though if you look at the 100-300mm lens price.
Sports shooter here so two R1 bodies, RF 400mm f/2.8, 100-300 f/2.8, RF 28-70 f/2, RF 15-35mm f/2.8 and the nonstop hope that I never have a need to cover 70 - 100mm and don't have room to zoom with my feet. I would be tempted to go with a 600mm f/4 instead of the 15-35mm though. Having 45 MP and less reach (eg: 300mm on an R5) yields far less image quality than 24 MP and sufficient reach (like across a baseball/softball diamond or from 50 yards away when shooting behind the endline in football or soccer).
I (would) use two Canon R3 (R1 when available) [using identical cameras makes handling & settings so much easier], a 15-35/2.8, 28-70/2.0 (for portraits), 70-200/2.8, 200-400/4+ext (maybe a 100-300/2.8, with 1.4 & 2.0 extenders - haven't tried that as an alternative to the 200-400/4+ext).
R3 and R5 Mark II, 600mm F4, 1200mm, 28-70 F2, 100-300 F2.8. 1200mm in YNP would be amazing. Tripod/gimble setup would work great!
I would take 2 R5 ii, rf lenses 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, 1200 L. All with 2.8 or lower aperture.
C R5M2 and C R3 and C70-200f2.8,C24-70f2.8,C400f2.8,C85f1.2 nice shopping :D
I sure hope those shelves are secure with no building shakes in the offing.... especially the shelf unit with the tele's perched precariously on the top shelf.
If I've only got them for one day, and it had to be at the Olympics - and (please) not at the Paris Olympics - I would take the following: two R1 bodies for the power, speed, ISO and extra sale-able shots. A trombone style 70-200 f2.8L for the quick intuitive interface, a 100-300 2.8, a 24-70 f2.8 and a 400mm with 1.4x extender. Plus a couple of roller bags to pack for big and small venues.
Wow, making a choice there would be very tough! As a body one R5 MkII for sure. But second Body? Either R1 or R6 MkII. An R6 MkIII with Features from the R5 MkII would be cool! Or a second R5 MkII.
As Lenses maybe 24 - 105 2.8, 100 - 300 2.8, 600 4 and then maybe 15 - 35 2.8 or some prime ? Don't know!
Thanks
Have you seen the British tennis player shouting at the photographer in the olympics 😂😂
The tamron 28-300mm reminded me of a great all around lens I had with the same specs but for EF mounts. I also understand Canon hasn't permitted Tamron to do any RF lenses so far, which is sad. I know they can do the crop sensor flavor.
id be taking the R1,R5 and the long primes for sure like most people id say , the best of the best with honor's sir !
i'd take the R3 and R5 MK2, will also take 24-70, 70-200, 100-300, and a 135mm 1.8
R1 & R5 MkII with a 600 f/4 and 400 2.8 that would fill out my gear quite well along with a 24-70 F/2.8 and the 10-20 f/4
Very funny and efficient video !
I would take 1 R5 mk II and 1 R6 Mk II.
Lenses would be 16-35 ; 24-104 2.8 ; 70-200 2.8 ; 300 2.8
6:20 Did you say the amount of L-mount lenses is absolutely staggering? You referring to the alliance or luxury?
I don't see Canon bringing either lens out based on rumored specs. A 400-600 would probably be deemed too narrow a range so I consider the 300 to 600 more likely, but as a variable f4-5.6/6.3 to keep the size managable. Considering the price of their 100-500, I would be surprised if such a prosumer lens would retail for less than 6k USD. If it does show up as a f2.8-4.5, expect it to be 1.5x as big and expensive as an f4-5.6 version (although I would almost argue it would be worth it!).
R1 and a R5 Mark II, 400mm 2.8, 100-300mm 2.8, 135mm F1.8, and 28-70 f2. Just let me know when to pack my bags and where to go. Thanks!
I would take the 2 of the Canon R5 II's because I would like to keep consistency in my workload. As for lenses, I have been trying to save up for the 70-200 2.8 so that would be a must have. I would go with a 28-70 2.0, a 100-300 2.8 and a 10-20 f4. I have been trying to save up to go from my ef kit to a rf kit but they are so expensive and the kids take priority. Thanks for sharing the video!
Nikon Z8 and D850, 120-300 2.8, 70-200 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 14-24 2.8. Can always add a 1.4 Extender to get that 420mm 4.0 reach on the 120-300. Yes, Nikon is my preferred choice
R5II, R1, 28-70 F2, 1200mm F8 (just to show we can photo the MOOOOONNNN), 100 macro and 15-35
Hmm…good question. I have an old R6 with, for me, too less MP. I would like to take one R5 Mark II and maybe one R6 Mark II for a backup. On the Lens side I would like the RF 10-20 F4L, RF 85 F1.2L DS, RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 and a RF 100-300mm F2.8L. These lenses would be nice to test.
Supermarket sweep would be R7, R5 mk2, 24-70, 70-200, 600 prime and 800 prime. That would cover wildlife and vehicle photography perfectly for me. And then I wake up and realise I was just dreaming 😂
Tamron has also a 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD lens for APS-C cameras, so with even more reach ...
I’d take: 2 R5 mark II’s, a 135 1.8, 100-300 f/2.8, 10-20 f/4, and 50 1.2!
R1 and a R5 mk ||. Since I have a 24-105mm f2.8L and a 70-200mm f2.8L, I’d take an 85mm f1.2L, 100-300mm f2.8L, 400mm f2.8L, and 28-70mm f2.0.
I would definitely walk out with the R5 II and the R7, lenses would be 600 f4, 500 f4, 100-500 4.5-7.1 and 200-800.
I’m taking the big hams, frozen turkeys & inflatable cola for those sweet extra points.
Nikon shooter here. Assuming the "Supermarket Sweep" question applied here as well and I could add any two bodies and 4 lenses to my stash... Z6III, Z8, 14-24 f/2.8 S, 135 f/1.8 Plena, 400 f/4.5, 600 f/4 TC. Hell, I'd be ecstatic just adding one of those items. A faster 35mm lens that isn't the new shitty f/1.4 non-S would be fantastic, too.
For a better 35 f1.4 than any CaNikon there’s the Voigtlander 35f1.5 or APO 35 or any of the Leica Sumiluxes- they can be easily adapted with AF adapters on the Z full frame cameras.
The difference in image quality is astounding.
Ok, I’m really digging that shirt design
Bodies: R3 and R5 MK II. Lens: 100-300mm f2.8 and 24-70mm f2.0.
Easy. R3 and R5II, 10-20 F/4 and 24-105 F/2.8 on the zoom side, 35 F/1.4 and 135 F/1.8 on primes.
From those shelves and that situation it would have to be the R1 and the R5 II (as I already have the R3), plus the 600 F4L (I have a 2x so no need for the 1200 F8L), 400 F2.8L, 100-300 F2.8L and 24-105 2.8L. I think that covers me for most things 😁
Oooh for my bodies I would take two identical units, so it would be either R5 or R5 mk II, maaaaybe I could do the R3 or R1 instead, but I would personally want the pixel count on the R5 versions... For the lenses I would go with 28-70 mm f/2.0, 400 mm f/2.8, 600 mm f/4 and an ultrawide zoom lens.
Jared you looking 👀 fresh n clean with that shirt and a lil bling👊🏾
I'd do an R5 and an R6. I'd want a 35 1.4, 24-105 F2 (or 2.8, can't remember), 70-200 2.8, and some sort of wide angle.
I shoot Nikon, but that would be sweet to choose from any camera+lens combo, regardless if it's another manufacturer.
I enjoy the f/4 zoom lenses (14-35mm and 24-105mm in RF, and EF 70-200mm mkII), as most of the time I’ll be carrying them around.
I certainly miss in the longest reach lenses, so the RF 600mm would be a dream (to carry around too).
The 35mm f/1.4 is a great new entry, so it’s in too.
And for special occasions, the 24-70mm f/2.8.
I have worked the upper body a little (hello EF 100-400mm L), nowhere near Jared’s level of course, but that’s one reason I’d avoid the f/1.2 big ones, primes and zoom.
I would then pick one R5 mkII, but in the real world, I plan to go for the original R5 next time there is a sale. To me it’s enough of a photographer’s camera.
The other camera would be the R3, smaller than the R1.
I’ll admit I may be a little too pragmatic, but imagining going out with this dream pick better fits my experience.
One more lens pick? So I will go against what I said earlier, and grab an 85mm f/1.2 DS. Might as well.
I shoot RAW (or cRAW…).
Keep up the good work, Jared!
i would take R1 to go with my R3 and a r5 mII plus a 100-300 2.8 and 35mm f1.4, and of course the beautiful 85mm F1.2 DS (really waiting for more lense to get the DS treatment.)
R1 and R5 Mark II, 400mm 2.8, 100-300mm 2.8, 135mm F1.8, and 28-70 f2
R1 / R5 Mk2 with RF 600 f/4 , RF 24-105 f/2.8, RF 800mm F11 , RF 100-500 .
A 400-600 f2.8-4.0 seems like an attempt to replace both a 400mm f2.8 and a 600mm F4. That would be an amazing lens, but I can't grasp how it could be cheaper or smaller or lighter than a 400mm f2.8.
I would get the following gear.
- 2x R5ii body
- RF 400mm F2.8 (i have a slow old heavy EF version)
- RF 15-35 F2.8 (still missing)
- RF 100mm F2.8 macro
- RF 85mm F1.2
I know jarred is a great guy so he will get this gear for me 😇
a single alone NAS is not a backup either. You need 3,2,1 setup. Good news for your sponsor thought two out of my three backups are on their NAS boxes in different locations synced over the cloud.
Backup is extremely important. I have hard drive backup of all my work in my mother's house and I upload my files there using the internet. If my house were to be destroyed by fire, typhoon, earthquake,or the Chinese military, I still have a backup if I am still alive.
My camera of choice will R5 ii and R1 with 24-105mm f2.8 16-35mm 70-200mm then 100-300mm but the sad thing is in Africa these gears are expensive to buy because especially in Ghana 🇬🇭. It will be a dream come true because am currently using 5D Mrk 3 and looking forward to upgrade.
I think one lens for vacation would be fine. I find because I don’t want to bring a bunch of gear on vacation so I tend to leave my camera home and use my phone. But with a lens like this I would be more inclined to tent my camera.
R5ii and an R3, 400 2.8, 600 4, 100-500, and 24-70 would be my picks for new gear, but if I were trying to extract funds, I’d get 2 R5ii and 4 600 F4s and sell everything except one R5ii
R5 mark ii, R7, RF 600 F4, RF 200-800, 10-20 F4, 28-70 F2
A R5 mark 2 for me and a R5 mark 2 for my friend. The four lenses i'd choose is a f 1.4 50mm, f 2.8 24-105mmm, 70-200mm and 1.4 85mm.
We need more lenses like the RF 24-105 f2.8 lens :D
I would grab the R3 and R5II lenses w be the 800, 600, 100-300 and 135
Bodies - r5ii and r1
Glass - 15-35 f/2.8, 28-70 f/2, 70-200 f/2.8, and 400 f/2.8
R1, R5MK II, 800 5.6, 100-300 2.8. and 28-70 2.0 or 24-105 2.8.
R3 and a R5 Mark II, 28-70 f2 100-300mm f2.8, 135mm f1.8 and a 85 f1.2
100-300 f4 ? Sigma had that years ago. I used that plus a Sigma 500 f4.5 for a number of years. A great combination for the price.
R1, R5mkii, 600mm f4, 1200mm f8, 100-300mm f2.8, 135mm 1.8, I got all the rest!
Canon paradise, Would be pretty sweet to get an R3, and a R5 mkii, with a 100-300mm f2.8, 70-200mm f2.8 and a 400mm f2.8 and 24-70mm f2
Canon dx M2/3 and a 70-200. Or one of their mirrorless options, but I don’t know much about their lineup
R3 and R5 Mark II,15-35mm 2.8, 85mm 1.2, 28-70mm 2.0, 70-200mm 2.8
@6:22 - “The amount of “L Mount” lenses present”…?!?😮😂😂. I will definately have in my trolly a R1 a R5ii as bodies, 15-30f2,8 / 24-105f2,8 / 100-300f2,8 and the 400f2,8 and shoot the best of the best photos ever with honors sir!! 😊
Having a very small budget, I’ve been using the EOS R with the 70-200 f2.8 and the RF 50mm 1.8. I do want more of a reach so for me, any 600 down to the 35mm or the 16-24mm would make my total lens package. But I just had my power converter break and it’s at Canon Service and they want 400 to fix it. I can’t afford that. So I’ll be selling all my gear and going to my dumb camera phone. Very sad week for me.
2 R5 Mark II bodies 600mm F4, 50 f1.2, 70-200 F2.8, 35 f1.2
Bodies - R5ii x2
LENS: RF24-105mm f/2.8L IS USM Z, RF100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM, RF15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM, RF200-800mm f/6.3-9 IS USM? (But I prefer a 150-600mm)
R5m2, 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, 100-400. Without hesitation.
2x R5II + 10-20mm f4, 24-70mm f2.8, 100-300mm f2.8 and 600mm f4!
If i can take it for free, then R1, R5 Mark II, RF24-105mm f/2.8L IS USM Z, RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM, RF85mm f/1.2L USM, and RF 35mm F1.4L VCM.
Go to the Nikon Room and take a Z8 and Z6III. with the 600 TC lens, the 400 TC lens. an a 50 mm 1.x prime.
My kit for the olympics would be R1 and R62 with RF 10-20f4, 24-105 f2.8 , 135 f1.8 and 100-300 f2.8
The 100-300 f/2.8 is on my wishlist for anyone that wants to gift it to me. Oh and the R5 II would be nice. I’m not greedy. Just those two.
R1, R5 II, RF 100-300 f2.8, RF 400 f2.8, Rf 10-20 f4, RF 70-200 f2.8
For the shopping, do you have a Nikon isle? 😂😂😂