Ustadh Nouman Ali Khan explains why he follows a specific Madhab and why it is the best one out of the four. FULL EPISODE LINKED HERE • The importance of Qura...
I just found this channel. The name is fantastic for a Muslim podcast. May Allah put barakah in it. I look forward to seeing this full interview Insha’Allah.
As a Syafi'i my self, I admire Imam Abu Hanifah the most I read his biography more than any Imams, including Imam Syafi'i 😄 Imam Nu'man is called "The Imam of imams" for many reason His geniuses is unmatched. How he simplify such complex problem, I can't find it in Syafi'i method. He translated Qur'an & Hadist into strong logical explanation, wich became strong foundation and pillars to nowadays aqidah & fiqh. Even my teacher himself said, if you want to debate or covert someone non-muslim into muslim I should learn from Hanafi. Their thinking method and mindset is out of our league One day I pray du'a to Allah, I want to meet him so much At least once in my dream 😄
@@user-xe1rd5qd4qhe was a Muslim, greater than any Muslim alive today. His followers today might be Shia but that shouldn't discredit him. It's like saying, "Jesus, he was a Christian wasn't he?". All 4 Sunni madhabs were either directly or indirectly influenced by Jafar al-Sadiq. In fact, he was a teacher of both Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn Anas.
@@user-xe1rd5qd4qhe was a Shia politically but not theologically like twelvers today. He wasn’t claiming to be part of a 12 imam lineage or being infallible. He was a great Islamic scholar.
Brothers, before you release the podcast, could you please fix the the guest's mic? It is considerably lower than the hosts' mic. You have to really increase the volume all the way to listen to Ustad Nauman, then there's a loud laughter. Makes for a very uncomfortable listening.
@@LJ-jd5yy The actual Imams of the salaf, I agree were in a position to critique his work, however these modern day "salafis" should stay in there lane.
Yeah they outright just cast him out of the status as a leading scholar of Islam and thats false. His work definitely has holes in it but there's also a lot of stuff he got right as well.
@@LJ-jd5yy”weak in hadith” implies he was deficient in an objective pillar of knowledge. it assumes Abu Hanifah agreed that hadith and sunnah are synonymous, and he just happened to be deficient in his knowledge of the sunnah because he didn’t travel or something. perhaps he didn’t agree that hadith were as valuable? maybe he devalued ahad hadith, especially if they contradict quran, and favored other sources of sunnah, like the practices of people in a particular city. the idea that hadith and sunnah are synonymous is an assumption and an opinion.
@@wokemorty727 not really, when imams from the actual muhaddithin say someone is weak in Hadith, it means very specific things, not what you assume it means. Fanatics of the hanafi madhab take it as an insult when in reality it isn’t, it’s just a fact they are stating based on criteria of what makes a person strong it Hadith.
Abu Hanifah was intelligent enough to say, "IF YOU FIND A SAHEEH HADITH, THAT HADITH IS MY MADHAB". If you want to follow this genius great imam, follow him correctly. May Allah increase us all in knowledge.
If you follow traditional orthodox sunni Islam, you don't need to rediscover the great Imam Abu Hanafi, you would be following his madhab, or the madhab of the other 3 great imams.
What NAK is saying in coded language is that he likes how Abu Hanifa would reject hadith if they contradicted Quran. And how Imam Malik would reject hadith if they contradicted the practice of the Madinans. But I think he is not outright saying it because he fears backlash from the Muslim community. Notice how he didnt say he likes the hanafi madhab, rather, the "early" (not later or established i.e. what is considered normal) hanafi madhab, and even in particular Abu Hanifah - not his madhab, which today is mostly formed by his students and later scholars. in fact, NAK even says Abu Hanifa is lied about by everybody including his own madhab. He should have just said it confidently than in this coded way to avoid backlash. what's the benefit for the audience of saying it half and leaving it half? now all these people in the comments think he means the hanafi madhab is the best which he definitely did not say.
this comment shows you are not a serious student and reveals more still - that you do not know what you are talking about. study brother. learn properly. @@self-help3796
He says every one lied which include hanafis aswell which means the guy was fallable like most of us but intellegent aswell as humble in front of quran and hadith
Most scholars of hadith classified Imam Abu Hanifa, as weak in Hadith’s narration including Imam Muslim and Ibn Al Mubark. Fiqh issues distracted him from dedicating hadith. This fact won’t degrade his high status in Islam. There are well-known and famous hadith narrators who have a higher status than Imam Abu Hanifa, and still classified as weak.
you can learn his short biography from Abdal Hakim Murad (also all four imams), and from Asrar Rashid. The videos are on youtube. And you can learn hanafi fiqh from Seeker's guidance channel.
He was criticized just like any other scholar. No one is free of mistakes, those scholars who criticized him still had respect for him. But errors are errors
If abu hanifa is misrepresented about everyone then how do you find out the real abu hanifa after 1300 years..... This is same as Christians saying that this is the real bible and all ghe stories of inqitah or broken chains are just stories....
and why are the two interviewers laughing like immature fools, rather than understanding what this Ustadh is actually trying to say? Anyhow Nauman Ali Khan should be choosy in whom to give interviews and podcasts.
They simply showing how stupid they really are. They lack finesse and if you don't know what to ask or say, giggle galore and hoot with laughter it covers the lack of intelligence. Allah guide them
I appreciate the feedback. I'll try not to be an "immature fool" next time I interview someone. Within the wider context of the previous discussions, it was a light hearted moment. We weren't there to speak about madhahib as it wasn't the focus of the interview. And Ustadh interviewed with us because I'm a student of his and on his research team. So the choice he made was with that in mind. God bless you and as-Salaam Alaykum
its Anafs in subcontinent who miss represented imam Abu hanfia RA with their self created stories and they do that because doing Taqleed itself make blind
no doubt he should be respected, and he is, however hanafi has deobandi and barali sub divisions, the latter seemingly similar to ahmadia muslims because they wanted to push back on the strict deobandi sect.
I'd say Deobandis are closer to Ahmadia as they deny the finality of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) in the sense that they say that Allah can send more prophets after him but it doesn't diminish his status as the Final Messenger which common sense dictates it does, because the the Prophet Muhammad isn't the final Prophet anymore
Also don't consider them Hanafi subdivisions, but rather separate groups that happen to be Hanafi. It a sudden Shafi'i group came and started saying Allah is 4, you wouldn't call them a subdivision of Shafi'is, but a separate group.
He didnt say he believes in Madhabs he said he thinks an Imam and another are awesome, Madhabs are one lf the Bid'as and Lies he spoke about because people tend to glorifie and worship the knowledge of someone and leave the Divine Scripture behind, and he spoke about how tremendous shocking act is that in the full podcast so dont spread lies, specially not lies he said people are lying about Imam's, no Imam said follow me i have a Madhabs, every Imam of the Real Imams was a student of knowledge and shared knowledge and thought it, but Madhabs thing is a human invention that has nothing to do with The Religion which is purely descended by Allah Subhanah and whomever follows that as a New part of religion is associating human with Allah, Allah said ask the people of experience if you dont know but never said that a humain can add something to the religion, he Said "Do You Think you're gonna Teach Allah you're religion??" As Mr. Nouman Explained you think you know more than Allah to add something to the religion wich He didn't put in it? Thats shameful to spread lies about the religion of Allah and the message of Nouman, and there's no bigger injustice than spreading lies about the religion of Allah.
@@robin1063 He's the teacher to Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn Anas ... Abu Hanifa even said "لولا السنتان لهلك النعمان" ... which means "if were for those two years, I would perish." Abu Hanifa meant, those two years that he acquired knowledge from Imam Ja'far Al-Sadiq (AS) .. But of course they learned from him and made changes and switched things up .. I'd highly recommend you research about Imam J'afar Al-Sadiq (AS) and the real Imams who are the sons of the prophet (S.A.W.A) ... J'afar Al-Sadiq (AS) was the 6th Imam from the prophet's progeny btw.
@@TheTruthWithAli Thanks for the reply. Just because he was their teacher doesn't mean I have to follow him. Being someone's teacher doesn't make them better at their craft. From your logic, Einstein's teacher was better than Einstein?
@@robin1063 I understand but you didn't get the point carefully, not only their teacher .. but Abu Hanifa declared that if he didn't learn from him he would perish :) .. also he's from the prophet's progeny and his fiqh quotes the prophet directly (the prophet (S.A.W.A.) is his grandfather) .. so it's not only him being their teacher .. so your Einstein comparison is kinda silly with all due respect .. You'd find the changes in Abu Hanifa's teaching was due to authority at the time ... compare it with the pure teachings of Ja'far al-Sadiq (AS) and how the authority killed him at the time .. just how they killed all the Imams from the prophet's progeny .. instead of taking my limited youtube comment as a full argument you can research more about him and why he's more of an authority for Islamic fiqh.
Such a dumb statement, back then most of knowledge was oral and not written down. Years after years the scholars wrote the knowledge. With your statemant you cant follow any scholar
There is no jaafari madhab but u mean hanafi because Abu hanifa was a student of jafar and jafar was the student of Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr alsiddiq
@@Iamfsaly Jaafari mazhab is the shia one, named after Imam Jaafar As-Sadeq a teacher of abu hanifa and malek, Imam As-Sadeq was taught by his father Imam Al-Baqer who was taught by his father Imam As-Sajjad who was taught by Imam Al-Husayn who was taught by his brother Imam Al-Hasan and his father Imam Ali who was taught by his father in law and cousin the prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon him and his family, his wasn't taught by Qasim
@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 The Shia do not possess a book by Imam Jaafar on jurisprudence nor on hadith that he composed or wrote with his own hand, or compiled for him by his close disciples, to which we can return with certainty that it was issued by him. In contrast to the imams of the four schools of thought and others, each of them has left us a written book on jurisprudence and hadith: Imam Abu Hanifa AlNuman bin Thabit (may God have mercy on him) left us his “Musnad” in the hadith. As for his jurisprudence, his direct students, such as Judge Abu Yusuf and Muhammad bin Al-Hasan Al-Shaybani, undertook to write it down and transmit it. Imam Malik bin Anas (may God have mercy on him) left us his manuscript (Al-Muwatta) in jurisprudence and hadith. Imam Al-Shafi’i (may God have mercy on him) left us the “Musnad” in hadith, and the book “The Mother” in jurisprudence. He is the founder of the science of “Usul al-Fiqh” in his book “The Message,” which is the first book in Islam written in its chapter. As for Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal Al-Shaybani (may God have mercy on him), his “Musnad” in the hadith is more famous than fire in knowledge! As for his jurisprudence, it is preserved and recorded. It is the most famous His students who wrote down the jurisprudence of Imam al-Khalal (may God have mercy on him) Even Imam Zaid bin Ali (may God have mercy on him) has a written jurisprudence, and a book of musnads on hadith. Except Jaafar bin Muhammad Al-Sadiq! We did not find any book of hadith by him, nor a book of jurisprudence written by him or compiled by his students. They have no basis for what they issue fatwas about him except narrations, which they cannot be certain about the accuracy of their attribution to him. Rather, they declare their objection to them, and their doubts about their attribution! The narrations attributed to him appeared a long time after his death! The oldest book of narration on the jurisprudential chapters approved by the Imamis that is available to us is the book “Furu’ al-Kafi” by Al-Kulayni, who died in the year 329 hijri. That is, 180 years after the death of Imam Jaafar al-Sadiq! Then came after him Muhammad bin Ali bin Babawayh Al-Qummi, who died in the year (381 Hijri), in his book (A jurist from whom the jurist does not attend). That is, more than 230 years after Jaafar
@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 The Shia authentic books claim to be “AUTHENTIC ISLAMIC SOURCES” but in reality they attack the authenticity of the Quran in many sources and they attack Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) I can give you all the sources but it’s in a Arabic
NAK has been wearing Fancy Hats, normal hats, white caps, different types of caps, Thobes, shirts, tshirts, kurta pajamas, and all kinds of clothes that a normal human wears for years. Maybe you are seeing it for the first time.
@@justhydr What is your point little boy. Tell me, what is your point? He changed a while ago? He doesn't change? He does not fashion? He is outside time? What is your point?
@@user-yc9xt8ed6u Dear Kiddo, My point is as clear as my answer to your main comment. May Allah give you and all of us good hidayah and understanding of deen.
@@youssefamr8073 imam at tahawi ra was a shaafi’i who later became a hanafi. Imam Malik ra is from the salaaf. Imam bukhari ra has “golden chain” that includes imam Malik ra. This idea that following the salaf is possible without a sanad is nonsensical. If you would like me to elucidate this please push back on how i started this reply. But first make it make sense that following the salaf doesn’t include the actual salaf who codified the fiqh and also clearly elucidated our aqidah
Full Episode linked here! czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
thank you for finally recognizing what half the ummah has been saying for generations.
Finally??? He has been following Hanafi since his early days of Islam
May Allah Ta'ala bless Imam Abu Hanifa. رحمة الله عليه
I just found this channel. The name is fantastic for a Muslim podcast. May Allah put barakah in it. I look forward to seeing this full interview Insha’Allah.
Finally we know his madhhab
I’ve learned all I need to know from this clip…no need for full episode!
Love for u brother... Indeed.. Woe to all who criticise abu hanifa Rahimullah
As a Syafi'i my self, I admire Imam Abu Hanifah the most
I read his biography more than any Imams, including Imam Syafi'i 😄
Imam Nu'man is called "The Imam of imams" for many reason
His geniuses is unmatched. How he simplify such complex problem, I can't find it in Syafi'i method.
He translated Qur'an & Hadist into strong logical explanation, wich became strong foundation and pillars to nowadays aqidah & fiqh.
Even my teacher himself said, if you want to debate or covert someone non-muslim into muslim I should learn from Hanafi.
Their thinking method and mindset is out of our league
One day I pray du'a to Allah, I want to meet him so much
At least once in my dream
😄
Unfortunately, most Hanafis don’t follow the Aqeedah of Imam Abu Hanifa (RA) or any of the 4 imams for that matter
@@yourfriends Owh really? I don't know that
Full video link please
I discovered Imam’s Jaafar al-Saddiq …and his work’s perspectives & knowledge just blew me away…
He is a Shia, is’t he? In those podcast they discussing sunni imams
@@user-xe1rd5qd4qhe was a Muslim, greater than any Muslim alive today. His followers today might be Shia but that shouldn't discredit him. It's like saying, "Jesus, he was a Christian wasn't he?". All 4 Sunni madhabs were either directly or indirectly influenced by Jafar al-Sadiq. In fact, he was a teacher of both Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn Anas.
@@HH_1988Shias dont follow him...They follow their fake Imams and Fake books
@@user-xe1rd5qd4qhe was a Shia politically but not theologically like twelvers today. He wasn’t claiming to be part of a 12 imam lineage or being infallible. He was a great Islamic scholar.
Upload full video plss
The two hosts seem to chuckle and giggle over everything. A bit annoying.
Full video link?
Brothers, before you release the podcast, could you please fix the the guest's mic? It is considerably lower than the hosts' mic. You have to really increase the volume all the way to listen to Ustad Nauman, then there's a loud laughter. Makes for a very uncomfortable listening.
JazakAllahukhair for the feedback!
Where is the full video? Pls give the link
where is the full episode???
Where to find this full video
Where is the full episode??
+++++
czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
He's talking about the modern day "salafis" who claim Abu Hanifa was weak in hadith but they don't know him or his works.
There are imams of the salaf who critiqued him for being weak in hadith, its not a “salafi” phenomenon
@@LJ-jd5yy The actual Imams of the salaf, I agree were in a position to critique his work, however these modern day "salafis" should stay in there lane.
Yeah they outright just cast him out of the status as a leading scholar of Islam and thats false. His work definitely has holes in it but there's also a lot of stuff he got right as well.
@@LJ-jd5yy”weak in hadith” implies he was deficient in an objective pillar of knowledge. it assumes Abu Hanifah agreed that hadith and sunnah are synonymous, and he just happened to be deficient in his knowledge of the sunnah because he didn’t travel or something. perhaps he didn’t agree that hadith were as valuable? maybe he devalued ahad hadith, especially if they contradict quran, and favored other sources of sunnah, like the practices of people in a particular city. the idea that hadith and sunnah are synonymous is an assumption and an opinion.
@@wokemorty727 not really, when imams from the actual muhaddithin say someone is weak in Hadith, it means very specific things, not what you assume it means. Fanatics of the hanafi madhab take it as an insult when in reality it isn’t, it’s just a fact they are stating based on criteria of what makes a person strong it Hadith.
Where the whole video????
Abu Hanifah was intelligent enough to say, "IF YOU FIND A SAHEEH HADITH, THAT HADITH IS MY MADHAB". If you want to follow this genius great imam, follow him correctly. May Allah increase us all in knowledge.
abu hanifah never said that
@@louisdeniau8571 Sheikh Al Albani proved this in his book called "The Prophet's Prayer Described"
If you follow traditional orthodox sunni Islam, you don't need to rediscover the great Imam Abu Hanafi, you would be following his madhab, or the madhab of the other 3 great imams.
Full video?
Full episode?
Both Imam Abu Hanifah and NAK share the same name
I guess this Guys won't be uploading the full episode.
Editing takes time.
czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
Where is the full Podcast???????????????????????????????????????????????????
czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
@@propheticmentality6274 Jazakallahu Khairan!!
BRO UPLOAD FULL VIDEO ALREADY!
czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
@@propheticmentality6274 jazakallah khairan!
What NAK is saying in coded language is that he likes how Abu Hanifa would reject hadith if they contradicted Quran. And how Imam Malik would reject hadith if they contradicted the practice of the Madinans. But I think he is not outright saying it because he fears backlash from the Muslim community. Notice how he didnt say he likes the hanafi madhab, rather, the "early" (not later or established i.e. what is considered normal) hanafi madhab, and even in particular Abu Hanifah - not his madhab, which today is mostly formed by his students and later scholars. in fact, NAK even says Abu Hanifa is lied about by everybody including his own madhab. He should have just said it confidently than in this coded way to avoid backlash. what's the benefit for the audience of saying it half and leaving it half? now all these people in the comments think he means the hanafi madhab is the best which he definitely did not say.
You can't make statements before hearing the full podcast. Wait for the full podcast.
I consider myself an early Hanafi as well. The 3 eponyms aka Numan, Yusuf and Shaybani.
this comment shows you are not a serious student and reveals more still - that you do not know what you are talking about. study brother. learn properly. @@self-help3796
A very strange take you got there. He is literally talking about a group of people who doubt his scholarship.
substantiate your absurd claim@@ziokeye2679
Where is the full video??
czcams.com/video/JNsVumzKhH4/video.html
He says every one lied which include hanafis aswell which means the guy was fallable like most of us but intellegent aswell as humble in front of quran and hadith
How is he the grandfather of 'all things' fiqh when there were *way* bigger fuqahaa' before him?
Can you please name one faqeeh who was before him?
Organized fiqh*
Damn, Nouman Khan speaking good about Abu Hanifa? Something fishy going on. What is his plan i wonder
Nothing fishy. He has respected and followed the teachings of 4 Imams all his life.
Most scholars of hadith classified Imam Abu Hanifa, as weak in Hadith’s narration including Imam Muslim and Ibn Al Mubark. Fiqh issues distracted him from dedicating hadith. This fact won’t degrade his high status in Islam. There are well-known and famous hadith narrators who have a higher status than Imam Abu Hanifa, and still classified as weak.
What are the resources to learn about Abu Hanifa?
you can learn his short biography from Abdal Hakim Murad (also all four imams), and from Asrar Rashid. The videos are on youtube. And you can learn hanafi fiqh from Seeker's guidance channel.
I think you should read books
The four imams by shaykh Mohammad Abu Zahra
And Abu hanifa by alama shibli nomani
Both available in English.
Jazakallah
Read Nur al Idah for intermediate hanafi fiqh
@@asifrana232those two are hard core sufis
If you understand Arabic you can find lectures about Abu hanifa by sheikh said Al Kamali
Please upload the full video
Check the description!
Really is it need to follow any madhab?Maybe Noman ali does not talk about madhab before
Bruh, you met with the prophet directly?
@@lindakusuma6671did the prophet say you have to take a madhab ????
Abu henifa didn’t even meet the prophet or his companions
He was criticized just like any other scholar. No one is free of mistakes, those scholars who criticized him still had respect for him. But errors are errors
If abu hanifa is misrepresented about everyone then how do you find out the real abu hanifa after 1300 years.....
This is same as Christians saying that this is the real bible and all ghe stories of inqitah or broken chains are just stories....
Another 'original' take on Islam that must have gone over the heads of thousands of scholars these past 1400 years. 😏
🤦♂️ you should follow all the schools of thought and take the most authentic from what they say. We have scholars for this
It doesn't make any sense...
And that my friend, right there, is your fifth Madhab from Mr nobody on CZcams
this guy was always a hanafi .. he is from sub continent where majority is Hanafi … do not understand why he never unveiled it ..
I respect Abu Haneef and his methods. But this deviant praising him is worrying me.
Idolatry is ingrained in our genes
Basically you are saying you are a 'mukallid' or a blind follower.
What is that on his head?
A hat
He’s too old to wear a baseball cap backwards. If Billy Hoyle did it at age 31 that is the absolute upper limit.
@@mistermaykul says who? 😂 Don't make things up.
and why are the two interviewers laughing like immature fools, rather than understanding what this Ustadh is actually trying to say? Anyhow Nauman Ali Khan should be choosy in whom to give interviews and podcasts.
the guy on the right esp really needs a bit more balance to the way he behaves around guests. this clip was super difficult to watch.
Childish too. Palestinian children will give them a run, with their expert outlook and finesse. These guys are showing how dumb they really are.
They simply showing how stupid they really are. They lack finesse and if you don't know what to ask or say, giggle galore and hoot with laughter it covers the lack of intelligence. Allah guide them
I don't think so because at this moment of time we need message of islam to be widespread.
I appreciate the feedback. I'll try not to be an "immature fool" next time I interview someone. Within the wider context of the previous discussions, it was a light hearted moment. We weren't there to speak about madhahib as it wasn't the focus of the interview.
And Ustadh interviewed with us because I'm a student of his and on his research team. So the choice he made was with that in mind.
God bless you and as-Salaam Alaykum
The prof can handle himself, he’d have them for breakfast if they misbehaved, he was just playing with them
its Anafs in subcontinent who miss represented imam Abu hanfia RA with their self created stories and they do that because doing Taqleed itself make blind
the hosts seemed to be taking every note of NAK as a joke.
The salafis think everyone for 1200 years was on Biddah and Shirk, until der sheikh Abdullah abdulwahab came in this world...
Abu hanfifa was from the Salaf you dummy
😂 and what are you ? A greek philo ?
@@Dawahfro wait.. did u crack joke? Should i laugh??
true 😅😅
Why they're laughing 🤔
Because this is how a blind follower thinks. This is nothing new.
Nak should learn before talking
This guy doesn't know when to stop
no doubt he should be respected, and he is, however hanafi has deobandi and barali sub divisions, the latter seemingly similar to ahmadia muslims because they wanted to push back on the strict deobandi sect.
this has nothing to do with abu hanafi btw
I'd say Deobandis are closer to Ahmadia as they deny the finality of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) in the sense that they say that Allah can send more prophets after him but it doesn't diminish his status as the Final Messenger which common sense dictates it does, because the the Prophet Muhammad isn't the final Prophet anymore
Also don't consider them Hanafi subdivisions, but rather separate groups that happen to be Hanafi. It a sudden Shafi'i group came and started saying Allah is 4, you wouldn't call them a subdivision of Shafi'is, but a separate group.
do you know any shafi'is that do that? let me know so I wont consider myself a shafo'i muslim anymore@@azathoth3726
He didnt say he believes in Madhabs he said he thinks an Imam and another are awesome, Madhabs are one lf the Bid'as and Lies he spoke about because people tend to glorifie and worship the knowledge of someone and leave the Divine Scripture behind, and he spoke about how tremendous shocking act is that in the full podcast so dont spread lies, specially not lies he said people are lying about Imam's, no Imam said follow me i have a Madhabs, every Imam of the Real Imams was a student of knowledge and shared knowledge and thought it, but Madhabs thing is a human invention that has nothing to do with The Religion which is purely descended by Allah Subhanah and whomever follows that as a New part of religion is associating human with Allah, Allah said ask the people of experience if you dont know but never said that a humain can add something to the religion, he Said "Do You Think you're gonna Teach Allah you're religion??" As Mr. Nouman Explained you think you know more than Allah to add something to the religion wich He didn't put in it? Thats shameful to spread lies about the religion of Allah and the message of Nouman, and there's no bigger injustice than spreading lies about the religion of Allah.
None!! Just follow Quran and sunnah, and insha'Allah you won't get lost.
@Solitiam ! So Ustad isn't following quran😊
following the quran and sunnah makes you lost
Ja'far al-Sadiq > all 4 Imams
Who's Ja'far al-Sadiq?
I'm genuinely curious.
Very well said ...
@@robin1063 He's the teacher to Abu Hanifa and Malik ibn Anas ... Abu Hanifa even said "لولا السنتان لهلك النعمان" ... which means "if were for those two years, I would perish." Abu Hanifa meant, those two years that he acquired knowledge from Imam Ja'far Al-Sadiq (AS) .. But of course they learned from him and made changes and switched things up .. I'd highly recommend you research about Imam J'afar Al-Sadiq (AS) and the real Imams who are the sons of the prophet (S.A.W.A) ... J'afar Al-Sadiq (AS) was the 6th Imam from the prophet's progeny btw.
@@TheTruthWithAli Thanks for the reply. Just because he was their teacher doesn't mean I have to follow him. Being someone's teacher doesn't make them better at their craft.
From your logic, Einstein's teacher was better than Einstein?
@@robin1063 I understand but you didn't get the point carefully, not only their teacher .. but Abu Hanifa declared that if he didn't learn from him he would perish :) .. also he's from the prophet's progeny and his fiqh quotes the prophet directly (the prophet (S.A.W.A.) is his grandfather) .. so it's not only him being their teacher .. so your Einstein comparison is kinda silly with all due respect .. You'd find the changes in Abu Hanifa's teaching was due to authority at the time ... compare it with the pure teachings of Ja'far al-Sadiq (AS) and how the authority killed him at the time .. just how they killed all the Imams from the prophet's progeny .. instead of taking my limited youtube comment as a full argument you can research more about him and why he's more of an authority for Islamic fiqh.
What did Abu Hanifa's parents follow? That is what I would probably prefer to follow.
Yes ofcourse, those who follow people who died 24 years ago
Always say this .
They followed the prophet jst as we should be doing 😂 they were pious but where they were in error we do what the prophet did
What did sahaba read and know about Qur'an before Osman ra
The baseless brainless neosalafi slanderous rethoric
Such a dumb statement, back then most of knowledge was oral and not written down. Years after years the scholars wrote the knowledge. With your statemant you cant follow any scholar
Jaafari mazhab is the best, the true one
There is no jaafari madhab but u mean hanafi because Abu hanifa was a student of jafar and jafar was the student of Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr alsiddiq
@@Iamfsaly
Jaafari mazhab is the shia one, named after Imam Jaafar As-Sadeq a teacher of abu hanifa and malek, Imam As-Sadeq was taught by his father Imam Al-Baqer who was taught by his father Imam As-Sajjad who was taught by Imam Al-Husayn who was taught by his brother Imam Al-Hasan and his father Imam Ali who was taught by his father in law and cousin the prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon him and his family, his wasn't taught by Qasim
@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 The Shia do not possess a book by Imam Jaafar on jurisprudence nor on hadith that he composed or wrote with his own hand, or compiled for him by his close disciples, to which we can return with certainty that it was issued by him.
In contrast to the imams of the four schools of thought and others, each of them has left us a written book on jurisprudence and hadith:
Imam Abu Hanifa AlNuman bin Thabit (may God have mercy on him) left us his “Musnad” in the hadith. As for his jurisprudence, his direct students, such as Judge Abu Yusuf and Muhammad bin Al-Hasan Al-Shaybani, undertook to write it down and transmit it.
Imam Malik bin Anas (may God have mercy on him) left us his manuscript (Al-Muwatta) in jurisprudence and hadith.
Imam Al-Shafi’i (may God have mercy on him) left us the “Musnad” in hadith, and the book “The Mother” in jurisprudence. He is the founder of the science of “Usul al-Fiqh” in his book “The Message,” which is the first book in Islam written in its chapter.
As for Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal Al-Shaybani (may God have mercy on him), his “Musnad” in the hadith is more famous than fire in knowledge! As for his jurisprudence, it is preserved and recorded. It is the most famous
His students who wrote down the jurisprudence of Imam al-Khalal (may God have mercy on him) Even Imam Zaid bin Ali (may God have mercy on him) has a written jurisprudence, and a book of musnads on hadith.
Except Jaafar bin Muhammad Al-Sadiq! We did not find any book of hadith by him, nor a book of jurisprudence written by him or compiled by his students. They have no basis for what they issue fatwas about him except narrations, which they cannot be certain about the accuracy of their attribution to him. Rather, they declare their objection to them, and their doubts about their attribution!
The narrations attributed to him appeared a long time after his death! The oldest book of narration on the jurisprudential chapters approved by the Imamis that is available to us is the book “Furu’ al-Kafi” by Al-Kulayni, who died in the year 329 hijri. That is, 180 years after the death of Imam Jaafar al-Sadiq! Then came after him Muhammad bin Ali bin Babawayh Al-Qummi, who died in the year (381 Hijri), in his book (A jurist from whom the jurist does not attend). That is, more than 230 years after Jaafar
@@mhmadbedrddeen3414 The Shia authentic books claim to be “AUTHENTIC ISLAMIC SOURCES” but in reality they attack the authenticity of the Quran in many sources and they attack Ali (may Allah be pleased with him)
I can give you all the sources but it’s in a Arabic
@@mhmadbedrddeen3414except it's not authentically traced back to him.
Am i getting old? Why is everybody turning into a gangster?
Muscles, hairplants, fancy hats..
NAK has been wearing Fancy Hats, normal hats, white caps, different types of caps, Thobes, shirts, tshirts, kurta pajamas, and all kinds of clothes that a normal human wears for years. Maybe you are seeing it for the first time.
@@justhydr
What is your point little boy. Tell me, what is your point?
He changed a while ago? He doesn't change? He does not fashion? He is outside time? What is your point?
There's no scholar who would say having Muscles, hair plant and wearing caps is Haram, forget about haram they don't even fall within Makruh.
@@zaidan4329
Why don't you answer the question. Where does this need come from?
@@user-yc9xt8ed6u
Dear Kiddo,
My point is as clear as my answer to your main comment. May Allah give you and all of us good hidayah and understanding of deen.
it's about damn time that brother finally gave up pseudo-salafism. As a maliki i'm glad he's heading hanafi. i love imam Abu Hanifa
What about Just Salfism ???
@@youssefamr8073 what is just salafism?
@@juanmancha25 following Islam with the understanding of the Salaf only and not innovating in the religion
@@youssefamr8073 imam at tahawi ra was a shaafi’i who later became a hanafi. Imam Malik ra is from the salaaf. Imam bukhari ra has “golden chain” that includes imam Malik ra. This idea that following the salaf is possible without a sanad is nonsensical. If you would like me to elucidate this please push back on how i started this reply. But first make it make sense that following the salaf doesn’t include the actual salaf who codified the fiqh and also clearly elucidated our aqidah