Velikost videa: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Zobrazit ovladače přehrávání
Automatické přehrávání
Přehrát
10,000 gallons of water to put out a trash can. good job!
It took much longer than I thought it would
looks like that small fire dont care about your fail system :D
What foam? Fun fact, film studios have NO fire extinguisher systems
The water damage would be ridiculous with such a wide spread of water and then "foam" that resembles a watered down hair shampoo .
It took waaaayyy to long to put that out
*mission failed, we'll get em next time*
That foam was very watery. You did not have a good mixture. That’s why it took longer to put the fire out
Safeman4202 I was thinking the same thing
i was wondering that 2
Safeman4202, I thought it would be a snowrain-system...
Seems more like sprinklers than foam.
@@followerofchrist1961it's definitely foam just not much of it
Why did the ones in the back go first?
Foam?Where?
This doesnt look like foam its a sprinkler test
If a whole plane cached on fire the building would burn down by then because if it takes about 2 minutes to take out that small fire by the time 5 minutes hits with a plane fire it would run out by that time.
Vendor: Ok Sir where i must put my signCorporate man: Nice try
Millions of dollars go to waste because one spot got on fire... Very efficient 🤦♂️
Stoney_Eagle '
Stoney_Eagle
Espieza sordo buscar
looks more like a standard sprinkler system, as the foam was virtually non-existent
Maybe the bubblers are not working
Firefighters sometimes use foam, and I can only really tell on yt because the white left behind on the surface.
Ridiculous
That was not impressive.
Indeed not look how long it took for the fire to be put out
Not all about putting it out, it’s to contain spread of the fire
Fail, well try
Fail ...
Soo shit.
10,000 gallons of water to put out a trash can. good job!
It took much longer than I thought it would
looks like that small fire dont care about your fail system :D
What foam? Fun fact, film studios have NO fire extinguisher systems
The water damage would be ridiculous with such a wide spread of water and then "foam" that resembles a watered down hair shampoo .
It took waaaayyy to long to put that out
*mission failed, we'll get em next time*
That foam was very watery. You did not have a good mixture. That’s why it took longer to put the fire out
Safeman4202 I was thinking the same thing
i was wondering that 2
Safeman4202, I thought it would be a snowrain-system...
Seems more like sprinklers than foam.
@@followerofchrist1961it's definitely foam just not much of it
Why did the ones in the back go first?
Foam?Where?
This doesnt look like foam its a sprinkler test
If a whole plane cached on fire the building would burn down by then because if it takes about 2 minutes to take out that small fire by the time 5 minutes hits with a plane fire it would run out by that time.
Vendor: Ok Sir where i must put my sign
Corporate man: Nice try
Millions of dollars go to waste because one spot got on fire... Very efficient 🤦♂️
Stoney_Eagle '
Stoney_Eagle
Espieza sordo buscar
looks more like a standard sprinkler system, as the foam was virtually non-existent
Maybe the bubblers are not working
Firefighters sometimes use foam, and I can only really tell on yt because the white left behind on the surface.
Ridiculous
That was not impressive.
Indeed not look how long it took for the fire to be put out
Not all about putting it out, it’s to contain spread of the fire
Fail, well try
Fail ...
Soo shit.