Proton Launch

Sdílet
Vložit

Komentáře • 19

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 Před 14 lety

    What's interesting is that this rocket came VERY close to launching the first manned mission to travel to the Moon. The unmanned Zond spacecraft launched by this rocket flew several circumlunar missions and had the reliability been better, the Russians would have gotten a cosmonaut on a circumlunar flight at least two months before the Apollo 8 mission.

  • @Abanamat85
    @Abanamat85 Před 15 lety

    Impressive.

  • @LP006688
    @LP006688 Před 16 lety

    3. Fuel tank fracture at the facility of NPO "Energia" (Scientific-Production Unification "Energy") -- 63 dead, more than 200 sick or disabled for life. When many years later a liquid nitrogen tank valve failed (no danger at all, just a cloud of vapor), 5 persons died because of heart attack -- they just recalled the previous accident with UDMH.

  • @LowestSummit
    @LowestSummit Před 16 lety

    First, the name of the fuel is UDMH(Unsymmetrical DiMethylHydrazine).
    Second, it is poisonous of course. But it's not so poisonous as 7000 times of the cyanides. It just needs proper protection gear for the workers. UDMH is a quite famous propellant for space rockets, even western ones.

  • @LP006688
    @LP006688 Před 16 lety

    The most outstanding in the Proton is that it is a military conversion project. You may notice that it has very low exhaust signature -- engines and fuel being used in intercontinental nuclear missiles. The drawback: that fuel (NDMG) is 7000 times more toxic than any of cyanides... inhalation of its vapor either kills you or makes a disabled person for life.

  • @ec100
    @ec100 Před 16 lety

    Could they make the Proton Rocket into a reusable rocket cargo plane? They could add another equal set of engines on the front of the rocket to slow it down when it lands, as well as some wings. It could also possibly hover and land vertically like the lunar lander or land / glide horizontally like the space shuttle.
    This would make cross country flights faster and be a way to reuse the rocket and its engines more times.

  • @LP006688
    @LP006688 Před 16 lety

    Sorry, NDMG is russian transcription. And its poisonous equivalent was pronounced during my military training cources in The Moscow Aviation Institute some 23 years ago.
    Accidents I may recall:
    1. Splatter on top of a service hat, immediate neutralization -- nevertheless, full hair loss for life.
    2. Negligent vapor inhalation for 1 minute -- full paralysis for life half a year later.

  • @kosiak10851
    @kosiak10851 Před 15 lety

    Ariane has solid fuel boosters. Solid fuel rockets produce much more smoke than liquid fuel

  • @davidlucasfer
    @davidlucasfer Před 13 lety

    hermoso

  • @juggis
    @juggis Před 14 lety

    @merakhagen
    Proton uses hypergolic fuel and has no solid booster rockets.

  • @LowestSummit
    @LowestSummit Před 16 lety

    Ah, Nesimmetričnyj DiMetilGidrazin. I didn't noticed. Sorry for that :(
    I once read that the hydrogen cyanide(Median lethal dose = 0.5mg/kg)is far more harmful than the UDMH(Median lethal dose = 125mg/kg). I'm not as specialized in that kind of chemistry for knowing accuracy of those data, but if some material is 7000 times more poisonous than the cyanides it would be the most poisonous material in the world(like the botulinum toxin, which has median lethal dose of 0.000001mg/kg).

  • @ec100
    @ec100 Před 16 lety

    If they do decide to make a rocket cargo plane, can they name it after me?

  • @clod2692
    @clod2692 Před 11 lety

    russian use only liquid engine on most of their missiles,liquid fuel engines produce less smoke of solid fuel booster,and the arianne 5 has two of them

  • @AthenaSaints
    @AthenaSaints Před 15 lety

    Why Proton produce very little smoke compare to Ariane 5?

  • @lettucemonster
    @lettucemonster Před 14 lety

    It isn't more powerful; its less powerful than some other mixtures like LOX/Hydrogen and LOX/Kerosene. The advantage of these fuels (called Hypergolic btw) is that they can be stored as liquids at ambient pressure and temperature, and they ignite on contact with each other simplifying engine design.

  • @oxforduniversity34
    @oxforduniversity34 Před 16 lety

    The Russian Space shuttle isn't closed, the Russian gov't will not close the Buran project. They built 13 shuttles and their is possible talks for the 2015 Russia's Mar's mission will need a heavy payload rocket system, which Buran Energia is the most advanced powerful rocket system in the world. So there is a 10 year hold to reuse the shuttles again. Only one was destroyed but 3 are able to fly orbit if the time comes.
    Russia has regained it's Superpower status so the money is there to build.

  • @Abanamat85
    @Abanamat85 Před 15 lety

    Some sense of humor you have.
    I don't understand in humor.

  • @sevic333
    @sevic333 Před 15 lety

    I believe this fuel produces more power, but the downside is, it's more toxic ......dangerous!

  • @Kvartet
    @Kvartet  Před 17 lety

    it´s a russian rocket