The Queen’s Fury over Lilibet’s Name: Robert Hardman Reveals Truth in New Book| Good Morning Britain
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 01. 2024
- The man described as the King's shadow, Robert Hardman joins GMB today for an exclusive interview about his new book 'Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story' following the royals through the first year of King Charles' reign.
The book lifts the curtain on the monarchy. It is full of scoops and Robert reveals what the queen really thought about Harry and Meghan naming their daughter Lilibet. And also what our future king enjoys doing in his spare time.
Broadcast on 17/01/24
Stream Good Morning Britain live, every weekday from 6am on the ITVX 📲 daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Subscribe now for more! bit.ly/1NbomQa
Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!
The Good Morning Britain CZcams channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.
Join Susanna Reid, Ben Shephard, Kate Garraway, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am until 9 every weekday!
ITVX: daytimelink.itv.com/WatchGMBYT
Website: bit.ly/1GsZuha
CZcams: bit.ly/1Ecy0g1
Facebook: on. 1HEDRMb
Twitter: bit.ly/1xdLqU3
www.itv.com
#GMB #royalfamily #kingcharlesiii #harryandmeghan #princewilliam #lilibet - Zábava
For all of the people, including this presenter, who insist that Harry and Meghan did not have to ask the Queen's permission to use the name Lilibet, I would remind them that it is a matter of common courtesy and manners. The fact that they presumed they could use this intimate nickname, one that the Queen had specifically said she did not want the family to use after Philip's death, makes one question their motives. Are they doing it out of vengeance, out of a desire to co-opt the charm and aura of Elizabeth II, out of a quest for control? All of these scenarios seem possible. It never once occurred to me that they were doing it to honor the Queen. If they had wanted to honor her they would have named the baby Elizabeth. Of course they have never shown any taste or discretion in anything, so why begin with this?
👏👏👏👏👏
These so called experts are too lazy to research. Megaliar had already registered Lilibet as a domain name long before Haznoballs fooled the late Queen.
Oh whatever.
👏👏👏👏👏👏
@@joanie3452 and here comes Meg's #1 supporter. You need to get a life, dear
Her name was Elizabeth, not Lilibet. They knew what they were doing.
They still needed the queen's consent
Her name is lilibeth not Elizabeth
This woman asking questions is unbelievably annoying.
She thinks she is clever, but she is not. Earns a huge salary. why? I cannot understand. I cannot listen to her, though I've just clicked on that segment then quickly put sound down to write this comment.
The woman is the presenter Suzanna Reid.
She's a meg fan. I remember watching her trying to defend Meg against Piers Morgan years ago. The woman is clueless.
@@andiapple1532she is awful, indeed
She was definitely playing the devil's advocate.Not fond of her at all but she was doing what she felt she had to do for the show to be balanced.@@andiapple1532
If Harry and Meghan don’t sue him then you know it’s true. In my opinion
Where’s Piers😂😂😂😂😂
Piers is still traumatized over him being proven a liar in the last suit that Harry "WON."
@@slimtend4010 The only liars are Meghan and Harry!
The Piers that said to put it mildly the royal family have a dodgy track record on race. @@slimtend4010
@@slimtend4010
I would be careful what you write , it was not proven that Piers Morgan was responsible .Only two liars in this scenario and that are the two from across the pond. And I might add it will also be up to the British public whether we accept them back into the fold as RF members for the people of this country.
@@slimtend4010😂😂😂
Why would they want to name their daughter after a family member they not only estranged themself from but, also accuse them of being racist? 🤔
They named their daughter after the matriarch of the family. They weren't estranged from her now were they
@@cherrytraveller5915Bashing the family on tv while her husband was on his death bed I'm sure didn't endear them. They were estranged.
Many of us are definitely sure that there are NO children from both Harry and Meghan
Once more for the bitter throng, Harry & Meghan NEVER accused the Queen of being racist & NEVER insulted her either. Over & over & over H&M spoke about how much they respected and loved the Queen & Philip. By contrast, Charles, for years through his official biographer, spoke disparagingly about his parents. All the things about the Queen being cold and unfeeling and Philip being too tough came from Charles.
@@Lilly2023KLady you don't know what the Queen wanted , you don't know those people and you haven't had one conversation with anyone in that family. They can name their kid anything they want. Harry would have had to mention the nickname to Meghan in order for them to agree on it, so why blame Meghan ONLY when they BOTH agreed on the name? Oh because it's blame the half black lady for everything 😂 I see. Either that, or you're jealous of Meghan because I don't understand how she alone gets the blame for naming the kid that?
It's one thing to choose a name - but let's remember these two went and trademarked this particular name, even before their daughter's birth - so I would think in the future they might use it. It's a decent explanation why The Queen was angry - it wasn't the name, it was them saying they 'asked her permission'.
So crass, and so like them.
They even used George's security code name of Archie. And then the late Queens petname. Definitely intentionally done. Harry was never this bad before, but i can believe mm purposely would.
This is the crazy part. The trademarking.
That is so evil , fancy going behind the Queen's back .......That was a special private name given to her majesty ...a form of affection.....not to be shared by another member of the Royal family ......
The airtime they give to the Harkles is unbelievable 😮😮😮
Yes it is
Harry is the only relevant family member on global scale .
The Harkles have no concern for anyone other than themselves. Selfish and cruel. Poor Elizabeth…
How do you know its true. You people love to jump on everything
Queen has not been poor. Poorly treated, yes. And that's about it.
@@MichaelWilliams-fx8qf Most of us saw Oprah, saw some of Meghan's awful podcasts about herself, read Spare and saw his session with Gabor Mate. What else do you need? It is what they themselves said and did.
I will say that about the Royals
How can anyone say the book Spare is well written???
Of course, they can. I meant, it was a well written fiction! 😅
It was well written and often is the source the everybody use. It was not from a Royal biographer who have never met Harry or Meghan
I highly doubt that she was referring to Harry's book. She was referring to Robert Hardman's book when she said, "well written." That's why he said, "Thank you."
@@godisgoodallthetime3845 Harry didn't write it, a ghost writer wrote it. Also, she wasn't talking about Harry's book being well written. Robert Hardman's book is what she was referring to and that's why he said, "Thank you."
Spare tool, simple.
Copyrighting the name before the Offspring was even born shows the Carparkles true intentions. It's all about money for TOW.
How does he know what was said in the room when they had there conversation. Was he in the room????????????
The book is about the King, but they talk about Harry the whole interview. 😂😂😂
This is the publicity for the book. Maybe less than a page on Harry and Meghan and the rest? We'll see what post-read reviews say. If this is all it has to drum up interest it promises to be a dull read. Still, wait and see.
@@beewa8840will not be buying so do comeback here and tell us how it is.
Meghan and Harry are ‘living’ rentfree in the heads of these so called reporters 😂
@@godisgoodallthetime3845 I can't help you with that as I don't intend to buy it either. I will be relying on reviews of the book.
Harry is the most popular
Its 2024, and they are still talking about Harry and Megan. There are so many important things going on in the world. Of course, any stories in regard to Megan and Harry make money.
Why would they watch the Crown when they lived the real deal. The Queens nickname was given to her by her father when she was a child,what kind of person steals a beloved nickname for PR purposes because thats what it was.If they wanted to name their daughter after the Queen they would have chosen Elizabeth.
Yes ppl keep saying her name is Elizabeth but it isn't it's lilibet
If they would have named her Elizabeth, they could have given any nickname they preferred at a later date or only have used the nickname in their own home.
Actually the Queen's sister Margaret gave it to her she couldn't pronounce Elizabeth when she was little so that's where the nickname came from
My mistake I just looked it up queen Elizabeth actually couldn't pronounce her name so that's what she called herself
Yoko Soho and her no hair spare are just mean, cruel and despicable. Using the Queen's pet name for revenge because they weren't allowed to be only halfway in to the RF. The carparkles wanted the perks without doing Royal duties. Doesn't work that way.
Who's Yoko Soho prince harry is married to meghan markle and they have 2 children prince archie and princess lilibet which if the queen had any problem with would of told them stright away and made them change it the royal family never intended to welcome meghan in to the family they never wanted harry to get married they wanted him to be always single and following William and Kate around like a third wheel for the rest of his life they didn't want any wife of Harry's to take the media attention away from William and Kate so harry gave up he wanted a happy married life with the woman he loves so he said his goodbyes and left and after leaving and free to stop following the royal family's strict rules he wrote all his feelings and everything that has been on his mind for ages in to his book wheather everything in book is true or not is a different matter but he definitely used the book to get all the feelings that he's been forced to hide out in the open and probably breathe a sigh of relief afterwards knowing he got all his feelings out and got his side of the story out and can now close that chapter of his life and move on with meghan
@@heatherlingard9444 Don't forget the 100 million they got for it.
@@heatherlingard9444 Strangely neither Archie or Lilibet's birth certificates are available though by law both in the UK and in the US they should be. William and Catherine would never have wanted Harry to play gooseberry permanently, I don't think they liked Meghan, but would have been pleased to see Harry happily married. The strict rules were Harry's grandmothers rules and are not followed now, Catherine has much more freedom with her family and choices. Harry could have told his family his frustrations and feelings he did not have to attack them so publicly or viciously as he did, the result of which is that he has probably lost them or at the very least they will never trust him again. Harry now has no choice but to be happy with Meghan because while she has gained everything - British titles, children, lavish lifestyle, celebrity, etc. - Harry has lost so much - family, friends, respect, security and lifestyle paid for, military patronages and so much more. If they were to part Meghan would probably soon find a rich replacement but what Harry would do is of concern.
This ‘news’ story about the baby’s name is such utter nonsense. The Queen would have made her feelings known at the time. It’s funny how gossip aboutthis non event comes out now when the scandal around the King’s brother has resurfaced. Nice deflection. Is this guy after a Knighthood ?
This ‘news’ story about the baby’s name is such utter nonsense. The Queen would have made her feelings known at the time. It’s funny how gossip aboutthis non event comes out now when the scandal around the King’s brother has resurfaced. Nice deflection. Is this guy after a Knighthood ?
Even if they reconcile, the damage is done. They can’t be trusted. And without trust there is no relationship.
William will have a hard time of being brothers again
@@anohacharlesschlosser9305 William can go to Rose Hanbury for comfort.
I am purchasing Hardman's book tomorrow.
The book will sell as much as the other royal biographers lol😂
@godisgoodallthetime3845 You mean Scoobies drivel?
@@NordieJ I think Omid Scobie wrote his own obituary in Endgame, but he did not realize he was doing it.
@@godisgoodallthetime3845well said ❤❤
@@wendyturney8914 u wish 😅
Wouldn’t believe Meghan or Harry ever if their tongues came NOTARIZED
So many sugars here🤣🤣🤣 wow
The sugars are here. It is despicable that the Yacht Girl and Puppet did this to our late Queen.
Sugars are fuming cos their grifters have been exposed
Sugar Daddies..
Not everyone can be a Sussex hater 24/7 ! We have lives 😅😅
Lies he is selling a book 😮
More bullying of a toddler.
I’m confused here. For a private family how many biographers and royal experts are there??? How do these people become biographer and experts if the royal family is so private?
Exactly
Live and let live. God is love.
They are usually part of the Royal rota and develop relationships over time. This fellow is highly regarded for his integrity by the other biographers.
Access to place sources.
So true. These "Biographers" and "Royal experts" are gossip mongers and are making money on hearsay
If harold becomes a working royal again i will be first in line to vote for a republic.
Do it now please 🙏🏿 join the Republic movement. We need people like you 👍
@@godisgoodallthetime3845 We tried it but the people didn't like it and brought the King back. I suppose you could wish we had a Trump. Putin, King Jong Un or Xi Jinping - is that what you really want?
@@wendyturney8914 No, someone like a Obama, Biden or anyone that will unite the country. Monarchy is only good for the king and heir and everyone is chop liver. We are all equal in the eyes of the Lord.
LOLOLOLOL... Biden uniting the country? You've obviously not been paying close attention.
@godisgoodallthetime3845 sorry, bad example. Obama didn't unite the country
If Hardiman knew the truth in the Lilibet fiasco why did it take him so long to reveal it? And anyway, how do we know it IS the truth?
If it wasn't, Harry and his wife would sue him
peterplant2669 The BBC reported back at the time H and M didn’t get permission and H and M didn’t sue! The Q said after Philip died she didn’t want it used again. It’s fine if they had used just Lilli or Elizabeth but very odd MM usurped the entire private name. I think she did only because the Q wouldn’t allow them to use “Sussex Royal” months earlier.
I heard that they asked our late Queen for permission to use her name, she agreed assuming that the little girl would be called Elizabeth, but MM isn't that nice a person.
Asking to call a child that don't even exists, they don't have any children
😂😂😂 bullsht !
I wonder if this is true. I'm aware of her moonbump. But there were pictures of them wit h the kids. How could they rent the kids and have the name registered in the system if the kids weren't their was still my question til now@abuelitachichi2012
@@VioletInGeneralThe children wouldn’t be in line of succession if they weren’t family by blood, people are just inventing things because they’re obsessed haters.
I don’t blame their royal highnesses for not watching the…. Crown.
How COULD they watch it??? It must drive you crazy, because you know the truth
The 2 thing's that irritated me the most was Megan saying i can't believe we don't get paid for royal duties. Naming their daughter by the nickname the queen was given to her by her father was slap in the face & a big FY. They didn't ask the queen for permission & they should have been happy with sliding Diana in her name. 😢
She never said it. She made a snippy joke at a badly organised event to the person who was being paid and was stuffing it up.
Harry had discussed the name for years, before Meghan. It's not a special name. Her grandfather called one of his horses Lillbet in 1931.
You will be angry for the rest of your life because Lilibet will be 3 and they are not changing her name.
Even if Meghan made the statement of not getting paid, she was right. Charles gets paid, kate gets paid, William gets paid, zara gets paid, andrew was being paid before and after his crimes, so why should Meghan work for free? Where do all the taxpayers money go to if they don't pay Meghan? That is called slavery and Meghan saw right through their bs, she packed her bags, took your princes and left. Goodbye to nonsense
@@godisgoodallthetime3845 I didn't say I was angry, I said I was irritated. Go and pray to God for my sins & my soul. Your ridiculous.😏
@@catherinemurphy1264 Yeah whatever makes you feel better.😉
How Susanna Reid still has a job is beyond me. She’s so annoying.
I’m guessing she said that not when they told her they were naming their daughter Lilibet, but after she found out they had secured the website and had plans to monetize the name. (Probably as a blowback for the Queen shutting down Sussex Royal.) I can’t imagine what these two put the Queen through in her last years. Treasonous at some level, IMHO. (Ps… Lilibet is an online casino.. so the name is likely not available for the Sussexes to brand.)
I thought she was denied in her efforts to do this
I am not so sure about that. If you recall, after the birth of Harry’s daughter, the then Cambridges tweeted congratulations and specifically referred to her as Lily. I think this is a subtle clue as to what Harry told the Queen what they were going to call her when he asked permission to name her after the late Queen. I think the tweet of the then Cambridges on that day served a similar function to the “recollections may vary” position following the Oprah interview. Harry probably told her they would name her Lily Diana or Elizabeth Diana and use the diminutive of Lily. I think she was upset by both the bait and switch, and the copyrighting of her nickname. I am surprised journalists have not gone back to any royal twitter posts related to this birth.
@@tamtamarjam4746 I have read that there is a little girl born on the same date locally who was registered on her birth certificate as Elizabeth Diana, but there is no registration of Lili's birth certificate although they are obliged by law to do so.
Just be nice Harry and Meghan alowd to call their daughter what they want 😢
There is no Lilly bucks
A Narcissist will crush an optimist due to their naivety always !!! 😮😮😮
I want to read Robert Hardman’s book interesting to what the Queen thought of the grifters
You forgot to mention what she thought of a p....disgracing the family.
Newsflash troll, that book wont sell as well as spare or endgame. 90% of the world doesn't buu the bs the uk publishes
The book will sell as much as the other royal biographers lol😂
@@belladolce998”sell as well as Endgame”??!?? One of the biggest flops in history?? Alrighty then…..🙄😂😂
Maybe Harold and Meghan should have named their daughter "Dorito," after Meghan's mother.🤣😂
Dorito Diana or Diana Dorito? 😢
Yes “Dorito Dutch” Mountbatten
No money in that name
Why are you bullying meghans mum who has nothing to do with this ? Are you really that vile
That should have been Kate’s daughter name
The late Queen is being made to look petty and racist by these silly claims.
Does any one take that much notice of Meghan any more?
@@wendyturney8914 Meghan isn't making this claim. Some book grifter is.
@@wendyturney8914 yes,just read the comments. Obsession level!
Exactly ! Like why a grandmother would be devastated because she shared a name with a granddaughter !! BS as usual
The Queen doesn’t look petty at all and what does race have to do with this conversation NOTHING
They wouldn’t even have thought of that name if it wasn’t the Queen’s pet name from her father. It’s so cruel to show such disrespect and then take a special memory from her. They did it for spite and what kind of parents would name a child for spite. They have no humanity. Selfish to a breathtaking degree.
Don't project your insecurities onto someone else. QEII is dead and can't refute these claims, what some people name their child is absolutely no business of yours. If you want to see cruel and spiteful in action then look no further than the atrocities occurring in Gaza.
@@heysuse She would have then been accused of racisim. That simple
@janwallace5005 incorrect...Meghan had bought the domain names on lilibet and put a copyright on it before the baby was born. So if you condone those actions well I feel sorry for you. All in preparation to merchandise the name.
@@heysuse Harry hasn't shown any honour towards his family.
@@annatheocharous2592all royals & celebrities do this with their own names & children's names. It isn't original to her.
Andy Pandy the squeaky clean p, so clean he's not mentioned! What a farce?
You want to sell your book, I am sure you are yourself a great grand father, will you be upset if one of grandchildren wants to give your childhood name to their child, shame on you for trying to divide other people children, I wish you can be sued
I don’t watch The crown!
Some of are aware that “The Crown” is not a documentary. 😂
of course, this rehashing the sos blahblahblah
They purchased several domain names featuring Lilibet before their daughter was even born!
If someone in my family behaved the way Henry has, we'd never see him again.
Oh dear ! Harry must be devastated by ur opinion
Amen
@@lindajetton9664don’t say Amen for evil stuff like that
For those who are ignorant, this is the Royal Family we’re talking about, not an ordinary family. Even for an ordinary family, the choice of names must be respectful.
For the Royal Family, they need to have the Queen’s approval for names of newborns, who would decide on how appropriate the names would be, the history etc and to be respectful.
The dishonorable grandson claimed to have spoken to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, he could have tricked the Queen by telling her they wanted to name the daughter after her, in which case, one would assume it’s Elizabeth.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II had every right to be angry, especially since she was asked to corroborate with the despicable duo’s lies.
There was never any intention of honoring HMQE2 as the evil-minded duo’s desire was to spite her.
Naming their daughter Elizabeth is one thing but using the late Queen’s very special pet name that only a few had the permission to use is downright cruel and disrespectful!!!
The incorrigible and dishonorable duo only wanted to belittle the late Queen by being able to call out the name as and when they like.
Or even to see which Lilibet would come running whenever they call.
Too long, didn't read.
@@bart234465 That's a shame - you've only ready comics.
Their behaviour is despicable… but so like “H/M”
Harry had silver wings; you can’t fly solo with silver wings. Prince William has gold wings and can fly solo. Personally I think Ms. Sanchez should win the Nobel Peace Prize for just being wonderful and fabulous and absolutely gorgeous.
Does Camilla take time off to nurse Charles?😊
Who knows it's really no one's business
So people are made at a name but not mad at Andrew..🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
Andrew has many faults but he never set out to hurt his own family and unlike Harry he was very good to the Queen during her final months at Windsor.
That would tell you everything you need to know about these people 😂😂
@@wendyturney8914 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
When is meg gonna be held accountable when how much more chaos & havoc is meg allowed to cause before meg is held accountable
The author of the book has gone on the record that QE didn't mind H+M naming their daughter Lilibet. What upset the QE was HOW they handled it, they presented QE as having given her blessing, but they 'put words' in her mouth that she never said, which is what upset her, not that they named her Lilibet. I am not a fan of the couple but this is what the author has cleared up. Obviously, H+M caused QE emotional pain, and that is what is tragic.
I’m a little confused..Why did she say she didn’t own the palaces or the paintings, but she owned her name and they’d taken that from her?
Yes but you left out one point.... the fact the bought all the domain names in regards to lilibet dianna and put a copyright on lilibet all before the baby was born.
Interesting. I wonder why the late Queen REFUSED to be photographed with Lilibet but was quite happy to be photographed on numerous occassions with her other great grandchildren. Smacks of someone who was not too happy
@@Cass234 Because she was upset. She had asked that Lilibet not be uttered again after her husbands death
Yes, I am confused about that as well. I replayed the author's response to the question several times to find the loophole. @@Cass234
I could have done without seeing Harry’s mug behind the author 🙈
Can’t wait to read his book! ( the woman asking questions needs to learn to respect the interviewees responses, she’s horrible)
The book will sell as much as the other royal biographers lol😂
@@godisgoodallthetime3845in my local WHSmith store in my town shopping centre king Charles books 📚 have been reduced to half price no one has bought them.🤣
Oh, PULLLLEASE! This is so DROLL, daaarling. A parent can name their child anything they want. These days, they can even declare their gender.
This was the Queen's private pet name though. You'd think they would have sought her views beforehand. It's only polite. I'm sure she would not have minded. The problem was they told everyone she had given permission when they hadn't even told her beforehand. That was a lie. You don't involve the Queen in a lie.
That woman keeps cutting Mr Hartman off. So rude.
Neither do I..nonesense a lot of it..God save the King..👑🙏🇬🇧
Megaliar Skidmarkle basically had sparry write the book spare. He's just as bad yet she's the prime example of how the wrong life partner can ruin someone's life.
I doubt everything in the SPARE was written by Harry I'd bet alot of it was markles going
I doubt everything in the SPARE was written by Harry I'd bet alot of it was markles doing I don't feel one bit sorry for harry
This guy looks like he was on Episten island with Andrew
His book was written about King Charles. What's related to the baby's name? It is all on purpose to boost sales.
Hello harry & megan how are you?
How is archie and lilibeth?
This great respected author SHOULD NOT HAVE STARTED HIS BOOK INTERVIEW ON THIS SHOW. That woman is downright rude another look at me look at me.
So sick of these presenters.
Just a name! The queen wasn’t selfish. She can share her name. Maybe in the future will be many babies with that name.
No-one would ever be happy to be back in Birmingham.
......are you suggesting that the Queen is that petty? this is an insult to the memory of Queen Elizabeth..
Always talking about Meg and Harry. What about Andrew?!
bc the palace has told them not to, but PH is fair game
If they get back together at some point, which they may the Harkle need to be quiet for a while, stop telling everybody else’s business, including their own. That’s why it’s called a private life obviously, Harry and his wife are not aware of how to behave. They are simply in embarrassment to both countries.
They haven't said anything. It's other people and journalists trying to milk this family and make a quick buck.
How does this Robert bloke think his book will benefit the RF?
@@RTG1031 They haven't said anything! They've done nothing but talk for the last few years problem is everything that comes out of their mouths is a lie or a half truth but mostly lies.
@@suz1233there is a difference between responding to a false narrative..and talking. What do you expect, as those fake stories from the 'Royal Source, Royal leaks' kept spreading they should have kept quite? It's obvious to the world that Meghan was hated by the RF from day one, except the queen who seemed always happy around her.. now it's no secret how intensely hated Meghan is.
Yet ANOTHER one writing a Royal gossip book. These people make a fortune peddling this drama.
It's a fictious series. Not a documentary, biography, movie. I didn't know this and Series 1 is imbedded in my head as far as fact. 🇺🇸
RACISM and HYPOCRISY THIS SHOULD BE KEPT PRIVATE...
Parents, all parents have the right to name their children. Human names are not owned, they are not product brand names.
There daughter is two years old, why now? Let it go
This is a ridiculous discution.
Of all the queen's granddaughters none thought about naming a granddaughter after the queen to honor the queen untill Meghan's name her daughter to honor the queen its now a problem. People move on. I really hope, and wish well for both brothers and their family.
Charlotte's full name is Charlotte Elizabeth Diana
All the late Queens great grand daughters have Elizabeth as their middle names
I have read many times that there is no birth certificate in California on the date of Lily’s birth for a “Lilibet”. There is a birth record for “Mary Diana Mountbatten Windsor”.
U read wrong
Where did you get this information from? I would love to see it if you could share the source with me
Doria Diana😂😂😂😂 much better
Now look up for Archie.
@@VioletInGeneral if you have some proof that they have children then post it here.. if none, then let us laugh
It shows they respect to queen. Many parents do the same and no one see problem
I’m having my cake and eating it too, no piers AND the truth being out.
Oh come on, she his grandmother. We watch these people on TV, but he grew up with her. So if he want to name his daughter after her, who cares. Queen Elisabeth doesn't care anymore for nothing for sure, so.....
I turned that interview off🙄 when l put my television 📺 on then l realised they were talking about Harry and Meghan l am 🥱 bored hearing about them GMB haven't got anything else to talk about.
🙏 Robert Hardman book doesn't make a good sell thank you JESUS you know the truth
Not only the queen, but the entire universe is disguised that this nobody, from nowhere, with nothing to say, would take The name from the Queen.
I refused to watch The Crown the last two seasons out of respect. I hope Robert Hardman's new book does very, very well.
out of respect for what? whatever......
@@lynnhubbard844 I know… you wouldn’t understand
Princess Lilibet Diana of Sussex. Such a beautiful name for a beautiful lady girl. We love you baby girl with those blue blue eyes ❤❤❤❤❤❤
She has blue eyes? With her mother being biracial?
There is a record of a baby girl born on the same date in her locality called Elizabeth Diana but no registration of the birth of Lilibet, although it would be illegal not to register the name.
I love the name ❤ PRINCESS LILIBET OF SUSSEX ❤❤
@@Carole1279 she is an American and we have no titles. Ok?
So she cannot be claimed as a Nigerian princess?
I would not watch anybody, re-creating my life because it was enough to live it
I hope this book far surpasses the sales of Henry’s Spare(whagh).
That female anchor with the brown hair is extremely irritating and not easy to watch.
There are so many books from this so-called Royals rota and Royals insiders
All of a sudden we’re interested in THE TRUTH
About effing time
Why why why do people think The Crown is real?
exactly...well most don't even know the characters and how they fit together either
Same as coronation street,emmerdale,etc-they recieve presents if main characters have babies,or die,or marry,saddos
Cannot stand suzanne Reid i find her very condescending and arrogant.
Its genuinely embarrassing that anyone cares enough about the royal family. Any of the people who show up on news channels and call themselves royal experts makes me cringe
So they like to name their children after other family members nicknames. First Archie after Prince George nickname and now the Queen. The children both look adorable and very sweet. 😊 💖💖
have you seen them?
Ahh cheeky now are we? Alright... Yes I've seen them and photoshopped or not both children look adorable and very sweet 😊💖💖
Why would George be nicknamed Archie tho ? It doesn’t make any sense
Where and when have you seen these "children "? The rest of the world don't even know whether they exist.
@@spider-internet9782
For security purposes, I understand.
The Queen won't like this she must be rolling in her grave will not be buying this book
If walking a lie back had a face 😂😂😂
I don't watch the crown either. The show is inaccurate. 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
Is there anything about King Charles in the book????😅
Don't call Harklers daughter Lilibet, call his 2nd child
Warrants a DNA test.
Or just say his daughter…😅
If she exists. Did Meghan really give birth in June 2021?
There are no kids period
Princess Lilibet of Sussex ❤❤❤
Please more insight on Kate, Andrew and their engagement with Epstein. Not on the irrelevant issue about the child of non working royals who are not dependent on UK taxpayers money.
The monarchy is financed from The Crown Estate. The Prince of Wales is supported by revenue raised by the Duchy of Cornwall. The State only pays for State occasions.
Basically writing his own opinions, gossips and labelling it as the truth to sale book. Cite the sources, bring evidence just like you would be requesting from them about their own lives. Can't give a straight answer. If the Queen has any issue with it, she would have said so and she didn't. Please, let's her rest in peace!
all these news channels blowing up something out of nothing
No No No…… I cannot watch this women without Piers. She’s nothing without Piers.
2024 is full of surprises 🙄
What else is in the book?
Why are the film clips blurred?
Looking forward to reading this book, it will be at the top of my birthday list in march
Who will buy this Book ???
Not me I'd rather spend my money on having pizza delivered 😂
@@suzannecollier5240 you are right
Bon appétit
@@soniabambe741 as a matter of fact I'm eating pizza right now🤗