I have not seen this before now. My sister's office was where the nose of the plane went in. My solace is that she probably did not know what happened. Thanks for a terrific animation.
Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.
It’s disturbing to think there were people in that plane, and people right there at their desks, that were either crushed or incinerated or both. The ones who died instantly were spared the horror, despair, injury and pain of those who survived, only to die in the collapse.
Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11. It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors. I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).
@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.
There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images
I did,I lost my brother Kohn M Rigo at the WTC in NYC. He was working for Marsh in the self insured group at the time. I think about my brother John every day and still I miss him. FYI - I pray for all the folks murdered on 09:11 and their families and friends .☮️✝️☮️✝️☮️✝️
Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are. For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD. They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured. You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult. Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct? So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say . MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG. This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism. ⬇️ .................................... One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911. The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001 The WTC broke ground in 1968. And fell 33YRS later in 2001. The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller. He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001. In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11. The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC. The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on 9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell. The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test. The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor. 6+3=9 8+3=11 1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS. media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster. (Good watch) 30 min . WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914 07+28+19+14= 68. WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939 09+01+19+39= 68. RUSS/UKRAINE aka WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022 02+24+20+22= 68. 6 + 3=9 8 + 3=11 The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s. If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision. ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11. Revelation 9:11 Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit. Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION. Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION) You'll find a book titled TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA. Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN. I know it sounds batshit crazy. BUT? There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume. The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin. if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards Take out the word ALAH it spells I AM SATAN. AILAM AHSATAN MALIA NATASHA There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan. Luke 10:18 kjv I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning..... ( Lightning, Fall from high ) Hebrew translation Barac bama. A FESTIVAL in Italy called CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON. NO OPINIONS All facts. You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF. If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐
Like the Original Architect said many times, it’s like a hole puncture into a screen, built with the capability withstand multiple 707 hits which were also wide body aircraft in their day‼️
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.
Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.
Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.
On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...
I was a tourist that day visiting NYC - my third time there at the time. I really wanted to go to the top of the twin towers and we had tried to go the previous weekend but it was full. We were supposed to go on tuesday but my family decided last minute we would go to empire state instead and visit the WTC later in the day. While we were getting ready to head out that tuesday morning, we all found ourselves glued to the TV in our hotel watching the horrible images. What a scary time, I was just 13 and couldn't believe it was real.
Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going. Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?
I love how people are so possessed by the delusion that airplane wings are “flimsy” or “paper thin.” Airplane wings are extremely strong and can support several times the plane’s weight. I don’t know the rating of 767 wings, but some plane wings are rated at 12 times the plane’s weight. Have you seen a stress test? The wings can bend fully vertical and they don’t break. Also this notion that planes are built like soda cans? The aluminum they use is usually 6061 or 7075. Both of them are high quality and very very strong, and are also, you know, NOT the only metals they use… like, they have titanium and steel parts too, guys. Planes are friggin strong.
There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.
@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology. The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.
The simulation of the crash is impressive. How sad what happened, not only because of the loss of life, but also because of the demolition of the towers. I was 5 years old when it happened, so I don't remember the attack, but I know we were all glued to watching the television. Greetings from Argentina.
it's counterintuitive but that's how it was, ie: foam can cut a hole through a thick high durability carbon fiber panel at the right speed, it took real tests to convince many NASA engineers that it was a thing. When you think of foam, you think anything but it being something so strong to go through one of the strongest materials. Momentum changes things drastically, in the end it's all about energy vs time distributing through materials.
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shakes while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it a computer animation is, same like this video. and this means government of USA was involved and is guilty
@@mindblow7617 Good analogy. To understand what foam at high speed can do, one only needs to remember the Columbia disaster. A piece of foam broke off the center tank and struck the shuttle wing putting a hole through the toughest part of the shuttle and causing it to disintegrate on reentry.
I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?
You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.
Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.
No... I'm sorry, but in no way do I buy this. Aluminium that has been completely obliterated and destroyed from the impact cannot slice and cut through solid steel like that.
I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.
consider the fact a boeing 767 can travel between 500-600mph. this video helps show what happens to a skyscraper when something that size going that speed crashes into it. regardless of conspiracies of who was actually behind the attack, the planes flying into the buildings are what destroyed them
At the speed they pretend an airplane hit, the wings would first be torn from the body at sea level air density. And second when an object moves above 400 mph hits a solid object it atomizes and turns to dust. The image of the building so perfectly done was created with explosives. It even shows the shape of the engines. It's more like a cartoon than reality.
the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened. The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes. Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?
@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.
Imagine going to work that day only to find yourself locked in a decision to either be burned alive, suffocate until you died, OR still alive but barely able to breathe until the weight of the collapsing building crushed you, OR jump in which you felt like you were on the world's scariest rollercoaster going down for about 4 seconds before being hit with the most pain you've ever felt in your life for a brief one second, until you were dead. For 2,977 people, the end of the world came that day.
This is 16 years old and new to me. I'm 'glad' to see it. I have often wondered if there was any educated guess as to how things happened inside the building as the plane hit. Amazing what technology can do. I understand much better now how and why the buildings fell; I can see that it was a death blow to the buildings from the beginning. It seems that the people on the planes were killed immediately by the incredible impact, thankfully. Also that the people working on those immediate floors never knew what happened.
Ясно видно,что сердцевина здания,стальные опорные балки, мало пострадали. Здание не могло обрушиться из-за самолётов. Кроме того здание WTC 7 тоже обрушилось,но самолёты туда не попали
@@user-yg7zn6cy8oбесполезно объяснять. У них другой менталитет) они более подвержены массовой истерии и доверия к дядям с погонами. А мы наоборот никогда дядям не верим) Мне как инженеру по образованию очевидно, что самолёт из алюминия даже на скорости в 500+ км в час не способен сложить это здание пополам. Сердцевина максимум погнута но не порвана. И авиационный керосин не способен гореть с такой продолжительностью и температурой при дефиците кислорода, чтобы расплавить стальные колонны. Там инженеры тоже не дураки проектировали. Здание было рассчитано и под самолёт и под мощный пожар. Не было рассчитано оно только под систематический подрыв силовых элементов по площади) а и ещё, если бы верхушка даже и рухнула, то рухнула вбок, в сторону гле самолёт врезался, так как там больше топлива горит и больше погнуто колонн, и скорее всего частично разрушив под собой этажи, она бы рухнула под углом на город, но уж точно не прямо вниз как при инженерном сносе) Самое доверчивый народ это американцы. ))
The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.
Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity! So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate. p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....
@@anthonywilliams7052 how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too. The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too. We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office. Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back. Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender". p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.
@@anthonywilliams7052 well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce). I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them. The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes. Has this theory ever been substantiated? I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact. The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names. But I can't find any such experiment. So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities. Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable. That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies. The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further. Why not? There's no proof of the other theory. So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true. Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory? I can't and I haven't and I've looked. If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too. But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program. It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too. However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched. That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool. And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes. I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day. It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves. The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface. Figures don't lie but liars can figure. Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.
The plane, that is virtually made of aluminum, hits the second tower and cuts through a steel and concrete building, in tact, like a knife through butter, no wing or tail damage, but the plane that hits the Pentagon virtually disappears, engines and all, wings collapse, engines disintegrate, no seats, luggage, just disappears. You can't have it both ways and besides, both scenarios defy the laws of physics !
If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy? Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know. If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it. Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911. I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere. Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff. Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty
i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??
One thing that most analysts neglect to include in the total collapse of the towers is that at the top of each tower was a 30 foot thick solid slab of formed concrete used as a ballast to combat swaying in the wind. It had so much mass that moving it back and forth was nearly impossible. However, once put into downward motion from the collapse of just one weakened floor, the mass of concrete would have nothing to stop it. The second plane was larger and weakened a few floors at a slightly lower level and so that building collapsed much faster. So, the ingenious feature to help stabilize the building in intense winds also helped to hasten its total collapse.
I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.
@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. CZcams was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.
@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.
One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.
No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.
I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked. A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited. It is horrifying. However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).
You have to consider the energies at those speeds. As seen repeatedly in tornado and hurricane damage, even small, light-weight materials can do amazing things when given enough energy and velocity.
@@buttafan4010 Who says, a RW nut job? Conclusion: There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.
@@douglasross594 Can you find specific faults with Harrit's scientific paper? Who are the THEY you are referring to ... N.I.S.T.? NIST did not test for accelerants because they said there were no loud explosions. Thermate does not make loud explosions. And stop calling it thermite. It was not thermite. It was nano thermate; basically thermite + sulfur that has been weaponized. So there was no arson investigation as mandated by NYC fire regulations. I called several NYC fire investigators, and some from other major cities, and they all said that they do not "pull" buildings ... as Larry Silverstein stated on video. Are you a person who conflates religious and national myths such as those outlined for the 9/!! Commission members before their first meeting by Philip Zelikow. Why would side with the Mossad?
Just like the old rose said in Titanic movie..in the beginning scenes .... Thanks for your scientific explaination but the experience of it was much different
Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.
@@onumahobart8832 no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all. If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny. We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery. It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.
So it did not explain how everything top to bottom was pulverized in all three buildings, and on the way down. Controlled demo has trouble doing it without effecting complete pulverization.
Very simple. Once the remaining steel structure was softened by the subsequent fires, the combined weight of the floors above the compromised areas caused them to yield. Once that momentum began, each succeeding floor of concrete was pulverized outward and downward into the next floor. Steel columns were no match to hundreds of millions of pounds of concrete (each building was estimated at 1 BILLION pounds each above the street) and collapsed outward and downward as well. Those huge plumes of "smoke" that billowed out with the collapse were in fact pulverized concrete particles...extremely bad for one's health. No demolition of any kind was used or needed. Sheer physics did this.
@@kurtfrancis4621 OK then why do controlled demolitions fail miserably sometimes? And explain the 3rd Building, which was not hit...? Building fire? There are many failed controlled demolitions. Believe what you wish. Of, and where did the molten steel come from? Jet fuel is basically kerosene. One can easily see most flashed off in a matter of seconds outside of the building.
@@ericmuetterties1984 You'll get crickets on that one. But physics, to many of these internet professionals, has diesel fuel fires vapourizing titanium.
@@livestock9722 Certainly questionable why there was molten steel in the basement for months. In fact the molten metal was a huge hinderance to cleanup. Still trying to figure out how to melt steel with diesel fuel ;-) Most don't realize Jet A is diesel. Also most of the fuel was burned immediately in a visible fireball. Oh well... The truth is too hard to swallow.
@@ericmuetterties1984 The whole thing continues to be questionable. Especially over 1 billion in precious metals that went missing from WTC7 underground vaults, that happened to fall in on itself so precisely, all by it's lonesome. Maybe it was sad...
The only thing I find funny about this (from a 2021 standpoint) is how he keeps reiterating that it's a state of the art animation system. My, we've come a long way. Edit: how are there 62 replies on this thing already
We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.
@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics
This is the first and last time in history that an aluminium plane (wings, tail section and fuselage) passed effortlessly through reinforced concrete and steel girders. Someone is gonna have to rewrite the laws of physics. ‘To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction’
Building 7 fell at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance and was not hit by an aeroplane . Newton's 3rd law of motion apparently took the day off. Obvious controlled demolition.
Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...
The demolitions were placed perfectly by demo experts. Did you know that the chief of security until 9-11-01 was Marvin Bush, George bush's little brother? YES george bushs brother ran the WTC SECURIITY and his contract ended 9-10-2001...
@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!
And this shows what a lot of people sadly do not understand. Sure, jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, but the debris of the plane knocking out so many of them weakened that section so much that, between the weight of the upper floors and the heat, the rest of the beams buckled and the upper-floors collapsed, essentially pancaking the building all the way down. A simple game of Jenga will teach you this stuff.
@@TheStrangeKage That one is unexplainable. In my opinion, the fire marshal and the city probably deemed it too expensive to repair (cheaper to rebuild), so they imploded it and just lumped it in with the other buildings as a loss.
@IAmNeomic do.ypu understand what it takes to rig a building day of during a pandemic to be a perfect execution? (Video of my 911 experience, dropping tomorrow) I was right by building 7
I agree, especially in that manner. I really wanted to see an analysis of everything provided, how hot the beams would have been at the core for it to completely fold in on itself. I would think hot steel beams would just bend and if anything maybe it would come down at an angle not just completely disintegrate straight down..
especially when other planes hit other building before and never took them down. also buildings burned for hours and days and still never fell. these buildings fell as like it was with controlled demolition. just look it up on youtube, it's all there to see.
Did you know Osama was actually a structural engineer. Since the building was made out of steel beams with very little concrete, the steel does not have to melt to collapse, once it gets hot because of the fires, the weight above it will make the columns bend. This will cause all the weight above to come down and sort of form a domino effect. Every time a floor falls the total weight that's falling gets bigger, which caused what seemed like a controlled collapse. The attack on the WTC also caused a giant change in skyscraper design, it is the main reason that these kinds of buildings are mostly made out of concrete centers at least
@@NFSGamerful we have seen many buildings burning for hours yet didn't fell, also can you explain why second tower which was hit fell before the first one if burning jet fuel was the reason for core collapse? Tower 1 went down after 45 minutes of burning. And also explain how WC 5 fell which was a bit away from WC 1 and 2 while the building just close by remained intact? Only fools will believe this shit. And btw OBL was not a architect or construction expert. He was millionaire who just inherited the construction business from his father. And his education was in economics and business administration. All the billionaire send their kids for same rather then some technical fields as they know their kids has to run the business, for technicalities they can hire cheap labour...
@@Spooferish, as we havbe seen many buildings fall after burning. Just ready the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation report by yourself. WTC 5 didn't fall but WTC 7. There are several investigations about WTC 7 too. It is important to read them yourself and not blindly follow the opinion of some CZcamsrs. Most of them lie or leave out many details from the official investigation to make their story sound believable. For example, *_none_* of the WTC buildings remained really intact. All of them were badly damaged, most of them so bad that they couldn't be repaired.
Omg so true! One aluminium plane can definitely cut through 47 steel columns. If you don't believe then take some baking foil and fold it in half to make it stronger then cut a steel spoon in half. It works!!! my spoon even caught fire from the vicious impact of the super strong baking foil. I hate my science teacher he lied to me because aluminium is way stronger than steel.
Ian Pemberton One is designed to take the impact of a couple airliners. and the other is designed for flight. Secondly the supposed commercial aircraft couldnt reach its highest speed which is mid 400's let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. There is footage of a dump truck driving through smashing though an airplane and then continuing to be smashed when it tried to drive through some concrete.
Jesse Jennings _"and the other is designed for flight. "_ Sure it is... but what does that have to do with the impact force of a 100+ ton object travelling hundreds of mph? _" let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. "_ This is total bullshit from people gullible enough to believe whatever the pilots for truth morons say. ..these are people who don't understand what VMO is. It's not a physical limit.
+Ian Pemberton so did the planes really cause those towers to crumble like that? The planes hit the top of the building and caused the foundations to crumble?? Really? Dang I need to re-think my whole life if that's the case!
It is incredible that an aluminum plane broke the steel beams of the best in history capable of withstanding more than 300 degrees, the thermite explosive makes no noise
They did though. BOTH AA11 & UA 175 VAPORIZED when they hit the WTC towers. I was in NYC on 9/11 as was my Aunt, and she personally witnessed AA 11's impact into the North Tower (WTC 1) from the Brooklyn Heights Promenade. I was further away (but also in Brooklyn) from Lower Manhattan and didn't see the impacts, but I felt both shockwaves, and heard the reverb echo from UA 175 hitting the South Tower (WTC 2) and it was INSANE like a thunderclap, BUT MUCH lower and rumbling. I was in the shower when AA 11 hit the North Tower (so I didn't hear anything because I was surrounded by the Tile of my bathroom and the door was closed), but I felt my building shake. I thought it was just the Subway passing underneath my building like it did multiple times daily, but no.
I'm with you. I'm an iron worker.. the building would still stand. They blew it up. Just like daddy tried 10 years before that.. bin ladin was fake. Just an excuse to invade the middle east for weapons of destruction that never existed the way it fell was in sync with controlled explosives.
+owieri people are so easily led. up is down - black is white ... if the government tells them so. Then they attack and insult people like us - for trying to wake them up. so sad.
It takes a lot of explosives to implode a building of steel, every 2 floors have to be cut. Simultaneously. Bars of 250 mm or 10 inches. Each floor section presenting hundred of columns, like a world of steel.
I wasn't in NYC, DC, or PA, I was just at work in a warehouse near Detroit. You don't really notice how used to certain noises you are until they're simply not there. Every day it's normal to hear airliners fly overhead constantly there, it's an approach to Detroit metro airport, but that day it was eerily silent and something felt very off about it, I just knew something was wrong. I didn't see what was going on until I got home from work since that warehouse didn't allow people in or out, and nobody really had radios or anything in there. Only thing in the sky was fighter jets, so high up you couldn't really hear them at all, just see the lights on them. It was so f*cked up seeing those people jump out of desperation live on tv, I'll never forget that day. It was also messed up when the east coast blackout hit soon after, that shit was crazy too.
I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.
I was 16 when this happened, during my 2nd Period Health Class Sophomore Year. I was in shock, had no idea what was going on, all assignments were cancelled and TVs were on showing what happened. Still didn’t know until I called my mom when I got home after school, my jaw hit the floor.
We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.
not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?
What an event... Every time I watch any video about the WTC attack I'm amazed that hundreds of people died in those planes when hit the buildings, people who knew they were about to die. RIP forever innocent victims of the greed for power, you'll never be forgotten.
Was the speed of the plane what allowed the wings to cut through steel? If so, then the simulation is believable if the plane was going that fast. If not, then the fact that the planes wings even made of aero space aluminum could hit steel and wings not break off, what? Some of these things make me ask questions about which I have no answer, but maybe someone does.
@mfitz1969 look up video "Evan Fairbanks WTC 9/11 footage". I see some of the plane come out and then a fireball. 6:40 min mark. I stated it went clean in.
@@MFitz12 there’s a core in the middle of the towers with the stairwell that stopped it. The rest of the building was mostly air. They were basically big tubes
That was really cool and graphic and at the same time so very sad to see what those people inside would have seen. I know they would not have known what happened. This video was extremely well done and thank you for taking us inside and see what happened. So many years later and it still breaks my heart. Amazing the technology we have.
This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.
@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.
It was dropped later to magnify the losses and exaggerate them. This is all a plan by the American government in order to convince the American people that they are in danger and spending on the army must be increased so that it can occupy and destroy countries.
It’s amazing you think the entire building could have collapsed like a controlled demolition from a few floors being destroyed the building was made to handle 5x the load it supported
Can u imagine being in the building. Looking out and seeing a big ass plane coming right at u. Seeing it blow through the building, dozens of people dying. And then just being stuck up there, unable to leave, eventually falling down with the collapse of the tower
You should have got an engineer to do it. They would have known that the plane is made from thin soft aluminium and the the building out of stick steel and concrete. Like trying to stab someone with tin foil. These scientists were Tom and Jerry cartoonists really, like when Tom makes a cat shaped hole in a brick wall.
Cell phone call quality has only diminished over the years. Cell phones are not sold to be high quality phones, but small computers. Long before that stage, they were much better quality. Try seeing if you know anyone still using a flip phone and compare the service with a Galaxy.
Jeffrey C NO PLANE hit the Pentagon it was a cruse missile !! The hole that was only shown briefly and only once showed a hole too small for a plane to fit in !! And NO plane parts !!!
Senior Frog LIAR!!!! Firstly missile don't leave exit holes and knock over light poles, idiot. Secondly, there was plenty of IDENTIFIABLE wreckage that aerospace experts have identified. We even have the flight data recorder as well as over 130 people witnessing the plane strike. On top of that the personal possessions and physical remains of EVERY passenger and crew member known to be on board, as well as radar evidence. Are you really that desperate to believe the conspiracy, or just so gullible you blindly believe everything you read on conspiracy websites?
Aluminium wings only cuts steel and concrete only in cartoons What speed would you have to throw your coke can to puncture your wall at home ! End of the discussion !
mike .D Stunning response, Mike. Stunning. There are a couple of little problems with your statements though. #1. No concrete used in the construction of the towers with the exception of floor slabs. Buildings of the day and still today are primarily built with concrete encased steel columns. Not so for the Towers. So...that one is not worth a shit. (lets move on) 2. Coke can through the wall at the house? Sure thing it would shoot through the wall like nothing if enough velocity if used. You know, enough momentum. Think of it this way...have you ever seen a 2X4 after a Tornado that has somehow embedded itself into rock? Or asphalt? Or a Tree? Or ...well you get the idea. So now, with your comments and my explanation as to how absolutely stupid your points were I can confidently state that NOW the discussion is over.
Mark Colquitt How much do you get paid to deny the facts of science and nature. Those towers could withstand 757's slamming into them all day. That's how they were built. All through the past with all it's false flags to believe anything the government or media says is the act of a fool
badbob85037 Are you wanting to know how much I get paid annually for my shill work or monthly? I can only answer that question legally, if asked questions that are specific. Those towers were built to withstand 757's slamming into them all day? WOW that is some tough buildings. I wonder if they were built with Ginsu knives and sham-wow's. But before I start spreading that all over the web, what do I tell people is my source? I can't tell them the truth. How would that sound? "Oh, I was told by some crazy fucker online who made it up off the top of his head! One of those conspiracy theorist guy's that thinks false flags are part of the military's normal operating strategies." You see? I can't tell them that. Help a shill out!! Now lastly about this "false flag" business. What other false flag operations have actually been done after the turn of last century? Help me out with this info and I really think we can stick it to the sumbitches. But I need YOUR help. Are you with me private badbob85037? LMFAO...haha man this is fun.
Mark Colquitt "Those towers were built to withstand 757's slamming into them all day" Those are the exact words said by the one who designed the buildings hours after they fell. Of course the next day he changed his tune and said fire caused the buildings to fall. If you believe what our government said happened that day first you toss everything you know on the laws of science and nature, believe in magic and time travel. The magic part is how do you get a 757 knocking 5 light poles out of the ground not putting a dent in any of them then vanish into the side of the building through a 8 foot hole in the wall 100 tons of aluminum with 2 17 ton titanium engines gone, but they ID'ed all but two of the victims. Yea right. An hour latter for the second time in history a passenger jet smashes into a small hole in the ground and POOF gone. Show me one other the history of the earth a plane crash and didn't leave bodies, gear, engines, tail section, over a large area. The time travel is all those cell phone calls. Five years age the airline industry made a big deal out of 'Now you can make a cell phone call while flying" when the years before that you couldn't make a cell phone call from 2,000 feet let alone 33 thousand. Those calls had to be made from a time machine traveling through the plane. LAST: When has the government been straight up with you giving you anything but lying bullshit. Any of it's over 2,000 agencies. Name one that would give you reason to believe anything they say. Nope ya can't do it so to believe our government in the first place is the act of a fool. So I will give you the benefit of the doughty and say you are not a fool so you must be a government troll. Do trolls ware those pointed little hats to hide their pointed little heads?
@@MFitz12 - Throw an egg against a concrete wall and the egg will go through the wall because of "kinetic energy"? Airplanes are like empty, thin aluminium cans. It doesn't matter how fast you shoot an empty, thin aluminium can against thick steel, it won't go through it. Even a bird can put a big dent in the thin nose of an airplane. And the wings of airplanes are especially flimsy. They would have ripped right off at impact against the huge steel beams and fallen down to the street. This video is pure BS. It reminds me of the "physics" demonstrated in episodes of Wiley E. Coyote and the Roadrunner.
@@TorMax9 - If the egg weighs 117 tons and is moving at 470 mph, then make the concrete wall a large bird cage instead and you will be closer. If you are going to load your argument at least don't make it so freakin' obvious. 🤦♂🤦♂
I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday. I was in Florida at the time on holiday with my family from the UK. We had literally just arrived at a Disney waterpark and were told to evacuate. On the radio there was a report of a "small plane going into the WTC". We went back to our villa and switched the TV. I literally could not believe what I was seeing. When the second plane hit the South Tower, I was stunned. It was like watching a movie, but the fact it was reality I was watching was horrifying and hard to grasp. By the time the second tower collapsed, I was in tears. We went out to eat that night and the US people were incredible. Their grit in the face of such a tragedy, their camaraderie and grace with us and their determination to see justice. What also haunts me is that literally an exact year before, I went to New York and had dinner in the beautiful "Windows on the World" restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower. I remember my Mum asking me to stand in the window for a photo, but I was too nervous to do so as I don't like heights. To think that so many people were trapped up on those high floors of the towers at those same windows with no option but to remain or jump is horrendous. Just terrifying and awful beyond belief. 9/11 is imprinted on my brain and will never leave me. My heart goes out to everyone who lost their lives, their loved ones and all of the survivors of that terrible, terrible day.
I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.
@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001) He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy
Very informative, I can't even begin to imagine the horror those people went through on that fateful day, I live in Connecticut and remember driving home just after the second plane hit the tower, and while driving east bound I84, there was a plane embanking like it was turning around, I was thinking to myself is this the next one as I was listening to the radio and just announced a third plane went missing, ( the one that crashed into the Pentagon,) I never felt so scared in all my life. We shall never forget what happened on that day.
@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely. are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath? btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.
In 2005, 4 years after the attack, the government's own National Institute of Standards and Technolegy issued it's report. It stated out of the 236 outer columns 33 were damaged leaving 86% undamaged. NIST estimated 6 to 8 out of 47 core columns were damaged leaving 85% intact and undamaged. That is what's known as Minimal Damage. They found no scientific reason why or how these two towers fell. They also found all materials used, welds,and bolts were above standards and no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees. NIST never tested for residue from explosives or accelerates. In 2008 Shyam Sunder of the NIST said about building 7 " The phenomenon that was saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building was really thermal expansion that occurs at lower temperatures". Science demands a clear path for structural mass to accelerate at the rate of gravity, except on 9/11. Just what is this lower temp. thermal expansion that allows free fall speed ignoring load bearing continuous vertical support, floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams, lateral crosses, diagonal bracing, tens of thousands of welds and bolts, interior walls and partitions, office contents, 1 1/2" through 12"cast iron pipe, electric conduit, and all the other utilities to fall at the speed of gravity. If this new 'science' is now a known fact wouldn't we want to condemn all high rise buildings in places like L.A. and Phoenix? And to think there are people that believe this crap.
_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_ Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there. *"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*
Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.
IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_ You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel.... in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.
We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.
You know, A huge problem with a lot of these recent comments is the fact that, they are just debating from partial knowledge. The planes were made of Aluminium, that is a FACT. The construction included Steel, that is a FACT. and the incident HAPPENED!! People be saying ""Plane made of Aluminium Sheet"" Sheet ? seriously? Do you even know what a Sheet looks and feels like ? The Plane would bend with the weight of the passengers itself, if it was a SHEET. Not only that, People be comparing 1mm of Aluminium with 40mm of steel saying Al will bend, which is TRUE. But they really don't consider the velocity of the body during the impact. In that case. I would suggest you to go back to school and learn the chapter "Collision" yet again !!
In conclusion: it appears that that particular 767 was made out of Japanese sword steel and that wall of the Trade Center was obviously made out of Play-Doh... NOT possible!
Steven Bee I think you are stretching the limits of credibility with that pop can vs solid wall of titanium Steven. What do you mean a solid wall? Is that solidly front to back or side to side. How far was that titanium wall solid for? Was it 12 feet thick solid or was it 4 miles thick solid? How fast do you think you can propel a pop can before it vaporizes from friction with air? How would you devise a plan to propel this can to the necessary velocity to penetrate this wall of unspecified thickness?
+Steven Bee Nobody is interested in your scientific gobeldygook Stepen. I've done years of internet reaserch and have made my findings public, proving that it was a false flag. You deflecting only serves to prove that your a paid shill, probably at the behest of the powerful Jews at the controls.
No Steven, the screen name you replied to was a sock puppet that duplicates other user's accounts. Maybe if you exercised a bit of due diligence by checking into the accounts of these cretins that call you names, you might just put these attacks into perspective.
This simulation is now 16+ years old now, done well by the engineers at Purdue University. FEA (Finite Element Analysis), CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), and a whole host of other simulation software have come a long way since then. I suspect now they could even model the individual people in their seats and what happened to their bodies, but I know no one would do that due to how distressing that would be to family and friends. If this simulation were done today, the detail would be incredible and very closely match all the videos of the day.
Who else randomly got this in their recommended?
Shut the fuck to please, it’s the most unoriginal comment ever
@@olindevos i was gonna type the exact same thing (up instead of to). tired of these idiots.
And who the fuck will give a like on this comment motherfuckers
Yo I'm getting so much hate lol. Didn't really think people who actually start hating for saying this. It's not that deep. And it is true as well🤣😂
@@olindevos uh... okay. It's not wrong to do it but I'm just stating facts aren't I
I have not seen this before now. My sister's office was where the nose of the plane went in. My solace is that she probably did not know what happened.
Thanks for a terrific animation.
Sorry to hear that amigo. Did they ever find anything of her? Or is she one of the 1109 people that are still "missing"?
@@Flupmeister1 she was identified through DNA 11 months later. Still miss her terribly.
Kurt Dietrich feels bad man hope you get better
Sorry for your loss...
Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.
It’s disturbing to think there were people in that plane, and people right there at their desks, that were either crushed or incinerated or both. The ones who died instantly were spared the horror, despair, injury and pain of those who survived, only to die in the collapse.
Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11.
It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors.
I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).
Imagine the ones sitting close to the windows and seeing the planes right before impact.
@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.
I composed music for this, premiered yesterday
There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images
I did,I lost my brother Kohn M Rigo at the WTC in NYC. He was working for Marsh in the self insured group at the time. I think about my brother John every day and still I miss him. FYI - I pray for all the folks murdered on 09:11 and their families and friends .☮️✝️☮️✝️☮️✝️
Marsh got hit hard that day. RIP to your brother John. 🌹
Why are these kids in the classroom with bush singing PLANE MUST HIT STEEL ? Coincidence? Rip Al the victim’s ❤️
Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are.
For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that
SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD.
They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured.
You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult.
Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct?
So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say .
MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG.
This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism.
⬇️
....................................
One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911.
The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001
The WTC broke ground in 1968.
And fell 33YRS later in 2001.
The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller.
He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001.
In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11.
The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC.
The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on
9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell.
The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test.
The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor.
6+3=9
8+3=11
1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS.
media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster.
(Good watch) 30 min .
WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914
07+28+19+14= 68.
WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939
09+01+19+39= 68.
RUSS/UKRAINE aka
WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022
02+24+20+22= 68.
6 + 3=9
8 + 3=11
The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s.
If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision.
ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11.
Revelation 9:11
Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit.
Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION.
Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION)
You'll find a book titled
TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA.
Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN.
I know it sounds batshit crazy.
BUT?
There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume.
The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin.
if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards
Take out the word ALAH it spells
I AM SATAN.
AILAM AHSATAN
MALIA NATASHA
There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan.
Luke 10:18 kjv
I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning.....
( Lightning, Fall from high )
Hebrew translation
Barac bama.
A FESTIVAL in Italy called
CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON.
NO OPINIONS
All facts.
You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF.
If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐
It’s crazy how far we’ve come with computers, nowadays people can make this simulation and it would look like real life
@@onumahobart8832 go home you are drunk
Y’all trippin, this is the best of the best technology of the time they couldn’t fake it
Except this is to fool you into believing the lies.
True
@@evangeffner1194 We know 9/11 was an inside job now, so they must indoctrinate the next generation.
Man, you know you're in a weird spot in life when you randomly end up here at 2:25 a.m. on a Monday morning.
This hit a bit too close to home haha (2:01 AM here)
wtf, it's 2.27am as I read this.
hahaha
4:15 am on a Monday as I type this. Missed it by a couple hours my bad
2:05 am hahaha
Ya gotta admit that computer programming was incredible. And it was 10 years old
Like the Original Architect said many times, it’s like a hole puncture into a screen, built with the capability withstand multiple 707 hits which were also wide body aircraft in their day‼️
yep that 2000 ton Hat Truss on the roof was designed to take care of that exterior lattice and 100 floors in the event of a wild strike
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.
@@user-jq7tc7qi5z John Lear was all over this state produced nonsense back in Jan 2008. Read his posted affidavit.
Thanks Alghorithym for this 14 year old video.
ikr
It's the 20th anniversary, so there will be a lot of interest, producing more ad revenue.
i was not even 1 when this was made, mad
Hey the same people behind covid did 911
Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.
Its hard to believe it's been almost 20 years since that happened
I know right
I know
@@richarda1568 i know
indeed
Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.
What's crazy is how this was produced and uploaded to fledgling CZcams only 5 years and change after the event. By comparison, 5 years ago was 2018.
So, the aluminum wings cut through the outer steel columns like butter.
There were just explosions, no planes
On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...
I don’t know if this simulation took into account the explosives plated in the building.
@@dylandavidson1709 I mean, it's an easy thing to miss.
@@livestock9722 yeah...not too much to care about
Oh gosh! Old Google Earth rendering! I remember back when none of the buildings had textures or details
Ik, how far we have come hey
I remember when there were no buildings
I didn't even realize it changed, I thought Google earth still looks like this.
We’re all nerds confirmed
@@DamienAlexander ah I think these days they just use scans of buildings like in Google Maps.
I was a tourist that day visiting NYC - my third time there at the time. I really wanted to go to the top of the twin towers and we had tried to go the previous weekend but it was full. We were supposed to go on tuesday but my family decided last minute we would go to empire state instead and visit the WTC later in the day. While we were getting ready to head out that tuesday morning, we all found ourselves glued to the TV in our hotel watching the horrible images. What a scary time, I was just 13 and couldn't believe it was real.
*Bla bla bla*
bullshit
Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going.
Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?
@@thomas-thequestionableseri1095 Have you ever been to NYC? Yeah, you can’t see the WTC from everywhere in the city.
The amount of people saying something like this is just unbelievable, literally
Time flies. Can't believe it was 22 years ago. It feels like it happened 19 years ago.
feels more like last week
I love how people are so possessed by the delusion that airplane wings are “flimsy” or “paper thin.” Airplane wings are extremely strong and can support several times the plane’s weight. I don’t know the rating of 767 wings, but some plane wings are rated at 12 times the plane’s weight. Have you seen a stress test? The wings can bend fully vertical and they don’t break.
Also this notion that planes are built like soda cans? The aluminum they use is usually 6061 or 7075. Both of them are high quality and very very strong, and are also, you know, NOT the only metals they use… like, they have titanium and steel parts too, guys.
Planes are friggin strong.
Sorry I have to disagree with you, planes are not built to be strong they are built to be lightweight
@@jimmoravec1326 you “disagree,” eh? I guess that means the factual information means nothing.
@@Moakmeister
What are you basing your facts on ?
@@jimmoravec1326 the engineers who built the planes? Lol
@@Moakmeister
They built the planes stronger than steel and concrete ?
Oh yes I forgot they are magic planes, never mind
I can't imagine sitting in a cubicle when that plane came inside. RIP and God bless all affected. 20 years today.
Imagine having a window view.
There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.
Omg I could only imagine how terrify all the workers in that building had suffered. It just so sad and all these people didn’t have to die like this.
@@tiagodembo7488 alive and lying.
@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology.
The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.
who else got this in their recommended feed today on 9/11?
same
Desert Gecko yup
9/16
same... creepy YT tryna take attention away froom Hunter Biden stuff
Building 7 mr pullit egh!.
The simulation of the crash is impressive. How sad what happened, not only because of the loss of life, but also because of the demolition of the towers. I was 5 years old when it happened, so I don't remember the attack, but I know we were all glued to watching the television. Greetings from Argentina.
My mom is have 13 years old with is passed this tragedy
This is a cartoon. Do more research.
@@greatbriton8425 "This is a cartoon. Do more research." This is a physically accurate analysis of the events. Do even a tiny bit of research.
@@rodshop5897 🤣🤣🤣
@@rodshop5897 You don't even understand basic physics. How??
Hard to agree. Although plane brought a huge speed, this simulation portraits the collision like a knife cutting butter.
it's counterintuitive but that's how it was, ie: foam can cut a hole through a thick high durability carbon fiber panel at the right speed, it took real tests to convince many NASA engineers that it was a thing. When you think of foam, you think anything but it being something so strong to go through one of the strongest materials. Momentum changes things drastically, in the end it's all about energy vs time distributing through materials.
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shakes while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it a computer animation is, same like this video. and this means government of USA was involved and is guilty
@@mindblow7617 Good analogy. To understand what foam at high speed can do, one only needs to remember the Columbia disaster. A piece of foam broke off the center tank and struck the shuttle wing putting a hole through the toughest part of the shuttle and causing it to disintegrate on reentry.
Imagine what it would look like 14 years later with today's simulation?
I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?
It would look like Real Life.... So was 14 years ago actually nothing more than a computer game created 28 years in the future?
@@GunnerRDS ah yes i also think modern games are indistinguishable from reality 🤦♀️
Its a simplified physics model. It could have looked way better allready back than.
60fps
Not trying to be funny at all, but after 911 I always thought that if I worked in a sky scraper I would have a parachute under my desk.
LOL. You're not the only one who's had that thought.
even living in 15 floor apartement i will prepare it, due unpredrict earthquake can be happen amytime
You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.
Agree tawnku! Rope another options, but it has possibility some people may use it too
Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.
But in real life, birds will crush a nose cone, yet they want us to believe these steel beam were taken out. Smh
A piece of pine straw can pierce a 2x4 in a tornado. The fact that you don’t understand velocity doesn’t defeat reality
Kinda alarming how much 9/11 content I'm getting recommended recently🌚
considering it was just 9/11, its not that alarming. Makes sense really
ikr??
No... I'm sorry, but in no way do I buy this. Aluminium that has been completely obliterated and destroyed from the impact cannot slice and cut through solid steel like that.
Yeah, because jet airplanes are built entirely from aluminum... :D
@@MrKredski A Boeing 767 is made primarily of Aluminium and composite materials.
Speed = kinetic energy
@@Nobodyelsehasthishandle - all the internal structure as well?
@@MrKredski except the landing gear, yes. Do your research.
Man...I was only 8 years old when this happened. What a scary day that was as a former New Yorker.
Me also 1993😅
@@anandjiya same 50 miles north of the City sitting in my 3rd grade classroom
94 from California. This day will not be forgotten
I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.
@@mchapman132 Wow.
An aluminum plane going through massive steel beams? How
Simple answer: speed
A magnum handgun bullet can go through a brick wall .
Kinetic energy
@@user-yp7rn6tb2ta magnum handgun bullet is not made out of aluminum
They were not "massive", they were 4in on the lower floors and 0.25in on the higher ones
@@Nairolf7 Injected or smoked?
No way those wings went straight through those steal beams and columns especially the tail wings
In a tornado, a paper straw was found impaled in an oak tree. With speed, velocity, momentum, it is possible. Physics.
consider the fact a boeing 767 can travel between 500-600mph. this video helps show what happens to a skyscraper when something that size going that speed crashes into it. regardless of conspiracies of who was actually behind the attack, the planes flying into the buildings are what destroyed them
At the speed they pretend an airplane hit, the wings would first be torn from the body at sea level air density. And second when an object moves above 400 mph hits a solid object it atomizes and turns to dust.
The image of the building so perfectly done was created with explosives. It even shows the shape of the engines. It's more like a cartoon than reality.
@@SVRANDGLD - Go back in your mother’s basement, you sound idiotic.
And yet ... they did !
Before 9/11 tech magazines theorized a terror attack would consist of a Boeing 747 being flown into a nuclear power plant.
the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened.
The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes.
Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 hold on you don’t believe they were planes?
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?
@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 there are literally videos of the planes crashing into the towers.
In 2020, why is this in my reccommended?
The 19th anniversary is next week so that's probably why.
Sterling Gaddis so you never forget
@@jeyDsixx18 this better not happen again damnit
Oh God
Because pentagon partnered with google and wants people to stop believing that they did 9/11, by showing us these "simulations".
Imagine going to work that day only to find yourself locked in a decision to either be burned alive, suffocate until you died, OR still alive but barely able to breathe until the weight of the collapsing building crushed you, OR jump in which you felt like you were on the world's scariest rollercoaster going down for about 4 seconds before being hit with the most pain you've ever felt in your life for a brief one second, until you were dead. For 2,977 people, the end of the world came that day.
Blame our government they did this to us
This is 16 years old and new to me. I'm 'glad' to see it. I have often wondered if there was any educated guess as to how things happened inside the building as the plane hit. Amazing what technology can do. I understand much better now how and why the buildings fell; I can see that it was a death blow to the buildings from the beginning. It seems that the people on the planes were killed immediately by the incredible impact, thankfully. Also that the people working on those immediate floors never knew what happened.
Ясно видно,что сердцевина здания,стальные опорные балки, мало пострадали. Здание не могло обрушиться из-за самолётов. Кроме того здание WTC 7 тоже обрушилось,но самолёты туда не попали
@@user-yg7zn6cy8oбесполезно объяснять. У них другой менталитет) они более подвержены массовой истерии и доверия к дядям с погонами. А мы наоборот никогда дядям не верим)
Мне как инженеру по образованию очевидно, что самолёт из алюминия даже на скорости в 500+ км в час не способен сложить это здание пополам. Сердцевина максимум погнута но не порвана. И авиационный керосин не способен гореть с такой продолжительностью и температурой при дефиците кислорода, чтобы расплавить стальные колонны.
Там инженеры тоже не дураки проектировали. Здание было рассчитано и под самолёт и под мощный пожар. Не было рассчитано оно только под систематический подрыв силовых элементов по площади) а и ещё, если бы верхушка даже и рухнула, то рухнула вбок, в сторону гле самолёт врезался, так как там больше топлива горит и больше погнуто колонн, и скорее всего частично разрушив под собой этажи, она бы рухнула под углом на город, но уж точно не прямо вниз как при инженерном сносе)
Самое доверчивый народ это американцы. ))
“A high quality physically accurate visualization”
Upper limit 240p...
The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.
240p was the upper limit for YT in 2007. True dat.
Welcome to 2007
Bruh it was made in 2007 💀
Trash Millenial Outing
Damn this animation is pretty good for 13 years ago
da foocha they had ray tracing and everything.
Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity!
So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate.
p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....
@@anthonywilliams7052
how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too.
The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too.
We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office.
Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back.
Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender".
p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.
@@anthonywilliams7052
well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce).
I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them.
The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes.
Has this theory ever been substantiated?
I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact.
The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names.
But I can't find any such experiment.
So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities.
Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable.
That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies.
The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further.
Why not? There's no proof of the other theory.
So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true.
Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory?
I can't and I haven't and I've looked.
If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too.
But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program.
It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too.
However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched.
That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool.
And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes.
I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day.
It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves.
The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface.
Figures don't lie but liars can figure.
Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.
Did anyone else get recommended this 16 years later?
👍
It's absolutely impossible to even try to imagine what passengers must have felt just before their plane crashed into buildings.
you mean the Arab Pilots maybe, but the passengers didnt know anything. The Arab Pilots were actually very brave soldiers.
@@baloopa-sv9xr ...too brave
Cool. Now do a simulation of Epstein not killing himself.
Why don't you act it out yourself and see how it goes?
@@MFitz12 I did. It worked. Im dead
You, sir, rule!
I farted
Elan Danks thanks Elan
The plane, that is virtually made of aluminum, hits the second tower and cuts through a steel and concrete building, in tact, like a knife through butter, no wing or tail damage, but the plane that hits the Pentagon virtually disappears, engines and all, wings collapse, engines disintegrate, no seats, luggage, just disappears. You can't have it both ways and besides, both scenarios defy the laws of physics !
+bass man why do you copy and paste truther bullshit word for word? are you too fucked up to say shit in your own words?
+bass man well said.
If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy?
Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know.
If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it.
Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911.
I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere.
Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff.
Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty
Angela Leggerio
Debris was falling faster than the collapse at the speed of gravity dumb dipshit sheep. Wake up.
i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??
One thing that most analysts neglect to include in the total collapse of the towers is that at the top of each tower was a 30 foot thick solid slab of formed concrete used as a ballast to combat swaying in the wind. It had so much mass that moving it back and forth was nearly impossible. However, once put into downward motion from the collapse of just one weakened floor, the mass of concrete would have nothing to stop it. The second plane was larger and weakened a few floors at a slightly lower level and so that building collapsed much faster. So, the ingenious feature to help stabilize the building in intense winds also helped to hasten its total collapse.
I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.
It’s crazy how this used to be state of the art
Well the analysis still is but video quality was the best allowed by CZcams at the time.
Word of warning ...if you start listening to this video with head phones ....lower the sound quickly!!
Paws n Claws thx
14 years ago: state of the art
Now: this game looks like crap
Funny how we both ended up here today
@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. CZcams was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.
This needs to be simulated on Beam.NG drive
The first Matrix movie is from 1999, just saying...
@@OrlandoMGarcia and while they are at it also see what happens when that stunt bus crashes into it at full speed
22 years later and I still remember it like it was yesterday. We have not forgotten.
@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.
@@faithismespeaks6848 Islam didn’t commit 9/11. Terrorists did.
Vietnam or Iraq will never forget you're crimes against their humanity.
@@WiseFidelista, At least you get it, most sheeple still don't get it after we attacked 2 countries that had nothing to do with 9-11.
"State of the art annimation system". Looks like it was made on a damned Commodore 64 in 1977
What do you expect? Its an early 2000s simulation software running on windows xp do you expect the plane to fly through your damn screen?
@@Nickrulz4u
It's kind of funny to watch kids who can't understand today's technology didn't exist 16 years ago.
@@timshea4279 yeah for real
@@Nickrulz4u 👍
Here because it's 9\11. My condolences goes to the people who were involved in this tragic event 🤍🙏
The people on those floors where the planes hit had no chance may God Rest their souls.
Sadly those people prolly had the most painless experience that day compared to the rest of floors above.
And the gutless pigs who took all those innocent people's lives rot in hell.
They were spared the pain, and fear. RIP
Amazingly a few survived the impact in tower 2. Absolutely amazing and terrifying story. It's in the new doc on hulu/national geographic.
One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.
Were we actually this antiquated in CGI, 16 years ago? This "top of the line" simulation looks like something out of the 1960's, compared to now.
Uncle sam just want oil😂
Day so broke ($34T broke) day must now steal like any bandit would lol
The day that three buildings collapsed in the exact same way as each other after being hit by two planes.
No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.
@@MFitz12 why waste your time trying to educate someone that is clearly a moron??
you are just too dumb to understand, so you're clinging to stupid theories :D
Demolition job all rigged prior to the day
mm hmmm interesting.
If we had camera phones back then we would of got to see the inside view of this tragic
That would be absolutely horrific for any family members of the people that lost their life's.
@@randomsimpsonsquotes6033 false. it would present closure.
Um pretty sure the phones would incinerate so there wouldn’t be any footage
I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked.
A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited.
It is horrifying.
However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).
@@marykathryn4713 the can go live on the phone so there would be footage
I wonder how they would simulate a 757 flying into the pentagon only leaving a eighty foot wide entry?
Yeah, and no airline debris
plus how all surveilance camera's around the pentagon went down at that exact moment, odd!!!
The plane went into the building through all those pillars like a knife through a brick of butter. And the wings cut off the pillars? Kinda unreal.
It is!!!
so we find that simulated aluminum can cut through simulated steel beams....hmmm, but what about real ones?
@@RoverIAC steel would win
ah yes. it was supposed to bounce off and plough into ground, do you realize how much power and momentum a boeing will have at that speed?
You have to consider the energies at those speeds.
As seen repeatedly in tornado and hurricane damage, even small, light-weight materials can do amazing things when given enough energy and velocity.
They forgot to simulate C4 Bombs explosions in the basement 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
.. and nano thermate shape charges. Nano thermate was discovered in the dust.
@@buttafan4010 Who says, a RW nut job? Conclusion: There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles that you would expect to see from a thermite burn. They say the red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon-steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. And there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, so the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.
@@douglasross594 Can you find specific faults with Harrit's scientific paper? Who are the THEY you are referring to ... N.I.S.T.? NIST did not test for accelerants because they said there were no loud explosions. Thermate does not make loud explosions. And stop calling it thermite. It was not thermite. It was nano thermate; basically thermite + sulfur that has been weaponized. So there was no arson investigation as mandated by NYC fire regulations. I called several NYC fire investigators, and some from other major cities, and they all said that they do not "pull" buildings ... as Larry Silverstein stated on video. Are you a person who conflates religious and national myths such as those outlined for the 9/!! Commission members before their first meeting by Philip Zelikow. Why would side with the Mossad?
Israel did !X/X!
Just like the old rose said in Titanic movie..in the beginning scenes ....
Thanks for your scientific explaination but the experience of it was much different
Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.
It's sad to know whoever was above the plane crash were stuck & unable to get down :(
Inside
@@alexramirez5862 There were no planes Alex.
@@onumahobart8832
no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all.
If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny.
We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery.
It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.
I can't even visualize one last frame that captured by someone's eye that is directly in front of the plane nose.
So it did not explain how everything top to bottom was pulverized in all three buildings, and on the way down. Controlled demo has trouble doing it without effecting complete pulverization.
Very simple. Once the remaining steel structure was softened by the subsequent fires, the combined weight of the floors above the compromised areas caused them to yield. Once that momentum began, each succeeding floor of concrete was pulverized outward and downward into the next floor. Steel columns were no match to hundreds of millions of pounds of concrete (each building was estimated at 1 BILLION pounds each above the street) and collapsed outward and downward as well. Those huge plumes of "smoke" that billowed out with the collapse were in fact pulverized concrete particles...extremely bad for one's health. No demolition of any kind was used or needed. Sheer physics did this.
@@kurtfrancis4621 OK then why do controlled demolitions fail miserably sometimes? And explain the 3rd Building, which was not hit...? Building fire? There are many failed controlled demolitions. Believe what you wish.
Of, and where did the molten steel come from? Jet fuel is basically kerosene. One can easily see most flashed off in a matter of seconds outside of the building.
@@ericmuetterties1984 You'll get crickets on that one. But physics, to many of these internet professionals, has diesel fuel fires vapourizing titanium.
@@livestock9722 Certainly questionable why there was molten steel in the basement for months. In fact the molten metal was a huge hinderance to cleanup. Still trying to figure out how to melt steel with diesel fuel ;-) Most don't realize Jet A is diesel. Also most of the fuel was burned immediately in a visible fireball. Oh well... The truth is too hard to swallow.
@@ericmuetterties1984 The whole thing continues to be questionable. Especially over 1 billion in precious metals that went missing from WTC7 underground vaults, that happened to fall in on itself so precisely, all by it's lonesome. Maybe it was sad...
The only thing I find funny about this (from a 2021 standpoint) is how he keeps reiterating that it's a state of the art animation system. My, we've come a long way.
Edit: how are there 62 replies on this thing already
This shit must have been a fucking bitch to render/simulate.
We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.
Only thing...it isn't and it wasn't, not even back then, those are false statements.
@@midsizesedan7620 Maybe take a trip south of the wall and touch some grass :]
@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims
But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics
Algorithm: “It has been 14 years. He’s ready now”
Same here
I: Yes
And click in the video.
its still too soon.
right? :(
This is the first and last time in history that an aluminium plane (wings, tail section and fuselage) passed effortlessly through reinforced concrete and steel girders. Someone is gonna have to rewrite the laws of physics. ‘To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction’
I thought much the same but I struggle to get any more information. Can you explain more of what you mean as to the result please. thanks
@@ellebarratt5522 These buildings were engineered to withstand this exact scenario.
@@lovesilk1WTC engineer told they expected an airplane impact but not with full speed
Absolutely correct. It's simple physics that people don't get....How the 'phantom' jet was projected? Lord knows!
Building 7 fell at free fall acceleration through the path of greatest resistance and was not hit by an aeroplane . Newton's 3rd law of motion apparently took the day off. Obvious controlled demolition.
Wauw this definitely explains the "lava/foundry" like molten steel on ground zero...
🤣🤣👍🏻
Reminds me of the bit in Titanic, when old Rose watches the CG video of the ship sinking and says "the experience of it was somewhat different."
Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...
@@bacchantedryad So you ran your own simulation and got similar results?
No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.
No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I have always wondered why they both fell the way they did. Seriously, I would like an answer for that.
Try to google "how buckling contributed to WTC collapse".
@@curiouscat8457 thank you.
The demolitions were placed perfectly by demo experts. Did you know that the chief of security until 9-11-01 was Marvin Bush, George bush's little brother? YES george bushs brother ran the WTC SECURIITY and his contract ended 9-10-2001...
And how did building seven pancake too when it wasn't even hit? Huh? Call me paranoid but I want an answer to that question. Come on! Answer!
@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!
And this shows what a lot of people sadly do not understand. Sure, jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, but the debris of the plane knocking out so many of them weakened that section so much that, between the weight of the upper floors and the heat, the rest of the beams buckled and the upper-floors collapsed, essentially pancaking the building all the way down. A simple game of Jenga will teach you this stuff.
And what about building 7?
@@TheStrangeKage That one is unexplainable. In my opinion, the fire marshal and the city probably deemed it too expensive to repair (cheaper to rebuild), so they imploded it and just lumped it in with the other buildings as a loss.
@IAmNeomic do.ypu understand what it takes to rig a building day of during a pandemic to be a perfect execution? (Video of my 911 experience, dropping tomorrow) I was right by building 7
What about the plane hitting near the top but many ,many floors below collapsed like a controlled demolition
There was no way those buildings were gonna stay standing after that much damage. Common sense
I still believe that it is impossible to completely bring the whole buildings down, no matter what.
I agree, especially in that manner. I really wanted to see an analysis of everything provided, how hot the beams would have been at the core for it to completely fold in on itself. I would think hot steel beams would just bend and if anything maybe it would come down at an angle not just completely disintegrate straight down..
especially when other planes hit other building before and never took them down. also buildings burned for hours and days and still never fell. these buildings fell as like it was with controlled demolition. just look it up on youtube, it's all there to see.
Did you know Osama was actually a structural engineer. Since the building was made out of steel beams with very little concrete, the steel does not have to melt to collapse, once it gets hot because of the fires, the weight above it will make the columns bend. This will cause all the weight above to come down and sort of form a domino effect. Every time a floor falls the total weight that's falling gets bigger, which caused what seemed like a controlled collapse.
The attack on the WTC also caused a giant change in skyscraper design, it is the main reason that these kinds of buildings are mostly made out of concrete centers at least
@@NFSGamerful we have seen many buildings burning for hours yet didn't fell, also can you explain why second tower which was hit fell before the first one if burning jet fuel was the reason for core collapse? Tower 1 went down after 45 minutes of burning. And also explain how WC 5 fell which was a bit away from WC 1 and 2 while the building just close by remained intact?
Only fools will believe this shit.
And btw OBL was not a architect or construction expert. He was millionaire who just inherited the construction business from his father. And his education was in economics and business administration. All the billionaire send their kids for same rather then some technical fields as they know their kids has to run the business, for technicalities they can hire cheap labour...
@@Spooferish, as we havbe seen many buildings fall after burning. Just ready the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation report by yourself. WTC 5 didn't fall but WTC 7. There are several investigations about WTC 7 too.
It is important to read them yourself and not blindly follow the opinion of some CZcamsrs.
Most of them lie or leave out many details from the official investigation to make their story sound believable.
For example, *_none_* of the WTC buildings remained really intact. All of them were badly damaged, most of them so bad that they couldn't be repaired.
Omg so true! One aluminium plane can definitely cut through 47 steel columns. If you don't believe then take some baking foil and fold it in half to make it stronger then cut a steel spoon in half. It works!!! my spoon even caught fire from the vicious impact of the super strong baking foil. I hate my science teacher he lied to me because aluminium is way stronger than steel.
+Blu bell You think a plane weighing over 100 tons....travelling 500 mph is like some baking foil? lol
+Blu bell yeah! A 100,000 lb airplane traveling 500mph would just splat on the side!
Ian Pemberton One is designed to take the impact of a couple airliners. and the other is designed for flight. Secondly the supposed commercial aircraft couldnt reach its highest speed which is mid 400's let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. There is footage of a dump truck driving through smashing though an airplane and then continuing to be smashed when it tried to drive through some concrete.
Jesse Jennings
_"and the other is designed for flight. "_
Sure it is... but what does that have to do with the impact force of a 100+ ton object travelling hundreds of mph?
_" let alone surpass is capability so close to sea level. "_
This is total bullshit from people gullible enough to believe whatever the pilots for truth morons say. ..these are people who don't understand what VMO is. It's not a physical limit.
+Ian Pemberton so did the planes really cause those towers to crumble like that? The planes hit the top of the building and caused the foundations to crumble?? Really? Dang I need to re-think my whole life if that's the case!
It is incredible that an aluminum plane broke the steel beams of the best in history capable of withstanding more than 300 degrees, the thermite explosive makes no noise
Have MythBusters explored this topic?
Don’t believe wings have the ability to cut steel or concrete no matter how fast they are going. An impossible thought.
They did though. BOTH AA11 & UA 175 VAPORIZED when they hit the WTC towers. I was in NYC on 9/11 as was my Aunt, and she personally witnessed AA 11's impact into the North Tower (WTC 1) from the Brooklyn Heights Promenade. I was further away (but also in Brooklyn) from Lower Manhattan and didn't see the impacts, but I felt both shockwaves, and heard the reverb echo from UA 175 hitting the South Tower (WTC 2) and it was INSANE like a thunderclap, BUT MUCH lower and rumbling. I was in the shower when AA 11 hit the North Tower (so I didn't hear anything because I was surrounded by the Tile of my bathroom and the door was closed), but I felt my building shake. I thought it was just the Subway passing underneath my building like it did multiple times daily, but no.
I'm with you. I'm an iron worker.. the building would still stand. They blew it up. Just like daddy tried 10 years before that.. bin ladin was fake. Just an excuse to invade the middle east for weapons of destruction that never existed the way it fell was in sync with controlled explosives.
Who would have thought that aluminum could be so destructive?
It wasn’t. Those buildings were bombed from within. You can thank George w Bush.
It's like when you see a 2X4 going through brick during a tornado- velocity and force.
@@rowlandloewen5300 they werent can you explain your reasoning?
@@uuproverlord8324 thermite in the air and molten metal pools.
New construction methods are utilizing Saudi Arabia passport bindings instead of steel for strength.
aluminum wont cut steel
Carolyn Nigro exactly! i wonder why it even got inside the building, because aluminum won't cut glass either
+owieri
people are so easily led.
up is down - black is white ... if the government tells them so.
Then they attack and insult people like us - for trying to wake them up.
so sad.
The building was concrete. Also if you have any understanding of physics, you would know the plane did hit the tower. Stop trying to get attention.
The building yea.. But not the frame. Stop getting attention.
Vinh Trinh It didn't cut steel. The force of the plane snapped the frame.
The wing of a plane Absolutely will NOT Slice through STEEL BEAMS and manage to go through the Other side of the Building... This is ABSURD...
It takes a lot of explosives to implode a building of steel, every 2 floors have to be cut. Simultaneously. Bars of 250 mm or 10 inches. Each floor section presenting hundred of columns, like a world of steel.
it doesn't take any explosives at all. Just a $hit load of weight and gravity and something like fire to weaken the steel enough to get it started.
@@pacman3556 You believe in whatever you want pall, just try it in 10 inchs of steel.
@@FernandoVisserCedrola I believe facts. Something you clearly don't have.
@@pacman3556 enjoy something called cognitive dissonance, when the system made you believe instead of analyze.
I wasn't in NYC, DC, or PA, I was just at work in a warehouse near Detroit. You don't really notice how used to certain noises you are until they're simply not there. Every day it's normal to hear airliners fly overhead constantly there, it's an approach to Detroit metro airport, but that day it was eerily silent and something felt very off about it, I just knew something was wrong. I didn't see what was going on until I got home from work since that warehouse didn't allow people in or out, and nobody really had radios or anything in there. Only thing in the sky was fighter jets, so high up you couldn't really hear them at all, just see the lights on them. It was so f*cked up seeing those people jump out of desperation live on tv, I'll never forget that day. It was also messed up when the east coast blackout hit soon after, that shit was crazy too.
911 in NYC taped a call of a man calling FDNY .
THEY put it on CZcams.
He was on the 86th floor..or above it..😢
CZcams later took it off
Fart
I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.
@@trxtech3010 Bout as funny as my foot up your ass eh.
@@trxtech3010 you’re a horrible person.
I was 16 when this happened, during my 2nd Period Health Class Sophomore Year. I was in shock, had no idea what was going on, all assignments were cancelled and TVs were on showing what happened. Still didn’t know until I called my mom when I got home after school, my jaw hit the floor.
We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.
Was made to shock.
@It doesn’t matter What your name is 👍
So the word wins the focking patriot act.
not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?
What an event... Every time I watch any video about the WTC attack I'm amazed that hundreds of people died in those planes when hit the buildings, people who knew they were about to die.
RIP forever innocent victims of the greed for power, you'll never be forgotten.
Was the speed of the plane what allowed the wings to cut through steel? If so, then the simulation is believable if the plane was going that fast. If not, then the fact that the planes wings even made of aero space aluminum could hit steel and wings not break off, what? Some of these things make me ask questions about which I have no answer, but maybe someone does.
At 180 mph probably minimal penetration. At 470 mph (the velocity used for this model) it is not a problem.
Ya. I watched real footage and the plane goes clean in. Super weird.
@@Goldrefinedthrufire - Does the plane come clean out?
No?
Then what happened to it?
@mfitz1969 look up video "Evan Fairbanks WTC 9/11 footage". I see some of the plane come out and then a fireball. 6:40 min mark. I stated it went clean in.
@@MFitz12 there’s a core in the middle of the towers with the stairwell that stopped it. The rest of the building was mostly air. They were basically big tubes
That was really cool and graphic and at the same time so very sad to see what those people inside would have seen. I know they would not have known what happened. This video was extremely well done and thank you for taking us inside and see what happened. So many years later and it still breaks my heart. Amazing the technology we have.
This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.
tower 7
@TrueHelp7 already debunked. Why don't you mention the zombies or the lasers?
@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.
@@vyros.3234 ignore him, just another one of those again
"Thank you for that fine forensic analysis, Mr Bodine. Of course, the exprerience of it... was somewhat different."
Good reference
Somewhat untrue
It’s amazing that the buildings stood as long as they did after impact
It was dropped later to magnify the losses and exaggerate them. This is all a plan by the American government in order to convince the American people that they are in danger and spending on the army must be increased so that it can occupy and destroy countries.
It’s amazing you think the entire building could have collapsed like a controlled demolition from a few floors being destroyed the building was made to handle 5x the load it supported
@@legittshittful lol idiot
@@legittshittful It was destroyed by explosives that hit the foundation
Are you serious no building has ever collapse from fire especially the building was only on fire for 1 hour
But a jet will fail if a bird flies into the propeller
😂
See how a tiny thing can do massive damage when crashing in high speed?
What's your point?
“But a *jet* will fail if a bird flies into the *propeller”*
ok
My God, those poor people on those floors didn’t have a chance. May they rest in peace.
What about the people on the plane ? Everyone’s mentioning the people in the towers but not the people on the planes .
@@OhitzHurr.x_x what about the 60 steel workers who died building the WTC in the 70'? nobody talks about them..
What about the people who died manufacturing the steel for the WTC? Nobody talks about them...
Can u imagine being in the building. Looking out and seeing a big ass plane coming right at u. Seeing it blow through the building, dozens of people dying. And then just being stuck up there, unable to leave, eventually falling down with the collapse of the tower
yeah its crazy like, yoou know you cant run you just watch the plane and it either obliterates you or push you out the other side of the tower
it is terrible... except that there were no planes! It is one big lie. There were just explosions!
shut up you idiot
People disintegrated so fast and the heat was so much that pain wouldn't occur
Delusional...now you know what being delusional means...or do you? Of course not, when delusional it's you against the world.
man, at first I thought "Holy hell, this is a really bad video quality" then i saw when it was posted... Holy S***...
You should have got an engineer to do it. They would have known that the plane is made from thin soft aluminium and the the building out of stick steel and concrete. Like trying to stab someone with tin foil. These scientists were Tom and Jerry cartoonists really, like when Tom makes a cat shaped hole in a brick wall.
that plane would not have gone through all those beams lol are you high
are you serious , It did worse to a fortified pentagon
Cell phone call quality has only diminished over the years. Cell phones are not sold to be high quality phones, but small computers. Long before that stage, they were much better quality. Try seeing if you know anyone still using a flip phone and compare the service with a Galaxy.
Jeffrey C NO PLANE hit the Pentagon it was a cruse missile !! The hole that was only shown briefly and only once showed a hole too small for a plane to fit in !! And NO plane parts !!!
Senior Frog LIAR!!!! Firstly missile don't leave exit holes and knock over light poles, idiot. Secondly, there was plenty of IDENTIFIABLE wreckage that aerospace experts have identified. We even have the flight data recorder as well as over 130 people witnessing the plane strike. On top of that the personal possessions and physical remains of EVERY passenger and crew member known to be on board, as well as radar evidence. Are you really that desperate to believe the conspiracy, or just so gullible you blindly believe everything you read on conspiracy websites?
Jevin Denison Ok moron, make up your own physics if it makes you feel better. I suppose water can't slice through steel either right?
Aluminium wings only cuts steel and concrete only in cartoons
What speed would you have to throw your coke can to puncture your wall at home ! End of the discussion !
mike .D Stunning response, Mike. Stunning. There are a couple of little problems with your statements though. #1. No concrete used in the construction of the towers with the exception of floor slabs. Buildings of the day and still today are primarily built with concrete encased steel columns. Not so for the Towers. So...that one is not worth a shit. (lets move on)
2. Coke can through the wall at the house? Sure thing it would shoot through the wall like nothing if enough velocity if used. You know, enough momentum. Think of it this way...have you ever seen a 2X4 after a Tornado that has somehow embedded itself into rock? Or asphalt? Or a Tree? Or ...well you get the idea. So now, with your comments and my explanation as to how absolutely stupid your points were I can confidently state that NOW the discussion is over.
Mark Colquitt How much do you get paid to deny the facts of science and nature. Those towers could withstand 757's slamming into them all day. That's how they were built. All through the past with all it's false flags to believe anything the government or media says is the act of a fool
badbob85037
Are you wanting to know how much I get paid annually for my shill work or monthly? I can only answer that question legally, if asked questions that are specific.
Those towers were built to withstand 757's slamming into them all day? WOW that is some tough buildings. I wonder if they were built with Ginsu knives and sham-wow's. But before I start spreading that all over the web, what do I tell people is my source? I can't tell them the truth. How would that sound? "Oh, I was told by some crazy fucker online who made it up off the top of his head! One of those conspiracy theorist guy's that thinks false flags are part of the military's normal operating strategies."
You see? I can't tell them that. Help a shill out!!
Now lastly about this "false flag" business.
What other false flag operations have actually been done after the turn of last century? Help me out with this info and I really think we can stick it to the sumbitches. But I need YOUR help. Are you with me private badbob85037?
LMFAO...haha man this is fun.
badbob85037 of course they could not ! One must really be too stupid to believe that. The laws of physics please...
Mark Colquitt "Those towers were built to withstand 757's slamming into them all day" Those are the exact words said by the one who designed the buildings hours after they fell. Of course the next day he changed his tune and said fire caused the buildings to fall. If you believe what our government said happened that day first you toss everything you know on the laws of science and nature, believe in magic and time travel. The magic part is how do you get a 757 knocking 5 light poles out of the ground not putting a dent in any of them then vanish into the side of the building through a 8 foot hole in the wall 100 tons of aluminum with 2 17 ton titanium engines gone, but they ID'ed all but two of the victims. Yea right. An hour latter for the second time in history a passenger jet smashes into a small hole in the ground and POOF gone. Show me one other the history of the earth a plane crash and didn't leave bodies, gear, engines, tail section, over a large area. The time travel is all those cell phone calls. Five years age the airline industry made a big deal out of 'Now you can make a cell phone call while flying" when the years before that you couldn't make a cell phone call from 2,000 feet let alone 33 thousand. Those calls had to be made from a time machine traveling through the plane. LAST: When has the government been straight up with you giving you anything but lying bullshit. Any of it's over 2,000 agencies. Name one that would give you reason to believe anything they say. Nope ya can't do it so to believe our government in the first place is the act of a fool. So I will give you the benefit of the doughty and say you are not a fool so you must be a government troll. Do trolls ware those pointed little hats to hide their pointed little heads?
Lightweight aluminum wings sliced right through steel beams. Thats like butter cutting through the butter knife.
Water jet cutter.
Explain.
The simulation didn't claim to have cut through any beams. He said the simulator removed beams that reached a set amount of damage.
_"Lightweight aluminum wings"_
Tons of fuel were stored in the wings.
Those wings are extremly strong. Especially the wing box & spars. At 500 mph, no problem.
@@markh1011 Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt structural steel
Too bad that a plane can't fly through steel beams
Just one thing. How can an aluminium airplane slice through the huge steel beams that surrounded the building?
Kinetic energy
@@MFitz12 - Throw an egg against a concrete wall and the egg will go through the wall because of "kinetic energy"? Airplanes are like empty, thin aluminium cans. It doesn't matter how fast you shoot an empty, thin aluminium can against thick steel, it won't go through it. Even a bird can put a big dent in the thin nose of an airplane. And the wings of airplanes are especially flimsy. They would have ripped right off at impact against the huge steel beams and fallen down to the street. This video is pure BS. It reminds me of the "physics" demonstrated in episodes of Wiley E. Coyote and the Roadrunner.
@@TorMax9 - If the egg weighs 117 tons and is moving at 470 mph, then make the concrete wall a large bird cage instead and you will be closer.
If you are going to load your argument at least don't make it so freakin' obvious. 🤦♂🤦♂
They cannot! Congratulations on being more intelligent than most!
Brainwashed ignorant people! GOD Help them!
@@TorMax9aircraft have titanium structure my guy.
I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday. I was in Florida at the time on holiday with my family from the UK. We had literally just arrived at a Disney waterpark and were told to evacuate. On the radio there was a report of a "small plane going into the WTC". We went back to our villa and switched the TV. I literally could not believe what I was seeing. When the second plane hit the South Tower, I was stunned. It was like watching a movie, but the fact it was reality I was watching was horrifying and hard to grasp. By the time the second tower collapsed, I was in tears. We went out to eat that night and the US people were incredible. Their grit in the face of such a tragedy, their camaraderie and grace with us and their determination to see justice. What also haunts me is that literally an exact year before, I went to New York and had dinner in the beautiful "Windows on the World" restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower. I remember my Mum asking me to stand in the window for a photo, but I was too nervous to do so as I don't like heights. To think that so many people were trapped up on those high floors of the towers at those same windows with no option but to remain or jump is horrendous. Just terrifying and awful beyond belief. 9/11 is imprinted on my brain and will never leave me. My heart goes out to everyone who lost their lives, their loved ones and all of the survivors of that terrible, terrible day.
heartbreaking post
I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.
@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001)
He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy
@@stevengriffin5349 Cheers, our generation has grown up with some real issues sadly, but there are many who live on to be successful.
bruh the US does a 9/11 level of causalties attack on a weekly basis.
tragedy for us and collateral damage for everyone else...
Narration sounds middle eastern.
But very interesting
its a very sad event for my family, my uncle died in the crash, he was the pilot of the Plane. RIP
Sorry to hear this. What what his name?
My cousin piloted the other plane. RIP
I genuinely cannot tell if you’re being serious or not i cant tell anymore im sorry
I forgor
Uncle Atta ?
Very informative, I can't even begin to imagine the horror those people went through on that fateful day, I live in Connecticut and remember driving home just after the second plane hit the tower, and while driving east bound I84, there was a plane embanking like it was turning around, I was thinking to myself is this the next one as I was listening to the radio and just announced a third plane went missing, ( the one that crashed into the Pentagon,) I never felt so scared in all my life. We shall never forget what happened on that day.
True
a cruise missile hit the pentagon, not an airplane.
@wnwlknsn Thank you, we all saw it on tv with our own eyes, how the hell does he come up with cruise missile.
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 yeah, you keep watching Faux news, and the rest of us adults will watch the real news.
@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely.
are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath?
btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.
In 2005, 4 years after the attack, the government's own National Institute of Standards and Technolegy issued it's report. It stated out of the 236 outer columns 33 were damaged leaving 86% undamaged. NIST estimated 6 to 8 out of 47 core columns were damaged leaving 85% intact and undamaged. That is what's known as Minimal Damage. They found no scientific reason why or how these two towers fell.
They also found all materials used, welds,and bolts were above standards and no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees. NIST never tested for residue from explosives or accelerates.
In 2008 Shyam Sunder of the NIST said about building 7 " The phenomenon that was saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building was really thermal expansion that occurs at lower temperatures".
Science demands a clear path for structural mass to accelerate at the rate of gravity, except on 9/11. Just what is this lower temp. thermal expansion that allows free fall speed ignoring load bearing continuous vertical support, floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams, lateral crosses, diagonal bracing, tens of thousands of welds and bolts, interior walls and partitions, office contents, 1 1/2" through 12"cast iron pipe, electric conduit, and all the other utilities to fall at the speed of gravity. If this new 'science' is now a known fact wouldn't we want to condemn all high rise buildings in places like L.A. and Phoenix? And to think there are people that believe this crap.
_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_
Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there.
*"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*
Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.
IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_
You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel....
in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.
We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.
IXL2BW Again you did not address... or did not understand my post.
Обшивка самолёта из тонких алюминиевых листов прорубает стальные швеллеры? Вы серьёзно? Сразу возникают сомнения в адекватности модели...
You know, A huge problem with a lot of these recent comments is the fact that, they are just debating from partial knowledge. The planes were made of Aluminium, that is a FACT. The construction included Steel, that is a FACT. and the incident HAPPENED!! People be saying ""Plane made of Aluminium Sheet"" Sheet ? seriously? Do you even know what a Sheet looks and feels like ? The Plane would bend with the weight of the passengers itself, if it was a SHEET. Not only that, People be comparing 1mm of Aluminium with 40mm of steel saying Al will bend, which is TRUE. But they really don't consider the velocity of the body during the impact. In that case. I would suggest you to go back to school and learn the chapter "Collision" yet again !!
In conclusion: it appears that that particular 767 was made out of Japanese sword steel and that wall of the Trade Center was obviously made out of Play-Doh... NOT possible!
its unbelievable that even the wings dont break off
+Steven Bee
The 767's were about 1/3 filled with fuel at time of impact Steven.
Steven Bee
I think you are stretching the limits of credibility with that pop can vs solid wall of titanium Steven. What do you mean a solid wall? Is that solidly front to back or side to side. How far was that titanium wall solid for? Was it 12 feet thick solid or was it 4 miles thick solid? How fast do you think you can propel a pop can before it vaporizes from friction with air? How would you devise a plan to propel this can to the necessary velocity to penetrate this wall of unspecified thickness?
look at crashtests,they brake off,there thin
+Steven Bee
Nobody is interested in your scientific gobeldygook Stepen. I've done years of internet reaserch and have made my findings public, proving that it was a false flag. You deflecting only serves to prove that your a paid shill, probably at the behest of the powerful Jews at the controls.
No Steven, the screen name you replied to was a sock puppet that
duplicates other user's accounts. Maybe if you exercised a bit of due
diligence by checking into the accounts of these cretins that call you
names, you might just put these attacks into perspective.
This blew my mind 14 years ago. Now my mind is blown by how far we have advanced 👍
What blows my mind is that they take the videos off they don't want you to see and they promote videos that fit the official narrative!
@@nunyabisnis1448 narrative bro lol I agree though check my wake up playlist
It's blown my mind today tbh.
Soo true man, this video seems like the stone ages but at the time it was legit!
@The Internetwanderer it's not mama America. It's the Zionist Zombies who did that to our beautiful little world!
This simulation is now 16+ years old now, done well by the engineers at Purdue University. FEA (Finite Element Analysis), CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), and a whole host of other simulation software have come a long way since then. I suspect now they could even model the individual people in their seats and what happened to their bodies, but I know no one would do that due to how distressing that would be to family and friends.
If this simulation were done today, the detail would be incredible and very closely match all the videos of the day.
Imagine going to scan some papers, and you get hit with a plane