This Is Why America's Doesn't Have 'Carrier Killer' Ballistic Missiles Like China's
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 10. 2021
- China’s spending on anti-ship ballistic missiles may be misplaced, and not quite what is needed should a conflict between the United States and China break out, according to American Vice Adm. Jeffrey Trussler.
Trussler referenced several of China’s ballistic missiles, several of which have made headlines as “carrier-killers,” essentially large, long-range anti-ship missiles that could in theory strike-and sink-large targets like American aircraft carriers.
The U.S. Navy has kept a close eye in recent years on two of the Chinese missiles in particular, the Dong Feng-21, a medium range, road-mobile ballistic missile that is nuclear capable and has a 2,000+ kilometer range, as well as the Dong Feng-26, essentially a longer range variant of the DF-21. Development of the DF-26 has been especially worrying, as it very likely has the necessary range to strike most American assets in the eastern Pacific Ocean, including far-flung places like the new Marine Corps base on Guam.
Support us:
Facebook: / usdn.official
Instagram: / us_defensenews
For Copyright matters please contact us at: usdn.official@gmail.com - Věda a technologie
Could it be because none of our enemies have successfully implemented a carrier?? Key word being successfully.
That was my thought…
Thank you for your comment. It is not so much implementing a carrier; like building one. It is really carrier operations - the launching and successful recovery of naval aircraft. This is where it becomes difficult. For the US, from the dawn of jet carrier operations, say 1948, to 1988, about 40 years for the US Navy to achieve the same accident rate, for takeoffs and landings, as the US Air Force. During this timeframe, the US Navy lost approximately 8,500 personnel along with 12,000 aircraft.
Yeah 👍👍👍
That's why US ships cannot get that close to mainland China, or goodbye ships.
Number 1 USA.🌎🇺🇸🦅
God bless America.🇺🇸🙏🏻
More like number 2s
A declining super power.
The USA has lasers to shoot down missiles
Exactly.
Hypersonic is a snail's pace compared to the speed of light.
Prototypes. But are they widely deployed?
What about emp attack ?😂
@@niggamaster9139 A faraday cage shields against an EMP and most military platforms are inherently hardened since they are essentially large faraday cages which shield the interior against all but the strongest EMP fields. The Navy has been focused heavily on EMP attacks since 2012 and a carrier would certainly survive, but would likely require some on-board repairs (some planes, navigation aids, exposed circuitry, etc.)
@@niggamaster9139 USA has EMP too. So the attack would dissolve
You could sail the entirety of the world's collective navies against the United States on the open seas and two US Carrier Strike Groups could defeat the attack in fairly short order. China's navy cannot sail more than about 1000 miles from land...neither can Russia's.
US Military couldn't beat a bunch of Afghan cave dwellers, did you forget?
You’re assuming the Russian boats are seaworthy enough to get out of sight of shore. There’s footage around of their ships shot by the kids crewing; rotting trash scows needing dry dock top to bottom work. Sailors shirtless in board shorts.
Chinas ships are likely painted, but their military is run like a tong. Incredibly corrupt. That’s going to show up in both build quality and maintenance. The officer corps buys in to get to loot the services and do shady business deals.
Russia’s aircraft carrier can’t leave port without being towed by a tug.
Russia has one carrier that is docked for repairs 99% of the time.
It’s a soviet era carrier to boot.
China also has Nukes and would use them id they really wanted to destroy the USAs fleet.
@@Acheron666 but they still have layers of defense to deal with incoming threats.
Even if they did manage to sink one, the repercussions would be 10 fold.
We use missiles that are over 20 years old without any thoughts to replacements until now. We're 5 to 10 years behind in rockets and missiles compared to China and Russia. China is already packed their planes with air-to-air that has a range of 140+ miles with 6 on every plane, and we've got 90+ miles with 4 on every f35. Then using F15EX and trying to make up that difference. We're playing catchup.
I actually find this hilarious. We have lots of carrier killing armaments. 1 B-52? I nuclear missle fired from a sub? Or just a few torpedoes for their carriers. China has what? 2. We have fleets of them. It would be amazing one got through all the AA fire in a fleet umbrella. China would not be stupid enough to attack even one carrier. Russians wouldn't be stupid enough to use nukes. I will bet right now, we have enough subs operational, in International waters, just doing patrols, around Russia. They can easy take out dozens of cities, eh? In minutes. Everyone dies. Same with China. We won't fire first now. But no winners. Too many countries have nuclear weapons. Well, Americans do have some way worse. Is ending all of ourselves worth losing? Because that is what it means. War sucks, I know as a vet. Even conventional warfare is a messy business. China and Russia can forget about expansions. 2 countries can't shove around 30. They should stay in their borders and be happy we don't need parts of theirs. NATO countries are not aggressors. Never have been.
Well said
exactly
Bull shit
Well that is one solution for zero human made carbon emissions. The question is, who else has figured that out?
@@warrenpuckett4203 We will not be missed. 🤣😂🤣😂 I know we will not be around when our G class star supernovas. 😉
America doesn't need such a weapon, What? we need every weapon get our hands on.
Psst. We have lots of cool weapons. 😁 Flamethrower bots not a secret now. But that could rain on your parade. I only mention that because my grandfather was a cave clearer on Peleliu. Would have made his job easier. Even as they were operational then, his kill ratio was high. He killed lots just on patrol. The .45 Thompson a great invention. He liked to patrol around 6 to 7am. While they were shaving for the day. Like clockwork. Around daylight. He would take patrols out to probe their lines. They say lots of vets don't tell things. But as oldest grandson, they gushed the goriest details to me as a teenager. My one grandfather in the west, his trophies in a war museum. The one in the east, went from Juno beach, to the Battle of the Bulge. Sent home. Our family have survived every war so far. Otherwise, I wouldn't have been in Dessert Storm, eh?
To lose any Aircraft Carrier period would be devastating. You could only take out the enemy missile launchers by air power and hope you have your aircraft carrier still capable of landing aircraft on the deck..
The reason a loss of an aircraft carrier would be "devastating" is that we really don't have much ship building capability. We lost carriers in WW II but they were replaced. japan couldn't readily replace theirs. This video kissed the while point of anti-ship missiles. They a getting batter and cheaper to build all the time. The US should not be putting so many eggs into any one basket.
Dont get all caught up on the hype over "Anti carrier ballistic missile". All that means is China has developed a ballistic missile with mid course guidance correction to enable hitting a moving target.
Any anti ballistic missile system has potential to destroy the incoming missile. Most USN escort ships have Aegis defense system and most carry the Raytheon RIM-161 SM3 RAM (Standard Missile 3 Rolling Airframe Missile).
Most US ships that carry ballistic missiles can do this already. Not only has the US had this ability for years but the US CEP (Circular Error Of Probability) is much smaller than that of most other Countries. CEP means that for a given number of projectiles launched at a target 50% will land inside a imaginary circle. The smaller the circle the more accurate the system. As an example a USN F/A-18 Hornet dropping JDAM's has a CEP of 16 feet. If the GPS signal is jammed after launch CEP is still predicted to be less than 100ft.
Glad to have people like you elaborate
@@actionswon9478 I know right, great elaboration he provided.
Thanks for explaining
Most British naval ships have similar air defense. They were used against Argentine air force during Falkland war. Argentine air force manage to sink at least 4 British naval ship with advance air defense system onboard and heavily damage several more. Don't be too sure that you will never be hit and sink. Any thing that floats can be sunk.
@@silentwatcher1455 true, anything that floats can be sunk, but it is also true that not all that intends to sink anything is able to get it done.
China is great at copying, and that to me is no warranty, on the contrary, it is the opposite. So far their infrastructure keeps falling apart, buildings, skyscrapers, ships SINKING... so how can someone that builds crap can assure YOU that he or she can so something when all he or she builds falls apart? That to me is just having a big mouth.
Amen, God Bless Our Republic! One can never forget though, what 19 terrorists armed only with a box cutter and a plane ticket cost Us!
The U.S doesn't worry about flies since their swatter is much more advanced
Lost in Afghanistan. $2 trillion down the drain, $87 billion in seized weapons now headed to China.
Incorrect. The US Navy has the RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 for that purpose. It also has THAAD based systems in South Korea and Japan (that we know off) that cover that envelope along with Patriot PAC-3, and the AEGIS missile defense system, which is why a USS Nimitz or USS Ford carrier never travels alone but is escorted by destroyers like the Arleigh-Burke, Ticonderoga-class cruisers, support ships, and attack submarines.
Not to mention the F-35’s radar and sensors can overwhelm said missiles or the E/A-18E could use its own electronic warfare.
Trust me, the carriers are very well protected. The only way I can see them being taken out is by a tactical nuke or a super quiet submarine that got very lucky and bypassed all defenses. It would be a suicide mission but taking out 1 or even 2 of these carriers would not be a fatal blow in all our war against China, for instance. Not even close.
We have 22 carriers not 20.10 Nimitz Class, 2 Ford Class & 2 more under construction with 6-7 more to replace older carriers + 10 USMC’s LHD like the USS America and USS Wasp make 22. We also have the capability of building 10x more if we really wanted to during WWII we had dozens of battleships, destroyers and one more carrier before May of 1942 only 4 months post Pearl Harbor.
No defense against hypersonic missiles.
@@NeverTalkToCops1 Passive defenses exist for the hypersonic missiles.
@@NeverTalkToCops1
The US already has hypersonic missiles
@@NeverTalkToCops1 what do you mean no defense? The RIM-161 can hit a hypersonic easy so can most of the other ones. Its not like you have to "chase" the missile they only have to have the track intersect and go boom to take them out.
@@NeverTalkToCops1 lasers. Already under development by Israel to replace iron dome.
Only the speed of light🤣
They just tested one! 🤷♂️🤷♂️
Air Bourne laser system has entered chat
Um, did you miss spelling class?
Bourne is a character that Matt Damon plays, born is not applicable in your comment, airborne is all one word...
propaganda fed pleb entered the chat
Lasers? You’re cute, we’ll just put mirrors all over the carriers. Your move.
@@v10d mirrors won't work on a powerful laser
Perhaps the most compelling reason the U S isn't losing any sleep over this is because of the operative light based weapons it possesses as well as orbital combat capable vehicles. Good luck overcoming these two. Cheers!
Nothing is faster than light.
God Bless America!!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
No, lasers would not work on carriers. Why? Because of the curvature of the planet. At sea you can not see beyond 15 miles and laser don’t do curve balls very well. “Orbital combat vehicles”, you just made that up.. 🤣
@@Ullr-el3pu not made up, we have weapons in space….for real. Have you really never heard of the US Space Force? Those missiles could be shot down as they go up into the atmosphere, before they have a chance to come back down on a ship. That is from the arsenal in space that the US has, that can shoot them down. Much of the US military’s cutting edge weapons are secret even to most U.S. citizens, so I am confident they are comfortable with China developing these weapons because they have a counter-offensive weapon in the background. Plus the fighter jets have lasers on them and the Earth being round has nothing to do with how they hit the target from the air.
@@Ullr-el3pu Such smugness. You do realize that these have been tested and are operational yes? There are other systems that are funded through black budgets and are far more capable than anything the Chinese have. Cheers!
His number of ‘Carriers’ includes anything that can launch an aircraft… not just CV’s. There are roughly 23 fixed wing carriers
He's right.
War is unpredictable
How does the DF-21 track its target? Just destroy that.
No hyper sonic missile to date can fly in space. Good luck SPACE COMMAND!
🇺🇸 Not worried at all
Satellite s can find and track carriers easily and send coordinates.
HE IS WORRIED ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT HENCE HE ADVISING CHINA NOT TO DO IT.
Big deal carriers can stay out of reach and still unload 1k missiles at one and take out most of the BM launchers .
This is a Chinese channel don’t bother
Maybe we do maybe we don’t….probably a smart idea to keep them guessing.
If China thinks air craft carried are obsolete. Then why are they building them.?
Good question there
China think carrier are only good against much weaker enemy but obsolete against peer adversary. Chinese Carrier plays a different role in the fleet than US carriers
Perhaps the main issue with the Chinese carrier killer missile is its inability to track and locate the US carrier(s)? Let's say the PLA located the carrier and initiated a launch. With the time of flight, say thirty minutes, the carrier is now +/- approximately seventeen (17) miles away from its previous coordinates.
Well that is a miss. And it would probably be shot down anyway. Even if they launched a dozen.
Not to mention the US is probably developing some extremely impressive counter measures. Hard to pick out the right target when there’s all of a sudden 10 for the incoming missiles.
The chinese missile can track and follow a target...... If its nuclear tipped, it just needs to be close....
Flight time would be around 3 to 6 min, an ICBM can get from Moscow to New York in 26 min and these are mid range platforms with depressed trajectory, hence much, much shorter flight time of missile to target.
@@Cerebrosoft Those are ICBMs which travel over mach 20 due to the huge 3 stage motor.
Df-21 and 26 is mach 8 or around there. They aren't as fast.
Beavus and Butthed would be perfect to announce DONG
What would happen if a nuclear powered ship went down? Seems extremely dangerous play with these toys in our oceans. I think of Fukushima. Thoughts?
As long as the reactor core is not breached the reactor is designed to go into a sort of lockdown and seal itself up and will sit on the bottom sealed for hundreds of years or until retrieved in salvage. The USN has lost two nuclear subs. Soviets have lost a few but I cant think off and of more than three.
USS Thresher sank April 1963 when it failed to surface. The ship imploded after passing crush depth. The reactor is still sitting on the seafloor and US Navy still monitors the site for radioactive contamination. So far its still safe.
USS Scorpion sank May 1968. The ship had damage not consistent with imploding from crush depth so there are several rumours and conspiracies about her sinking.
The USN also monitors the Scorpions wr3eck site for radioactive contamination. So far the reactors have worked as designed.
The Chinese haven't been developing these for decades they stole 1970's schematics and started from there as with most of China's advanced weapon system's they stole it by hacking complacent western defence systems. Since those system's have been reworked and secured China's advances have slowed to a crawl remember China still can't develop a decent engine for their fighter program so the chance's they have advanced propulsion for their missiles is questionable. Lastly China has not hit anything with any of their carrier killer missiles except stationery target's up to now there is no verifiable evidence that they are capable of hitting a moving target much less a carrier with the defensive capabilities of a carrier strike group.
When a nation that are secured in it powers it does not have any need to tell other what it have. Its can't be said for those that are lacking!!!
Hopefully those weapon defense systems work.
Imagine if we spent this much money feeding the poor and what the world be?
Hitler would be on the 20$ bill
The world would be overpopulated and dying because of it and war would be everywhere all the time because humans are naturally aggressive.
War has always proven anythink can happen, when plans dont work out its already to late to change, for example if the US carrier defence systems do fail to defend and carrier is destroyed, what then, send in more to be destroyed, concidering Imperial Japan learned the pain and cost from carrier losses
20 carriers!?
The already deployed X37 can sink any city or ship from orbit.
because we own all the carriers
Hey China, how about a Ohio class submarine 😆
Each SSBN submarine is armed with up to 24 Trident II submarine-launched nuclear ballistic missiles (SLBM)Mach 24 in terminal phase. Each SSGN is capable of carrying 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles, plus a complement of Harpoon missiles to be fired through their torpedo tubes.
And we neither confirm or deny that statement
Ah yes, instead of conventional weapons you can only threaten nuclear.
The key here is... That we know of
Lets go Bandon
Neither side is gonna advertise what they've got, except the crap they tell ignorant people. You'll know when the stuff is used!!!!
Ummm the reason we don’t need carrier killer missiles because…no one else has carriers. Also it’s a defensive weapon, a carrier is offensive. Since no one is coming near our homeland, we don’t need to waste money on that
If a carrier goes down we would end up in a nuclear war. As it is, a carrier can take enough damage to not sink and yet also not function as a carrier. Hundreds or thousands of the crew might die. And… that would yield similar results
The micourse interceptor is 50-50 chance by Pentagon assuming the ICBM is a traditional simple missile from North Korea. The US has zero defence for Chiense glide hypersonic missile.The US can not test it since Pentagon has no hypersonic missile.
Chinese Russian alliance sugcessfully test
Carrier group killer missile
January 15 2022 . Hunga tunga Island
The carrier killers will be 50mt so no need to hit directly.
PRC must find and track a U.S. carrier at long range with a missile.# North Pacific is enormous.
Also, how can PRC protect DF21s and their launchers on the ground?
But the south china sea isn't
Just like us, using surface to air missiles, etc etc. My god yall underestimate china
It’s called satellite
Am sure US either HAS or at worst very soon WILL have plenty of the world's finest & deadliest Carrier killer /Submarine killer/destroyer-frigate-surface warship killer missiles, both quality & quality, and both supersonic & hypersonic
The United States doesn't need them. There isn't another navy in the world that poses a threat to the US on the waves.
US Navy has Carriers. No one else can operate a carrier. Many many years of operations over a myriad of missions. Oh. Don’t forget the subs.
My main concern is made in China.
If China or for that matter Russia launch any missiles against any U.S. ship, let alone an Aircraft Carrier. God help them.
Yankee just talk talk!
they would annihilated
@@bertiewooster3326 Ohio class submarine has 24 hypersonic missiles with 8 separate 475MT nuclear warheads that can all be sent to different target's. that's enough to wipe out all of Russia and China....You were saying?? yeah that's exactly what I thought.
the U.S. still runs the world. number 1 baby
@@boostjunkie2320 You just talk talk the US has no operational hypersonic missiles in Subs, as for separate warheads thats old technology the Brits have had them way before the US !! May I suggest you stop reading bubble gum cards for your inaccuracy.
@@bertiewooster3326 I suggest you stop getting your information off of the back of Central boxes kid
If you can beat your enemy electronically job done
But we don't have anything to detect or bring down Russia, Chinese or North Korea hyper/super sonic rockets.
No? Lol..
We have for decades.
all missiles are able to be detected. Keep in mind you don't need a hyper missile to intercept a hyper missile. All you need is a wall.
that's a lot of COPE
You should still build some and work on technology so we have it
Because I he U.S. being the most experienced navy with carrier operations, understand how fast carriers can move, and know that ballistic missiles are fairly easy to avoid. Pretty much you perform a turn after the missile is launched and you are miles away from the impact point before the missile gets there.
True. I think what people forget is turns at hypersonic speeds involve tens of miles.
Flank speed turns of a nuclear carrier would cause any missile trying to keep a lock to break apart.
As we see with in Ukraine theater of operations , missiles are Russia’s biggest weapon and threat .. China is selecting the same asset packages for pacific
Usa Japan Uk Aussies navy and land areas are adjusting to the threat as it changes .
Well if China really had carrier’s’ then they probably would build it.
Do not discard any options. December 7th not teach the military anything? Yeah thay know.
Predicting war😂😂🤣
If you disable a carrier it is practically Dead.
Torpedo is a more effective ship killer than a missile,lift the ship out of teh water and break its back
But our Carrier's have proven very vulnerable to attack submarines. Exercises vs French/Swedish subs I believe ended in Carrier kills and then in at least 1 they went on to start taking out the rest of the battle group. Plus a Chinese sub surfaced within firing range of one of our carriers and none of our assets knew it was there. Not even our attached subs. ASW is where we are very lacking as far as I can tell. We may be a whole lot more vulnerable than we think we are.
And at the same time our subs are always lurking unseen unheard…..with nukes ready to launch.
Those exercises were conducted with nerfed (USN) ASW screens as a baseline.
@@nanii414 Ohhh that's good to hear. Do you have more info i can find on that?
@@MrZonehawk Whether it's RIMPAC or some other joint-friendlies shitfest, just look at the exclusion zone. Compare that to just how far out a CSG actually spins its ASW screen. That's even BEFORE you get to the fact of not actually having a full CSG in place for any of these exercises, which have had friendly subs penetrating the ad hoc / interoperability screens since the early 90's.
As I said: nerfed.
@@MrZonehawk ummm do you mean the 4 person bicycle sub that the chinese use? sure they will go undetected but they arent armed either.......🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I bet you they do. And I bet they have better toys in stock for China.
Nah. US submarines have enemy carrier killing capability and as such are slow and heavy but stealthy. US carriers will ferry other missiles and weapons not compromising weight or tonnage more than they have to. The more tonnage devoted to support anti-ship, anti-air and ground operation, the better. Any gaps will be provided by US submarines and/or US Air Force, US Space Force. US Navy surface ships should be devoted to its own mission profile. Enemy carriers can be sunk with US submarines. That is why US Navy surface ships do not carry heavy and bulky and gigantic carrier killer ballistic missiles. No space and no spare tonnage for that cr*p. Strategically US will be fighting away from homeland, so everything will need to be ferried. Thus, weight matters. China will be fighting closer to their homeland. That is why China is willing to fight with large carrier killing missiles and hypersonic missiles. US Navy will be the first to make contact in any foreign conflict. That is why US Navy must strike light, hard and fast. No bulky unnecessary bull cr*p. US Air Force or US Space Force can shoot hypersonic missiles. US Army can arrive to the battlefield after US Navy destroys everything and lay their US Army toilets to sit on the obliterated battlefield. Nothing to do but sit on toilets.
Don't forget the B-21.
DEW's and antimatter weaponry Is what America needs 30Mw on up
Lol, antimatter.. not likely.
Firearms and Weapons For Freedom. ‘Merica!
Can they dodge Super nukes coming from space at Mach 15 ? Like Satan 2 ?
Can they dodge a Rail-Gun ?
Can they dodge a Mach 23 LGM minute man
@@Jaywiz919 in reality neither US, nor Russia, nor China can dodge shit. Only slow moving missiles as we’ve seen in Israel-Palastina.
If poor North-Korea can launch an ICBM that could have had a Nuke on board, fly it right over Japan and literally over a US / USAF base. Without anyone noticing it, until a few with a mobile phone recorded it.
I dont think we can dodge much
That's simple we don't need it lmao
This channel has to be owned by China or Russia
Question is though, after the sinking of Russia's powerful warship in Ukraine, can US war ships handle anti-ship missiles when US radars are being overwhelmed by drones?
Im confident the protector aegis, and ticonderoga spy 1 radar can tell the diff between drones and a ballistic missile.
Its more than capable of ballistic missile defense- hell it even tracked a ufo.
The russian stuff is nothing like ours.
US are the no.1 in drone technology impossible scenarios...170 defense satellites , missile defenses, around the globe..US are empire on this planet no one will dare to attack first...one false move is zero...
NATO supported defenses imagine their allies during war ...only anti ship unprecised target...but if US will retaliate its high precision guided missiles
Stealth bombers above....hundreds of drone attacks
800 plus military bases...
Nuclear subs hiding in all oceans, arctic circle, north pole, south pole,
Enemies are nothing...
Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!
Work on dealing with your current dictator in the WH and Congress first before worry about other foreign countries. US have tons of countries who hated her due to her terrorist activities on other people's homeland. These military toys are going to be command by lower standard personeel in the near future.
@@tomsuh1362 Yeah, she from Communism party.
Except german chancellor doesn't respect the u.s
NATO, AUKUS, and the QUAD, etc, are waiting bring it on.
Weren’t too successful in Afghanistan. Not too popular in Iraq and the rest of the Middle East.
Still bad , big target
US anti air missiles are so Patriot. Just like The Patriot air defense. when they launch a anti air missile that come back after gaining an minimum altitude and kisses it's launcher. Because they don't want to leave their mother land and very Patriot missile.👍
China could also warn the U.S. that it is also considering selling nuclear submarines to Iran or other countries as a counterweight to U.S. arbitrary exports of nuclear submarines
Do you trust armarment made in China? Really? LOL
But how would those submarines get from China to Iran?
Us could sell nuclear subs to Japan Taiwan and anyother countries it bullies.
@@craigclemens986 What? How would the US stop the sale of nuclear submarines to Iran?
@@Dept246 Theres the logistics of the actual delivery. That can be blocked.
I think those hardware is not the best weapons of the us it google android and their products. The ship is big and it is easy to target
Lol oppression doesn't work when it comes down to reality. American people are different. We aren't afraid to think for ourselves and fight back how we see fit.
LRHW: am i a joke to you
Xi Hitler JIN PIG will be in the Chinese Yuan.
How about there won’t be a next war✌️
Rods from God…. Nuff said
Hey God I believe that China's sand islands need a hurricane to help finish them sink all the way under the water
Do our adversary's
Have submarine capabilities to sneak up on our carriers
Look how easily the
Ukrainian took out the pride of Russia
Just asking?
Russia was the first to develop this idea
One American U.F.O. will wipe these missiles right out of the sky. ;P
がんばれアメリカ🇺🇸
CAUSE WE RULE THE BATTLEFEILD
Lmao
Lmao is such an inappropriate response! Besides, we do rule the battlefield!
@@meteorfive6 lol
@@geg6382 you seem to be less fortunate in the brain department or you have not grown up yet
@@meteorfive6 inappropriate response but why
it would be stupid to develop weapon that could kill your own carrier. PLA will copy that in a week at cheaper price. But don't worry, PLA and Russia have already found their way to do that.
They have countermeasures to such missiles. 500 to 900 said missiles in one strike group. Not to mention particle beam weapons and higher power LAWs.
@@jaimearredondo787 watch more Hollywood lol
@@jaimearredondo787 Sure but what defense against drone swarms in the thousands? You can run but you can’t hide kid.
@@Dept246 Neither china nor russia has that capability.
@@leka6765 Angel has Fallen
dont forget the 14 ohio class subs, 1 can kill a country
5000 df-21 =1 us carrier i take the 5000 anytime without any deaths
Df-21 is already obsolete
Ukraine war all because of china rise US got jealouse n this happen to Russian n ukraine ..jealoseness is the culprits between strong n weakness
There are not only "carrier killer " missiles but many more types that is unknown to the US.
China is way smarter then this!, You honestly think they want war? Hell No! No one does except Putin! He fell on his head and woke up to 1960 😂😂, Go Ukraine!!!
'
come on americans companys...
americans companys musts makes many more better bigger strongger arms weapons
Thank you for your service BUT DOD PLEASE STOP WEARING THISE RIDICULOUS FACE MASKS. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
ALL RIGHT THIS IS WHAT I M LUVING... OLE 64 YR OLE LADY DISABLED WITH MS.
COME N GET ME NOW. I WANT HELP. NO I JUST LUV IT THAX KIDS. maryxmas/TN.
try English
This is more propaganda bulshit we have plenty of delivery system they can hit over 1500 miles carrier Killer goes 1000 that's why we don't care we can take them out ahead of time if need be I don't know why I'm even bothering, commenting on this yes the range of a Strike Fighter is five six hundred miles then it has to come back but that's plenty of Striking Distance for a missile to strike its Target 1500 Mi away
The reason why is we have something far superior