AI-generated movies are here
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 04. 2024
- Do you have a right to your image?
Watch the full replay of Ethan Mollick with Zach Weissmueller & Liz Wolfe on the Just Asking Questions podcast: • How will AI change us?...
Subscribe to the Just Asking Questions podcast: • Dave Smith vs. Chris F...
CZcams Music: • Just Asking Questions
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/5SpySKA...
Both the T-1000 and the T-800 models showed us that robots can be perfectly capable actors, as seen in the documentary _Terminator II._
Anything that puts fear in Hollywood is ok by me.
Why won't they simply adopt it?
@@babyqueenxo Union contracts
Indeed!
@@theBear89451 Ahh ofc!!
Lol it's not. They'll be the ones forcing this shit down your throat.
AI and CGI is a fine line, both computer generated and both have to have human input.
AI was a huge issue in the strike, but both SAG-AFTRA and WGA completely caved on AI. I've read the new contract and there are huge loopholes that allow producers to use AI to replace people. The only concession the unions earned was to pay people to use their digital image, which is something the studios were going to do anyway.
Thank goodness Copyright is finally being looked at closer than any time in recent generations.
Bob Iger should have released a more powerful counter speech with AI generated Bryan Cranston
That would be awesome.
That would be a dramatic shot fired!
1. Yall forgot to point out that the video - airhead - only has a few static scenes as ai. Most of that is actually just normal footage filmed. Watch the behind the scenes.
2. Ai changes the dynamic of what is required for imagination.
Heisenberg hates robots. There's a knock at the door and robots are the danger.
The true threat of A.I. is to the cartoonists not the actors
Yes. That baloon head guy keeps his job.
Stop voting.
Eliminating jobs is precisely what technology is for.
Lol there hasn't been a true cartoon movie out of Hollywood in 25 years
The ironic thing is that being part of a union is going to ultimately drive the producers and the writers to be replaced, I don't think we're at the point where we could replace the actors...
Not yet
@@BellofattoBrews I don't know which part of my comment you are responding to specifically, but irregardless you are correct...
@@skeleton_craftGaming yeah it was pretty vague but just agreeing with you that we are not there yet where actors will be replaced. Can’t see how it’s not going to happen at some point.
@@BellofattoBrews I mean I knew you were agreeing with me... Me not realizing u were talking about a actors was just a skill issue on my end.
Historically photos and videos have been trusted material, providing irrefutable proof. But all that is changing with AI generated images, videos, music and conversations.
The future will be; trust nothing is real.
Wait a minute...how can I know if this WHOLE video is not AI generated? How can we prove it is or isn't?
Because AI videos have a different esthetic to them currently
@@martinlutherkingjr.5582exactly. But that will change soon
How do you know the world around you isn't AI-generated?
Does it matter?
This is why media is trying to kill it. See Taylor Swift outrage. If everybody can make "art" then their multimillion dollar jobs are threatened.
Thank you for pointing out Cranston's hypocrisy
Please make a video about these 2 amazing AI tools
1. Romo AI - All Super AI tools in one place
2. Learnex AI - world's First fully AI powered education platform
_"Life is fragile, We're all a pin prick away from deflation"_ ... You don't say AI 💀
Deflation > KeynesGPT
Or a plug pull....
@@io3213 That's such an esoteric joke, gotta give that a like.
-An Economist
I cant wait till all of hollywood has to move to skid row😂
It will be funny watching Hollywood work for minimum wage.
I have a great idea for the first commercially viable Ai film but I won't share it on here cuz somebody will steal the idea.
First time I was confronted with this issue of 'owning likeness' when one of the big beer companies had that commercial with John Wayne 'acting' in it.
It will be like the comic books, out favorite characters will never age. Superman and Wolverine will never die.
Couldn't AI-generated films create a renaissance in live theatre?
I love Bryan Cranston's work but I agree with Liz on how cringy his speech was. People worried about synthesizers, auto tune and CGI but good story telling and writing will be what keeps people watching quality shows or movies not AI or how something is produced. Some of these multi millionaire actors just need to learn to code as coal miners have had to do to adjust to the changing world.
You're lost in this debate of whether or not it will be better than humans. That is not the important question. Will it produce commercially acceptable product? That is what Hollywood sells, not art. As a consumer I just would have to say yeah it looks not much better or worse than some of the product produced recently.
The fight against AI will probably go as well as the one against the Printing Press
See the book: A.EYE CANDY: A Museum of Imaginary Robots and Other Digital Delights.
Art today, warfare tomorrow. Fun times ahead.
All your jobs are belong to us.
When am MIT interview with Stephen Pinker looks like it was filmed and recorded by a 1980’s High School AV club in 2024… we are not our tools.
You people have never understood. Is that the paying customer decides what level of quality? What level of art is acceptable to pay for?. Why would a studio pay for anything more than that?
Is not all ai controlled by human input and prompts?
I've used AI to generate two concepts so far . It really brought it into focus. Isn't makeup and camera creativity with modeling or stop action a form of crude AI?
You cannot own ideas, there is no conflict.
Depending on the country you live in. I'm sure they are going to send lobbyists to get laws passed to own ideas soon. This will hurt small business and make the rich richer.
@@johnwesley256 I mean there's already laws that say you can own ideas [That is what IP law (with the exclusion of copyright, which requires there to be work done before it is invoked) is]. I was talking more philosophically. Two people could come up with the same idea independently. Therefore there is no limit to the supply of the resource that is intellect, therefore, you cannot have [in a free open market] conflict over ideas. Therefore, in so much as that ownership is to resolve conflict of use, you cannot own any ideas because there is not the conflict that is required for you to claim ownership over something. And due to that fact all of these intellectual property laws (Again save copyright) actually artificially create conflict by limiting who can and cannot think things, and therefore in my opinion, at least are unethical and their costs significantly outweigh their benefits.
@@skeleton_craftGamingyou’re referring to patent law. Typically, patents only run for a few years. There’s a very short period of artificially created conflicts.
You’re also forgetting trademarks, which require action. They are created by operating under a brand name or logo. In fact, inaction after securing them can result in a forfeiture of the trademark.
@@skeleton_craftGaming Completely agree 💯. A certain company long ago was able to change the public domain laws for their benefit though they had made most of their money off of public domain stories. The problem is that free and open market has been being attacked for years and our politicians have been making a fortune in the stock market. Currently many states are rolling back child labor laws. All the fighting unions did to make it so we had a middle class has been lost through disinformation and corporation influence on education. Anti-trust and Monopoly laws have been being repealed. In the last 2 decades we've seen many strikes. Though inflation has gone up considerably, tax brackets have stayed almost the same. Our Social security system pays the rich triple of what other countries pay (they don't even need it IMO, as it was set up to allow people to not work after a certain age).
Your argument is perfectly sound, but the leeches will do what they do best. We vote them into the office then they sell us out, all the while they extort us and diminish our rights. Both parties!
@@skeleton_craftGaming Is it difficult to play video games as a skeleton? just random info: didja know Lack Luster started his channel as a gaming channel? I imagine gripping a controller would be difficult for a skeleton. Gonna check out your Skyrim vid.
Liz has something of a point there. It will still take human creativity to make really great art, music, or whatever. And while the democratization of AI tools will allow talentless people to make lots mediocre works, it will also help us discover more creative people who are in disadvantaged situations.
As for the data, I already have serious reservations about copyrights, but I question if we truly own our personal data, or if we do, just how would we able to enforce property rights in personal data. Do I have the right to tell someone how they can use a photo of me? The same thing about an AI clone of me. Maybe how that data is obtained makes a difference; maybe it doesn't. If any kind of enforcement is possible, it will probably be technological, not legal.
If you worry about copyright, then you are not able to produce value anymore and demand to live off the past. Of course an AI can "watch" or "hear" anything that's available to be viewed or heard. I mean, should we have removed special effects or stunt people because they are "fake"?
What right do humans have to a job with a decent wage? Why do so many people equate things they want to rights? Where did all these rights that all these people are talking about come from?
How do we know this video isn't AI?!?! Everyone on the internet except me is a bot.
Of the four prime directives necessary for basic civilization, freedom (absence of coercion and deceit), property (whatever you acquire without coercion or deceit), contracts, (the legal mechanism for exchanging property through rights and obligations), and equitable compensation for proven damages, property is the most problematic.
For civilization to exist, there needs to be a recognition that these directives are necessary either through collective willingness to respect the directives or enforcement by something, institutions, governments, whatever. A healthy republic that incorporates the people through juries that decide if they want to support the use of force against any particular individual tends to render the most stable and fair results, the greatest good for the greatest number.
I'm not uneducated (I like the idea of AI and have no sympathy whatsoever for either Hollywood or workers raking in hundreds of thousands who consider it their eternal right instead of a gift conferred by sheer luck of birth), but in conflicts like these I gladly surrender the decision to a jury. Of course, that's why juries aren't popular with special interests, it's a lot harder to guarantee the use of force for my pet fetish.
Is he speaking for the thousands who have lost their jobs to robots or just his people in his Hollywood bubble?
Go AI!!
Hal9000
Those acting in movies right now are the last generation of live actors to be in major motion pictures.
Instead of paying the salary and productions cost to make a movie with Scarlett Johansson, why wouldn't you make 10 or 12 movies with a new AI character and see which one is a hit. It actually doesn't have to be a hit. It just has to make more revenue than it cost which is actually the formula for profitability. Not what was the box office?
Yes, they are here. And, as of now, they're still crap
If this is the future of Hollywood, the future of Hollywood sucks.
The 'present' of Hollywood sucks.
It's already dead. Now starts the rotting.
This is just the beginning.
@@droptozro Unfortunately
I laugh at these illiberal actors and actresses that lambasted middle class people that were fighting over these same issues as their jobs were outsourced. They called them racists and other names. All I have to say to them is "learn to code Bryan et al"
People aren't going to want to watch ai movies.
I agree. They won't be relatable. This might be what finally pushes people away from their screens and makes them go outside.
The majority of mainstream content is utter garbage.
A.I. doesn't have a very high bar to transcend in order to put that moronic condescending swill we call mainstream - in the past tense .
They sure play a lot of video games so why wouldn’t they like AI movies? They may actually prefer them if the plot/story is good.
There has been AI in movies for 20 years. Lord of the Rings relied heavily on AI for fight scenes. So the idea that people will refuse to watch AI movies is wishful thinking.
@@HedgehobbitI think the definition of "ai" keeps getting stretched more and more just to have a new buzzword. First off none of this is ai, but anything from 20 years ago was barely even machine learning
We need to make sure that ai filmmaking is not gatekept by certain types of people, the whole advantage of ai filmmaking is that common people don't have to abide by the consumption wishes of politicized narcissists and thus enabling common people to direct and create what they want to see.
One way or another we're going to be liberated from leftist cultural tyranny and we can do it the easy way or the hard way.
The choice is theirs. 😉